SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Practice Guideline”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Practice guidelines and malpractice litigation: collision or cohesion?

Practice guidelines are standardized specifications for managing particular clinical problems and are intended to improve the outcomes of medical care by increasing adherence to standards of care. They are also meant to make medicine more cost-effective by eliminating unnecessary procedures. A relatively recent phenomenon, the practice guidelines now emerging will have implications for malpractice, which also intends to bring about better care. They will probably not revolutionize the procedures that courts use to determine negligence, but judges will integrate guidelines into their decision-making process. This development should be welcomed. Guidelines should prove to be useful as either inculpatory or exculpatory evidence of negligence. They are unlikely to generate much new litigation, although there is some potential for suits against those who issue guidelines, especially if guidelines are not revised as the technology of medical care changes.

Clinical Medicine↗

PubMed2004

Clinical practice guidelines on the initial assessment and treatment of urinary incontinence in women: a US focused review.

OBJECTIVE: To identify clinical practice guidelines from prominent US organizations for the initial management of urinary incontinence (UI) in women and compare them with recommendations from the International Consultation on Incontinence (ICI). The challenge of implementing guidelines in the US was also identified. METHODS: The medical literature was reviewed to identify relevant practice guidelines on the initial management of UI in community-dwelling women according to specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. Guidelines were compared with the ICI international gold standard relating to patient identification, initial therapy, and recommendation for specialist referral. Literature on programs to implement guidelines into clinical practice was reviewed. RESULTS: There is general agreement on how females with UI should be initially managed based on guidelines, monographs, and technical bulletins from prominent US organizations. Though these recommendations are more than 5 years old, they are fairly similar to the latest guidelines developed by the ICI in 2001. Minor discrepancies are mainly related to the lack of updating US guidelines based on most recent knowledge. Implementing existing guidelines into clinical practice presents a challenge. CONCLUSION: No evidence-based practice guidelines from prominent US organizations on the initial management of UI in women exist that are less than 5 years old, but the latest versions are in alignment with recent ICI/WHO guidelines. Although optimization of UI management may be the goal of guidances, the debate remains over whether these recommendations are actually effective in modifying practice. Simplifying and updating guidelines regularly may enhance adaptation in the initial management of UI in women.

Evidence-Based Medicine↗

PubMed1995

Practice guidelines for medical nutrition therapy provided by dietitians for persons with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. International Diabetes Center.

Nutrition practice guidelines define a systematic approach for medical nutrition therapy (MNT) provided by dietitians and are derived from scientific evidence and expert opinion. Nutrition practice guidelines for persons with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM) can be implemented for those with newly diagnosed or previously diagnosed NIDDM at the first visit to a dietitian for initial or ongoing MNT. The guidelines apply to patients treated with MNT alone, MNT and oral glucose-lowering agents, or MNT and insulin. They provide a framework to assist the dietitian in the assessment, intervention (nutrition prescription, education, goal setting), and evaluation of outcomes for MNT. Minimum referral data for clinical decision making and outcome criteria are defined. Basic nutrition care is defined as one visit with the dietitian. Nutrition practice guidelines care consists of a series of visits with the dietitian. At the second follow-up visit, the dietitian assesses what has been accomplished with the nutrition interventions. If the patient has implemented the nutrition recommendations to the best of his or her ability and has not achieved the treatment goals, the dietitian should notify the physician and recommend that changes in medical management are needed. Ongoing nutrition care is recommended at 6-month to 1-year intervals for both basic and practice guidelines care.

Blood Glucose↗

PubMed2003

Evaluation of a practice guideline for noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation for acute respiratory failure.

