SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “artificial intelligence (AI)”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

314 records · Page 18Linked to original sources

PubMed2026

Performance of AI-Based Screening Tools for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Across Apnea-Hypopnea Index Thresholds: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is highly prevalent but remains substantially underdiagnosed. Polysomnography (PSG) is the reference standard, but its cost and limited availability constrain large-scale case identification. AI-based screening tools may support risk stratification and referral prioritization, but their diagnostic accuracy across apnea-hypopnea index (AHI) thresholds remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to systematically evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of AI-based OSA screening tools at AHI thresholds of ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 events/hour, with emphasis on models using non-PSG-derived inputs. METHODS: PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were searched for studies published from January 1, 2016, to May 3, 2026. Eligible studies included adults evaluated for suspected OSA or recruited from population-based cohorts, assessed AI-based models intended or interpretable for OSA screening, risk prediction, or screening-oriented severity classification, used PSG as the reference standard, and reported sufficient data to construct or reconstruct 2×2 contingency tables. Diagnostic accuracy was synthesized separately by AHI threshold and input source using bivariate random-effects models, with 95% CIs and prediction intervals (PIs). Risk of bias and certainty of evidence were assessed using QUADAS-2 (Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2) and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation), respectively. RESULTS: A total of 60 studies were included, of which 47 contributed data to the meta-analysis. At AHI thresholds of ≥5, ≥15, and ≥30 events/hour, pooled sensitivities were 0.94 (95% CI 0.92-0.96; 95% PI 0.71-0.99), 0.87 (95% CI 0.84-0.89; 95% PI 0.66-0.96), and 0.83 (95% CI 0.79-0.87; 95% PI 0.61-0.94), respectively; the corresponding specificities were 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84; 95% PI 0.30-0.96), 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.85; 95% PI 0.39-0.96), and 0.91 (95% CI 0.87-0.94; 95% PI 0.55-0.99), respectively. The corresponding areas under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves were 0.943, 0.907, and 0.920. For non-PSG-derived tools, sensitivities were 0.92, 0.85, and 0.81, and specificities were 0.70, 0.74, and 0.85 at the 3 thresholds, respectively. For PSG-derived models, sensitivities were 0.96, 0.90, and 0.85, and specificities were 0.82, 0.88, and 0.96, respectively. Exploratory subgroup analyses suggested performance variation across selected study and model characteristics, including region, algorithmic framework, data source, and validation method. CONCLUSIONS: AI-based tools showed generally favorable screening performance for OSA across clinically relevant AHI thresholds, although wide PIs suggest variable performance across future comparable populations and settings. By synthesizing diagnostic accuracy across 3 AHI thresholds and distinguishing non-PSG-derived from PSG-derived models, this review extends previous broad or modality-specific reviews and offers a clinically interpretable, pathway-specific basis for linking model performance to intended use. The findings may clarify potential roles for non-PSG-derived tools in front-end screening and referral prioritization and for PSG-derived models in reduced-channel assessment and sleep-laboratory workflow support. Given substantial heterogeneity, limited external validation, and low or very low certainty of evidence, prospective validation is needed before routine implementation.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Listening forward: emerging roles of bioacoustics in ecology, evolution, and conservation.

Bioacoustics is increasingly shifting from a mostly descriptive pursuit to one that can anticipate ecological change. Recent innovations-from autonomous recording units and edge-computing sensors to speech-inspired feature extraction and machine-learning techniques like transfer learning, unsupervised discovery, and explainable AI-are transforming the study of animal communication. These advances let us work at scales previously difficult to imagine. Automated species recognition, individual identification, and even tracking cultural evolution over decades are now within reach. Entire ecosystem soundscapes can be mapped with unprecedented resolution. Looking ahead, global listening networks, adaptive acoustic indices, and live biodiversity dashboards seem increasingly realistic. We may soon build digital models that simulate communication networks under future scenarios. Closer integration with genomics, physiology, and robotics could link vocal traits to their genetic, physiological, and ecological drivers. Challenges remain, including data governance, acoustic privacy, and equitable access to the planet's sonic heritage. Bioacoustics may be on the way to becoming a predictive, integrative science - one particularly well suited to monitoring, interpreting, and helping safeguard life's communication systems in a rapidly changing world.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A criticality-based framework for task composition in multi-agent bioinformatics integration systems.

