SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Data Monitoring Committees and early stopping guidelines: the Southwest Oncology Group experience.

Data Monitoring Committees in the Southwest Oncology Group comprise the study leadership and the leadership of the Group, augmented by some outside representation. The early stopping guidelines used by these committees are explicit in each protocol, and can be characterized as specifying a few interim analyses at conservative statistical levels. We describe our ten years of experience with this system, and give examples of different trials which have stopped either for positive or negative results.

Bias↗

PubMed2006

Progress and problems for randomized clinical trials: from streptomycin to the era of megatrials.

Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) are the definitive contributors to evidence-based medicine. RCTs assessing serious outcomes in cardiovascular disease have grown, with 'megatrials' becoming more common with the realization that wrong conclusions resulted from random error in inadequately sized trials. Simple design and a heterogeneous patient population were early features, but multinational trials have increased in scientific, logistical, bureaucratic, regulatory, and legal complexity. These studies now exceed the financial means of academia or medical charities. Governments have left the bill with the pharmaceutical industry, encouraging a symbiosis with academics, who contribute medical and scientific expertise, and access to patients. Industry provides pharmacological, pharmaceutical, technical and regulatory know-how, good clinical practice expertise, and legal assistance during the trial. Study supervision is then in the hands of an independent steering committee and associated subcommittees, until appropriate dissemination of results. Prospectively defined interaction with the sponsor facilitates unbiased design and conduct, but arrangements need careful implementation to avoid conflicts of interest. The patient is protected by a strong data safety monitoring board that is wholly independent. Megatrials are under threat from over-regulation, increasing costs, and difficulties in execution. These issues merit urgent public and political education and debate.

Computer Security↗

PubMed2000

Design and statistical issues of the hemodialysis (HEMO) study.

The Hemodialysis Study is a multicenter clinical trial of hemodialysis prescriptions for patients with end stage renal disease. Participants from over 65 dialysis facilities associated with 15 clinical centers in the United States are randomized in a 2 x 2 factorial design to dialysis prescriptions targeted to a standard dose or a high dose, and to either low or high flux membranes. The primary outcome variable is mortality; major secondary outcomes are defined based on hospitalizations due to cardiovascular or infectious complications, and on the decline of serum albumin. The Outcome Committee, consisting of study investigators, uses a blinded review system to classify causes of death and hospitalizations related to the major secondary outcomes. The dialysis dose intervention is directed by the Data Coordinating Center using urea kinetic modeling programs that analyze results from dialysis treatments to monitor adherence to the study targets, adjust suggested dialysis prescriptions, and assist in trouble-shooting problems with the delivery of dialysis. The study design has adequate power to detect reductions in mortality rate equal to 25% of the projected baseline mortality rate for both of the interventions.

Humans↗

PubMed2005

Phase III pilot study of dose escalation using conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer: PSA control and side effects.

