PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Neoadjuvant therapy”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1999

[Histopathological effect and its predictors of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy by combined androgen blockade].

OBJECTIVES: Combined androgen blockade (CAB) uning LH-RH agonist and flutamide has been performed as neoadjuvant therapy for T 2, 3 prostate cancers (CaP). The histological effects of neoadjuvant CAB therapy and influential factors were investigated. METHODS: Materials were 20 CaP cases which were underwent radical prostatectomy (RP) after neoadjuvant CAB therapy. All cases were diagnosed by echo-guided sextant needle biopsies. RP was performed after serum PSA was decreased to undetectable level. Histological effect was evaluated by general rule for clinical and pathological studies on prostate cancer (Japanese Urological Association). All cases were divided 2 groups by histological effects as follows: Group A (poor effect group): G 0 and G 1, Group B (good effect group): G 2 and G 3. Immunostaining of p 53 (mutant type), bcl-2 and Chromogranin A (ChA) were performed for both pretreatment needle biopsy and RP specimen. In addition, pretreatment serum PSA and Gleason grade were also investigated. RESULTS: Down grading were found in 30%. Down staging were found in 35% (7 cases). All 7 cases were negative surgical margins and 5 of 7 were clinical T 3. Negative bcl-2 of biopsy specimen was correlation with down grading (p = 0.008). In the histopathological evaluation, G 0 was 1, G 1 were 10, G 2 were 6 and G 3 were 3 cases. Gleason 4 or 5 elements of biopsy were found in 9/11 cases in Group A but only 3/9 cases in Group B (p = 0.027). The bcl-2 positive cells of biopsy were found in 8/11 cases in Group A but only 1/9 cases in Group B (p = 0.006). The p 53 and/or bcl-2 positive cells of biopsy were found in 10/11 cases in Group A but only 3/9 cases in Group B (p = 0.007). Serum PSA and ChA were not correlation with histological effect of neoadjuvant CAB therapy. But, in 3 cases, ChA positive cell appeared after neoadjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: We could not expect more than 50% cases to show the down grading and down staging. But, in T 3 case, surgical failure could be decrease. We could expect prostate cancer cases without positive bcl-2 cells, p 53 over expression and Gleason 4 x 5 to reveal the good histological effects of neoadjuvant CAB therapy.

Androgen Antagonists↗
PubMed2001

High-dose radiation therapy and neoadjuvant plus concomitant chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin in patients with locally advanced squamous-cell anal canal cancer: final results of a phase II study.

PURPOSE: To analyse toxicity and response to a new scheme of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) and concomitant radiochemotherapy (RT-CT) for locally advanced anal canal squamous-cell carcinoma (ACC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty patients with an ACC > 40 mm and/or with lymph node involvement were included (1 T1, 52 T2, 14 T3, 13 T4, 18 N0, 30 N1, 32 N2-N3). Two cycles of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) and CDDP were delivered as neoadjuvant CT and two during RT-CT. Pelvic (+/- inguinal) RT delivered 45 Gy in 25 fractions of 1.8 Gy. Involved fields were boosted after a one to two month gap (15-20 Gy). The median follow-up was 29 months. RESULTS: One patient died of a pulmonary embolism on day 4. All patients received the entire treatment, with reduced 5-FU doses in 27% of the cases because of acute toxicity. Sixty-four grade 3 and five grade 4 toxicities were observed. No toxic death occurred. Complete response (CR) and partial response (PR) rates were, respectively, 10% and 51% after neoadjuvant CT, 67% and 28% after RT-CT and 93% and 5% after treatment completion (including 4 abdomino-perineal resections). The three-year actuarial overall, tumour-specific, colostomy-free, relapse-free, disease-free and event-free survivals were 86%, 88%, 73%, 70%, 67% and 63%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Tolerance was good. After neoadjuvant CT, most of the patients were objective responders. After treatment completion, all but five achieved CR. The long-term results confirm the durability of local control and low toxicity on the sphincter. An ongoing phase III intergroup trial analyses the impact of neoadjuvant CT, and the benefit of a high-dose boost irradiation, on local control and colostomy-free survival.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

[A case of small cell carcinoma in the urinary bladder responding to gemcitabine/cisplatin combination therapy as neoadjuvant chemotherapy].