OBJECTIVES: Clinical practice guidelines have been devised to change practitioner performance and to improve the process and outcomes of care. The objective of this study was to determine whether adherence to a practice guideline on noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation (NPPV) for the treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) would change clinician behavior and resource utilization, and improve NPPV utilization and patient outcomes. DESIGN: Using a multidisciplinary team, we developed, implemented, and evaluated an NPPV practice guideline for ARF. Before and after guideline implementation, we recorded the incidence of endotracheal intubation (ETI) and mortality. Secondary outcomes were technological settings (ie, NPPV settings and duration) and NPPV administration (ie, cardiopulmonary monitoring, transfer to and time spent in the ICU, and pulmonary consultation). PARTICIPANTS: We enrolled 189 patients, 91 in the preguideline phase and 98 in the postguideline phase. Patients were similar in the both phases with respect to diagnoses at hospital admission and severity of illness. RESULTS: Of patients receiving NPPV for ARF, 67.3% fulfilled the guideline eligibility criteria in the postguideline phase compared to 62.6% in the preguideline phase (p = 0.543). Compared to the preguideline phase, more patients in the postguideline phase were transferred to the ICU (14.7% vs 33.7%, respectively; p = 0.003), spent more time in the ICU (30.9% vs 62.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001), and had consultation by a pulmonary physician (28.4% vs 49.0%, respectively; p = 0.004). There were no changes in technological settings. Guideline implementation was associated with improved cardiopulmonary monitoring. Nursing and respiratory therapist flow sheets were well-utilized during the guideline phase. There were no differences in ETI rates and mortality rates before and after guideline implementation. CONCLUSION: In this before-after study, we found that a multidisciplinary guideline for the use of NPPV for the treatment of patients with ARF was associated with changes in the process of care, with greater NPPV utilization in the ICU, and with increased pulmonary consultation, without any significant changes in the outcomes of care (ie, ETI and mortality rates).

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1994

Practice guidelines and reminders to reduce duration of hospital stay for patients with chest pain. An interventional trial.

OBJECTIVE: The acceptability, safety, and efficacy of practice guidelines have rarely been evaluated. Moreover, despite the recent development of guidelines and decision aids for patients admitted to coronary care and intermediate care units, few have been tested in clinical practice. DESIGN: A prospective, controlled clinical trial with an alternate-month design. SETTING: A large teaching community hospital. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to coronary care and intermediate care units with chest pain who were considered at low risk for complications according to a practice guideline (n = 375). INTERVENTION: Physicians caring for patients with chest pain who were at low risk for complications received concurrent, personalized written and verbal reminders regarding a guideline that recommended a 2-day hospital stay. RESULTS: Use of the practice guideline recommendation with concurrent reminders was associated with a 50% to 69% increase in guideline compliance (P < 0.001) and a decrease in length of stay from 3.54 +/- 4.1 to 2.63 +/- 3.0 days (0.91-day reduction, 95% CI, 0.18 to 1.63; P = 0.02) for all patients with chest pain considered at low risk for complications. The intervention was associated with a total (direct and indirect) cost reduction of $1397 per patient (CI, $176 to $2618; P = 0.03). No significant difference was found in the hospital complication rate between patients admitted to the hospital during control and intervention periods, and no significant difference was noted in complications, patient health status, or patient satisfaction when measured 1 month after hospital discharge. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that implementation of this practice guideline through concurrent reminders reduced hospital costs for patients with chest pain considered at low risk for complications. Further study of the guideline is warranted.

Aged↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Neonatal skin care: clinical outcomes of the AWHONN/NANN evidence-based clinical practice guideline. Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effectiveness of an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for neonatal skin care on selected clinical outcomes for newborns in neonatal intensive-care units (NICU), special-care units (SCU), and well-baby nurseries. DESIGN: Prospective evaluation of the collaborative neonatal skin care research-based practice project of the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses and the National Association of Neonatal Nurses. SETTING: NICU and well-baby units in 51 hospitals located throughout the United States. PARTICIPANTS: Member site coordinators (N = 51) and the neonates (N= 2,820) observed during both the pre- and postimplementation phases of the project. METHOD: Site coordinators received specialized education in neonatal skin care and implemented an evidence-based clinical practice guideline addressing 10 aspects of neonatal skin care. Baseline observations of skin condition, care practices, and environment of newly admitted neonates were collected by site coordinators. Postimplementation observations were then completed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Skin condition was assessed with the Neonatal Skin Condition Score (NSCS), which ranges from a score of three (best condition) to a score of nine (worst condition), based on dryness, erythema, and skin breakdown. Changes in frequency of selected skin care practices were used to assess the effectiveness and feasibility of using the practice guideline in everyday clinical practice. Aspects of the care environment with potential effect on skin integrity were monitored to determine risk factors. RESULTS: Fifty-one site coordinators made 11,468 systematic assessments of 2,464 NICU and SCU newborns and 356 well newborns. Baseline skin scores were better in well newborns compared with premature newborns. After implementation of the guideline, skin condition was improved, as reflected by less visible dryness, redness, and skin breakdown in both the NICU/SCU and well newborns. The guideline was integrated into care, as evidenced by increased use of emollients, particularly with premature infants, and decreased frequency of bathing. A relationship was shown between selected aspects of the environment and alterations in skin integrity. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the AWHONN/NANN Neonatal Skin Care Research-Based Clinical Practice Guideline was successfully implemented at 51 sites, and effectiveness was demonstrated by changed care practices and improved skin condition in premature and full-term newborns. The results of this project support a wider dissemination of the project's practice guideline for neonatal skin care.