Radical radiotherapy is a standard form of management of localised prostate cancer. Conformal treatment planning spares adjacent normal tissues reducing treatment-related side effects and may permit safe dose escalation. We have tested the effects on tumour control and side effects of escalating radiotherapy dose and investigated the appropriate target volume margin. After an initial 3-6 month period of androgen suppression, 126 men were randomised and treated with radiotherapy using a 2 by 2 factorial trial design. The initial radiotherapy tumour target volume included the prostate and base of seminal vesicles (SV) or complete SV depending on SV involvement risk. Treatments were randomised to deliver a dose of 64 Gy with either a 1.0 or 1.5 cm margin around the tumour volume (1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups) and also to treat either with or without a 10 Gy boost to the prostate alone with no additional margin (64 and 74 Gy groups). Tumour control was monitored by prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing and clinical examination with additional tests as appropriate. Acute and late side effects of treatment were measured using the Radiation Treatment and Oncology Groups (RTOG) and LENT SOM systems. The results showed that freedom from PSA failure was higher in the 74 Gy group compared to the 64 Gy group, but this did not reach conventional levels of statistical significance with 5-year actuarial control rates of 71% (95% CI 58-81%) in the 74 Gy group vs 59% (95% CI 45-70%) in the 64 Gy group. There were 23 failures in the 74 Gy group and 33 in the 64 Gy group (Hazard ratio 0.64, 95% CI 0.38-1.10, P=0.10). No difference in disease control was seen between the 1.0 and 1.5 cm margin groups (5-year actuarial control rates 67%, 95% CI 53-77% vs 63%, 95% CI 50-74%) with 28 events in each group (Hazard ratio 0.97, 95% CI 0.50-1.86, P=0.94). Acute side effects were generally mild and 18 weeks after treatment, only four and five of the 126 men had persistent > or =Grade 1 bowel or bladder side effects, respectively. Statistically significant increases in acute bladder side effects were seen after treatment in the men receiving 74 Gy (P=0.006), and increases in both acute bowel side effects during treatment (P=0.05) and acute bladder sequelae (P=0.002) were recorded for men in the 1.5 cm margin group. While statistically significant, these differences were of short duration and of doubtful clinical importance. Late bowel side effects (RTOG> or =2) were seen more commonly in the 74 Gy and 1.5 cm margin groups (P=0.02 and P=0.05, respectively) in the first 2 years after randomisation. Similar results were found using the LENT SOM assessments. No significant differences in late bladder side effects were seen between the randomised groups using the RTOG scoring system. Using the LENT SOM instrument, a higher proportion of men treated in the 74 Gy group had Grade > or =3 urinary frequency at 6 and 12 months. Compared to baseline scores, bladder symptoms improved after 6 months or more follow-up in all groups. Sexual function deteriorated after treatment with the number of men reporting some sexual dysfunction (Grade> or =1) increasing from 38% at baseline to 66% at 6 months and 1 year and 81% by year 5. However, no consistent differences were seen between the randomised groups. In conclusion, dose escalation from 64 to 74 Gy using conformal radiotherapy may improve long-term PSA control, but a treatment margin of 1.5 cm is unnecessary and is associated with increased acute bowel and bladder reactions and more late rectal side effects. Data from this randomised pilot study informed the Data Monitoring Committee of the Medical Research Council RT 01 Trial and the two studies will be combined in subsequent meta-analysis.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed2006

All-arthroscopic versus mini-open repair of small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears: a protocol for a randomized trial [NCT00128076].

BACKGROUND: Rotator cuff tears are the most common source of shoulder pain and disability. Only poor quality studies have compared mini-open to arthroscopic repair, leaving surgeons with inadequate evidence to support optimal, minimally-invasive repair. METHODS/DESIGN: This randomized, multi-centre, national trial will determine whether an arthroscopic or mini-open repair provides better quality of life for patients with small or moderate-sized rotator cuff tears. A national consensus meeting of investigators in the Joint Orthopaedic Initiative for National Trials of the Shoulder (JOINTS Canada) identified this question as the top priority for shoulder surgeons across Canada. The primary outcome measure is a valid quality-of-life scale (Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC)) that addresses 5 domains of health affected by rotator cuff disease. Secondary outcomes will assess rotator cuff functionality (ROM, strength, Constant score), secondary dimensions of health (general health status (SF-12) and work limitations), and repair integrity (MRI). Outcomes are measured at baseline, at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months post-operatively by blinded research assistants and musculoskeletal radiologists. Patients (n = 250) with small or medium-sized cuff tears identified by clinical examination and MRI who meet eligibility criteria will be recruited. This sample size will provide 80% power to statistically detect a clinically important difference of 20% in WORC scores between procedures after controlling for baseline WORC score (alpha = 0.05). A central methods centre will manage randomization, data management, and monitoring under supervision of experienced epidemiologists. Surgeons will participate in either conventional or expertise-based designs according to defined criteria to avoid biases from differential surgeon expertise. Mini-open or all-arthroscopic repair procedures will be performed according to a standardized protocol. Central Adjudication (of cases), Trial Oversight and Safety Committees will monitor trial conduct. We will use an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), where the baseline WORC score is used as a covariate, to compare the quality of life (WORC score) at 2 years post-operatively. As a secondary analysis, we will conduct the same statistical test but will include age and tear size as covariates with the baseline score. Enrollment will require 2 years and follow-up an additional 2 years. The trial will commence when funding is in place. DISCUSSION: These results will have immediate impact on the practice behaviors of practicing surgeons and surgical trainees at JOINTS centres across Canada. JOINTS Canada is actively engaged in knowledge exchange and will publish and present findings internationally to facilitate wider application. This trial will establish definitive evidence on this question at an international level.

