PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Reconstruction”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources
PubMed1994

Breast reconstruction in older women.

BACKGROUND: More than 50% of breast cancer care in the United States occurs in women over age 65 years. This study investigates age-related differences in breast reconstruction practices after mastectomy for breast cancer. METHODS: Retrospective review of University of Michigan Breast Care Center patients revealed 242 female patients with breast cancer who underwent postmastectomy breast reconstruction from 1980 through 1991. Data were complied concerning patient age, reconstruction interval (immediate or delayed), type of breast reconstruction performed, reconstruction-associated complications, and the number of postreconstruction procedures required to obtain the final result. Statistical comparisons were made with the chi-squared test. RESULTS: There were 224 patients aged less than 60 years (range 27 to 59 years; median, 44 years) and 18 patients aged 60 years or more (oldest, 68 years). Of the 18 older patients, three underwent delayed transverse rectus abdominus muscle (TRAM) reconstruction; one received a delayed latissimus dorsi flap placed over a silicone gel prosthesis, and 14 underwent 18 reconstructions (4 bilateral) with silicone gel implants (6 immediate, 12 delayed). The younger patients underwent 269 breast reconstructions (45 bilateral), including 92 autogenous tissue reconstructions (34 immediate TRAM, 58 delayed TRAM), 60 immediate and 88 delayed insertions of an expander or prosthesis, and 29 latissimus dorsi flaps with implant reconstructions (3 immediate, 26 delayed). Seven complications (32%) occurred in the 22 breast reconstructions performed in older women, including capsular contracture surrounding an implant (six patients) and a ventral hernia in one patient with a TRAM flap. Complications occurred in 134 breast reconstructions (50%) performed in younger women. All were related to the reconstruction. In the older women a mean of 1.7 +/- 0.7 operations was required to achieve a final reconstruction result versus 2.1 +/- 1.1 in the younger women (not significant). More operations were required in younger women undergoing prosthetic reconstruction than in older women, but this difference was not statistically significant (2.4 +/- 1.2 versus 1.9 +/- 0.7; p = 0.07). Autogenous tissue reconstruction was performed less frequently in older women (14% versus 34%; p < 0.05). No age-related difference was noted in the rate of immediate (versus delayed) reconstruction (27% versus 36%, respectively). Complications occurred more frequently in women who underwent prosthetic breast reconstruction, particularly in younger women (32% in older women and 64% in younger women; p < 0.01). The complication rate for immediate breast reconstruction in older women (all prosthetic) was less than in younger women (17% versus 59%; p < 0.05). For delayed prosthetic reconstructions, complications also occurred less frequently in older than younger women (38% versus 67%; p < 0.05). Between 1988 and 1992, 91 older women and 180 younger women underwent mastectomy for breast cancer; only 7% of older women versus 38% of younger women underwent breast reconstruction (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction is a safe option for older women requiring mastectomy. The full array of reconstruction options (autogenous tissue or implants, immediate or delayed) should be considered for use in women of all ages.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Trends in unilateral breast reconstruction and management of the contralateral breast: the Emory experience.

Recent trends in breast reconstruction have transitioned toward the skin-sparing type of mastectomy and immediate reconstruction using autologous tissue. This study was designed to document trends in the management of patients with unilateral breast cancer and to determine how they influence management of the contralateral breast. All patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospitals from January of 1975 to December of 1999 were reviewed. The cohort was stratified by timing of reconstruction (immediate versus delayed), method of reconstruction, and mastectomy type (skin-sparing versus non-skin-sparing). The methods of reconstruction included implant, latissimus dorsi flap, and transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flap. Contralateral procedures to achieve symmetry included augmentation, mastopexy, augmentation/mastopexy, and reduction. A total of 1394 patients were evaluated, including 689 delayed and 705 immediate reconstructions. Sixty-seven percent of delayed-reconstruction patients (462 of 689) had a symmetry procedure performed on the opposite breast, compared with 22 percent for the immediate-reconstruction patients (155 of 705) (p </= 0.001). The percentage of times a contralateral procedure was performed was highest for implant reconstructions (89 percent delayed and 57 percent immediate) and lowest for TRAM flap reconstructions (59 percent delayed and 18 percent immediate). Augmentation mammaplasty was the most common symmetry procedure for implant reconstruction (41 percent), whereas reduction was the most common procedure for autologous tissue reconstruction (57 percent). Immediate unilateral breast reconstructions were stratified into non-skin-sparing mastectomy (n = 205) and skin-sparing mastectomy (n = 500). Thirty-four percent of patients with a non-skin-sparing mastectomy defect (70 of 205) underwent a contralateral breast procedure, compared with 17 percent of patients with a skin-sparing mastectomy defect (85 of 500) (p = 0.001). The percentage of times a contralateral procedure was performed in immediate reconstruction, stratified by mastectomy and reconstruction type, was only significant for TRAM flap reconstructions (25 versus 11 percent). Trends in the management of unilateral breast cancer from delayed to immediate reconstruction and from implants to autologous tissue have reduced the incidence of contralateral symmetry procedures. Reduction mammaplasty is the most common symmetry procedure used for autologous tissue reconstruction, with augmentation predominating when implants are used. The type of mastectomy also effects the management of the opposite breast, with skin-sparing mastectomy further reducing the incidence of contralateral procedures in immediate TRAM flap reconstruction, compared with non-skin-sparing mastectomy.

