PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Procedural Sedation”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources
PubMed1993

Pain control during interventional biliary procedures: epidural anesthesia vs i.v. sedation.

OBJECTIVE: We performed a study designed to compare epidural anesthesia with IV sedation for the control of pain during interventional biliary procedures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Two hundred sixty-three biliary procedures were performed in 126 patients during a 3-year period. The transhepatic approach was used for all the procedures. Epidural anesthesia was used in 140 procedures and IV sedation was used in 123. Both epidural anesthesia and IV sedation were used in 31 patients who required multiple procedures. The efficacy of each method for control of pain was determined by a subjective rating of the patients' pain during the procedure: from 0 (no pain) to +3 (severe). The ratings were compiled and compared for each of the methods to ascertain which technique best achieved the desired effect. The pain control used depended on the urgency of the procedures and the availability of an anesthesiologist to administer epidural anesthetic. When an anesthesiologist was unavailable, IV sedation was used. The type and amount of drug administered depended on the patient's preference and history. RESULTS: Of the 140 procedures done with epidural anesthesia, patients had no pain to mild pain in 127 (91%) and moderate to severe pain in 13 (9%). All instances of moderate to severe pain were the result of unsuccessful attempts to establish or maintain anesthesia. Of the 123 procedures done with IV sedation, patients had no pain to mild pain in 62 (50%) and moderate to severe pain in 61 (50%). Complications were more frequent when IV sedation was used. Six (5%) occurred, and all were related to hypotension. The hypotensive episodes occurred early in the study, before monitoring of patients was improved; now, continuous updates on vital signs are provided throughout the interventional procedure. With epidural anesthesia, hypotension developed in only one patient (< 1%) and the patient responded to fluid administration. CONCLUSION: When it is successful, epidural anesthesia can completely eliminate moderate to severe pain in patients undergoing biliary procedures. IV sedation is only 50% effective in this regard. The greater efficacy of epidural anesthesia, coupled with the significantly lower prevalence of hypotension, justifies the additional cost and time associated with epidural anesthesia for pain management in biliary procedures.

Analgesics, Opioid↗
PubMed1996

The use of propofol for sedation in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effectiveness of propofol and fentanyl when used by emergency physicians (EPs) for systemic sedation and analgesia in the ED. METHODS: Over an eight-month period, a convenience sample of consenting patients at an urban teaching hospital ED who required sedation for painful procedures were enrolled in a descriptive study of therapeutic propofol sedation. After receiving 2 micrograms/kg of fentanyl i.v. the patients received a continuous infusion of propofol at 0.21 mg/kg/min i.v. to the desired level of sedation. A maintenance infusion of 3-6 mg/kg/hr was administered during the remainder of the procedure. Sedation time, total procedure time, and recovery time were recorded and the presence of side effects was noted. The patients and the physicians rated their satisfaction with the technique on a 100-mm visual analog scale. The patients were contacted at 24 hours for follow-up information. RESULTS: Twenty patients (aged 19-62 years) received propofol infusion for procedures that included ten abscess incision and drainages, eight orthopedic reductions, one chest tube placement, and one wound exploration. The mean (+/- SD) total dose of propofol was 200 +/- 160 mg. The mean time to onset of sedation was 6.6 +/- 3.2 min, the mean procedure interval was 9.6 +/- 6.3 min, and the mean interval until recovery was 6.1 +/- 4.1 min. The median patient satisfaction score was 97 mm (range 40-100 mm); the median rating by physicians was 88 mm (range 4-100 mm). Side effects were noted in six patients: three had pain on injection, one had pain on injection and brief (< 1 min) hypotension (systolic blood pressure = 80 mm Hg), and two had apnea (< 30 sec). Seven patients had some recall of the procedure immediately afterwards, but only five had any recall at 24 hours. All 20 patients stated they would be willing to receive the same sedation again for a future procedure. CONCLUSION: Propofol appears to be an effective agent to provide systemic sedation and analgesia when used in conjunction with fentanyl for procedures in the ED. Given its rapidity of onset and elimination, it may become a useful agent to EPs for i.v. sedation in the ED.

