PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Angiotensin II”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Activity of (des-Aspartyl1)-angiotensin II and angiotensin II in man. Differences in blood pressure and adrenocortical response during normal and low sodium intake.

This study was designed to compare the effect of [des-Aspartyl(1)]-angiotensin II ([des-Asp]-A II) and angiotensin II (A II) on blood pressure and aldosterone production in man under conditions of normal and low sodium (Na) intake. Seven normal male subjects in balance on constant normal Na intake (U(Na) V 160.3+/-5.0 meq/24 h) for 5 days received A II and [des-Asp]-A II infusions on two consecutive days; 1 mo later they were restudied after 5 days of low Na intake (U(Na) V 10.5+/-1.6 meq/24 h). Each dose was infused for 30 min, sequentially. During normal Na intake, [des-Asp]-A II from 2 to 18 pmol/kg per min increased mean blood pressure from 85.2+/-3 to 95.3+/-5 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 5.2+/-1.1 to 14.3+/-1.9 ng/100 ml. During low Na intake, the same dose of [des-Asp]-A II increased mean blood pressure from 83.7+/-3 to 86.7+/-3 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 34.4+/-6.0 to 51.0+/-8.2 ng/100 ml. In contrast, A II from 2 to 6 pmol/kg per min during normal Na intake increased mean blood pressure from 83.3+/-4 to 102.3+/-4 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 7.0+/-2.2 to 26.8+/-2.0 ng/100 ml; during low Na intake, A II increased mean blood pressure from 83.0+/-3 to 96.0+/-4 mm Hg and plasma aldosterone concentration from 42.0+/-9.7 to 102.2+/-15.4 ng/100 ml. A II and [des-Asp]-A II were equally effective in suppressing renin release. Plasma cortisol and Na and K concentration did not change. The effects of two doses (2 and 6 pmol/kg per min) of each peptide on blood pressure and aldosterone production were evaluated. During normal Na intake, [des-Asp]-A II had 11-36% of the pressor activity and 15-30% of the steroidogenic activity of A II. Na deprivation attenuated the pressor response and sensitized the adrenal cortex to both peptides, but the increase in steroidogenesis was greater with [des-Asp]-A II than with A II. The dose-response curves for [des-Asp]-A II with respect to blood pressure and aldosterone production were not parallel, and although no maximum was established for A II, [des-Asp]-A II was less efficacious.In summary, (a) [des-Asp]-A II has biologic activity in man, (b) [des-Asp]-A II is less efficacious than A II in stimulating aldosterone production, (c) Na deprivation sensitizes the adrenal cortex more markedly to [des-Asp]-A II than A II, and (d) dose-response curves for the two peptides differ, suggesting the possibility that they act at different receptor sites in vascular smooth muscle and the adrenal cortex.

Adrenal Glands↗

Effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin II antagonist saralasin on cell growth and renin in 3T3 and SV3T3 cells.

Components of the renin-angiotensin system were studied in established cell culture lines of 3T3 and SV3T3 mouse fibroblasts. The renin content in 3T3 cells was significantly higher than in virus-transformed SV3T3 cells. With time after infection, renin decreased in Simian virus 40 transformed cells, while it increased steadily in mock-infected 3T3 cells. In contrast to renin, angiotensinase activity was higher in SV3T3 cells. Angiotensin II stimulated cell proliferation in 3T3 mouse fibroblasts and decreased their renin content in a dose-related manner. In contrast, saralasin, an angiotensin receptor antagonist, inhibited cell growth in 3T3 and SV3T3 cells and caused an increase of cellular renin concentration. The angiotensin fragments angiotensin (2-8) heptapeptide and angiotensin (4-8) pentapeptide had no effect on cell growth. A significant negative correlation was found between cell proliferation and renin levels in 3T3 and SV3T3 cells irrespective of the treatment. Our results indicate (1) that angiotensin II may be involved in cell growth regulation, (2) that a negative feedback exist between angiotensin II added and intracellular renin content, and (3) that virus infection causes a decrease in intracellular renin synthesis, while non-specific angiotensinase activity is increased under this condition.

Angiotensin II↗

Relative biological activities of Asn1-,Val5-angiotensin II, Ile5-angiotensin II and Sar1-angiotensin II in man.

