PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, General”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1996

[Cerebral blood volume, cerebral hemoglobin and cytochrome AA3 during hypotension induced by prostaglandin E1 or epidural anesthesia under general anesthesia].

The effect of hypotension induced by PGE1 or epidural anesthesia under general anesthesia on cerebral blood volume (CBV), cerebral tissue hemoglobin, cytochrome AA3 was studied using a near infrared spectrophotometry in 20 patients undergoing abdominal operation. In PGE1 group (n = 10), CBV, cerebral oxyhemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxyhemoglobin (Hb) were unchanged during hypotension. However, cerebral HbO2 decreased and Hb increased slightly in a case of severe hypotension more than 40 percent of control, but CBV did not show any significant change. On the other hand, in epidural anesthesia group, HbO2 decreased significantly along with MAP reduction (r = 0.84) and Hb increased slightly. Cytochrome AA3 did not show any significant changes in both groups. From these results, we concluded that PGE1 drip infusion was better than epidural anesthesia to sustain the cerebral blood volume during hypotension.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

[Epidural anesthesia and general anesthesia using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway for an obese patient with Duchenne's muscular dystrophy].

Duchenne's muscular dystrophy is a genetic disorder whose features include abnormal responses to muscular relaxants and possible respiratory dysfunction after general anesthesia. The purpose of this report is to describe one management strategy used successfully to anesthetize an obese man with this disorder for atypical mastectomy. The anesthetic management during surgery involves epidural anesthesia using 2% mepivacaine and general anesthesia using the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Postoperatively 0.25% bupivacaine was infused for epidural analgesia. The patient was observed in the intensive care unit until the first postoperative day and showed an uncomplicated intra- and post-operative course.

Analgesia, Epidural↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Surgery of the carotid artery: locoregional anesthesia versus general anesthesia: Review of the literature].

The aim of the study was to compare locoregional and general anesthesia in carotid artery surgery in order to establish whether differences exist in terms of perioperative results, use of intraoperative shunts and costs. Seventeen studies, comprising 14,776 carotid endarterectomies performed with either locoregional or general anesthetic and published over the period from 1990 to March 2000, were reviewed. There were no statistically significant differences in the cardiovascular risk factors of the patients. Neurological morbidity and mortality were similar in the two groups, even if the use of shunts in the locoregional anesthesia group was lower than in the general anesthesia group and in four studies was associated with a significant difference (P < 0.01). No statistical differences in cardiac morbidity or mortality were found between the groups, except in two studies. Additional randomised prospective trials are needed in large numbers of patients. Locoregional anesthesia appears to allow a limited use of intraoperative shunts, but with neurological mortality and stroke rates very similar to those in the general anesthesia group. Routine use of locoregional anesthesia makes it possible to lower the cost of carotid surgery without sacrificing quality.

Anesthesia, Conduction↗
PubMed2006

Local/cervical block anesthesia versus general anesthesia for minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: what are the advantages?

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) under local/cervical block anesthesia (LA) is safe and effective for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (HPT). Advantages of LA versus general anesthesia (GA) for these focused procedures have not been clearly demonstrated. METHODS: Between 3/01 and 6/04, 177 consecutive patients with primary HPT and positive localization studies underwent MIP. Seventy-three (41%) had surgery under LA while 104 (59%) had GA. Primary endpoints were IV narcotic use, anti-emetic use, nausea, vomiting, and post-operative pain. RESULTS: Patients who had parathyroidectomy under LA were older (64 +/- 2 vs. 57 +/- 2 years, P = 0.001). Cure and complication rates were identical between the two groups. Patients who had parathyroidectomy under LA required less IV narcotic pain mediation (mean morphine equivalents 11.4 +/- 1.3 mg vs. 22.5 +/- 1.1 mg; P < 0.001) compared to GA patients. The LA patients had better pain control as shown by lower post-operative peak pain scores (2.9 +/- 0.3 vs. 5.0 +/- 0.4; P < 0.001) and lower overall pain scores (mean 1.9 +/- 0.2 vs. 3.1 +/- 0.2; P < 0.001). The LA group required fewer anti-emetic medications compared to the GA patients (mean 0.4 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.1 doses; P < 0.001). Fewer LA patients experienced post-operative nausea (16% vs. 49%; P < 0.001), and vomiting (7% vs. 24%; P = 0.002). Length of stay was similar between the groups (0.4 +/- 0 vs. 0.3 +/- 0; P = 0.22). CONCLUSIONS: In this study the choice of anesthesia did not affect surgical cure rate, morbidity, or length of stay. LA was associated with significantly lower post-operative pain, nausea, and vomiting. LA appears to offer specific advantages more than GA for patients undergoing MIP.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of three anesthetic techniques for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting: general anesthesia, combined general and high thoracic epidural anesthesia, or high thoracic epidural anesthesia alone.

