SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Colonoscopy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

PubMed1996

Tolerance, effectiveness, and acceptability of sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution for colon cleaning before colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The unpleasant taste of the solution used for preparation before colonoscopy may limit patients' compliance with the procedure. However, the published results concerning the acceptability of sulfate-free electrolyte lavage solution (SF-ELS) for colon cleansing before colonoscopy are conflicting. The aim of this study was to compare SF-ELS with the standard polyethylene glycol (PEG) solution with regard to tolerance, effectiveness, and acceptability. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In the first part of the study, 24 patients were assigned to receive either one liter of SF-ELS or one liter of the standard PEG solution. After two hours, the patients had to choose two further liters (of either the first or second solution), and preparation for colonoscopy was completed. In the second part, fifty further patients were randomized into two groups: 25 patients received four liters of standard solution, and 25 patients received four liters of SF-ELS. The patients' opinions regarding the preparation and their willingness to repeat the use of the same preparation were recorded by questionnaire. The quality of the colon preparation was assessed by the endoscopists. RESULTS: Seventeen patients (71%; P < 0.05) preferred SF-ELS. The compliance rate in the two groups was 96%, and the frequency of occurrence of adverse effects was also similar. Colonoscopy was completed in 24 of the 25 patients in the SF-ELS group and 22 of the 25 patients in the standard PEG group (the difference was not significant). Visualization of the mucosa in the areas explored was perfect in 20 of the 25 patients in the SF-ELS group and in 17 of the 25 patients in the PEG group (not significant). Patients had a significant preference for SF-ELS. Eighteen of the 25 patients in the SF-ELS group were willing to accept the same preparation for a further colonoscopy, compared with 11 of the 25 in the other group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Improving the acceptability of colonic preparation before colonoscopy could improve patients' compliance and the quality of the follow-up. The results of this study justify further investigation of SF-ELS.

Colonoscopy↗

PubMed1983

Endotoxaemia following colonoscopy.

In 100 consecutive patients the occurrence of bacteraemia and endotoxaemia after colonoscopy was studied. The Limulus Amoebocyte Lysate Test was used to detect endotoxaemia. No bacteraemia was detected after colonoscopy. Growth of Staph, epidermidis was considered as contamination. In 9% of the patients endotoxaemia was discovered after colonoscopy. The occurrence of endotoxaemia was found to be unrelated to the duration of the procedure, the number of the biopsies taken, or the cleansing of the bowel prior to colonoscopy. In patients with liver cirrhosis endotoxaemia occurred more often than in patients without liver disease. No clinical consequences of endotoxaemia were found in patients who developed endotoxaemia after colonoscopy. We conclude that colonoscopy is followed by endotoxaemia quite frequently. The clinical implication of these conditions, especially in patients with liver cirrhosis merits further consideration.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Conscious sedation and cardiorespiratory safety during colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: Cardiorespiratory events during colonoscopy are common. The effect of sedative premedication on cardiorespiratory parameters during colonoscopy has not been studied in controlled, prospective trials. METHODS: One hundred eighty patients undergoing colonoscopy were divided into 3 groups: (1) sedation with intravenous midazolam (midazolam group); (2) sedation with intravenous saline (placebo group); and (3) no intravenous cannula (control group). Arterial oxygen saturation (SaO(2)), systolic and diastolic blood pressure and continuous electrocardiogram were recorded prior to, during and after the endoscopic procedure. RESULTS: Midazolam produced lower SaO(2) values during colonoscopy compared with placebo or control groups (p < 0.001, repeated measures analysis of variance). Systolic and diastolic blood pressure during colonoscopy were lower in the midazolam group than in the placebo group (p < 0.01 and p < 0.05, respectively), but no difference was found between the midazolam and the control groups. Hypotension (systolic blood pressure less than 100 mm Hg) occurred more frequently in the midazolam group (19%) than in the placebo (3%; p < 0.01) or control groups (7%; p < 0.05). ST-segment depression developed in 7% of patients during the recording with no difference between the groups. In 75% of cases ST-depression appeared prior to the endoscopic procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Premedication with midazolam induced a statistically significant decrease in arterial oxygen saturation and increased the risk for hypotension. However, colonoscopy proved to be a safe procedure both with and without sedation.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

The ASGE guidelines for the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system.