Biological activities of asn1-,val5-angiotensin II (Hypertensin, Ciba, Asn1-,Val5-ANG II), ile5-angiotensin II (human angiotensin II, Ile5-ANG II) and sar1-angiotensin II (Sar1-ANG II) were compared in man. In 7 normal men 5 pmol/kg X min each of Asn1-,Val5-ANG II, Ile5-ANG II and Sar1-ANG II was infused iv from 0900 h to 0930 h at 1-week intervals. Average increments of blood pressure at the end of the infusions were 11/12, 23/20 and 36/30 mmHg, respectively (significant differences among the 3: P less than 0.001), average decrements of plasma renin activity were 0.30, 0.32 and 0.27 ng/ml X H, respectively (no significant difference among the 3), average increments of plasma aldosterone were 1.1, 2.3 and 4.4 ng/100 ml, respectively (significant difference between the former 2: P les than 0.001, between the latter 2: P less than 0.02), and durations of blood pressure rise after the cessation of these infusions (T) were 2-5 (average 5) min, 10-25 (average 20) min and 35-60 (average 40) min, respectively (significant difference between the former 2:less than P 0.01, between the latter 2: P less than 0.001). From these results it is evident that the pressor and steroidogenic actions of Ile5-ANG II are significantly stronger than those of Asn1-,Val5-ANG II and that the duration of pressor action of the former is much longer than that of the latter. Therefore, when the activities of angiotensin II (ANG II) derivatives are compared with those of ANG II in man, Ile5-ANG II--natural human ANG II--should always be used instead of Asn1-,Val5-ANG II. The pressor and steroidogenic actions and T of Sar1-ANG II are significantly stronger or longer than those of Ile5-ANG II. The reason for this is thought to be that Sar1-ANG II is bound tightly to the vascular and adrenal ANG II receptors and is not readily metabolized.

Adult↗

Behavioral effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin II-(4-8)-pentapeptide in rats.

One nM of angiotensin II (AII) or angiotensin II-(4-8)-pentapeptide [AII(4-8)] given intracerebroventricularly did not affect locomotor and exploratory behavior of rats in open field. AII significantly increased and AII(4-8) did not affect vertical activity of animals in electromagnetic motimeter. Neither of the peptides influenced horizontal activity in the motimeter. Both peptides intensified stereotypy produced by apomorphine and amphetamine. AII significantly improved, while AII(4-8) did not affect, consolidation of memory of the correct way to food in T-maze. Similarly, AII increased and AII(4-8) did not change the rate of acquisition of conditioned avoidance responses in a shuttle-box. Of the two examined peptides only AII significantly improved retrieval of memory of the passive avoidance behavior. The results show that AII(4-8) influences central dopaminergic system but, unlike its parent peptide AII, has no apparent effect on memory.

Angiotensins↗

Influence of tissue freezing on the binding of 125I-sarcosine1, isoleucine8 angiotensin II to angiotensin II receptor subtypes in the rat.

Evaluation of angiotensin II (AII) receptor binding often necessitates freezing of the tissue of interest prior to assay of radioligand binding. This study evaluated the effects of freezing of various rat tissues at different rates on 125I-sarcosine1, isoleucine8 angiotensin II (125I-SI AII) binding to AII receptor subtypes. Slow freezing in a -20 degrees C compartment significantly reduced 125I-SI AII binding to AT1 receptors in the adrenal (51%), epididymis (34%), and liver (22%). Binding of 12tI-SI AII to the AT1 receptor in the brain was not significantly reduced. In the adrenal, both the Bmax and affinity of AT1 receptors were decreased by freezing. But in the epididymis, only the affinity of AT1 receptors was decreased. Binding of 125I-SI AII to AT2 receptors in the adrenal, epididymis, and brain was also not significantly reduced by freezing. Further evaluation of the mechanism of the reduction in 125I-SI AII binding to AT1 receptors in the adrenal indicated that both the receptor density and affinity for 125I-SI AII were decreased by freezing. Rapid freezing in a dry-ice bath caused even greater reductions in 125I-SI AII binding to AT1 receptors in the adrenal. Snap freezing in liquid nitrogen decreased 125I-SI AII binding in adrenals to a similar extent as did slow freezing. These results suggest that studies of AII receptors subtypes that involve freezing of the tissues underestimate the density and affinity of the AT1 receptor subtype.