We report a case of primary small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder. A 79-year-old man with the chief complaints of macrohematuria and pollakisuria was admitted to our hospital. Cystoscopy and computed tomography (CT) revealed a non-papillary broad-based bladder tumor. Histological diagnosis was small cell carcinoma of the urinary bladder, and he underwent 3 courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy including gemcitabine and cisplatin with a preoperative diagnosis of cT3bN0M0. After the chemotherapy, cystoscopy and CT showed complete remission. Total cystectomy with ileal conduit was performed following 3 courses of chemotherapy. Microscopic examination revealed that the small cell carcinoma had disappeared and the converted squamous cell carcinoma remained only in a small part of the specimens. The patient was carefully followed for 10 months after operation, with no tumor recurrence.

Aged↗
PubMed2002

Neoadjuvant gemcitabine therapy for breast cancer.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy has become a standard treatment in the management of locally advanced breast cancer. Patients with earlier-stage disease may also benefit from neoadjuvant treatment in terms of improved rates of breast-conserving surgery and thus better quality of life. Gemcitabine is a pyrimidine analogue that has shown activity in a variety of solid tumors, a good toxicity profile, and nonoverlapping toxicity with other chemotherapeutic agents. Several phase II/III studies are assessing gemcitabine combined with anthracyclines, taxanes, and/or vinorelbine both in the neoadjuvant and metastatic disease settings. This article reviews developments in neoadjuvant use of gemcitabine in combination with anthracyclines and taxanes. Several phase II trials of gemcitabine combined with doxorubicin/epirubicin or with doxorubicin/paclitaxel have been carried out. Preliminary findings demonstrate increased complete response rates and good tolerability of these regimens in patients with breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed1994

[The significance of intra-arterial infusion therapy for neoadjuvant chemotherapy].

Arterial infusion therapy with anticancer drugs is now attracting attention as a valuable modality for locally advanced breast cancer. Since 1977, we have used this therapy in 122 patients with primary breast cancer. The present report mainly discusses the clinical and histological response as well as the prognosis. The anticancer drugs were mainly given by two routes, infusion into the internal mammary artery and the subclavian artery. Continuous infusion of 5-FU and intermittent injections of MMC, ADR, 4'-epi-ADR and THP-ADR were jointly or individually made in each artery. Clinical response, defined as CR + PR, was noted in 48.4% of 5-FU group and 72.7% of ADR-MMC group. Histological response according to Shimosato Criteria, defined as grade IIb or better, appeared in 45.2% of main tumors and 25.4% of metastatic lymph nodes in the 5-FU group, and 70.9% main tumors and 46.3% of metastatic lymph nodes in the ADR-MMC group. The non-infusion group contained 27.7% of stage IIIb, against 72.2% in the infusion group. The 5-year overall survival rates were non-infusion group 62%, 5-FU group 34.1% and ADR-MMC group 66.2%. A significant difference was seen between the 5-FU infusion group and the ADR-MMC group (p = 0.03). Administration of high dose medroxy progesterone acetate for two weeks and 4'-epi-ADR infusion chemotherapy resulted in an excellent histological response. This combination therapy is a promising neoadjuvant chemo-endocrine therapy for advanced breast cancer.

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols↗
PubMed2005

A comparison of sentinel node biopsy before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy: timing is important.