MOTIVATION: During task composition, such as can be found in distributed query processing, workflow systems and AI planning, decisions have to be made by the system and possibly by users with respect to how a given problem should be solved. Although there is often more than one correct way of solving a given problem, these multiple solutions do not necessarily lead to the same result. Some researchers are addressing this problem by providing data provenance information. Others use expert advice encoded in a supporting knowledge-base. In this paper, we propose an approach that assesses the importance of such decisions with respect to the overall result. We present a way of measuring decision criticality and describe its potential use. RESULTS: A multi-agent bioinformatics integration system is used as the basis of a framework that facilitates such functionality. We propose an agent architecture, and a concrete bioinformatics example (prototype) is used to show how certain decisions may not be critical in the context of more complex tasks.

Algorithms↗

PubMed2026

PepGen: conditional generation of peptides for MHC binding.

MOTIVATION: Peptide-MHC II binding drives adaptive immunity, yet discovery of novel binder peptides remains challenging due to open binding grooves of MHC-II that accommodate variable-length peptides. While discriminative models perform well, they are unfeasible for generation via enumeration due to vast peptide space (2013≈8×1016 for peptides of length 13 amino acids). Generative AI approaches could accelerate binder design to enable vaccines targeted to particular MHC-II alleles or optimize other peptide chemical properties. RESULTS: We introduce PepGen, the first protein language model for MHC II peptide generation building on Generalized Language Modeling. PepGen conditions on alleles, arbitrary partial peptides including putative TCR-interacting motifs, and continuous binding affinity. Across multiple benchmarks including infilling and de novo generation, PepGen outperformed frequency sampling, Gibbs clustering, and autoregressive baselines. Adjusted log-probabilities enable good classification performance. Experimental validation confirmed that the SARS-CoV-2 peptide TEGALNTPKDHIGTR binding the HLA-DQA101:03-DQB106:03 allele can be redesigned to bind the HLA-DQA101:02-DQB105:02 allele. PepGen generated three putative TCR-motif-preserving binders gaining up to 70% of original MFI. Overall, PepGen provides scalable, motif-constrained MHC II peptide redesign and de novo generation, validated through thorough benchmarks and functional assays. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code and Data are available at https://github.com/DaniTheOrange/PepGen.

Peptides↗

PubMed2026

Evaluation of a cornea-specialized large language model for diagnostic and management accuracy in complex corneal cases.

PURPOSE: To evaluate whether a cornea-specialized large language model (LLM) enhanced with retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) improves clinicians' diagnostic and management accuracy in complex corneal cases compared to a general-purpose GPT-4o model and unaided clinician performance. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, masked evaluation study involved three cornea trainees who each independently reviewed 39 real-world corneal cases under three experimental conditions: unaided, GPT-4o-assisted, and assisted by a cornea-specialized GPT-4o model. The cornea-specialized model was constructed by embedding over 200 publicly available Wikipedia articles into GPT-4o's RAG framework. Participants provided open-ended diagnoses and selected the next-step management options (multiple choice). They were allowed up to three GPT-4o queries per case, and the AI-assisted arms were randomized to minimize bias. Accuracy for both tasks was compared against expert reference standards using McNemar's test. RESULTS: Diagnostic accuracy was 48.7%, 20.5%, and 38.5% unaided, improving to 69.2%, 46.2%, and 59.0% with general GPT-4o (p<0.04). The cornea-specialized GPT-4o further improved accuracy to 71.8%, 48.7%, and 74.4%, with improvements over unaided performance for all clinicians (p<0.01). For next-step decisions, unaided accuracy was 76.9%, 87.2%, and 59.0%. With the specialized model, Ophthalmologist 3 improved to 71.8% (p<0.05), Ophthalmologist 1 remained high at 82.1%, and Ophthalmologist 2 declined to 64.1% (p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A cornea-specialized LLM enhanced with RAG improved diagnostic accuracy in complex corneal cases, particularly among clinicians with lower baseline performance. Effects on management accuracy were inconsistent. Future studies should explore the use of open-ended management tasks and examine whether smaller, curated retrieval corpora yield better model performance.

Humans↗

PubMed2026

Large-scale AI analysis reveals missed opportunities in albuminuria testing and disease-modifying therapy implementation.

