SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Angiography”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

[Quantification of extracranial carotid stenosis. Magnetic resonance angiography and Doppler sonography versus intra-arterial angiography].

UNLABELLED: To assess various non-invasive techniques for quantifying internal carotid artery CA stenosis, per cent luminal diameter reduction on intraarterial angiograms (IAA) was measured in 63 patients with ICA stenosis or occlusion. These data were compared with independent measurements based on MR-angiography, continuous-wave (cw) Doppler ultrasonography, systolic peak flow velocity and colour Doppler assisted duplex imaging. Correlations with IAA were equally strong for MR angiography, cw Doppler and colour Doppler analysis (0.95; 0.92; 0.92). Positive predictive values for > or = 70% ICA stenosis were lower and negative predictive values were higher for cw Doppler (0.85; 0.92) and colour duplex analysis (0.81; 0.94) than for MR angiography (0.86; 0.88). Statistical analysis showed non-linear correlations between percentage of lumen diameter narrowing and the length of the zone of signal intensity loss (0.72) and maximum systolic peak flow velocity (0.77). CONCLUSION: Several non-invasive methods do compare with IAA in identifying and quantifying high-grade ICA stenosis and may suffice for decisions on treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Does multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography reduce the incremental value of indirect CT venography compared with single-detector row CT pulmonary angiography?

PURPOSE: To compare retrospectively the incremental value of indirect computed tomographic (CT) venography performed after multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography and single-detector row CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The institutional ethics committee approved this study; informed consent was not required. The authors retrospectively reviewed results of 1100 combined single-detector row CT pulmonary angiographic and indirect CT venographic examinations (542 men, 558 women; mean age, 61 years +/- 17 [standard deviation]) (group 1) and 308 combined multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiographic and indirect CT venographic examinations (150 men, 158 women; mean age, 62 years +/- 18) (group 2), performed in 1408 patients suspected of having pulmonary embolism (PE). Frequency of deep venous thrombosis (DVT), PE, and VTE, and the incremental value of indirect CT venography were recorded in both groups. Data were compared by means of the Student t test for continuous data and z statistics for independent proportions. RESULTS: VTE, PE, and DVT were found in 23.3% (n = 256), 19.9% (n = 219), and 18.3% (n = 201) of the 1100 patients in group 1, respectively, and in 23.7% (n = 73), 17.2% (n = 53), and 18.8% (n = 58) of the 308 patients in group 2, respectively (P values ranging from .273 to .876). The incremental value of indirect CT venography was 14.4% (37 of 256 patients) in group 1 and 27.4% (20 of 73 patients) in group 2. CONCLUSION: Despite potential improved accuracy of multi-detector row CT pulmonary angiography for the diagnosis of PE, the addition of indirect CT venography increased the diagnosis of VTE in 27.4% of patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2001

[Spiral computed tomographic angiography as a substitute for intra-arterial angiography of aorta and its branches].

Until recently, intra-arterial angiography was the diagnostic method of first choice when pathology of the aorta or its branches was suspected. A disadvantage of this technique is that only the lumen of spaces with blood flow can be visualised and that the soft tissue surroundings remain (partly) invisible. Spiral computer tomographic angiography (CTA) has some major advantages compared with conventional angiography. The technique is less invasive and faster. Also, the soft tissue is imaged by CTA. In addition, computer reconstructions allow viewing from all directions without the limitations of overprojection. Spiral CTA is a suitable technique for imaging the thoracic part of the aorta: in case of dissection if transoesophageal echography is not available, in case of an aneurysm to determine the diameter and in case of rupture as a highly sensitive but not very specific examination technique. For imaging of the abdominal part of the aorta, spiral CTA may be considered. In case of an aneurysm or a possible rupture of this part of the aorta it is then possible to visualize the operation area and to choose the optimal approach. For the exclusion of stenoses in mesenteric arteries or in renal arteries, spiral CTA offers the advantage of non-invasivity. The technique is less suitable for demonstration of these stenoses and does not allow immediate intervention.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Magnetic resonance angiography compared to intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography in patients with subarachnoid haemorrhage.