BACKGROUND: Because neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being used more frequently, the optimal timing of sentinel node biopsy (SNB) remains controversial. We previously evaluated the predictive value of SNB before neoadjuvant chemotherapy in clinically node-negative breast cancer. Our identification rate of the sentinel node among 52 patients before chemotherapy with a mean tumor size of 4 cm was 100%. In this study, we compared the identification rates of SNB before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and evaluated the false-negative rate of SNB after chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective institutional database review identified 36 women who underwent SNB after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer from 1999 to 2004. The initial clinical tumor size and lymph node status, SNB pathology, axillary lymph node dissection pathology, and residual pathologic tumor size were reviewed. RESULTS: Sixteen of 36 patients had a clinically negative axilla before neoadjuvant therapy. SNB after neoadjuvant therapy was successful in 29 patients (80.6%), although 7 patients did not map (19.4%). Six of the 7 patients who failed to map had a clinically positive axilla initially. Axillary disease was found in 6 of 7 of these patients at dissection (85.7%). Of the 29 patients who mapped successfully, 13 (45%) were SNB negative, and 16 (55%) were SNB positive. Of the 13 SNB-negative patients, 2 had a positive axillary lymph node dissection, yielding a false-negative rate of 11%. Thirteen patients who mapped had a clinically positive axilla before therapy (45%). Of the 11 patients with true-negative SNBs, 7 (64%) were clinically node negative at presentation. The initial tumor sizes on examination ranged from 2 to 9 cm (mean, 5.0 cm), and residual pathologic tumor sizes ranged from 0 to 6 cm (mean, 1.8 cm). Failure to map correlated with a clinically positive axilla at presentation (100% vs 45%) but did not correlate with initial tumor size. CONCLUSIONS: Sentinel node identification rates are significantly better when mapping is performed before neoadjuvant chemotherapy (100% vs 80.6%), with failure to map correlated with clinically positive nodal disease at presentation and residual disease at axillary lymph node dissection. Among patients who map successfully after chemotherapy, the false-negative rate is high (11%). Given these findings, we currently recommend SNB before neoadjuvant chemotherapy for clinically node-negative patients, and raise concerns about the use of SNB after neoadjuvant therapy in patients with an initially clinically positive axilla.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed2006

Presence of apoptotic and nonapoptotic disseminated tumor cells reflects the response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NST) is an established strategy to reduce tumor size in breast cancer patients prior to breast-conserving therapy. The effect of NST on tumor cell dissemination in these patients is not known. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of disseminated tumor cells (DTC), including apoptotic DTC, in breast cancer patients after NST, and to investigate the correlation of DTC status with therapy response. METHODS: Bone marrow aspiration was performed in 157 patients after NST. DTC were detected by immunocytochemistry using the A45-B/B3 anticytokeratin antibody. To detect apoptotic DTC the antibody M30 (Roche Diagnostics, Germany) was used, which detects a neo-epitope expressed only after caspase cleavage of cytokeratin 18 during early apoptosis. RESULTS: The incidence of DTC in breast cancer patients was 53% after completion of NST. Tumor dissemination was observed more frequently in patients with no change/progressive disease (69%) than in patients with partial remission or complete remission of the primary tumor (46%) (P < 0.05). Ten out of 24 patients with complete remission, however, were still bone marrow positive. Apoptotic DTC were present in 36 of 157 (23%) breast cancer patients. Apoptotic cells only were detected in 14% of the patients with partial remission or complete remission, but were detected in just 5% of the patients with stable disease. Apoptotic DTC were detectable in none of the patients with tumor progression. CONCLUSION: The pathological therapy response in breast cancer patients is reflected by the presence of apoptotic DTC. Patients with complete remission, however, may still have nonapoptotic DTC. These patients may also benefit from secondary adjuvant therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents↗
PubMed1995

[Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy prior to nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy in patients with stage T2 prostatic cancer].

Radical prostatectomy is the effective treatment for clinical T2 prostatic cancer. However, clinical T2 stage is often understaged preoperatively. The objective of neoadjuvant therapy is to increase the curability of surgery to understaged patients. The present study was based on patients who had had neoadjuvant endocrine therapy (LH-RH agonist) prior to radical nerve-sparing prostatectomy for T2 prostatic cancer. Sexual function were estimated before and after surgery. Ten patients with a mean age of 64.6 years (range 57-71 years) and biopsy-proven cancer received this treatment modality. No patients had evidence of lymph node metastasis by the pelvic computerized tomography and their bone scan was negative for metastasis. Clinical stage was T2a in 3 patients and T2b in 7. The grade of these tumors as assessed on prostatic biopsy before neoadjuvant endocrine treatment was well differentiated in 3 and moderately differentiated in 7. The duration of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy was 3.6 months (range 2-5 months) in average. Serum levels of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) were examined monthly and prostate volume was measured by transrectal ultrasonography before and after neoadjuvant treatment. Decrease in serum PSA values was observed from an average level of 8.6 ng/ml (range 3.1-17.5 ng/ml) determined prior to neoadjuvant treatment to an average of 1.1 ng/ml (range 0.6-3.3 ng/ml) determined after neoadjuvant treatment. An average reduction of prostatic volume was 25.3% (range 7.4-56.7%) after neoadjuvant therapy. Pathological effects of the neoadjuvant therapy by the criteria proposed by Japanese Urological Association were Grade (G) 0a in 3 patients, G0b in 4, G1 in 2 and G2 in 1. Of patients who had 10 stage T2 cancer before treatment, 4 had pT2 and 6 pT3.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2000

