PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Chest Tubes”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Outpatient chest tube management.

BACKGROUND: Patients with indwelling chest tubes inserted for the purpose of evacuating pleural air traditionally are treated in the hospital. The current emphasis on cost-effective medical care and a recent report describing the early discharge of patients who had undergone lung volume reduction operations and had a persistent air leak prompted us to review our overall experience with outpatient tubes in a general thoracic surgical practice. METHODS: We reviewed the records of patients who had been discharged from the hospital with chest tubes and Heimlich valves in place for venting pleural air over the past 7 years. Ambulatory tube management was used on a total of 240 occasions in three diagnostic groups: pneumothorax (176 cases), prolonged postresection air leak (45 cases), and outpatient thoracoscopic pulmonary wedge excision (19 cases). Failure was defined as hospital admission for complications of tube insertion or function. RESULTS: There were 10 failures in the entire group (4.2%), 4.5% for pneumothorax, 2% for postresection air leak, and 5.3% for outpatient thoracoscopy. There were no deaths or instances of life-threatening problems. The cost of at least 1,263 inpatient hospital days was saved. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of a chest tube, with or without an air leak, does not always require hospitalization. Admission can be avoided in most patients with primary spontaneous pneumothorax and in selected patients with pneumothorax of other causes. The postoperative hospital stay can be shortened for many patients who have a prolonged air leak after pulmonary resection. Ambulatory tube management also makes feasible outpatient thoracoscopy for noneffusive processes.

Adolescent↗

[Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery. Results of a prospective randomized study].

BACKGROUND: Chest tubes frequently cause postoperative patient discomfort after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Therefore, a prospective randomized study was conducted to analyze whether early chest tube removal within 2 h postoperatively is justified in VATS. METHODS: Ninety-three patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (VATS including wedge resection, complete lung extension on postoperative chest roentgenogram) and showed no exclusion criteria (lung volume reduction surgery, extensive pulmonary fibrosis, pneumothorax, pleural effusion, air fistula). Randomization resulted in early chest tube removal in 48 patients and in conventional chest tube management in 45 patients. RESULTS: Pain intensity was significantly reduced after early chest tube removal (P=0.03, t-test). In consequence, the mean analgesic requirement was significantly reduced (P=0.0001, t-test). The number of postoperative chest roentgenograms was significantly reduced after early chest tube removal (P=0.0001, t-test). The mean postoperative length of hospital stay was 5.4 vs 6.7 days (P=0.11, t-test). No postoperative complication occurred after early chest tube removal, while postoperative complications were observed in six patients with conventional chest tube management (P=0.01, Fisher's test). CONCLUSION: Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection is recommended. The inclusion and exclusion criteria of this study should be considered for future early chest tube removal. Long-term follow-up will clarify if early chest tube removal also leads to a reduction in chronic pain.

Adolescent↗

Cardiac tamponade in a preterm neonate secondary to a chest tube.

In a preterm infant, chest tubes were inserted for treatment of bilateral pneumothoraces. Hemorrhagic pericardial effusion with cardiac tamponade developed, probably resulting from traumatic injury by the left chest tube. The infant survived due to timely diagnostic and therapeutic intervention. No recurrence of pericardial effusion was seen and follow-up showed normal psychomotor development.

Cardiac Tamponade↗

The use of routine chest X-ray films after chest tube removal in postoperative cardiac patients.

BACKGROUND: The use of routine postoperative chest x-ray films (CXRs) for postoperative cardiac patients has been challenged, suggesting that only clinically indicated CXRs be obtained. The removal of chest tubes has been used as an indication for CXRs. Our hypothesis is that routine postoperative chest tube removal CXRs are not indicated in the asymptomatic postoperative cardiac patient. METHODS: Charts of 1,021 consecutive postoperative median sternotomy patients were reviewed, focusing on postoperative findings of CXRs, clinical evaluations, and interventions. Those who died prior to tube removal were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Tubes were removed on postoperative days 1 to 7 (average, 1.45 days). The two groups of patients were comparable in age, gender, procedure, and co-morbidity (p > .01). Seven hundred three patients underwent routine postoperative tube removal CXRs. Abnormal findings were present in 282 patients. Resultant therapeutic intervention was undertaken in 13 patients and 9 were symptomatic. No imaging after routine postoperative CXRs was conducted in 283 patients. These patients remained asymptomatic and required no intervention. Fourteen patients had clinically indicated CXRs after chest tube removal. Two of these patients had additional tubes placed, and 1 patient had follow-up films. In total, there was a 1.5% incidence of therapeutic intervention after chest tube removal. All patients were discharged without further sequelae of their tubes. CONCLUSIONS: Omission of routine postoperative chest tube removal CXRs in postoperative cardiac patients is safe. The removal of chest tubes in these patients is not an indication for CXRs.