Adult↗
PubMed2006

Microstream capnography improves patient monitoring during moderate sedation: a randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Investigative efforts to improve monitoring during sedation for patients of all ages are part of a national agenda for patient safety. According to the Institute of Medicine, recent technological advances in patient monitoring have contributed to substantially decreased mortality for people receiving general anesthesia in operating room settings. Patient safety has not been similarly targeted for the several million children annually in the United States who receive moderate sedation without endotracheal intubation. Critical event analyses have documented that hypoxemia secondary to depressed respiratory activity is a principal risk factor for near misses and death in this population. Current guidelines for monitoring patient safety during moderate sedation in children call for continuous pulse oximetry and visual assessment, which may not detect alveolar hypoventilation until arterial oxygen desaturation has occurred. Microstream capnography may provide an "early warning system" by generating real-time waveforms of respiratory activity in nonintubated patients. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine whether intervention based on capnography indications of alveolar hypoventilation reduces the incidence of arterial oxygen desaturation in nonintubated children receiving moderate sedation for nonsurgical procedures. PARTICIPANTS AND METHODS: We included 163 children undergoing 174 elective gastrointestinal procedures with moderate sedation in a pediatric endoscopy unit in a randomized, controlled trial. All of the patients received routine care, including 2-L supplemental oxygen via nasal cannula. Investigators, patients, and endoscopy staff were blinded to additional capnography monitoring. In the intervention arm, trained independent observers signaled to clinical staff if capnograms indicated alveolar hypoventilation for >15 seconds. In the control arm, observers signaled if capnograms indicated alveolar hypoventilation for >60 seconds. Endoscopy nurses responded to signals in both arms by encouraging patients to breathe deeply, even if routine patient monitoring did not indicate a change in respiratory status. OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome measure was patient arterial oxygen desaturation defined as a pulse oximetry reading of <95% for >5 seconds. Secondary outcome measures included documented assessments of abnormal ventilation, termination of the procedure secondary to concerns for patient safety, as well as other more rare adverse events including need for bag-mask ventilation, sedation reversal, or seizures. RESULTS: Children randomly assigned to the intervention arm were significantly less likely to experience arterial oxygen desaturation than children in the control arm. Two study patients had documented adverse events, with no procedures terminated for patient safety concerns. Intervention and control patients did not differ in baseline characteristics. Endoscopy staff documented poor ventilation in 3% of all procedures and no apnea. Capnography indicated alveolar hypoventilation during 56% of procedures and apnea during 24%. We found no change in magnitude or statistical significance of the intervention effect when we adjusted the analysis for age, sedative dose, or other covariates. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this controlled effectiveness trial support routine use of microstream capnography to detect alveolar hypoventilation and reduce hypoxemia during procedural sedation in children. In addition, capnography allowed early detection of arterial oxygen desaturation because of alveolar hypoventilation in the presence of supplemental oxygen. The current standard of care for monitoring all patients receiving sedation relies overtly on pulse oximetry, which does not measure ventilation. Most medical societies and regulatory organizations consider moderate sedation to be safe but also acknowledge serious associated risks, including suboptimal ventilation, airway obstruction, apnea, hypoxemia, hypoxia, and cardiopulmonary arrest. The results of this controlled trial suggest that microstream capnography improves the current standard of care for monitoring sedated children by allowing early detection of respiratory compromise, prompting intervention to minimize hypoxemia. Integrating capnography into patient monitoring protocols may ultimately improve the safety of nonintubated patients receiving moderate sedation.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2006

A randomized, controlled trial of i.v. versus i.m. ketamine for sedation of pediatric patients receiving emergency department orthopedic procedures.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: We compare adverse events, efficacy, and length of sedation of intravenous (i.v.) versus intramuscular (i.m.) ketamine procedural sedation and analgesia for orthopedic procedures in the emergency department (ED). METHODS: Pediatric patients receiving ketamine for orthopedic procedures were enrolled in a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in a children's hospital ED. All patients were initially randomized to receive ketamine either 1 mg/kg i.v. or 4 mg/kg i.m. Demographics, adverse events, sedation efficacy, and length of sedation were recorded. RESULTS: Two hundred twenty-five patients were randomized (116 i.v., 109 i.m.). Two hundred eight patients, aged 14 months to 15 years, completed the study, 109 i.v. and 99 i.m. Respiratory adverse events were similar between groups (i.v. 8.3% versus i.m. 4.0%; odds ratio [OR] 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.14 to 1.6). Vomiting in the ED was more common in the i.m. group (26.3% versus 11.9%; OR 2.60; 95% CI 1.2 to 5.9). Using the Faces Pain Scale, patients in the i.m. group reported significantly less pain from the procedure. Video observers reported significantly lower distress in the i.m. group during the painful procedure (Observation Score of Behavioral Distress scores 0.35 i.m. versus 0.74 i.v.; mean difference 0.38; 95% CI 0.04 to 0.72). Length of sedation was significantly longer in the i.m. group (median 129 versus 80 minutes). Satisfaction of sedation was high in parents and physicians, with no difference in reported satisfaction between groups. This study was terminated early because of nursing resistance based on the longer recovery times observed in patients receiving ketamine i.m. CONCLUSION: In this study of pediatric sedation for orthopedic procedures, we found that ketamine 4 mg/kg i.m. was more effective than 1 mg/kg i.v. but demonstrated significantly longer recovery times and more vomiting.

Adolescent↗