Breast Implants↗
PubMed2004

Biomechanical analysis of reconstructions for sternoclavicular joint instability.

BACKGROUND: A variety of reconstructive methods have been described for the treatment of sternoclavicular joint instability, yet none have been analyzed in the laboratory, to our knowledge. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate three different reconstruction techniques with use of a cadaveric model: (1) intramedullary ligament reconstruction, (2) subclavius tendon reconstruction, and (3) reconstruction with use of a semitendinosus graft placed in a figure-of-eight fashion through drill-holes in the clavicle and manubrium. METHODS: Thirty-six fresh cadaveric specimens were mounted supine on a materials testing machine in a custom testing fixture and were subjected to anterior and posterior subfailure translation to determine stiffness in the intact state after preloading. One of the three reconstruction methods was performed, and the specimens were subjected to anterior or posterior translation to failure. Changes in stiffness compared with the intact state were analyzed statistically. RESULTS: In the anterior direction, the stiffness of the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction was significantly greater than that of the intramedullary ligament reconstruction but was not significantly different from that of the subclavius tendon reconstruction. The peak load to failure (as defined by translation equal to the anteroposterior diameter of the medial head of the clavicle) was 230.3 +/- 146.1 N for the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction, 84.6 +/- 45.7 N for the intramedullary ligament reconstruction, and 75.6 +/- 19.0 N for the subclavius tendon reconstruction. In the posterior direction, the stiffness of the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction was significantly greater than those of both of the other reconstructions. The peak load to failure was 241.4 +/- 49.7 N for the semitendinosus figure-of-eight reconstruction, 85.0 +/- 22.8 N for the intramedullary ligament reconstruction, and 51.5 +/- 28.9 N for the subclavius tendon reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The figure-of-eight semitendinosus reconstruction for sternoclavicular joint instability has initial biomechanical properties that are superior to those of the intramedullary ligament reconstruction and subclavius tendon reconstruction techniques. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: While it is difficult to extrapolate in vitro data to the clinical situation, the figure-of-eight semitendinosus technique has superior initial biomechanical properties and may produce improved clinical outcomes in the surgical treatment of sternoclavicular joint instability.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

Complications and patient satisfaction following expander/implant breast reconstruction with and without radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To compare the rates of complications and patient satisfaction among breast cancer patients treated with mastectomy and tissue expander/implant reconstruction with and without radiotherapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: As part of the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study (MBROS), breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy with reconstruction were prospectively evaluated with respect to complications, general patient satisfaction with reconstruction, and esthetic satisfaction. Included in this study was a cohort of women who underwent breast reconstruction using an expander/implant (E/I). A subset of these patients also received radiotherapy (RT). At 1 and 2 years postoperatively, a survey was administered which included 7 items assessing both general satisfaction with their reconstruction and esthetic satisfaction. Complication data were also obtained at the same time points using hospital chart review. Radiotherapy patients identified in the University of Michigan Radiation Oncology database that underwent expander/implant reconstruction but not enrolled in the MBROS study were also added to the analysis. RESULTS: Eighty-one patients underwent mastectomy and E/I reconstruction. Nineteen patients received RT and 62 underwent reconstruction without RT. The median dose delivered to the reconstructed breast/chest wall, including boost, was 60.4 Gy (range, 50.0-66.0 Gy) in 1.8- to 2.0-Gy fractions. With a median follow-up of 31 months from the date of surgery, complications occurred in 68% (13/19) of the RT patients compared to 31% (19/62) in the no RT group (p = 0.006). Twelve of 81 patients (15%) had a breast reconstruction failure. Reconstruction failure was significantly associated with experiencing a complication (p = 0.0001) and the use of radiotherapy (p = 0.005). The observed reconstruction failure rates were 37% (7/19) and 8% (5/62) for patients treated with and without radiotherapy, respectively. Tamoxifen was associated with a borderline risk of complications (p = 0.07) and a significant risk of reconstruction failure (p = 0.01). Sixty-six patients of the study group completed the satisfaction survey; 15 patients did not. To offset potential bias for patients not completing the survey, we analyzed satisfaction data assuming "dissatisfaction" scores for surveys not completed. In the analysis of patients with unilateral E/I placement, reconstruction failure was significantly associated with a lower general satisfaction (p = 0.03). Ten percent of patients experiencing a reconstruction failure were generally satisfied compared to 23% who completed E/I reconstruction. In addition, tamoxifen use was associated with a significantly decreased esthetic satisfaction (p = 0.03). Radiotherapy was not associated with significantly decreased general or esthetic satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Irradiated patients had a higher rate of expander/implant reconstruction failure and complications than nonirradiated patients. Despite these differences, our pilot data suggest that both general satisfaction and patient esthetic satisfaction were not significantly different following radiotherapy compared to patients who did not receive RT. Although statistical power was limited in the present study and larger patient numbers are needed to validate these results, this study suggests comparable patient assessment of cosmetic outcome with or without radiotherapy in women who successfully complete expander/implant reconstruction.

Adult↗
PubMed2001

Outcome comparison between free and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient.

