Getting integrins into shape: recent insights into how integrin activity is regulated by conformational changes.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Antibody inhibition and alpha6beta1 ligand binding experiments indicate that the egg integrin alpha6beta1 functions as a receptor for sperm during gamete fusion; yet, eggs null for the alpha6 integrin exhibit normal fertilization. Alternative integrins may be involved in sperm-egg binding and fusion and could compensate for the absence of alpha6beta1. Various beta1 integrins and alphav integrins are present on mouse eggs. Some of these integrins are also reported to be receptors for ADAMs, which are expressed on sperm. Using alpha3 integrin null eggs, we found that the alpha3beta1 integrin was not essential for sperm-egg binding and fusion. Oocyte-specific, beta1 integrin conditional knockout mice allowed us to obtain mature eggs lacking all beta1 integrins. We found that the beta1 integrin null eggs were fully functional in fertilization both in vivo and in vitro. Furthermore, neither anti-mouse beta3 integrin function-blocking monoclonal antibody (mAb) nor alphav integrin function-blocking mAb inhibited sperm binding to or fusion with beta1 integrin null eggs. Thus, function of beta3 or alphav integrins does not seem to be involved in compensating for the absence of beta1 integrins. These results indicate that none of the integrins known to be present on mouse eggs or to be ADAM receptors are essential for sperm-egg binding/fusion, and thus, egg integrins may not play the role in gamete fusion previously attributed to them.
Motile chick skeletal fibroblasts adhere to a laminin substrate by means of clustered beta 1 integrins. These integrin "macroaggregates" are similar to classic focal contacts but do not appear dark under interference-reflection microscopy. They contain alpha 5 integrin and are associated with extracellular fibronectin. To study their behavior during cell movement, time-lapse, low-light video microscopy was used to image integrins on living cells tagged with a fluorescent anti-beta 1 integrin antibody. Integrin macroaggregates remain fixed with respect to the substratum, despite the fact that they fluctuate in size, density, and shape over a period of minutes. Upon detachment of the cell rear, as much as 85% of the beta 1 integrin density of a macroaggregate remains behind on the substrate, along with both alpha 5 integrin and fibronectin. Release of the cell rear does not involve cleavage of the beta 1 integrin cytoplasmic domain from the remainder of the protein. These results indicate that cell motility does not require regulated detachment of integrin receptors from the substrate. On the other hand, cytoskeletal components and a variable fraction of the integrins are carried forward with the cell during detachment, suggesting that some type of cortical disassembly process does occur. Integrin macroaggregate structures are not recycled intact after detachment of the cell rear from the substrate. They do not persist on the cell surface, nor can they be seen to be engulfed by vesicles; yet, some of the individual integrins that make up these macroaggregates are eventually transported forward by both vesicular and cell-surface routes. Antibody-tagged integrins accumulate in dense patches at the lateral edges and dorsal surface of the cell, and move forward on the cell surface. The tagged integrins also enter cytoplasmic vesicles, which move forward within the cytoplasm. Macroaggregates generally form and grow at the cell front; however, application of fluorescent antibody causes integrins to disappear from the leading edge. Therefore, it has not been possible to directly visualize the recycling of the forward moving tagged integrins into new macroaggregates at the cell front. Surprisingly, under these conditions cells move normally despite the absence of any delivery of tagged integrin to the leading edge, indicating that recycling of integrins to the lamella is not required for apparently normal motility.
Most viral vectors used for gene therapy lack the ability to target a defined cell population. Parvovirus B19 has a restricted tropism for human erythroid progenitor cells and uses activated alpha5beta1 integrins as coreceptors for entry [Weigel-Kelley, K.A., Yoder, M.C., and Srivastava, A. (2003). Blood 102, 3927-3933]. In this study we examined the role of coexpressed integrins in alpha5beta1 integrin coreceptor function. Antibody-mediated cross-linking of beta1, beta2, and beta3 integrins and the integrin-associated protein (IAP) increased parvovirus B19 entry into nontarget K562 cells. Functional silencing of one integrin group, however, reduced the virus uptake- promoting function of a subsequently activated integrin group, indicating that the three integrins did not operate in isolation but through shared signaling pathways. This was further corroborated by direct competition between simultaneously clustered beta2 and beta1 integrins that could be overcome by stabilizing clustered beta1 integrins in a high-affinity conformation. In contrast, parvovirus B19 entry into primary erythroid progenitor cells was characterized by strong clustering-induced beta1 integrin coreceptor activity that was not abolished by subsequent beta2 and beta3 integrin activation and was, in fact, substantially increased in the presence of preclustered beta2 and beta3 integrins. Thus, integrin function is regulated in a cell type-specific manner through coexpressed integrins and preferential parvovirus B19 entry into erythroid progenitor cells is promoted by a robust beta1 integrin response that is enhanced through stable preclustering of coexpressed integrins. These results have implications for other viral vectors that use integrins as receptors/coreceptors and for gene therapy of hematopoietic progenitor cells using parvovirus B19 vectors.
