SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Cannabinoids”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

PubMed1993

Evidence for a cannabinoid receptor in sea urchin sperm and its role in blockade of the acrosome reaction.

Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol ((-)delta 9 THC), the primary psychoactive cannabinoid in marihuana, reduces the fertilizing capacity of sea urchin sperm by blocking the acrosome reaction that normally is stimulated by a specific ligand in the egg's jelly coat. The bicyclic synthetic cannabinoid [3H]CP-55,940 has been used as a ligand to demonstrate the presence of a cannabinoid receptor in mammalian brain. We now report that [3H]CP-55,940 binds to live sea urchin (Strongylocentrotus purpuratus) sperm in a concentration, sperm density, and time-dependent manner. Specific binding of [3H]CP-55,940 to sperm, defined as total binding displaced by (-)delta 9THC, was saturable: KD 5.16 +/- 1.02 nM; Hill coefficient 0.98 +/- 0.004. This suggests a single class of receptor sites and the absence of significant cooperative interactions. Sea urchin sperm contain 712 +/- 122 cannabinoid receptors per cell. Binding of [3H]CP-55,940 to sperm was reduced in a dose-dependent manner by increasing concentrations of CP-55,940, (-)delta 9THC, and (+)delta 9THC. The rank order of potency to inhibit binding of [3H]CP-55,940 to sperm and to block the egg jelly stimulated acrosome reaction was: CP-55,940 > (-)delta 9THC > (+)delta 9THC. These findings show that sea urchin sperm contain a stereospecific cannabinoid receptor that may play a role in inhibition of the acrosome reaction. The radioligand binding data obtained with live sea urchin sperm are remarkably similar to those previously published by other investigators using [3H]CP-55,940 on mammalian brain and nonneural tissues. The cannabinoid binding properties of this receptor appear to have been highly conserved during evolution. We postulate that the cannabinoid receptor may modulate cellular responses to stimulation.

Acrosome↗

PubMed2003

Expression of functionally active cannabinoid receptor CB1 in the human prostate gland.

BACKGROUND: Cannabinoids exert a wide spectrum of effects in men including alterations in the reproductive system. To date, two types of cannabinoid receptors have been cloned in humans, namely CB(1) and CB(2) belonging to the G protein-coupled receptor superfamily. Although cannabinoids have functional and morphologic effects in the prostate gland, the expression of cannabinoid receptors in this tissue has never been investigated. The aim of this study was to analyze the expression of cannabinoid receptors in the human prostate gland and their regulatory effects on adenylyl cyclase activity. METHODS: To investigate the existence of cannabinoid receptors in prostate, we used various methods, including reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction, Western blotting, and immunohistochemistry. Adenylyl cyclase activity was analyzed by measuring the cAMP produced by means of a competitive assay by using PKA. RESULTS: Both mRNA for CB(1) and the corresponding protein are expressed in the human prostate gland at a level comparable with the receptor expressed in cerebellum. The molecular mass of the protein estimated from Western blot analysis was 58 kDa, which is in concordance with previous data for CB(1) in other tissues. Immunohistochemical studies show that CB(1) is preferentially expressed in the epithelia of the prostate. The cannabinoid receptor expressed in the prostate negatively regulates adenylyl cyclase activity through a pertussis toxin-sensitive protein.

Adenylyl Cyclases↗

PubMed2005

[The endogenous cannabinoid system. Therapeutic implications for neurologic and psychiatric disorders].

For about 5,000 years, cannabis has been used as a therapeutic agent. There has been growing interest in the medical use of cannabinoids. This is based on the discovery that cannabinoids act with specific receptors (CB1 and CB2). CB1 receptors are located in specific brain areas (e.g. cerebellum, basal ganglia, and hippocampus) and CB2 receptors on cells of the immune system. Endogenous ligands of the cannabinoid receptors were also discovered (e.g. anandamids). Many physiologic processes are modulated by the two subtypes of cannabinoid receptor: motor functions, memory, appetite, and pain. These innovative neurobiologic/pharmacologic findings could possibly lead to the use of synthetic and natural cannabinoids as therapeutic agents in various areas. Until now, cannabinoids were used as antiemetic agents in chemotherapy-induced emesis and in patients with HIV-wasting syndrome. Evidence suggests that cannabinoids may prove useful in some other diseases, e.g. movement disorders such as Gilles de la Tourette's syndrome, multiple sclerosis, and pain. These new findings also explain the acute adverse effects following cannabis use.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

The peripheral sympathetic nervous system is the major target of cannabinoids in eliciting cardiovascular depression.