1-Sarcosine-8-Isoleucine Angiotensin II↗

CGP 42112A antagonism of the angiotensin II and angiotensin II(3-7) facilitation of recall in rats.

An involvement of the angiotensin AT2 receptors in some behavioural effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) and its 3-7 fragment [Ang II(3-7)] in rats was studied. To inhibit AT2 receptors we used their selective antagonist CGP 42112A (nicotinic acid-Tyr-N-benzoxyl-carbonyl-Arg-Lys-His-Pro-Ile-OH). Ang II and Ang II(3-7), given intracerebroventricularly (i.c.v.) at the dose of 1 nmol each, significantly enhanced recall of the passive avoidance behaviour and learning of the conditioned avoidance responses (CARs). CGP 42112A (2 micrograms i.c.v.), inactive on its own in all tests, significantly attenuated facilitation of recall of passive avoidance caused by Ang II and Ang II(3-7). Also, CGP 42112A diminished Ang II improvement of CARs acquisition but not that caused by Ang II(3-7). None of the treatments produced significant anxiolysis in an elevated 'plus' maze. Likewise, in an open field no statistically significant differences were recorded except for the abolishment of the Ang II(3-7)-induced increase of rearings and bar approaches by CGP 42112A. It appears that the cognition improving activity of Ang II and Ang II(3-7) is mediated by similar mechanisms and angiotensin AT2 receptors are engaged in these processes.

Angiotensin II↗

Role of angiotensin II and angiotensin II receptors in vascular smooth muscle cell migration in vitro.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the biotic effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) on the migration of rat smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) and investigate the mechanisms involved in the development of vascular injury. METHODS: VSMCs isolated from aortic media of Wistar rats and cultured by the modified explant method were adopted. In the presence and absence of Ang II, the expression of Ang II receptor (ATR) and reorganization of the actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesion of VSMCs were studied by an immunocytochemistry technique and fluorocytochemistry technique. Migration assays were performed with a modified Boyden's chamber. The effects of AT(1)R antagonist (CV-11974), AT(2)R antagonist (PD123319) on the aforementioned target were studied. RESULTS: VSMCs migration was stimulated by adding Ang II. The dynamic reorganization of actin cytoskeleton and focal adhesions may be an important mechanism by which Ang II facilitates VSMCs motility. The expression of AT(1)R in VSMCs could be upregulated initially after treatment with Ang II, then decreased gradually. The expression of AT(1)R was downregulated by AT(1)R antagonists. The effect of Ang II on VSMCs migration was mediated by AT(1)R, while AT(2)R had no significant effect. CONCLUSIONS: The dynamic reorganization of focal adhesions and the actin cytoskeleton is required for Ang II-induced VSMCs migration. This effect is mediated by AT(1)R.

Actins↗

CGP 42112A abolishes facilitation of recognition caused by angiotensin II and angiotensin II(3-7) in rats.

The role of the angiotensin AT2 receptors in some behavioural effects of angiotensin II (Ang II) and its 3-7 fragment [Ang II(3-7)], using their selective antagonist CGP 42112A, was assessed. Ang II and Ang II(3-7), given intracerebroventricularly (icv) at the dose of 1 nmole each, substantially improved object recognition memory and enhanced apomorphine (1 mg/kg) stereotypy. Pre-treatment of rats with CGP 42112A (2 micrograms), per se ineffective in all tests, abolished activity of both peptides. None of the treatments significantly changed behaviour of rats in open field. The results point to the considerable involvement of the AT2 angiotensin receptors in the improvement of recognition memory caused by Ang II and Ang II(3-7).

