PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “repressor proteins”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

NMR structure and functional studies of the Mu repressor DNA-binding domain.

The repressor protein of bacteriophage Mu establishes and maintains lysogeny by shutting down transposition functions needed for phage DNA replication. It interacts with several repeated DNA sequences within the early operator, preventing transcription from two divergent promoters. It also directly represses transposition by competing with the MuA transposase for an internal activation sequence (IAS) that is coincident with the operator and required for efficient transposition. The transposase and repressor proteins compete for the operator/IAS region using homologous DNA-binding domains located at their amino termini. Here we present the solution structure of the amino-terminal DNA-binding domain from the repressor protein determined by heteronuclear multidimensional nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The structure of the repressor DNA-binding domain provides insights into the molecular basis of several temperature sensitive mutations and, in combination with complementary experiments using flourescence anisotropy, surface plasmon resonance, and circular dichroism, defines the structural and biochemical differences between the transposase and repressor DNA-binding modules. We find that the repressor and enhancer domains possess similar three-dimensional structures, thermostabilities, and intrinsic affinities for DNA. This latter result suggests that the higher affinity of the full-length repressor relative to that of the MuA transposase protein originates from cooperative interactions between repressor protomers and not from intrinsic differences in their DNA-binding domains. In addition, we present the results of nucleotide and amino acid mutagenesis which delimits the minimal repressor DNA-binding module and coarsely defines the nucleotide dependence of repressor binding.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

The inducible lac operator-repressor system is functional for control of expression of injected DNA in Xenopus oocytes.

We have investigated the use of the Escherichia coli lac operator-repressor system to regulate the expression of genes introduced by microinjection into Xenopus laevis oocytes. We observe that expression of an MSV-cat fusion gene, in which the lac operator was inserted between the TATA box and the transcription start point (tsp), or between the tsp and the start codon (ATG), is completely repressed when the lac repressor protein is added to the plasmid suspension prior to injection. The lac repressor had no detectable effect on the expression of a coinjected HSV-1 tk gene that had no operator insertion (or on an MSV-cat gene without an operator), indicating that the nonspecific DNA-binding properties of the repressor do not inhibit transcription. CAT activity expressed from the operator-containing MSV-cat genes transcribed in the oocyte nucleus was also inhibited by repressor injected into the oocyte cytoplasm, showing that biologically active repressor proteins can enter the nucleus from the cytoplasm. Injection of the inducer IPTG into the oocyte cytoplasm markedly derepressed the repressed cat genes but not the HSV-1 tk gene coinjected as an internal control. Overall, our results show that the lac operator-repressor system can be useful as a genetic switch in the regulation of gene expression of injected DNA in frog oocytes. Finally, our observations on the vectors used in this work show that the MSV enhancer significantly activates transcription from the SV40 early promoter in frog oocytes, although previous studies have indicated that the MSV enhancer is not necessary for the activity of the MSV promoter in oocytes [Graves et al., Mol. Cell. Biol. 5 (1985) 1945-1958].

Animals↗

How mammalian transcriptional repressors work.

Research on the regulation of transcription in mammals initially focused on the mechanism of transcriptional activation and 'positive control' of gene regulation. In contrast, transcriptional repression and 'negative control' of gene transcription was viewed rather as part of the 'prokaryotic book of biology'. However, results obtained in recent years have shown convincingly that transcriptional repression mediated by repressor proteins is a common regulatory mechanism in mammals and may play a key role in many biological processes. In particular, the fact that human diseases, such as Rett and ICF syndromes as well as some human forms of cancer, are connected with the activities of human repressor proteins indicates that transcriptional repression and gene silencing is essential for maintenance of the cellular integrity of a multicellular organism. The wide range of diseases caused by aberration in transcriptional repression sheds light on the importance of understanding how mammalian transcriptional repressor proteins work.

Animals↗

The MtrR repressor binds the DNA sequence between the mtrR and mtrC genes of Neisseria gonorrhoeae.