In order to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) in spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage, 14 patients with recent haemorrhage verified by CT or lumbar puncture were investigated with both selective intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IA-DSA) and MRA by two independent teams, each having the same preangiographic information. The results were compared with each other and whenever possible (all positive cases except one) with those of surgical intervention. Seven patients were identified by MRA and IA-DSA as having a single aneurysm on the circle of Willis, 1 an aneurysm of the posterior inferior cerebellar artery 1 an aneurysm of the internal carotid artery (siphon) and 2 patients with two aneurysms on the circle of Willis. MRA and IA-DSA both failed to demonstrate aneurysms in 2 cases. Three patients had negative results on both methods and no surgical intervention was attempted. The aneurysms ranged from 0.3 to 1.5 cm in size. In most cases there was agreement between MRA and DSA, leading us to believe that, if the proper protocols are followed, MRA is a powerful alternative to other established methods in the detection of intracranial aneurysms. At this stage it will not replace IA-DSA prior to surgery, but the ability to obtain various projections using 3D MRA may improve surgical planning.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1996

Comparison of magnetic resonance angiography and conventional angiography in sickle cell disease: clinical significance and reliability.

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records and conventional angiograms of 21 patients with known sickle cell disease, who underwent a total of 50 magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) studies. MRA and conventional angiography were assessed separately for evidence of stenosis or occlusion. Follow up MRI/MRA studies were also assessed for evidence of progression, regression or stability of the disease in these patients. In the carotid circulation, MRA made the correct diagnosis in 85% of the vessels evaluated with a sensitivity of 80.5% and a specificity of 94%. MRA was also found to show evidence of disease progression, more often than did MRI or the clinical condition of the patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Carotid artery stenosis: contrast-enhanced MR angiography with two different scan times compared with digital subtraction angiography.

Contrast enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) is a non-invasive alternative to conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). CE MRA is increasingly used as a complement to Duplex in the preoperative assessment of carotid artery stenosis. The purpose of this study was to determine if CE MRA could replace preoperative DSA. CE MRA with a scan time of 10 or 28 s was performed in 24 consecutive patients who were scheduled for preoperative DSA because of Duplex-verified severe carotid artery stenosis. Two neuroradiologists measured the degree of stenosis with three different methods, and the image quality was evaluated. DSA was used as the gold standard. For detection of severe stenosis (N. American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (NASCET) > or =70%; European symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial (ECST) > or =80%; common carotid artery method (CCAM) > or =80%), the sensitivity of CE MRA maximum intensity projection (MIP) compared with DSA was 82%-100 %, the specificity was 74%-93% and the accuracy was 77%-90%. The inter-observer agreement was higher, the image quality was better and the intracranial main arteries were better visualized with the 28 s than with the 10 s scan time. The enhancement of the jugular veins seen in 17% of the 10 s scans and in 58% of the patients with the 28 s scans did not interfere with the evaluation of the carotid arteries. CE MRA, preferably with a scan time of 28 s, can replace DSA in the preoperative assessment of most patients with carotid artery stenosis.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Comparison of MR angiography and conventional angiography in the investigation of intracranial arteriovenous malformations and aneurysms in children.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is an attractive alternative to conventional catheter angiography (CCA) in children, especially for the detection of intracranial arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) or aneurysms in the out-of-hours setting, because it has fewer risks and complications. OBJECTIVE. To compare MRA with CCA for the detection of intracranial AVMs, aneurysms and arterial anatomy in children. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective blinded review of MRAs and CCAs by two independent paediatric radiologists, in a group of 19 children already diagnosed with AVMs, aneurysms and subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) and who had undergone both imaging techniques. RESULTS: Abnormalities were identified on MRA in 15 of 19 patients and by CCA in 11 of 19 patients. MRA showed one aneurysm, nine AVMs, three haemorrhages and two indeterminate lesions. CCA showed nine AVMs and two indeterminate lesions. The two modalities showed excellent correlation in the detection of AVMs in nine patients. Vascular supply to the AVMs correlated well in four cases. There was complete disagreement in the determination of vessel supply in one case, and in two cases CCA showed additional vessel supply compared to MRA, while in two further cases MRA showed an additional vessel supply compared to CCA. CCA was superior to MRA in demonstrating arterial anatomy, except with regard to the anterior and posterior communicating arteries where MRA was superior. CONCLUSIONS: The high sensitivity of MRA in the detection of AVMs when compared to CCA and the low incidence of aneurysms support the use of MRA as the initial imaging modality when intracranial haemorrhage is diagnosed on CT, especially in the out-of-hours setting.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Magnetic resonance angiography of the peripheral vessels in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease: when is an additional conventional angiography required?

