SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “vancomycin”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 343 records · Page 19Linked to original sources

PubMed1999

Vancomycin binding to low-affinity ligands: delineating a minimum set of interactions necessary for high-affinity binding.

Bacterial resistance to vancomycin has been attributed to the loss of an intermolecular hydrogen bond between vancomycin and its peptidoglycan target when cell wall biosynthesis proceeds via depsipeptide intermediates rather than the usual polypeptide intermediates. To investigate the relative importance of this hydrogen bond to vancomycin binding, we have determined crystal structures at 1.0 A resolution for the vancomycin complexes with three ligands that mimic peptides and depsipeptides found in vancomycin-sensitive and vancomycin-resistant bacteria: N-acetylglycine, D-lactic acid, and 2-acetoxy-D-propanoic acid. These, in conjunction with structures that have been reported previously, indicate higher-affinity ligands elicit a structural change in the drug not seen with these low-affinity ligands. They also enable us to define a minimal set of drug-ligand interactions necessary to confer higher-affinity binding on a ligand. Most importantly, these structures point to factors in addition to the loss of an intermolecular hydrogen bond that must be invoked to explain the weaker affinity of vancomycin for depsipeptide ligands. These factors are important considerations for the design of vancomycin analogues to overcome vancomycin resistance.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2001

Evaluation of vancomycin use in a large university-affiliated hospital in eastern France in 1999.

OBJECTIVE: In 1999, we conducted a retrospective drug utilization review to determine the volume and pattern of vancomycin use in a university-affiliated hospital in eastern France. METHODS: Total vancomycin use was determined and expressed as vancomycin courses per 100 admitted patients and defined daily doses (DDD) of vancomycin per 100 patient-days. The indication for vancomycin use was classified as appropriate or inappropriate according to the guidelines issues by the HICPAC. RESULTS: A total of 311 vancomycin courses were given, as 2098 DDD, giving crude incidences of 1.17 courses per 100 admitted patients and of 1.19 defined daily doses per 100 patient-days. The frequency of appropriate courses was 66.7%. Of the 63 inappropriate courses of vancomycin, 39.7% and 28.6% were empiric therapy for nosocomial and community-acquired infections, respectively, 20.6% and 6.3% were specific therapy for nosocomial and community-acquired infections, respectively, and 4.7% were prophylactic. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that vancomycin use in our hospital resulted in a lower selection pressure than has been reported for US university-affiliated hospitals and that comprehensive programs to improve use of vancomycin are needed in our institution.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed1994

Vancomycin redistribution: dosing recommendations following high-flux hemodialysis.

Although increased vancomycin clearance has been reported with highly permeable hemodialysis membranes (such as polysulfone), failure to consider post-dialysis redistribution could lead to unnecessary dosage supplementation. In protocol 1, twelve hemodialysis patients admitted for vascular access thrombectomy received 15 mg/kg of vancomycin as surgical prophylaxis. Post-operatively, patients underwent high-flux hemodialysis (HFHD) for two hours using a Fresenius F-80 polysulfone dialyzer (QB = 417 +/- 49, QD = 800 ml/min). Vancomycin's intradialytic clearance increased 13-fold compared to the patient's endogenous clearance (120 +/- 59 vs. 9 +/- 8 ml/min, respectively) yet dialysate recovery indicated that only 17% of body stores were removed (179 +/- 70 mg). Although serum vancomycin levels decreased 33% during HFHD, vancomycin levels increased in all patients following dialysis and the post-rebound values reached 87% of the pre-dialysis concentration. In protocol 2, eight outpatients receiving maintenance HFHD with a F-80 dialyzer (Kt/V = 1.29 +/- 0.08) were given 20 mg/kg of vancomycin immediately following dialysis on Monday; pre- and post-levels were measured during the next three dialysis treatments. The predialysis serum vancomycin levels were > 7.5 micrograms/ml (9.7 +/- 1.0 micrograms/ml; range 8.0 to 11.0) in all patients the following Monday. Thus, vancomycin clearance is increased during HFHD, but redistribution post-HD minimizes changes in serum levels. We recommend a 20 mg/kg i.v. loading dose and subsequent doses of 15 mg/kg every seven days; to account for individual variability, weekly vancomycin levels should be drawn before dialysis.

