PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Tooth Fractures”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 325 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

Oral findings in glassblowers.

Oral changes related to the occupation of glassblowing have been examined in 74 Danish glassblowers, consisting of 44 active glassblowers (Group 1) and 30 past glassblowers (Group 2). In addition, 15 non-glassblowers (Group 3) were examined. All three groups worked in the same department of mouth-blown glassware in Holmegaard's Glassworks. White patches of the buccal mucosa occurred in 23% of active glassblowers, but did not occur among past or non-glassblowers. Histologically, the white lesions revealed morsicatio buccarum-like changes. The lesions are reversible and should be distinguished from leukoplakias. The term "glassblower's white patch" is suggested. Furthermore black discolorations of vermillion border and front teeth occured in 30% and 62%, respectively, of active glassblowers. Tooth fractures, mostly enamel fractures, caused by the blowpipe were found in 43% of active glassblowers and 19% of past glassblowers.

Adult↗

The dentin-enamel junction and the fracture of human teeth.

The dentin-enamel junction (DEJ), which is the interfacial region between the dentin and outer enamel coating in teeth, is known for its unique biomechanical properties that provide a crack-arrest barrier for flaws formed in the brittle enamel1. In this work, we re-examine how cracks propagate in the proximity of the DEJ, and specifically quantify, using interfacial fracture mechanics, the fracture toughness of the DEJ region. Careful observation of crack penetration through the interface and the new estimate of the DEJ toughness ( approximately 5 to 10 times higher than enamel but approximately 75% lower than dentin) shed new light on the mechanism of crack arrest. We conclude that the critical role of this region, in preventing cracks formed in enamel from traversing the interface and causing catastrophic tooth fractures, is not associated with the crack-arrest capabilities of the interface itself; rather, cracks tend to penetrate the (optical) DEJ and arrest when they enter the tougher mantle dentin adjacent to the interface due to the development of crack-tip shielding from uncracked-ligament bridging.

Dental Enamel↗

Fracture strength of tooth roots following canal preparation by hand and rotary instrumentation.

The study aimed to determine fracture loads in tooth roots after canal preparation using different techniques. Mesiobuccal roots of 39 extracted mandibular molars were used. Three groups each of 13 roots were prepared by stainless steel hand files (K-files), and two rotary nickel-titanium techniques (Lightspeed and Greater Taper files). After obturation, a vertical load was applied by means of a spreader inserted into the canal until fracture occurred. The mean fracture load was 10.2 +/- 4.4 kg for K-files, 15.7 +/- 9.1 kg for Lightspeed and 13.2 +/- 6.1 kg for Greater Taper files, but differences were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). Most fracture lines were incomplete fractures on the buccal surface, followed by proximal and compound fractures. Greater apical enlargement (Lightspeed) or increased canal taper (Greater Taper files) did not increase fracture susceptibility of tooth roots.

Analysis of Variance↗

An audit on the placement and replacement of restorations in a general dental practice.

OBJECTIVES: To determine the reasons for placing and replacing restorations in a general dental practice amongst a group of patients. METHODS: This study used the method devised by Mjör and later modified by Burke and others. Instruction and data collection sheets were sent out to general dental practitioners (GDPs) for participation in a multicentre study. The GDPs were asked to record consecutively all restorations placed over a period of one month. The author is presenting his data collected over a period of six months using the same methodology. The author's results will be compared with a VDP study and the multicentre study. RESULTS: 779 restorations were placed during the six months of the study. Three hundred and sixty-four (47%) were initial placements and 415 (53%) replacements. Primary fractured teeth totalled (16%) of the restorations. Other reasons for restoration placement were marginal fracture/degradation (31%), non-carious defects (13%) and both primary and secondary caries (9%). The proportion of glass-ionomer restorations increased with the age of the patient compared with amalgam and composites (chi-square: p < 0.001), averaging 64% in age groups between 35 and 75 years, increasing to 88% in those patients over 75 years. CONCLUSIONS: The principal reasons for placement and replacement of restorations in this study were repairs to tooth fractures. The proportion of amalgams and composites decreased with age while the proportion of glass ionomers increased.