Gonococcal resistance to antimicrobial hydrophobic agents (HAs) is due to energy-dependent removal of HAs from the bacterial cell by the MtrCDE membrane-associated efflux pump. The mtrR (multiple transferrable resistance Regulator) gene encodes a putative transcriptional repressor protein (MtrR) believed to be responsible for regulation of mtrCDE gene expression. Gel mobility shift and DNase I footprint assays that used a maltose-binding protein (MBP)-MtrR fusion protein demonstrated that the MtrR repressor is capable of specifically binding the DNA sequence between the mtrR and mtrC genes. This binding site was localized to a 26-nucleotide stretch that includes the promoter utilized for mtrCDE transcription and, on the complementary strand, a 22-nucleotide stretch that contains the -35 region of the mtrR promoter. A single transition mutation (A-->G) within the MtrR-binding site decreased the affinity of the target DNA for MtrR and enhanced gonococcal resistance to HAs when introduced into HA-susceptible strain FA19 by transformation. Since this mutation enhanced expression of the mtrCDE gene complex but decreased expression of the mtrR gene, the data are consistent with the notion that MtrR acts as a transcriptional repressor of the mtrCDE efflux pump protein genes.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Intracellular Trp repressor levels in Escherichia coli.

A radioimmunoassay for the Trp repressor protein of Escherichia coli was developed with antisera raised against purified Trp repressor protein. This assay was used to directly measure the intracellular Trp repressor content in several E. coli K-12 and B/r strains. Repressor levels varied from 2.5- to 3-fold in response to L-tryptophan concentration in the growth medium (15 to 44 ng of repressor per mg of protein). Neither cell growth rate nor culture age had a significant effect on repressor concentrations within the cell. Addition of L-tryptophan to the growth medium resulted in lowered intracellular levels of Trp repressor. The absolute amounts of native Trp repressor molecules per cell varied between 120 and 375 dimers in the presence and absence of L-tryptophan in the culture medium, respectively. Assuming an intracellular volume of 7.3 microliters/10(10) E. coli cells, the Trp repressor concentration varied from 270 to 850 nM in response to extracellular tryptophan levels. These findings represent the first direct measurements of Trp repressor levels in E. coli and confirm the autoregulatory nature of the trpR gene.

Bacterial Proteins↗

Phosphorylation sites of the E2 transcriptional regulatory proteins of bovine papillomavirus type 1.

The E2 open reading frame of bovine papillomavirus type 1 (BPV-1) encodes three transcriptional regulatory proteins. The full-length open reading frame encodes a protein of 410 amino acids which functions as a transcriptional transactivator. Two transcriptional repressor proteins, E2-TR and E8/E2, contain the C-terminal 249 and 204 amino acids, respectively. We have expressed both the full-length E2 protein and the E2-TR repressor protein in insect cells, by using recombinant baculoviruses, and in mammalian COS-1 cells, by using a chimeric simian virus 40/BPV-1 virus. Analysis of the E2 proteins revealed that both the transactivator and repressor forms are phosphorylated predominately on serine residues at similar sites in both expression systems. By a combination of peptide mapping and site-directed mutagenesis techniques, the serine residues at positions 298 and 301 were determined to be the major phosphorylation sites of the BPV-1 E2 proteins.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Functional inactivation of the SR family of splicing factors during a vaccinia virus infection.

SR proteins are essential splicing factors required for constitutive splicing and function as key regulators of alternative RNA splicing. We have shown that SR proteins purified from late adenovirus-infected cells (SR-Ad) are functionally inactivated as splicing enhancer or splicing repressor proteins by a virus-induced partial de-phosphorylation. Here, we show that SR proteins purified from late vaccinia-virus-infected cells (SR-VV) are also hypo-phosphorylated and functionally inactivated as splicing regulatory proteins. We further show that incubating SR-Ad proteins under conditions that restore the phospho-epitopes to the SR proteins results in the restoration of their activity as splicing enhancer and splicing repressor proteins. Interestingly, re-phosphorylation of SR-VV proteins only partially restored the splicing enhancer or splicing repressor phenotype to the SR proteins. Collectively, our results suggest that viral control of SR protein activity may be a common strategy used by DNA viruses to take control of the host cell RNA splicing machinery.

Adenoviridae↗

Evidence for regulation of actin synthesis in cytochalasin D-treated HEp-2 cells.