Our objective was to identify the sites of interaction of cannabinoids with cardiovascular sympathetic regulation in the rat. Effects on sympathetic tone were first determined in anaesthetised animals following i.v. administration of the drugs. Central effects were evaluated in anaesthetised rats receiving microinjections of cannabinoids into brain stem nuclei. Peripheral effects were identified in pithed rats with electrically stimulated sympathetic outflow. In anaesthetised and artificially ventilated rats, i.v. injection of the cannabinoid agonists WIN55212-2 and CP55940 decreased mean arterial pressure, heart rate and the plasma noradrenaline concentration. These effects were antagonized by the CB(1) cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A. The bradycardia was abolished by the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonist methylatropine. The decreases in mean arterial pressure and heart rate caused by cannabinoids in ventilated rats were much less pronounced than in spontaneously breathing rats. Microinjection of WIN55212-2 into the nucleus tractus solitarii had no effect. Microinjected into the rostral ventrolateral medulla oblongata, WIN55212-2 lowered mean arterial pressure slightly without changing other parameters. In pithed rats, WIN55212-2 inhibited the increases in mean arterial pressure, heart rate and the plasma noradrenaline concentration evoked by electrical stimulation of the sympathetic outflow. Our results show that activation of CB(1) cannabinoid receptors induces sympathoinhibition and enhancement of cardiac vagal tone, leading to hypotension and bradycardia. Presynaptic inhibition of noradrenaline release from terminals of postganglionic sympathetic neurons is the major component of the sympathoinhibition, but an effect in the rostral ventrolateral medulla oblongata may also contribute. The cannabinoid-evoked cardiovascular depression depends strongly on the respiratory state of the animals.

Animals↗

PubMed1996

Cannabinoid receptor stimulation of guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate binding in rat brain membranes.

Cannabinoid receptors belong to the class of G-protein-coupled receptors which inhibit adenylyl cyclase. Coupling of receptors to G-proteins can be assessed by the ability of agonists to stimulate guanosine-5'-O-(3-[35S]thio)triphosphate ([35S]GTP gamma S) binding in the presence of excess GDP. The present study examined the effect of cannabinoid agonists on [35S]GTP gamma S binding in rat brain membranes. Assays were conducted with 0.05 nM [35S]GTP gamma S, incubated with rat cerebellar membranes, 1-30 microM GDP and the cannabinoid agonist WIN 55212-2. Results showed that the ability of WIN 55212-2 to stimulate [35S]GTP gamma S binding increased with increasing concentrations of GDP, with 10-30 microM GDP providing approximately 150-200% stimulation by the cannabinoid agonist. The pharmacology of cannabinoid agonist stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding paralleled that of previously reported receptor binding and adenylyl cyclase assays, and agonist stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding was blocked by the cannabinoid antagonist SR141716A. Brain regional studies revealed widespread stimulation of [35S]GTP gamma S binding by WIN 55212-2 in a number of brain areas, consistent with in vitro [35S]GTP gamma S autoradiography. These results demonstrate that [35S]GTP gamma S binding in the presence of excess GDP is an effective measure of cannabinoid receptor coupling to G-proteins in brain membranes.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

A role for cannabinoid receptors, but not endogenous opioids, in the antinociceptive activity of the CB2-selective agonist, GW405833.

