SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

PubMed2005

Analysis of colorectal cancer occurrence during surveillance colonoscopy in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

BACKGROUND: Interval colorectal cancer (CRC) occasionally is detected in patients who have recently undergone colonoscopy. Systematic evaluation of CRC detected after colonoscopy could identify ways to improve the quality and the outcome of colonoscopy. METHODS: This study examined cancer diagnoses in the course of the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial, a randomized study of a dietary intervention on recurrence of adenomatous polyps. An algorithm was developed to classify each cancer into one of 4 etiologies: (1) incomplete removal (cancer at the site of previous adenoma), (2) failed biopsy detection (cancer in an area of suspected neoplasia with negative biopsy specimens), (3) missed cancer (large, advanced stage cancer found at a short interval after colonoscopy), or (4) new cancer (small, early stage cancer after a longer time interval). RESULTS: Of 2079 patients, 13 had cancer detected over 5810 person years of observation (PYO) (2.2 cases/1000 PYO); 7/13 or 53.8% of patients had either a potentially "avoidable" cancer or one detectable at an earlier time interval because of incomplete removal (4/13) or missed cancer (3/13). CONCLUSIONS: Interval cancer occurs despite colonoscopy. Improved quality of colonoscopy may have reduced cancer prevalence or resulted in earlier cancer detection in over 50% of prevalent cancers in the dietary Polyp Prevention Trial.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study.

BACKGROUND: The quality of colon cleansing is a major determinant of quality of colonoscopy. To our knowledge, the impact of bowel preparation on the quality of colonoscopy has not been assessed prospectively in a large multicenter study. Therefore, this study assessed the factors that determine colon-cleansing quality and the impact of cleansing quality on the technical performance and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy. METHODS: Twenty-one centers from 11 countries participated in this prospective observational study. Colon-cleansing quality was assessed on a 5-point scale and was categorized on 3 levels. The clinical indication for colonoscopy, diagnoses, and technical parameters related to colonoscopy were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 5832 patients were included in the study (48.7% men, mean age 57.6 [15.9] years). Cleansing quality was lower in elderly patients and in patients in the hospital. Procedures in poorly prepared patients were longer, more difficult, and more often incomplete. The detection of polyps of any size depended on cleansing quality: odds ratio (OR) 1.73: 95% confidence interval (CI)[1.28, 2.36] for intermediate-quality compared with low-quality preparation; and OR 1.46: 95% CI[1.11, 1.93] for high-quality compared with low-quality preparation. For polyps >10 mm in size, corresponding ORs were 1.0 for low-quality cleansing, OR 1.83: 95% CI[1.11, 3.05] for intermediate-quality cleansing, and OR 1.72: 95% CI[1.11, 2.67] for high-quality cleansing. Cancers were not detected less frequently in the case of poor preparation. CONCLUSIONS: Cleansing quality critically determines quality, difficulty, speed, and completeness of colonoscopy, and is lower in hospitalized patients and patients with higher levels of comorbid conditions. The proportion of patients who undergo polypectomy increases with higher cleansing quality, whereas colon cancer detection does not seem to critically depend on the quality of bowel preparation.

Aged↗

PubMed2005

A randomized single-blind trial of split-dose PEG-electrolyte solution without dietary restriction compared with whole dose PEG-electrolyte solution with dietary restriction for colonoscopy preparation.

BACKGROUND: Colonoscopy preparation regimens are poorly tolerated, requiring the use of a large volume of an unpalatable solution and diet restriction for adequate cleansing. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of two regimens of bowel preparation before colonoscopy: a whole dose of polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution (PEG-E), with diet restriction vs. a split dose with no diet restriction. METHODS: A total of 141 patients (ages 20-84 years, 81 men) were randomly assigned to receive either 4 L PEG-E, along with a liquid diet the day before colonoscopy (Group A) or 2 L PEG-E with a regular diet the day before colonoscopy followed by another 2 L PEG-E on the day of the procedure (Group B). The quality of the preparation was graded by the endoscopist (poor to excellent), who was blinded to the type of preparation. Tolerability of the assigned preparation and adverse effects were recorded by an independent investigator by using a questionnaire administered before colonoscopy. Intra- and interobserver variability was studied by using randomly chosen videotapes of colonoscopies performed as part of the study. RESULTS: There were 73 patients in Group A and 68 patients in Group B. The quality of the preparation was significantly better in Group B ( p = 0.011). The tolerability of the preparation regimen was not different overall between study groups in terms of side effects (except for bloating, which was more frequent in Group B, p = 0.039) or willingness to repeat the preparation. There was a nonsignificant trend toward improved adherence to the assigned preparation in favor of Group B ( p = 0.062). Inter- and intraobserver variability analysis showed good to excellent correlation among endoscopists. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic preparation with split-dose PEG-E and no dietary restriction provides better quality colon cleansing than whole-dose preparation, with no significant impact on patient tolerability and side effects.