Adolescent↗

[Tooth and jaw injuries following violence--diagnosis and treatment in emergency department].

Research over the last decade has confirmed that facial injuries caused by violence occur most frequently among young males, often under the influence of alcohol, and less frequently in women and children following domestic violence. Evidence of injuries may be used in court or in claims for compensation, and must be carefully documented. Facial asymmetry, deviation of the mandible in opening, altered occlusion and/or abrasions under the chin may be indications of jaw fractures; such patients are referred to oral surgery units for further treatment. Lacerations and ulceration in the oral mucous membrane should be treated as skin wounds. A fractured tooth should be referred to a general dental practitioner. Luxated teeth should be carefully replaced and immediately referred to a dentist for fixation. Completely avulsed teeth should immediately be replaced, preferably at the site of the accident, or immediately upon arrival at the clinic. Prompt referral to a dental practitioner for follow-up treatment is essential for the success of replantations. Additional documentation of the injury may be provided by photographs, radiographs and drawings. The letter of referral to the dentist should contain the following information: data on the patient, the circumstances, clinical findings, treatment performed and prescriptions given, together with advice given to the patient.

Adult↗

Xeroradiography in root fracture diagnosis.

Root fracture is a clinical problem that often is difficult to diagnose. The purpose of this study was to compare diagnostic value of conventional radiographic and xeroradiographic images of experimentally fractured teeth. Forty-five extracted human single-rooted teeth were used. The roots of the teeth were coated with wax to simulate periodontal ligament and invested in acrylic to the cementoenamel junction. An access cavity was prepared and para-post, size 4 to 12 mm, was placed into the root canal. Each tooth with post was placed on the load cell table of an Instron testing machine. The Instron continuously recorded load on a moving graph paper. The load was increased until the tooth fractured. Determination of fracture was made by the sound of a sharp "crack" and by a sudden release of load on the post, as seen on the Instron recording graph. After fracture, conventional radiograph and xeroradiograph were obtained for each tooth by use of the paralleling technique. The x-ray beam angle, film distance, and tooth placement were held constant in both techniques by use of a Rinn instrument. All films were evaluated by use of light from a masked viewbox, while all of the xeroradiographs were viewed in reflected light. A magnifying glass was used to aid in the examination process. The samples were examined and categorized for root fracture by the examiners with the use of the following scores: 0 = unacceptably poor, 1 = poor but diagnostic, 2 = adequate for diagnostic information, and 3 = optimal for diagnostic information.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Dental Stress Analysis↗

Post and core fabrication beneath an existing crown.

A technique has been described for constructing a post and core for a tooth fractured prior to insertion of a fixed partial denture. In selected patients, this method of repair offers an acceptable alternative to a more costly and time-consuming refabrication of a fixed prosthesis.

Crowns↗

Multifactorial analysis of an MOD restored human premolar using auto-mesh finite element approach.

The use of an mesial-occlusal-distal (MOD) restoration in repairing a large carious lesion depends on many factors. Biomechanical performance is one of the most important. It has been recognized that resistance to restoration failure is not solely a biological concern (e.g. toxicity), but that the cavity shape, dimensions, and the state of stress must all be taken into account. In the present study, a newly developed auto-mesh program was used to generate 30 three-dimensional (3D) finite element (FE) models simulating the biomechanics for multiple factorial design of the MOD gold restoration in a maxillary second premolar. Stress levels were related to individual design factors (e.g. pulpal wall depth [P], isthmus width [W] and interaxial thickness [T]) and to their interactions under the worst physiological scenario: a concentrated bite force acting on lingual cusp with debonded interfaces between cavity walls and restorations. The results showed that enlarging the volume of the MOD cavity significantly increased stresses in enamel but did not intentionally affect stresses in dentin. The alternation of individual design parameters significantly changed the peak stresses (P < 0.05). For all three parameters, except for the width, the peak stress increased as the cavity dimension increased. Stress elevation rate (termed as 'volumetric stress rate'--stress elevation by increasing one unit volume of the restored materials) was different among three design factors. Depth was the most critical factor governing the stress elevation in enamel (1.76 MPa mm(-3)) while length (interaxial thickness) was the most important parameter in dentin (0.49 MPa mm(-3)). Width was the least compromising factor to the remaining tooth, 0.32 MPa mm(-3) for enamel and -0.23 MPa mm(-3) for dentin. The findings, at its core, did not fully agree with the traditional concept that the preservation of tooth substances will reduce risk of tooth fracture. This study leaves open possibility for the structural optimization of the MOD restoration.

