PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Anesthesia, Intravenous”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1998

[Anesthetic management by continuous total intravenous anesthesia].

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is one of the most recommended methods of anesthesia for the prevention of air pollution. But the intermittent administration of anesthetic agents has a disadvantage of elongating emergence time. When inexperienced residents undertake TIVA with larger doses of drugs to stabilize vital signs, it takes long emergence time. Therefore, we suggested a continuous TIVA with propofol, ketamine and vecuronium in combination with butorphanol (PKBt) or buprenorphine (PKBp). In this study, we compared emergence times in the subjects, who underwent general anesthesia with PKBt and PKBp. After induction with propofol (2 mg.kg-1), ketamine (0.5 mg.kg-1), vecuronium (0.1 mg.kg-1) and agonist-antagonist opioids, subjects in each group were maintained with continuous intravenous injection of propofol (2-10 mg.kg-1.h-1), ketamine (240 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) and vecuronium (80 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) in combination with butorphanol (8 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) or buprenorphine (0.4 microgram.kg-1.h-1). The emergence times were designated as Op time (the end of operation to awareness), Pr time (the end of propofol to awareness), and B time (the end of butorphanol or buprenorphine to awareness). The emergence times of Op, Pr and B were not different between the groups. The elderly patients showed longer B time than the younger. The patients with long anesthetic time showed longer B time than the patients with short anesthesia. The patients with general anesthesia combined with epidural anesthesia showed longer B time than the patients with only general anesthesia. But there were no differences in Op time and Pr time. We conclude that the continuous TIVA is useful to reduce emergence time and prevent air pollution.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocations: comparing intraarticular lignocaine with intravenous anesthesia.

Anterior shoulder dislocation is the most common dislocation in the body. Various methods of anesthesia are available for reduction. The objective of this study was to compare the application of intra-articular anesthesia with intravenous anesthesia for reduction of acute anterior shoulder dislocation. This study was conducted at Kathmandu Medical College Teaching Hospital (KMCTH) and Kathmandu Hospital and comprised of patients coming with anterior dislocation of shoulder from July 2001 to June 2005. Forty-five patients aged 17-55 years with no associated fractures of adjoining bones were included in the study. In twenty-three patients, reduction was done using intra-articular anesthesia and in 22 patients intravenous anesthesia was given. In five patients (three in intra-articular group and two in intravenous group) the reduction technique had to be changed to the Hippocratic method. In these three patients intravenous anesthesia had to be given after intra-articular anesthesia failed to relieve pain and spasm. In the intravenous group two patients had to be admitted overnight while in the intra-articular group none had to be admitted to the hospital. However, in the intra-articular group the average time taken from injection to reduction was significantly longer (<.001). The use of intra-articular lignocaine for reduction of shoulder dislocation is safe and effective especially when patients present early. In patients presenting late (more than 5 hours) intravenous anesthesia should be primarily considered as the method for shoulder reduction.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1999

[A clinical dose finding study of propofol in continuous total intravenous anesthesia].

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) is recommended in view of avoiding air pollution. However, intermittent administration of anesthetic agents has a disadvantage of delayed emergence time. We have suggested continuous TIVA with propofol, ketamine, vecuronium and buprenorphine (PKBp), and reported that the elder or the patients anesthetized for a long time show delayed emergence from continuous TIVA. In this study, after induction with propofol, ketamine, vecuronium and buprenorphine, the subjects were maintained with continuous intravenous administration of propofol corresponding to the age using twice step down method with ketamine (240 micrograms.kg-1.h-1), vecuronium (80 micrograms.kg-1.h-1) and buprenorphine (0.4 microgram.kg-1.h-1). Emergence was evaluated from the 2nd step down of propofol to awareness. There was a linear relationship between the emergence (2nd step down time of propofol to awareness) (Y) and the anesthetic time (X); Y = 0.175X + 3.00. We conclude that the last 1/6 (= 0.175) of anesthetic time is the point to reduce maintenance doses of propofol to achieve more rapid emergence.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2005