Clinical Nursing Research↗

PubMed2001

A pneumonia practice guideline and a hospitalist-based reorganization lead to equivalent efficiency gains.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the impact of a practice guideline for a common inpatient disorder with that of a hospitalist-based reorganization of an academic medical service. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In July 1995 we introduced a clinical practice guideline for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia at University of California San Francisco Moffitt-Long Hospital. Simultaneously, we implemented a structural change for half of the inpatient medical service, requiring earlier and more intensive faculty intervention, primarily by hospitalists. For 1 year, we studied the effect of these interventions on hospital costs, length of stay, and resource use. RESULTS: As reported previously, the hospitalist-based intervention resulted in significant decreases in average adjusted cost ($7777 vs $7007, P = .05) and length of stay (4.9 days vs 4.3 days, P = .01) compared with both concurrent and historical controls. For patients with community-acquired pneumonia, a similar savings occurred when fiscal year 1996 was compared with fiscal year 1995 ($8164 vs $6282, P= .015; 5.0 vs 4.2 days, P= .04). However, the effect was identical for the hospitalist and nonhospitalist groups. The reduced length of stay was associated with a borderline significant reduction in readmission rates (from 4.8% to 0.7%, P = .055) and no change in mortality rates. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, a hospitalist-based reorganization improved efficiency, with its greatest impact on the care of patients with disorders not covered by a practice guideline. The introduction of a guideline for a common diagnosis improved efficiency on both hospitalist- and nonhospitalist-based services. For common diagnoses amenable to practice guidelines, successful implementation of and compliance with guidelines may be an alternative to major organizational change.

Adult↗

PubMed2003

Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: opinions of dental practitioners on their contribution to the quality of dental care.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the opinions of general dental practitioners regarding the development and importance of clinical practice guidelines and their contribution to the quality of dental care. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to a representative sample of 1656 dentists in the Netherlands. Factor analysis was conducted to identify scales of variables, and a reliability analysis was conducted to verify the reliability of the identified scales. The effect of the independent variables is expressed as odds ratio per scale part (standard deviation, SD). Regression analyses were conducted to study determinants of the opinions on clinical guidelines. RESULTS: The response rate was 73%; 54% of the respondents supported the development of clinical practice guidelines for dentists. Most respondents indicated that clinical practice guidelines could be used as a checklist, as a support in daily clinical decision making, and as a basis for continuing dental education. The factor analyses yielded four scale factors-contribution of guidelines to effectiveness of care (OR 1.95/SD), contribution of guidelines to professional autonomy (OR 1.70/SD), contribution of guidelines to quality of care (OR 2.52/SD), and contribution of guidelines to collaboration (OR 1.49/SD)-which complied with the criterion of Cronbach's alpha >0.60. Multiple regression analysis with the four scale factors as dependent variables yielded only extremely low correlations for practice and dentist characteristics (R(2)=0.01-0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Only about 50% of dentists support the development and implementation of clinical guidelines. Guidelines are seen as helpful in the provision of continuing dental education and as a support in daily clinical decision making. The most important barrier to successful implementation of clinical practice guidelines is the fear of dental practitioners that guidelines will reduce their professional autonomy. Practice and dentist characteristics are unrelated to dentists' opinions on clinical practice guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Analysis of the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners with respect to the use of blood tests.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the consistency among the practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners with respect to the use of blood tests. METHODS: The authors evaluated 64 practice guidelines of the Dutch College of General Practitioners. For each guideline, they analyzed each sentence that contained a reference to a blood test to determine the clinical situation in which the test should be performed (the indication) and to determine the tests that should be performed in that situation (the recommended test). An incomplete recommendation refers to a guideline that mentioned a blood test but did not identify the indication for that test. An inconsistency refers to the situation in which one guideline recommended a certain test for a given indication whereas another guideline mentioned the same indication but did not recommend the same test. RESULTS: Twenty-seven practice guidelines mentioned blood tests. Of these, three explicitly recommended not to request blood tests. Five guidelines contained incomplete recommendations, and the authors encountered two inconsistencies among the guidelines. Twenty-three guidelines mentioned blood tests and allowed the authors to identify indications and recommended tests. CONCLUSION: The identification of indications and recommended tests allows evaluation of consistency among practice guidelines. Although some incomplete recommendations and inconsistencies were discovered, the majority of the guidelines provide clear and unambiguous recommendations for blood-test ordering in primary care.