In HEp-2 cells treated with 0.2 or 2.0 microM cytochalasin D (CD), the relative rate of actin synthesis increased for about 12 h and then reached a plateau; this increase was suppressed by actinomycin D (AD). When CD was washed from cells which had been treated for 20 h, the elevated rate of actin synthesis declined to the control value within ca 4 h, as the actin-containing cytoskeletal components rearranged by CD recovered their normal morphology. Subsequently, actin synthesis was depressed below control values for a prolonged period; during recovery from 2 h treatment with CD, this depression was of much shorter duration. Re-addition of CD to cells after a 3 h recovery period again induced the cytoskeletal alterations characteristic of CD treatment but did not reverse the prior decline in the rate of actin synthesis. In HEp-2 cells treated with cycloheximide during exposure to CD for 20 h, the relative rate of actin synthesis measured after removal of cycloheximide was twofold higher than with CD alone and such cells exhibited a twofold slower decline in the rate of actin synthesis during recovery from CD in the continued presence of cycloheximide. These effects of cycloheximide, which resemble observations on "super-induction", suggest that actin synthesis in CD-treated and recovering HEp-2 cells may be regulated by a repressor protein. The possibility that the proposed repressor protein is actin and that actin may thus be a feedback inhibitor of its own synthesis is discussed.

Actins↗

Molecular analysis of treB encoding the Escherichia coli enzyme II specific for trehalose.

A gene bank of partially Sau3A-digested Escherichia coli DNA ligated in plasmid pBR322 was screened for the ability to complement a mutant unable to metabolize trehalose at low osmolarity. The resulting plasmid was shown to contain the genes encoding transport (treB) and metabolic (treC) functions. The complementing DNA region was sequenced and shown to contain an operon of two genes, with treB as the promoter proximal gene and with treC as the promoter distal gene. The transcriptional start point was determined, and one major transcript was detected. The control region of the operon was found to contain consensus binding motifs for the cyclic AMP-catabolite activator protein complex and for a specific repressor protein whose gene, treR, is located immediately upstream of treB, being transcribed in the same direction as treB treC. The products of both genes could be expressed in minicells in which TreB revealed itself as a protein with an apparent molecular weight of 42,000. The gene product of treB consists of 485 amino acids with a calculated molecular weight of 52,308. It showed high homology to enzymes IIScr of enteric bacteria specific for the uptake of sucrose and encoded by plasmid pUR400 of enteric bacteria. Like enzyme IIScr, enzyme IITre belongs to the EIIBC domain type and lacks a covalently bound EIIA domain. Instead, enzyme IITre-mediated phosphorylation of trehalose requires the activity of enzyme IIAGlc, a component of the major glucose transport system.

Adaptation, Physiological↗

KRAB-independent suppression of neoplastic cell growth by the novel zinc finger transcription factor KS1.

The study of zinc finger proteins has revealed their potential to act as oncogenes or tumor suppressors. Here we report the molecular, biochemical, and functional characterization of KS1 (KRAB/zinc finger suppressor protein 1), a novel, ubiquitously expressed zinc finger gene initially isolated from a rat pancreas library. KS1 contains 10 C2H2 zinc fingers, a KRAB-A/B motif, and an ID sequence that has been shown previously to participate in growth factor-regulated gene expression. Northern blot analysis using pancreatic cell lines demonstrates that KS1 mRNA is inducible by serum and epidermal growth factor, suggesting a role for this gene in cell growth regulation. Biochemical analysis reveals that KS1 is a nuclear protein containing two transcriptional repressor domains, R1 and R2. R1 corresponds to the KRAB-A motif, whereas R2 represents a novel sequence. Transformation assays using NIH3T3 cells demonstrate that KS1 suppresses transformation by the potent oncogenes Ha-ras, Galpha12, and Galpha13. Deletion of the R1/ KRAB-A domain does not modify the transformation suppressive activity of KS1, whereas deletion of R2 abolishes this function. Thus, KS1 is a novel growth factor-inducible zinc finger transcriptional repressor protein with the potential to protect against neoplastic transformation induced by several oncogenes.

3T3 Cells↗

Purification and characterization of the DeoR repressor of Bacillus subtilis.