Arthroscopy↗

PubMed2003

Multicenter study differentiated thyroid carcinoma (MSDS). Diminished acceptance of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy.

AIM: The Multicenter Study Differentiated Thyroid Carcinoma (MSDS) is an ongoing study in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland on the clinical benefit of adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (RTx) for locally invasive differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC) in TNM stages pT4 pN0/1/x M0/x (5th ed. 1997). METHODS: MSDS was designed as a prospective randomized trial. Patients receive thyroidectomy, radioiodine therapy (RIT) to ablate the thyroid remnant, and TSH-suppressive L-thyroxine therapy with or without RTx after documented elimination of cervical iodine-131 uptake (http://msds-studie.uni-muenster.de). RESULTS: 311 patients were enrolled between January 2000 and March 2003. 279 patients met the trial's inclusion criteria. 45 consented to randomization, of whom 17 were randomized into treatment arm A (RTx) and 18 into arm B (no RTx). Advised by the trial's independent Data Monitoring and Safety Committee, the MSDS steering committee decided to terminate randomization in April 2003 and continue MSDS as a prospective cohort study. 23 of the 234 patients in the observation arm of the trial were prescribed RTx by their physicians. Thus, 14% of the trial cohort were randomized or assigned to receive RTx (in-tention-to-treat analysis). In contrast, at least 44% of all patients with pT4 papillary DTC in Germany in the nation-wide PCES study underwent RTx in 1996 (p <0.001, chi(2)-test). CONCLUSIONS: Acceptance of external beam RTx as a treatment modality for DTC has receded to a degree that accrual of a sufficient number of patients for a randomized trial has been impossible. Observation of the trial cohort is continued in order to assess clinical event rates with and without RTx and chronic RTx toxicity.

Combined Modality Therapy↗

PubMed2000

Some practical issues in the design, monitoring and analysis of a sequential randomized trial in pressure sore prevention.

A sequential double blind (assessor and patient) triangular design was used to compare the incidence of pressure sores following elective major surgery among patients lying on a standard foam mattress with those on a dry visco-elastic polymer pad during their operation. A total of 446 patients were recruited into the trial between 1994 and 1996. Interim analyses were carried out after 181 patients were entered into the trial and then subsequently after approximately every 100 patients recruited. The trial unexpectedly reached a stopping boundary at the first interim analysis, however the Independent Data Monitoring Committee recommended continuation of the trial. They were concerned that there was a need for a larger definitive trial and about an apparent treatment by centre interaction. They required a substudy to be undertaken to further validate the subjective endpoint, and that further sensitivity analyses of the main trail endpoint should be carried out in the second interim analysis. The trial was stopped at the third interim analysis when again a stopping boundary was crossed indicating that the gel pad was associated with significantly fewer pressure sores than the standard mattress (log odds ratio -0.7, (95 per cent confidence interval (CI), -1.28, -0.11), p=0.02) (estimate CI, p-value adjusted for group sequential conduct). The design, monitoring and analysis of this trial will be presented as an example of the practical problems or non-problems encountered for the local hospitals, for the trials unit, for the data monitoring committee and for the funding committee.

Beds↗

PubMed1995

Viral load in peripheral blood mononuclear cells as surrogate for clinical progression.

During the symposium on surrogate markers of HIV, the Scientific Advisory Committee posed the following question: "Which surrogate markers currently deserve the greatest commitment of investigative resources to validate them in a clinical setting?" The Committee concluded that for antiretroviral drugs measurements of HIV RNA in plasma deserve the greatest priority, and for immune-based therapies assessing viral load still had the highest priority. But it was recognized that assessing viral load should not be restricted to plasma RNA because the primary mechanisms of action are different from antiretroviral drugs. Thus, the Committee voted that based on current knowledge, investigating the clinical relevance of changes in HIV-1 DNA and RNA copy number in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) with validated assays should be given equal focus for immune-based therapies. This article reviews the rationale for using HIV-1 DNA and RNA load in PBMCs for the monitoring of clinical trials and presents recent data that indicate that the postseroconversion level and the dissemination of proviral DNA in the blood cells have prognostic value, i.e., high levels correlate with disease progression. In addition, longitudinal studies show that an increase in proviral DNA and/or HIV mRNA load correlates with disease progression. We present evidence that these markers are relevant activity markers for anti-HIV therapies. Changes in both DNA and RNA load can be achieved using either antiretroviral drugs or immune-based therapies. These results suggest that these markers should be evaluated in clinical studies to firmly establish their value as surrogates of clinical progression.