OBJECTIVE: This study compared general anesthesia (GA), combined GA plus thoracic epidural anesthesia (TEA), and TEA alone in patients scheduled for off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting. DESIGN: Prospective, nonrandomized clinical study SETTING: University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ninety consenting patients undergoing beating-heart coronary artery revascularization with comparable coronary status and left ventricular function. INTERVENTIONS: GA (n=30) was conducted with propofol, remifentanil, and cisatracurium or combined with TEA (GA+TEA, n=30) or TEA as the sole anesthetic with ropivacaine plus sufentanil (TEA, n=30). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Groups were comparable regarding the surgical approaches and the number of anastomoses. Four patients (GA, n=2; GA+TEA, n=2) who required unplanned cardiopulmonary bypass, and 4 patients in the TEA group who underwent unexpected intubation because of pneumothorax (n=2), phrenic nerve palsy, or incomplete analgesia were excluded from further analysis. Intraoperative heart rate decreased significantly with both GA+TEA and TEA. None of the patients with TEA alone was admitted to the intensive care unit, they all were monitored on average for 6 hours postoperatively in the intermediate care unit and allowed to eat and drink as desired on admission. Postoperative pain scores were lower in both groups with TEA. There were no differences among groups in patients overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Based on the authors data, all anesthetic techniques were equally safe from the clinicians standpoint. However, GA+TEA appeared to be most comprehensive, allowing for revascularization of any coronary artery, providing good hemodynamic stability and reliable postoperative pain relief. Nonetheless, the actual and potential risks of TEA during cardiac surgery should not be underestimated.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Effects of epidural-and-general anesthesia combined versus general anesthesia alone on the venous hemodynamics of the lower limb. A randomized study.

Our hypothesis was that, due to its sympatholytic action, epidural anesthesia (EA) administered as part of anesthesia in abdominal surgery would generate a marked venous leg flow enhancement, thus aiding in the prevention of peroperative venous stasis. We studied, and comprehensively quantified the venous haemodynamic changes in the lower limb during and immediately after abdominal surgery performed under EA and general (GA) anesthesia combined, in comparison to GA alone. This is a prospective, randomized, controlled study, stratified for hypertension and smoking, comprising ASA 1-2 patients undergoing elective total abdominal hysterectomy. Those with peripheral vascular or chronic venous disease, prior DVT or BMI>35 were excluded. Eligible recruits received either GA (Group GA) (n = 10; age 36-65, median 50) alone or epidural anesthesia (EA) and GA combined (Group EA/GA) (n = 9; age 32-58, median 46). EA (L(1-2)) was administered using lignocaine 2%. Both groups had GA induced with fentanyl and propofol, maintained with N(2)O and isoflurane; larygoscopy was facilitated with vecuronium; analgesia was provided either with morphine (Group GA) or epidurally with 2% lignocaine boli (Group EA/GA). Hemodynamics were determined at the popliteal vein in the horizontal supine position at baseline (resting prior to anesthesia), post epidural (20 min after delivery of EA), post induction (15 min after laryngeal intubation), surgery (upon uterus removal) and recovery (30 min after extubation). There was no difference in the mean velocity[V(mean)] between the 2 groups at baseline (p = 0.35([Mann-Whitney])), and post induction (p = 0.5([Mann-Whitney])). However V(mean) was significantly higher in Group EA/GA than Group GA, both at surgery (point estimate[PE]: 1.8 cm/s; 95% CI: 0.01, 6.3 cm/s; p <0.05([Mann-Whitney])) and recovery (PE: 2.6 cm/s; 95% CI: 0.4, 5.1 cm/s; p = 0.02([Mann-Whitney])). Volume flow[V(Q)] was similar in the 2 groups at baseline and post induction (both, p >0.1([Mann-Whitney])), but was significantly higher in Group EA/GA at surgery (PE: 54 ml/min; 95% CI: 18, 159 ml/min; p = 0.045([Mann-Whitney])) and recovery (PE: 49 ml/min; 95% CI: 16, 129 ml/min; p=0.0037([Mann-Whitney])). Peak velocity, V(mean) and V(Q) increased significantly post epidural in Group EA/GA. Contrary to the venous leg flow attenuation in elective abdominal surgery under GA and upon its recovery, EA administered as part of GA is associated with a significant enhancement of both V(mean) and V(Q). This beneficial hemodynamic effect of EA at the vulnerable stage of recovery may be critically essential in light of enhanced blood viscosity, fibrinolytic shut-down, endothelial/platelet activation and immobility, acting in synergy with putative cardiorespiratory protection. The results of this study lend support to the preferential selection of combined EA/GA in subjects at high risk for venous thromboembolism, particularly when optimal DVT prophylaxis is practically unattainable due to limitations pertaining to the nature of surgery.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Chemonucleolysis. Peridural anesthesia versus general anesthesia].

