SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Progestins”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

PubMed2003

Metabolic and vascular effect of progestins in post-menopausal women. Implications for cardioprotection.

Estrogen therapy causes changes in a variety of cardiovascular risk factors, including insulin resistance, lipoprotein profile, haemostasis, coronary atherosclerosis and vascular reactive, that suggest a potential cardioprotective effect in postmenopausal women. With respect to the role of adjunctive progestins, currently available data suggest that the cardiovascular effects may differ depending on the type, dosage and route of administration of the progestin. Androgenic progestins antagonise the favourable cardiovascular effect of estrogens, whilst non-androgenic progestins do not impair, or may even enhance, the beneficial effect of estrogens. Therefore, less androgenic progestins would appear to be the agent of choice for combined hormone therapy in postmenopausal women with cardiovascular risk factors.

Blood Pressure↗

PubMed2003

Differential effects of progestins on the brain.

Interactions exist between progestins and the gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptor subtype A where C(21)-steroids function as activators. Other interactions between progesterone and neurotransmitter systems include stimulation of dopamine release in striatal tissue, stimulation of GnRH release from hypothalamic neurons and inhibition of opioid receptor binding and activation. Cyproterone acetate increases dopaminergic responses and binds to opiate receptors independently of its classical effect on the androgen receptor. Progesterone substitution in perimenopausal women promotes length and quality of sleep. This effect seems most prominent for progesterone administered vaginally. Progestins also play a role in the pathogenesis of migraine. Migraine symptoms occur predominantly during the perimenstrual stage. Women who suffer from menstrual migraine triggered by premenstrual progesterone loss often benefit from cyclic progesterone administration. This may be because progesterone and allopregnenolone reduce meningeal release of substance P and inhibit the development of neurogenic oedema. Women whose migraine symptoms subside during pregnancy, however, benefit from intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate. Progesterone, generated from pregnenolone by Schwann cells, also enhances myelin synthesis. Myelination of axons is promoted when progesterone is added to cultures of rat dorsal root ganglia. No reliable data exist with respect to the effects of other progestins on demyelinating disease. Progestins promote the growth of meningioma as progesterone receptors predominate in meningioma tissue. Progesterone and synthetic progestins should therefore not be prescribed in these patients.

Brain Chemistry↗

PubMed2003

Overview on the effects of progestins on bone.

In view of the fact that fractures are the clinically relevant events, risk factors for fractures are discussed first. Bone mineral density (BMD) appears to be a much less important risk factor for the most severe hip fractures than the risk of falling. No results of experimental studies on hormones and fractures at advanced age are available. An overview of the effects of progestins on bone is given. Effects of progestins on bone have been studied by in vitro experiments using cell lines and by more relevant clinical observations. Prospective studies have been conducted following the use of progestins contained in oral contraceptives, alone or in combination with oestrogens; long-term contraception by injection of depot preparations; so-called "add-back" hormonal therapy attempting to reverse the adverse effects of gonadotropin releasing hormone agonists on bone and after different regimens of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women. From the data there are no indications that the various progestins, used in clinical practice, have either a bone-protective or an oestrogen antagonistic activity. Progestins do not add or subtract much of the protective action of oestrogens on the bones.

Bone and Bones↗

PubMed2005

S14 protein in breast cancer cells: direct evidence of regulation by SREBP-1c, superinduction with progestin, and effects on cell growth.

Most breast cancers exhibit brisk lipogenesis, and require it for growth. S14 is a lipogenesis-related nuclear protein that is overexpressed in most breast cancers. Sterol response element-binding protein-1c (SREBP-1c) is required for induction of lipogenesis-related genes, including S14 and fatty acid synthase (FAS), in hepatocytes, and correlation of SREBP-1c and FAS expression suggested that SREBP-1c drives lipogenesis in tumors as well. We directly tested the hypothesis that SREBP-1c drives S14 expression and mediates lipogenic effects of progestin in T47D breast cancer cells. Dominant-negative SREBP-1c inhibited induction of S14 and FAS mRNAs by progestin, while active SREBP-1c induced without hormone and superinduced in its presence. Changes in S14 mRNA were reflected in protein levels. A lag time and lack of progestin response elements indicated that S14 and FAS gene activation by progestin is indirect. Knockdown of S14 reduced, whereas overexpression stimulated, T47D cell growth, while nonlipogenic MCF10a mammary epithelial cells were not growth-inhibited. These data directly demonstrate that SREBP-1c drives S14 gene expression in breast cancer cells, and progestin magnifies that effect via an indirect mechanism. This supports the prediction, based on S14 gene amplification and overexpression in breast tumors, that S14 augments breast cancer cell growth and survival.