BACKGROUND: Appropriateness of indications is essential to the rational utilization of resources. The aim of this study was to evaluate the appropriate use of colonoscopy in an open access system and to assess whether the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) guidelines are useful in clinical practice. METHODS: The indication for colonoscopy was assessed on 3000 consecutive examinations performed at 7 institutions. RESULTS: The rate of colonoscopies "generally not indicated" according to the ASGE guidelines was 24.5% for outpatients and 15.5% for inpatients; the rates of examinations performed for an indication not listed in the ASGE guidelines were 12% and 20.1%, respectively. Generally not indicated colonoscopies were significantly less frequent for procedures requested by gastroenterologists or family physicians than those requested by other specialists, but were similar. Most generally not indicated examinations requested by gastroenterologists were for routine follow-up of patients with inflammatory bowel disease; when these patients were excluded, the rate of generally not indicated endoscopies requested by gastroenterologists was also lower than the corresponding rate for examinations requested by family physicians. CONCLUSIONS: In Italy, the rate of colonoscopies performed for generally not indicated reasons is high, particularly among examinations not requested by a gastroenterologist. Many colonoscopies are performed for indications not listed in the ASGE guidelines.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Relaxation music decreases the dose of patient-controlled sedation during colonoscopy: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: A prospective randomized controlled trial was performed to test the hypotheses that music decreases the dose of sedative medication required for colonoscopy and that the combination of music and patient-controlled sedation improves patient acceptance of colonoscopy. METHODS: One hundred sixty-five patients scheduled to undergo elective colonoscopy were randomized to receive 1 of 3 different modes of sedation: Group 1, a combination of music and patient-controlled sedation with a mixture of propofol and alfentanil; Group 2, patient-controlled sedation alone; Group 3, music alone with diazemuls and meperidine administered intravenously if requested by the patient. Each bolus of patient-controlled sedation delivered 4.8 mg propofol and 12 microg alfentenil. Music was provided by means of a portable compact disc machine with headphones. Outcome measures assessed immediately after colonoscopy and 24 hours later included dose of patient-controlled sedation used, complications, recovery time, pain score, satisfaction score, and willingness to repeat the procedure with the same mode of sedation. RESULTS: The mean (SD) dose of propofol used in Group 1 was significantly less than Group 2 (0.84 mg/kg [0.69 mg/kg] vs. 1.15 mg/kg [0.83 mg/kg]; p = 0.02, t test). The mean (SD) satisfaction score was higher in Group 1 (7.8 [2.1]) compared with Group 2 (6.8 [2.3]) and Group 3 (7.4 [2.3]) (p = 0.05, 1-way analysis of variance). The majority of patients in Group 1 were willing to repeat the same mode of sedation when queried immediately after colonoscopy (87%) and 24 hours later (75%), which was significantly different from the corresponding results in the other 2 groups; p = 0.04 and p < 0.01 respectively, chi-square test. CONCLUSIONS: Music can decrease the dose of sedative medication required for colonoscopy. The combination of music and patient-controlled sedation was the best-accepted mode of sedation among 3 groups.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2003

Colorectal cancer detection by colonoscopy in a Swedish county, 1979-95.

BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer in Sweden, and incidence is increasing. We analysed colorectal cancer detection by colonoscopy in a defined population in Sweden. METHODS: All colonoscopy records for the period 1979-95 in one Swedish county (population 258,000) were retrieved. Information was obtained about patient demographics, date of examination, endoscopists, indications, findings, colonoscopy type and completion level. Records were linked to the Swedish Cancer Register and the Cause of Death Register. RESULTS: The majority of 2214 colorectal cancers were detected by means other than colonoscopy. In total, 192 were diagnosed and 6 were not detected by colonoscopy, with no significant differences in gender, age, indications, presence of polyps or diverticulosis, time-period or experience of the endoscopist. The mean completion rate of the endoscopist was lower in patients with undetected cancers. Coexisting inflammatory bowel disease was more common in patients with late diagnosis. Sensitivity was 97.0%, and higher when the indication was bleeding, cancer or unclear X-ray findings. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitivity in detecting colorectal cancer was high, and the proportion detected by colonoscopy increased over time. Mean completion rate was lower in patients with undetected cancers. Coexisting IBD was more common in patients with a late diagnosis.

Aged↗

PubMed1993

Double-contrast barium enema versus colonoscopy in the diagnosis of neoplastic disorders: aspects of decision-making in general practice.

A total of 190 patients, referred by general practitioners for a double-contrast barium enema, were subsequently examined with colonoscopy. With colonoscopy and histology as the reference standard, sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for the radiological detection of cancer and polyps were calculated. No cancer was overlooked by the radiological examination, but there were four false positives. The overall sensitivity for polyps was 70%, increasing to 81% for polyps > or = 10 mm. The predictive value was 93-97% for the exclusion of polyps. The caecum was reached in 187 patients by double-contrast barium enema (98%) and in 164 patients (86%) by colonoscopy. Lesions in four of 12 patients who had radiological changes were undetected at the first colonoscopy, but a repeat examination showed polyps > or = 10 mm in size. Although colonoscopy is a more sensitive technique for the detection of small mucosal lesions, the general practitioners may, in the vast majority of patients, rely on a negative result for polyps and cancer obtained by the double-contrast barium enema. The latter is linked with a number of false-positive cases, while colonoscopy is associated with technical difficulties; both techniques may lead to repeated examinations, regardless of which was the first choice.

Aged↗

PubMed2001

Remifentanil versus meperidine for monitored anesthesia care: a comparison study in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy.

UNLABELLED: Colonoscopy is one of the most frequently performed outpatient procedures in the United States. This study was designed to test the hypothesis that a remifentanil infusion would be superior to boluses of meperidine in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy. One hundred ASA physical status I-IV patients undergoing colonoscopy were randomized in this double-blinded study to receive either remifentanil infusions (n = 49) or titrated boluses of meperidine (n = 51). Patient tolerance was assessed using physiologic variables and side effects associated with opioid analgesia. Verbal pain/anxiety and patient/operator satisfaction were also assessed. As a group, the physiologic characteristics demonstrated no significant differences in the response to the colonoscopy procedure. Although the patient and operator satisfaction surveys were similar between groups, the incidences of tachycardia, hypotension, and nausea were less and the adjusted verbal pain and anxiety scores were more in the Remifentanil group compared with the Meperidine group. This study demonstrates that remifentanil and meperidine were equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider. The differences in the pharmakinetics of remifentanil and meperidine most likely account for the differences noted between the two treatment groups. IMPLICATIONS: Remifentanil infusions and meperidine boluses are equally well tolerated in older patients undergoing ambulatory colonoscopy when administered by an anesthesia provider.

Adjuvants, Anesthesia↗

PubMed2002

Terminal ileum intubation in pediatric colonoscopy and diagnostic value of conventional small bowel contrast radiography in pediatric inflammatory bowel disease.