A prospective comparative study was carried out between two anesthetic techniques for chemonucleolysis. Patients were divided into 2 groups of 50 patients each. Group A were submitted to general anesthesia and group B to epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine, 2% mepivacaine and buprenorphine. Group B was divided into 2 subgroups: in B1, buprenorphine was administered with the local anesthetics, while in B2 buprenorphine was administered postoperatively when pain appeared. Postoperative pain and side effects like anaphylaxis were evaluated. No anaphylactic reactions occurred. Severe lumbar pain appeared in 22% of patients in group A in spite of systematic analgesics, while group B lumbalgia was not severe in any case. Patients in subgroup B1 did not have pain during the 24 first hours and 47.8% of patients in subgroup B2 needed in most of the cases only a dose of buprenorphine. We conclude that epidural anesthesia is a good technique in chemonucleolysis and that the association bupivacaine, mepivacaine and buprenorphine provides a good postoperative pain relief.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

[Physiopathology of combined peridural and general anesthesia].

General anaesthesia alters self-regulation of arterial pressure by lowering the sympathetic tone to his baseline level. More important is the sympathetic stimulation before general anaesthesia, more important will be the decrease in arterial pressure after induction. Epidural anaesthesia always leads to a sympathetic blockade. The extent and the speed of appearance of this blockade condition the magnitude of the decrease of arterial pressure. So, general anaesthesia and epidural anaesthesia both modifying deeply the autonomic nervous system, their association can only be performed on hemodynamically stable patients for a non hemorrhagic surgery. Correcting a deep arterial hypotension demands first of all the use of vasoconstricting agents the choice of which depends on the site of the epidural anaesthesia and on the cardiovascular condition of the patient. However, although the combined use of the two techniques is attractive, it does not seem to improve cardiovascular nor respiratory morbidities in high risk patients compared with classical general anaesthesia. Nevertheless, the high value of epidural analgesia may improve the postoperative course.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Paraplegia following intracord injection during attempted epidural anesthesia under general anesthesia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: A case of permanent paraplegia is reported following attempted epidural anesthesia for a total knee replacement in a 62-year-old woman with a history of lumbar laminectomy for a prolapsed intervertebral disc. METHODS: Epidural puncture was attempted during general anesthesia and neuromuscular block. RESULTS: After four unsuccessful attempts, an epidural catheter was inserted above the upper end of the laminectomy scar. Several episodes of arterial hypotension occurred intraoperative and postoperative. Operative blood loss was minimal, and no bone glue was used. The patient awoke paraparetic with a sensory level of anesthesia to T5 bilaterally. MRI revealed an air bubble in the cord at T10 and a region of increased T2-weighted signal in the anterior aspect of the spinal cord between T4 and T5, consistent with infarction. CONCLUSION: Standards of management are discussed in relation to this case.

Anesthesia, Epidural↗
PubMed2001

[General anesthesia].

General anaesthesia is a reversible loss of consciousness induced and maintained with a hypnotic drug given either by venous injection and infusion, or by inhalation. A potent opioid is usually associated to inhibit the transmission of pain and thus to lessen sympathetic and endocrine reactions to nociceptive stimuli. Myorelaxation is used to facilitate tracheal intubation and surgery. Whatever the anaesthetic protocol use, the patient and anaesthesia machine require close monitoring. In addition to vital signs, the depth of anaesthesia may be monitored using automated electroencephalographic analysis and myorelaxation should always be monitored using a nerve stimulator, but pain or analgesia evaluation is only based on clinical signs of sympathetic stimulation. Because anaesthesia-related death and morbidity have decreased considerably, future improvements in outcome should concern perioperative comfort, i.e. prevention of cognitive disturbances, nausea, vomiting and pain.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMedDate not supplied

[Advantage of combined spinal, epidural and general anesthesia in comparison to general anesthesia in abdominal surgery].