Biomarkers↗

PubMed2005

The African American Heart Failure Trial: a clinical trial update.

Progressive vascular and myocardial remodeling in heart failure is effectively slowed by therapy with neurohormonal antagonists, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-receptor blockers, aldosterone antagonists, and adrenergic-receptor blockers. These therapies, along with the correction of hemodynamic abnormalities, have dramatically reduced morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure. Endothelial dysfunction, increased oxidative stress, and decreased bioavailability of nitric oxide (NO) also occur in heart failure. Data suggest that endothelial dysfunction and reduced NO bioavailability may be more prevalent in populations who self-identify as African Americans. Thus, differences observed in the African American population with respect to prevalence of heart failure, etiology, outcomes, and response to medication may in part be explained by differences in the relative contributions of neurohormonal activation and diminished NO bioavailability to the progression of heart failure. The African American Heart Failure Trial (A-HeFT) was designed to assess the benefit of fixed-dose combination isosorbide dinitrate-hydralazine (ISDN-HYD) in an African American population with advanced heart failure. The A-HeFT enrolled 1,050 African American patients with New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III-IV heart failure with dilated ventricles and low ejection fractions. Patients were randomized to receive either a fixed-dose combination of ISDN-HYD or placebo added to standard neurohormonal blockade. The primary end point was a composite score in which mortality, hospitalization, and quality of life were weighted. On July 19, 2004, the independent Data Safety Monitoring Committee recommended early termination of the trial because of a significant mortality benefit in the cohort receiving fixed-dose ISDN-HYD. The A-HeFT confirms the benefit of fixed-dose ISDN-HYD, which may enhance NO bioavailability in African American patients with NYHA class III-IV heart failure and suggests that NO-enhancing therapy is an effective new treatment strategy for heart failure. In addition, the A-HeFT affirms the critical importance of the inclusion of population subgroups in clinical trials both as a way to probe for pathophysiologic mechanisms of disease and to devise optimal treatment strategies. The rich and unique A-HeFT database will provide new opportunities to understand the pathophysiology and management of heart failure.

Adult↗

PubMed1981

Organization of multicenter clinical trials.

The typical multicenter trial involves several clinical centers, a data center, and other specialty centers as well. A common structure for large-scale trials funded by the National Institutes of Health (NIH) involves two or three key committees. One of these is comprised exclusively of investigators from the study (steering committee) and is responsible for operation of the trial. A second committee, usually comprised of individuals not involved in the study, is responsible for overseeing the trial and providing advice to the NIH regarding the study. A third committee--sometimes part of the second committee and comprised largely of individuals not involved in the trial--is responsible for monitoring the study results for evidence of adverse or beneficial treatment effects as the trial proceeds. The organizational design of a trial may be as important as the experimental design is in the success of the trial. Attention to organizational questions at the start of the study and periodic review and revision of the structure as the trial proceeds can help identify problems before they become major impediments to progress in the trial. Such ongoing monitoring and periodic review is especially important in the long-term multicenter trial.

Centralized Hospital Services↗

PubMed1999

Failure of the competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate antagonist Selfotel (CGS 19755) in the treatment of severe head injury: results of two phase III clinical trials. The Selfotel Investigators.

OBJECT: Excessive activity of excitatory amino acids released after head trauma has been demonstrated to contribute to progressive injury in animal models and human studies. Several pharmacological agents that act as antagonists to the glutamate receptor have shown promise in limiting this progression. The efficacy of the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist Selfotel (CGS 19755) was evaluated in two parallel studies of severely head injured patients, defined as patients with post resuscitation Glasgow Coma Scale scores of 4 to 8. METHODS: A total of 693 patients were prospectively enrolled in two multicenter double-blind studies. Comparison between the treatment groups showed no significant difference with regard to demographic data, previous incidence of hypotension, and severity of injury. As the study progressed, the Safety and Monitoring Committee became concerned about possible increased deaths and serious brain-related adverse events in the treatment arm of the two head injury trials, as well as deaths in the two stroke trials being monitored concurrently. The Selfotel trials were stopped prematurely because of this concern and because an interim efficacy analysis indicated that the likelihood of demonstrating success with the agent if the studies had been completed was almost nil. CONCLUSIONS: Subsequently, more complete data analysis revealed no statistically significant difference in mortality rates in all cases between the two treatment groups in the head injury trials. In this report the authors examine the studies in detail and discuss the potential application of the data to future trial designs.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Islet xenotransplantation: are we really ready for clinical trials?