Bicuspid↗

Restoration of anterior teeth with indirect composite partial coverage crowns: a clinical report.

When an esthetic restoration with minimal tooth reduction is desired, for example in patients with uncomplicated tooth fractures, composite partial coverage crowns may be a therapeutic option. The indirect composite restoration allows restoration of the original tooth anatomy, function, and esthetics to be reproduced while preserving tooth structure. The use of composite partial coverage crowns to restore fractured anterior teeth is described.

Adolescent↗

An investigation into the practice of tongue piercing in the South West of England.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence and range of complications following tongue piercing. METHODS: A survey of individuals with tongue piercings ('piercees') and tongue piercers was undertaken in the South West of England. One hundred and twenty-three piercees completed a self-administered questionnaire and 22 piercers took part in an interviewer-led questionnaire. RESULTS: The mean age of an individual having a tongue piercing was 19 years old. Almost all the subjects reported problems following piercing; early problems were mainly due to tissue trauma, whereas later, ingestion of jewellery and tooth fracture were common events. A minority (7%) of piercees required the advice of a healthcare professional following tongue piercing. The majority of piercers reported adequate cross-infection measures and enquired about their clients' health prior to piercing. However, only one piercer was aware of the risk of bacterial endocarditis following tongue piercing. Most of the piercers reported that they would advise their clients to attend an Accident and Emergency department if a serious complication ensued. CONCLUSION: Tongue piercing may be associated with significant short-term and long-term morbidity, including tooth damage. Although the majority of piercers interviewed reported adequate cross-infection controls, knowledge of the medical risks associated with tongue piercing varied widely.

Adolescent↗

Oral and dental complications of intra-oral piercing.

The present study assessed the prevalence of oral piercing among young adults and revealed the types and rate of complications following oral piecing, as well as the awareness of the complications. The study included 400 consecutive patients, who randomly arrived at a military dental office. Before dental examination, patients were requested to fill out a questionnaire regarding oral piercing, their awareness of its complications, and the occurrence of complications related to piercing. Intra-oral examination included special attention to piercing-related complications, such as tooth fractures, gingivitis, bleeding, infections, gingival recessions, etc. A total of 389 patients, 210 (54%) males and 179 (46%) females agreed to participate (97.3% response rate), with an average age of 20.08 +/- 1.1 years. Of the participants, 79 (20.3%) reported having at least one type of oral piercing; lingual piercing was the most common. Swelling and bleeding after piercing were reported by 41 (51.9%) and 36 (45.7%) participants, respectively. Among the participants, 225 (57.8%) were unaware of the dangers of intra-oral piercing. Clinical examination revealed 15 fractured teeth in 11 (13.9%) participants with piercing. Gingival recessions were observed in 21 (26.6%), mostly in the mandibular incisor area. Dentists should be aware of the increasing number of patients with pierced intra- and peri-oral sites and to provide appropriate guidance to patients who contemplate body piercing involving oral sites.

Adolescent↗

Reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan.