Basic Helix-Loop-Helix Leucine Zipper Transcriptio↗

PubMed2002

Effects of progestins in different hormone replacement therapy formulations on estrogen-induced lipid changes in postmenopausal women.

Hormone replacement therapy (HRT), used by many women to relieve the symptoms of menopause and for the prevention of osteoporosis, is available in an increasing number of formulations. Options include various combinations of estrogen and progestin as well as different routes of administration. For women with a uterus, who require a progestin, a convenient and commonly used option is combining the estrogen and progestin in a single pill. Such formulations have the lipid-modifying effects of estrogen, altered to specific type and dose of progestin used. The cardioprotective increases in levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol associated with exogenous estrogen may be blunted or even reversed with certain HRT regimens. In addition, some progestins minimize the increase in triglycerides that occurs with exogenous estrogen, whereas others do not. Because of the importance of lipid markers as risk factors for cardiovascular disease in postmenopausal women, these lipid effects should be carefully considered when selecting an HRT regimen.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed1997

Estrogen and progestin components of oral contraceptives: relationship to vascular disease.

Recently, new information has been published about: a) the relationship between combination oral contraceptives (OCs), estrogen dose, cigarette smoking, and the risk of myocardial infarction (MI) and stroke; and b) the effect of different progestins on the risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). We review the epidemiologic data. Regardless of age, in the absence of smoking, use of sub-50 micrograms OCs is not associated with any meaningful increase in risk of MI or stroke. If the small, statistically nonsignificant elevations in risk for these diseases are assumed (for the sake of argument) to be causal, then the incidence of MI and stroke associated with use of OCs containing less than 50 micrograms ethinyl estradiol (EE) would be approximately 2 per 100,000 per year. For women less than 35 years of age who do not smoke or do not have a history of hypertension, the risk would be even lower. Any woman over the age of 35 who smokes should be advised to use a non-estrogen or nonhormonal contraceptive. There are now two reports, from jick et al. and Lewis et al., that demonstrate that the relative risk of MI is certainly no greater for users of OCs containing desogestrel or gestodene than for users of OCs containing older progestins. In fact, both show reduced relative risks for the newer progestins compared to the older ones. With respect to progestins, four recent epidemiologic studies have indicated a twofold increased risk of nonfatal VTE with use of OCs containing desogestrel or gestodene compared with levonorgestrel. A fifth report, which showed an increased relative risk for norgestimate, is based on use among only 19 cases and 31 controls and is not statistically significant. As the authors themselves caution and as subsequent follow-up analyses and editorials conclude, these studies do not provide evidence for a cause-and-effect relationship between OCs containing desogestrel or gestodene, and VTE. The recommendation with respect to desogestrel- and gestodene-containing OCs is that no change in prescribing practices is warranted for either current or new-start patients. There is a growing body of evidence demonstrating that OCs containing 30 or 35 micrograms of EE have lower risks of MI, stroke, and VTE than higher dose OCs. However, there is no epidemiologic study that demonstrates a greater risk of vascular events among women using OCs containing 30 or 35 micrograms EE compared with preparations containing 20 micrograms EE. Users of sub-50 micrograms OCs of any age have no clinically meaningful increase in incidence of MI or stroke compared with non-OC users. This is also true for smokers under the age of 35 years who use OCs. However, smokers over the age of 35 years who use OCs still have an unacceptably high incidence rate of MI and stroke and should not use combination OCs. Sub-50 micrograms OCs of all types are associated with a small excess risk of VTE, about 15 per 100,000 events per year. Until there is biologic explanation of the twofold greater risk of VTE in users of OCs containing desogestrel or gestodene compared with users of those containing older progestins, this association should not be accepted as one of cause and effect.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗

PubMed1993

Sequential regimen of the antiprogesterone RU486 and synthetic progestin for contraception.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of sequential use of the antiprogesterone RU486 and synthetic progestin on ovarian function of healthy women. DESIGN: Healthy women were given a sequential antiprogesterone-progestin treatment. Blood samples were taken twice a week during one control cycle and one to three treatment cycles; prospective analysis. SETTING: The outpatient clinic of the Helsinki City Maternity Hospital, Helsinki, Finland, and Steroid Research Laboratory, Department of Medical Chemistry, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. PATIENTS: Eleven healthy women, volunteers, 20 to 34 years of age. INTERVENTIONS: A dose of 25 mg/d of RU486 was given during cycle days 1 to 21, and synthetic progestin (5 mg of norethisterone to six and 5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate to five women) during cycle days 22 to 31. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Serum P, E2, FSH, and LH were measured from serum samples. RESULTS: In 20 of the 24 treatment cycles analyzed the serum concentrations of P were anovulatory. In the remaining 4 cycles, P levels rose above 3 ng/mL, suggestive of ovulation. Folliculogenesis was not completely inhibited, but serum E2 profiles were subnormal and delayed. Bleeding control was satisfactory. CONCLUSIONS: Antiprogesterone RU486 hampers or delays follicular development, suggesting a possible use as an estrogen-free oral contraceptive. However, the synthetic progestins used in this regimen induced serum P rises in some cycles. The synthetic progestin provides the cycle control, but its possible effect on the reliability of the method remains to be evaluated.

Adult↗

PubMed1993

A possible bimodal effect of estrogen on insulin sensitivity in postmenopausal women and the attenuating effect of added progestin.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of estrogen and of added progestin on carbohydrate tolerance in postmenopausal women. DESIGN: An insulin tolerance test (ITT) was used to assess insulin resistance in healthy post-menopausal women and to determine the effects of oral estrogen with and without added progestin on insulin sensitivity. SETTING: A menopause research clinic at a University Medical Center. PATIENTS: Fifteen healthy postmenopausal and nine premenopausal women were studied after having not received any hormone preparations for > or = 4 weeks. INTERVENTIONS: All subjects received a baseline ITT and postmenopausal women were then randomized to receive either 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen, 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen/10 mg progestin, or 1.25 mg conjugated equine estrogen for 2 months at which time a second ITT was performed. In the former two groups the women were treated for an additional 4 months to assess the long-term effects of treatment and had a third ITT performed at the end of 6 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fasting serum insulin and glucose were measured and K(itt) values were obtained at each visit in each group. RESULTS: Forty-four percent of nonobese healthy postmenopausal women were found to have insulin resistance. The three groups differed significantly in their K(itt) responses. Estrogen replacement improved insulin sensitivity (K(itt) increased by 25%). However, 1.25 mg of conjugated equine estrogen caused a 24.7% decrease in K(itt) values and progestins attenuated the beneficial effects of 0.625 mg conjugated equine estrogen from baseline values (K(itt) decreased by 17.0%). Two- and 6-month values did not differ. CONCLUSIONS: Insulin resistance is prevalent in healthy postmenopausal women. A moderate dose of estrogen appears to increase insulin sensitivity but higher doses may attenuate this benefit and progestins may cause a decrease in insulin sensitivity.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Progestin implants.

Progestin implants for contraception are highly effective, safe, and the most convenient choice for many women. Progestin implants currently on the market, preparing for launch, or under investigation are reviewed here. Their basic galenic and pharmacokinetic features, as well as their contraceptive effectiveness, are described. The first progestin-only contraceptive implant placed on the market was Norplant, a multiunit system. Since then, several single- and double-rod implants have been developed, each using one of four different progestins: levonorgestrel, etonogestrel, Nestorone and nomegestrol acetate. Jadelle is similar to Norplant but consists of only two, rather than six, Silastic rods to simplify insertion and removal; nevertheless, levonorgesterel serum levels are identical, and performance is the same for both systems. The single implant systems reviewed here are: Implanon with a 3-year duration; Nestorone implants for breast feeding and non-breast feeding women lasting up to 2 years; and Uniplant, which is effective for 1 year. The advantages and disadvantages of progestin implants, the importance of counseling for increasing user satisfaction, and the future outlook for this contraceptive method are also discussed.

Administration, Intravaginal↗

PubMed2003

The preclinical biology of a new potent and selective progestin: trimegestone.

