PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Immunization Schedule”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Pretesting Spanish-language educational radio messages to promote timely and complete infant immunization in California.

California's Hispanic infants have lower immunization levels than non-Latino white infants, 53.7% versus 65.2%, respectively. Spanish-language radio is an effective mass media venue for imparting information to Latino populations. It has been demonstrated that lack of parental knowledge of infant immunization timing is associated with delayed immunization coverage. In an effort to improve Latino parent knowledge of immunization timing, two Spanish-language radio commercials were developed to be used in conjunction with community-based educational efforts. In order to gage the potential educational impact of the two commercials, they were pretested with a group of low-income Spanish-speaking Latino parents who represented members of the target population for whom the commercials were created. Both commercials were rated favorably by parents, and elicited immunization-specific responses. Although correct recall of the simplified, basic immunization schedule was low, the level of immunization response consistency and overall approval of both commercials appear to support their use as part of Latino infant immunization educational outreach in California.

Adult↗

Universal childhood hepatitis B vaccination: infants vs. preadolescents, the Canadian perspective.

BACKGROUND: In the 1980s, populations of the United States and Canada exhibited similar and increasing incidence of hepatitis B. Vaccination programs targeted at high risk populations did not impact on overall disease incidence. METHODS: Hepatitis B immunization strategies in the United States and Canada were reviewed to determine their impact on vaccination coverage. To reduce the transmission of hepatitis B, divergent vaccination plans emerged within North America. The United States added hepatitis B to its universal infant immunization schedule, and Canada implemented hepatitis B immunization programs for preadolescents (9 through 13 years of age). RESULTS: To date, both strategies have markedly increased vaccination coverage among the targeted cohort. Hepatitis B vaccination coverage of infants rose from 8% in 1992 to 82% in 1996 in the United States. In Canada, hepatitis B vaccine uptake rates among preadolescents have been high, with all major provinces reporting near or greater than 90% coverage in 1996. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of acute and chronic hepatitis B in Canada should drop measurably within the decade as these protected preadolescents move into adulthood. In addition, the Canadian vaccine delivery infrastructure allows for the addition of new vaccines targeted for adolescents.

Adolescent↗

Diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis: guidelines for vaccine prophylaxis and other preventive measures. Recommendation of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee. Centers for Disease Control, Department of Health and Human Services.

This revision of the Immunization Practices Advisory Committee (ACIP) statement on diphtheria, tetanus, and pertussis updates the statement issued in 1981 and incorporates the 1984 supplementary statement on the risks of pertussis disease and pertussis vaccine for infants and children with personal histories of convulsions. It includes a review of the epidemiology of the three diseases, a description of the available immunobiologic preparations, and the appropriate immunization schedules. Also included are revisions in the schedule for combined diphtheria and tetanus toxoids, when pertussis vaccine is contraindicated, and revisions in the recommendations on precautions and contraindications to vaccine use, on immunization for infants and children who have underlying neurologic disorders, and on tetanus prophylaxis in wound management.

Adolescent↗

Prevention of poliomyelitis: recommendations for use of only inactivated poliovirus vaccine for routine immunization. Committee on Infectious Diseases. American Academy of Pediatrics.

Since 1997, when the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) initially recommended expanded use of inactivated poliovirus vaccine (IPV) for routine childhood immunization against poliovirus infection, the occurrence of vaccine-associated paralytic poliomyelitis (VAPP) has decreased in the United States. However, VAPP will not be eliminated until oral poliovirus vaccine (OPV) no longer is given. As a result of continuing progress toward global eradication of poliomyelitis, the risk of imported infection has continued to decrease. Concomitantly, the use of IPV has increased substantially with the corresponding decrease in the use of OPV, indicating widespread acceptance by health care professionals and parents of the sequential or all-IPV immunization schedule previously recommended by the AAP. In addition, availability of OPV will be substantially diminished beginning in early 2000. To eliminate VAPP in the context of decreasing risk of wild-type poliovirus importation, the AAP recommends an all-IPV schedule for routine childhood immunization beginning in early 2000. The AAP further recommends that, effective immediately, OPV no longer should be purchased for routine use. Guidelines are given for utilization of remaining supplies of OPV during the transition in early 2000 to the all-IPV schedule.