Obesity can be a contraindication for TRAM flap breast reconstruction. This study reviewed the authors' experience with free TRAM and pedicled TRAM flap breast reconstruction in the obese patient to examine the complication rates associated with each reconstructive method and to determine whether TRAM flap reconstruction can safely be used in these high-risk patients. The records of 221 consecutive TRAM flap reconstructions were reviewed. Preoperative risk factors for morbidity were noted, as well as the incidence of TRAM flap success, operative time, length of hospital stay, and postoperative complications. Patients were categorized as obese if their body mass index was greater than 25.8 kg/m2. Data were tabulated using contingency tables and analyzed using chi-squared statistics. Multiple logistic regression was used to determine risk factors for flap complications. Of the 221 patients studied, 114 patients were found to be obese (body mass index >25.8 kg/m2). Of these 114 patients, 78 were reconstructed with free TRAM flaps and 36 were reconstructed with pedicled flaps. In these obese patients, the average body mass index was 32 kg/m2 in the free TRAM and 30 kg/m2 in the pedicled TRAM flap reconstructions. There were no significant differences between groups with regard to age or preoperative risk factors. Length of hospital stay and operative time did not differ significantly between the two reconstructive methods. The average duration of follow-up was 24 months in both groups. Complications occurred in 26 percent of free TRAM flap reconstructions and 33 percent of pedicled reconstructions. There was no significant difference between reconstructive methods with regard to overall complication rates. Increasing body mass index was found to have a significant effect on free TRAM flap complications (p = 0.008) but not on pedicled TRAM flap complications. There were no partial or total flap losses in obese free TRAM flap patients; however, there was one case of total flap loss and four cases of partial flap loss in the obese pedicled TRAM flap group. The incidence of flap loss was significantly higher when pedicled TRAM flaps were used for reconstruction in obese patients (p = 0.04). Obese patients who underwent reconstruction with pedicled TRAM flaps were more likely to experience a complication if they also smoked (p = 0.001). There was no significant difference in operating time or length of stay when pedicled and free TRAM flap reconstructions in obese patients were compared. There were more cases of flap necrosis in the pedicled TRAM flap group. Free TRAM flaps may provide some benefit in reducing partial flap loss in obese patients, but overall complication rates were not significantly different between reconstructive methods. Of 114 patients, there was only one case of total reconstructive failure. From these findings, it seems that the free or pedicled TRAM flap can be used successfully for breast reconstruction in the majority of patients with obesity. Surgeons should use the technique with which they are most familiar to obtain consistent results.

Body Mass Index↗
PubMed2004

Delayed-immediate breast reconstruction.

In patients with early-stage breast cancer who are scheduled to undergo mastectomy and desire breast reconstruction, the optimal timing of reconstruction depends on whether postmastectomy radiation therapy will be needed. Immediate reconstruction offers the best aesthetic outcomes if postmastectomy radiation therapy is not needed, but if postmastectomy radiation therapy is required, delayed reconstruction is preferable to avoid potential aesthetic and radiation-delivery problems. Unfortunately, the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy cannot be reliably determined until review of the permanent tissue sections. The authors recently implemented a two-stage approach, delayed-immediate breast reconstruction, to optimize reconstruction in patients at risk for requiring postmastectomy radiation therapy when the need for postmastectomy radiation therapy is not known at the time of mastectomy. Stage 1 consists of skin-sparing mastectomy with insertion of a completely filled textured saline tissue expander. After review of permanent sections, patients who did not require post-mastectomy radiation therapy underwent immediate reconstruction (stage 2) and patients who required postmastectomy radiation therapy completed postmastectomy radiation therapy and then underwent standard delayed reconstruction. In this study, the feasibility and outcomes of this approach were reviewed. Fourteen patients were treated with delayed-immediate reconstruction between May of 2002 and June of 2003. Twelve patients had unilateral reconstruction and two patients had bilateral reconstruction, for a total of 16 treated breasts. All patients completed stage 1. Tissue expanders were inserted subpectorally in 15 breasts and subcutaneously in one breast. The mean intraoperative expander fill volume was 475 cc (range, 250 to 750 cc). Three patients required postmastectomy radiation therapy and underwent delayed reconstruction. Eleven patients did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy. Nine patients had 11 breast reconstructions (stage 2), six with free transverse rectus abdominis musculocutaneous (TRAM) flaps, one with a superior gluteal artery perforator flap, and four with a latissimus dorsi flap plus an implant. The median interval between stages was 13 days (range, 11 to 22 days). Two patients who did not require postmastectomy radiation therapy have not yet had stage 2 reconstruction, one because she wished to delay reconstruction and the other because she required additional tissue expansion before permanent implant placement. Six complications occurred. The stage 1 complications involved two cases of mastectomy skin necrosis in patients who required post-mastectomy radiation therapy; one patient required removal of the subcutaneously placed expander before postmastectomy radiation therapy and the other patient had a subpectorally placed expander that only required local wound care. The stage 2 complications were a recipient-site seroma in a patient with a latissimus dorsi flap, a recipient-site hematoma in the patient with the superior gluteal artery perforator flap, and two arterial thromboses in patients with TRAM flaps. Both TRAM flaps were salvaged. Delayed-immediate reconstruction is technically feasible and safe in patients with early-stage breast cancer who may require postmastectomy radiation therapy. With this approach, patients who do not require postmastectomy radiation therapy can achieve aesthetic outcomes essentially the same as those with immediate reconstruction, and patients who require postmastectomy radiation therapy can avoid the aesthetic and radiation-delivery problems that can occur after an immediate breast reconstruction.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Posttraumatic thumb reconstruction.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After reading this article, the reader should be able to: 1. Discuss the critical anatomic features of the thumb as they affect on reconstructive decision making. 2. Define the goals of reconstruction. 3. Discuss an algorithm for thumb reconstruction according to the level of amputation. 4. Understand the role of prosthetics in thumb reconstruction. BACKGROUND: The function of the thumb is critical to overall hand function. Uniquely endowed with anatomic features that allow circumduction and opposition, the thumb enables activities of pinch, grasp, and fine manipulation that are essential in daily life. Destruction of the thumb secondary to trauma represents a much more significant loss than would result from loss of any other digit. Therefore, significant effort has been focused on thumb reconstruction. Numerous techniques have been described, ranging from simple osteoplastic techniques to complex microsurgical procedures. With an appreciation of the unique anatomic properties of the thumb, the hand surgeon is better able to understand the goals of thumb reconstruction and to develop an algorithm for thumb reconstruction. With such an understanding, an individualized reconstructive plan can be developed for each patient. METHODS: A great many options are available for posttraumatic thumb reconstruction. Optimal results are obtained by pursuing an organized and logical approach to reconstruction based upon the level of tissue loss. Reconstruction methods depend on the location of the amputation and range from homodigital and heterodigital flaps to partial-toe transfer or a great-toe wrap-around flap to first-web-space deepening using Z-plasties, a dorsal rotation flap, or a distant flap, to distraction osteogenesis, lengthening of the thumb ray, spare parts from another injured digit in the acute setting for pollicization or heterotopic replantation, and microvascular toe transfer. RESULTS: Amputations in the distal third of the thumb are generally well-tolerated. The primary reconstructive issues are the restoration of a padded and sensate soft-tissue cover, as well as aesthetic considerations. First-web-space deepening will generally provide excellent results for amputations at the distal half of the middle third. In the proximal half of the middle third, lengthening of the thumb ray is generally required. Distraction lengthening of the first metacarpal is a useful and reliable technique that provides up to 3 cm of length without requiring complex microsurgical methods. Spare parts from another injured digit may be used in the acute setting for pollicization or heterotopic replantation. Microvascular toe transfer is an excellent option for elective reconstruction. However, other options also are available and may be more appropriate in some cases. Less ideal options include the various types of osteoplastic reconstruction. CONCLUSIONS: The reconstruction of posttraumatic thumb defects is a challenging and rewarding surgical endeavor. The value of a functioning thumb is immense, and its reconstruction is worthy of considerable effort. Despite the elegant reconstructive options available, the best results are obtained with replantation or revascularization whenever possible. Finally, the treatment plan always must be derived from a careful assessment of each patient's posttraumatic function and specific reconstructive needs.