Family Practice↗

PubMed2000

Influence of clinicians' values and perceptions on use of clinical practice guidelines for sedation and neuromuscular blockade in patients receiving mechanical ventilation.

BACKGROUND: Although popular, clinical practice guidelines are not universally accepted by healthcare professionals. OBJECTIVES: To compare nurses' and physicians' actual and perceived rates of adherence to practice guidelines used in sedation of patients receiving mechanical ventilation and to describe nurses' and physicians' perceptions of guideline use. METHODS: Pairs of fellows and nurses caring for 60 eligible patients were asked separately about their rationale for medicating patients, effectiveness of medication, and their perceived adherence to the guidelines. Actual adherence was determined independently by review of medical records. An additional 18 nurses and 11 physicians were interviewed about perceptions of guideline use. RESULTS: Use of mechanical ventilation was the most common reason given by physicians (53%) and nurses (48%) for medicating patients, although reasons for administering medication to a given patient differed in up to 30% of cases. Physicians and nurses disagreed on the effectiveness of medication in 42% (P = .01) of cases. Physicians reported following guidelines in 69% of cases, but their actual adherence rate was only 20%. Clinicians sometimes had difficulty distinguishing among anxiety, pain, and delirium. Clinicians justified variations from guidelines by citing the value of individualized patient care. Nurses and physicians sometimes had different goals in the use of sedation. CONCLUSIONS: Physicians may think they are following sedation guidelines when they are not, and they may prescribe incorrect medications if the cause of agitation is misdiagnosed. Differences between physicians and nurses in values and perceptions may hamper implementation of clinical practice guidelines.

Adult↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical practice guidelines in dentistry: Part I. Navigating new waters.

Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) are tools, developed by and for practitioners, to assist in clinical decision making. They are designed to enhance, not replace, clinical judgement and expertise. Well-developed guidelines use the evidence-based approach. The research evidence related to a topic is assembled in a systematic, comprehensive and unbiased manner. Recommendations are made based on the evidence and practitioner feedback is sought prior to formulating the final practice guideline. There are many misperceptions about CPGs and some dentists are wary about their development and use. In this paper, we explore some of the reasons for these misperceptions, review the benefits of sound guidelines, and discuss some of the challenges for guideline development in dentistry in Canada