Comparison of hypotensive epidural anesthesia and hypotensive total intravenous anesthesia on intraoperative blood loss during total hip replacement.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare hypotensive epidural anesthesia (HEA) and hypotensive total intravenous anesthesia (HTIVA) with propofol and remifentanil on blood loss during primary total hip replacement. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized clinical study. SETTING: University hospital. PATIENTS: Forty ASA physical status I, II, and III patients presenting for primary total hip replacement. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received either HEA with bupivacaine (HEA group, n = 20) or HTIVA with propofol and remifentanil (HTIVA group, n = 20) to maintain mean arterial pressure between 50 and 60 mm Hg. MEASUREMENTS: Duration of hypotension, blood loss, blood transfusions, hemodynamics, and coagulation studies were recorded in both groups. MAIN RESULTS: Intraoperative blood loss, percentage of patients receiving blood substitution, and total packed red blood cells transfused were less in those patients receiving HEA than those receiving HTIVA (P = .001, .04, and .015, respectively). Mean central venous pressure was lower in the HEA group than in the HTIVA group intraoperatively (P = .019). Mean hemoglobin concentrations and coagulation studies were similar between the groups. Neurologic examinations of all patients were intact in the postoperative period. CONCLUSIONS: In spite the similar mean arterial pressure levels noted between groups, HEA results in less intraoperative blood loss than HTIVA during primary total hip replacement. This outcome may be associated with non-positive pressure ventilation, distribution of blood flow, and lower mean intraoperative central venous pressure in the HEA group.

Aged↗
PubMed1991

[Clinical study on total intravenous anesthesia with droperidol, fentanyl and ketamine--10. Effects of prostaglandin E1 on the hepatic and renal functions following prolonged surgery under total intravenous anesthesia].

Twenty one patients who underwent prolonged surgical procedures over 10 hours under total intravenous anesthesia with droperidol, fentanyl and ketamine were studied to evaluate post-operative hepatic and renal functions as judged by serum levels of GOT, GPT, BUN and creatinine. They were divided into two groups. Ten patients of the PGE1 group were given PGE1 at a rate of 0.035 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 during anesthesia, and the remaining eleven of the control group were not given PGE1. The two groups were comparable concerning, age, body weight, height, operation time and anesthesia time. In the PGE1 group, significantly more intraoperative fluid was given than in the control group. The blood loss was more but insignificantly in the PGE1 group than in the control group. There was no significant difference in urine output and the amount of blood transfused between the two groups. In both groups, post-operative s-GOT and s-GPT levels were increased significantly compared with pre-operative values, but there was no significant difference between the two groups. Serum BUN levels of the 7-10 the post-operative days were increased significantly in the PGE1 group, but those of the control group were not. These data suggest that our method of total intravenous anesthesia with droperidol, fentanyl and ketamine, when applied even for prolonged surgical procedure over 10 hours, would have beneficial effects on the post-operative hepatic and renal functions.

Alprostadil↗
PubMed1996

[Sedation, combined anesthesia, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with propofol in the pediatric surgical patient].

Total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA) has recently obtained a wide diffusion in paediatrics, thanks to the pharmacological properties of propofol. The authors make a review on sedation, combined anaesthesia and Tiva in paediatric anesthesia, particularly on propofol and its characteristics. They describe the practical use of TIVA with recent knowledge in this field.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗
PubMed1994

[Comparison between balanced anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia in videolaparocholecystectomy].

The aim of this work was to assess which anaesthetic technique is more suitable to the performance of videolaparocholecystectomy (VLC), particularly seeking for a faster and more comfortable recovery, although saving the maximum safety of the patient. A comparative investigation between two different anaesthetic techniques was carried out in 40 patients scheduled for VLC; the procedure's average length was 110.3 +/- 32.8 minutes and pneu- moperitoneum was obtained with 12-15 mmHg of CO2. Patients (32 females and 8 males, average age 52.3 +/- 8 years and ASA class 1, 2, 3, were randomized in two groups. The first group was administered total intravenous anaesthesia (TIVA): propofol+ fentanyl+pancuronio bromide; the second one received balanced narcosis:TPS+ Isoflurane+Pancuronio bromide. The following parameters were monitored at set times: SAP, DAP, HR and EtCO2; statistical analysis was performed by analysis of variance. The quality of recovery was assessed by Steward's test and analyzed by Student's "t" test. The data obtained from analysis of the intraoperative parameters showed no significant differences between the two groups; on the contrary a statistically significant difference was found with regard to the quality of recovery (p > 0.5 at 5' from the extubation). Thus, the comparative study showed the efficacy and safety of both techniques, but TIVA allowed a faster and more comfortable awakening with shorter time to recovery of consciousness. This, together with the reduced requirements of analgesic drugs in the postoperative period and the lack of air pollution, seems to suggest that TIVA is to be preferred for laparoscopic surgery.