Algorithms↗
PubMed2002

Comparison of quality of multiplanar reconstructions and direct coronal multidetector CT scans of the lung.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the quality of coronal multiplanar reconstructions with the quality of direct coronal thin-section multidetector CT (MDCT) scans. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Axial multidetector CT (MDCT) scans were obtained through the entire lung in 10 normal autopsy lung specimens using an MDCT scanner. Four protocols were used: 0.5-mm collimation with a 0.5-mm reconstruction interval; 0.5-mm collimation with a 0.3-mm reconstruction interval; 1-mm collimation with a 0.5-mm reconstruction interval; and 2-mm collimation with a 1-mm reconstruction interval. Multiplanar reconstruction images with 0.5-mm slice thickness were obtained from the four types of data sets. Direct coronal thin-section CT of the same 10 autopsy lung specimens was performed using 0.5-mm scan collimation, a 0.3-mm reconstruction interval, a 25.6-cm field of view, and a 512 x 512 matrix. Two independent observers compared the image quality of each of the four coronal multiplanar reconstruction sets with that of direct coronal thin-section CT scans. The observers analyzed visualization of anatomic features and artifacts. RESULTS: The total image quality of the multiplanar reconstructions obtained from 0.5-mm collimation data with or without 0.3-mm overlapping reconstruction was equal to that of direct coronal thin-section CT scans in all 20 interpretations. The image quality of multiplanar reconstruction images from 0.5-mm collimation data either with or without overlapping reconstruction was superior to multiplanar reconstruction images obtained from 1- or 2-mm collimation scans (p < 0.01, Fisher's exact test). Stairstep artifacts in multiplanar reconstructions using 0.5-mm collimation without overlapping reconstruction were equal to those with overlapping reconstruction and were fewer than those on 1- or 2-mm collimation (p < 0.01, Mann-Whitney U test). CONCLUSION: The image quality of coronal multiplanar reconstructions from isotropic voxel data obtained using 0.5-mm collimation, with or without overlapping reconstruction, is similar to that of direct coronal thin-section CT scans.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Reconstruction of the 12-lead electrocardiogram from reduced lead sets.

