PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Allergic Reaction”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Discrepant nasal and bronchial nitric oxide kinetics during early and late phase allergic reactions.

Late allergic reactions (LAR) following allergen challenge occur in different compartments. We studied the kinetics of nasal and bronchial nitric oxide (NO) in mild asthmatics after allergen challenge. Twelve males with intermittent asthma (28 yr, FEV1 97% of predicted, PC20methacholine <8 mg/ml) and known LAR after bronchial allergen challenge underwent nasal and bronchial allergen provocation using the same allergen separated by a washout of 3 weeks. Nasal and bronchial NO were measured before challenge, during early (EAR) and late phase reactions, and 24 h after allergen. The mean (sem) maximum fall of FEV1 at EAR was 31.9+/-3.2% (P=0.001), and 17.6+/-2.2% (P=0.004) during LAR. All patients developed nasal EAR (max. fall in nasal rhinomanometric flow 64.8+/-7.6% of baseline) after nasal challenge, and 10 patients demonstrated nasal LAR with a fall in nasal flow of 65.9+/-6.6% (both P=0.002, respectively). During EAR, there was stronger reduction of nasal (-19.2+/-6.2%,P=0.039) than bronchial NO (-6.9+/-5.2% of baseline, P=ns). In contrast, bronchial NO also tended to decrease during bronchial LAR (-8.8+/-6.8%,P=ns), while nasal NO slightly increased non-significantly (+17+/-10.8%, P=ns). After 24 h, bronchial NO was significantly elevated (+78.1+/-40.1%, P=0.039), whereas nasal NO was unchanged (+6.1+/-15.1%, P=ns). The intraindividual difference between bronchial and nasal changes of NO during LAR, but not EAR or after 24 h, was significant (lung vs. nose: -35.6+/-14.1% relative difference, P=0.039). Despite similar functional responses in nose and bronchi, nasal NO kinetics following allergen challenge differ from bronchial NO. The concise mechanisms accounting for this discrepancy warrant further investigations.

Adult↗

[Drug intolerance caused by pseudo-allergic reactions].

The symptomatology of allergic diseases may be imitated by non-immunological, so-called "pseudo-allergic" reactions. Phenocopies of any type of allergic reaction may occur. Pseudo-allergic drug reactions may be caused by the active components as well as by additives. Anaphylactoid pseudo-allergic reactions are of special clinical interest. Their pathomechanism has not been conclusively elucidated yet. Based on clinical and experimental data, we discuss some hypothetical mechanisms of a few compounds, always keeping in mind the possibility of allergic mechanisms not yet identified. For the diagnosis of pseudo-allergic drug reactions we need provocation tests, as skin tests are not possible, and routine in-vitro assays are not available.

Drug Hypersensitivity↗

[Allergic reactions to transfusion].

Frequent allergic reactions following transfusion are observed. Usually, they are benign but sometimes we observe severe allergic reactions. Adverse reactions may be brought about by least two mechanisms. First, immediate-type hypersensibility reactions due to IgE. Secondly, anaphylactic-type reactions due to interaction between transfused IgA and class specific anti IgA in the recipient's plasma. They are characterized by their severest form (anaphylactic shock). The frequency of severe reactions following the transfusion blood plasma is very low. These transfusion reactions are complement-mediated and kinins-mediated. Prevention of allergic reactions is necessary among blood donors and recipients.

Anaphylaxis↗

Tolerogenic role of Kupffer cells in allergic reactions.

Drug-induced allergic reactions (DIARs), including allergic hepatitis, cutaneous reactions, and blood dyscrasias, are unpredictable and can be life threatening. Although current studies suggest that DIARs are caused by immunogenic drug-protein adducts, it remains unclear what factors determine the susceptibility to DIARs. We hypothesized that most individuals may be resistant to DIARs in part because they become immunologically tolerant to drug-protein adducts in the liver, an organ with tolerogenic properties. Because animal models of DIARs are elusive, we tested this hypothesis using a murine model of 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB)-induced delayed type hypersensitivity reaction that is mediated by immunogenic 2,4-dinitrophenylated (DNP)-protein adducts. Intravenous pretreatment of mice with DNP-BSA led to its accumulation in hepatic Kupffer cells (KC) and induced immunological tolerance to subsequent DNCB sensitization. Tolerance could be abrogated by prior depletion of KC or induced in naïve mice by transferring a T cell-depleted, KC-enriched fraction of liver nonparenchymal cells from mice tolerized 1 month earlier by DNP-BSA pretreatment. These findings implicate KC as a primary and sustained inducer of tolerance against DNP-protein adducts and suggest a similar role in modulating allergic reactions against drug-protein adducts. Perhaps genetic and/or environmental factors affecting the activities of these cells may play a role in determining individual susceptibility to DIARs.