Aged↗

Music: an intervention for pain during chest tube removal after open heart surgery.

BACKGROUND: Pain associated with chest tube removal is a major problem for patients who undergo open heart surgery. Because this pain is short-lived, timing the administration of pharmacological agents for pain relief is difficult and is therefore done inconsistently. OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of music as an intervention for pain relief during chest tube removal after open heart surgery. METHODS: In an experimental design, 156 subjects (mean age, 66 years; 69% men) were randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups: control, white noise, or music. All subjects preselected the type of music they preferred hearing. Ten minutes before the chest tube was removed, the patient's heart rate and blood pressure were measured, the patient rated pain intensity by using a numeric rating scale, and the prerecorded audiotape of music was begun. The patients rated their pain again immediately after chest tube removal and 15 minutes later. Physiological variables were assessed every 5 minutes until 15 minutes after the chest tubes were removed. RESULTS: Self-reported pain intensity, physiological responses, and narcotic intake after chest tube removal did not differ significantly among the 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: Although the findings were not statistically significant, most subjects enjoyed listening to the music, and therefore the use of music as an adjuvant to other therapies may be an appropriate nursing intervention.

Adult↗

Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.

BACKGROUND: Traditional management of chest tubes after a wedge resection of peripheral pulmonary tissue often lasts several days. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of early chest tube removal in the recovery room after uncomplicated video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical wedge resections of the lung. METHODS: From December 1995 to July 1997, 59 patients underwent video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical wedge resection for indeterminate pulmonary nodules (n = 33) or interstitial lung disease (n = 26). We prospectively evaluated early chest tube removal in the last 33 patients; 18 patients with nodules and 15 with interstitial lung disease. Patients who were in the early removal group had chest tubes removed within 90 minutes of the surgical procedure. Criteria for early removal were established and met before chest tube removal. There was no difference between groups with respect to age, sex, comorbidities, or pathologic evaluation of resection specimens. RESULTS: Ninety-four percent (31 of 33) of patients considered for early chest tube removal met criteria for immediate tube removal. Air leak and excessive drainage prohibited early removal in 2 patients. Patients who were managed traditionally averaged 3.3 days with chest tubes--1.8 days on suction, 1.3 days on water seal. Patients who had early removal of their chest tubes had a shorter postoperative stay (2.0+/-1.0 versus 3.9+/-2.1 days, p = 0.001) and fewer chest roentgenograms (2.8+/-2.1 versus 5.1+/-2.0, p = 0.001). There were no differences in complications including small pneumothoraces (5 in the early removal group, 7 in the traditional management group), which were managed with observation alone. Total narcotic requirements were greater in the traditional management group (54+/-44.8 versus 24.6+/-22.9 morphine milligram equivalents, p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: Early chest tube removal after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical wedge resection of peripheral pulmonary tissue appears to be a safe and cost-effective practice if strict criteria for removal are met.

Adult↗

Emergency chest tube placement in trauma care - which approach is preferable?