BACKGROUND: Small bowel contrast radiography is often suggested as the first diagnostic tool in evaluating pediatric inflammatory bowel disease. The purpose of this study was to determine the sensitivity and specificity of small bowel radiography compared with terminal ileal biopsies in diagnosing pediatric inflammatory bowel disease, and to determine the success rate and safety of terminal ileum intubation during pediatric colonoscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 164 subjects who had colonoscopies with terminal ileal biopsies between 1994 and 1996. Small bowel contrast radiography was performed in 84 subjects within two weeks of the colonoscopy. We also reviewed all the colonoscopy reports from the years 1994 to 1996 and 1999 to 2000 to determine the percentage of terminal ileal intubation. RESULTS: Eighty-four subjects with small bowel contrast radiography and terminal ileal biopsies were reviewed. Using small bowel radiography as a screening test for the diagnosis of terminal ileum inflammatory bowel disease resulted in a sensitivity of 45% (17/37) and a specificity of 96% (17/19). Between the years 1994 and 1996 the percentage of pediatric colonoscopies that resulted in terminal ileal intubation was 21.5%; between the years 1999 and 2000 the percentage increased to 65.6%. CONCLUSIONS: A normal small bowel radiography alone should not be used to rule out pediatric inflammatory bowel disease when the symptoms suggest it. Colonoscopy with terminal ileal intubation is feasible and safe; it should be attempted in all children with symptoms consistent with inflammatory bowel disease.

Biopsy↗

PubMed2006

Patient-reported symptoms after pediatric outpatient colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy under general anesthesia.

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopic examination of the colon is indicated in children with diarrhea, hematochezia and suspected inflammatory bowel disease. The aim of this study was to determine the rate of patient-reported symptoms after colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy under general anesthesia in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included patients 18 years of age and younger who underwent colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy during a 1-year period. At least 30 days after the endoscopy, an interview was conducted regarding symptoms after colonoscopy or flexible sigmoidoscopy. RESULTS: Eighty-eight children were eligible, and 68 (77%) were available for follow-up. Ten (15%) reported symptoms after their endoscopy. The most common symptoms reported were diarrhea, excessive gas and sore throat. The frequency of reported symptoms was similar between colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy. The frequency of symptoms was not affected by intubation of terminal ileum, polypectomy or the number of prior colonoscopies or flexible sigmoidoscopies. CONCLUSIONS: Outpatient colonoscopy and flexible sigmoidoscopy under general anesthesia are well tolerated by children. A minority of children reports mild symptoms that spontaneously resolve.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Impact of endoscopist withdrawal speed on polyp yield: implications for optimal colonoscopy withdrawal time.

BACKGROUND: In 2002, a U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer recommended that the withdrawal phase for colonoscopy should average at least 6-10 min. This was based on 10 consecutive colonoscopies by two endoscopists with different adenoma miss rates. AIMS: To characterize the relationship between endoscopist withdrawal time and polyp detection at colonoscopy, and to determine the withdrawal time that corresponds to the median polyp detection rate. DESIGN: Procedural data from out-patient colonoscopies performed at the Mayo Clinic, Rochester during 2003 were reviewed. Endoscopists were characterized by their mean withdrawal time for a negative procedure and individual polyp detection rate. RESULTS: A total of 10 955 colonoscopies performed by 43 endoscopists were analysed. Median withdrawal time was 6.3 min (range: 4.2-11.9); polyp detection rate was 44.0% (all polyps), 29.8% (< or = 5 mm), 5.9% (6-9 mm), 6.7% (10-19 mm), 2.1% (> or = 20 mm). Longer withdrawal time was associated with higher polyp detection rate (r = 0.76; P < 0.0001); this relationship weakened for larger polyps (r = 0.19 for polyps 6-9 mm, r = 0.28 for polyps 10-19 mm, r = 0.02 for polyps > or = 20 mm). Overall median polyp detection rate corresponded to a withdrawal time of 6.7 min. CONCLUSION: Our findings support a colonoscopy withdrawal time of at least 7 min, which correlates with higher colon polyp detection rates.