Adult↗

PubMed1986

Carbon dioxide-insufflated colonoscopy: an ignored superior technique.

Colonoscopy and barium enema are complementary studies in the diagnosis of the cause of lower intestinal bleeding. The air usually insufflated during colonoscopy often makes it impossible to perform a good barium enema on the same day. As a possible solution to this problem, we studied the quality of barium enemas performed immediately following carbon dioxide-insufflated colonoscopy. All 15 patients who underwent unsuccessful total colonoscopies using carbon dioxide insufflation were able to have barium enemas performed the same day in contrast to only one out of 15 patients who had air-insufflated colonoscopy. In a survey of all hospitals in Illinois with 150 beds or more, we found only 15 of 146 hospitals used carbon dioxide for colonoscopy insufflation. We recommend the routine use of carbon dioxide for colonoscopic insufflation not only for greater safety and comfort for the patient, but also for the convenience and cost savings.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Technical proficiency of trainees performing colonoscopy: a learning curve.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We sought to provide an objective measure of the technical progress of trainees learning colonoscopy. GI fellows in our training program perform colonoscopy under supervision throughout their 2 years of fellowship. METHOD: The frequency of fellows reaching the cecum in less than 30 minutes was determined by one endoscopy instructor during the last 7 months of their first year of training and during the last 7 months of their second year. RESULTS: The mean success rate of reaching the cecum for seven first-year fellows was 54% (individual range, 25% to 86%). This compared with 86% for six second-year fellows (individual range, 73% to 93%) and with 97% for the endoscopy instructor when he did procedures without a fellow. First-year fellows during the 7-month "testing" periods believed they had reached the cecum in 5.7% of cases in which they had not. This was not a problem with second-year fellows. Counting colonoscopies done with all instructors in our program, fellows in this series each did an average of 149 colonoscopies during their first-year of training and 328 by the end of their second. CONCLUSIONS: Increasing proficiency in reaching the cecum occurs with experience over time, and continues even after completion of formal training. Individual trainees also seem to learn colonoscopy at different rates. Depending on how one defines competency, it is possible that the minimum threshold number for technical competency in colonoscopy of 100 procedures, as suggested by the ASGE, may be low.

Clinical Competence↗

PubMed2002

The role of sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy in the diagnosis and management of lower gastrointestinal disorders: endoscopic findings, therapy, and complications.

Flexible sigmoidoscopy and colonoscopy have revolutionized the clinical management of colonic diseases. Colonoscopy is a highly sensitive and specific test. Colonic diseases often produce characteristic colonoscopic findings, as well as characteristic histologic findings, as identified in colonoscopic biopsy or polypectomy specimens. Colonoscopy is relatively safe, with a low incidence of serious complications, such as colonic perforation, hemorrhage, cardiopulmonary arrest, or sepsis. Colonoscopy is becoming more important clinically because of more widespread use of screening colonoscopy for colon cancer, application of therapeutic colonoscopy, and exciting new technical improvements.

Angiodysplasia↗

PubMed2001

Virtual colonoscopy: the endoscopist's point of view.

The major advantage of virtual colonoscopy is that it might increase acceptance of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Its disadvantages are high costs and unknown sensitivity and specificity if widely applied. It might replace colonoscopy to a substantial degree only if no bowel preparation is necessary. Gastroenterologists have to include virtual colonoscopy as a complementary method to colonoscopy. Virtual colonoscopy may increase the ratio of therapeutic colonoscopies compared with simple "diagnostic" procedures.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