BACKGROUND: Pneumothorax is present in about 20% of blunt major trauma cases. Insertion of an intercostal tube drainage is one effective treatment, however it is unclear whether the thoracostomy has more advantages if placed in the ventral (2.-3. intercostal space) or lateral (4.-6. intercostal space) approach. The aim of this study was to determine, whether there are any differences between the two approaches in respect of malposition and complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The data from 851 consecutive patients, admitted to our trauma centre from January 2000 to June 2004, was collected and analysed prospectively. The inclusion criteria were: ISS > or = 16, insertion of an intercostal tube and subsequent thoracic computed tomography. Epidemiological and physiological data were analysed together with the location of the tube (ventral or lateral). The attending physician was free to choose the location of insertion. Chest tubes placed both on-scene and in-hospital chest tubes were investigated. Malpositions, defined as extrathoracic, abdominal, parenchymal or interlobal positions, were analysed by reviewing the computed tomography of the thorax (CT). Complications, like injuries to vessels or organs, infection or empyaema were analysed using our standardised prospective trauma protocol. Furthermore, the rate of clinically relevant malfunctions due to malposition was investigated as well as the number of chest tubes that had to be replaced. RESULTS: One hundred and one chest tubes were inserted in 68 patients with multiple trauma (mean age 40.7, ISS=38.1, AIS thorax=3.9). In 21 cases a ventral approach was chosen (20.8%) and in 80 a lateral approach (79.2%). CT revealed malposition in two of the ventrally placed tubes (9.5%) and in 20 of the laterally placed tubes (25%) (p=0.15, Fisher's exact test). One tube was identified in a subcutaneous location 17 chest tubes, after ventral approach all of them as a result of lateral approaches, were placed in the interlobe. No interlobal positions were observed in the ventral group. The interlobal position was found to be significantly higher in the lateral approach (p=0.013, Fisher's exact test). Clinically relevant malfunction was diagnosed in 6 of the 22 malpositioned chest tubes (5.9%). These tubes had to be repositioned, one was placed ventrally, the other five were placed laterally. CONCLUSIONS: In our setting physicians preferred the lateral approach on-scene as well as in-hospital. In every fifth patient malpositioning of the tube was observed, mostly interlobal after lateral chest tube, however only few were associated with relevant clinical malfunctions. The probability of interlobal malpositioning is significantly higher when using the lateral approach as opposed to the ventral approach. Correction of malpositioned and ineffective chest tubes was necessary in every 17th case. No statistically significant difference between the two approaches for functional malposition was observed. Hence both approaches for emergency chest tube insertion seem to be equally justified.

Chest Tubes↗

Initial chest tube management after pulmonary resection.

Tube thoracostomy management with suction or water seal after anatomical pulmonary resection remains somewhat controversial. Initial chest tube management may influence the duration of pleural fluid drainage, duration of tube thoracostomy, and/or hospital length of stay following pulmonary resection. We hypothesized that initial chest tube management with water seal decreases time for chest tube removal and decreases time of hospital stay. A retrospective chart review was performed on 109 consecutive patients who underwent lobectomy or segmentectomy in Western Pennsylvania Hospital between December 1999 and December 2003. Comparison was made between chest tube management of water seal or suction in patients with and without air leak. Of the 109 patients, 78 (72%) had no air leak at the completion of surgery, and 31 (28%) had air leak. In the group without air leak (n = 78), water seal was used in 32 (41%) patients and suction in 46 (59%). In patients placed to water seal initially after surgery (n = 32), removal of chest tubes was on postoperative day (POD) 3.19 +/- 0.24 and hospital discharge was on POD 5.13 +/- 0.61. In patients placed to suction initially (n = 46), chest tubes were removed on POD 4.52 +/- 0.40. Hospital discharge was on POD 6.74 +/- 0.5. Both duration of chest tube (P < 0.007) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.04) were significantly lower in the water seal group. In the air leak group (n = 31), 7 (23%) patients were managed with water seal and 24 (77%) patients with suction. Both duration of chest tube (P = 0.001) and length of hospital stay (P < 0.05) were significantly lower in the water seal group. In patients without air leak, chest tubes should be managed with water seal following anatomical pulmonary resection, resulting in significantly shorter chest tube duration and hospital length of stay.

Adult↗

The risk of percutaneous chest tube thoracostomy for blunt thoracic trauma.

Analysis of 164 percutaneous chest tube thoracostomies performed as a standardized technical procedure in the management of 129 blunt trauma victims demonstrated an overall complication rate of 9.1% (15 of 164). Three complications (1.8%) were related to problems of insertion, and four (2.4%) represented the problem of pneumothorax after chest tube removal. The remaining eight complications (4.9%) were associated with positive bacterial cultures, two (1.2%) of which represented clinical empyema. Both cases of empyema had either prolonged chest tube placement (23 and 15 days) or multiple chest tubes (two and three) on the same side. Percutaneous chest tube thoracostomy remains an important facet in the management of certain types of blunt thoracic trauma. Associated risks can best be minimized with adherence to a standardized technique and management protocol.

Adolescent↗

Effects of interpleural bupivacaine on pleural chest tube removal pain: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Moderate to severe pain associated with the removal of pleural chest tubes is poorly controlled with opioids. New methods are needed to manage the pain associated with this procedure. OBJECTIVES: To compare the effects of interpleural injections of 0.25% bupivacaine without epinephrine to those of normal saline on chest tube removal pain in cardiothoracic surgery patients. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was used, with a repeated measures design. Pain intensity and distress were measured before, immediately after, and 1 hour after chest tube removal. Pain sensations and affect were evaluated immediately after chest tube removal. The experimental group (n = 21) received bupivacaine and the control group (n = 20) received normal saline. RESULTS: In both groups pain intensity and distress scores were significantly higher at the time of chest tube removal than immediately before or 1 hour after. No significant differences in pain intensity, distress, sensation, or affect scores were found between the two treatment groups. The 13 patients who received intramuscular ketorolac an average of 3.5 hours before the procedure, independent of the study design, had significantly lower pain intensity scores at the time of chest tube removal than the 26 who did not. CONCLUSIONS: These data demonstrate that chest tube removal pain is of moderate to severe intensity and that pleural chest tube injections of bupivacaine were not effective in decreasing chest tube removal pain. However, the decrease in pain associated with the administration of ketorolac warrants future study.