Long-term neoadjuvant hormone therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: evaluation of risk for biochemical recurrence at 5-year follow-up.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of 8 months of neoadjuvant therapy on pathologic stage and biochemical recurrence rates. METHODS: One hundred fifty-six men with clinically localized prostate cancer were treated with neoadjuvant combined androgen withdrawal therapy for 8 months prior to radical prostatectomy. Preoperative clinical stage, Gleason score, and serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels were compared with treatment outcome (pathologic stage and PSA recurrence). RESULTS: PSA at diagnosis was 10 microg/L or higher in 36% with a mean of 11.5 microg/L. Clinical stage was T1c in 18%, T2 in 74%, and T3a in 8%. Gleason score was 6 or lower in 76% and 7 or higher in 24%. Pathologic stage was T0 in 13%, T2 in 66%, T3 (specimen confined) in 13%, T3 (margin positive) in 6%, and TxN+ in 2%. Incidence of positive margins increased with clinical stage T3a versus organ-confined disease (25% versus 4%, P <0.05), pretreatment Gleason scores 7 or higher versus Gleason scores 6 or lower (11% versus 4%, P = NS), and pretreatment PSA levels higher than 10 microg/L compared with PSA levels lower than 10 microg/L (15% versus 0%, P <0.01). Overall PSA recurrence rate was 12.2% after a mean postoperative follow-up of 54 months. Risk of PSA recurrence increased with clinical stage (25% T3 versus 11% organ confined, P <0.01), pretreatment PSA (7% if PSA lower than 10 microg/L versus 21% if 10 microg/L or higher, P <0.02), Gleason score (9% if 6 or lower versus 22% if 7 or higher, P <0.02), and pathologic stage (6% of pT2, 24% of pT3M-, and 56% of pT3M+, P <0.01). PSA recurrences occurred in 6% of patients with no adverse preoperative risk factors, 12% with any one of the high-risk factors, and 29% with any two of the high-risk factors. CONCLUSIONS: Risk of PSA recurrence after 8 months of neoadjuvant therapy is low after 5 years of follow-up and remains proportional to the presence of adverse preoperative risk factors. Prospective randomized studies are required to determine whether longer duration of neoadjuvant therapy reduces the risk of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy of breast cancer: a surgical perspective.

Neoadjuvant treatment with chemotherapy or endocrine agents is being used increasingly to downstage locally advanced and large operable breast cancers. Following these treatments, inoperable breast cancer often becomes fully resectable, and initially operable tumours requiring mastectomy may be successfully removed by breast-conserving surgery. Patient selection is important to optimise neoadjuvant endocrine therapy: only patients with oestrogen receptor (ER)-rich breast cancer are candidates, and postmenopausal women are likely to benefit the most. Such patients can expect a high probability of responses over a 3-month treatment period. Response to therapy should be monitored by clinical examination as well as by ultrasound, mammography, or other imaging procedures. Third-generation aromatase inhibitors (letrozole, anastrozole and exemestane) are more effective than tamoxifen in this treatment setting. In a large randomised trial of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy in postmenopausal women, letrozole achieved significantly higher response rates than tamoxifen, and a correspondingly higher rate of breast-conserving surgery was possible in the letrozole-treated patients. There is some evidence to suggest that the nature of the tumour response is different for preoperative endocrine therapy compared with chemotherapy. This difference may result in a higher rate of complete tumour excisions following breast-conserving surgery after neoadjuvant endocrine treatment. There appears to be a low rate of subsequent local recurrence in patients having breast-conserving therapy after neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1994

A prospective randomized trial for treating stages B2 and C prostate cancer: radical surgery or irradiation with neoadjuvant endocrine therapy.