Canada↗

PubMed2003

An independent assessment of chiropractic practice guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of Recommended Clinical Protocols and Guidelines for the Practice of Chiropractic (ICA guidelines) published by the International Chiropractors Association (ICA), August, 2000. METHODS: The Appraisal Instrument for Clinical Guidelines (Cluzeau instrument) was applied to the ICA guidelines by 10 independent experienced evaluators. An independent, global assessment was also made by each evaluator. RESULTS: Mean scores (with 95% confidence limit) for each of the instrument's 3 dimensions were Rigor of Development, 27% (5.1); Context and Content, 18.3% (9.4); and Application, 2% (3.9). The unanimous global assessment was "not recommended as suitable for utilization in practice." Comparison of the ICA guideline scores with the Council on Chiropractic Practice's Clinical Practice Guideline No. 1, Vertebral Subluxation in Chiropractic Practice (CCP guidelines) scores and Guidelines for Chiropractic Quality Assurance and Practice Parameters (Mercy guidelines) Cluzeau instrument-based scores revealed that the ICA guidelines received slightly higher scores than the CCP guidelines but substantially lower scores than the Mercy guidelines for all dimensions. CONCLUSION: The ICA guidelines were assessed as not suitable for utilization in chiropractic practice.

Chiropractic↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Adapting national and international leg ulcer practice guidelines for local use: the Ontario Leg Ulcer Community Care Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Because of growing resources devoted to individuals requiring community care for leg ulcers, the authority responsible for home care in Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, established and evaluated a demonstration leg ulcer service. In an effort to provide current and evidence-based care, existing leg ulcer clinical practice guidelines were identified and appraised for quality and suitability to the new service. PROCESS: The Practice Guideline Evaluation and Adaptation Cycle guided development of a local protocol for leg ulcer care, which included: (1) systematically searching for practice guidelines, (2) appraising the quality of identified guidelines using a validated guideline appraisal instrument, (3) conducting a content analysis of guideline recommendations, (4) selecting recommendations to include in the local protocol, and (5) obtaining practitioner and external expert feedback on the proposed protocol. Updating the protocol followed a similar process. RESULTS: Of 19 identified leg ulcer practice guidelines, 14 were not evaluated because they did not meet the criteria (ie, treatment-focused guidelines, written in English and developed after 1998). Of the 5 remaining guidelines, 3 were fairly well developed and made similar recommendations. The level of evidence supporting specific recommendations ranged from randomized clinical trial evidence to expert opinion. By comparing the methodologic quality and content of the guidelines, the Task Force reached consensus regarding recommendations appropriate for local application. Two additional guidelines were subsequently identified and incorporated into the local protocol during a scheduled update. CONCLUSIONS: Local adaptation of international and national guidelines is feasible following facilitation of the Practice Guidelines Evaluation and Adaptation Cycle.

Community Health Services↗

PubMed2004

Ulcerative colitis practice guidelines in adults (update): American College of Gastroenterology, Practice Parameters Committee.

Guidelines for clinical practice are intended to indicate preferred approaches to medical problems as established by scientifically valid research. Double-blind placebo-controlled studies are preferable, but compassionate use reports and expert review articles are utilized in a thorough review of the literature conducted through Medline with the National Library of Medicine. When only data that will not withstand objective scrutiny are available, a recommendation is identified as a consensus of experts. Guidelines are applicable to all physicians who address the subject without regard to the specialty training or interests and are intended to indicate the preferable but not necessarily the only acceptable approach to a specific problem. Guidelines are intended to be flexible and must be distinguished from standards of care, which are inflexible and rarely violated. Given the wide range of specifics in any health-care problem, the physician must always choose the course best suited to the individual patient and the variables in existence at the moment of decision. Guidelines are developed under the auspices of the American College of Gastroenterology and its Practice Parameters Committee and approved by the Board of Trustees. Each has been extensively reviewed and revised by the Committee, other experts in the field, physicians who will use them, and specialists in the science of decision of analysis. The recommendations of each guideline are therefore considered valid at the time of their production based on the data available. New developments in medical research and practice pertinent to each guideline will be reviewed at a time established and indicated at the publication in order to assure continued validity.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

European best practice guidelines for the management of anaemia in patients with chronic renal failure.