AIMS: To record the reasons for placement and replacement of amalgam restorations in Jordan, to determine the use of amalgam restorations in common cavity types and to collect data on the age of the replaced amalgam restorations. SUBJECTS AND SETTING: Dentists in Jordan (n=241). METHOD: Cross-sectional study using postal survey backed up with personal contact. Data was recorded for all restorations placed or replaced over a period of one month. RESULTS: Information was collected on 3,166 restorations from patients aged 9 to 66 years. Of all restorations, 54.8% were first time placements while 45.2% were replacements of old restorations. The major reason for the first time restorations was primary caries, while that for replacement was secondary caries (28.5%) followed by broken and lost restorations (20.4%), root canal therapy (17%), tooth fracture (12%), pain or sensitivity (8.8%), poor margins (8.5%). CONCLUSIONS: In Jordan, the main reason for first placement of amalgam restoration is primary caries, the main reason for replacement is secondary caries.

Adolescent↗

A comparison of the mechanical behavior of posterior teeth with amalgam and composite MOD restorations.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mechanical behavior, and infer differences in fracture resistance, of mandibular molars with amalgam and composite MOD restorations to that of an unrestored molar. METHOD: Finite element models were developed for an unrestored molar and molars with MOD amalgam and composite restorations. The location and magnitude of maximum principal stress resulting from simultaneous mechanical and thermal loads were determined for each molar using a series of designed experiments. An analysis of variance was conducted with the components of stress to distinguish the relative influence of oral parameters and restoration on the stress distribution in each molar. RESULTS: The maximum principal stress in the unrestored molar was the largest of all three molars examined and occurred within the dentin along the pulpal wall. Maximum principal stresses in the molars with amalgam and composite restorations both occurred along the cavosurface margin. Maximum principal stresses in the molar with amalgam restoration occurred at the pulpal floor and lingual wall junction and resulted from large occlusal loads. Although occlusal loading had minimal effects on the stress distribution within the molar with composite restoration, low oral temperatures were responsible for the maximum principal stresses, which were found at the lingual margin and occlusal surface junction. CONCLUSION: There was no significant difference in the magnitude of maximum stress that occurred in the molars with amalgam and light curing composite restorations. However, the location and orientation of maximum stress in the restored molars were largely dependent on the restorative material. Although clinical studies report that tooth fracture occurs predominately to restored molars, the unrestored molar experienced the highest stress in this investigation. Therefore, the reduction in fracture resistance of restored posterior teeth appears to result from changes in the location of maximum stress resulting from mastication and temperature changes.

Analysis of Variance↗

Reasons for the placement and replacement of restorations in vocational training practices.

AIM: The reasons for placement and replacement of restorations are central to clinical practice. It is the purpose of this paper to assess the reasons for placement and replacement of restorations in the practices of vocational dental practitioners (VDPs) and their trainers. METHOD: VDPs and their trainers were invited to take part in the study. VDPs were asked to record the principal reason for the placement or replacement of all restorations which they provided for a one-month period and, also, to record the age, Class and materials used for each restoration replaced (if known). Trainers were also asked to participate. The data thereby collected were analysed statistically. RESULTS: 56 VDPs and 17 trainers participated. Data were obtained on a total of 9031 restorations, 4423 (49%) being initial placements and 4608 (51%) replacements. Of the total number of restorations assessed, 54% were amalgam, 30% composite and 16% glass ionomer. Principal reasons for placement/replacement of the restorations were primary caries (41%), secondary caries (22%), tooth fracture (6%), margin fracture/degradation (6%), non-carious defects (6%) and bulk fracture (5%). The type of existing restorative material was recorded for 4196 restorations: secondary caries was the most common reason for the replacement of restorations--for 46.0%, 39.6% and 39.8% of amalgam, composite and glass-ionomer restorations respectively. VDPs placed more restorations as a consequence of caries than their trainers. CONCLUSION: Primary caries is the most common reason for the placement of restorations by the participating dentists, and secondary caries is the most common reason for the replacement of restorations of amalgam, composite and glass ionomer. VDPs placed more restorations as a consequence of caries than their trainers.

Dental Caries↗

Longevity of extensive class II open-sandwich restorations with a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement.