Transcription of the Bacillus subtilis dra-nupC-pdp operon is repressed by the DeoR repressor protein. The DeoR repressor with an N-terminal His tag was overproduced with a plasmid under control of a phage T5 promoter in Escherichia coli and was purified to near homogeneity by one affinity chromatography step. Gel filtration experimental results showed that native DeoR has a mass of 280 kDa and appears to exist as an octamer. Binding of DeoR to the operator DNA of the dra-nupC-pdp operon was characterized by using an electrophoretic gel mobility shift assay. An apparent dissociation constant of 22 nM was determined for binding of DeoR to operator DNA, and the binding curve indicated that the binding of DeoR to the operator DNA was cooperative. In the presence of low-molecular-weight effector deoxyribose-5-phosphate, the dissociation constant was higher than 1,280 nM. The dissociation constant remained unchanged in the presence of deoxyribose-1-phosphate. DNase I footprinting exhibited a protected region that extends over more than 43 bp, covering a palindrome together with a direct repeat to one half of the palindrome and the nucleotides between them.

Allosteric Regulation↗

The Tn10-encoded Tet repressor blocks early but not late steps of assembly of the RNA polymerase II initiation complex in vivo.

We have studied the effect of the Tn10-encoded Tet repressor on expression from 13 cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S promoter derivatives that contain a tet operator sequence in various positions downstream of the TATAbox. When the operator sequence was inserted less than 33 bp away from the TATAbox (position +9 with respect to the transcription start site), the repressor interfered with transcription, whereas increasing the distance to 35 bp (position +11) abolished repression. This result indicates that initiation of transcription from the CaMV 35S promoter occurs in at least two different steps: (1) binding of transcription factors, involving sequences extending to position +9; this step can be inhibited by binding of the Tet repressor protein; and (2) initiation of transcription from this complex, which is not affected by the repressor protein. We suggest that the Tet repressor can be used to investigate whether transcription conditions in vitro truly reflect the in vivo situation.

DNA Transposable Elements↗

Transcriptional repression in eukaryotes: repressors and repression mechanisms.

For many, if not most genes, the initiation of transcription is the principle point at which their expression is regulated. Transcription factors, some of which bind to specific DNA sequences, generally either activate or repress promoter activity and thereby control transcription initiation. Recent work has revealed in molecular detail some of the mechanisms used by transcription factors to bring about transcriptional repression. Some transcriptional repressor proteins counteract the activity of positively acting transcription factors. Other repressors inhibit the basal transcription machinery. In addition, the repression of transcription is often intimately associated with chromatin re-organisation. Many transcriptional repressor proteins interact either directly or indirectly with proteins that remodel chromatin or can themselves influence chromatin structure. This review discusses the mechanisms by which transcriptional repression is achieved and the role that chromatin re-organisation plays in this process.

Chromatin↗

Expression, purification and crystallization of Aspergillus nidulans NmrA, a negative regulatory protein involved in nitrogen-metabolite repression.

The NmrA repressor protein of Aspergillus nidulans was overproduced in Escherichia coli and purified to homogeneity. Gel-exclusion chromatography showed that NmrA was monomeric in solution under the buffer conditions used. The protein was crystallized in three forms, belonging to trigonal, monoclinic and hexagonal space groups. Two of these crystal forms (A and B) diffract to high resolution and thus appear suitable for structure determination. Crystal form A belongs to space group P3((1))21, with unit-cell parameters a = b = 76.8, c = 104.9 A. Crystal form B belongs to space group C2, with unit-cell parameters a = 148.8, b = 64.3, c = 110.2 A, beta = 121.8 degrees.

Aspergillus nidulans↗

Gene activation by the AraC protein can be inhibited by DNA looping between AraC and a LexA repressor that interacts with AraC: possible applications as a two-hybrid system.

The Escherichia coli activator and repressor proteins AraC and LexA bind DNA as homodimers. Here we show that their heterodimerization through fused cognate dimerization domains results in repression of AraC-dependent gene activation by LexA. Repression also requires a LexA operator half-site located several helical turns downstream of the AraC operator. This requirement for a specific spatial organization of the operators suggests the formation of a DNA loop between operator-bound Ara/LexA heterodimers, and we propose that heterodimerization with the AraC hybrid provides co-operativity for operator binding and repression by the LexA hybrid. Consistent with a mechanism that involves DNA looping, repression increases when the E. coli DNA looping and transcriptional effector protein IHF binds between the AraC and LexA operators. Thus, we have combined the functions of three distinct transcriptional effector proteins to achieve a new mode of gene regulation by DNA looping, in which the activator protein is an essential part of the repressor complex. The flexibility of the DNA loop may facilitate this novel combinatorial arrangement of those proteins on the DNA. The requirement for protein interactions between the AraC and LexA hybrids for gene regulation suggests that this regulatory circuit may prove useful as an E. coli-based two-hybrid system.