We have examined the ability of transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF-beta 1) and platelet-derived growth factor-BB (PDGF-BB) to regulate the expression of various integrins in cultured rabbit vascular smooth muscle cells (SMC). We found that expression of the alpha v beta 3 integrin complex was induced by both growth factors, although TGF-beta 1 appeared to be the more potent inducer. mRNA level of the beta 3 integrin subunit was undetectable in quiescent cells and enhanced by both growth factors, while the alpha v integrin subunit mRNA level did not change with growth factor addition. Therefore, appearance of the alpha v beta 3 integrin protein complex after growth factor stimulation was due to increased expression of the beta 3 integrin subunit mRNA. The TGF-beta 1 induced increase in beta 3 integrin mRNA was delayed, but did not require prior protein synthesis, since cycloheximide was unable to block the increase in beta 3 mRNA level. By contrast, PDGF-BB induced a more rapid increase in beta 3 integrin mRNA level that peaked by 6 h after growth factor addition and no detectable beta 3 integrin mRNA remained after 24 h. Interestingly, the PDGF-BB induced elevation of beta 3 integrin, although more rapid, was completely inhibited by cycloheximide. Expression of the alpha 5 integrin subunit in response to growth factors was very similar to beta 3. However, in contrast to beta 3 and alpha 5, neither TGF-beta 1 nor PDGF-BB were able to alter the expression of the beta 1 integrin subunit in vascular SMC. However, in TGF-beta 1 treated cells, there was a large increase in expression of a 190 kDa polypeptide that was associated with the beta 1 integrin subunit. This 190 kDa polypeptide was not detected in PDGF treated SMC or in TGF-beta 1 treated fibroblasts. The alpha 1 integrin subunit has a MW of approximately 190 kDa and is capable of complexing with beta 1. Analysis of the alpha 1 integrin subunit mRNA level indicated that it was indeed induced by TGF-beta 1, but not by PDGF-BB, suggesting that the 190 kDa polypeptide may be the alpha 1 integrin subunit. These results indicate that TGF-beta 1 and PDGF-BB are potent but distinct activators of integrin expression in vascular SMC.
Tetraspanin CD82 has been implicated in integrin-mediated functions such as cell motility and invasiveness. Although tetraspanins associate with integrins, it is unknown if and how CD82 regulates the functionality of integrins. In this study, we found that Du145 prostate cancer cells underwent morphogenesis on the reconstituted basement membrane Matrigel to form an anastomosing network of multicellular structures. This process entirely depends on integrin alpha6, a receptor for laminin. After CD82 is expressed in Du145 cells, this cellular morphogenesis was abolished, indicating a functional cross-talk between CD82 and alpha6 integrins. Interestingly, antibodies against other tetraspanins expressed in Du145 cells such as CD9, CD81, and CD151 did not block this integrin alpha6-dependent morphogenesis. We further found that CD82 significantly inhibited cell adhesion on laminin 1. Notably, the level of alpha6 integrins on the cell surface was down-regulated upon CD82 expression, although total cellular alpha6 protein levels remained unchanged in CD82-expressing cells. This down-regulation indicates that the diminished cell adhesiveness of CD82-expressing Du145 cells on laminin likely resulted from less cell surface expression of alpha6 integrins. As expected, CD82 physically associated with the integrin alpha6 in Du145-CD82 transfectant cells, suggesting that the formation of the CD82-integrin alpha6 complex reduces alpha6 integrin cell surface expression. Finally, the internalization of cell surface integrin alpha6 is significantly enhanced upon CD82 expression. In conclusion, our results indicate that 1) CD82 attenuates integrin alpha6 signaling during a cellular morphogenic process; 2) the decreased surface expression of alpha6 integrins in CD82-expressing cells is likely responsible for the diminished adhesiveness on laminin and, subsequently, results in the attenuation of alpha6 integrin-mediated cellular morphogenesis; and 3) the accelerated internalization of integrin alpha6 upon CD82 expression correlates with the down-regulation of cell surface integrin alpha6.
