PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Auditory Perception”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

Evaluation of the effects of presentation rate and speaking rate on children's auditory perception of two levels of linguistic material.

Twenty-four first- and second-order sentential approximations of four words each were presented auditorily to two groups of eight normal children. Eight first- and eight second-order approximations were spoken at three rates: 90 (slow); 140 (normal); and 175 (fast) words/min. The 48 approximations were randomized and rates altered as necessary so that one group heard the material at a slow rate (90 words/min) of presentation and the other group at a normal rate (140 words/min) of presentation. The results indicated that although presentation rate did not significantly effect auditory perception, speaking rate did. It was concluded that a slow speaking rate can be expected to enhance the perception of low-level linguistic material regardless of the presentation rate, whereas a normal speaking rate would be best for higher level linguistic material.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed1991

Auditory perception is not special: we see the world, we feel the world, we hear the world.

The literature on "contrast" provides no evidence that durational contrast should occur in the speech and nonsence signals used in research cited by Diehl et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 89, 2905-2909 (1991)]. Moreover, there is evidence that, in comparable signals, it does not occur. Accordingly, their own account of the collection of findings on rate normalization is not viable. Their comments on my research do not imperil my interpretation of it or challenge my criticism that classification judgments of acoustically analogous speech and nonsense signals do not permit interpretation, by themselves, in terms of underlying auditory-system mechanisms. Their arguments that in auditory perception, uniquely, we hear proximal stimulation, not its physical causal sources, is implausible. Their theoretical perspective generally, I argue, is unrealistic.

Auditory Perception↗
PubMed1979

Protocol for determining the auditory percepts of electrical stimulation of the cochlea.

The percepts of electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve can best be determined in man. An eight channel bipolar electrode array has been developed which allows discreet stimulation of segments of auditory nerve via the scala tympani. In addition, a programmable stimulator has been developed which allows the delivery of different waveforms and stimulus patterns. Hopefully this will begin to allow the generation of the elements of speech.

Animals↗
PubMed1979

Absolute and relative cues for the auditory perception of egocentric distance.

Three experiments were performed to examine the reverberation cue to egocentric auditory distance and to determine the extent to which such a cue could provide 'absolute', as contrasted with 'relative', information about distance. In experiment 1 independent groups of blindfolded observers (200 altogether) were presented with broadband noise from a speaker at one of five different distances (0.55 to 8 m) in a normal hard-walled room. Half of each group of observers were presented with the sound at 0 deg azimuth, followed (after a delay) by the identical sound at 90 deg azimuth. The order of presentation was reversed for the remaining observers. Perceived distance varied significantly as a function of the physical distance to the speaker, even for the first presentations. The change in the binaural information between the 0 deg and 90 deg presentations did not significantly modify the results. For both orientations, near distances were overestimated and far distances were underestimated. Experiment 2 and 3 were designed to evaluate how much prior auditory exposure to the laboratory environment was necessary. A 200 Hz square-wave signal was presented from one of three distances (1, 2, or 6 m) to observers who had either minimal room information or an exposure which included talking within the room. Perceived distance varied significantly with physical distance regardless to exposure condition.

Acoustic Stimulation↗
PubMed1992

[Multivariate study of auditory perception using multi-electrode cochlear implants].

The goal of this study was to determine the influence of auditory and cognitive factors in hearing or listening mechanisms with the Nucleus multielectrode cochlear implant. Accordingly, hearing sensitivity, psycho-acoustical masking functions and measures of temporal resolution were obtained from 14 adults with acquired deafness. In addition, six measures of open-set speech discrimination were introduced to represent a possible contribution of cognitive factors. Results indicated the contribution of both auditory and cognitive factors to speech understanding. Cognitive factors were most influential. Differences were also found in the relative importance of various cognitive factors, both before and after an intensive aural rehabilitation program. Initially, subjects relied more heavily on their ability to make efficient use of the linguistic redundancy of speech. At the end of the program, they paid more attention to speech acoustics, as a result of enhanced auditory spectral analysis and temporal resolution at about 2 kHz.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1987

Auditory perception of music measured by brain electrical activity mapping.

The brain electrical activity of right-handed normal subjects was studied while they were exposed to auditory stimulation of the music type. The material presented was a note, a scale and a melody, recorded on magnetic tape. Each stimulus condition lasted 45 sec. The first 30 sec were analysed using brain electrical activity mapping in the delta (1-4 Hz), alpha (8-12 Hz) and beta 2 (18-24 Hz) frequency bands. The results showed significant bilateral reaction differences for all conditions, showing a left midtemporal activation predominance for the note and scale conditions, but a right midtemporal and frontal predominance for the melody. The results are discussed in terms of functional specialization for different levels of processing.

Adult↗
PubMed1992

Auditory perception changes after reimplantation in a child cochlear implant user.

The ability to remove cochlear implants from children and subsequently reimplant a more complex device in the same ear was the concern of this single case study. A postlinguistically deafened child, J.L., received a single-channel cochlear implant 1 yr after contracting meningitis and suffering a profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. After 3 yr of successful implant use, J.L. suffered an internal coil failure. She was then explanted and reimplanted with a multichannel cochlear implant in the same ear. This case report details her speech perception skills with her single-channel cochlear implant, a vibrotactile aid, and a multichannel cochlear implant. Results from auditory perceptual measures suggest that the explantation/reimplantation process was technically feasible with no adverse effects on J.L.'s ability to utilize a more sophisticated device and to exceed her previous performance levels.

Acoustic Stimulation↗