Adult↗

PubMed1999

Vancomycin in Oregon: who's using it and why.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the proportion of vancomycin orders that are appropriate according to national guidelines and to identify targets for educational messages. DESIGN: Population-based study of vancomycin use in Oregon during a 3-week period. Survey of pharmacists, prospective flagging of vancomycin orders, and data abstraction from patient charts using standardized forms. SETTING: Nonpsychiatric hospitals in Oregon. RESULTS: Four (6%) of the 66 Oregon hospitals had pharmacy restrictions on initial vancomycin orders. Sixty-four (97%) of the hospitals participated in the study of indications for use; 293 vancomycin orders were reported; 3.8 courses were initiated per 1,000 patient-days. Indications for use were determined for 266 (91%); of these, 159 (60%) were deemed appropriate. Of uses for prophylaxis, empirical treatment of suspected gram-positive infection, and treatment of documented gram-positive infection, 57%, 56%, and 65%, respectively, were appropriate. Of hospitals with <250, 251-475, and >475 licensed beds, 65%, 58%, and 57% of vancomycin orders were appropriate. No single medical specialty accounted for >16% of inappropriate vancomycin use. CONCLUSIONS: Vancomycin was used inappropriately by physicians of many different specialties, in hospitals of all sizes, and in sundry clinical situations. The problem of inappropriate vancomycin use does not lend itself to solution by educational strategies targeted at specific subgroups; restrictions by hospital pharmacies may be required.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMed2005

Catheter-related vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia: clinical and molecular epidemiology.

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium organisms causing catheter-related bacteremia in patients with cancer. DESIGN: Retrospective case-control study. SETTING: University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, a tertiary-care hospital in Houston, Texas. PATIENTS: Case-patients were patients with cancer who had catheter-related vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia and control-patients were patients with cancer and vancomycin-resistant E. faecium gastrointestinal colonization without infection. RESULTS: Ten case-patients with catheter-related vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia were compared with 30 control-patients with gastrointestinal colonization by vancomycin-resistant E. faecium. Patients with catheter-related vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia were more likely to have required mechanical ventilation (P < .01), received total parenteral nutrition (P < .01), and had polyurethane catheters (P < .01) inserted in the femoral vein (P = .01). With the use of pulsed-field gel electrophoresis, 4 of the 10 catheter-related vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia isolates were genetically indistinguishable, whereas only 2 of the 30 control vancomycin-resistant E. faecium isolates displayed this same DNA pattern (P = .03). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that catheter-related vancomycin-resistant E. faecium bacteremia occurs more frequently in patients who receive total parenteral nutrition, mechanical ventilation, and femoral catheters.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Antimicrobial susceptibility testing of a clinical isolate of vancomycin-dependent enterococcus using D-alanine-D-alanine as a growth supplement.

Bacteremia due to a vancomycin-dependent enterococcus (VDE) occurred during long-term vancomycin therapy in a renal transplant recipient with underlying pancreatitis and a vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) wound infection and bacteremia. The VDE was isolated from blood during vancomycin therapy and grew only in the presence of vancomycin and D-alanine-D-alanine (DADA), a substance required for cell-wall synthesis. Colonies beyond the periphery of growth of the VDE around a vancomycin disk contained vancomycin-independent revertant mutants after 48 hours of incubation. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis of the VDE, revertant mutant, the initial blood culture isolate of VRE, and an autopsy isolate showed that the four strains were identical. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using standard macrobroth and microbroth dilution methods. DADA was used as a growth supplement for macrobroth dilution susceptibility testing of the VDE isolate. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were similar for the VRE isolate and the VDE revertant, which were both resistant to ampicillin, high-level gentamicin, ciprofloxacin, imipenem, vancomycin, and daptomycin, and were susceptible to fusidic acid, high-level streptomycin, rifampin, and a quinupristin-dalfopristin combination. The MICs of teicoplanin were 2 microg/mL or less and 16 microg/mL for the clinical VRE isolate and the VDE revertant, respectively. The autopsy isolate was resistant to all antimicrobials tested and showed a fourfold increase in MICs for quinupristin-dalfopristin compared with that of the original blood isolate. The VDE was susceptible to all drugs tested except vancomycin.