PubMed2004

Colonoscopy effects on serum prostate specific antigen levels.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate the colonoscopy effects on serum levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA) and PSA ratio. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Thirty men were studied (median age 68 years, range 32-89). All of them had their serum PSA (total and free) measured 24 hours prior to colonoscopy and also 24 hours, 7 and 30 days after procedure. RESULTS: 14 of 30 (47%) patients, had significantly (p = 0.045) increased Total PSA levels 24 hours after the procedure, 14 (47%) patients had insignificantly (p = 0.139) increased levels 7 days after, while 13 (43%) of them had insignificantly (p = 0.061) increased levels 30 days after colonoscopy. In 7 patients (23%), with total PSA levels in the "gray zone" (4-10 ng/ml) before colonoscopy, a near significant (p = 0.063) raise in PSA ratio was also observed 24 hours after. CONCLUSION: Flexible colonoscopy affect serum PSA (free and total) levels in certain patients. Special attention must be given to those patients with PSA levels in the "gray zone" before colonoscopy.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Predictive factors by multivariate analysis for colorectal cancer in Malaysian patients undergoing colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: The majority of colorectal cancers are still diagnosed in patients who present with symptoms especially in countries where colorectal screening programs are not practised. The aim of our study was to determine the predictive factors for colorectal cancer in patients referred for colonoscopy. METHODS: A prospective study of 485 consecutive patients who underwent colonoscopy during a 22-month period was performed. All patients answered a detailed questionnaire. Indications for colonoscopy and the findings were recorded. RESULTS: The mean age of the study population was 55.7 +/- 14.7 years. There were 221 (45.6%) males and 264 (54.4%) females. Sixty-five (13.4%) were Malays, 298 (61.4%) were Chinese and 112 (23.1%) were Indians. Multiple backward stepwise regression analysis revealed that independent predictors for colorectal cancer (odds ratio [95% CI]) were the presence of rectal bleeding (4.3 [4.0-8.0]) and iron deficiency anemia (4.0 [3.6-10.2]). In those aged 50 and over, male gender (4.5 [2.2-9.3]) and abdominal pain (3.1 [1.4-6.7]) were also significant positive predictors of cancer. CONCLUSIONS: With the ever-increasing demand for gastrointestinal endoscopy, the appropriate utilization of colonoscopy is essential to afford prompt patient evaluation. Our study supports the need to prioritize the use of colonoscopy in patients with rectal bleeding and iron deficiency anemia. In the older patient where the background prevalence of colorectal cancer is higher, referral for colonoscopy is also justified.

Anemia, Iron-Deficiency↗

PubMed2002

Virtual colonoscopy for the detection of colorectal polyps and cancers in a Chinese population.

AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the sensitivity of virtual colonoscopy in detecting colorectal polyps and cancers in a Chinese population. METHODS: Seventy-one consecutive Chinese patients (38 men and 33 women) referred for diagnostic colonoscopy were recruited. Patients received a routine bowel preparation in the morning followed by a helical abdominal computed tomography (CT) scan with air insufflation of the colon. The CT images were then processed by using surface-rendered software and interpreted by a single radiologist who was blinded to the clinical information. Colonoscopy was performed in the same afternoon without knowledge of the radiology results. All polyps and cancers were proven histologically. RESULTS: Five colorectal cancers were diagnosed and all were detected by virtual colonoscopy. The sensitivity and specificity of virtual colonoscopy for the detection of patients with polyps of all sizes, and patients with polyps >/=10 mm were 59, 92, 88 and 100%, respectively. The procedure was well tolerated by all patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study was carried out in a real clinical setting without a preselection of cases. Virtual colonoscopy was satisfactory for the detection of polyps greater than 10 mm, and for the diagnosis of cancer, and it is also a promising imaging modality for colorectal neoplasm detection in a Chinese population.

Colonic Polyps↗

PubMed2004

Technical performance of colonoscopy in patients sedated with nurse-administered propofol.