Adenoma↗

PubMed2006

Survey of consent practices for inpatient colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography at a tertiary referral center.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present paper was to determine informed consent practices for inpatient, open-access colonoscopy and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) at a tertiary referral center. METHODS: A two-part prospective study incorporating (i) an audit of consent practices for colonoscopy and ERCP; and (ii) a questionnaire directed at gastroenterologists and interns regarding information imparted to patients in the process of acquiring informed consent, was undertaken at Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia. Study subjects consisted of inpatients undergoing open-access colonoscopy and/or ERCP at the study center commencing May 2003; and gastroenterologists and interns at the study center. RESULTS: Written consent was obtained by junior medical staff in 89% of cases. Response rates for the questionnaire was 100% from interns, and 91% from gastroenterologists. Of interns surveyed, 93% had witnessed a colonoscopy, and 59% had witnessed an ERCP. For 12% of interns, colonoscopic bleeding or perforation were not always mentioned. Colonoscopy failure rate and perforation were overestimated by 51% and 63% of interns, respectively. Only 56% of interns always mentioned pancreatitis as a complication of ERCP. The rate of post-ERCP pancreatitis was overestimated by 25% of interns. Only 40% of gastroenterologists always provided additional information to patients whose consent was obtained by someone else. Written material was not routinely provided for patients. Consent was usually obtained on the day of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Written consent for inpatients undergoing open-access colonoscopy and ERCP is rarely obtained by the proceduralist. There is substantial variability in the information provided to patients. Guidelines are required to ensure best practice in this area.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2006

Appropriateness of colonoscopy using the ASGE guidelines: experience in a large Asian hospital.

BACKGROUND: The is currently a heavy burden on endoscopy services worldwide and although guidelines for the appropriate use of esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) have been well studied, there are few such studies with respect to colonoscopy and none for the Asia-Pacific region. This study aimed, firstly, to determine the 'appropriateness of colonoscopy' for procedures performed in the endoscopy unit of a large Asian hospital using the American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) 2000 guidelines, and secondly, to determine predictive factors including 'appropriateness of colonoscopy' for positive findings and colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: A prospective cross-sectional study was carried out on consecutive colonoscopies performed in the University of Malaya Medical Center. The unit has an open-access endoscopy policy for doctors who work in the hospital. Referrals were from endoscopists (gastroenterologists and surgeon-endoscopists), primary care physicians and other specialists. The indication of a procedure referral was recorded and judged 'appropriate' or 'inappropriate' using the ASGE criteria. The colonoscopic findings were recorded and classified as positive (endoscopies showing any pathology that had direct therapeutic or prognostic consequences) or negative findings (endoscopies showing no pathology or minor pathologies). Predictive factors for positive findings and CRC were determined using multivariate analysis. RESULTS: Of 380 patients referred for colonoscopy, 220 (57.9%) were classified as appropriate according to the ASGE guidelines, and 49 (12.9%) as inappropriate. The remaining 111 patients (29.2%) presented with complaints and conditions that could not be categorized. The rate of appropriate referral was similar for all three categories of physician (endoscopists: 59.8%, primary care physicians: 48.1%, others: 51.1%). When referrals by endoscopists were substratified according to gastroenterologists and surgeon-endoscopists, the rate of appropriate referral among gastroenterologists (78.4%) was significantly higher than that of surgeon-endoscopists (56.1%) (P = 0.049), primary care physicians (P = 0.013) and 'others' (P = 0.009). The most common appropriate indications were unexplained Rectalbleeding (79 cases, 20.8%) followed by CRC surveillance (45 cases, 11.8%). The most common inappropriate indication was inappropriately timed colonic cancer surveillance (32 cases, 8.4%). Chronic constipation in 36 cases (9.5%) was the most common 'unlisted' indication. A positive colonoscopic finding was detected in 131 (34.5%) examinations and CRC was found in 36 patients (9.5%). Appropriateness of indication was not a predictive factor for positive findings or CRC and there was no difference in the proportion of cases with positive findings or CRC in the three 'appropriateness categories'. Multivariate analysis revealed that only Rectalbleeding and smoking were significant independent positive predictive factors for positive findings and CRC. CONCLUSION: The appropriateness of colonoscopy was not high among the different sources of referrals except for the subgroup of 'gastroenterologist'. Furthermore, the rates of positive findings and CRC among the cases with appropriate, inappropriate and unlisted indications did not differ. The ASGE guidelines will need to be modified for Asia to be of practical use.