Child↗

[An observation of the immuno-persistence after inoculating with the domestic BRD II strain rubella vaccine among infants and young children].

OBJECTIVE: To study the immuno-persistence after inoculating with the domestic BRD II strain rubella vaccine among infants and young children. METHODS: Hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody detection method was used to test on children at age 6 to 18 months without rubella infection or rubella vaccine immunization in Yantai city of Shandong province and were selected for the observation of the immuno-persistence against the domestic BRD II strain rubella vaccine from 1995 to 1998. RESULTS: Positive rates of HI antibody among children of 6, 7, 8, 9, 12 and 18 month-old of inoculation were 94.44%, 97.22%, 96.67%, 100.00%, 100.00%, 100.00% and 93.10%, 93.55%, 96.77%, 96.97%, 100.00%, 100.00% (P > 0.05), in one or two years respectively. The geometric mean reverse titers (GMRTs) were about 50% lower than that after 1 month after 1 year. Similar results were found that after 2 years GMRTs was about 50% lower than that after 1 year of inoculation. There was highly significant difference on GMRTs of HI antibody between infants with 6 to 7 month-olds (29.89) and young children with 8 to 18 month-olds (53.00) after 2 years of inoculation (t = 3.58, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The immunization schedule at the first dose for BRD II strain rubella vaccine should be started when the child is 8 month old. For the second dose, the immunization schedule used in other developed countries should be referred adopted in China.

Antibodies, Viral↗

Long term serologic follow-up after pertussis immunization.

Neutralizing antibodies to pertussis toxin (antitoxin) were determined in 201 blood samples from 4-year-old children. They had received primary immunization at 6 to 8 months of age with an acellular (n = 149) or a whole cell (n = 52) pertussis vaccine and 195 of them had received a booster dose of the acellular vaccine 9 to 16 months later. Data on exposure to pertussis and occurrence of pertussis were also collected. There was a rapid decrease of antitoxin between immediate postbooster titers and those measured 24 months later. This decrease per month was significantly greater than that after the primary immunization series (P less than 0.001). Neither the number nor the spacing of acellular vaccine doses given for primary series influenced the titers found 24 months after the booster. An antitoxin response was still measurable in 86% of the 196 four-year-old children. None of 19 exposed children developed whooping cough, which suggested that the antibody concentrations during the follow-up period were sufficient for protection. The results indicate a need for long term follow-up studies in the evaluation of new vaccines and immunization schedules.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone fusion protein vaccines block estrous cycle activity in beef heifers.

Two LHRH fusion proteins, thioredoxin and ovalbumin, each containing seven LHRH inserts were tested for their ability to inhibit estrous cycle activity. The objective was to evaluate immune and biological responses from alternating the two fusion proteins in an immunization schedule. One hundred ten heifers were divided equally into 11 groups. Two control groups consisted of either spayed or intact, untreated heifers. Heifers in the other nine groups were immunized on wk 0, 4, and 9. Treatments were immunizations of the same protein throughout or alternating the proteins in different booster sequences. Blood was collected weekly for 22 wk, and serum was assayed for concentrations of progesterone and titers of anti-LHRH. At slaughter, reproductive tracts were removed from each heifer and weighed. Heifers with >or=1 ng/mL of progesterone were considered to have a functional corpus luteum and thus to have estrous cycle activity. All LHRH-immunized groups of heifers had a smaller (P < 0.05) proportion of heifers showing estrous cycle activity after 6 wk than the intact, untreated control group. There was no difference in number of heifers cycling between the immunized groups and the spayed heifers during wk 9 to 22. Anti-LHRH did not differ among immunized groups during wk 1 to 9. Starting at wk 10 and continuing through the conclusion of the study, there was an overall difference among treatment groups for anti-LHRH (P < 0.05). Uterine weights differed among treatments (P < 0.05), with intact control animals having heavier uteri than all other groups (P < 0.05). Uterine weights were negatively correlated with maximum LHRH antibody binding (r = -0.44). In summary, the LHRH fusion proteins were as effective as surgical spaying in suppression of estrous cycle activity, but alternating the two proteins in an immunization schedule did not enhance the immunological or biological effectiveness of the vaccine.