Trimegestone (TMG) is a 19-norpregnane progestin being developed, in combination with an estrogen, for the treatment of postmenopausal symptoms. TMG binds to the human progesterone receptor with an affinity greater than medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA), norethindrone (NET), and levonorgestrel (LNG). In contrast, TMG binds with low affinity to the androgen, glucocorticoid and mineralocorticoid receptor and has no measurable affinity for the estrogen receptor. Compared to other progestins, TMG demonstrates an improved separation of its PR affinity from its affinity to other classical steroid hormone receptors. In vivo, TMG has potent progestin activity. For example, TMG produces glandular differentiation of the uterine endometrium in rabbits and is about 30 and 60 times more potent than MPA and NET, respectively. In the rat, TMG maintains pregnancy, induces deciduoma formation, inhibits ovulation and has uterine anti-estrogenic activity. With respect to these endpoints, TMG appears to be more potent and selective on uterine epithelial responses than other classical progestin responses. In vivo, TMG does not have significant androgenic, glucocorticoid, anti-glucocorticoid or mineralocorticoid activity but does have anti-mineralocorticoid activity and modest anti-androgenic effects. This overall profile is qualitatively similar to progesterone. When TMG is administered chronically, it antagonizes the effect of estradiol on the uterus but does not antagonize the beneficial bone sparing activity of estradiol. In rat studies evaluating CNS GABAA receptor modulatory activity, TMG is less active on this likely undesirable endpoint than progesterone and norethindrone acetate, which may translate into fewer mood-related side effects. The results indicate that TMG is a potent and selective progestin with a preclinical profile well suited for hormone replacement therapy.

Animals↗

PubMed2001

The role of neurosteroids and non-genomic effects of progestins and androgens in mediating sexual receptivity of rodents.

Progestins and androgens modulate sexual receptivity in rodents, in part through mechanisms independent of traditional intracellular steroid receptors. Progesterone (PROG) in the ventromedial hypothalamus (VMH) and ventral tegmental (VTA) facilitates lordosis but has different actions in these brain areas. Primarily using lordosis in rodents as an in vivo experimental model, we have examined the effects that progestins exert in the midbrain and hypothalamus. Localization and blocker studies indicate that PROG's actions in the VMH require intracellular progestin receptors (PRs) but in the VTA they do not. Progestins that have rapid, membrane effects, and/or are devoid of affinity for PRs, facilitate lordosis when applied to the VTA. Manipulation of GABA and/or GABA(A)/benzodiazepine receptor complexes (GBRs) in the VTA alters lordosis, which suggests that progestins may interact with GBRs to facilitate receptivity by enhancing the function of GABAergic neurons. Interfering with PROG's metabolism to, or the biosynthesis of, 3alpha-hydroxy-5alpha-pregnan-20-one (3alpha,5alpha-TH PROG or allopregnanolone), the most effective endogenous GBR agonist, in the VTA attenuates female sexual behavior in rodents. Stimulation of mitochondrial benzodiazepine receptors (MBRs), which enhances neurosteroid production, by infusions of an MBR agonist to the VTA enhances lordosis. 3alpha,5alpha-TH PROG is increased in the midbrain of mated>proestrous>diestrous rodents. These data suggest that in the VTA, PROG may facilitate lordosis following metabolism to and/or biosynthesis of 3alpha,5alpha-TH PROG, which may have subsequent actions at GBRs and/or MBRs to acutely modulate female sexual behavior in rodents. The 3alpha-hydroxysteroid oxidoreduced metabolite of dihydrotestosterone (DHT), 5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol (3alpha-androstanediol), is important for termination of sexual receptivity in rodents and has these effects in the absence of functional intracellular androgens receptors. As well, altering GBR function in the hypothalamus can influence 3alpha-androstanediol's inhibition of sexual receptivity. Through actions in the hypothalamus that are independent of intracellular androgen receptors but involving GBRs, 3alpha-androstanediol inhibits lordosis. These findings suggest that the PROG metabolite and pregnane neurosteroid, 3alpha,5alpha-TH PROG, and the testosterone metabolite and androstane neurosteroid, 3alpha-androstanediol, can have proximate influences on lordosis that is via nonclassical actions at intracellular steroid receptors.

Androgens↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Proapoptotic effects of antiestrogens, progestins and androgen in breast cancer cells.