The purpose of this work was to find out how often the clinician asks for a conventional angiography (CA) in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease (PAOD) after a magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) has been performed and how often the CA reveals additional information for therapy planning. Quality criteria for the MRA were defined and tested to see whether they can predict the need for an additional CA. In this prospective study, 81 patients suffering from PAOD (Fontaine classification IIa, n = 13; IIb, n = 33; III, n = 10; IV, n = 25) were examined with a 1.5-T MR-scanner with dedicated coils using a step-by-step technique. The vascular surgeon decided whether he could plan the therapy on the basis of the MRA or if he needed an additional CA. The MRA was assessed in terms of the image quality of the MRA and regarding therapeutic management of the patient in a two-grade scale: sufficient and insufficient. In 27/81 (33%) patients, the clinician asked for a CA, which revealed new information in only 11 patients. The relative number of MRAs with insufficient image quality was significantly higher (p < 0.01) in the group with additional information on CA (8/11) compared to the group without additional information (0/16). The assessment of an MRA based on image quality and regarding therapeutic management of the patient might reduce the number of CAs for therapy planning in patients with PAOD.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Thoracic aortic stent graft: comparison of contrast-enhanced MR angiography and CT angiography in the follow-up: initial results.

The objective of this study was to compare contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA) and multislice computed tomographic angiography (MS CTA) in the follow-up of thoracic stent-graft placement. The CE MRA and MS CTA were performed following nitinol stent-graft treatment due to thoracic aneurysm ( n=4), intramural bleeding ( n=2) and type-B aortic dissection ( n=5). Corresponding evaluation of arterial-phase imaging characteristics focused on the stent-graft morphology and leakage assessment. Stent-graft and aneurysm extensions were comparable between both techniques. Complete exclusion (aneurysm, n=4; dissection, n=2) was assessed with high confidence with CE MRA and MS CTA. Incomplete exclusion (intramural bleeding, n=2; dissection, n=3) was assigned to lower confidence scores on CE MRA compared with MS CTA. On CE MRA the stent-graft lumen demonstrated an inhomogeneous signal, the stent struts could not be assessed. The CE MRA can be used as alternative non-invasive imaging for follow-up of nitinol stent grafts. Arterial-phase leak assessment can be less evident in CE MRA compared with MS CTA studies; therefore, the use of late-phase imaging seems to be necessary. The diagnostic gap of stent-graft fracture evaluation using MRA may be filled with plain radiographs.

Aged↗

PubMed2003

Gadobutrol-enhanced moving-table magnetic resonance angiography in patients with peripheral vascular disease: a prospective, multi-centre blinded comparison with digital subtraction angiography.

The purpose of this study was to compare moving-table three-dimensional contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE MRA), using 1.0-mol gadobutrol, with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (i.a. DSA) for evaluation of pelvic and peripheral arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease. A total of 203 patients were examined in a prospective, multi-centre study at 1.0/1.5 T. Ten vessel segments of one leg were evaluated on-site and by three independent blinded reviewers off-site. One hundred eighty-two patients were evaluable in blinded reading. For pelvis and thigh, there was statistically significant diagnostic agreement between CE MRA and i.a. DSA on-site (94%) and off-site (86-88%). Overall, for detection of clinically significant stenoses, 93% sensitivity and 90% specificity were achieved in on-site evaluation, with 71-76 and 87-93% off-site; for detection of occlusion, sensitivity and specificity on-site were 91 and 97%, with 75-82 and 94-98% off-site. Evaluation was more sensitive on-site than off-site for detection of stenoses and occlusion, whereas specificity was similar. The CE MRA with 1.0-mol gadobutrol gave results comparable to those of i.a. DSA for the larger arteries of pelvis and thigh. Results for calf arteries were compromised by spatial resolution and technical limitations.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗

PubMed2003

[Evaluation of the lower leg vessels before microsurgical fibula transfer. Magnetic resonance angiography versus digital subtraction angiography].