OBJECTIVES: Nurse-administered propofol has gained attention as a safe and effective means of sedation for patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. However, little is known about the effect of propofol on the technical performance of colonoscopy. METHODS: Three separate studies were conducted. In the first study, we reviewed procedure notes from consecutive colonoscopies performed by a single experienced endoscopist at our hospital endoscopy unit on patients sedated with either nurse-administered propofol (n = 162) or midazolam/narcotic (n = 164). In the second study, 100 eligible colonoscopy outpatients were randomized to receive either nurse-administered propofol (n = 50) or midazolam/fentanyl (n = 50). In both studies, the measured parameters included visualization of the cecum, time required to reach the cecum, repositioning of the patient, and the application of abdominal counterpressure. In a third study, we reviewed the rate of cecal intubation and colonic perforation in the first 2357 patients in our unit receiving nurse-administered propofol. RESULTS: In the retrospective comparative study, there was no difference in the cecal intubation rate in those receiving propofol (99.4%) compared to those receiving midazolam/narcotic (97%; p= 0.1), and three of five failed cecal intubations in the latter group resulted from obstructing masses. Patients sedated with propofol were repositioned less frequently compared to those receiving midazolam/narcotic (3.7%vs 26.2%) (p < 0.0001). Abdominal pressure was employed in 9.9% of patients sedated with propofol compared to 19.5% (p= 0.01) of those given midazolam/narcotic. The mean time to reach the cecum was lower in the propofol group than in the midazolam/narcotic group (4.6 min vs 6.0 min, p= 0.002). In the prospective randomized study, the endoscopist intubated the cecum in all 100 patients. Patients in the propofol group were repositioned less frequently than those in the midazolam/fentanyl group (2%vs 24%, respectively, p= 0.001). The number of cases requiring abdominal counterpressure was not significantly different between the propofol and midazolam/fentanyl groups (12%vs 24%, respectively, p= 0.1). The mean time to reach the cecum in the propofol group (3.2 min) was similar to that in the midazolam/fentanyl group (3.8 min, p= 0.08). Among the first 2357 patients in our unit undergoing colonoscopy with nurse-administered propofol, the rate of complete colonoscopy was 99.2% and there were no perforations. CONCLUSION: Nurse-administered propofol sedation is safe and simplifies the technical performance of colonoscopy compared to midazolam/narcotic sedation.

Analgesics, Opioid↗

PubMed2006

Guidelines for colonoscopy surveillance after polypectomy: a consensus update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society.

Adenomatous polyps are the most common neoplastic findings discovered in people who undergo colorectal screening or who have a diagnostic work-up for symptoms. It was common practice in the 1970s for these patients to have annual follow-up surveillance examinations to detect additional new adenomas and missed synchronous adenomas. As a result of the National Polyp Study report in 1993, which showed clearly in a randomized design that the first postpolypectomy examination could be deferred for 3 years, guidelines published by a gastrointestinal consortium in 1997 recommended that the first follow-up surveillance take place 3 years after polypectomy for most patients. In 2003 these guidelines were updated and colonoscopy was recommended as the only follow-up examination, stratification at baseline into low risk and higher risk for subsequent adenomas was suggested. The 1997 and 2003 guidelines dealt with both screening and surveillance. However, it has become increasingly clear that postpolypectomy surveillance is now a large part of endoscopic practice, draining resources from screening and diagnosis. In addition, surveys have shown that a large proportion of endoscopists are conducting surveillance examinations at shorter intervals than recommended in the guidelines. In the present report, a careful analytic approach was designed to address all evidence available in the literature to delineate predictors of advanced pathology, both cancer and advanced adenomas, so that patients can be stratified more definitely at their baseline colonoscopy into those at lower risk or increased risk for a subsequent advanced neoplasia. People at increased risk have either 3 or more adenomas, high-grade dysplasia, villous features, or an adenoma 1 cm or larger in size. It is recommended that they have a 3-year follow-up colonoscopy. People at lower risk who have 1 or 2 small (<1 cm) tubular adenomas with no high-grade dysplasia can have a follow-up evaluation in 5-10 years, whereas people with hyperplastic polyps only should have a 10-year follow-up evaluation, as for average-risk people. There have been recent studies that have reported a significant number of missed cancers by colonoscopy. However, high-quality baseline colonoscopy with excellent patient preparation and adequate withdrawal time should minimize this and reduce clinicians concerns. These guidelines were developed jointly by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer and the American Cancer Society to provide a broader consensus and thereby increase the use of the recommendations by endoscopists. The adoption of these guidelines nationally can have a dramatic impact on shifting available resources from intensive surveillance to screening. It has been shown that the first screening colonoscopy and polypectomy produces the greatest effects on reducing the incidence of colorectal cancer in patients with adenomatous polyps.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed2000