Human parechovirus 1 (HPEV1) displays an arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD) motif in the VP1 capsid protein, suggesting integrins as candidate receptors for HPEV1. A panel of monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) specific for integrins alphavbeta3, alphavbeta1, and alphavbeta5, which have the ability to recognize the RGD motif, and also a MAb specific for integrin alpha2beta1, an integrin that does not recognize the RGD motif, were tested on A549 cells. Our results showed that integrin alphav-specific MAb reduced infectivity by 85%. To specify which alphav integrins the virus utilizes, we tested MAbs specific to integrins alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta1 which reduced infectivity significantly, while a MAb specific for integrin alphavbeta5, as well as the MAb specific for alpha2beta1, showed no reduction. When a combination of MAbs specific for integrins alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta1 were used, virus infectivity was almost completely inhibited; this shows that integrins alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta1 are utilized by the virus. We therefore proceeded to test whether alphav integrins' natural ligands fibronectin and vitronectin had an effect on HPEV1 infectivity. We found that vitronectin reduced significantly HPEV1 infectivity, whereas a combination of vitronectin and fibronectin abolished infection. To verify the use of integrins alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta1 as HPEV1 receptors, CHO cells transfected and expressing either integrin alphavbeta3 or integrin alphavbeta1 were used. It was shown that the virus could successfully infect these cells. However, in immunoprecipitation experiments using HPEV1 virions and allowing the virus to bind to solubilized A549 cell extract, we isolated and confirmed by Western blotting the alphavbeta3 heterodimer. In conclusion, we found that HPEV1 utilises both integrin alphavbeta3 and alphavbeta1 as receptors; however, in cells that express both integrins, HPEV1 may preferentially bind integrin alphavbeta3.
Tight, dynamic control of the affinity of integrin adhesion receptors for their extracellular ligands (integrin activation) is essential for the development and functioning of multicellular organisms. Integrin activation is controlled by intracellular signals that, through their action on integrin cytoplasmic domains, induce conformational changes in integrin extracellular domains, resulting in increased affinity for the ligand. Recent results indicate that the binding of talin, a major actin-binding protein, to integrin beta tails represents a final common step in integrin activation pathways. The major integrin-binding site lies within the talin FERM (four-point-one, ezrin, radixin, moesin) domain, and binding occurs via a variant of the classical PTB domain (phosphotyrosine-binding domain)-NPxY interaction. Formation of this talin-integrin complex plays a critical role in integrin activation, since mutations, in either talin or integrin beta tails, which disrupt complex formation, inhibit integrin activation. Furthermore, use of RNA interference to knockdown talin expression selectively reveals that talin is essential for integrin activation in response to physiological agonists. Thus the association of the cytoskeletal protein talin with integrin beta cytoplasmic domains is a critical step during integrin activation, and regulation of this step may be a final common element in the signalling pathways that control integrin activation.
We have recombinantly expressed a soluble form of human alpha(2)beta(1) integrin that lacks the membrane-anchoring transmembrane domains as well as the cytoplasmic tails of both integrin subunits. This soluble alpha(2)beta(1) integrin binds to its collagen ligands the same way as the wild-type alpha(2)beta(1) integrin. Furthermore, like the wild-type form, it can be activated by manganese ions and an integrin-activating antibody. However, it does not bind to rhodocytin, a postulated agonist of alpha(2)beta(1) integrin from the snake venom of Calloselasma rhodostoma, which elicits platelet aggregation. Taking advantage of the recombinantly expressed, soluble alpha(2)beta(1) integrin, an inhibition assay was established in which samples can be tested for their capability to inhibit binding of soluble alpha(2)beta(1) integrin to immobilized collagen. Thus, by scrutinizing the C. rhodostoma snake venom in this protein-protein interaction assay, we found a component of the snake venom that inhibits the interaction of soluble alpha(2)beta(1) integrin to type I collagen efficiently. N-terminal sequences identified this inhibitor as rhodocetin, a recently published antagonist of collagen-induced platelet aggregation. We could demonstrate that its inhibitory effect bases on its strong and specific binding to alpha(2)beta(1) integrin, proving that rhodocetin is a disintegrin. Standing apart from the growing group of RGD-dependent snake venom disintegrins, rhodocetin interacts with alpha(2)beta(1) integrin in an RGD-independent manner. Furthermore, its native conformation, which is stabilized by disulfide bridges, is indispensibly required for its inhibitory activity. Rhodocetin does not contain any major collagenous structure despite its high affinity to alpha(2)beta(1) integrin, which binds to collagenous molecules much more avidly than to noncollagenous ligands, such as laminin. Blocking alpha(2)beta(1) integrin as the major collagen receptor on platelets, rhodocetin is responsible for hampering collagen-induced, alpha(2)beta(1) integrin-mediated platelet activation, leading to hemorrhages and bleeding disorders of the snakebite victim. Moreover, having a widespread tissue distribution, alpha(2)beta(1) integrin also mediates cell adhesion, spreading, and migration. We showed that rhodocetin is able to inhibit alpha(2)beta(1) integrin-mediated adhesion of fibrosarcoma cells to type I collagen completely.
