PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Delphi Technique”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Telephone nurses' experience of problems with telephone advice in Sweden.

By telephoning a healthcare call centre, individuals in Sweden can consult a nurse to discuss medical problems and health care accessibility, and to receive professional information on how to find their way about the health care system. The aim of the study was to identify problems, difficulties and disadvantages that telephone nurses with varying degrees of experience had met during their professional careers. The Delphi technique was used with three sets of questionnaires. Twenty-five nurses with varying experience of working with telephone advice from six 24-hours call centres participated in the study. The response rate was 100%. An open-ended question generated 154 statements. Comments were categorized into 24 different problem categories. Ten problem categories were mainly related to the nurse perspective, i.e. the problems experienced were associated with the qualities of the nurse, eight principally to the patient perspective, i.e. problems associated with caller characteristics and six mostly to the organizational perspective, i.e. problems linked to the organization of the national health service. 'Lack of health care resources' was rated as the biggest problem, 'second-hand consultations' as the second and 'always making a decision' as the third biggest problem. Decision-making seems to be the core of telephone advice nursing and problems related to the nurses, patients and organization seem to influence the telephone nurses' working situation. Training should focus on active listening and handling social conflicts.

Adult↗

Hospital restructuring and the changing nature of the physical therapist's role.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: This study was conducted to identify role behavior changes of acute care physical therapists and changes in the organizational and professional context of hospitals following restructuring. METHODS: A Delphi technique, which involved a panel of 100 randomly selected acute care physical therapy managers, was used as the research design for this study. Responses from rounds 1 and 2 were synthesized and organized into exhaustive and mutually exclusive categories for round 3. Data obtained from round 3 were used to develop a comprehensive perspective on the changes that have occurred. RESULTS: Changed role behaviors in patient care and professional interaction, including increased emphasis on evaluation, planning, teaching, supervising, and collaboration, appeared to be extensions of unchanged role behaviors. Reported changes in the structural and professional context of physical therapy services included using critical pathways to guide care, providing services system-wide, and using educational activities and meetings to maintain a sense of community. The importance of professionalism to physical therapists' work was identified and related to specific role behavior changes. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The changing role of physical therapists in acute care hospitals includes an increased emphasis on higher-level skills in patient care and professional interaction and the continuing importance of professionalism.

Adult↗

Identifying outcomes from the nursing outcomes classification as indicators of quality of care in Korea: a modified delphi study.

BACKGROUND: The evaluation of patient outcomes as a measure of quality control of patient care is being adopted in Korean hospitals. Since nursing care contributes to the bulk of patient care, it is important to identify nursing-sensitive patient outcomes, hereafter referred to as 'nursing outcomes', that will be useful in the evaluation of nursing care. OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to identify nursing outcomes included within the Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) that are most sensitive for the evaluation of nursing care in Korean hospitals as well as being observable and measurable. DESIGN: Delphi technique modified for this study was used to gain a consensus from Korean nursing experts. SETTINGS: Participants were recruited from general hospitals in Korea. PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred and thirty nurses working for Quality Improvement (QI) and Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI) programmes were chosen as the nurse experts for this study. METHODS: Three rounds of data collection from all participants was undertaken. In the first data collection, the sensitivity of 260 NOC nursing outcomes (Johnson, et al., 2000. Iowa Outcomes Projects: Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC). C.V. Mosby, St. Louis) was examined, and more highly nursing sensitive ones were selected. In the second and third data collection phases, nursing outcomes which are most useful for the evaluation of nursing care were selected. RESULTS: Vital Signs Status, Knowledge: Infection Control, Pain Control, Safety Behavior: Fall Prevention, and Infection Status were identified as the five most useful nursing outcomes for the evaluation of nursing care in hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The nursing outcomes identified highly useful for the evaluation of nursing care in this study can be used effectively for the quality management of nursing care in Korea.

Adult↗

[Opinion on health priorities in the community of Valencia].

In this study we have used a qualitative approach partially based on the Delphi technique to establish the ten priorities for health in the Valencian Community for the next five years. Two rounds of mail surveys were made sending questionnaires to 1834 people including Health Councillors of the Town Halls, nurses and doctors of the three valencian provinces. The overall response rate was 28.3%. The priorities which were perceived as most important by the respondents were the development of primary care, improvements in the management of health services and the development of preventive medicine. The fourth and fifth places of the ranking were: improvements of emergency services and increasing the budget devoted to hospital care. The 6th priority was preventive measures in cardiovascular diseases, the 7th actions against drug abuse, the 8th special attention to childhood and ageing populations and the last two priorities were protection of the environment and infectious diseases prevention. We consider this approach as useful to obtain additional valuable information complementary to the information obtained from traditional statistics or health surveys specially in the areas of management, diseases prevention and actions towards special groups of population.