The promoting action of E2 in breast cancer cells has been, until now, mainly linked to its action on prolifieration. Because of the importance of an increase in apoptosis in breast cancer prevention, we have studied the possible effects of various antiestrogens, progestins and an androgen on its occurrence in three hormone-dependent breast cancer cell lines. The antiestrogens were, a triphenylethylene derivative, 4 hydroxytamoxifen (4OHTAM) and two steroidal antiestrogens, IC1182780 and RU58668. The progestins were Org2058, a pregnane derivative, tibolone (OrgOD14), a normethyltestosterone derivative and OrgOM38 (the delta4 isomer of OrgOD14) and the androgen dihydrotestosterone (DHT). Apoptosis was studied in MCF-7, ZR75-1 and T47-D cells using morphological approaches and flow cytometry. The antiestrogens, the progestins and DHT were proapoptotic but to different potencies according to the cell line studied. Indeed, the 'pure' steroidal antiestrogens were more efficient than 4OHTam in increasing apoptosis. We have also studied the level of expression of some of the proteins involved in the regulation of apoptosis. Bcl-2 and bcxL, two antiapoptotic members of the bcl-2 family proteins, were inhibited by the progestins and the antiestrogens. In contrast, the proapoptotic proteins, bax and bak seemed to be constitutively expressed. Thus, since the ratio of proapoptotic and antiapoptotic proteins determines apoptosis or cell survival, the hormone effects are operating by modulating the antiapoptotic regulators of the balance. These data demonstrate that antiestrogens, progestins, and androgens can promote apoptosis in breast cancer cells, an effect which could be of importance in the therapeutic prevention of breast cancer.

Apoptosis↗

PubMed2002

The effect of estrogen-progestin treatment on bone mineral density in anorexia nervosa.

INTRODUCTION: Osteopenia is a serious complication of anorexia nervosa (AN). Although in other states of estrogen deficiency, estrogen replacement therapy increases bone mass, its role in AN remains unresolved. STUDY OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of estrogen-progestin administration on bone mass in AN. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective observational study of 50 adolescents with AN (mean age 16.8 +/- 2.3 yrs) was conducted in a tertiary referral center. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar spine and left hip were prospectively measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry at baseline and annually. INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-two subjects received estrogen-progestin and 28 standard treatment (Rx) alone. Estrogen-progestin was administered daily as an oral contraceptive containing 20-35 mcg ethinyl estradiol. All subjects received calcium supplementation and the same medical, psychological, and nutritional intervention (standard Rx). Mean length of follow-up was 23.1 +/- 11.4 months. RESULTS: At presentation, patients were malnourished (79.5% +/- 7.6% IBW), hypoestrogenemic (estradiol 24.7 +/- 10.7 pg/mL), and had reduced bone mass (lumbar spine BMD -2.01 +/- 0.69 SD below the young adult reference mean). Ninety-two percent of subjects were osteopenic and 26% met WHO criteria for osteoporosis. Body weight, and no treatment group, was the major determinant of BMD. At one-year follow-up, there were no significant differences in absolute values or in net change of lumbar spine or femoral neck BMD between those who received estrogen-progestin and those who received standard Rx (80% power of finding a 3% difference in BMD at 1 yr). In those followed for 2-3 yrs, osteopenia was persistent and in some cases progressive. CONCLUSION: In our study population, estrogen-progestin did not significantly increase BMD compared with standard Rx. These results question the common practice of prescribing hormone replacement therapy to increase bone mass in AN.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1988

The use of combined estrogen-progestin replacement therapy.

The evaluation of innovations which use old technology poses different problems than does the evaluation of new technologies. The main necessity is the targeting of its use rather than the technology itself. The need to evaluate the extent of use and its problems is illustrated by the example of progestin use among menopausal and postmenopausal women in the United States. There progestins are not officially approved for use in menopause, even though they have been on the market for a long time with other indications. Estrogen-replacement therapy was widely used from the early 1960s until 1975, when the claim that estrogens cause endometrial cancer notably decreased their use. The use of estrogens increased again in the early 1980s, and one reason for this revival was the claim that progestins offered protection against endometrial cancer. When recommendations for combined estrogen-progestin therapy have been made, other health effects have been ignored. Two consensus conferences as well as the drug control authority have recommended against combined estrogen-progestin therapy until further research is completed. Absence of good research, specialization in medicine, and advantages for prescribers and the drug industry may have contributed to the wide use of this unassessed treatment. Possible solutions for prevention of the diffusion of these kinds of innovations are discussed.

