PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Biomarker stratification”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Using biomarkers to assess risk and consider treatment strategies in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes.

Since the first biomarker of myocardial necrosis was described in 1954, cardiac-specific biomarkers have been increasingly identified. This, coupled with dramatic evolution in assay technology and resultant highly sensitive assays, has rendered a remarkable transformation in the medical use of biomarkers. Initially used to aid in diagnosis of myocardial infarction, newer biomarkers of inflammation, plaque instability, and ischemia may complement biomarkers of necrosis by providing tools to diagnose impending myocardial necrosis before irreversible damage occurs, and offering additional information for risk stratification. Importantly, biomarkers of different processes may be combined to enhance risk stratification above that of any single marker.

Angina, Unstable↗

Individualizing therapy in acute coronary syndromes: using a multiple biomarker approach for diagnosis, risk stratification, and guidance of therapy.

Patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes (ACS) are typically grouped together and treated with similar approaches to therapy despite tremendous variability in clinical presentation and prognosis. The cardiac troponins are biomarkers of myocardial necrosis that have recently been evaluated in conjunction with markers of neurohormonal activation such as brain natriuretic peptide, and markers of systemic inflammation such as C-reactive protein, to further characterize risk in the individual patient presenting with ACS. Measurement of biomarkers that reflect different components of the underlying pathophysiology appears to provide independent and complementary risk stratification information in patients with non-ST-elevation ACS. This review summarizes the rationale for a multimarker approach to risk stratification in ACS and also discusses other cardiac biomarkers under active investigation. One of these of particular interest is soluble CD40 ligand, a biomarker that may not only indicate active inflammation and platelet activation associated with ACS, but may also exhibit direct prothrombotic properties that mediate early atherogenesis, plaque rupture, and thrombosis.

Angina, Unstable↗

Biomarkers of metastatic disease in pheochromocytoma and paraganglioma.

Pheochromocytomas and paragangliomas (PPGLs) are rare neuroendocrine tumors with variable metastatic potential. While metastatic disease occurs in approximately 10-20% of cases, its prediction remains a major clinical challenge, as no histological system has been universally validated to reliably identify aggressive tumors at diagnosis. This review aims to provide a comprehensive and updated overview of current and emerging biomarkers of metastatic risk in PPGL, encompassing histopathological scoring systems, genetic and molecular markers, biochemical phenotyping, liquid biopsy approaches, and imaging-based biomarkers. Among established markers, germline SDHB mutation status, loss of SDHB expression by immunohistochemistry, elevated plasma 3-methoxytyramine, and histopathological scoring systems, such as GAPP and COPPS, represent the most clinically validated tools for risk stratification. Emerging biomarkers - including somatic alterations in ATRX and TERT, genomic instability indices, tumor immune microenvironment characterization, circulating tumor DNA, and oncometabolite quantification - show promise in refining prognostic assessment but require prospective validation before routine clinical implementation. Accurate risk stratification in PPGL demands a multiparametric and dynamic approach, integrating clinical, genetic, biochemical, and molecular parameters. Future progress will depend on large prospective international cohorts, standardized biomarker platforms, and biomarker-driven clinical trial designs to translate emerging molecular knowledge into improved patient outcomes.

SDHB↗

Redox Regulation in Glioblastoma: Mechanisms, Biomarkers, and Therapeutic Implications.

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary tumor of the central nervous system, characterized by high invasiveness, rapid progression, and a poor prognosis despite the current treatment modalities. Molecular stratification, using biomarkers such as IDH1, TERT, and MGMT, is a crucial step in the 2021 WHO classification for improving diagnosis and prognosis. Oxidative stress, a feature of GB, has been identified as an important factor in the initiation, progression, and resistance to treatment. It occurs due to an imbalance between reactive oxygen species generated by mitochondrial metabolism, NADPH oxidases, and exogenous sources such as ionizing radiation and xenobiotics and antioxidant defense. This imbalance leads to DNA damage, genomic instability, and deregulation of signaling pathways involved in cell proliferation, apoptosis, and tumor progression. This review provides an overview of key oxidative stress biomarkers and their dual roles in tumor suppression and progression. It highlights how oxidative stress contributes to treatment responses and resistance to current GB treatments, including redox-adaptive mechanisms such as the Nrf2-Keap1 pathway, which promotes radioresistance. Finally, it discusses the potential of understanding these mechanisms to develop therapeutic strategies that target redox balance and homeostasis, aiming to overcome resistance and improve survival outcomes for glioblastoma patients.

Humans↗

N-terminal proBNP: a novel biomarker for the diagnosis, risk stratification and management of congestive heart failure.