Delphi Technique↗

What factors contribute to senior psychiatry residents' interest in geriatric psychiatry? a Delphi study.

OBJECTIVE: To generate hypotheses regarding factors that influence senior psychiatric residents, to consider treating geriatric patients in their future practices. METHOD: Using the Delphi technique, designed to generate ideas and consensus, we asked psychiatry residents at the University of Toronto who had completed, or were completing, their geriatric rotation about the factors they thought might influence residents in devoting some of their practice to geriatric patients. Residents then rated the degree of influence of these factors which had been synthesized into a questionnaire. RESULTS: Twenty-six items were rated according to their degree of influence. The most influential item was positive clinical experiences with seniors. This was followed closely by supervisor characteristics such as enthusiasm, role modeling, competence, and mentoring. Interest in and comfort with the medical psychiatric and neuropsychiatric nature of the field were also felt to be influential. CONCLUSIONS: The factors that influence senior psychiatry resident interest in the practice of geriatric psychiatry are primarily educational and result from exposure to the field under optimal educational circumstances (positive clinical experiences and excellent supervisors). The medical and neuropsychiatric nature of the field also likely exerts a unique influence and should be considered in stimulating interest in this population.

Adult↗

[Health education on menopause: consensus on its contents].

OBJECTIVE: To define the standard knowledge women should have about the menopause in order to confront this stage successfully. DESIGN: Use of the Delphi technique to reach consensus with experts at a national level. PARTICIPANTS: 43 professionals were chosen from the biological, psychological and social health fields, who had professional experience in women's problems at this stage of their lives, and/or authors of books, articles, doctoral theses and other documents on the menopause. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Through three mailings, we obtained the views of 37 (86.04%) of the experts about the knowledge a woman should have of the menopause and the importance attached to each facet of this knowledge. Combining both criteria enabled us to classify the 266 Conceptual Elements (CE) that were expressed into three categories according to their relevance to women's knowledge. CONCLUSION: The Conceptual Framework on the Menopause is made up of a total of 173 CE, structured in 4 dimensions: biological aspects (23.12%), psychological and social aspects (24.8%), health risks (10.98%), and care, prevention and health promotion activities concerning the menopause (41.4%). This last dimension contained the highest percentage of specially relevant material (47.88% Level I CE).

Delphi Technique↗

Delphi study to identify core competencies in geriatric dentistry.

The Delphi technique and an expert panel of general practitioners were used to identify geriatric dentistry core competencies--the necessary knowledge, skills, and values of new graduates to meet the oral health needs of older patients. Of the 74 dentists solicited, 50 dentists agreed to participate, and 40 dentists returned two questionnaires. Respondents were mostly male, white, in solo practice, with a mean age of 51.6 (SD 7.4) years. The first survey asked the participants to identify at least three topics in geriatric dentistry that they believed to be essential to a dental curriculum to graduate competent practitioners who can effectively treat older patients. The 45 unique responses were used in the second questionnaire that asked the practitioners to rate the importance of each topic for inclusion in a curriculum. For the 29 items describing skills, respondents indicated how often they performed the skill in their practices. Finally, the respondents considered all 45 items, and selected the five most crucial topics. Overall, participants achieved good consensus as to core knowledge, skills, and values needed to provide general dental care to older patients.

Clinical Competence↗

Purchasing oncology services. Kerr L. White Institute/American Cancer Society Task Force on Purchasing Oncology Services.

BACKGROUND: A multidisciplinary panel representing various stakeholders in the health care delivery and oncology services marketplace was convened to develop specific criteria for healthcare purchasers to consider when evaluating the structures and processes of health plans. These rank ordered criteria also can be used by oncologic service providers and health plan designers as a yardstick for the services they offer. METHODS: A multidisciplinary 31-member Task Force was assembled by the Kerr L. White Institute and the American Cancer Society in March 1997. Task Force members were selected for their ability to offer expert insight as purchasers, suppliers, policymakers, consumers, or stakeholders in the health care marketplace. A preference-weighted majority voting rule was used to identify the three most important recommendations of the 10 that were generated through a modified Delphi technique. To test the practicality of the top three recommendations, leaders of large managed care organizations (MCOs) were surveyed; the results of this survey then were compared with the results of the Task Force survey. RESULTS: The three most important recommendations from the Task Force were that health plans provide access to: 1) comprehensive cancer care, 2) preventive and screening services, and 3) second opinions and treatment options supported by scientific evidence. The difference between the responses of the Task Force and the MCOs was that MCOs placed the highest importance on evidence-based decision-making, with their next three rankings coinciding with those identified by the Task Force. CONCLUSIONS: The value of these summary recommendations will be realized through their use by both purchasers and suppliers to influence the structure and content of the delivery of oncologic services.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗

Delphi survey of experts' opinions on strategies used by community pharmacists to reduce over-the-counter drug misuse.