In clinical practice, continuous recording of all leads of the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is often not possible. We wanted to assess how well absent, noisy, or defective leads can be reconstructed from different lead subsets and how well lead reconstruction performs over time. A data set of 234 24-hour ECG recordings was divided into an equally sized training and test set. Precordial leads were systematically removed, and for all lead subsets including both limb leads and at least one precordial lead, the absent leads were reconstructed using general and patient-specific reconstruction templates. Reconstruction performance was measured by correlation between the original and reconstructed leads over the QRS and T waves, by average and maximum absolute ST differences, and by agreement when a clinical decision rule was applied. Reconstruction performance over time was evaluated at baseline, at 20 minutes, and 1, 6, 12 and 24 hours after the start of each recording. Reconstruction accuracy was high (correlation > or =0.932, average ST difference < or =30 microV, agreement > or =94.9%) with general reconstruction for lead sets with 1 or 2 precordial leads removed but was less satisfactory when more leads were missing. Patient-specific reconstruction performed well when up to 4 precordial leads were removed (correlation > or =0.967, average ST difference < or =26 microV, agreement > or =95.7%). Patient-specific reconstruction performance initially slightly decreased and then stabilized over time but remained much better than general reconstruction after 24 hours. Accurate reconstruction of the 12-lead ECG from lead subsets is possible over time. General reconstruction allows reconstruction of 1 or 2 precordial leads, whereas up to 4 leads can be reconstructed well using patient-specific reconstruction.

Angina, Unstable↗
PubMed2004

[Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: biomechanical comparison on cadaver specimens using a single or double hamstring technique].

PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We worked with cadaver specimens to evaluate control of anterior knee laxity after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) comparing double two-strand anterolateral and posteromedial reconstruction with the classical four-strand technique. We hypothesized that the double reconstruction would provide better control of anterior laxity in both flexion and extension. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixteen cadaver knees were randomly assigned to reconstruction technique. Anterior tibial translation was measured with an arthrometer (Rolimeter) at maximal manual tension at 20 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees flexion on the intact knee, after section of the ACL and after arthroscopic reconstruction using either the classical four-strand hamstring technique or a double two-strand anteromedial and posterolateral technique. An EndoButtonCL was used for the femoral fixation and a interference screw with staples for the tibial fixation. Variation in the length of each construct was measured between 0 degrees and 90 degrees flexion. RESULTS: In the single reconstruction group, the length of the graft varied by 0.5 +/- 0.7 mm between 0 degrees and 90 degrees flexion. In the double reconstruction group, the length varied by 0.5 +/- 0.9 mm for the anteromedial construct and 3.4 +/- 0.5 mm for the posterolateral construct. When studied with an intact ACL, anterior laxity of the 16 knees was 3.2 +/- 1.1, 3.5 +/- 1.5 and 2.6 +/- 1.1 mm at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees respectively. After section of the ACL, laxity increased significantly at all angles: 9.4 +/- 3.3, 6.1 +/- 2.5 and 6.8 +/- 2.9 at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees respectively. After classical four-strand single graft reconstruction, the residual anterior laxity was 3.7 +/- 0.9, 3.1 +/- 1.1, and 2.3 +/- 1.6 mm at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion. Statistical analysis using parametric or non-parametric tests as appropriate showed a significant difference in laxity at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees of flexion between knees with a cut ACL and knees with reconstructed ACL. At 20 degrees flexion, residual laxity was greater after single-construct reconstruction. At 60 degrees and 90 degrees there was no significant difference in anterior translation of the tibia in knees with intact or reconstructed ACL. After reconstruction with the dual-construct technique, laxity was 3.4 +/- 1.3, 2.6 +/- 1.5, and 2.4 +/- 1.2 mm at 20 degrees, 60 degrees and 90 degrees flexion respectively. Laxity was significantly greater with a cut ACL than after reconstruction at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion, but there was no significant difference in anterior translation of the tibia at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion between knees with an intact and a reconstructed ACL. DISCUSSION: These results based on a clinical evaluation measuring anterior translation of the tibia with an arthrometer are in agreement with results in the literature using robots. Compared with the classical technique, reconstruction of the ACL with a dual-construct technique provides a statistically significant improvement in control of anterior tibial translation at 20 degrees of flexion. The advantage of the dual anteromedial and posteriolateral construct technique is thus not found in the control of anterior laxity but rather in control of rotation laxity. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction of the ACL with a two-bundle graft technique provides control of anterior laxity at 20 degrees, 60 degrees, and 90 degrees flexion similar to that observed in knees with an intact ACL while the single construct technique re-establishes physiological laxity at 60 degrees and 90 degrees only. This improved control of anterior laxity with the two-bundle reconstruction is a small improvement regarding anterior laxity, the more potential advantage concerning rotational stability.

Aged↗
PubMed2000

Cost-based comparison between perforator flaps and TRAM flaps for breast reconstruction.

More women than ever before are undergoing mastectomies secondary to increased awareness and screening. This increase has also caused a corresponding increase in the number of breast reconstructions requested each year. The increased demand for reconstruction has fueled recent advances in new techniques. Aside from foreign-body reconstruction such as implants, the methods now being used are related to autogenous donations and reconstruction. Transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flaps and perforator flaps are currently being used for autogenous breast reconstruction. This study will compare these two techniques on the basis of cost and length of stay. A retrospective study of 49 patients undergoing a total of 64 perforator flap breast reconstructions at Memorial Medical Center in New Orleans, Louisiana, during the 1997 calendar year was used. There were 59 deep inferior epigastric perforator and five gluteal artery perforator breast reconstructions. All patients underwent some form of breast reconstruction and differed only in respect to whether a mastectomy was performed and whether the reconstruction was unilateral or bilateral. Those patients who underwent a mastectomy with immediate perforator flap reconstruction (n = 26) were then compared with patients undergoing mastectomy with immediate TRAM flap reconstruction (n = 154) at the University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center. The data from the Anderson Study were obtained from material published in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in 1996. Comparison of patients was limited to those who underwent mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction because this was the design of the M. D. Anderson study. This approach allowed a cost and length of stay comparison while keeping other variables relatively similar. Patients in the perforator flap series enjoyed a marginally shorter operating time and a much shorter length of stay. On average, the operative time for all perforator flap reconstructions was approximately 2 hours shorter than for all TRAM flaps. As for length of stay, perforator flap patients were discharged, on average, 3 days after the initial reconstruction. In contrast, TRAM flap patients remained in the hospital for an average of approximately 7 days after the initial reconstruction. The overall total, average cost for the perforator flap reconstruction in this study is $9625, whereas the average cost of all TRAM flaps performed in the Anderson study is $18,070.