BACKGROUND: Since the introduction of the fibula flap by Taylor in 1975, and its first application in the lower jaw by Hidalgo in 1989, it has become an option of first choice in mandibular reconstruction of large oromandibular defects. Perfusion of the osteomyocutaneous fibula transplant is based on the peroneal artery. To avoid postoperative ischaemia of the lower leg after sacrificing this artery, especially in smokers, adequate perfusion must be guaranteed preoperatively by radiological evaluation. Progress in the field of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) enables an increasing number of primary non-invasive evaluations of vessels. The aim of this prospective study was to answer the question of whether MRA enables a accurate representation of anatomical variation and pathological stenoses of the lower leg vessels and can therefore replace conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We carried out conventional DSA of the lower leg before raising a fibula transplant and postoperative MRA with contrast medium in a prospective study with 15 patients. Vessels were assessed for atherosclerotic, occlusive or hypoplastic changes and anatomical variations by three radiologists. RESULTS: High resolution of MRA enables a reliable judgement of the lower leg vessels. Hypoplastic vessels, stenoses, occlusion or atherosclerotic changes of the vessels could definitely be detected by MRA just as by DSA. Thus, all patients without these diagnosed contraindications could be operated successfully. CONCLUSION: MRA of the lower leg enables a definitive determination of the vessel quality and the site of preference for harvesting the flap. Because MRA is a low risk procedure, can be carried out on an outpatient basis and causes no radiation load, it should be preferred to conventional DSA.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

MR angiography versus intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography of the lower extremities: activity-based cost analysis.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyse the costs pertaining to the radiology department of magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the evaluation of arterial disease of the lower limbs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The differential cost of the two procedures, i.e. the sum of equipment costs (amortisation and service contract), variable costs (supplies and related services) and personnel costs (radiologist, radiographer and nurse) was determined. The common cost (auxiliary personnel and indirect internal costs) was also calculated. Finally, the full cost of the two procedures was obtained (sum of differential and common costs). RESULTS: The differential cost of MRA was 186.14 euro (equipment costs: 50.80 euro, variable costs: 75.04 euro, personnel costs: 60.30 euro) while the differential cost of intra-arterial DSA was 238.18 euro (equipment costs: 57.60 euro, variable costs: 90.13 euro, staff costs: 90.45 euro). The estimated common cost was 5.62 euro. Therefore, the full cost of MRA was 191.76 euro and the full cost of intra-arterial DSA was 243.80 euro (27.1% higher). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Intra-arterial DSA costs more than MRA, mainly because of the higher costs of supplies used during the procedure and higher personnel costs (as a result of the longer duration of intra-arterial DSA). It should be noted that our evaluation considers costs pertaining to the radiology department only. It is evident that an economic analysis considering hospital costs as well would result in much higher costs for DSA if post-procedure hospitalisation is required. Our results cannot be simply exported to other radiology departments since they refer to the technology and organisation adopted in our department. However, our cost analysis model can be easily applied to other environments. MRA provides good diagnostic accuracy in the evaluation of arteries of the lower extremities, and its biological cost is far lower than that of intra-arterial DSA (MRA is noninvasive, it does not use ionising radiation, and the contrast medium is safe). Its lower cost is another argument in favour of the use of MRA instead of intra-arterial DSA in the evaluation of lower-extremity arterial disease.

Angiography, Digital Subtraction↗

PubMed1995

Non-selective digital subtraction angiography in comparison with selective conventional angiography in the diagnosis of carotid artery disease.