AIM: To explore the views of experts within the fields of pharmacy and addiction on the value of current strategies and possible alternatives and to reach an agreement on best practice in the sale of over-the-counter (OTC) medicines which are liable to misuse. DESIGN: Using a modified Delphi approach, an anonymous, international, three-stage, postal questionnaire was conducted that generated both qualitative and quantitative data. PARTICIPANTS: Of those contacted by telephone (164) from the United Kingdom, Australia, Canada, New Zealand and United States, 109 experts (66%) agreed to take part. Forty-three per cent (47/109) completed all three stages of the study. MEASUREMENTS: A Delphi technique was employed to gather data. The second and final questionnaires were constructed from the responses to the preceding questionnaires. Content analysis of the qualitative data was carried out at each stage. Statistical analyses of the influence of demographic factors, degree of shift in overall opinion between the first and second stages and degree of agreement between respondents at each stage were also conducted. FINDINGS: A consensus was reached on the strategies considered the most important and effective. Key areas include improving access to current information, improved staff training, addressing the issues of non-pharmacy outlets and Internet pharmacy sites. Concerns were expressed regarding the possible conflict between commercial and customer interests. CONCLUSIONS: The consensus view presented offers practical and realistic guidance for policy-makers and community pharmacists on the sale of OTC products. It reflects the best evidence to date of expert views in this area and accords with current UK guidelines. The effective implementation of these strategies can only be achieved with improved communication and coordination at local and national level.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Research priorities for burn nursing. Report of the Wound Care and Infection Control Group.

This study was designed to identify research priorities in burn nursing. The Delphi technique of sequential questionnaires was used for data collection. Ninety-four participants completed four rounds of questionnaires. One hundred one research questions were identified and prioritized according to impact on the welfare of patients with burns and impact on the profession of burn nursing. Twenty-three of these research questions concerned issues of wound care or infection control. This group of questions was further analyzed to determine priority research issues. The five most highly ranked questions in the category of wound care/infection control with regard to impact on patient welfare concerned healing of donor sites and skin grafts, wound cleansing, and the effect of pressure garments on wound healing. Similarly, the five most highly ranked questions with regard to impact on the profession of burn nursing concerned the impact of combining patients with burns and patients without burns in the same unit, healing of donor sites and skin grafts, care of the patient with burns who also has acquired immune deficiency syndrome, infection control, and dressing of the burn wound.

Algorithms↗

Indicators of organizational readiness for clinical information technology/systems innovation: a Delphi study.

The study presented in this article represents the second phase in a multi-phased research program focused on health care organization readiness for clinical information technology/system (IT/S) innovation. The overall purposes of this exploratory study were to: (1) validate the seven IT/S innovation readiness sub-dimensions of a heuristic organizational information technology/systems innovation model (OITIM) developed in phase one of the research program, and (2) identify indicators to assess the validated sub-dimensions. The study was conducted with an expert panel using a two-round modified Delphi technique. In Round #1, panelists supported retention of the OITIMs' seven theoretical IT/S innovation readiness sub-dimensions with an interrater agreement level range of 82-100%. Their sub-dimension importance ratings ranged from 3.27 to 3.72 (1=not important to 4=critically important) with the resources sub-dimension receiving the highest rating of 3.72. Panelists recommended that two sub-dimensions, 'Staffing and Skills' and 'Operations', be renamed to 'End-Users' and 'Management Structures', respectively, and that one sub-dimension, 'Administrative Support' be added. In Round #2, panelists identified a total of 316 indicators to assess the eight sub-dimensions. A two-step thematic analysis process was done with these indicators to reduce duplication and overlap. In Step 1, the investigator created ten preliminary theme categories per sub-dimension. In Step 2, a coding team categorized 279 (88%) of the 316 indicators into preliminary sub-dimension themes to create an organizational IT/S innovation readiness assessment taxonomy. This preliminary taxonomy was used to develop an organizational information technology/systems innovation readiness scale that is currently being pilot tested in phase three of the research program.

Delphi Technique↗

What role does occupational and environmental health law have in graduate and continuing medical education?