Congestive heart failure is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality throughout the world and is now the leading cause of hospitalizations in adults over 65 years of age with an estimated annual expenditure in excess of USD 20 billion. In addition, it is the only cardiovascular disorder that continues to increase in both incidence and prevalence, and as the population continues to age, it is expected that the prevalence of this disease will continue to rise. Ironically, the armamentarium of medications that decrease mortality due to congestive heart failure also continues to grow; however, the relative number of eligible patients with congestive heart failure (or at risk for congestive heart failure) that receive these important therapies remains low. Thus, better tools to aid the early diagnosis and management of this disease are needed. Testing for natriuretic peptide markers, such as B-type natriuretic peptide or its amino-terminal fragment, has emerged as an important tool to assist in the optimal diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with congestive heart failure and may also play a valuable role in guiding therapy.

Biomarkers↗

Cardiac troponin I: a biomarker for detection and risk stratification of minor myocardial damage.

Myocardial infarction has long been a subject of research in cardiology and biochemistry. Within the past few years, a number of new phrases, micro-infarction, minor cardiac damage and non-ischemic cardiac damage have been frequently used and discussed since cardiac troponin I (cTnI) was introduced. Using this sensitive and specific biomarker it is now possible to detect minor cardiac damage occurring in different clinical settings: spontaneous, trauma, thermal injury, septic shock, or during cardiovascular surgery. The advent of this marker also opens a subject on the pathophysiologic aspect of non-ischemic cardiac damage that has not yet been fully understood and verified. This article reviews current knowledge of cTnI and its relationship with unstable angina and non-ischemic cardiac damage. The clinical implication of recent research findings on cTnI is also discussed.

Angina, Unstable↗

[Acute coronary syndrome and inflammation. Biomarkers for diagnostics and risk stratification].

Inflammation plays a pivotal role in atherosclerosis and coronary heart disease. Inflammatory processes of the coronary arterial wall are involved in plaque formation, progression and, finally, plaque instability consecutively leading to the clinical manifestations of stable coronary artery disease or acute coronary syndromes (unstable angina, non-ST elevation and ST elevation myocardial infarction). Acute coronary syndromes result from plaque rupture or erosion leading to local thrombus formation with consecutive necrosis of myocytes due to ischemia, which is associated with widespread and diffuse pancoronary and panmyocardial inflammation. Accordingly, markers of myocardial necrosis (e. g., cardiac troponins) do have crucial diagnostic and prognostic value. In case of troponin-negative acute coronary syndromes, however, markers of inflammation emerged as potentially useful tools for risk stratification. C-reactive protein has been shown to serve as a powerful predictor of future cardiovascular events following acute coronary syndromes, even if troponins are not (yet) positive. Moreover, a variety of pro- (soluble CD40 ligand, placental growth factor, interleukin-6, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, myeloperoxidase, monocyte chemoattractant protein-1) and anti-inflammatory markers (interleukin-10, activin A) have been suggested to provide relevant prognostic information in patients with acute coronary syndrome. However, the clinical utility of these novel markers has not been established so far.

Acute Disease↗

Association of high-sensitive C-reactive protein with advanced stage beta-cell dysfunction and insulin resistance in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with increased cardiovascular risk. One laboratory marker for cardiovascular risk assessment is high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). METHODS: This cross-sectional study attempted to analyze the association of hsCRP levels with insulin resistance, beta-cell dysfunction and macrovascular disease in 4270 non-insulin-treated patients with type 2 diabetes [2146 male, 2124 female; mean age +/-SD, 63.9+/-11.1 years; body mass index (BMI) 30.1+/-5.5 kg/m(2); disease duration 5.4+/-5.6 years; hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) 6.8+/-1.3%]. It consisted of a single morning visit with collection of a fasting blood sample. Observational parameters included several clinical scores and laboratory biomarkers. RESULTS: Stratification into cardiovascular risk groups according to hsCRP levels revealed that 934 patients had low risk (hsCRP <1 mg/L), 1369 patients had intermediate risk (hsCRP 1-3 mg/L), 1352 patients had high risk (hsCRP >3-10 mg/L), and 610 patients had unspecific hsCRP elevation (>10 mg/L). Increased hsCRP levels were associated with other indicators of diabetes-related cardiovascular risk (homeostatic model assessment, intact proinsulin, insulin, BMI, beta-cell dysfunction, all p<0.001), but showed no correlation with disease duration or glucose control. The majority of the patients were treated with diet (34.1%; hsCRP levels 2.85+/-2.39 mg/L) or metformin monotherapy (21.1%; 2.95+/-2.50 mg/L hsCRP). The highest hsCRP levels were observed in patients treated with sulfonylurea (17.0%; 3.00+/-2.43 mg/L). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that hsCRP may be used as a cardiovascular risk marker in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and should be evaluated in further prospective studies.