Occupancy of integrin adhesion receptors can alter the functions of other integrins and cause partition of the ligand-occupied integrin into focal adhesions. Ligand binding also changes the conformation of integrin extracellular domains. To explore the relationship between ligand-induced conformational change and integrin signaling, we examined the effect of ligands specific for integrin alpha IIb beta 3 on the functions of target integrins alpha 5 beta 1 and alpha 2 beta 1. We report that binding of integrin-specific ligands to a suppressive integrin can inhibit the function of other target integrins (trans-dominant inhibition). Trans-dominant inhibition is due to a blockade of integrin signaling. Furthermore, this inhibition involves both a conformational change in the extracellular domain and the presence of the beta cytoplasmic tail in the suppressive integrin. Similarly, ligand-induced recruitment of alpha IIb beta 3 to focal adhesions also involves a conformational rearrangement of its extracellular domain. These findings imply that the ligand-induced conformational changes can propagate from an integrin's extracellular to its intracellular face. Trans-dominant inhibition by integrin ligands may coordinate integrin signaling and can lead to unexpected biological effects of integrin-specific inhibitors.
PURPOSE: During the increased eye growth that results in myopia, the sclera undergoes biochemical and biomechanical remodeling. The cell surface integrin receptor family has important roles during tissue remodeling, regulating the extracellular matrix environment and cellular biomechanical properties. As integrin receptors may have a role in remodeling during myopia, this study detailed subunit gene expression in the mammalian sclera. METHODS: Several tissues, including sclera, were isolated from the tree shrew, a mammalian model used in eye growth studies. Total RNA was purified, reverse transcribed and primers for the alpha- and beta-integrin subunits were designed to the published human sequence in areas of high inter-species homology. PCR was used to amplify products of predetermined size and all tree shrew integrin subunits were sequenced to confirm their identity. Multiple PCR conditions were used to identify the scleral integrin subunits, and positive control tissues were included to reduce the possibility of false negative results. RESULTS: Integrin PCR products corresponding to the beta1-, beta4-, beta5-, and beta8-integrin subunits and the alpha-integrin subunits, alpha1-6-, alpha9-11- and alphav-integrin were identified in the sclera and in scleral fibroblast cultures. The respective sequences showed a high identity (>81%) to their human counterparts. The beta2-, beta3-, beta6-, beta7-, alpha7-, and alpha8-integrin subunits were not detected in tree shrew scleral samples, despite being present in the respective positive controls. Association of the 4 beta-integrin subunits with the 10 alpha-integrin subunits suggests that the mammalian sclera is capable of expressing 13 of the 24 identified integrin receptors. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first systematic description of the integrin subunit expression profile in the sclera. Due to the multiple roles of integrin receptors during tissue remodeling, the identification of these scleral integrins is an important preliminary step in determining the role of these receptors during normal eye growth and myopia development.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze integrin expression and distribution in different histological types of ameloblastoma, compared with dental germ, dental lamina and adult lining epithelium. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-micrometer sections from paraffin-embedded specimens were evaluated employing a streptavidin-biotin immunohistochemical method and anti-integrin alpha2, alpha3, alpha5, alphav, beta1, beta3 and beta4 antibodies. RESULTS: All integrins were present in all specimens, exhibiting different patterns. In follicular ameloblastoma, the integrin staining was stronger in the periphery while integrin alpha2 was not present in the central cells. Acanthomatous ameloblastoma showed a similar pattern, with positive staining for integrins alpha3, alpha5, alphav, beta1 and beta4 in the metaplastic cells. In the unicystic, integrin staining was uniform except for integrins alpha5 and beta3 which showed weaker staining in the upper layers. In the plexiform ameloblastoma, dental germ and lamina integrin staining was uniform. In the adult lining epithelium, staining for integrins alpha2, alpha5 and beta4 was confined to the basal layer, while integrins alphav and beta3 were present in the basal and parabasal, with integrins alpha3 and beta1 in the upper layers. CONCLUSION: Acanthomatous, follicular and unicystic ameloblastomas showed integrin staining patterns similar to the adult lining epithelium while the plexiform ameloblastoma was similar to the dental germ and lamina.