Alanine↗

PubMed1995

Bacteremia due to vancomycin-dependent Enterococcus faecium.

A recipient of small-bowel and liver transplants developed recurrent fever and polymicrobial bacteremia due to multiply resistant Enterobacter cloacae and an inducible VanB strain of Enterococcus faecium while receiving therapy with amikacin, imipenem, and vancomycin. These organisms could not be subcultured onto blood agar but did grow around the vancomyin disk on a direct-susceptibility test plate. Additional testing confirmed the strain as E. faecium, which would not grow in the absence of vancomycin. Growth around a disk containing D-alanyl-D-alanine was demonstrated. Spontaneous vancomycin-independent revertants were obtained at a frequency of approximately 1 x 10(-6). Two classes of vancomycin-independent revertants were obtained: one that was constitutively vancomycin resistant and one that was nonconstitutively vancomycin resistant. We hypothesize that the normal D-ala ligase is not expressed in the vancomycin-dependent strain; thus survival of these strains is dependent on expression of the VanB ligase, which produces a depsipeptide precursor that is resistant to vancomycin binding. This is the second reported case involving a clinically important vancomycin-dependent enterococcal strain. Awareness of the existence of these strains is important, especially when clinical and microbiological data are consistent with infection due to a fastidious or nutritionally-deficient organism.

Bacteremia↗

PubMed1991

Triple-combination penicillin-vancomycin-gentamicin for experimental endocarditis caused by a moderately penicillin- and highly glycopeptide-resistant isolate of Enterococcus faecium.

An in vitro bacteriostatic synergy between beta-lactam and glycopeptide antibiotics has been recently described against isolates of Enterococcus faecium moderately resistant to penicillin and highly resistant to vancomycin. The relevance of this synergy in a rabbit endocarditis model was evaluated. Penicillin was tested at low- (LoD) and high-dose (HiD) regimens, alone or combined with vancomycin and/or gentamicin. Compared with controls, after a 5-day treatment: LoD penicillin, vancomycin, gentamicin, LoD penicillin plus gentamicin or vancomycin, and vancomycin-gentamicin were not effective; LoD penicillin-vancomycin caused a small reduction of bacterial titers in vegetations that was strongly enhanced by adding gentamicin; HiD penicillin-gentamicin, the most effective regimen, was not significantly better than LoD penicillin-vancomycin-gentamicin. These results suggest that the relative in vivo inefficacy of penicillin-vancomycin might be related to the fact that this combination was poorly bactericidal, and the triple combination of LoD penicillin-vancomycin-gentamicin or the combination of HiD penicillin-gentamicin should be considered in the treatment of serious infections due to beta-lactam- and glycopeptide-resistant enterococci.

Animals↗

PubMed1984

Mode of action and in-vitro activity of vancomycin.

Vancomycin is a unique glycopeptide structurally unrelated to any currently available antibiotic. It also has a unique mode of action inhibiting the second stage of cell wall synthesis of susceptible bacteria. There is also evidence that vancomycin alters the permeability of the cell membrane and selectively inhibits ribonucleic acid synthesis. Induction of bacterial L-phase variants from susceptible organisms with vancomycin is extremely difficult, and such variants are unstable. Stable L-phase variants induced by other agents are susceptible to vancomycin. Vancomycin is active against a large number of species of Gram-positive bacteria, such as Staphylococcus aureus (including methicillin-resistant strains), Staph. epidermidis (including multiple-resistant strains), Streptococcus pneumoniae (including multiple-resistant strains), Str. pyogenes, Str. agalactiae, Str. bovis, Str. mutans, viridans streptococci, enterococci, Clostridium species, diphtheroids, Listeria monocytogenes, Actinomyces species and Lactobacillus species. There has been no increase in resistance to vancomycin during the past three decades. Enhancement of antimicrobial activity has been demonstrated with the combination of vancomycin and an aminoglycoside against Staph. aureus, Str. bovis, enterococci and viridans streptococci. The combination of vancomycin and rifampicin are antagonistic to most strains of Staph. aureus, though indifference and occasionally synergism have been shown, but is synergistic against strains of Staph. epidermidis. It shows indifference against enterococci. Vancomycin and fusidic acid are indifferent against Staph. aureus.