Animals↗

Rationale for use of Tdap booster vaccines for adolescent immunization: overview of efficacy, safety, and clinical use.

Pertussis is one of the only vaccine-preventable diseases with increasing incidence in the United States. The incidence of pertussis infection in adolescents is a growing concern; it can be a severe disease that may lead to significant morbidity and mortality when transmitted to susceptible populations (eg, infants). Experts have conceded that booster vaccination of adolescents may considerably decrease the incidence of pertussis infections in previously immunized, partially immunized, and nonimmunized populations. Studies in 2 tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis (Tdap) booster vaccines licensed by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have shown efficacy against pertussis disease and have demonstrated a safety profile comparable to tetanus and diphtheria vaccine (Td) in adolescents. Immunization schedules now include use of Tdap vaccines for preadolescent and adolescent populations to counter the increase in pertussis outbreaks. Challenges for clinicians include prompt recognition of pertussis symptoms, proper diagnosis using appropriate tools, and timely reporting of pertussis infections to surveillance bodies. Additional studies are needed to monitor trends of pertussis incidence after implementing the new vaccination schedule for adolescents.

Adolescent↗

TBE booster immunization in adults--first experience with a new tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) vaccine, free of protein-derived stabilizer.

A total of 222 adult subjects, all of whom received primary immunization according to the rapid immunization schedule in a preceding clinical trial with either a new (i.e. polygeline free) or formerly licensed (i.e. polygeline containing) TBE vaccine were invited for extension studies. The subjects received the first booster immunization with the new TBE vaccine at 12 to 18 months after primary immunization. Subsequently, a total of 191 of the 222 subjects could be enrolled in a serological follow-up one year after the booster immunization. Neutralizing TBE antibody titers were determined prior to, 21 days after and approximately 12 months after booster immunization. Prior to first booster immunization, TBE antibodies (GMTs) had remained on a high level and were far above the detection limit of the neutralization test used. All subjects of the per protocol population who were primarily immunized with the new TBE vaccine formulation and all but one subject of the control group were still seropositive prior to the booster. All subjects showed a sharp increase of TBE antibodies following the booster immunization. Within the 12 months follow-up period, neutralizing TBE antibody titers remained on a high level. The booster vaccination was well tolerated by the subjects. Only very few febrile reactions (< 1%) none higher than 38.5 degrees C were reported. No serious or unexpected adverse events related to vaccination were reported. These successful results in terms of both immunogenicity and safety indicate that TBE vaccination with this new TBE vaccine can be used safely in adults. A long lasting immunity can be concluded from the strong immune response following the booster immunization.

Adult↗

Are tick-borne encephalitis vaccines interchangeable?

Two tick-borne encephalitis vaccines produced by two vaccine manufacturers are available in most European countries. A question that is frequently asked regarding these two vaccines concerns their exchangeability, however, to date, no detailed assessment has been published. This review analyzes clinical studies investigating these two vaccines and describes possible approaches to boost or continue uncompleted primary immunization schedules, with either of the two tick-borne encephalitis vaccines.