In vivo studies show that beta3-integrin-mediated focal adhesion formation (FAF) causes recruitment of nonreceptor tyrosine kinases to the cytoskeleton in pressure-overloaded myocardium. To define the mechanism of beta3-integrin-mediated signaling, we developed a cell culture model (adult feline cardiocytes embedded in a 3-dimensional matrix of native type 1 collagen, fibronectin, and vitronectin) wherein beta3-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase occurs. Focal adhesion kinase was analyzed immunocytochemically using confocal microscopy. Initial studies suggested that cardiocytes cultured in a 3-dimensional matrix formed focal adhesions consisting of both beta3-integrin and the muscle-specific isoform, beta1-integrin (beta1D). The focal adhesions were associated with focal adhesion kinase on both costameres and intercalated disks. To determine the cause of beta1D-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase in this model, time course studies were done. Beta3-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase occurred within 30 minutes after embedding cardiocytes and persisted for >24 hours, whereas beta1D-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase was present from the outset. Because confocal microscopy showed that laminin was present on the surface of freshly isolated cardiocytes, we hypothesized that this was causative of beta1D-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase. Freshly isolated cardiocytes washed with acidic medium (2 minutes, pH 3.0) to remove laminin and then embedded in a 3-dimensional matrix showed complete absence of beta1D-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase, but beta3-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase occurred with a time course similar to that seen in cultured, unwashed cardiocytes. Acid washing did not alter the binding ability of beta1D-integrin, because acid-washed cardiocytes in the presence of laminin showed beta1D-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase. Thus, cardiocytes embedded in a 3-dimensional matrix show beta3-integrin-mediated focal adhesion kinase and provide an in vitro model to study beta3-integrin-mediated signaling in response to hemodynamic cardiac loading.
ADAM disintegrin domains can support integrin-mediated cell adhesion. However, the profile of which integrins are employed for adhesion to a given disintegrin domain remains unclear. For example, we suggested that the disintegrin domains of mouse sperm ADAMs 2 and 3 can interact with the alpha6beta1 integrin on mouse eggs. Others concluded that these disintegrin domains interact instead with the alpha9beta1 integrin. To address these differing results, we first studied adhesion of mouse F9 embryonal carcinoma cells and human G361 melanoma cells to the disintegrin domains of mouse ADAMs 2 and 3. Both cell lines express alpha6beta1 and alpha9beta1 integrins at their surfaces. Antibodies to the alpha6 integrin subunit inhibited adhesion of both cell lines. An antibody that recognizes human alpha9 integrin inhibited adhesion of G361 cells. VLO5, a snake disintegrin that antagonizes alpha4beta1 and alpha9beta1 integrins, potently inhibited adhesion of both cell lines. We next explored expression of the alpha9 integrin subunit in mouse eggs. In contrast to our ability to detect alpha6beta1, we were unable to convincingly detect alpha9beta1 integrin on the surface of mouse eggs. Moreover, treatment of mouse eggs with 250 nm VLO5, which is 250 fold over its approximately IC(50) for inhibition of somatic cell adhesion, had minimal effect on sperm-egg binding or fusion. We did detect alpha9 integrin protein on epithelial cells of the oviduct. Additional studies showed that antibodies to the alpha6 and alpha7 integrins additively inhibited adhesion of mouse trophoblast stem cells and that an antibody to the alpha4 integrin inhibited adhesion of MOLT-3 cells to these disintegrin domains: Our data suggest that multiple integrins (on the same cell) can participate in adhesion to a given ADAM disintegrin domain and that interactions between ADAMs and integrins may be important for sperm transit through the oviduct.