Four clinical trials of porcine islet transplantation have been reported, and there are verbal reports that clinical trials on much larger scales are continuing in centers in China and Russia. The four reported trials are briefly reviewed and, in the light of the present status of experimental islet xenotransplantation, consideration is given to whether such trials are currently justified. The Ethics Committee of the International Xenotransplantation Association has (1) emphasized the need for encouraging studies in non-human primates before clinical trials should be undertaken, (2) mandatory monitoring for the transfer of porcine microorganisms, and (3) careful regulation and oversight by recognized bodies. Other aspects of the topic, such as the need for informed consent, are briefly discussed. We conclude that, at the present time, more data documenting convincing efficacy, focused on clinically applicable immunosuppressive regimens, are needed to justify the initiation of closely monitored clinical trials. A clinical trial may then be justified even though the potential risk to the patients, and possibly for society, will not be zero.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Phase III study of chlorambucil versus fludarabine as initial therapy for Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and related disorders.

The WM1 study is a prospective randomized open-label study that includes patients with previously untreated Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia (WM), splenic lymphoma with villous lymphocytes (SLVL), and nonimmunoglobulin (Ig) M lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) who have an indication for treatment. At registration, patients are categorized as having WM, SLVL, or LPL, and these cohorts are to be analyzed separately. The aim of the study is to compare the efficacy of oral chlorambucil at a dose of 8 mg/m(2) (6 mg/m(2) for those > 75 years of age) for 10 days every 28 days to a maximum of 12 cycles with oral or intravenous (I.V.) fludarabine at a dose of 40 mg/m(2) orally or 25 mg/m(2) I.V. (30 mg/m(2)orally or 20 mg/m(2)I.V. for those > 75 years of age) for 5 days every 28 days to a maximum of 6 cycles. Primary endpoints are response to therapy and duration of response; secondary endpoints are improvement in hematologic parameters, toxicity of therapy, quality of life, and survival. To detect a difference in response rate of patients with WM of 15%, assuming that the overall response rates will be 50% to chlorambucil and 65% to fludarabine, with a power of 80%, requires the sample size of each group to be 183, indicating the need for collaboration among a number of national investigator groups. As of February 2005, accrual to the study stands at 143. Registration, randomization, and data collection are entirely Internet-based (www.waldenstroms.org), and the study is organized by an international collaboration, with a planned interim analysis and an external data monitoring committee.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1986

Quality control of biochemical data in the Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial: Central Laboratory.

The acquisition of quality biochemical data in the MRFIT was enhanced by writing detailed protocols, instituting strict rules for collecting and shipping specimens, setting high goals for analytical performance, using reliable means to transfer data, employing dedicated and competent analysts, and having a director of the Central Laboratory who believed in and enforced an effective quality control system. A Laboratory Quality Control Subcommittee was formed to work with this director in solving laboratory problems, with the Coordinating Center in conducting appropriate monitoring, with the Quality Control Committee in documenting the quality of data and investigating any laboratory problems, and with other committees of the directors and Program Office in responding to any questions raised about laboratory aspects of the trial. All of these efforts culminated in reliable biochemical data.

Cholesterol↗

PubMed1987

External monitoring of a data coordinating center: experience of the National Cooperative Gallstone Study.

A Biostatistical Monitoring Committee was established to review periodically the procedures and performance of the data coordinating center of the National Cooperative Gallstone Study. The functions of this committee, the types of data coordinating center activities reviewed, the manner in which monitoring of these activities was carried out, and an assessment of the value of this committee to the study are discussed in this article.

Chenodeoxycholic Acid↗

PubMed1991

Termination of the Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study of steroid therapy for systemic sepsis.