A randomized clinical trial of neoadjuvant endocrine therapy followed by either surgery or irradiation and a resumption of endocrine therapy for stages B2 and C prostate cancer has been in progress since 1989. A hundred patients entered the trial between 1989 and 1993, and 95 cases were evaluated. Forty-six patients received surgery and 49 were treated with irradiation. Neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for two months resulted in prostate shrinkage and prostate specific antigen lowering. Except for two patients, one dying of a progression of disease and the other of another concurrent cancer, all are alive with an average follow-up term of 25 (range 3-53) months. The good prognostic results obtained from both treatment groups at present seem to be due in part to the neoadjuvant endocrine therapy; but in order to reach a final conclusion further comparisons need to be made.

Aged↗
PubMed2005

Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy for rectal adenocarcinoma is mediated by p53-dependent and caspase 8-dependent apoptotic pathways.

BACKGROUND: We tested the hypothesis that rectal tumors are most responsive to neoadjuvant therapy if they possess p53 and/or caspase 8 activity. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty patients diagnosed with biopsy-proven rectal cancer underwent neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy consisting of 5-fluorouracil (300 mg/m(2) daily) and radiation (4,500 cGy). Endorectal ultrasonography was performed before and after neoadjuvant therapy along with digital rectal examination and/or sigmoidoscopy for staging purposes and to evaluate response to therapy. All patients underwent resection with specimens submitted for gross and microscopic review. Pretreatment biopsy specimens were subjected to immunohistochemical staining for mutated p53 and caspase 8 bioactivity. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 32 men and 18 women. There were 17 complete responses (CRs; 34%), 17 partial responses (PRs; 34%), and 16 cases of no response (NR; 32%). There were 10 stage I tumors (20%), 22 stage II tumors (44%), and 18 stage III tumors (36%) in the cohort at the time of initial diagnosis. p53 protein staining (ie, mutated p53) was positive in 31 tumors (62%; CR, n = 8; PR, n = 11; NR, n = 12); caspase 8 positivity was apparent in 30 specimens (60%; CR, n = 13; PR, n = 13; NR, n = 4). In terms of pretreatment predictions, we scored 3 separate levels of response (CR, 3; PR, 2; NR, 1) and compared them with the expected responses (ie, p53 positivity and caspase 8 negativity should yield NR, whereas all other combinations should yield responses). Wilcoxon 2-sample tests yielded a 1-sided P value of 0.007. CONCLUSION: The present study highlights a possible mechanism for tumor response to neoadjuvant manipulation, namely that dual mechanisms for apoptotic cell death are working in concert to cause tumor regression; one is p53 transcription-dependent, and the other is p53 transcription-independent.

Adenocarcinoma↗
PubMed2004

Role of endocrine therapy in the neoadjuvant surgical setting.

Most neoadjuvant (preoperative) therapy of breast cancer has involved the use of chemotherapy, but primary endocrine therapy has also been shown to be effective in postmenopausal women with estrogen receptor-positive tumors. Neoadjuvant therapy can reduce tumor volume, permitting surgery for otherwise inoperable tumors or allowing breast-conserving surgery rather than mastectomy for operable tumors. The preoperative treatment setting also allows for assessment and comparison of responses to different agents, which may then be used in the adjuvant therapy setting following surgery. Since tumor biopsies can be obtained before, during, and after preoperative therapy, the relationship between biomarkers and response or resistance to surgery can be investigated. In the Edinburgh Breast Unit, neoadjuvant endocrine therapy with aromatase inhibitors has been more successful than with tamoxifen. Recurrence rates following preoperative endocrine therapy and breast-conserving surgery have been acceptably low, provided that radiation therapy was also administered postoperatively. Both the probability of response to neoadjuvant letrozole or tamoxifen and the degree of tumor shrinkage increased as estrogen receptor expression increased, consistent with the results of other studies. Attempts to identify biomarkers of response to neoadjuvant endocrine therapy are under way, with early indications that reduced cell proliferation 14 days after initiation of treatment correlates with responses to tamoxifen.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2005

[Radical prostatectomy with neoadjuvant hormone therapy for cT3 prostate cancer].