Actinomycetales↗

PubMed1997

Synergic activity of vancomycin-quinupristin/dalfopristin combination against Enterococcus faecium.

Clinical specimens were cultured, and the strains identified by the Vitek system as Enterococcus faecium were characterized by their DNA. The MIC vancomycin, quinupristin/dalfopristin and teicoplanin for each isolate was determined. Ten vancomycin-sensitive and ten vancomycin-resistant strains of E. faecium were tested. Quinupristin/dalfopristin at 0.25 x MIC and vancomycin at 0.5 x MIC separately as well as in combination were added to Trypticase Soy Broth tubes inoculated with a 24 h culture. The results obtained by determining cfu at 2, 4, 8, 12 and 24 h indicated that the combination of subinhibitory concentrations of quinupristin/dalfopristin plus vancomycin produced after 24 h, in vancomycin-resistant strains, a consistent degree of synergy. Synergy was observed up to only 12 h when similar combinations were employed for vancomycin-sensitive strains. Vancomycin-sensitive strains tended to be slightly less susceptible to quinupristin/dalfopristin than vancomycin-resistant strains.

Colony Count, Microbial↗

PubMed1999

Combined effects of vancomycin and imipenem against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) in vitro and in vivo.

Infectious disease caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) often develops in compromised hosts in whom a single administration of vancomycin is usually not effective. We assessed the combined antimicrobial effects of vancomycin and imipenem against MRSA growth in vitro as well as in vivo using a neutropenic mouse thigh infection model. Synergic and additive effects of the two drugs were observed for 34 and two, respectively, of the 36 clinical isolates of MRSA, as determined by the chequerboard method. For MRSA strain N, postantibiotic effect (PAE) values obtained in vitro were 1.9-2.6 h for vancomycin and 2.6-3.5 h for imipenem, while higher values of 2.7-4.4 h were obtained for the combination of vancomycin and imipenem. In vivo, a single administration of vancomycin at 1 or 2 mg/kg or of imipenem/cilastatin at 5 mg/kg produced growth curves similar to those in controls, with a suppressive time of 0 h. Imipenem/cilastatin at 10 mg/kg demonstrated a suppressive time of 3.1 h. Combinations of vancomycin 1 mg/kg plus imipenem/cilastatin 5 mg/kg, vancomycin 1 mg/kg plus imipenem/cilastatin 10 mg/k and vancomycin 2 mg/kg plus imipenem/cilastatin 10 mg/kg demonstrated suppressive times of 2.9, 3.9 and 5.2 h, respectively, indicating that combined administration was effective. Simultaneous administration of the two drugs was more effective than sequential administration. Thus, combined administration of vancomycin and imipenem/cilastatin proved effective for MRSA in vivo. The combined effects seemed to be synergic, since a single administration of either drug did not show anti-MRSA effects at the doses used in the combined regimen.

Animals↗

PubMed2004

Vancomycin-induced deletion of the methicillin resistance gene mecA in Staphylococcus aureus.

OBJECTIVE: To elucidate factors that contribute to the development of vancomycin resistance in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). METHODS: Forty-nine MRSA isolates were subjected to passage selection with vancomycin to isolate mutants with reduced susceptibility to vancomycin. One mutant was chosen for detailed molecular and biochemical characterization. RESULTS: Five vancomycin-resistant mutants (vancomycin MICs, 6-12 mg/L) were obtained in vitro from five MRSA parent isolates. Upon acquisition of vancomycin resistance, all mutants showed a concomitant decrease in oxacillin resistance. In one particular MRSA strain, selection for vancomycin resistance repeatedly produced deletions and rearrangements, including loss of the mecA gene. Pleiotropic phenotypical changes, such as yellow pigment formation, loss of haemolysis, thickened cell wall, increased resistance to lysostaphin and reduced cell wall turnover were observed in this mutant. CONCLUSION: Acquisition of vancomycin resistance in one MRSA strain triggered mecA deletion suggesting that this deletion, coupled to other rearrangements and/or mutations, may be responsible for the increased vancomycin resistance phenotype.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Vancomycin pharmacokinetics in infants: relationships to indices of maturation.