2,4-Dinitrophenol↗

[Incidence and prevention of allergic reactions following chemonucleolysis with chymopapain].

Allergic reaction following chemonucleolysis with chymopapain is responsible for half of all known complications of this treatment. Although the incidence of allergic reactions is comparatively low one should not underestimate the danger involved. If chemonucleolysis is performed under local anaesthesia, the risk of an anaphylactic reaction is reduced. If no pre-operative test methods are available, the patient risk can be considerably lessened by suitable premedication and by keeping anti-allergics within easy reach during intradiscal therapy. Exclusion of patients who have a previous history of allergy from chemonucleolysis will not result in additional safety. The specificity of the serological tests is very high, but their sensitivity and reliability in respect of prediction of an allergic reaction with positive or negative test result is comparatively low. They take up a lot of time (24 hours) and require skilled personnel trained in laboratory chemistry. The chymopapain prick test is simple to perform and the result of the test rapidly available (15 minutes). The danger of allergic reactions to the prick test itself is negligibly small, as experience has shown. At the present time no comparative tests are available between serological tests and skin tests in a large group of patients, so that we can say something about the reliability only on the basis of empirical data. Of the 352 test-negative patients investigated so far, none had an allergic immediate reaction to chymopapain. Even if we take the possibility of false positive skin tests into consideration, we believe that it would not be appropriate with a positive skin test to perform chemonucleolysis.

Anaphylaxis↗

Time pattern of allergic reactions to drugs.

Generalized, allergic reactions to drugs show time patterns different from those based on pharmacological concepts. We distinguish three types of reactions: acute reactions (reaction time (RT): 0-60 minutes), subacute reactions (RT: 1-24 hours) and reactions of the latent type (RT: 1 day to several weeks). In this study, allergic reactions in the strict sense are supplemented by reactions considered to be based on intolerance or idiosyncrasy to aspirin, pyrazolones, paracetamol, NSAIDs, quinidine, iodine-containing contrast media and some as yet not understood reactions to local anaesthetics. Out of a total of 23,935 drug monitoring patients with 32,317 hospitalizations in the clinical divisions of internal medicine at three Swiss hospitals during the 1974-1987 period, 951 patients with 1,040 probably or definitely drug-related events of the selected type were recorded. Ultimately, 287 patients with 310 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) fulfilled our selection criteria and were classified into six groups of syndromes (Table 1). (Of the reactions described as maculopapular rash, unspecified rash and special exanthema, only the 159 reactions from the 1985-1987 period out of a total of 889 reactions of this type observed during the whole study period were included in our secondary evaluation.) The total number of 310 reactions (100%) showed the following RT distribution: 36 (11.6%) were of the acute type, 13 (4.2%) of the latent type, 12 (3.9%) could be interpreted as two distinct possible types of reaction to different drugs, and for 3 (1.0%) reactions, the type of reaction was indeterminable. The majority of reactions, 246 (79.4%), were of the subacute type starting within 24 hours of the last drug exposure. Among the 36 reactions of the acute type, 7 events of acute severe dyspnoea were observed which seemed to be as life-threatening as anaphylactic or anaphylactoid shock. These hospital-epidemiological data are of interest for focusing basic research and developing further principles of drug safety.

Anti-Bacterial Agents↗

Adverse drug reactions in Sjögren's syndrome. Frequent allergic reactions and a specific trimethoprim-associated systemic reaction.

Trimethoprim-associated systemic reactions, including aseptic meningitis, have been reported to be very rare adverse drug reactions. Patients with Sjögren's syndrome have been overrepresented, but no epidemiological surveys of the reaction have been conducted. To study the overall frequency of adverse drug reactions, and especially trimethoprim-associated reactions, we interviewed 85 primary Sjögren's syndrome patients and compared the results with those of 45 similarly interviewed osteoarthritis patients. Antimicrobial allergy was more common among Sjögren's syndrome patients than in osteoarthritis patients (46% vs. 27%). Eleven Sjögren's syndrome patients (13%), but no osteoarthritis patient, had experienced at least a partial, non-allergic systemic reaction with trimethoprim. Of them five (6%) had had a full-blown systemic reaction including both chills/fever and headache/backache and at least one of the following: malaise, vomiting, dizziness, confusion or meningeal irritation. Our findings confirm that allergic reactions to antimicrobials are frequent in Sjögren's syndrome. In addition to allergic reactions Sjögren's syndrome patients are prone to a specific trimethoprim-associated systemic reaction. This should be remembered when prescribing antimicrobials.