AraC Transcription Factor↗

The NocR repressor-activator protein regulates expression of the nocB and nocR genes of Agrobacterium tumefaciens.

The NocR protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens was found to regulate expression of the divergently transcribed nocB and nocR genes of the pTiT37 nopaline catabolism (noc) region. Experiments using the firefly luciferase (luc) gene as reporter demonstrated that NocR represses and activates transcription from the nocB promoter in the absence and presence of nopaline, respectively. NocR also negatively autoregulates its own synthesis irrespective of the presence of nopaline. Regulation of expression of both nocB and nocR is mediated by binding of the NocR protein to the nocR promoter. A 12 bp symmetrical sequence, which lies 3 bp downstream of the -10 hexamer of the nocR promoter, was confirmed to be essential for binding of the NocR protein. Functional localization of the nocB and nocR promoters verified that they do not overlap at all, and that the interrupted dyad, at which NocR binds, is 137 bp upstream of the regulated nocB promoter. The in vivo and in vitro results described here and those published previously suggest that a novel type of regulatory mechanism, which may involve changes in DNA topology, controls gene expression in the noc operon of pTiT37.

Agrobacterium tumefaciens↗

The co-repressor mSin3A is a functional component of the REST-CoREST repressor complex.

The repressor REST/NRSF restricts expression of a large set of genes to neurons by suppressing their expression in non-neural tissues. We find that REST repression involves two distinct repressor proteins. One of these, CoREST, interacts with the COOH-terminal repressor domain of REST (Andres, M. E., Burger, C., Peral-Rubio, M. J., Battaglioli, E., Anderson, M. E., Grimes, J., Dallmanm J., Ballas, N. , and Mandel, G. (1999) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96, 9873-9878). Here we show that the co-repressor mSin3A also interacts with REST. The REST-mSin3A association involves the NH(2)-terminal repressor domain of REST and the paired amphipathic helix 2 domain of mSin3A. REST forms complexes with endogenous mSin3A in mammalian cells, and both mSin3A and CoREST interact with REST in intact mammalian cells. REST repression is blocked in yeast lacking Sin3 and rescued in its presence. In mammalian cells, repression by REST is reduced when binding to mSin3A is inhibited. In mouse embryos, the distribution of mSin3A and REST transcripts is largely coincident. The pattern of CoREST gene expression is more restricted, suggesting that mSin3A is required constitutively for REST repression, whereas CoREST is recruited for more specialized repressor functions.

Animals↗

Characterization of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus catM, a repressor gene homologous in sequence to transcriptional activator genes.

Two structural genes needed for catechol degradation, catA and catB, encode the respective enzymes catechol 1,2-dioxygenase (EC 1.13.11.1) and muconate cycloisomerase (EC 5.5.1.1). Catechol is an intermediate in benzoate degradation, and the catA and catB genes are clustered within a 17-kilobase-pair (kbp) region of Acinetobacter calcoaceticus chromosomal DNA containing all of the structural genes required for the conversion of benzoate to tricarboxylic acid cycle intermediates. catA and catB were transcribed in the same direction and were separated by 3.8 kbp of DNA. The 3.8-kbp sequence revealed that directly downstream from catA and potentially transcribed in the same direction were two open reading frames encoding polypeptides of 48 and 36 kilodaltons (kDa). Genetic disruption of these open reading frames did not discernably alter either catechol metabolism or its regulation. A third open reading frame, beginning 123 bp upstream from catB and transcribed divergently from this gene, was designated catM. This gene was found to encode a 28-kDa trans-acting repressor protein that, in the absence of cis,cis-muconate, prevented expression of the cat structural genes. Constitutive expression of the genes was caused by a mutation substituting Arg-156 with His-156 in the catM-encoded repressor. The repressor protein proved to be a member of a diverse family of procaryotic regulatory proteins which, with rare exception, are transcriptional activators. Repression mediated by catM was not the sole transcriptional control exercised over catA in A. calcoaceticus. Expression of catA was elicited by either benzoate or cis,cis-muconate in a genetic background from which catM had been deleted. This induction required DNA in a segment lying 1 kbp upstream from the catA gene. It is likely that an additional gene, lying outside the region containing the structural genes necessary for benzoate metabolism, contributes to this control.

Acinetobacter↗