The relationships between steady state pharmacokinetics of vancomycin and various indices of maturation were examined in 11 infants (gestational ages, 27 to 40 weeks; postconceptional ages (PCA), 29 to 48 weeks). Vancomycin was administered as a 10-mg/kg iv infusion over 30 minutes. Serial blood samples were obtained over a dosage interval and vancomycin serum concentrations were determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Model-independent pharmacokinetic data analysis yielded values for vancomycin systemic clearance (CL), volume of distribution (Vdss) and half-life ranging from 0.032 to 0.484 liter/hour, 0.44 to 2.5 liters and 3.5 to 9.6 hours respectively. Stepwise multiple regression analysis indicated that PCA was the best single variable model to predict vancomycin clearance as described, namely: CL (liters/hour) = 0.0224 PCA (weeks) - 0.639 (r = 0.91; P less than 0.0001). Other more complex models using a combination of patient variables only modestly improved the ability to explain the variability in vancomycin clearance. Vdss was strongly related to body weight (r = 0.93; P less than 0.0001) Vdss = 0.563 weight (kg) + 0.052). Our results suggest that postnatal alterations in vancomycin disposition are related to maturational changes in body composition and renal function. These data also suggest that vancomycin doses smaller than those previously recommended may be used to achieve therapeutic steady state vancomycin serum concentrations during the first 2 months of life.

Aging↗

PubMed1996

Instability of standard calibrators may be involved in overestimating vancomycin concentrations determined by fluorescence polarization immunoassay.

Fluorescence polarization immunoassay (FPIA) is widely used to determine serum vancomycin concentrations, and it has been shown to over-estimate vancomycin concentrations in sera from renally impaired patients. This phenomenon has generally been thought to result from interference by vancomycin crystalline degradation products (CDP-1). In this study, we confirmed that serum vancomycin concentrations in various patients determined by FPIA were higher than those determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) or enzyme multiplied immunoassay (EMIT). However, the quantitative differences in the serum vancomycin concentrations determined by FPIA versus HPLC were higher than the CDP-1 concentrations, even when the cross-reactivity of FPIA to CDP-1 is assumed to be 100%. When the vancomycin calibrators for FPIA were stored at 4 degrees C for 30 days, their concentrations determined by FPIA and HPLC decreased by 14 and 20%, respectively, and CDP-1 corresponding to 20% of primary vancomycin was formed. When stored at 25 degrees C, the degradation of vancomycin was more marked. We concluded that not only the cross-reactivity of FPIA to CDP-1 but also the instability of calibrators may cause the overestimation of serum vancomycin concentrations determined by FPIA.

Aged↗

PubMed2006

Efficacy of linezolid versus vancomycin in the treatment of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus discitis: a controlled animal model.

STUDY DESIGN: A rabbit model was used to assess the efficacy of linezolid and vancomycin for the treatment of discitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). Nontreated controls were used for comparison. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine if there was a therapeutic difference between using linezolid and vancomycin in the treatment of MRSA discitis. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vancomycin is currently the gold standard treatment for medical management of MRSA discitis. Linezolid is a relatively new drug that has been approved for treatment of MRSA infections, but currently there is no research demonstrating its efficacy at treating infections of the disc space. METHODS: Twenty-four rabbits were inoculated with MRSA at two adjacent lumbar disc spaces via an anterior retroperitoneal approach. Six rabbits were to receive only pain medication and to serve as controls. Ten rabbits were assigned to a 5-day course of intravenous vancomycin, and 8 were assigned to a 5-day course of intravenous linezolid. Disc spaces were sent for quantitative culture after the 5-day treatment course. RESULTS: The mean culture growth for the disc spaces was not statistically different between the linezolid treated group and the nontreated controls. While vancomycin treatment did lead to lower bacterial loads when compared with controls, the reduction was not statistically significant. When bacterial counts for the vancomycin group and linezolid group were compared, vancomycin treatment resulted in less bacterial growth. This difference was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Linezolid is a clinically attractive alternative to vancomycin due to its mild side effect profile and oral bioavailability. However, in this MRSA discitis model with a short treatment course, vancomycin was superior to linezolid.

Acetamides↗

PubMed1986

Enoxacin compared with vancomycin for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis.