Virtual endoscopy--comparison with colonoscopy in the detection of space-occupying lesions of the colon.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: A new technique has been described which combines abdominal helical computed tomography (CT) scanning and virtual reality computer technology, known as virtual colonoscopy (VC); the reconstructed images provide a simulation of the interior of the colon as viewed by endoscopy. We compared VC with conventional colonoscopy in patients with suspected or known colonic neoplasia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 38 patients, in whom there was a high likelihood of colonic polyps or cancer, underwent a noncontrast helical CT scan of the abdomen and pelvis after regular colonoscopy bowel preparation. The images were reconstructed into a VC presentation and compared with the subsequent conventional colonoscopy in a blinded manner. RESULTS: Conventional colonoscopy identified a total of 24 polyps 5 mm or greater. VC correctly identified five of 13 polyps 5-9 mm in size, and ten of 11 lesions greater than or equal to 10 mm in diameter. The reasons for four missed lesions were identified as being secondary to a collapsed rectum in two patients and stool in the right colon in two patients. The sensitivity and specificity per patient of VC for lesions greater than or equal to 5 mm were 66.7% and 75.0% respectively, and for lesions greater than 1 cm were 90.0% and 82.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Virtual colonoscopy is feasible, well tolerated, and capable of detecting most lesions greater than 10 mm in diameter. This technique is continuing to be developed and warrants further evaluation as a diagnostic and screening tool in colorectal neoplasia.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

[Splenic trauma--a rare complication during colonoscopy].

The less frequent complications of colonoscopy include pneumothorax, pneumoperitoneum, emphysema of the retroperitoneum or of the subcutis, septicemia and injuries of visceral organs (mainly the spleen). Since the mid 1970 s more than 30 splenic injuries during colonoscopy have been described. Any cause of increased splenocolic adhesions (inflammatory bowel disease, pancreatitis or prior abdominal surgery) might be a predisposing factor for splenic injury during colonoscopy. Other contributing factors are techniques that result in a strong torsion of the spleno-colic ligament. Patients with left shoulder and abdominal pain, hypotension, and a drop in hemoglobin without rectal bleeding after colonoscopy should be suspected to have splenic injury. Many physicians are not aware of splenic injuries as a potential complication of colonoscopy. Therefore the diagnosis of splenic injury during colonoscopy is often described in the literature as delayed (hours until 10 days). Since a colonoscopic splenic injury can be fatal, this exceedindly rare event must be considered when a patient shows the above-mentioned symptoms and no signs of colon perforation.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed2005

Oil-lubricated colonoscopy: easier and less painful?

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Methods of lubrication are rarely considered to be a matter for study in gastrointestinal endoscopy. We evaluated a new technique, i. e. the release of seed oil in discrete amounts from the tip of the scope during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 346 consecutive patients prospectively underwent colonoscopy with a standard lubricating method (using water-soluble jelly; group A) or with the standard method plus seed oil (corn oil) instillations through the biopsy channel (group B). The following variables were evaluated in the two groups: the success rate for total intubation, and the time required to reach the cecum; the time needed to examine the colon at withdrawal; the detection rates for colorectal diseases; the level of pain and degree of difficulty associated with the examination. Patients in whom total colonoscopy was not achieved were asked to undergo a further examination in which the other lubricating technique was used. RESULTS: Successful intubation to the cecum was significantly more frequent ( P < 0.005) in the oil lubrication group (group B, 159/168) than in the control group (group A, 145/170), and less time was needed ( P < 0.001). No significant differences were found with regard to time for examination at withdrawal and detection rates for colorectal diseases. Level of pain and degree of difficulty during colonoscopy were significantly lower in the oil group ( P < 0.001). In the cross-over examinations done in patients in whom total colonoscopy was not achieved, no statistical difference was found between the two groups. We observed no side effects for patients or damage to the instrument. CONCLUSIONS: The proposed technique could be a simple, safe, and inexpensive method for easier and less painful colonoscopy; moreover, it might facilitate difficult examinations. Further studies are needed to confirm our data and to ensure that the use of this technique is not liable to damage the scope.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Diagnostic yield of advanced colorectal neoplasia at colonoscopy, according to indications: an investigation from the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases (KASID).