Anesthesia, General↗
PubMed1999

[Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine for carotid endarterectomy under somatosensory evoked potential monitoring--combination with intraoperative hypothermia].

We reported anesthetic management combined with hypothermia for carotid endarterectomy under somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. Anesthesia was induced by propofol, fentanyl and ketamine, and maintained by infusion of propofol and ketamine and intermittent injections of fentanyl. Perioperative hypothermia was induced by gradually reducing the temperature of a circulating water mattress underneath the body to 15 degrees C. Additionally, somatosensory evoked potential monitoring was performed and recordings were obtained immediately after induction of anesthesia, and before as well as during cross-clamping of the internal carotid artery. Rectal temperature was reduced to 33.7 degrees C when cross-clamping of carotid artery was carried out, but major changes between before and during the procedure was not observed. All procedures were done uneventfully and gradual rewarming was accomplished by electric blanket. No neurological deficits were observed following recovery from anesthesia. Total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, fentanyl and ketamine may be useful for carotid endarterectomy under hypothermia and somatosensory evoked potential monitoring. This method may provide neuronal protection against ischemia injuries induced by cross-clamping of the carotid artery.

Aged↗
PubMed1990

[Awareness in total intravenous anesthesia].

After total intravenous anesthesia with propofol for suspension laryngoscopy the patient recalled intraoperative events. There were no obvious clinical signs during the supposed anesthetic course to warn the anesthetist that the fully relaxed patient might not be unconscious.

Adult↗
PubMed1994

[Neuroendocrine response in surgery: comparison between inhalation anesthesia (isoflurane) and intravenous anesthesia (propofol)].

The objectives of the study: 1) comparison between the two anesthesiological techniques both of which were applied to the various surgical groups (patients undergoing emergency surgery for abdominal pathologies and patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy); 2) a comparison between pre- and intraoperative stress levels. The experimental design consists of a comparative survey aimed at ascertaining the existence of statistically significant differences in pre- and intraoperative hormone levels (objective 1) and differences in hormone profiles depending on the anesthesiological technique used (objective 2). Patients were artificially ventilated; intraoperative monitoring included: automatic non-invasive AP every 3 minutes; cardiac monitoring; ETCO2; SaO2; all patients showed a normal postoperative evolution. A total of 30 patients were included in the study (mean age 34 years; ASA 1-3) 14 of which underwent bone marrow biopsy and 16 emergency surgery for abdominal pathologies; patients with hormonal pathologies or receiving treatment with drugs capable of influencing hormone response were excluded from the study.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1997

[Intravenous anesthesia by continuous administration of midazolam and fentanyl].

We examined the amount and method of administration of midazolam and fentanyl for intravenous anesthesia. Intravenous anesthesia was induced by intravenous administration of fentanyl 0.2-0.3 mg, followed by a minimal sleeping-inducing dose of midazolam, and then an additional 0.2 mg of fentanyl before starting the operation. To maintain anesthesia, a half dose of the first dose of midazolam was administered every hour, and a continuous intravenous injection of fentanyl at 0.08 microgram-1. kg-1.min-1 was also performed. It is suggested that these doses are the most suitable for obviating the use of antagonist. Also, by using a continuous administration, the dose of fentanyl can be reduced, and it is possible to stabilize circulation. Without the use of nitrous oxide during intravenous anesthesia, it is necessary to double the dose of fentanyl administered.

Adult↗
PubMed2003

Conscious analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol versus total intravenous anesthesia with fentanyl, midazolam, and propofol for outpatient colonoscopy.

BACKGROUND: This study tested the hypothesis that, for colonoscopy, analgesia/sedation with remifentanil and propofol might be more effective compared with anesthesia by intravenous administration of midazolam, fentanyl, and propofol. METHODS: In a prospective, randomized trial, 100 adult patients received either conscious analgesia/sedation (Sedation group) or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA group). Analgesia/sedation was achieved by infusion of remifentanil (0.20 to 0.25 microg/kg/min) and propofol in titrated doses. TIVA was induced by intravenous administration of fentanyl (2 microg/kg), midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and propofol (dosage titrated). Cardiorespiratory parameters and bispectral index were monitored and recorded. The quality of the analgesia was assessed with a Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NRS); recovery level and return of psychomotor efficiency were evaluated with, respectively, the Aldrete scale and a Modified Post Anesthesia Discharge Scoring (MPADS) system. RESULTS: Both groups of 50 patients were comparable with respect to demographic data, initial parameters, and duration of colonoscopy. All patients in the TIVA group found the colonoscopy painless (NRS score 0). In the Sedation group, the average pain intensity score was 0.4 (0.8). There was a marked difference between the Sedation and TIVA groups with respect to the time from the end of the procedure until the maximum MPADS score was reached: respectively, -6.9 (4.0) versus 25.7 (8.4) minutes (p < 0.001). In the TIVA group, changes in mean arterial pressure and heart rate and signs of respiratory depression were significant (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Combined administration of remifentanil and propofol for colonoscopy provides sufficient analgesia, satisfactory hemodynamic stability, minor respiratory depression, and rapid recovery, and allows patients to be discharged approximately 15 minutes after the procedure.