Angiotensin II↗

Regulation of proximal tubule transport by angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II maintains extracellular volume homeostasis, in part, by regulating proximal tubule transport. Physiological doses of angiotensin II stimulate volume and solute transport in the proximal tubule independent of changes in the glomerular filtration rate. Stimulation of bicarbonate transport primarily occurs via increasing activity of the sodium/hydrogen exchanger and the sodium/bicarbonate cotransporter. The effects of circulating angiotensin II are mediated by angiotensin II receptors on the basolateral membrane of the proximal tubule. Recently, the proximal tubule was found to synthesize and secrete angiotensin II into the lumen. The luminal membrane contains angiotensin II receptors and luminal angiotensin II levels are 100 to 200-fold higher than that found in plasma. Luminal angiotensin II receptor blockade or luminal inhibition of angiotensin II synthesis both significantly diminish proximal tubule transport, consistent with stimulation of proximal tubule transport by endogenously produced and luminally secreted angiotensin II. These data provide evidence for an autocrine/paracrine role for angiotensin II that functions independent of circulating angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II↗

Renal extraction of angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II regulates many aspects of renal function and thereby influences long-term blood pressure. The effects of angiotensin II on the kidney have been exhaustively studied; however, the converse (i.e., effects of the kidney on angiotensin II) has received little attention. Accordingly, the focus of this study was to determine whether renal degradation of angiotensin II is regulated by chronic levels of angiotensin II or long-term levels of blood pressure. Twenty hypertensive rats and 22 normotensive rats were treated for 1 week with either vehicle, angiotensin II (50 ng/kg/min, subcutaneously) or captopril (100 mg/kg/day, orally). Right kidney vascular resistance was measured during infusions of angiotensin II into the left renal artery or vena cava at the level of left renal vein. Dose-response data were curve-fitted, and the extraction of angiotensin II by the left kidney was calculated by comparing the doses of angiotensin II required to elicit equal increases in right renal vascular resistance during intravenous versus left intrarenal artery infusions. Renal extraction of angiotensin II was high (mean, 81%) and demonstrated little animal-to-animal variation (coefficient of variation, 23%; standard deviation, 19%). Renal extraction of angiotensin II was independent of hypertension (P = 0.257) or previous chronic exposure to angiotensin II or captopril (P = 0.270), and there was no interaction between hypertension and chronic exposure to angiotensin II or captopril (P = 0.950). We conclude that renal degradation of angiotensin II is constitutively high, is unaffected by chronic levels of arterial blood pressure, and is independent of long-term changes in levels of angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II↗

Regulation of the renal Na-HCO3 cotransporter: IV. Mechanisms of the stimulatory effect of angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II stimulates proximal tubule acidification by activating both the Na-H antiporter and the Na-HCO3 cotransporter. The mechanism whereby angiotensin II stimulates the Na-HCO3 cotransporter was investigated in renal cortical basolateral membrane vesicles of the rabbit by measuring 22Na uptake in the presence of HCO3 and gluconate. Na-HCO3 cotransporter activity (expressed in nanomoles per milligram of protein per 3 s) was taken as the difference in 22Na uptake in the presence of HCO3 and gluconate. Angiotensin II stimulated Na-HCO3 cotransporter activity significantly (control, 1.5 +/- 0.4; angiotensin II, 3.3 +/- 0.6; P < 0.05), and this stimulation was prevented by the angiotensin II receptor antagonist DuP 753. Angiotensin II has been shown to stimulate both pertussis toxin-sensitive Gi protein and pertussis toxin-insensitive Gq protein. In the presence of pertussis toxin, angiotensin II (10(-11) M) failed to stimulate the Na-HCO3 cotransporter, suggesting a role of Gi protein in mediating this effect. In the presence of a polyclonal antibody against Gi protein, angiotensin II failed to stimulate the Na-HCO3 cotransporter (control, 1.6 +/- 0.4; angiotensin II, 3.9 +/- 0.9; angiotensin II + Gi, 1.2 +/- 0.7). Angiotensin II stimulated inositol triphosphate release, and this effect could be blocked by the phospholipase C inhibitor U73122, suggesting a role of phospholipase C or A2 in this effect of angiotensin II. In the presence of the protein kinase C inhibitor calphostin C (50 nM), angiotensin II also failed to stimulate the Na-HCO3 cotransporter. These results demonstrate that angiotensin II stimulates the renal Na-HCO3 cotransporter by interacting with a specific angiotensin II receptor and that this stimulation is mediated by the activation of Gi and Gq proteins.

Angiotensin II↗

A dose-response comparison of the actions of angiotensin II and angiotensin III in sheep.