Adult↗

Allergic reactions to insulin.

Allergic reactions to insulin, although very common, are usually mild and self-limited. Many persistent effects can be corrected by simple means available to the discerning physician. In a few patients, however, they are severe and cause extreme morbidity or even mortality. These patients need to be recognized promptly and alternate means of managing their diabetes rapidly instituted.

Drug Hypersensitivity↗

Emergency treatment of allergic reactions to Hymenoptera stings.

Allergic reactions to Hymenoptera stings are frequently observed all over Europe. Rarely they may induce long-standing morbidity or even be fatal. Several investigations have shown that the emergency treatment given to these patients is often inadequate. Cutaneous symptoms respond well to antihistamines and also to adrenaline. Adrenaline is the mainstay for outside hospital treatment of more severe reactions involving the respiratory tract (bronchial asthma, laryngeal oedema) and the cardiovascular system (anaphylactic shock). Inhaled adrenaline is especially useful in respiratory symptoms, while parenteral application of adrenaline is prefered for shock treatment. All patients with severe respiratory or cardiovascular reactions must be hospitalized, treated under intensive care conditions and observed for at least 24 hr. Emergency medications including adrenaline for inhalation or for self-injection must be given to all patients with a history of systemic allergic reactions to hymenoptera stings. These patients must also get instructions for safety measures to avoid further stings. They should be referred to an allergist in order to evaluate the indication for venom immunotherapy.

Anaphylaxis↗

Allergic reactions to drugs: implications for perioperative care.

Clinically, one must be able to differentiate between an allergic reaction and an adverse reaction. Clinical manifestations of allergic reactions range from urticaria and rash to bronchoconstriction, laryngeal edema, hematologic disorders, and other serious reactions. Many drugs administered in the perioperative setting can cause allergic reactions. Antibiotics such as penicillins, beta-lactam antibiotics, and sulfonamides are the most common class of drugs that produce allergic reactions. A detailed allergy history is important when deciding if a patient can receive a drug that may cross-react (eg, a cephalosporin in a patient with a penicillin allergy). Vancomycin can cause a reaction that ranges from erythema and pruritus to clinically significant hypotension. Proper dilution and rate of administration are essential in minimizing the histamine from vancomycin that is thought to produce this reaction. "Sulfa allergy" describes an allergy to sulfonamide antibiotics; a patient with a "sulfa allergy" is not allergic to drugs containing sulfur, sulfites, or sulfates. Although true allergic reactions to opioids are rare, naturally occurring compounds like morphine and codeine can cause allergic reactions. After stopping the offending drug, mild allergic reactions can be managed with diphenhydramine, with or without a steroid. Significant allergic reactions require more aggressive management with oxygen, intravenous fluids, epinephrine, and histamine blockers.

Drug Hypersensitivity↗

[[Effect of traxanox sodium on type I-IV allergic reactions. Studies on anti-allergic agents VII].

The 48-hour passive cutaneous anaphylaxis (PCA) and passive anaphylactic bronchoconstriction in rats induced by an IgE-like antibody against DNP-Ascaris were inhibited by intravenous treatment with traxanox sodium in a dose dependent manner. In both experiments, traxanox sodium was more potent than disodium cromoglycate (DSCG), especially as an inhibitor of bronchial anaphylaxis. In the PCA test of rats using a double sensitization technique according to the Orr's method, traxanox sodium was demonstrated not to inhibit antigen-antibody combination, but to inhibit the release of chemical mediators at a stage following antigen-antibody combination. Traxanox sodium inhibited the complement dependent immune hemolysis, but not the hypotonic hemolysis in vitro. However it failed to inhibit the Forssman anaphylaxis in the guinea pig in vivo. Traxanox sodium (50-250 mg/kg p.o.) showed an inhibitory effect on the direct passive Arthus reaction (DPAR) of the rats. Furthermore, it delayed the onset of the hyperacute form of experimental allergic encephalomyelitis (EAE) and reduced mortality in the rats. DSCG was less effective on DPAR and EAE. In conclusion, traxanox sodium is considered to have a wider spectrum of anti-allergic activity than DSCG since it has a suppressive effect not only on the type I allergic reaction, but also on the type III and IV allergic reactions.