Adolescent↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Anesthesia for craniotomy: total intravenous anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil compared to anesthesia with thiopental sodium, isoflurane, fentanyl, and nitrous oxide.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare a total intravenous (IV) anesthetic technique based on propofol and alfentanil with a commonly used anesthetic technique for craniotomy. DESIGN: Open-label, randomized, clinical study. SETTING: Neurosurgical clinic at a university hospital. PATIENTS: Forty patients, aged 18 to 55 years, scheduled for brain tumor surgery. INTERVENTIONS: In 20 patients, anesthesia was induced with fentanyl and thiopental sodium and maintained with fentanyl, dehydrobenzperidol, isoflurane, nitrous oxide (N2O), and a thiopental sodium infusion. Twenty patients were anesthetized with a propofol loading infusion followed by a maintenance infusion at a fixed rate. In addition, alfentanil was administered as a loading bolus, followed by a variable-rate infusion, with additional doses as necessary to maintain hemodynamic stability. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A decrease in blood pressure (BP) after induction with thiopental sodium was followed by a significant increase in BP and heart rate (HR) during intubation. BP and HR did not change during the propofol loading infusion. However, the administration of alfentanil was followed by a similar decrease in BP with a return to baseline values during the intubation period. Return of normal orientation (7 +/- 5 minutes vs 27 +/- 23 minutes) and concentration (12 +/- 12 minutes vs 35 +/- 37 minutes) was shorter and more predictable for the propofol-alfentanil-treated patients than for the thiopental sodium patients. Maintenance propofol concentration (nine patients) was between 3 +/- 0.69 micrograms/ml and 3.36 +/- 1.17 micrograms/ml, while the concentration at awakening was 1.09 microgram/ml. Alfentanil concentration at extubation (nine patients) was 79 +/- 34 ng/ml. CONCLUSION: A total IV anesthetic technique with propofol and alfentanil is a valuable alternative to a more commonly used technique based on thiopental sodium, N2O, fentanyl, and isoflurane.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Effect of Xenon on elevated intracranial pressure as compared with nitrous oxide and total intravenous anesthesia in pigs.

BACKGROUND: Xenon in low concentrations has been investigated in neuroradiology to measure cerebral blood flow (CBF). Several reports have suggested that inhalation of Xenon might increase intracranial pressure (ICP) by increasing the cerebral blood flow and blood volume, raising concerns about using Xenon as an anesthetic in higher concentrations for head-injured patients. A porcine study is presented in which the effects of inhaled 75% Xenon on elevated ICP, cerebral perfusion pressure and the efficacy of hyperventilation for ICP treatment were compared with nitrous oxide anesthesia and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). METHODS: Twenty-one pentobarbital-anesthetized pigs (age: 12-16 weeks) were randomly assigned to three groups to receive either 4 h of Xenon-oxygen ventilation, nitrous oxide-oxygen ventilation or air-oxygen (75%/25%) ventilation, respectively. After instrumentation for parenchymal ICP measurement and ICP manipulation, an epidurally placed 6-F balloon catheter was inflated until a target ICP of 20 mmHg was achieved. After 4 h of anesthesia hyper- and hypoventilation maneuvers were performed and consecutive ICP and CBF changes were investigated. RESULTS: Intracranial pressure and CBF increased significantly in the nitrous oxide group as compared with the controls. There was no increase of ICP or CBF in the Xenon or control group. Intracranial pressure changed in all three groups corresponding to hyper- and hypoventilation. CONCLUSIONS: During Xenon anesthesia, elevated ICP is not increased further and is partially reversible by hyperventilation. Our study suggests that inhalation of 75% Xenon seems not to be contraindicated in patients with elevated ICP.

Anesthesia, Intravenous↗