A two-stage survey that used the Delphi technique was performed to determine the attitudes and needs of physicians that practice occupational and environmental medicine (OEM) regarding continuing medical education (CME) and Master of Public Health (MPH) curriculum in the area of health law. Forty-six of the 80 subjects (58%) responded to the first survey, and 39 of these 46 (85%) responded to the follow-up survey. The results showed that most subjects agreed with the need for CME to devote approximately 14 hours over the next two years (1993-1995) to occupational/environmental health laws and regulations. Interest was also expressed in some practical business law that would be helpful to medical practices. The survey's results showed agreement on the need for a three-credit hour MPH course for OEM residents. The differences between the subgroups of academic faculty-post-1990 graduates of MPH or occupational medicine residencies, pre-1990 graduates, and those with no formal OEM education-were also investigated. Pre-1990 graduates consistently desired more hours of CME for the topics surveyed. This study should be helpful for planners of OEM CME courses and for residency directors.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Identifying labor support actions of intrapartum nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To identify specific nursing actions that best characterize labor support from the nurse's perspective. DESIGN: A descriptive survey design using a three-round Delphi technique was used to explore the views of intrapartum nurses in the United States related to labor support. PARTICIPANTS: Five hundred AWHONN members who identified themselves as intrapartum nurses were invited to participate in the survey. One hundred eighty-six nurses agreed to participate. Participants who submitted usable surveys in each round: round one, n = 166; round two, n = 115; and round three, n = 117. Eighty-seven nurses participated in all three rounds of the survey. RESULTS: The participants identified 55 specific nursing actions as supportive care. These interventions ranged from psychosocial support such as remaining with the mother if she is fearful to physical support measures such as position changes. The nurses clearly distinguished between supportive nursing care and the assessment and technical aspects of their job. The nurses also identified the overall goals of intrapartum nursing were to assure a safe outcome for the newborn (82.8% of participants) and for the mother (75% of participants). CONCLUSIONS: The supportive actions identified by this panel of intrapartum nurses were similar to ones identified by mothers in other studies. Nurses made a clear distinction between supportive nursing care and assessment skills or technical tasks.

Delphi Technique↗

Are NHS primary care performance indicator scores acceptable as markers of general practitioner quality?

BACKGROUND: In 2002 the Department of Health published a list of 20 indicators to judge the performance of the 302 primary care organisations (PCOs) in England during 2001-2002. General practitioners (GPs) have expressed doubts about the relevance, applicability and evidence base of these indicators for actual practice. AIMS: To fashion NHS performance indicators to be acceptable and relevant to practicing GPs. DESIGN OF STUDY: A Delphi technique followed by simple mathematical modelling. METHODS: We asked a group of 24 senior GP educators to place the Department of Health performance indicators in rank order as markers of quality in general practice. We found just seven indicators comprised 73% of the markers chosen and all seven were chosen by over three-quarters of the responders. Using a simple 'sign test' system, we then calculated a composite points score for all 302 PCOs. RESULTS: We found that there were almost twice as many PCOs at the upper and lower ends of performance and fewer in the middle than we predicted theoretically. The results suggest that pan-PCO or practice factors account for the low performance scores of 16 of 35 PCOs with extremely poor performance and for the high scores of 17 of the 36 PCOs with extremely high performance. CONCLUSION: We have developed a method that shows how numerous Department of Health performance indicators can be merged into a single composite performance score. We show that this composite performance score is easy to derive, simple to interpret, is acceptable to GPs, and has face validity.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Real time patient safety audits: improving safety every day.

BACKGROUND: Timely error detection including feedback to clinical staff is a prerequisite for focused improvement in patient safety. Real time auditing, the efficacy of which has been repeatedly demonstrated in industry, has not been used previously to evaluate patient safety. Methods successful at improving quality and safety in industry may provide avenues for improvement in patient safety. OBJECTIVE: Pilot study to determine the feasibility and utility of real time safety auditing during routine clinical work in an intensive care unit (ICU). METHODS: A 36 item patient safety checklist was developed via a modified Delphi technique. The checklist focused on errors associated with delays in care, equipment failure, diagnostic studies, information transfer and non-compliance with hospital policy. Safety audits were performed using the checklist during and after morning work rounds thrice weekly during the 5 week study period from January to March 2003. RESULTS: A total of 338 errors were detected; 27 (75%) of the 36 items on the checklist detected >or=1 error. Diverse error types were found including unlabeled medication at the bedside (n = 31), ID band missing or in an inappropriate location (n = 70), inappropriate pulse oximeter alarm setting (n = 22), and delay in communication/information transfer that led to a delay in appropriate care (n = 4). CONCLUSIONS: Real time safety audits performed during routine work can detect a broad range of errors. Significant safety problems were detected promptly, leading to rapid changes in policy and practice. Staff acceptance was facilitated by fostering a blame free "culture of patient safety" involving clinical personnel in detection of remediable gaps in performance, and limiting the burden of data collection.