In the recent past, non-selective arterial digital subtraction angiography (NSDSA) seemed a less invasive alternative to conventional filmscreen angiography (CFA) in the diagnosis of carotid artery disease. NSDSA obviated the need for selective catheterization with its associated risks but yet took advantage of the DSA method. However, this technique has not found general application although there are no reports that formally assess the (dis)advantages of NSDSA. The aim of our study was to compare the reliability of NSDSA with CFA in evaluation of carotid bifurcations in patients with transient ischemic attacks or partial stroke by reviewing prospectively collected data. Over a 2-year period, 40 patients (upper age limit 65 years) underwent both NSDSA and CFA. Bilateral NSDSA was performed in all 40 patients (80 bifurcations). Bilateral CFA was performed in 27 patients whereas unilateral CFA was carried out in 13 patients (67 bifurcations). Inter- and intra-observer variability for the degree of stenosis was determined by calculation of kappa-values for a 4-point and a 2-point scale. The proportion of interpretable studies was significantly lower in NSDSA. The inter- and intra-observer agreement was on average better in CFA examinations, though the difference was only statistically significant for the inter-observer agreement. The results of our study indicate that images obtained with NSDSA give less reliable information about carotid artery disease than images obtained with CFA. This is in accordance with the fact that NSDSA now seems an abandoned technique.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Magnetic resonance angiography of coronary arteries with a 3-dimensional magnetization-prepared true fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence compared with conventional coronary angiography.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to compare the detection of clinically significant coronary artery stenosis using a magnetic resonance 3-dimensional (3D) breath-hold true fast imaging with steady-state precession (trueFISP) sequence with conventional coronary angiography. METHODS: Twenty-nine patients who were scheduled to undergo or had recently undergone diagnostic conventional coronary angiogram participated in this study. The left main, left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries were studied using the 3D breath-hold trueFISP technique. Each artery was imaged with 1 acquisition in 16 to 32 heartbeats. The image quality, vessel length, and presence or absence of stenosis were evaluated. A score of 1 to 3 (1 = noninterpretable, 2 = good, 3 = excellent) was used to assess image quality. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of magnetic resonance angiography in detecting significant coronary artery stenosis (> 50% luminal narrowing) on conventional coronary angiogram were calculated. RESULTS: Of 116 vessels, 108 were assessed in 29 patients. Twenty vessels that had image quality score of 1 were excluded from further evaluation. The mean lengths of vessels visualized were the following: left anterior descending 3.6 cm, left circumflex 3.4 cm, and right coronary 6.6 cm. The entire length of the left main coronary artery was visualized. For the visualized arterial segments, the sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for detecting significant coronary artery stenosis were 92.8%, 95.3%, 95.0%, 68.4%, and 99.2%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The 3D breath-hold trueFISP technique, which uses the endogenous contrast of blood, is potentially useful in ruling out significant coronary artery stenosis but not yet sensitive enough as a screening tool.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Likelihood ratios in the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis by magnetic resonance angiography compared with renal angiography.

BACKGROUND: Renal angiography (RA) is considered to be the gold standard for the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis (RAS). However, it is invasive and potentially harmful; hence there is a need for an optimal noninvasive test. Magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) is currently accepted as the optimal noninvasive test by many. However, its major drawback is its inability to grade quantitatively the degree of stenosis. In this study, likelihood ratios (LR) were used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of MRA with that of RA. METHODS: To test the hypothesis that semiquantitatively graded MRA would correlate with RA, a retrospective analysis was performed to determine the LR of MRA to diagnose RAS compared with RA. It was believed that LR > or = 10.0 or < or =0.1 might generate conclusive changes from pretest to post-test probabilities. In this study a total of 94 renal arteries from 48 patients were analyzed for RAS by MRA and RA. Stenoses were graded by MRA as mild (<50%), moderate (50% to 75%), or severe (>75%); and by RA as <75% or > or =75% stenosis. RESULTS: The LR was 0.13 (95% CI = 0.09 to 0.19) for mild stenosis, 0.11 (95% CI = 0.08 to 0.15) for moderate stenosis, and 2.2 (95% CI = 1.9 to 3.1) for severe stenosis by MRA. CONCLUSIONS: Nonsevere stenosis can be sufficiently diagnosed by MRA and may not warrant RA. However, it may be insufficiently precise to establish severe RAS based on LR results. Therefore, for severe RAS by MRA, the decision to obtain RA can be made with the help of post-test probability, which is determined using pretest probability and LR.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

Conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography versus magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of carotid disease: patient satisfaction and preferences.