Adult↗

PubMed2001

A randomized controlled trial of total colonic decompression after colonoscopy to improve patient comfort.

OBJECTIVES: Bloating occurring after colonoscopy may cause significant discomfort in some patients. We sought to determine whether total colonic decompression decreased bloating and improved comfort after colonoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive outpatients undergoing elective colonoscopy were randomized to total colonic decompression or to the control group after completion of the routine colonoscopy. The colonoscope was advanced again to the cecum and the air aspirated during withdrawal in patients randomized to decompression and the procedure was terminated without decompression in control patients. Pain and bloating was assessed in the recovery room and in 24-48 h using a five-point scale. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were randomized to decompression and 61 were randomized to the control group. The baseline demographic and procedural characteristics were similar between the two groups, but decompression took significantly longer (median, 17 min vs 14 min, p = 0.0002). Seventy-five percent of the decompression group and 80% of the control group denied any pain during colonoscopy. Significantly fewer patients from the decompression group complained of bloating after the procedure (25% vs 59%, p < 0.001) when questioned in the recovery room. However, comparable patients complained of postprocedure bloating when questioned in 24-48 h after the procedure (45% of decompression group vs 47% of control group, p = 0.86). The nurse and the endoscopist were poor at predicting the patient's bloating and significantly overestimated the level of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Total colonic decompression does not significantly reduce bloating after colonoscopy when assessed 24-48 h after the procedure.

Abdominal Pain↗

PubMed2001

Computed tomographic colonography and conventional colonoscopy for colon diseases: a prospective, blinded study.

OBJECTIVES: Computed tomographic (CT) colonography or virtual colonoscopy is a new diagnostic method for the colon and rectum, developed on the basis of spiral computed axial tomography and employing virtual reality technology. The aim of this study was to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic accuracy of CT colonography compared with colonoscopy in a prospective, blinded study in one single institution in Italy. METHODS: Ninety-nine patients randomly selected among those attending the open-access endoscopy unit for diagnostic colonoscopy underwent colonoscopy and spiral CT. The images obtained were transmitted to generate the virtual colonoscopy pictures. A supervisor compared the results with the findings of conventional colonoscopy. RESULTS: CT colonography diagnosed seven of eight tumors, one being missed because the patient had been inadequately prepared. In 28 patients, CT colonography identified 26 polyps of 45 (57.8% sensitivity, 92.6% specificity, 86.7% positive predictive value), regardless of their size. The sensitivity in detecting colonic polyps was 31.8% (7/22) in the first 25 cases and 91.6% (11/12) in the last 20 patients. CT colonography missed one flat adenoma, some angioectasias and colonic lesions because of portal hypertension in one patient, Crohn's disease ulcers in two patients, and ulcerative colitis lesions in three. CONCLUSIONS: CT colonography shows poor sensitivity for identifying colonic polyps and does not always detect neoplastic lesions. Flat lesions are impossible to see by this method.

Colonic Diseases↗

PubMed2001

Usefulness of colonoscopy with biopsy in the evaluation of patients with chronic diarrhea.

OBJECTIVE: Patients referred for chronic diarrhea frequently undergo endoscopic evaluation. There are limited data on the role for colonoscopy with biopsy and ileoscopy for patients with chronic diarrhea. METHODS: We reviewed the charts of 228 patients with chronic diarrhea evaluated by colonoscopy between November 1995 and March 1998. Chronic diarrhea was defined as loose, frequent bowel movements for a minimum of 4 wk. Patients were excluded if biopsies were not performed in normal colons, if they had undergone previous bowel surgery, a history of inflammatory bowel disease, HIV, or an inadequate colonoscopy. RESULTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients were included in the analysis, of whom 142 (85%) had ileoscopy. Colonoscopy and biopsy yielded a specific histological diagnosis in 52 (31%) patients. These included Crohn's disease (9), ulcerative colitis (7), lymphocytic colitis (10), collagenous colitis (3), ischemic colitis (3), infectious colitis (6), and miscellaneous diseases (14). Ileoscopy yielded significant findings in 3% of patients (four with Crohn's disease and one with infection). CONCLUSIONS: Colonoscopy and biopsy is useful in the investigation of patients with chronic diarrhea yielding a histological diagnosis in 31% of patients without a previous diagnosis. Ileoscopy complemented colonoscopy findings in a minority of patients with chronic diarrhea and was essential for a diagnosis in only two patients.

