SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Directed Tissue Donation”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Are there morally problematic reasons for having children?
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The gift of a second chance.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Does bioethics provide answers?: Secular and religious bioethics and our procreative future.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Method, mediations, and the moral dimensions of preimplantation genetic diagnosis.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Claims to frozen embryos rejected.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
R (Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (Secretary of State for Health Intervening).
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
R (on the application of Quintavalle) v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Desperately seeking donors: the 'saviour sibling' decision in Quintavalle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (UK).
The recent House of Lords decision in Quintavalle v Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority has raised difficult and complex issues regarding the extent to which embryo selection and reproductive technology can be used as a means of rectifying genetic disorders and treating critically ill children. This comment outlines the facts of Quintavalle and explores how the House of Lords approached the legal, ethical and policy issues that arose out of the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority's (UK) decision to allow reproductive and embryo technology to be used to produce a 'saviour sibling' whose tissue could be used to save the life of a critically ill child. Particular attention will be given to the implications of the decision in Quintavalle for Australian family and medical law and policy. As part of this focus, the comment explores the current Australian legislative and policy framework regarding the use of genetic and reproductive technology as a mechanism through which to assist critically ill siblings. It is argued that the present Australian framework would appear to impose significant limits on the medical uses of genetic technology and, in this context, would seem to reflect many of the principles that were articulated by the House of Lords in Quintavalle.
Symbiotic relationships: saviour siblings, family rights and biomedicine.
It is now possible to combine the use of preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) and tissue matching to select an IVF embryo that will, after birth, be a compatible tissue donor for an existing individual. This article analyses the ethical issues and the regulatory frameworks that intersect around the creation of tissue compatible children.
African Americans and organ donors.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Conceiving a child to save a child: reproductive and filial ethics.
I conclude that Mary and Abe's decision to conceive a child to save a child does not impose harm on persons or on relationships in the family. Nor does it evince a lack of respect for the child they have conceived. The ethical guidelines that support this conclusion can now be summarized. First, actions should not depersonalize or otherwise endanger personal relationships. Second, although ideally personal relationships are initiated and continued for their own sake, after a personal relationship has been established and sustained the motives for establishing it recede in importance. Third, the requirement of honesty looms especially large in the context of personal relationships. Fourth, privacy protects personal relationships in the family from intrusion by the state. Fifth, even if those with whom we stand in personal relationships are not fully rational or self-conscious, we should treat them with respect. Finally, persons often are called upon to make greater sacrifices in personal relationships. These principles represent only the barest beginnings of an ethics for filial relationships. Nonetheless, they mark progress in the direction of developing a more complete account. We should not suppose that ethics in the family always will be spontaneous or "natural". Over a century ago, Mill warned that nature and natural are "one of the most copious sources of false taste, false philosophy, false morality, and even bad law". Especially in the wake of medical advances, such as recombinant DNA and new reproductive technologies, the complexity of filial ethics will only increase. The demographics of an aging society will add further complexity to filial contexts.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
The quality of life of donors, potential donors, and recipients of living-related donor renal transplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
A policy concerning the therapeutic use of human fetal tissue in transplantation.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The community blood supply and patients' choice. The community: still the best source of blood.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Kidney transplantation using living donors in Japan: how the donors feel.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Consent for children as organ donors.
The use of children as organ donors has been a source of legal and ethical concern since transplantation became generally available.