Anaphylaxis↗

Direct in vivo monitoring of acute allergic reactions in human conjunctiva.

Immediate allergic reactions are initiated by allergen-induced, specific IgE-mediated mast cell degranulation and involve leukocyte recruitment into the inflamed site. We compared conjunctival signs, symptoms, and in vivo leukocyte rolling and extravasation into sites of inflammation in five patients allergic to birch pollen and in 10 nonallergic controls who received a challenge to birch allergen or histamine. Both the specific allergen in allergic patients and histamine, both in patients and in healthy controls, induced symptoms and signs of an immediate allergic reaction together with leukocyte rolling within the conjunctival blood vessels. However, only allergen, not histamine, caused leukocyte extravasation into the site of inflammation in the allergic patients. Allergen also increased expression of endothelial P-selectin in conjunctival vessels and slowed the rolling of leukocytes which is required for their extravasation from blood circulation into the target tissue. Finally, i.v. heparin strongly reduced the number of slowly rolling cells during allergen- or histamine-induced reactions and this can probably hinder the leukocyte extravasation after allergen exposure. These findings suggest that slow rolling is required for leukocyte extravasation in acute allergic reactions, and it can be inhibited by heparin in vivo in therapeutically relevant conditions.

Acute Disease↗

Self-reported allergic reactions to peanut on commercial airliners.

BACKGROUND: Allergic reactions to food occurring on commercial airlines have not been systematically characterized. OBJECTIVE: We sought to describe the clinical characteristics of allergic reactions to peanuts on airplanes. METHODS: Participants in the National Registry of Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy who indicated an allergic reaction while on a commercial airliner were interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: Sixty-two of 3704 National Registry of Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy participants indicated a reaction on an airplane; 42 of 48 patients or parental surrogates contacted confirmed the reaction began on the airplane (median age of affected subject, 2 years; range, 6 months to 50 years). Of these, 35 reacted to peanuts (4 were uncertain of exposure) and 7 to tree nuts, although 3 of these 7 reacted to substances that may have also contained peanut. Exposures occurred by ingestion (20 subjects), skin contact (8 subjects), and inhalation (14 subjects). Reactions generally occurred within 10 minutes of exposure (32 of 42 subjects), and reaction severity correlated with exposure route (ingestion > inhalation > skin). The causal food was generally served by the airline (37 of 42 subjects). Medications were given in flight to 19 patients (epinephrine to 5) and to an additional 14 at landing/gate return (including epinephrine to 1 and intravenous medication to 2), totaling 79% treated. Flight crews were notified in 33% of reactions. During inhalation reactions as a result of peanut allergy, greater than 25 passengers were estimated to be eating peanuts at the time of the reaction. Initial symptoms generally involved the upper airway, with progression to the skin or further lower respiratory reactions (no gastrointestinal symptoms). CONCLUSIONS: Allergic reactions to peanuts and tree nuts caused by accidental ingestion, skin contact, or inhalation occur during commercial flights, but airline personnel are usually not notified. Reactions can be severe, requiring medications, including epinephrine.

Aerospace Medicine↗

Nonfatal systemic allergic reactions induced by skin testing and immunotherapy.

Skin testing and immunotherapy with allergens can induce systemic allergic reactions. In order to identify factors associated with systemic allergic reactions, a prospective study was conducted from 1976-1989 with more than 10,000 patients being tested and a total of 513,368 injections being recorded. Our study showed that the probability of inducing systemic allergic reactions by skin testing was less than 0.02% and the probability of systemic allergic reactions caused by immunotherapy was 2.9%. The female to male ratio was 3 to 2. The highest incidence of systemic allergic reactions was in patients between the ages of 16 to 39 years of age. The majority of systemic allergic reactions occurred when patients were on increasing doses rather than maintenance doses. More than 95% of systemic allergic reactions were associated with pollens and most of them happened between the concentration of 100 and 1000 PNU/mL. There was no increased incidence during grass or ragweed pollination seasons in those patients who received grass or ragweed injections during the respective seasons. Only 50% of systemic allergic reactions developed within 30 minutes after injections. The three most important factors determining the incidence of systemic allergic reactions are the type of allergens, the "rate" of increase of allergen concentrations, and sensitivity of the patients to allergens. The prick test at initial allergy assessment can be used to "rule out," with a high degree of certainty, the likelihood of systemic allergic reactions. The prick test is easy to perform and it is cost-effective. Prick tests and RAST together are helpful in identifying the patients and the allergens at higher risk of systemic allergic reactions.

Adolescent↗