Comparisons of aldosterone responses to [des-Asp1]-angiotensin II and angiotensin II, often at single dose levels, have shown a wide range of potency ratios. Therefore four-point dose-response comparisons were performed in sodium-replete sheep, using i.v. infusion rates of angiotension II and angiotensin II amide that reproduced the physiological range of blood concentration of angiotensin II for sheep. Angiotensin III was infused i.v. at the same rates. Effects on arterial blood pressure, cortisol secretion rate, adrenal blood flow and plasma levels of NA+ and K+ were also compared. The potency ratio, angiotensin III : angiotensin II amide, was 0.87 for actual aldosterone secretion rate and 0.90 for the calculated increase in aldosterone secretion. For angiotensin III : angiotensin II the ratios were 0.80 and 0.91 respectively. These ratios were not significantly different from 1.00 but the tendency for angiotensin II to be slightly more potent was probably due to a contribution from derived angiotensin III during infusion of angiotensin II. Angiotensin II or angiotensin II amide was approximately four times as potent as angiotensin III in raising arterial blood pressure. Cortisol secretion rate was slightly but significantly increased by all peptides at the higher infusion rates. Infusions had no effect on adrenal blood flow or plasma levels of Na+ but raised plasma levels of K+ slightly. These results confirm the conclusion from adrenal arterial infusion experiments that angiotensin II and III are almost equipotent in stimulating aldosterone secretion in sheep.

Aldosterone↗

Acceleration of dermal tissue repair by angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II is a naturally occurring peptide which has been shown to possess angiogenic properties. In the studies reported here, angiotensin II was shown to increase the proliferation of cultured bovine aortic arch endothelial cells in a concentration-dependent manner. Acute administration of angiotensin II in Hydron accelerated the repair of dermal injuries in a full-thickness excisional rat model. Additional studies were done to determine the best vehicle for delivery of angiotensin II to a dermal injury. Several vehicles, including 10% low-viscosity carboxymethyl cellulose, 4% medium-viscosity carboxymethyl cellulose, and 3% high-viscosity carboxymethyl cellulose, were found to be effective in this regard. Daily administration of angiotensin II for days 0 to 4 after injury (day 0 being the time of surgery) was determined to provide the optimal dosage for acceleration of wound repair by angiotensin II. In addition, dose-response studies indicated that angiotensin II accelerated wound repair in a dose-dependent fashion with 0.03 and 0.01 microg/rat/day of angiotensin II administered on days 0 to 4 being the minimally effective and no-effect doses, respectively. Administration of 100 microg/day of angiotensin II in 10% carboxymethyl cellulose for 5 days after injury to animals with impaired healing (steroid- and adriamycin-treated rats and diabetic mice) was also found to accelerate the rate of repair. In conclusion, angiotensin II accelerated the closure of full-thickness skin injuries in a dose-dependent manner in normal and impaired animal models.

Journal Article↗

Evidence that [Sar1]angiotensin II behaves differently from angiotensin II at angiotensin AT1 receptors in rabbit aorta.

Three peptide analogues, [Sar1]angiotensin II, angiotensin II and [Asn1, Val5]angiotensin II, that act at angiotensin AT1 receptors were compared in an isolated rabbit aorta assay. Significant differences have been found among them in agonist profiles and agonist-antagonist interactions with losartan, a nonpeptide antagonist selective for AT1 receptors. Most significantly, underestimation of the antagonist potency for losartan with a flat Schild plot was obtained with [Sar1]angiotensin II. These findings were confirmed in further examinations with representative peptide antagonists including [Sar1,Ala8]angiotensin II. The failure of PD123177, a nonpeptide antagonist selective for AT2 binding sites, to induce any significant difference in the complex antagonism of [Sar1,Phe(Br5)8]angiotensin II to angiotensin II appeared to rule out significant involvement of AT2 binding sites in the differences observed among the agonists, as well as in the complex antagonism. On the basis of the present findings it is speculated that either a saturable agonist removal process or heterogeneous sub-populations of AT1 receptors may be involved.

Angiotensin II↗

Competitive antagonism of pressor responses to angiotensin II and angiotensin III by the angiotensin II-1 receptor ligand losartan.