AIM: To compare conventional digital subtraction x-ray angiography (DSA) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries in terms of patient satisfaction and preferences. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-seven patients with symptomatic carotid artery disease, who underwent both DSA and MRA, were prospectively recruited in this study. Patients' perceptions of each method were assessed by the use of a questionnaire after each procedure. Main outcome measures were anxiety, pain, satisfaction rate and patient preferences. RESULTS: DSA generated more anxiety and pain during the procedure, but the severity of these ill-effects was mild. Satisfaction rates for each method were similar. More patients were, however, willing to have a repeat MRA compared with DSA (67 versus 41%). The majority of patients (62%) preferred MRA over DSA (31%). The shorter MRA imaging time was found to be a significant factor in patients' acceptance of the technique. The main reasons cited by patients for their dislike of a particular procedure was noise and claustrophobia for MRA and invasiveness, pain and post-procedural bed rest for DSA. CONCLUSIONS: MRA is the method that is preferred by the majority of patients, although the actual disutility of DSA may be small. Assuming equal diagnostic accuracy, our data supports replacement of DSA by MRA for routine carotid imaging.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

Postoperative three-dimensional CT angiography after cerebral aneurysm clipping with titanium clips: detection with single detector CT. Comparison with intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography.

AIM: To assess the significance of three-dimensional computed tomography angiography (3D-CTA) in detecting remnant necks after cerebral aneurysm clipping. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 59 patients (77 aneurysms) underwent surgery using titanium clips. Two blinded observers independently evaluated the presence of neck remnants on shaded-surface display (SSD) imaging, volume rendered (VR) imaging, and intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography (IADSA). RESULTS: Mean sensitivity and specificity for detecting neck remnants were 50.0 and 74.2% for SSD imaging, 61.5 and 82.8% for VR imaging, and 92.3 and 92.2% for IADSA, respectively. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis revealed excellent diagnostic performance for IADSA [mean area under ROC curve (Az)=0.97], and good diagnostic performance for 3D-CTA (Az=0.70 and 0.76 for SSD and VR, respectively). Specificity of VR was better than that SSD (p=0.082), however, there was no significant difference between them. CONCLUSION: Use of 3D-CTA techniques can facilitate postoperative evaluation.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Stenosis detection in failing hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts: comparison of color Doppler ultrasonography, contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography, and digital subtraction angiography.

OBJECTIVE: Several imaging modalities are available for the evaluation of dysfunctional hemodialysis shunts. Color Doppler ultrasonography (CDUS) and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) are most widely used for the detection of access stenoses, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) of shunts has recently been introduced. To date, no study has compared the value of these three modalities for stenosis detection in dysfunctional shunts. We prospectively compared CDUS and CE-MRA with DSA for the detection of significant (> or = 50%) stenoses in failing dialysis accesses, and we determined whether the interventionalist would benefit from CDUS performed before DSA and endovascular intervention. METHODS: CDUS, CE-MRA, and DSA were performed of 49 dysfunctional hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulas and 32 grafts. The vascular tree of the accesses was divided into three to eight segments depending on the access type (arteriovenous fistula or arteriovenous graft) and the length of venous outflow. CDUS was performed and assessed by a vascular technician, whereas CE-MRA and DSA were interpreted by two magnetic resonance radiologists and two interventional radiologists, respectively. All readers were blinded to information from each other and from other studies. DSA was used as reference standard for stenosis detection. RESULTS: DSA detected 111 significant (> or = 50%) stenoses in 433 vascular segments. Sensitivity and specificity of CDUS for the detection of significant stenosed vessel segments were 91% (95% CI, 84%-95%) and 97% (95% CI, 94%-98%), respectively. We found a positive predictive value of 91% (95% CI, 84%-95%) and a negative predictive value of 97% (95% CI, 94%-98%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of MRA were 96% (95% CI, 90%-98%), 98% (95% CI, 96%-99%), 94% (95% CI, 88%-97%), and 98% (95% CI, 96%-99%), respectively. CDUS and CE-MRA depicted respectively three and four significant stenoses in six nondiagnostic DSA segments. The interventionalist would have chosen an alternative cannulation site in 38% of patients if the CDUS results had been available. CONCLUSIONS: We suggest that CDUS be used as initial imaging modality of dysfunctional shunts, but complete access should be depicted at DSA and angioplasty to detect all significant stenoses eligible for intervention. CE-MRA should be considered only if DSA is inconclusive.

Adult↗