Best practice guidelines recommend management strategies and attempt to set standards for optimal patient care. The momentum towards formulating guidelines comes not only from health care professionals, but also from health care management organizations, who need some way of measuring the quality of the services they purchase. The European Best Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anaemia in Patients with Chronic Renal Failure have been drawn up by a Working Party including representatives of the European Renal Association/European Dialysis and Transplantation Association (ERA-EDTA) and the national nephrology societies of a cross-section of European countries. The guidelines draw on the National Kidney Foundation-Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (NKF-DOQI) Clinical Best Practice Guidelines for the Treatment of Anemia in Chronic Renal Failure, but reflect European clinical practice and experience. They include additional publications, and new analysis and interpretation of the evidence base. Topics covered in the European guidelines include diagnosis of the anaemia of chronic renal failure, indications for starting treatment with epoetin, recommended minimum target haemoglobin concentrations, epoetin dosage and route of administration, assessing and optimizing iron stores, causes and management of epoetin resistance, and possible adverse effects of epoetin treatment. The guidelines are not intended to be prescriptive but rather to provide clinical guidance based on the best available evidence. The evidence supporting each guideline is graded, so that physicians may judge its reliability.

Anemia↗

PubMed1998

Residents find clinical practice guidelines valuable as educational and clinical tools.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Information regarding clinical practice guideline (CPG) use in residency education is limited. We surveyed a regional population of family practice residents to determine use, attitudes, and curricular needs for practice guidelines. METHODS: A written survey was developed that measured residents' exposure to, frequency of use, attitudes, access, and knowledge about use of CPGs. The survey was mailed to 114 family practice residents. RESULTS: The response rate was 75%. The most frequently seen guidelines were immunization schedules, cancer screening, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension management. The residents reported positive attitudes toward CPGs; 75% thought CPGs were easy to use, 80% thought they improved their efficiency, 78% thought they improved their residency education, and 75% thought they improved patient care. Barriers to effective use of practice guidelines were also identified; 20% knew where to find guidelines in their clinic, 35% had faculty modeling, and 22% knew how to evaluate the validity of a guideline. Eighty-nine percent of respondents desired instruction on CPG use and interpretation. CONCLUSIONS: The surveyed family practice residents have similar usage rates for CPGs as the literature reports for practicing physicians, but residents report more positive attitudes. Barriers that prevent effective use of CPGs in training environments include lack of critical appraisal abilities and faculty role modeling.

Curriculum↗

PubMed2005

Predictors of high quality clinical practice guidelines: examples in oncology.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical practice guidelines are widely used as effective tools for improving the management of patients with cancer. However, there is increasing concern about variation in guideline quality. In this study we identified predictors for high-quality guidelines in oncology. DESIGN: The quality scores for 32 oncology guidelines from 13 countries were determined by four independent appraisers using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) instrument. MAIN MEASURE: : The contribution to the quality score of six characteristics of guidelines and three of guideline developing organizations was then assessed using analysis of variance and stepwise linear regression analysis. RESULTS: Some guideline and organizational characteristics were shown to be responsible for a large part of the variations in quality scores. The availability of background information was the strongest predictor of quality with an explained variance ranging from 17% ("Applicability") to 67% ("Rigour of development"). High-quality guidelines were more often produced by government-supported organizations and/or within a structured, coordinated programme. The other characteristics (publication year, type of guideline, format, level of care, and scope) were not independent predictors of quality. CONCLUSIONS: Guidelines should provide more explicit information about the context of their development and methods used in order to improve their quality and thus encourage their use in clinical practice.

Analysis of Variance↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Clinical practice guidelines in the nursing home.

Clinical practice guidelines are an important tool for improving quality of care. This study determined whether and how guidelines are being used in nursing homes. We surveyed staff at 36 Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) nursing homes. Employees were asked whether they were familiar with guidelines as well as whether 5 specific guidelines had been read, were available, and had been adopted. Among 1065 respondents (60% of those surveyed), 79% reported familiarity with guidelines. The proportion of staff at a facility reporting adoption was generally less than 50%. Those nursing homes in which a high percentage of the staff reported adoption of one guideline were more likely to have adopted other guidelines. However, staff were not more likely to report adoption of a specific guideline when the nurse manager stated that it was adopted. We conclude that staff at VA nursing homes are familiar with guidelines. Guideline adoption at individual nursing homes, however, is not a systematic process involving the entire staff.

Diffusion of Innovation↗