Several new techniques have been introduced for use in the esthetic restoration of posterior cavities to substitute for the presumed toxicity of amalgam. Composite-laminated glass-ionomer cement restorations, the sandwich technique, have been recommended for caries-risk patients. Clinical evaluation of the use of conventional glass-ionomer cements in the open-sandwich restoration has shown a high failure rate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the durability and cariostatic effect of a modified open-sandwich restoration utilizing a resin-modified glass-ionomer cement (RMGIC) in large cavities. The materials consisted of 274 mostly extensive Class II Vitremer/Z100 restorations performed by four dentists in 168 adults. Six experimental groups were investigated. In four groups a thick and in two groups a thin layer of cement was placed. Cavity conditioning before application of the RMGIC self-etching primer was done in 3 groups with polyacrylic acid and in one group with maleic acid; in two groups, only water rinsing was performed. The restorations were evaluated at baseline and after 6, 12, 24, and 36 months according to modified USPHS criteria (van Dijken, 1986). After 3 years, 239 restorations were evaluated. Twelve (5%) were estimated as non-acceptable. Two were replaced, and seven were repaired with resin composite. Tooth fractures were observed in 2.5%. Slight erosion of the RMGIC part was seen in 4%, and in one case operative treatment was indicated. Post-operative sensitivity was reported for 9 teeth. Forty-three percent of the patients were considered as caries-risk patients. Only one restoration showed secondary caries. The three-year results indicated that the modified open-sandwich restoration is an appropriate alternative to amalgam including extensive restorations.

Acid Etching, Dental↗

Dental fracture fragment attachment: fracture model and luting agent comparisons.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was twofold: 1. To compare two different research models for simulating a traumatic anterior tooth fracture: the blunt trauma method (standard method) and an AL2O3 sectioning method (experimental method). 2. To compare the bond strength of tooth fragments bonded with resin modified glass ionomer vs. a light cured composite resin. METHODS: Two hundred bovine incisors were used in the study and kept in plain tap water throughout. The study consisted of five basic steps: 1. Fracture of the teeth by either blunt trauma (chisel and hammer) or AL2O3 sectioning disc. 2. Luting of the fractured fragments back to the teeth using either a composite resin or resin modified glass ionomer. 3. Thermocycling of the repaired teeth. 4. Dislodging the teeth to determine the strength of repair. 5. Determination of fracture type. RESULTS: One-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference in the forces required to fracture the resin modified glass ionomer and composite resin regardless of whether the teeth were originally fractured with the blunt force method (p=0.030) or the disc sectioning method (p=.001). One-way ANOVA also revealed a statistically significant difference between the forces required for fracture by blunt trauma and the disc fracture techniques with the resin modified glass ionomer group (p=0.000345). However, there was no significant difference when the two techniques were compared for the composite resin (p= 0.2941). CONCLUSIONS: 1. The resin modified glass ionomer was significantly stronger than the composite resin when both the blunt trauma and the disc fracture techniques were employed. 2. The study's results do not support substituting the ease of the AL2O3 disc for the more time-consuming blunt trauma method.

Analysis of Variance↗

[Oral problems in divers].

Divers can have several oral problems. Firstly, problems caused by pressure changes. These are barodontalgia and odontocrexis. Barodontalgia is toothache by barotrauma. Odontocrexis is restorations coming lose or breaking or tooth fractures by expansion of air beneath restorations. Other problems can occur by cements used to fix casted restorations, by inflammations in the orofacial region, and by not yet fully healed oral wounds. Secondly, there are problems related to the diver's mouthpiece. To keep the mouthpiece in place, the mandible has to be forced in a forward position. Holding this position often and for long periods of time, may develop or aggravate temporomandibular dysfunction. Insufficient fit of the mouthpiece may induce oral mucosal lesions. Therefore, it is recommended to produce individual diver mouthpieces. It is also recommended to produce individual diver mouthpieces for complete dentures wearing divers and for divers with fixed orthodontic appliances.

Barotrauma↗