Enoxacin administered orally was compared with vancomycin administered intravenously for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis. The MICs and MBCs of both enoxacin and vancomycin for an inoculum of 5.0 X 10(5) CFU of the methicillin-resistant S. aureus strain per ml were 1.56 microgram/ml. With an inoculum of 10(8) CFU/ml, enoxacin at 6 micrograms/ml and vancomycin at 180 micrograms/ml resulted in similar decreases in numbers of methicillin-resistant S. aureus in broth. Methicillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis in rabbits was treated with enoxacin at 100 mg/kg orally every 12 h or vancomycin at 30 mg/kg intravenously every 12 h for 3 or 5 days. Enoxacin treatment for 3 or 5 days and vancomycin treatment for 5 days significantly reduced bacterial counts of vegetations compared with those in untreated control rabbits after 1 day of infection. Bacterial counts of vegetations after vancomycin treatment for 3 days did not differ significantly from those of untreated controls. Bacterial counts of vegetations in the four therapeutic groups did not differ significantly from one another. In uninfected rabbits single doses of vancomycin at 30 mg/kg administered intravenously achieved much higher concentrations in serum than did single doses of enoxacin at 100 mg/kg administered orally. Enoxacin had an elimination half-life in serum that was approximately 1.5 times longer than that of vancomycin. This study demonstrated that enoxacin administered orally is as effective as vancomycin administered intravenously for the treatment of experimental methicillin-resistant S. aureus endocarditis.

Animals↗

PubMed1986

Vancomycin enhancement of experimental tobramycin nephrotoxicity.

The influence of vancomycin on tobramycin nephrotoxicity was assessed in male Fischer rats. Treatment groups included controls receiving diluent and groups receiving vancomycin alone at a dosage of 200 mg/kg (body weight) per day, tobramycin alone at a dosage of 80 mg/kg per day, and a combination of vancomycin and tobramycin at the above dosages. All regimens were injected on a twice-a-day schedule. The animals were sacrificed on days 1, 3, 10, 14, 17, and 21. When compared with controls, animals receiving vancomycin alone exhibited no detectable renal toxicity. Compared with the case with controls, tobramycin alone was toxic, as manifested by lower mean animal weights, increased blood urea nitrogen concentrations on days 14 and 17 (P less than 0.005), increased serum creatinine concentrations on days 17 and 21 (P less than 0.005), and the presence of renal cortical tubular necrosis and regeneration. When compared with tobramycin alone, the combination of vancomycin and tobramycin caused earlier and more severe toxicity. By day 10, the magnitude of weight loss, the rise in blood urea nitrogen, and the increase in serum creatinine concentration were all greater in the rats given the combination of vancomycin plus tobramycin than in the animals given tobramycin alone (P less than 0.005). In addition, there was more proximal tubular necrosis and regeneration in rats given vancomycin plus tobramycin compared with those given tobramycin alone. In this animal model, vancomycin alone caused no detectable renal injury, tobramycin alone produced minimal proximal tubular damage, and the combination of vancomycin and tobramycin resulted in a greater degree of kidney injury than observed with tobramycin alone.

Animals↗

PubMed1987

Alanine aminopeptidase and beta 2-microglobulin excretion in patients receiving vancomycin and gentamicin.

The effects of vancomycin, gentamicin, and combination vancomycin-gentamicin treatments on alanine aminopeptidase (AAP) and beta 2-microglobulin (beta 2M) elimination in 30 hospitalized patients were assessed and compared with elimination in a control group. Twenty-four-hour urine excretion values for AAP and beta 2M were determined on treatment day 1 and day 5 for patients receiving the three treatment regimens and for the control group. AAP excretion values for the vancomycin-treated group were not found to be statistically different from those of the control group. Both the gentamicin and the vancomycin-gentamicin groups had statistically higher AAP excretion values on treatment day 1 as well as on treatment day 5 when compared with the vancomycin and control groups. AAP excretion on day 5 of treatment was highest for the vancomycin-gentamicin group. Overall, beta 2M elimination was variable in all treatment groups. Although the beta 2M values were elevated as early as day 1 in all treatment groups, they were significantly elevated only in the vancomycin-gentamicin group on day 1 and only in the gentamicin group on day 5 compared with the vancomycin and the control groups. AAP appears to be a sensitive indicator of renal tubular damage. The combination of vancomycin and gentamicin results in greater AAP excretion than does either agent alone.

Adolescent↗