Costs and Cost Analysis↗
PubMed2001

Auricular reconstruction: indications for autogenous and prosthetic techniques.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the alternatives for auricular reconstruction. 2. Discuss the pros and cons of autogenous reconstruction of total or subtotal auricular defects. 3. Enumerate the indications for prosthetic reconstruction of total or subtotal auricular defects. 4. Understand the complexity of and the expertise required for prosthetic reconstruction of auricular defects. The indications for autogenous auricular reconstruction versus prosthetic reconstruction with osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses were outlined in Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery in 1994 by Wilkes et al. of Canada, but because of the relatively recent Food and Drug Administration approval (1995) of extraoral osseointegrated implants, these indications had not been examined by a surgical unit in the United States. The purpose of this article is to present an evolving algorithm based on an experience with 98 patients who underwent auricular reconstruction over a 10-year period. From this experience, the authors conclude that autogenous reconstruction is the procedure of choice in the majority of pediatric patients with microtia. Prosthetic reconstruction of the auricle is considered in such pediatric patients with congenital deformities for the following three relative indications: (1) failed autogenous reconstruction, (2) severe soft-tissue/skeletal hypoplasia, and/or (3) a low or unfavorable hairline. A fourth, and in our opinion the ideal, indication for prosthetic ear reconstruction is the acquired total or subtotal auricular defect, most often traumatic or ablative in origin, which is usually encountered in adults. Although prosthetic reconstruction requires surgical techniques that are less demanding than autogenous reconstruction, construction of the prosthesis is a time-consuming task requiring experience and expertise. Although autogenous reconstruction presents a technical challenge to the surgeon, it is the prosthetic reconstruction that requires lifelong attention and may be associated with late complications. This article reports the first American series of auricular reconstruction containing both autogenous and prosthetic methods by a single surgical team.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

The effect of ethnicity on immediate reconstruction rates after mastectomy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Multiple factors may influence whether patients undergo immediate breast reconstruction along with mastectomy for breast cancer. The authors investigated whether ethnicity was an independent predictor of immediate breast reconstruction. METHODS: The authors identified 1004 patients who underwent mastectomy for breast cancer during the period 2001-2002. The rates of immediate reconstruction among different ethnicities were evaluated using the chi-square test. Logistic regression was used to adjust for covariates, including age and disease stage. Medical records were analyzed to identify factors that influenced each patient's decision for or against immediate breast reconstruction. RESULTS: Three hundred seventy-six women (37.5%) underwent immediate breast reconstruction: This included 20.2% of African-American women, compared with 40.0% of white women, 42.0% of Hispanic women, 42.2% of Asian women, and 10.0% of Middle Eastern women (P < 0.001). The unadjusted odds ratio (OR) for immediate reconstruction for African-Americans versus whites was 0.38 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.23-0.63; P < 0.001). After multivariate analysis, this disparity persisted, with an adjusted OR of 0.34 (95% CI, 0.18-0.62; P = 0.001). Asian women had lower rates of immediate reconstruction compared with white women (adjusted OR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.24-1.04; P = 0.06). Hispanic women did not have immediate reconstruction rates that differed significantly from white women. Middle Eastern women had lower rates of immediate reconstruction compared with white women (adjusted OR, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.02-0.38; P = 0.002), but they had a corresponding increase in the rate of delayed reconstruction. In a stepwise analysis of the decision pathway to immediate reconstruction, it was found that African-American women were less likely to be offered referrals for reconstruction, were less likely to accept offered referrals, were less likely to be offered reconstruction, and were less likely to elect reconstruction if it was offered. CONCLUSIONS: African-American women underwent immediate breast reconstruction at significantly lower rates compared with white women, Hispanic women, and Asian women. After adjusting for covariates, including age and disease stage, African-American women and Asian women had lower rates of reconstruction compared with white women. The factors that contribute to these differences warrant further study.