Adult↗

PubMed2002

Long term outcome of patients with active Crohn's disease exhibiting extensive and deep ulcerations at colonoscopy.

OBJECTIVE: Prediction of the clinical course of Crohn's disease (CD) is difficult in the long term. Our aim was to determine whether the presence of severe endoscopic lesions (SELs) may predict a higher risk of colectomy and penetrating complications. METHODS: All patients at our institution with active ileocoIonic CD who had colonoscopies between 1990 and 1996 were included in the study. SELs were defined as extensive and deep ulcerations covering more than 10% of the mucosal area of at least one segment of the colon. RESULTS: Among the 102 patients included, 53 had SELs at index colonoscopy. During the follow-up (median = 52 months), 37 patients underwent colonic resection. Probabilities of colectomy at 1, 3, and 8 yr were 20%, 26%, and 42%. Risk of colectomy was independently affected by the presence of SELs at index colonoscopy (relative risk [RR] = 5.43, 95% CI = 2.64-11.18), a Crohn's Disease Activity Index level greater than 288 (RR = 2.21, 95% CI = 1.09-4.47), and the absence of immunosuppressive therapy during the follow-up (RR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.20-5.00). Probabilities of colectomy were, respectively, 31% and 6% at 1 yr, 42% and 8% at 3 yr, and 62% and 18% at 8 yr in patients with and without SELs. We performed a second analysis excluding the 14 patients operated on within the 3 months after the index colonoscopy: presence of SELs remained the only significant factor predictive of colectomy (RR = 6.72, 95% CI = 2.26-20.03). All six patients with penetrating complications during the follow-up had SELs at index colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with CD exhibiting deep and extensive ulcerations at colonoscopy have a more aggressive clinical course with an increased rate of penetrating complications and surgery.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Colonoscopy in octogenarians: a prospective outpatient study.

OBJECTIVES: The number of octogenarians (age > or =80 yr) referred for colonoscopy is increasing. Reported success rates regarding colonoscopy completion and adequacy of colonic preparation are poor overall in this group. This may be the result of age-related differences or biases due to retrospective data. The aims of this study were to prospectively determine differences between octogenarians and nonoctogenarians in adequacy of colonic preparation, success in completing colonoscopy, and complications of conscious sedation. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of 250 consecutive outpatients (150 nonoctogenarians and 100 octogenarians) referred for colonoscopy. Colonic preparation tolerance was assessed before colonoscopy, and the success rate and preparation were evaluated after the procedure. Conscious sedation complications were compared. RESULTS: In octogenarians and nonoctogenarians preparation tolerance (86% and 90%, respectively) was similar. Endoscopic success rate was slightly lower in octogenarians (90% vs 99%, p = 0.002). Preparation was poor in 16% of octogenarians compared with 4% of nonoctogenarians (p = 0.001). This was independent of the type of preparation used. Oxygen desaturation was more common in octogenarians (27% vs 19%, p = 0.0007) and associated with a higher meperidine dose (1.05 vs 0.75 mg/kg). No adverse outcomes occurred in either study group. CONCLUSIONS: Colonic preparations were well tolerated and colonoscopic success rates were high in octogenarians and nonoctogenarians. However, poor colonic preparation was four times as likely in octogenarians and was the most important impediment to adequate colonoscopy.

Age Factors↗