AIMS: Albuminuria is a key diagnostic and prognostic biomarker of chronic kidney disease (CKD), associated with adverse cardiovascular and renal outcomes. Despite guideline recommendations, urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) testing is infrequently performed in cardiology. This study assessed the uptake of UACR testing, the estimated prevalence of undiagnosed albuminuria, and the use of disease-modifying therapies in patients with cardio-kidney-metabolic (CKM) disease. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of all adults seen at the cardiology department of a tertiary referral centre between 2019 and 2024. Data were extracted using CTcue, an AI-driven platform. Albuminuria was defined as UACR ≥30 mg/g. A weighted logistic regression model estimated albuminuria prevalence in untested patients. Among 77 351 patients (44.8% female, mean age 64.4 years), only 8.9% had a recorded UACR, of whom 46.4% had albuminuria. Testing rates were low across high-risk groups: 29.9% in diabetes, 21.7% in heart failure, and 13.7% in hypertension. In untested patients, the predicted prevalence of albuminuria was 36.6%, and highest in those with eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m2 (70.0%), heart failure (47.8%), or diabetes (46.8%). Use of disease-modifying therapies was low, even among patients with confirmed albuminuria. In patients with documented vs. predicted albuminuria, 43.0% vs. 39.1% received renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, 12.8% vs. 5.7% received SGLT2 inhibitors, and <1% in both groups received finerenone. CONCLUSION: Albuminuria is substantially underdetected in cardiology practice, possibly contributing to underuse of effective CKM therapies. Systematic UACR screening with structured treatment protocols may help close this gap and improve outcomes for patients with CKM disease.

Humans↗

PubMed1993

Physiological applications of consistency-based diagnosis.

This research attempts to span the gap between the AI in medicine (AIM) and consistency-based diagnosis (CBD) communities by applying CBD to physiology. The highly-regulated nature of physiological systems challenges standard CBD algorithms, which are not tailored for complex dynamic systems. Extensions of CBD to dynamic domains have relied upon complete quantitative dynamic simulation for behavior prediction. However, dynamic simulations, particularly by continuous systems, tend to inundate key CBD processes (such as truth maintenance and information-theoretic testing) with a deluge of temporal information. To combat this problem, we separate static from dynamic analysis so that CBD performs static diagnosis at a selected set of time slices. Knowledge of the qualitative behavior of physiological regulators is then used to link static intra-slice diagnoses into a complete dynamic account of the progression of a physiological condition. This provides a simpler approach to CBD of dynamic systems while adding a new capability to CBD: the detection of dynamic faults (i.e. those that do not necessarily persist throughout diagnosis). This paper describes (a) a few of the problems underlying CBD extensions to dynamic systems, (b) our hybrid static-dynamic, qualitative-quantitative approach, (c) our implemented IDUN system, (d) IDUN's diagnosis of volume-loading hypertension, (e) the generalization of IDUN's modeling perspective to the compartmental ontology, and (f) IDUN's use of compartmental models to diagnose acidosis.

Acidosis↗

PubMed2026

AI-Supported, Integrative Prediction of Postoperative Delirium: Protocol for the CONFUSED Study.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative delirium (POD) is a frequent and serious complication in older surgical patients, characterized by acute cognitive dysfunction and fluctuating levels of consciousness. POD is associated with prolonged hospitalization, long-term cognitive decline, reduced quality of life, and increased mortality. Despite its clinical relevance, the underlying pathophysiological mechanisms remain poorly understood, and reliable biomarkers for early prediction and prevention are lacking. OBJECTIVE: The CONFUSED study aims to identify molecular and clinical predictors of POD by integrating clinical data with proteomic, transcriptomic, and epigenetic analyses. The primary objective is to develop predictive models for POD using multimodal data. Secondary objectives include the identification of delirium-associated genes, proteins, and epigenetic signatures, as well as the exploration of patient subgroups at increased risk for POD. METHODS: CONFUSED is a prospective observational cohort study conducted at a German university hospital. Adult patients undergoing major surgery under general anesthesia will be enrolled until 100 cases of POD have been observed, which is expected to require a total sample size of approximately 200 to 300 patients. Blood samples are collected at 4 predefined time points: before premedication, immediately after surgery, and on postoperative days 2 and 5. Samples undergo comprehensive proteomic profiling, transcriptomic analysis using RNA microarrays, DNA methylation analysis, and genotyping of selected polymorphisms. Clinical data, including demographics, comorbidities, perioperative variables, medications, and delirium assessments using the Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) and CAM for the intensive care unit, are systematically recorded. Statistical analyses include univariate and multivariate methods, as well as machine learning approaches such as random forests and support vector machines, to identify relevant biomarkers and develop predictive models. The study protocol follows STROBE (Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) and TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) guidelines and was approved by the responsible ethics committees. RESULTS: The study was registered in the German Clinical Trials Register (DRKS00033854) on March 18, 2024. Recruitment started in January 2024 and is ongoing at the time of manuscript submission. As of now, 135 patients have been enrolled. Sample collection and laboratory analyses are ongoing. Data analysis began in January 2026, with first results anticipated in July 2026. Final data lock is anticipated after the completion of recruitment. CONCLUSIONS: By integrating multimodal molecular data with clinical parameters and applying advanced machine learning techniques, the CONFUSED study aims to improve the prediction and understanding of POD. The results are expected to support the development of personalized preventive strategies and contribute to improved perioperative care for patients at risk of POD.

Humans↗