Adult↗

Association of HPV16 infection with p53 and&#xa0;survivin expression in oral squamous cell&#xa0;carcinoma.

Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is the most common malignancy of the oral cavity and a major public health concern worldwide. This study aimed to investigate the relationship between p53 and survivin expression, clinicopathologic parameters and HPV16 infection in OSCC in order to elucidate the potential role of HPV16 in its pathogenesis.The study enrolled 45 patients who underwent surgical treatment for histologically confirmed OSCC. Tumor specimens were formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and histologically analyzed using hematoxylin/eosin staining. Immunohistochemistry for p53 and survivin was performed using the DAKO system. DNA extracted from FFPE tumor tissues was analyzed for HPV16 genome presence using polymerase chain reaction (PCR). All patients were followed for three years after primary treatment.No statistically significant associations were observed between p53 or survivin expression and clinicopathologic parameters including age, gender, tumor site, grade, stage, recurrence, metastasis or HPV16 status (P > 0.05). Among HPV16-positive patients (11/45, 24.4%), low survivin expression (<5%) was found in 8/11 (73%) patients, while high p53 expression (>10%) was observed in 7/11 (64%) patients. Disease-free interval did not differ significantly between patients with low vs. high p53&#xa0;(P&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.220) or survivin expression (P = 0.580). A significant correlation was detected between p53&#xa0;and survivin expression (P = 0.04). HPV16 positivity was significantly associated with the absence of p53&#xa0;immunoreactivity.These findings suggest that HPV16-independent oncogenic pathways are likely predominant in OSCC, while HPV16 infection may be associated with a distinct molecular subset characterized by absent p53 expression (p53-; survivin+/-; HPV16+). These results underscore the biological heterogeneity of OSCC and may have implications for future biomarker-based stratification of patients.

HPV16↗

Decoding tumor immune microenvironment heterogeneity by single-cell and spatial multi-omics: From immunotherapy resistance to translational biomarkers.

Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed cancer therapy, yet primary and acquired resistance remain major clinical challenges. Increasing evidence indicates that immunotherapy resistance cannot be fully explained by tumor-intrinsic alterations or conventional biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, or microsatellite instability. Instead, therapeutic response is shaped by the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) as a heterogeneous, spatially organized, and dynamically evolving ecosystem. Single-cell omics has revealed diverse immune and stromal cell states, including progenitor and terminally exhausted T cells, suppressive myeloid programs, B-cell/TLS-associated immune-reactive states, and CAF-mediated exclusion phenotypes. Spatial transcriptomics, spatial proteomics, and imaging-based approaches further demonstrate that these cell states assemble into distinct immune niches, including immune-inflamed, T-cell-excluded, myeloid-suppressive, metabolic/hypoxic, and TLS-associated niches. These spatial ecosystems determine whether antitumor immune cells can access malignant cells, receive antigen-presenting support, or become restrained by stromal, vascular, metabolic, and myeloid barriers. In this review, we summarize how single-cell and spatial multi-omics redefine TIME heterogeneity in immunotherapy resistance, highlight ligand-receptor communication networks linking cell states to spatial immune dysfunction, and discuss emerging translational biomarkers for patient stratification. We further propose that future immunotherapy biomarkers should evolve from static single-marker assays toward longitudinal, spatially resolved, and interpretable multi-omics models that guide precision combination immunotherapy.

Humans↗

Genomic and integrative based progression biomarker discovery in adult sepsis: toward clinical stratification and precision medicine.

Sepsis is a life-threatening syndrome characterized by a heterogeneous host response to infection that remains a major cause of mortality worldwide. Current clinical scoring systems capture organ dysfunction but fail to reflect the underlying biological diversity, limiting their utility for patient stratification and targeted therapy. This review provides a comprehensive overview of molecular biomarker approaches used to predict sepsis course and prognosis in adult patients, covering genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic, and integrative strategies up to May 2026. Here, we summarize findings from genetic association studies, along with analyses based on polygenic risk scores to aggregate genetic effects, Mendelian randomization, and rare-variant sequencing approaches. We also review transcriptomic and proteomic strategies for endotyping, and diagnostic and prognostic discrimination. Lastly, we discuss how multi-omics integration is emerging as a promising framework to assist in distinguishing causal therapeutic targets from non-causal biomarkers. We also address the challenges that still constrain clinical translation towards precision medicine.