Several recent reports have demonstrated a role for selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonists in pain modulation, showing both analgesic and antihyperalgesic activities. While the mechanism of action is poorly understood, it has been postulated that these effects may be indirect, involving release of endogenous opioids. We have previously reported that administration of the selective cannabinoid CB2 receptor agonist GW405833 (2,3-dichloro-phenyl)-[5-methoxy-2-methyl-3-(2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-indol-1-yl]-methanone) to rats elicits potent and efficacious antihyperalgesic effects against neuropathic and inflammatory pain and, at high dose (100 mg/kg), is analgesic and ataxic [Valenzano, K.J., Tafesse, L., Lee, G., Harrison, J.E., Boulet, J., Gottshall, S.L., Mark, L., Pearson, M.S., Miller, W., Shan, S., Rabadi, L., Rotstheyn, Y., Chaffer, S.M., Turchin, P.I., Elsemore, D.A., Toth, M., Koetzner, L., Whiteside, G.T., 2005. Pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characterization of the cannabinoid receptor 2 agonist, GW405833, utilizing rodent models of acute and chronic pain, anxiety, ataxia and catalepsy. Neuropharmacology 48, 658-672]. In the current study, we confirm these properties using mouse models and investigate the role of cannabinoid CB2 receptors using knockout animals. Furthermore, we provide evidence that the antinociceptive properties of GW405833 are opioid independent. GW405833 elicited robust antihyperalgesic effects in mouse models of inflammatory (Freund's complete adjuvant) and neuropathic (Seltzer) pain. In contrast, GW405833 showed no antihyperalgesic activity against Freund's complete adjuvant-mediated inflammatory pain in cannabinoid CB2 receptor knockout mice. As in rats, high-dose GW405833 (100 mg/kg) showed both analgesic and sedative activities in wild-type mice, activities that were also apparent in cannabinoid CB2 receptor knockout mice. In rats, neither the antihyperalgesic effect in the Freund's complete adjuvant model nor the analgesic effects in tail flick and hot plate assays were inhibited by pre-treatment with the non-selective opioid receptor antagonist, naltrexone. These data demonstrate that the antihyperalgesic effects of GW405833 are mediated via the cannabinoid CB2 receptor, whereas the analgesic and sedative effects are not. Furthermore, these data suggest that the mechanism of action for GW405833 does not depend on the release of endogenous opioids.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2006

Cannabinoid receptor CB2 modulates the CXCL12/CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis of T lymphocytes.

Cannabinoids have been shown to influence the immune system. However, their immunomodulatory effects have not been extensively studied. In this investigation, we have observed that both primary and Jurkat T cells express a functional cannabinoid receptor 2 (CB(2)). Furthermore, both the synthetic cannabinoids CP55,940 and WIN55,212-2, as well as the CB(2)-selective agonist JWH-015, caused a significant inhibition of the chemokine CXCL12-induced and CXCR4-mediated chemotaxis of Jurkat T cells, as well as their transendothelial migration. Involvement of the CB(2) receptor was further confirmed by partial reversal of the inhibition using the CB(2)-specific antagonist, AM630. Similarly, CP55,940 and JWH-015 inhibited the CXCL12-induced chemotaxis of primary CD4(+) and CD8(+) T lymphocytes. Further investigation of signaling studies to delineate the mechanism of inhibition revealed that cannabinoids enhance CXCL12-induced p44/42 MAP kinase activity. However, enhanced MAP kinase activity was not responsible for the inhibition of chemotaxis. This suggests that cannabinoids differentially regulate CXCR4-mediated migration and MAP kinase activation in T cells. Cannabinoids were also found to downregulate the PMA-enhanced enzyme activity of matrix metalloproteinase-9, which is known to play an important role in transendothelial migration. This study provides novel information regarding cannabinoid modulation of functional effects in T cells.

Calcium↗

PubMed1998

Ipsilateral turning behavior induced by unilateral microinjections of a cannabinoid into the rat subthalamic nucleus.

The subthalamic nucleus contains cannabinoid receptors and cannabinoid receptor mRNA. However, the role of cannabinoid receptors in this nucleus has not been examined. In order to investigate the functional role of cannabinoid receptors in the rat subthalamic nucleus, turning activity was observed following unilateral microinjection of the synthetic cannabinoid CP 55,940. CP 55,940 (10 microg) induced ipsilateral turning. This effect was blocked by coadministration of the cannabinoid receptor antagonist SR141716A (5 microg). These results suggest that cannabinoid receptors in the subthalamic nucleus mediate an inhibition of motor activity.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Distinct cannabinoid sensitive receptors regulate hippocampal excitation and inhibition.