The Department of Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Program conducted a randomized, double-masked trial of steroid therapy versus placebo therapy for patients with systemic sepsis from 1983 to 1986. Treatment was initiated as soon as sepsis was recognized and before results of cultures confirmed infection. The original hypothesis was to test the effect of therapy on short-term (14-day) mortality in patients with gram-negative bacteremia. Because therapy had to begin before culture results were available, all septic patients had to be enrolled. Consequently, the study was modified to evaluate therapy in all patients with sepsis, and by post-stratification in those with gram-negative bacteremia. Patient enrollment was planned to continue for 3.5 years to achieve a sample size of 276 patients. After 223 patients were randomized, 14-day mortalities were 22% in the placebo-treated group versus 21% in the steroid-treated group (p = 0.97). In contrast, for the 51 patients with gram-negative bacteremia, mortalities were 27% placebo-treated versus 7% steroid-treated (p = 0.11). The Data Monitoring Board recommended continuation of the trial to evaluate what appeared to be an emerging gram-negative trend, but the Cooperative Studies Evaluation Committee decided to end the trial 12 months early because of the lack of efficacy in all septic patients. The reasons for the proposed extension and for the termination of the trial are presented. The more general problem of evaluating a biologically important subgroup imbedded in a large clinical trial is also discussed.

Bacterial Infections↗

PubMed2004

Time trends in personnel certification and turnover in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this analysis was to examine and quantify the coordinating center workload in regard to certification and turnover of clinical personnel who participated in the Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study (COMS). METHODS: The COMS was a set of multicenter, multidisciplinary randomized clinical trials conducted to evaluate radiotherapy for initial treatment of choroidal melanoma, a primary eye cancer. Patients were screened, enrolled, treated, and followed for mortality and clinical outcomes at 43 clinical centers in the United States and Canada, beginning late in 1986. Clinical centers were added to the COMS during three calendar periods. Training and certification of clinical personnel was performed by five resource centers and coordinated at the COMS coordinating center. A personnel database was maintained at the coordinating center for tracking certification progress, recertification, transfers and resignations. Certification records were analyzed for the period 1986 through 1998 when patient accrual and treatment were completed. RESULTS: Clinical personnel (929 individuals) were certified for one or more of nine distinct roles in the COMS, resulting in 1,342 certifications; 26% were certified for two or more positions. The total number certified for each role ranged from 114 to 208. Certifications per year ranged from 260 in 1987 to 35 in 1997. The certification workload at the coordinating center rose following addition of each group of new clinical centers. It also increased in 1995 as a result of recertification of current personnel mandated by the external data monitoring committee. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis documented that training and certification were continuing tasks, and not limited to initiation of the study. Resignations and reassignments of certified personnel were responsible for 642 decertifications.

Certification↗

PubMed2000

Pumactant and poractant alfa for treatment of respiratory distress syndrome in neonates born at 25-29 weeks' gestation: a randomised trial.

BACKGROUND: Exogenous surfactant preparations vary in their constitution and biophysical properties. Synthetic and animal-derived preparations lower the rate of death compared with controls. No significant differences in mortality or important long-term clinical outcomes have been shown between them in randomised trials. We did a randomised controlled trial to compare pumactant, a synthetic surfactant, with poractant alfa, an animal-derived surfactant, both of which are widely used in the UK. METHODS: We enrolled 212 neonates born between 25 weeks' and 29 weeks and 6 days' gestation who were intubated for presumed surfactant deficiency and were free from life-threatening malformations. We randomly assigned 105 neonates poractant alfa, and 107 pumactant. The primary outcome was duration of high-dependency care and mortality was a secondary outcome. Analysis was by intention to treat. FINDINGS: Outcome data were analysed for 199 babies. The trial was stopped on the recommendation of the data and safety monitoring committee because mortality assumed a greater importance than the primary outcome. Predischarge mortality differed significantly between groups, in favour of poractant alfa (14.1 vs 31.0%, p=0.006; odds ratio 0.37 [95% CI 0.18-0.76). This difference was sustained after adjustment for centre, gestation, birthweight, sex, plurality, and use of antenatal steroids. INTERPRETATION: Mortality was unexpectedly lower among neonates who received poractant alfa than among those who received pumactant, and was independent of all the variables we investigated. Stopping the trial early may have widened the difference between the treatment groups.

Cause of Death↗