Type and technique of anesthesia have an important effect on per operative surgical course. The aim of the study was prospective analyses of advantages of combined spinal, epidural and general anesthesia (CSEGA) versus general anesthesia (GA) in abdominal surgery according to: 1. operative course (haemodynamic stability of patients, quality of analgesia, undesirables effects), 2. postoperative course (quality of analgesia, unfavourable effects, temporary abode of patients in intensive care). Using prospective randomized double blind controlled study, we evaluated two groups of patients whom the same type of abdominal surgical intervention was planed and the only difference was the type of technique of anesthesia. First group of patients (n = 34), was treated with CSEGA and second group of patients (n = 33), was treated only with standard (GA). Both groups had intraoperative and 24-hour-long postoperative continued monitoring of blood pressure, central venous pressure, and dieresis. In the 24 hours postoperative period, the following parameters were analyzed: vigilance conditions, motor block level, pain intensity in rest and movement, necessity for a complementary analgesia, side effects and final subjective effect of analgesia. There was important difference in waking up the patients after a general anesthesia--in the first group this period was shorter. In the first 24 hours, patients from the first group didn't get any systemic analgesic, while the patients from the second group needed fractionary application of parenteral analgesics in the period of 4-6 hours. Patients from the first group were also physically faster and easier recovered and they had less respiratory complications and there was not any example of thromboembolsm and the intestine motility was faster re-established. First group of patients spent less time in intensive care (three days) than second group (six days). Final subjective effect of analgesia, according to verbal descriptive scale (VDS) of pain was satisfying with 75% of patients of the first group and 15% of patients of the second group. According to results investigation, advantages of CSEDGA versus GA in abdominal surgery manifold: better hemodynamic stability and perfusion of operative region, decrease of single doses of opioid analgesics, local and general anesthetics followed by the decrease of their side effects, better intensity and longer duration of analgesia, improved total functional capability of patients.

Abdomen↗
PubMed1994

[Hemodynamic effects of genu-pectoral position during the surgery of lumbar disk herniation: spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia].

Spinal anesthesia (SA) for lumbar disk surgery in the genu-pectoral position (GP) has been proposed as an alternative to general anesthesia (GA). This study compares the haemodynamic effects of GP in two groups of patients undergoing either SA (n = 43) or GA (n = 40). Mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before and after GP. MAP and HR were significantly lower in the GA group after GP. We conclude that SA during GP for lumbar disk surgery is haemodynamically well tolerated.

Adult↗
PubMed2002

Frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or integrated epidural-general anesthesia for total hip replacement.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the frequency of hypotension and bradycardia during integrated epidural-general anesthesia as compared with general anesthesia or epidural anesthesia alone. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, open, multicenter study. SETTING: Inpatient anesthesia at 7 University or Hospital Departments of anesthesia. PATIENTS: 210 ASA physical status I, II, and III patients undergoing elective total hip replacement. INTERVENTIONS: Using a balanced randomization method, each hospital enrolled 30 consecutive patients who received integrated epidural-general anesthesia, epidural anesthesia, or general anesthesia. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Occurrence of clinically relevant hypotension (systolic arterial blood pressure (BP) decrease >30% from baseline), or bradycardia (heart rate (HR) <45 bpm) requiring pharmacologic treatment were recorded, as well as routine cardiovascular parameters. Clinically relevant hypotension during induction of nerve block was reported in 13 patients receiving epidural block (18%) and 16 patients receiving epidural-general anesthesia (22%) (p = 0.67). Subsequently, 22 of the remaining 54 patients in the epidural-general anesthesia group (41%) developed hypotension after the induction of general anesthesia, as compared with 16 patients of the general anesthesia group (23%) (p = 0.049). No differences in HR or in frequency of bradycardia were observed in the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: The induction of general anesthesia in patients with an epidural block up to T10 increased the odds of developing clinically relevant hypotension as compared with those patients who received no epidural block, and was associated with a twofold increase of the odds of hypotension as compared with the use of epidural anesthesia alone.

Aged↗