One of the well-known effects of cannabinoids is the impairment of cognitive processes, including short-term memory formation, by altering hippocampal and neocortical functions reflected in network activity. Acting on presynaptically located G protein-coupled receptors in the hippocampus, cannabinoids modulate the release of neurotransmitter molecules. CB1 cannabinoid receptors, so far the only cloned cannabinoid receptor type in the CNS, are selectively expressed on the axon terminals of a subset of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons containing the neuropeptide cholecystokinin. Activation of CB1 receptors reduces GABA release from presynaptic terminals, thereby increasing the excitability of principal cells. Novel, non-CB1 cannabinoid sensitive receptors are present on the hippocampal excitatory axon terminals, which suppress glutamate release. These cannabinoid receptors have distinct pharmacological features compared to CB1, i.e. WIN 55212-2 is an order of magnitude less potent in reducing glutamatergic transmission than in inhibiting GABAergic postsynaptic currents, and the novel receptor binds vanilloid receptor ligands. Thus, at least two different cannabinoid sensitive presynaptic receptors regulate network activity in the hippocampus, CB1 via the GABAergic interneurons, and a new receptor via a direct action on pyramidal cell axon terminals.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Spinal and peripheral mechanisms of cannabinoid antinociception: behavioral, neurophysiological and neuroanatomical perspectives.

A large body of literature indicates that cannabinoids suppress behavioral responses to acute and persistent noxious stimulation. This review examines behavioral, neurophysiological and neuroanatomical evidence supporting a role for cannabinoids in suppressing nociceptive transmission at spinal and peripheral levels. The development of subtype-selective competitive antagonists and high-affinity agonists provides the pharmacological tools required to study cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms. These studies provide insight into the functional roles of cannabinoid receptor subtypes, CB1 and CB2, in cannabinoid antinociceptive mechanisms as revealed in animal models of acute and persistent (somatic inflammatory, visceral inflammatory, neuropathic) pain. Localization studies employing receptor binding and quantitative autoradiography, immunocytochemistry and in situ hybridization are reviewed to examine the distribution of cannabinoid receptors at these levels and provide a neuroanatomical framework with which to understand the roles of endogenous cannabinoids in sensory processing.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Arvanil-induced inhibition of spasticity and persistent pain: evidence for therapeutic sites of action different from the vanilloid VR1 receptor and cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptors.

Activation of cannabinoid receptors causes inhibition of spasticity, in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis, and of persistent pain, in the rat formalin test. The endocannabinoid anandamide inhibits spasticity and persistent pain. It not only binds to cannabinoid receptors but is also a full agonist at vanilloid receptors of type 1 (VR1). We found here that vanilloid VR1 receptor agonists (capsaicin and N-N'-(3-methoxy-4-aminoethoxy-benzyl)-(4-tert-butyl-benzyl)-urea [SDZ-249-665]) exhibit a small, albeit significant, inhibition of spasticity that can be attenuated by the vanilloid VR1 receptor antagonist, capsazepine. Arvanil, a structural "hybrid" between capsaicin and anandamide, was a potent inhibitor of spasticity at doses (e.g. 0.01 mg/kg i.v.) where capsaicin and cannabinoid CB(1) receptor agonists were ineffective. The anti-spastic effect of arvanil was unchanged in cannabinoid CB(1) receptor gene-deficient mice or in wildtype mice in the presence of both cannabinoid and vanilloid receptor antagonists. Likewise, arvanil (0.1-0.25 mg/kg) exhibited a potent analgesic effect in the formalin test, which was not reversed by cannabinoid and vanilloid receptor antagonists. These findings suggest that activation by arvanil of sites of action different from cannabinoid CB(1)/CB(2) receptors and vanilloid VR1 receptors leads to anti-spastic/analgesic effects that might be exploited therapeutically.

Animals↗

PubMed2003

Effects of cannabinoid receptor agonists on immunologically induced histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells.

Immunologic activation of mast cells through the cross-linking of high affinity IgE receptors results in the release of inflammatory mediators which are important in the pathogenesis of allergic reactions. Early studies investigating the effects of palmitoylethanolamide on animal models of inflammation and on rat mast cells led to the hypothesis that endogenous cannabinoids might act as local autacoids which suppressed inflammation by reducing the activation of mast cells. However, more recent studies produced contradicting results. In order to evaluate if cannabinoid receptors are present in mast cells, we studied the effects of endocannabinoids (anandamide and palmitoylethanolamide) and synthetic cannabimimetics (CP 55,940, WIN 55,212-2 and HU-210) on histamine release from rat peritoneal mast cells. When incubated with mast cells alone, only anandamide could induce significant level of histamine release at concentrations higher than 10(-6) M. When mast cells were activated with anti-IgE, the histamine release induced was not affected by anandamide, palmitoylethanolamide and CP 55,940. In contrast, both WIN 55,212-2 and HU-210 enhanced anti-IgE-induced histamine release at 10(-5) M and preincubation did not increase the potency. The histamine releasing action of anandamide and the enhancing effects of WIN 55,212-2 and HU-210 on anti-IgE-induced histamine release were not reduced by the cannabinoid receptor antagonists, AM 281 and AM 630. In conclusion, the present study does not support the hypothesis that cannabinoids suppress mast cell activation. Instead, some of the cannabinoid receptor-directed ligands tested enhanced mast cell activation. However, the high concentrations required and the failure of cannabinoid receptor antagonists to reverse such effects also question the existence of functional cannabinoid receptors in mast cells.

