PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Organisms, Genetically Modified”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed2002

Sensitive dependencies and separation distances for genetically modified herbicide-tolerant crops.

The amount of land available for the coexistent growing of both organic and genetically modified herbicide-tolerant (GMHT) crops depends on the separation distance between the two types of crop. The form of the decline in the proportion of land available for growing one of these crop types due to increasing separation distance is linear on a suitable scale, but with a slope and intercept that are sensitively dependent on the proportion of the other crop already present. Spatially explicit simulations from realistic scenarios indicate that a major increase in separation distances, currently under review by the UK government, may have serious implications for the future coexistence of organic and GMHT crops in the UK.

Computer Simulation↗
PubMed2004

Playing catch-up.

Explore the source record for details and available documents.

Biotechnology↗
PubMed2006

Pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry of rhizodeposits - a new approach to identify potential effects of genetically modified plants on soil organisms.

The objectives of the present study were (1) to investigate the qualitative composition of rhizodeposits leached from soils cropped with non-transgenic and genetically modified (GM) potatoes, and disclose if there were GM-specific modifications in potato rhizodeposition, and (2) to compare these results with conventional bulk parameters of microbial activity in soil. We have raised potatoes from a non-transgenic line (Solanum tuberosum L. cv. Désirée) and three GM lines, which expressed a gene for the resistance to kanamycin (DLH 9000) and a gene for T4 lysozyme (DL10 and DL12). A sandy soil placed in 340 cm3-"CombiSart" containers was used, from which the rhizodeposit was leached after a six-week growth period. The freeze-dried leachates were analyzed by pyrolysis-field ionization mass spectrometry (Py-FIMS). The Py-FI mass spectra gave detailed molecular-chemical information about the composition of leachates, indicating that the potato growth generally altered the composition of the soil solution. Moreover, a principal component analysis of the mass spectra showed differences between the leachates from the non-transgenic parent line and the GM potatoes as well as among the latter group. However, these differences in molecular composition could not be assigned to the release of T4-lysozyme into soil. Dehydrogenase activity and substrate-induced soil respiration as more common bulk parameters of soil microbial activity failed to disclose any significant effects of the various potatoes grown. The limitations of the described rhizodeposit leaching and analysis for risk assessment of GM potato cropping under field conditions are discussed critically. However, it could be concluded that the Py-FI mass spectrometric "fingerprint" can be developed as a fast, comprehensive, highly sensitive and reproducible analytical approach to discern any effects GM-crops may exert on soil ecological parameters.

Animals↗
PubMed2003

Lung transplantation. Xenotransplantation.

The continued and growing success of lung allotransplantation has intensified the worldwide shortage of donor organs. Yet, xenotransplantation remains a daunting challenge. Additional molecular incompatibilities and unforeseen complications will continue to be discovered. Progress has been made, notably on the generation of alpha-Gal double knockout pigs. Progressive increases in organ survival times have been seen for most organs after significant investments of time and money. The lung continues to be an organ with the lowest supply of cadaveric donors and the least potential for expanded living donation or mechanical alternatives. As such, the impetus for xenotransplantation is strong. The lung appears to be exquisitely sensitive to xenograft rejection and resistant to strategies that have been moderately successful in other organs. A complex program involving genetically modified donor organs, recipient preparation for antibody removal or tolerance promotion, and multitargeted drug therapy will likely be required for successful clinical application.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

[Safety assessment of GM yeast feed additive with cecropin CAD gene].

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of GM yeast feed additive with cecropin CAD and to study and set up a model of Safety assessment for GM feed and detecting method. METHODS: To ensure the safety of the GM products, it has been done that to detect and value the safety of receptor organisms and expression products of extrinsic gene, the genetic stability of biologic properties of genomic modified yeast feed and condition of transfer and cumulation of anti-bacterial peptide and its products in circumstance and the feeded animals. RESULT AND CONCLUSION: The receptor animals and expression products of extrinic gene are safe, and the genomic modified products have steady genetic characters. The cectopin CAD neither cumulates in feeded animal nor releases into environment. The genomic modified feed additive is safe.

Animal Feed↗
PubMed2004

Elicitation of expert judgments of uncertainty in the risk assessment of herbicide-tolerant oilseed crops.

One of the lay public's concerns about genetically modified (GM) organisms (GMO) and related emerging technologies is that not all the important risks are evaluated or even identified yet--and that ignorance of the unanticipated risks could lead to severe environmental or public health consequences. To some degree, even the scientists who participated in the analysis of the risks from GMOs (arguably the people most qualified to critique these analyses) share some of this concern. To formally explore the uncertainty in the risk assessment of a GM crop, we conducted detailed interviews of seven leading experts on GM oilseed crops to obtain qualitative and quantitative information on their understanding of the uncertainties associated with the risks to agriculture from GM oilseed crops (canola or rapeseed). The results of these elicitations revealed three issues of potential concern that are currently left outside the scope of risk assessments. These are (1) the potential loss of the agronomic and environmental benefits of glyphosate (a herbicide widely used in no-till agriculture) due to the combined problems of glyphosate-tolerant canola and wheat volunteer plants, (2) the growing problem of seed lot contamination, and (3) the potential market impacts. The elicitations also identified two areas where knowledge is insufficient. These are: the occurrence of hybridization between canola and wild relatives and the ability of the hybrids to perpetuate themselves in nature, and the fate of the herbicide-tolerance genes in soil and their interaction with soil microfauna and -flora. The methodological contribution of this work is a formal approach to analyzing the uncertainty surrounding complex problems.

Agriculture↗
PubMed2026

Genetically Modified and Gene-Edited Organisms-Objectives, Public Perception and Applications.

Genetic modification and genome editing have become important tools in agriculture, animal production, biotechnology, and human medicine, but their safety and societal acceptance remain subjects of debate. This review examines genetically modified (GM) and gene-edited organisms, distinguishing transgenesis from precision genome editing technologies, including CRISPR/Cas9, base editing, and prime editing. Representative applications in crops, livestock, pharmaceutical production, and xenotransplantation are discussed, together with their regulatory framework and public perception. Current scientific assessments indicate that approved GM foods are not inherently more hazardous to human health than their conventional counterparts when evaluated case by case. Potential benefits include improved nutritional quality, biofortification, disease resistance, increased agricultural efficiency, production of therapeutic proteins, and applications in animal health and medicine. Possible concerns include allergenicity, toxicity, unintended genetic or phenotypic effects, altered nutritional composition, environmental consequences, animal welfare issues, and uncertainties associated with long-term or large-scale deployment. Public acceptance varies substantially according to geographical region, application, cultural and ethical considerations, regulatory environment, scientific literacy, and institutional trust. Overall, GM and gene-edited organisms should not be considered a homogeneous category. Their benefits, risks, and societal acceptability depend on the specific organism, genetic modification, intended trait, and context of use, supporting a balanced, evidence-based, and case-specific approach.

acceptance↗