Biomarker↗

[Coronary biomarkers and long-term clinical outcome in acute coronary syndrome without ST segment elevation].

BACKGROUND: The use of new biomarkers improved risk stratification for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS). AIM: To evaluate the relationship between multiple biomarkers and long-term clinical outcome in ACS without ST segment elevation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with suspected ACS were studied. On admission to the emergency room, serum was obtained to determine highly sensitive C reactive protein (hsCRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), lipoprotein (a) (LPa) and soluble P selectin (sPS). Clinical endpoints were mortality and a composite endpoint of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, re-infarction, and angina. RESULTS: Seventy patients, aged 63+/-13 years, 54 males, were studied. Final diagnosis was unstable angina in 71% and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 29%. MACE and mortality rate were 17% and 5.8%, respectively. We found higher plasma levels of hsCRP, ESR and Lp(a) in patients with MACE (p=0.032, p=0.015 and p=0.010, respectively). Plasma levels of hsCRP and ESR were also higher in patients who died during the follow up (p=0.002 y p=0.045, respectively). CONCLUSION: Plasma levels of inflammatory markers and atherosclerosis biomarkers are associated with a worse long-term clinical outcome in ACS without ST segment elevation. The inclusion of these biomarkers in the routine blood test on admission, could improve risk stratification of patients with ACS in the future.

Acute Disease↗

Biomarkers of esophageal adenocarcinoma and Barrett's esophagus.

The rising incidence and poor prognosis of esophageal adenocarcinoma in the Western world have intensified research efforts into earlier methods of detection of this disease and its relationship to Barrett's esophagus. The progression of Barrett's esophagus to adenocarcinoma has been the focus of particular scrutiny, and a number of potential tissue and serum-based disease biomarkers have emerged. The epidemiology and pathogenesis of esophageal adenocarcinoma are outlined. Tissue biomarkers allowing risk stratification of Barrett's are reviewed as well as strategies currently being used to discover novel biomarkers that will facilitate the early detection of esophageal adenocarcinoma. Finally, the uses of biomarkers as predictive tests for targeted treatments and as surrogate endpoints in chemoprevention trials are considered.

Adenocarcinoma↗

Future biomarkers for detection of ischemia and risk stratification in acute coronary syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Evaluation of patients who present to the hospital with a complaint of chest pain or other signs or symptoms suggestive of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is time-consuming, expensive, and problematic. Recent investigations have indicated that increases in biomarkers upstream from biomarkers of necrosis (cardiac troponins I and T), such as inflammatory cytokines, cellular adhesion molecules, acute-phase reactants, plaque destabilization and rupture biomarkers, biomarkers of ischemia, and biomarkers of myocardial stretch may provide earlier assessment of overall patient risk and aid in identifying patients with higher risk of an adverse event. APPROACH AND CONTENT: The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of the pathophysiology and clinical and analytical characteristics of several biomarkers that may have potential clinical utility to identify ACS patients. These biomarkers (myeloperoxidase, metalloproteinase-9, soluble CD40 ligand, pregnancy-associated plasma protein A, choline, ischemia-modified albumin, unbound free fatty acids, glycogen phosphorylase isoenzyme BB, and placental growth factor) have demonstrated promise and need to be more thoroughly evaluated for commercial development for implementation into routine clinical and laboratory practice. SUMMARY: Specifications that have been addressed for cardiac troponins and natriuretic peptides will need to be addressed with the same scrutiny for the biomarkers discussed in this review. They include validating analytical imprecision and detection limits, calibrator characterization, assay specificity and standardization, pre-analytical issues, and appropriate reference interval studies. Crossing boundaries from research to clinical application will require replication in multiple settings and experimental evidence supporting a pathophysiologic role and, ideally, interventional trials demonstrating that monitoring single or multiple biomarkers improves outcomes.