Adjuvants, Immunologic↗

PubMed1998

Cannabinoid receptor binding did not vary in several hypothalamic nuclei after hypothalamic deafferentation.

Cannabinoid receptors are sparsely distributed in the hypothalamic nuclei, although they seem to be located on key neurons because their activation produces important neuroendocrine effects. In the present study, we have examined whether cannabinoid receptor-containing hypothalamic neurons are intrinsic or extrinsic to this brain region. To this end, we have examined whether the hypothalamic deafferentation was followed by a general loss of cannabinoid receptor binding, thus suggesting that cannabinoid receptor-containing neurons would have their cell bodies outside the hypothalamus, or whether this was followed by no changes in binding, thus suggesting that cannabinoid receptors would be located on intrinsic neurons. Three experimental groups were then analyzed: (i) animals with complete hypothalamic deafferentation in both sides; (ii) hemideafferentated animals; and (iii) sham-operated animals. In the three cases, cannabinoid receptor binding did not vary among these three groups in any of the hypothalamic nuclei analyzed. These were the arcuate nucleus, ventromedial hypothalamic nucleus, lateral and dorsal hypothalamic areas, paraventricular nucleus and medial preoptic area. This clearly supports the view that cannabinoid receptor-containing neurons into the hypothalamus are all intrinsic to this brain region.

Animals↗

PubMed1999

Discovery and characterization of endogenous cannabinoids.

The characterization of cannabinoid receptors and signal transduction mechanisms provided the impetus for the searching for endogenous ligands for this system. The result was a family of fatty acid derivatives that interact with cannabinoid receptors to varying degrees. The two ligands that have received the most attention are anandamide (AN) and 2-arachidonolyl-glycerol (Ara-Gl). They are both present in central as well as peripheral tissues. Mechanisms for the synthesis and metabolism of AN have been described. Presently, the physiological stimuli for production and release of AN are unknown. As a result, elucidation of its physiological role remains elusive. However, it seems reasonable to conclude that both AN and 2-Ara-Gl interact with cannabinoid receptors in both peripheral and central tissue to produce a wide range of effects. Administration of these ligands to laboratory animals produce effects that are quite similar to those elicited by delta9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), the psychoactive constituent in marijuana. Nevertheless, there are some pharmacological differences between the plant-derived THC and the endogenous cannabinoids that could be due to either pharmadynamic or pharmacokinetics dissimilarities. Extensive structure-activity relationship studies have provided some vital insights into the actions of the endogenous ligands. First and foremost, systematic structural alterations in AN have additional support that it is acting at the cannabinoid receptors in a fashion similar to that of THC. Development of metabolically stable analogs of AN, as well as those with greater receptor affinity, have helped substantiate AN and THC similarities. Nevertheless, pharmacological differences remain between the endogenous and exogenous ligands. Whether these differences are due to the nature of their interaction with the cannabinoid receptors, activation of unique signaling pathways, interactions with non-cannabinoid receptors, or pharmacokinetic considerations remain to be resolved.

Arachidonic Acids↗

PubMed2001

Studies on [3H]CP-55940 binding in the human central nervous system: regional specific changes in density of cannabinoid-1 receptors associated with schizophrenia and cannabis use.