Encephalitis Viruses↗

Immunogenicity and safety of a combination pneumococcal-meningococcal vaccine in infants: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: The success of conjugate vaccines in decreasing invasive disease due to Streptococcus pneumoniae and group C Neisseria meningitidis has placed pressure on crowded infant immunization schedules, making development of combination vaccines a priority. OBJECTIVE: To determine the safety and immunogenicity of a combination 9-valent pneumococcal-group C meningococcal conjugate candidate vaccine (Pnc9-MenC) administered as part of the routine UK infant immunization schedule at ages 2, 3, and 4 months. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Phase 2 randomized controlled trial conducted from August 2000 to January 2002 and enrolling 240 healthy infants aged 7 to 11 weeks from 2 UK centers, with home follow-up visits at ages 2, 3, 4, and 5 months. INTERVENTION: Pnc9-MenC (n = 120) or monovalent group C meningococcal conjugate vaccine (MenC) (n = 120) administered in addition to routine immunizations (diphtheria and tetanus toxoids and whole-cell pertussis [DTwP], Haemophilus influenzae type b [Hib] polyribosylribitol phosphate-tetanus toxoid protein conjugate, oral polio vaccine). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Group C meningococcal immunogenicity measured by serum bactericidal titer (SBT) 1 month following the third dose; rates of postimmunization reactions. RESULTS: MenC component immunogenicity was reduced in the Pnc9-MenC vs the MenC group (geometric mean SBT, 179 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 133-243] vs 808 [95% CI, 630-1037], respectively; P<.001). The proportion with group C meningococcal SBT greater than 1:8 was lower in the Pnc9-MenC vs the MenC group (95% vs 100%, P = .05). The geometric mean concentration of antibodies to concomitantly administered Hib vaccine was reduced in the Pnc9-MenC vs the MenC group (2.11 [95% CI, 1.57-2.84] microg/mL vs 3.36 [95% CI, 2.57-4.39] microg/mL; P = .02), as were antibodies against diphtheria (0.74 [95% CI, 0.63-0.87] microg/mL vs 1.47 [95% CI, 1.28-1.69] microg/mL; P<.001). Pnc9-MenC was immunogenic for each of 9 contained pneumococcal serotypes, with responses greater than 0.35 microg/mL observed in more than 88% of infants. Increased irritability and decreased activity were observed after the third dose in the Pnc9-MenC group. CONCLUSIONS: Pnc9-MenC combination vaccine administered to infants at ages 2, 3, and 4 months demonstrated reduced group C meningococcal immunogenicity compared with MenC vaccine. The immunogenicity of concomitantly administered Hib and DTwP vaccines was also diminished. The Pnc9-MenC vaccine was safe and immunogenic for all contained pneumococcal serotypes. The reduced MenC immunogenicity may limit the development of the Pnc9-MenC vaccine.

Antibodies, Bacterial↗

Humoral immune response to the anti-malaria vaccine SPf66 in the Colombian Atrato River region.

The immunogenicity of anti-malaria synthetic vaccine SPf66 was tested in a region of the Colombian middle Atrato river. The specific serum antibodies against SPf66 were quantified in vaccinees and placebo injected controls for a two-years period post-immunization. The frequency of individuals showing seroconversion of anti-SPf66 antibodies three months after completion of the immunization schedule was higher in vaccinees than in controls (52.7% and 25.5%, respectively, p < 0.01). However, an over than four-fold increase of the specific anti-SPf66 antibody titers was observed only in 1.4% of vaccinees and 0.2% of the controls (p < 0.01). The anti-SPf66 antibody titers augmented in vaccinees from first dose application to three months after the third dose, continuously decreasing thereafter to reach below baseline values two years after completion of the immunization schedule. The results show that SPf66 has very low immunogenicity and induces a short term humoral immune response (six months).

Adolescent↗

The National Immunization Information Hotline.

The National Immunization Information Hotline (NIIH) has been providing information regarding immunizations to the public and to health care professionals since March 1997. We describe the operations of the NIIH, its experience over the first two and a half years of operation and lessons learned for other immunization hotlines. From 1998-2000, the hotline answered 246,859 calls. Calls concerning immunization information requests totaled 175,367; data about the calls were collected from 35,102. Approximately a third of the 35,102 calls were from health care providers. Of the remaining calls from the public, the greatest number of calls concerned childhood immunizations. Immunization schedule queries from the public increased 323.0% from 1998 to 2000. While the major goal of the NIIH is to provide accurate and reliable information to the public and to health care providers, data from the hotline can be used to monitor changes over time in calls concerning inquiries about the immunization schedule in addition to other variables of interest.

Adolescent↗

Combination vaccines: practical considerations for public health and private practice.