Losartan (DuP 753) and PD123177 are nonpeptide angiotensin (ANG) receptor ligands for subtypes of ANG II receptors ANG II-1 and ANG II-2, respectively. We examined the effects of losartan and PD123177 on dose - mean arterial pressure (MAP) response curves for ANG II and ANG III in eight groups (n = 6 each) of conscious rats. Saline (0.9% NaCl), losartan (1 x 10(-6) and 9 x 10(-6) mol/kg), and PD123177 (2 x 10(-5) mol/kg) were i.v. bolus injected 15 min before the construction of ANG II dose - response curves in groups I, II, III, and IV, respectively. Groups V-VIII were treated similarly to I-IV except that ANG III was given in place of ANG II. Losartan dose dependently shifted the dose-response curves of ANG II and ANG III to the right with similar dissociation constants (-log KI of 6.6 +/- 0.7 and 6.6 +/- 0.1 mol/kg, respectively) and no change in the maxima. PD123177 affected neither maximum MAP nor ED50 values for ANG II or ANG III. Our results show that losartan but not PD123177 is a competitive antagonist of the MAP effects of ANG II and ANG III.

Angiotensin II↗

Role for protein kinase C in the modulation of glomerular PGE2 production by angiotensin II.

Angiotensin II increased PGE2 release from superfused glomeruli, and stimulated labeled inositol phosphate production. 12-O-Tetradecanoyl phorbol -13-acetate (TPA, 10(-7) M), which stimulates protein kinase C activity in soluble fractions of glomerular homogenates, suppressed angiotensin II actions on inositol phosphate production and PGE2. By contrast, 4a phorbol 12,13 di-decanoate and phorbol had no effect on protein kinase C activity or angiotensin II induced increases in inositol phosphate or PGE2. 1-(5-Isoquinolinyl)-2-methylpiperazine (H-7), which inhibits protein kinase C activity in soluble fractions of glomerular homogenates, prevented TPA induced suppression of angiotensin II actions on inositol phosphate production and PGE2. Moreover H-7 prolonged the time course of angiotensin II induced inositol phosphate production and enhanced angiotensin II actions on glomerular PGE2 production. The results support a role for inositol phospholipid hydrolysis through the phospholipase C pathway in the mediation of angiotensin II actions on PGE2 in glomeruli and are consistent with negative modulation of these actions by protein kinase C.

1-(5-Isoquinolinesulfonyl)-2-Methylpiperazine↗

Effects of paired analogs of angiotensin II and angiotensin III on rat smooth muscle.

The effects of several paired analogs of angiotensin II and angiotensin III, designed as antagonists, have been compared in isolated smooth muscle (rat uterus) and by in vivo rat blood pressure assay. These analogs were (1) the angiotensin II series: (1-sarcosine, 7-X, 8-isoleucine-) angiotensin II, and (2) the angiotensin III series: (1-despartyl, 7-X, 8-isoleucine)angiotensin II, where X=sarcosine, N-methyl-L-alanine or DL-nipecotic acid. All of these analogs had very low pressor and myotropic activities in the vagotomized, ganglion-blocked rat and the isolated rat uterus, respectively, although the angiotensin II analogs had significantly higher intrinsic pressor activity than the angiotensin III analogs. In addition, the angiotensin II analogs were potent antagonists of the contractile response to angiotensin II in the rat uterus whereas the angiotensin III analogs were weak inhibitors. These observations demonstrate the existence of functional differences for the proline residue in angiotensin II and angiotensin III analogs and may reflect differences in conformation and modes of binding to smooth muscle receptors between the two classes of peptides.

Angiotensin II↗

A comparison of the vasoconstrictor effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin III in the canine renal vasculature.

The effects of angiotensin II and angiotensin III on systemic blood pressure and renal blood flow were studied in pentobarbital anesthetized dogs pretreated with phenoxybenzamine. Angiotensin II was more potent than angiotensin III in increasing systemic blood pressure when given intravenously. When angiotensin II and angiotensin III were administered directly into the renal artery, angiotensin II was also more potent than angiotensin III as a renal vasoconstrictor. Indomethacin potentiated the responses to angiotensin II and angiotensin III to the same extent. The results indicate that differential vasoconstrictor effects of the two peptides in renal vasculature contribute to the difference in potency of intravenously administered peptides on systemic blood pressure, and also suggest that vasodilator prostaglandins are involved in the vasoconstrictor properties of the two peptides in the renal vasculature of the dog.

Angiotensin II↗