A number of studies suggested that cannabis use can cause or exacerbate psychoses and may increase the risk of developing schizophrenia. These findings suggest that changes in the cannabinoid system of the brain may be involved in the pathology of schizophrenia. To determine whether changes in the cannabinoid system were present in the brains of subjects with schizophrenia, we used in situ radioligand binding and autoradiography to measure the binding of [3H]CP-55940 to the cannabinoid-1 receptor in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (Brodmann's area 9), caudate-putamen and areas of the temporal lobe from schizophrenic and control subjects, some of whom had ingested cannabis close to death. There was an increase in the density of [3H]CP-55940 binding to cannabinoid-1 receptors in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex from subjects with schizophrenia (mean+/-S.E.M.: 142+/-9.9 vs 119+/-6.6fmol/mg estimated tissue equivalents; P<0.05) that was independent of recent cannabis ingestion. There was an increase in the density of cannabinoid-1 receptors in the caudate-putamen from subjects who had recently ingested cannabis (151+/-9.0 vs 123+/-7.2fmol/mg estimated tissue equivalents; P<0.05) that was independent of diagnoses. These data indicate that there are changes in cannabinoid-1 receptors in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex that may prove to be associated with the pathology of schizophrenia. By contrast, changes in the density of cannabinoid-1 receptors may occur in the caudate-putamen in response to cannabis ingestion.

Brain↗

PubMed2001

Novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor mediates inhibition of glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus.

Psychoactive effects of cannabinoids are thought to be mediated, at least in part, by suppression of both glutamate and GABA release via CB1 cannabinoid receptor. Two types of cannabinoid receptor (CB1 and CB2) have been cloned so far. The CB1 receptors are abundantly expressed in the nervous system, whereas CB2 receptors are limited to lymphoid organs (Matsuda et al., 1990; Munro et al., 1993). Immunocytochemical and electrophysiological studies revealed that in the hippocampus CB1 receptors are expressed on axon terminals of GABAergic inhibitory interneurons (Tsou et al., 1999; Katona et al., 1999) and activation of these receptors decreases GABA release (Hájos et al., 2000). Other physiological studies pointed out the involvement of CB1 receptors in the modulation of hippocampal glutamatergic synaptic transmission and long-term potentiation (Stella et al., 1997; Misner and Sullivan, 1999), but anatomical studies could not confirm the existence of CB1 receptors on glutamatergic terminals. Here we examined cannabinoid actions on both glutamatergic and GABAergic synaptic transmission in the hippocampus of wild type (CB1+/+) and CB1 receptor knockout mice (CB1-/-). The synthetic cannabinoid agonist WIN55,212-2 reduced the amplitudes of excitatory postsynaptic currents in both wild type and CB1-/- mice, while inhibitory postsynaptic currents were decreased only in wild type mice, but not in CB1-/- animals. Our findings are consistent with a CB1 cannabinoid receptor-dependent modulation of GABAergic postsynaptic currents, but a novel cannabinoid-sensitive receptor must be responsible for the inhibition of glutamatergic neurotransmission.

Analgesics↗

PubMed2000

Cannabis and cannabinoid receptors.

Cannabis and cannabinoids exert many of their biological functions through receptor-mediated mechanisms. Two types of cannabinoid receptors have been identified, namely CB(1) and CB(2), both coupled to a G protein. CB(1) receptors have been detected in the central nervous system (where they are responsible for the characteristic effects of Cannabis, including catalepsy, depression of motor activity, analgesia and feelings of relaxation and well being) and in peripheral neurons (where their activation produces a suppression in neurotransmitter release in the heart, bladder, intestine and vas deferens). Cannabinoid CB(2) receptors have only been detected outside the central nervous system, mostly in cells of the immune system, presumably mediating cannabinoid-induced immunosuppression and antinflammatory effects. With the discovery of cannabinoid receptors for exogenous cannabinoids, also endogenous cannabinoids (anandamide, 2-arachidonylglycerol) have been described.

Cannabinoids↗

PubMed1998

An analgesia circuit activated by cannabinoids.

Although many anecdotal reports indicate that marijuana and its active constituent, delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (delta-9-THC), may reduce pain sensation, studies of humans have produced inconsistent results. In animal studies, the apparent pain-suppressing effects of delta-9-THC and other cannabinoid drugs are confounded by motor deficits. Here we show that a brainstem circuit that contributes to the pain-suppressing effects of morphine is also required for the analgesic effects of cannabinoids. Inactivation of the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) prevents the analgesia but not the motor deficits produced by systemically administered cannabinoids. Furthermore, cannabinoids produce analgesia by modulating RVM neuronal activity in a manner similar to, but pharmacologically dissociable from, that of morphine. We also show that endogenous cannabinoids tonically regulate pain thresholds in part through the modulation of RVM neuronal activity. These results show that analgesia produced by cannabinoids and opioids involves similar brainstem circuitry and that cannabinoids are indeed centrally acting analgesics with a new mechanism of action.

Analgesia↗