Black or African American↗
PubMed1999

Mandibular reconstruction using bone morphogenetic protein 2: long-term follow-up in a canine model.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of bone resorption and stability of 3-cm, full-thickness canine mandibular defects reconstructed with recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2) and a bioerodible particle carrier followed for 30 months after reconstruction. STUDY DESIGN: Nine dogs, divided into three groups, underwent reconstruction of surgically created 3-cm, full-thickness defects of the body of the mandible. METHODS: Mandibular reconstruction was performed via a combined intraoral and extraoral approach. Using standard plating techniques, a unilateral full-thickness, 3-cm defect was created in the body of the mandible. After stabilizing the defects with titanium reconstruction plates, test implants composed of rhBMP-2 and poly(lactide-co-glycolide) bioerodible particles were placed in the mandibular defects of six animals. Reconstruction plates were removed from test animals at 10 weeks. Three short-term test animals were sacrificed 3 months after reconstruction. Three long-term test animals were sacrificed 30 months after reconstruction to determine the degree of resorption and long-term stability of the rhBMP-2-induced bone. Control implants (carrier without rhBMP-2) were used in three animals and were sacrificed at 3 months. At 9 months, long-term animals were advanced to a solid diet. Masticatory function and body weight were monitored periodically to assess diet tolerance. Roentgenographic photodensitometry was performed on serial dental roentgenograms of the reconstructed segments to determine bone density and the degree of bone resorption over 30 months. After sacrifice, reconstructed segments were harvested and embedded in plastic for histological analysis and histomorphometry to determine the percentage of the defect replaced by mineralized bone (area density) and degree of resorption from 3 to 30 months after reconstruction. The main outcome measures were bone density and bone height determined from serial roentgenograms and percentage of the reconstructed segment replaced by mineralized bone (area density) determined from histomorphometry. RESULTS: Control animals without rhBMP-2 showed no evidence of bone formation across the defect. Histological examination revealed good bone formation in two of three of the short-term test animals with a mean area density of 41.0%. The long-term test animals treated with rhBMP-2 demonstrated good bone formation that was comparable to that of normal host bone by 3 months. The roentgenographic photodensity measurements stabilized at 5 months without evidence of persistent bone resorption. The height of the reconstructed segment (rhBMP-2-induced bone) initially decreased, then stabilized by 11 months after reconstruction with no indication of resorption or failure. Histological examination of the long-term test animals revealed good bone formation across the mandibular defects. However, there were localized areas of thinning of the cortical bone as compared with the short-term test animals sacrificed at 3 months. Histological examination verified the loss of height of the bone in the reconstructed segments. The area density (mean) of the long-term test animals was 56.5%. Despite the decrease in height of the induced bone, there was an increase in area density of the bone over time. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that rhBMP-2 in a bioerodible particle carrier induced new host bone formation across critical-size mandibular defects. The newly formed bone successfully integrated with existing host bone creating a stable union capable of withstanding the forces of masticatory function in a canine. There was some evidence of early bone resorption (thinning of the cortical bone and decrease in height) in the rhBMP-2-induced bone. The rhBMP-2-induced bone stabilized by 11 months after reconstruction and no further resorption was noted. The percentage of area of the defect replaced by rhBMP-2-induced bone (area density) increased over 30 months. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

Animals↗
PubMed2000

Nasal reconstruction based on aesthetic subunits in Orientals.

Reconstruction based on the aesthetic subunit principle has yielded good aesthetic outcomes in patients with moderate to severe nasal defects caused by trauma or tumor resection. However, the topographic subunits previously proposed are often unsuitable for Orientals. Compared with the nose in white patients, the nose in Orientals is low, lacks nasal muscle, and has a flat glabella; the structural features of the underlying cartilage and bone are not distinctly reflected in outward appearance. The authors devised aesthetic subunits suitable for Orientals, and they used these units to reconstruct various parts of the nose. The major difference between these units and those presented previously is the lack of soft triangles and the addition of the glabella as an independent unit. The authors divided the nose into the following five topographic units: the glabella, the nasal dorsum, the nasal tip, and the two alae. The border of the nasal dorsum unit was extended to above the maxillonasal suture. The basic reconstruction techniques use a V-Y advancement flap from the forehead to reconstruct the glabella, an island flap from the forehead to reconstruct the nasal dorsum and nasal tip, a nasolabial flap to reconstruct an ala, and a malar flap to reconstruct the cheek. A combination of flaps was used when the defect involved more than one unit. This concept was used for nasal reconstruction in 24 patients. In one patient undergoing reconstruction of the nasal dorsum and in one undergoing reconstruction of the nasal tip, the texture of the forearm flap did not match well, which resulted in a slightly unsatisfactory aesthetic outcome. In one patient in whom the glabella, nasal dorsum, and part of the cheek were reconstructed simultaneously, a web was formed at the medial ocular angle, and a secondary operation was subsequently performed using Z-plasty. In one patient undergoing reconstruction with a forehead flap, defatting was required to reduce the bulk of the subcutaneous flap pedicle at the glabella. However, suture lines were placed in the most inconspicuous sites in all patients, and the use of a trapdoor contraction emphasized the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. The use of these aesthetic subunits for reconstruction offers several advantages, particularly in Oriental patients. Because the nasal dorsum is reconstructed together with the side walls, tenting of the nasal dorsum is avoided, which prevents a flat appearance of the nose. A forehead flap is useful in the repair of complex defects. Defects of the alae should be separately reconstructed with a nasolabial flap to enhance the effect of the trapdoor contraction and to highlight the three-dimensional appearance of the nose. Candidates for reconstruction should be selected on the basis of nasal structure. The results suggest that these units can also be used in some white patients.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Breast reconstruction in older women: advantages of autogenous tissue.