Acute Disease↗

KLK6 is Associated with a Neutrophil-Dominant Immunosuppressive Microenvironment and Epigenetic Deregulation in Lung Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is the most prevalent histological subtype of lung cancer and is associated with poor survival despite advances in targeted therapies. Kallikrein-related peptidase 6 (KLK6) has been implicated in several malignancies, but its expression pattern, clinical relevance, and biological function in LUAD remain incompletely characterized. This study aimed to evaluate KLK6 expression and its associations with prognosis, epigenetic regulation, immune infiltration, and migratory phenotypes in LUAD. METHODS: RNA-seq expression and clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx), and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) databases. KLK6 expression was analyzed in relation to clinicopathological parameters, survival outcomes, promoter methylation status (via UALCAN), and tumor-infiltrating immune cell abundance (via TIMER2.0). In vitro, KLK6 was knocked down using shRNA in A549 and H1299 LUAD cell lines. Cell migration was assessed by transwell assays, and the expression of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition (EMT)- and Wnt signaling-related markers was examined by qRT-PCR and Western blotting. RESULTS: KLK6 expression was significantly upregulated in LUAD tissues compared with normal lung tissues. High KLK6 expression was associated with poorer overall survival (HR = 1.52, P = 0.009) and disease-specific survival (HR = 1.55, P = 0.03). ROC analysis showed that KLK6 discriminated stage I LUAD from normal tissues with an AUC of 0.73. Promoter hypomethylation was observed in LUAD tumors and correlated with increased KLK6 expression. Immune infiltration analysis revealed that KLK6-high tumors exhibited reduced B-cell infiltration and increased neutrophil infiltration. Functional experiments demonstrated that KLK6 knockdown significantly suppressed cell migration, accompanied by increased E-cadherin and decreased N-cadherin, Vimentin, Wnt5a, and &#x3b2;-catenin expression. DISCUSSION: These findings suggest that KLK6 overexpression in LUAD is driven in part by promoter hypomethylation and is closely linked to a neutrophil-dominant immunosuppressive microenvironment. Furthermore, KLK6 appears to promote LUAD cell migration through EMT- and Wnt-related signaling pathways. Collectively, these multi-layered data position KLK6 as a potential driver of aggressive tumor behavior and a candidate biomarker for risk stratification. CONCLUSION: KLK6 is aberrantly overexpressed in LUAD and is associated with poor prognosis and enhanced migratory capacity. It may serve as a promising prognostic biomarker and a potential therapeutic target for LUAD.

KLK6↗

Diagnostic and prognostic value of fibroblast growth factor 23 in acute kidney injury: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is associated with high mortality and adverse outcomes. Fibroblast growth factor 23 (FGF23) has emerged as a potential biomarker for AKI; however, its diagnostic and prognostic utility remains inconsistent.Methods: We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies evaluating circulating intact FGF23 (iFGF23) or C-terminal FGF23 (cFGF23) (PROSPERO: CRD42022302659). PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, and Wanfang databases were searched through June 9, 2026. QUADAS-2 was used for quality assessment. A random-effects bivariate model pooled sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative likelihood ratio (PLR/NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC AUC).Results: Twenty-three studies were included: 17 diagnostic, 6 prognostic (one addressing both). For AKI diagnosis, the pooled sensitivity was 0.79 (95% CI 0.73-0.86), specificity 0.82 (95% CI 0.75-0.89), PLR 4.40 (95% CI 2.59-6.21), NLR 0.25 (95% CI 0.16-0.34), DOR 17.49 (95% CI 8.67-35.16), and SROC AUC 0.87 (95% CI 0.81-0.92). Substantial heterogeneity was observed (I2 = 67%), with iFGF23 demonstrating higher accuracy than cFGF23 (AUC 0.91 vs 0.81). For AKI mortality, pooled sensitivity was 0.77 (95% CI 0.69-0.84), specificity 0.76 (95% CI 0.70-0.82), DOR 10.89 (95% CI 6.86-17.30), and SROC AUC 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.83). Significant heterogeneity was noted (I2 = 86.2% for sensitivity, 80.4% for specificity). No significant publication bias was detected.Conclusions: Circulating FGF23 exhibits moderate-to-high diagnostic and moderate prognostic performance in AKI, though interpretation is limited by substantial heterogeneity. It may serve as a complementary biomarker for risk stratification, pending further validation with standardized protocols.

Humans↗

Role of molecular biology in the follow-up of patients who have Barrett's esophagus.

At present, the follow-up of patients who have Barrett's esophagus (BE) should occur within the setting of an endoscopic biopsy surveillance program and with the frequency of surveillance as proposed by the American College of Gastroenterology. In the future, patients who have BE will be further stratified according to their risk for progression to invasive carcinoma. This stratification will permit the development of more rational surveillance programs. Models that incorporate epidemiologic risk factors, reflux symptoms, and endoscopic and histologic findings will likely include panels of biomarkers for further stratification of patients as low, intermediate, or high risk. Therefore, the challenge over the next decade will be to define the role of molecular markers in endoscopic surveillance strategies and to identify additional clinically relevant molecular markers for prognosis as intermediate markers for chemoprevention and as molecular targets for novel gene therapies.

Adenocarcinoma↗