Communication↗

PubMed2001

High-dose progestins for the treatment of cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome: a systematic review of randomised clinical trials.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to summarise evidence from scientific studies on cancer anorexia-cachexia syndrome in order to assess and highlight the efficacy of high-dose progestins (megestrol acetate and medroxyprogesterone acetate) compared with placebo in patients with hormone-independent tumors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review of published randomised clinical trials was carried out by an extensive electronic and hand search through databases, relevant journals and books, congress, proceedings, reference lists, without any language or year of publication restriction. The research was conducted by two independent operators who collected the data in a form specifically designed for this review. Among the several possible outcomes, appetite and body weight were chosen. RESULTS: Fifteen randomised clinical trials (more than 2000 patients) were retrieved for the review. There was a statistically significant advantage for high-dose progestins as regards improved appetite: pooled odds ratio (OR) = 4.23, 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.53-7.04. Although the effect of high-dose progestins on body weight was less impressive, statistical significance was also reached for this outcome: pooled OR = 2.66, 95% CI: 1.80-3.92. Treatment morbidity was very low, due to the brief period of the treatment in most of the studies. CONCLUSIONS: The effects of high-dose progestins on appetite and body weight were clearly demonstrated. However, further studies are undoubtedly warranted to investigate other aspects of progestin activity, especially as regards dosage, duration and timing with best therapeutic index.

Anorexia↗

PubMed1980

Characterization of rat hypothalamic progestin binding by spheroidal hydroxylapatite chromatography.

The progestin-high-affinity-binding components in rat target tissues have been assayed by a simple and precise procedure by using spheroidal hydroxylapatite. The progestin 'receptors' in the uterus and hypothalamus of female rats are highly specific for progestins, which they bind with high affinity (Kd for [3H]progesterone in hypothalamus is 1.9 nM and in uterus is 3.7 nM). The dissociation of [3H]progesterone from receptor in vitro is rapid: t1/2 6 degrees C = 45 min in uterine cytosol; t1/2 6 degrees C = 160 min in hypothalamic cytosol. The binding is destroyed by proteinase. In the cytosol of hypothalamus and cortex of developing rats, progestin 'receptors' were present in both male and female rats by 2-3 days after birth; subsequent changes in concentration of these 'receptors' appeared to be independent of sex. Concentrations of progestin 'receptor' were close to adult values by 8-9 days, and thereafter changed relatively little.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Effects of estrogen plus progestin on health-related quality of life.

BACKGROUND: The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) and other clinical trials indicate that significant health risks are associated with combination hormone use. Less is known about the effect of hormone therapy on health-related quality of life. METHODS: The WHI randomly assigned 16,608 postmenopausal women 50 to 79 years of age (mean, 63) with an intact uterus at base line to estrogen plus progestin (0.625 mg of conjugated equine estrogen plus 2.5 mg of medroxyprogesterone acetate, in 8506 women) or placebo (in 8102 women). Quality-of-life measures were collected at base line and at one year in all women and at three years in a subgroup of 1511 women. RESULTS: Randomization to estrogen plus progestin resulted in no significant effects on general health, vitality, mental health, depressive symptoms, or sexual satisfaction. The use of estrogen plus progestin was associated with a statistically significant but small and not clinically meaningful benefit in terms of sleep disturbance, physical functioning, and bodily pain after one year (the mean benefit in terms of sleep disturbance was 0.4 point on a 20-point scale, in terms of physical functioning 0.8 point on a 100-point scale, and in terms of pain 1.9 points on a 100-point scale). At three years, there were no significant benefits in terms of any quality-of-life outcomes. Among women 50 to 54 years of age with moderate-to-severe vasomotor symptoms at base line, estrogen and progestin improved vasomotor symptoms and resulted in a small benefit in terms of sleep disturbance but no benefit in terms of the other quality-of-life outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial in postmenopausal women, estrogen plus progestin did not have a clinically meaningful effect on health-related quality of life.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Preclinical profiles of progestins used in formulations of oral contraceptives and hormone replacement therapy.

Progestins used in oral contraceptive formulations available in the United States include norgestimate, desogestrel, norethindrone, norethindrone acetate, and levonorgestrel. Progestins used in the United States in continuous and intermittent formulations of hormone replacement therapy are norgestimate, medroxyprogesterone acetate, and norethindrone acetate. The chemical structure of a progestin determines its relative binding affinity for the progesterone and androgen receptors, as well as the sex hormone binding globulin in human serum, and determines its clinical profile. Overall, the properties of levonorgestrel or norethindrone acetate in this regard differ from norgestimate and are more conducive to androgenic stimulation. Estrogen replacement offers cardioprotective effects in postmenopausal women. Progestins are added to hormone replacement therapy to counteract the well-known increased risk of endometrial hyperplasia associated with the use of unopposed estrogen. Animal models show that for some parameters, including improvement of lipid profiles, progestins can diminish the cardioprotective effect of estrogen. Initial animal studies of norgestimate combined with estrogen do not show an attenuation of estrogenic effects.

Animals↗