As the population ages, the treatment of breast cancer among elderly women is becoming increasingly common. Decisions with regard to breast reconstruction require not only consideration of patient age and comorbidities but also a need to balance life expectancy with quality of life. Although it is often assumed that implant-based breast reconstruction is the least disruptive method, especially among patients who may be facing limited survival times, it was hypothesized that autogenous tissue breast reconstruction is a well-tolerated and perhaps preferable means of reconstruction for older women who choose to undergo reconstruction following mastectomy. No large series of autogenous tissue reconstructions in this age group has been presented. A retrospective study of 84 postmastectomy reconstructions (66 unilateral and 18 bilateral; 78.6 percent immediate) performed at the authors' institution for 81 women 65 years of age or older, between April of 1987 and December of 2000, was undertaken. Reconstructions were implant-based ( = 26), latissimus dorsi flap-based ( = 24), or transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap-based ( = 34). Of the 34 TRAM flaps, 21 were free or supercharged. Breast complications were more frequent ( < 0.05) among recipients of implant-based reconstructions (76.9 percent) than among recipients of latissimus dorsi flap (41.7 percent) or TRAM flap (35.3 percent) reconstructions. In multivariate logistic regression analyses, comorbidities, smoking, radiotherapy, and body mass index had no effect. Medical complications without long-term sequelae were observed for two patients who underwent latissimus dorsi flap reconstructions and two patients who underwent free TRAM flap reconstructions; the difference in the rates of medical complications was not significant. At the mean follow-up time of 4.2 years, 92.8 percent of all study patients exhibited no evidence of disease. Notably, despite being free of disease, seven of the 26 patients (27 percent) who underwent implant-based reconstructions abandoned further reconstructive efforts after complications necessitated implant removal. It was concluded that age alone should not determine the type of breast reconstruction and that autogenous tissue breast reconstruction can be a safe successful alternative for women 65 years of age or older.

Age Factors↗
PubMed2004

Factors that influence the completion of breast reconstruction.

Post mastectomy breast reconstruction continues to evolve in both timing and technique; however, multiple surgical procedures are usually required. The purpose of this report was to determine the number of secondary procedures required to complete the breast reconstruction and factors that influence this process. All patients who underwent breast reconstruction at Emory University Hospital between 1975 and 2000 were reviewed. The end point and inclusion criterion was completion to nipple reconstruction. Secondary procedures were determined per patient for either unilateral or bilateral reconstructions, and defined as any surgical manipulation of the reconstructed breast, contralateral breast, or donor site. The cohort was stratified by timing and method of reconstruction. Additional variables included risk factors, radiation therapy, and complications. A total of 888 patients completed the reconstructive process (738 unilateral and 150 bilateral). The average number of secondary procedures was 3.99 for unilateral, and 5.54 for bilateral. Delayed reconstructions had a higher number of secondary procedures in both groups. Transverse rectus abdominus musculocutaneous flap reconstruction tended to have more secondary procedures than implant or latissimus dorsi with or without implant reconstructions. Radiation therapy increased the number of secondary procedures in unilateral (3.9 versus 4.6, P < 0.001) and in bilateral reconstructions (5.7 versus 6.4, P = 0.032). The number of secondary procedures also increased exponentially with the number of risk factors (0-4), and patients with any complication had a higher number of secondary procedures for unilateral (4.5 versus 3.6, P < 0.001) and bilateral reconstructions (6.4 versus 4.5, P < 0.001). Secondary breast and donor site procedures were used as an outcome measure to formulate comparisons. Autologous tissue reconstruction required more secondary procedures, likely in part to donor site revisions. Delayed reconstruction, the need for radiation therapy, any complication, and more risk factors significantly increased the number of secondary procedures required to complete the reconstructive process.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Qualitative assessment of breast reconstruction in a specialist breast unit.

BACKGROUND: Breast reconstruction is an integral part of the surgical management of women with breast cancer. It is often performed by plastic surgeons but, in some centres, it is performed by breast surgeons trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic surgery. We evaluated the objective and subjective outcomes of reconstruction for breast cancer at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Breast Unit (Adelaide, Australia) between 1990 and June 2002. METHODS: A chart analysis was conducted of all patients who underwent breast cancer reconstruction at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Breast Unit with analysis of type of reconstruction and complications. Patients were interviewed and self-assessment quality of life questionnaires (FACT-B, body image), and overall satisfaction with reconstruction using an analogue scale were performed. Three observers carried out photographic analysis of the reconstructions. A comparison was then made between the different forms of reconstruction used. RESULTS: One hundred and ninety-two patients underwent a total of 219 breast reconstructions during this period. The reconstructions included 18 latissimus dorsi mini flaps, 83 tissue expander/implants, 43 latissimus dorsi flaps and 75 TRAM flaps. There were no perioperative deaths. Significant systemic complications occurred in four patients (2%). Significant implant related complications occurred in four patients (3.2% of patients with implants). Total flap loss occurred in four patients (2.9% of flaps). One hundred and twenty-three patients were able to be contacted and completed the questionnaires. Overall 77% of patients were highly satisfied with breast reconstruction and 82% scored a satisfactory result on photographic analysis. All four forms of reconstruction rated highly with respect to quality of life, body image, patient satisfaction and photographic assessment. CONCLUSIONS: Breast reconstruction undertaken by breast surgeons trained in breast reconstruction and oncoplastic techniques has been performed with an acceptable rate of complications and a high level of patient satisfaction. Satisfaction with breast reconstruction was similar across the four methods of reconstruction used.

Adult↗