Delphi Technique↗

Predicting parents' decisions on MMR immunisation: a mixed method investigation.

BACKGROUND: Increasing uptake rates for MMR vaccination requires an understanding of factors leading parents to decide for and against vaccination, particularly in the light of recent developments. OBJECTIVE: We investigated factors relevant to immunising and non-immunising parents and the extent to which these factors predicted their decisions. METHODS: The study was conducted in Edinburgh, UK. A two-stage mixed method design was used. Delphi technique elicited parents' views of factors relevant to MMR immunisation. Twenty-six factors identified as relevant were incorporated into a final questionnaire. Using cluster sampling, the final questionnaire was distributed to parents recruited through a group of local nurseries. 110 parents participated: eighty (72.7%) had had their child MMR vaccinated, thirty (27.3%) had refused the vaccine. The factors in the final questionnaire were analysed against vaccination status using a direct binary logistic regression model. RESULTS: Four factors significantly predicted vaccination status, (prediction toward 'yes vaccination'). These were the influence of current research (OR=0.18, 95% CI=0.07-0.51), the helpfulness of leaflets and information packs (OR=3.27, 95% CI=1.38-7.75), the importance of eradication of rubella (OR=2.42, 95% CI=1.01-5.78), and the importance attached to the risk of adverse reactions (OR=0.65, 95% CI=0.48-0.87). CONCLUSIONS: Differences between immunising and non-immunising parents lie in the importance attached to four relevant factors. Excluding risk of adverse reactions, these factors have not been previously identified as salient and require to be explored further. Health advice to parents should highlight the identified importance attached to eradicating rubella and explicitly reflect research findings.

Attitude↗

Reaching consensus on the National Dental Hygiene Research Agenda: a Delphi study. American Dental Hygienists Association Council on Research.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to achieve consensus on specific research topics under the national dental hygiene research agenda categories developed by the ADHA Council on Research. METHODS: A Delphi technique was used to survey a group of 48 dental hygiene experts to gain consensus about the appropriateness of topics for dental hygiene research. The study was carried out in three phases: a development and pilot-testing phase and two rounds of mailed surveys. Responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. Instrument reliability was analyzed using the Pearson Product-Moment Correlation Coefficient and Cronbach's Alpha for internal consistency. RESULTS: Sixty-six topics reflective of the research agenda categories were identified through the first phase. Return rates of 100% and 94% were achieved for the two survey rounds. Instrument reliability was established at .91 and internal consistency at .94. After two rounds, consensus was reached on 37 of the 66 topics. CONCLUSIONS: Each of the categories comprising the ADHA national dental hygiene research agenda was well represented by the 37 topics. This finding provided evidence that there was consensus on the national agenda. However, reaching consensus is just the first step in the development of a long-range plan to guide research efforts and to promote depth in the development of a body of knowledge based on scientific inquiry.

Delphi Technique↗

Critical care nursing research priorities in Hong Kong.

BACKGROUND: Research is vital to nursing practice especially in an area such as critical care, where nursing practice continues to increase in complexity and nurses assume greater responsibility and accountability for patient care. However, without knowledge of what are the most significant problems or questions affecting the welfare of critically ill patients in Hong Kong, nurses' research efforts may be directed to areas that are not of highest priority in today's climate of decreasing health care resources and changing health care provision. AIM: To identify and prioritize research questions of importance to Hong Kong critical care nurses. METHOD: A three-round Delphi technique was used to solicit, identify and prioritize problems for critical care nursing research. RESULTS: Respondents who completed the third round had a mean of 6.25 years of critical care nursing experience. Ninety-one research topics were ranked important or extremely important. Twenty-seven research priorities ranked as extremely important included topics relating to patient care, family care, nursing, technology, alternative interventions, and illness prevention/health promotion research domains. Thirteen research topics were ranked as least important. None of the participants ranked research topics as not important. STUDY LIMITATIONS: Only full-time active members of the Hong Kong Association of Critical Care Nurses participated in this study and they may not necessarily represent the views of all critical care nurses in Hong Kong. In addition, no attempts were made to compare research priorities between specialty groups of nurses. CONCLUSION: With the re-structuring of Hong Kong's health care system, critical care nurses are expected to take an active role in advancing the profession, and to be accountable for improving patient outcomes by use of effective, evidence-based interventions. The research priorities identified in this study may provide impetus and direction for critical care nursing research initiatives.

Adult↗