The efficacy of neoadjuvant hormone therapy and radical prostatectomy for cT1-2 prostate cancer have been reported to be negative from some randomized prospective studies. On the other hand, radical prostatectomy alone for cT3 prostate cancer is understood as out of indication because of high rate of positive surgical margin and PSA failure. Several investigators have examined the role of neoadjuvant hormone therapy before radical prostatectomy for cT3 prostate cancer to improve outcome. This document was reviewed the literature whether neoadjuvant hormone therapy is beneficial or not, for organ confined prostate cancer and for locally advanced prostate cancer, and presented our extended resection of prostate with neoadjuvant hormone therapy is improved the results in cT3 prostate cancer.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed2002

[Clinicopathological significance of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy: whole section analysis].

We investigated whether the histopathological effect (cell viability) of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment before radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer is involved in the biochemical outcome, i.e., androgen independency. Non-randomized prospective trial was carried out between September 1996 and April 2001 involving the patients with clinical stage T1-3 prostate cancer, including 62 who underwent radical prostatectomy after receiving neoadjuvant hormonal treatment for an average of 6.3 months and 76 who underwent radical prostectomy only. All resected specimens were histopathologically diagnosed by whole section analysis. The patients receiving neoadjuvant hormonal treatment were categorized into 4 groups according to the histological change in the resected prostate. There were 8 patients in G0 (all viable cells), 11 patients in G1 (more than 50% viable cells), 26 patients G2 (more than 50% non-viable cells) and 17 patients in G3 (no cancer cells). No difference in the patient background (prostate specific antigen, stage, Gleason score, positive core Nr, duration of neoadjuvant therapy) was observed in any group, except for the duration of (p < 0.05). Multivariate hazards analyses revealed that only the duration of neoadjuvant hormonal treatment was independently associated with excellent responders with grade 3 histological effect. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical operation resulted in various histopathological changes in the prostate, but it is not clear whether the histological effects of hormonal treatment might be involved in the outcome. A longer follow-up randomized prospective trial is necessary.

Analysis of Variance↗
PubMed2001

[Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for prostate cancer].

There have been expectations that neoadjuvant hormonal therapy would decrease the rate of positive surgical margins and, therefore, to improve the patient's survival rate after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. A review of seven prospective randomized studies for clinically localized prostate cancer revealed a significant decrease in the positive surgical margin rate in cases of clinical T2 disease after neoadjuvant hormonal therapy with prostatectomy. However, this treatment did not alter the rate of seminal vesicle invasion or lymph node metastasis after radical prostatectomy. There was no difference in operative blood loss, operating time, complication rate or hospital stay between patients treated with neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and controls. Furthermore, there was no improvement in prostate specific antigen-free survival rate after a maximum of 4 years follow-up. Further research is required to determine the optimal duration of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and whether this therapy increases the survival rate. Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy before radical prostatectomy is not supported by any outcome at this point and its use remains in the investigational stage.

Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal↗
PubMed1994

Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy and radical prostatectomy for clinical stage C carcinoma of the prostate.

OBJECTIVE: To determine whether hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy (neoadjuvant hormonal therapy) leads to improved results in patients with stage C prostate cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirty patients received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy for stage C carcinoma of the prostate. Eighteen patients who responded to treatment subsequently underwent extirpative surgery. RESULTS: Fourteen of the 30 patients (47%) were diagnosed as being downstaged to clinical stage B disease following therapy. No major complications occurred. Pathology staging revealed only three patients (10%) to have organ-confined disease after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant hormonal therapy prior to radical prostatectomy offers little probability of rendering patients with clinical stage C carcinoma of the prostate free of disease. Further investigation of the efficacy of this treatment should be accomplished in randomized trials.

Adenocarcinoma↗