BACKGROUND: Although the current immunization schedule for children requires as many as four or five injections at a single visit, both parents and health care providers hesitate to administer more than two or three simultaneous injections. Therefore new combination vaccines that include multiple unrelated antigens are needed. METHODS: Individuals from the Immunization Division of the Colorado State Department of Health and pediatricians in private practice in Denver, CO, were interviewed and asked about incorporating new combination vaccines into their practice. RESULTS: At a state health department level the transition to combination vaccines will likely require reprioritizing of public health resources. In addition state health officials are important information resources for public and private providers, as well as for the community. At the level of the private provider combination vaccines hold promise for simplifying the immunization schedule, but successful implementation will require education and guidance on how best to integrate the new combination into practice. CONCLUSIONS: Combination vaccines are the immediate solution to the addition of new childhood vaccines and will alleviate the concern of parents and physicians regarding the trauma related to multiple injections at a single visit.

Colorado↗

Immunization determinants in the eastern region of Ghana.

A study of the immunization determinants of children aged 12 to 18 months was conducted in 1991 in the Eastern Region of Ghana, using structured interviews of mothers and fathers. The completion of immunization schedules by one year, among the 294 children, was positively associated (P < 0.005) with the town of residence of the child and mother, the ability of the mother to speak English, the target child having been treated for illness at the local hospital, the child's mother having given birth to less than 5 children, the possession of a sewing machine by the mother, and the birth of the child in the current town of residence. Significantly higher immunization coverage levels were achieved where the Under Fives' Clinic was an affordable and acceptable service, integrating preventive and curative care, and where measures were implemented by the community to increase attendance levels at the Clinic. This was achieved among a target group who were otherwise at a relatively high risk of failing to complete immunization schedules on-time.

Fathers↗

Safety and immunogenicity of a conjugate vaccine against Haemophilus influenzae type b in splenectomized and nonsplenectomized patients with Cooley anemia.

Patients with thalassemia are at increased risk for infections, especially after undergoing splenectomy. Vaccinations and antimicrobial prophylaxis are recommended in these patients, but the optimal immunization schedule for Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine is unknown. The immunogenicity of a conjugate Hib vaccine was investigated in 57 patients with thalassemia, 32 of whom had undergone splenectomy. Anti-capsular antibodies to Hib (anti-polyribosylribitol phosphate) were measured before vaccination and 2, 6, 12, 24, and 36 months after vaccination. Immunization was well tolerated. All patients achieved protective (>1 microg/mL) antibody levels. Antibody titers declined after the initial postvaccination increase, becoming undetectable in 4 patients and decreasing to concentrations of 0.15-1 microg/mL in another 2 patients when tested 2-3 years after vaccination. Hib conjugate vaccine is safe and immunogenic in patients with thalassemia major; however, additional studies are needed to assess the need and timing of booster vaccination to maintain long-term immunity.

Adolescent↗

Clinical management of immigrants' immunization histories: a focus on Soviet health records and BCG.

Increasing numbers of immigrants from the former Soviet Union are settling in the United States each year, making it imperative for clinicians to know how to find and interpret immigrant children's immunization records. Records show that these children have usually received immunizations against tetanus, diphtheria, pertussis, poliomyelitis, measles, mumps and tuberculosis (BCG). They are occasionally vaccinated against influenza, smallpox and tularemia, but never against rubella, hepatitis B or H. influenzae meningitis. The Soviet immunization schedule differs significantly from the U.S. schedule only in BCG vaccine and polio immunization. Contrary to widespread belief in the United States, BCG vaccination does not necessarily render a child's tuberculin skin test positive, and it certainly does not confer total immunity to tuberculosis. MMR vaccination is essential for all Soviet immigrant children. A single update of all the other immunizations may be a wise approach when handling Soviet children's immunizations.

BCG Vaccine↗

Are you up to date with new immunization recommendations?

Vaccines are one of the most important and effective tools for protecting the health of the public and family physicians are instrumental in insuring that vaccine recommendations are implemented. With the development of new vaccines come increasingly complex recommendations. Staying current is challenging. This column describes the most recent changes to the immunization schedules made by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Adolescent↗