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The factors that more accurately predict the detection of colorectal cancers and adenomas at colonoscopy are different. We conducted a prospective multicenter study to evaluate which indications were most closely associated with advanced colorectal neoplasm (CRN), including colorectal cancer, in a group of patients undergoing colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 17 468 patients were enrolled in this study between July 2003 and March 2004, from 11 tertiary medical centers in Korea. They were recruited according to 11 itemized colonoscopic indications. The term "advanced adenoma" refers here to tubular adenomas of diameter of 11 mm or more, or to tubulovillous, villous, or severely dysplastic adenomas, irrespective of their size. Cancer was defined as the invasion of malignant cells beyond the muscularis mucosa. Advanced CRN was defined as advanced adenoma or invasive cancer. RESULTS: Advanced CRN was found in 1227/17 307 patients (1176 advanced adenomas plus 51 carcinomas, 7.1 %). According to univariate and multivariate analysis, the factors associated with advanced CRN included age >60 years (odds ratio (OR) 2.1, 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.8 - 2.4, P < 0.0001), male gender (OR 2.1, 95 %CI 1.7 - 2.7, P < 0.0001), referral for colonoscopy from primary care physician (OR 3.1, 95 %CI 2.5 - 3.7, P < 0.0001), and several other indications (OR 1.8, 95 %CI 1.5 - 2.3, P < 0.001). The yield of colonoscopy for advanced CRN was lower (2.2 %) than expected in patients with iron-deficiency anemia (OR 0.5, 95 %CI 0.2 - 0.9, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Age, gender, and referral for colonoscopy from primary care physician constituted important independent predictors of advanced CRN in patients undergoing colonoscopy.

Adenoma↗

PubMed1997

Colonic perforation due to colonoscopy: a retrospective study of 48 cases.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The aim of this retrospective study was to analyze data on the treatment of 48 cases of colonic perforation, with a view to defining the criteria for choosing between medical and surgical treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire requesting information about complications of colonoscopy and their treatment was sent out to four hospital gastroenterological and surgical units. RESULTS: From January 1979 to December 1993, we reviewed the records of 48 cases of colonic perforation following colonoscopy (24 perforations occurred after diagnostic colonoscopy and 24 after therapeutic colonoscopy). Diagnosis of perforation was delayed in 42% of the patients, with a mean delay of two days (range 0.5-7 days). The treatment was surgical in 35 cases, including eight in which previous medical treatment had been unsuccessful. The perforation was in the sigmoid colon in 74% of the surgical population. Operations were carried out using two procedures, including colostomy, in the case of 20 patients (57%). Colostomy closure was performed in 12 patients (60%) with no mortalities. Surgical mortality occurred in five patients (14%), in four cases due to preexisting medical diseases. Medical treatment was attempted in 21 cases, and was successful in 13, mainly in cases in which perforation had occurred after therapeutic colonoscopy (12 patients). CONCLUSION: The choice of the right type of treatment for colonoscopic perforation seems to depend on the size of the lesion. Surgical treatment is appropriate when the perforation has occurred during diagnostic colonoscopy, since the lesion in this case is usually a large colonic laceration, whereas nonsurgical treatment seems to be justified after polypectomy, as long as there is rapid clinical improvement.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Nitrous oxide: a valuable alternative for pain relief and sedation during routine colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Patient-administered nitrous oxide in 50% oxygen has lately come into use as an alternative to combined opioid and benzodiazepine medication for colonoscopic procedures. A randomized study was carried out comparing intramuscular pethidine hydrochloride 1 mg/kg with inhalation of Medimix (a mixture of nitrous oxide in oxygen 50%) for relief of pain and anxiety during colonoscopy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients (19 in the pethidine group and 19 in the nitrous oxide group) were studied. The following parameters were measured: blood pressure, pulse rate, and arterial oxygen saturation. At the end of the colonoscopy and before the patients left the ward, pain, nausea, and general well-being were evaluated by the patients using a visual analogue scale. The colonoscopy time, investigation conditions and the total length of hospital stay were registered. RESULTS: Colonoscopy time and the colonoscopists' opinions concerning the investigation conditions did not differ between the groups. Pain relief and patient evaluation of the total procedure were also equal between the patient groups. However, there was less nausea among the Medimix patients. Three patients in the pethidine group had oxygen saturations below 92%. There was no desaturation during and five minutes after colonoscopy in the Medimix group. Patients in the Medimix group left the hospital on average 34 minutes earlier than patients in the pethidine group. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of nitrous oxide (Medimix) as an analgesic is as good as pethidine for colonoscopy. Medimix has clear advantages compared to pethidine in terms of reducing nausea and shortening the hospital stay.

Adult↗