PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed1988

Closed unstable fractures of the tibia.

Unstable closed tibial fractures are those with major soft tissue damage, complete displacement, significant comminution, direct force mechanism, or articular surface involvement. Although the "average" tibial fracture is effectively managed without surgery, patients with such injuries frequently have prolonged convalescence and unsatisfactory anatomic and functional results. This review of recent literature reveals that in appropriately chosen patients, surgical fixation of unstable closed tibial fractures produces faster recovery and less residual disability or deformity. This is especially true when intramedullary nailing is indicated, as in transverse, short oblique, or segmental fractures. Plate and screw fixation is preferable for metaphyseal fractures. External fixation may be safest when soft tissue crushing is extensive, especially if fasciotomy is required.

Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary↗
PubMed1999

Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures.

In a prospective randomized study, we compared the new intramedullary implant of the gliding nail to the gamma nail in the fixation of 80 unstable trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. The preconditions of both groups were comparable. We found no differences concerning the operation time, blood loss, period of stationary treatment or social situation. Also, the anatomic reconstruction and the long-term function according to the Merle d'Aubigne score were comparable. Regarding postoperative complications, the gliding nail showed a minor tendency of cutting out; this we attribute to the special design of the dynamic blade and regard it as the most favourable advantage of this new implant.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

[Reconstruction of shoulder-girdle symmetry after midclavicular fractures. Stable, elastic intramedullary pinning versus rucksack bandage].

The aim of this study was to compare the results achieved in two groups of 20 patients treated for midclavicular fracture. The first group (mean age 36 years) was treated non-operatively with a rucksack bandage, whereas the second group (mean age 37 years) underwent intramedullary fixation with a titanium pin using a minimally invasive, unreamed technique. At follow-up, which averaged 3.1+/-0.9 years in group 1 and 2.9+/-0.7 years in group 2, the result of treatment, as indicated by the Constant score, functional outcome and cosmetic outcome, was significantly better in the group undergoing operative treatment. Clavicle shortening was significantly ( P=0.027) higher in patients treated with a rucksack bandage. The absolute Constant score averaged 78+/-23 in group 1 and 97+/-4 in group 2 ( P=0.001). The Constant rating scale showed a significant difference between patients with clavicle shortening of less than 1 cm and 1 cm shortening or more. There were two non-unions in group 1 but none in group 2. Refractures were not observed in either group. According to these results, intramedullary fixation with a titanium pin seems to be more advantageous in midclavicular fractures than non-operative treatment. As the operation is well received by the patients, it should be offered to them as an alternative treatment to the rucksack bandage.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1988

A technique for removing a fractured interlocking tibial nail.

The reported incidence of implant failure following reamed intramedullary tibial fixation is low. When necessary, retrieval of failed tibial nail segments is best performed in a closed fashion in order to avoid the delayed healing and increased risk of infection that may result from exposure of the tibial fracture site. A method to facilitate closed removal of the distal segment of a failed tibial nail is described.

Adult↗
PubMed1989

A comparison between delayed and immediate intramedullary nailing in the treatment of comminuted and open fractures (grade 1) of the tibia.

The authors studied a group of 215 comminuted or open (Grade 1) fractures of the tibial diaphysis in order to compare two methods successively adopted at the 1st Clinic and 3rd Division of the Rizzoli Orthopaedic Institute. We at first chose to delay nailing in these two types of fracture for 4 weeks (131 cases) and obtained good results in terms of consolidation, but only fair results in terms of functional recovery of ankle and subtalar movement and axial alignment of the tibia. Successively, we used immediate osteosynthesis with a screwed nail (84 cases), the results of which were better for all the parameters considered. The criteria for delaying intramedullary osteosynthesis in grade 1 open fractures are still valid, particularly when there are problems which necessarily delay operative treatment within 8 hours of injury. However, immediate treatment is essential in these fractures when they are associated with vascular lesions or in patients with multiple injuries. Finally, the authors express their preference for intramedullary nailing as compared with external fixation for the treatment of these open fractures with limited exposure.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

[Comparison between the results of intramedullary nailing and compression plate fixation in the treatment of humerus fractures].

OBJECTIVES: The results of open reduction and internal fixation of humeral shaft fractures by either an intramedullary nail or a dynamic compression plate were compared. METHODS: The study included 60 patients (43 males, 17 females; mean age 38 years; range 19 to 61 years) with humerus fractures. Thirty-three patients were treated with intramedullary nails and 27 patients with dynamic compression plates. Functional results were evaluated according to the Stewart and Hundley's criteria. The two methods were compared. The mean follow-up period was 42 months (range 28 to 72 months). RESULTS: Healing times did not differ between the two treatment groups (p>0.05). Radial nerve palsy occurred only in the dynamic compression plate group, with four patients being affected. On the other hand, the rate of non-union was significantly higher in patients treated with intramedullary nailing (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: No ideal fixation technique exists in the treatment of humerus fractures. Despite higher non-union rates, intramedullary nailing may be the method of choice in the treatment of humerus fractures because of such advantages as low morbidity, small dissection of soft tissues, and greater ease of application.

Adult↗
PubMed1998

Huckstep intramedullary nailing for non-union of humeral shaft fractures.

BACKGROUND: Various techniques of internal fixation for non-union of humeral shaft fractures have been attempted, leading to union rates of between 50 and 90% with persisting non-union causing pain and disability. Some of these techniques have led to shoulder and elbow dysfunction. METHODS: Eight patients treated with Huckstep nail fixation for humeral shaft non-union were reviewed and the rate of union was determined. Elbow and shoulder function were assessed as well as the presence of pain or disability. RESULTS: Union was achieved in seven of the eight patients (87.5%). Four patients had occasional mild pain after union. All patients achieved good arm function. Average shoulder abduction was 157 degrees and flexion 151 degrees excluding one patient with antecedent advanced osteoarthrosis of the gleno-humeral joint. No patient experienced any permanent neurological deficit. CONCLUSIONS: Huckstep nail fixation achieved union rates comparable to or higher than the other techniques of internal fixation for non-union of humeral shaft fractures. Unlike the various methods of closed nailing, Huckstep nail fixation is not associated with shoulder and elbow dysfunction. It should be considered as a therapeutic option in humeral shaft fracture and non-union, especially where the fracture site needs to be opened.

Aged↗