Aged↗

The needle-wire-dilator technique for the insertion of chest tubes in pediatric patients.

We evaluated the needle-wire-dilator (NWD) technique, using commercially available sets, for insertion of chest tubes in 24 pediatric patients who were admitted to our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Fourteen patients had pneumothoraces, three had hemothoraces, two had pneumonia with empyema, four had pleural transudate effusions, and one had chylothorax. The ages of the patients ranged from four months to 24 years, and the sizes of the inserted chest tubes ranged from 10F to 20F. All insertions were successful, and the time from invasion of the pleural space by the needle to completion of chest tube insertion and connection to the tubing drainage system ranged from four to seven minutes. In four patients the procedure had to be performed while a significant coagulopathy existed. However, none of the 24 patients developed hemorrhagic complications. The only complication observed was a kink in the chest tube in five patients, resulting in recurrence of pneumothorax in four and pleural effusion in one. These adverse occurrences were corrected by repositioning the chest tubes in three patients, and by replacing the chest tubes with the stiffer, trochar type, chest tubes in the other two. We conclude that the NWD technique for chest tube insertion is quick, safe, and easy to perform in all pediatric age groups. The commercially available chest tubes used in our study were somewhat softer than the trochar type chest tubes available, which explains the occurrence of kinks in some of them.

Adolescent↗

The use of ice for pain associated with chest tube removal.

Every year more than 300,000 patients undergo cardiothoracic surgery, requiring placement of at least one chest tube. Removal of these chest tubes has been described as one of the worst intensive care unit experiences for these patients. Pain associated with chest tube removal (CTR) has been poorly controlled in many surgical patients. The purpose of this experimental study was to ascertain if the application of ice would decrease pain before, during, and after chest tube removal. Fifty postcardiac surgery patients were randomly assigned to two groups. The experimental group received ice therapy before CTR, whereas control subjects received a placebo. Pain intensity and pain distress were measured on a 0-10 numeric rating scale, and pain quality was measured using the McGill Pain Questionnaire-Short Form (MPQ-SF). Differences in pain intensity and pain distress between the experimental and control groups were not significant. A significant change in pain over time was noted in both groups, with pain intensity and distress being most severe during actual chest tube removal. Additionally, patients who received preprocedural pain medication did not differ in their levels of pain intensity or distress. Both groups used all the quality descriptors on the MPQ-SF for the sensory and affective components of pain, with cramping and gnawing as the most frequently chosen words. Continued research with larger samples is encouraged to further evaluate ice and other interventions that can be used to manage pain associated with CTR.

Adult↗

Avoiding chest tube placement after video-assisted thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung.

OBJECTIVE: A chest tube is usually placed in the pleural cavity after wedge resection of the lung, even after thoracoscopic procedures. The aim of this study was to determine the validity and safety of postoperative management without chest tube placement for patients undergoing thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. METHODS: Between 1998 and 2002, 93 patients underwent thoracoscopic wedge resection of the lung. In January 2000, we established the following criteria for avoiding chest tube placement: (1) absence of air leaks during intraoperative alternative sealing test, (2) absence of bullous or emphysematous changes on inspection, (3) absence of severe pleural adhesions, and (4) absence of prolonged pleural effusion requiring chest drainage preoperatively. Seventeen of 93 patients did not satisfy the criteria. The other 76 patients were divided into two groups: group 1 consisted of 34 patients who underwent thoracoscopic resection before 1999 and in whom a chest tube was routinely placed in spite of retrospectively meeting the criteria, group 2 consisted of 42 patients who underwent thoracoscopic resection after 2000 and in whom chest tube was not placed. The clinical data were evaluated and analyzed between the two groups. RESULTS: Two patients in group 1 required new intervention after removal of a chest tube that had been inserted during the operation due to recurrence of a pneumothorax, so did two patients in group 2 after the operation. The rate of late pneumothorax requiring intervention is similar in groups 1 and 2. No differences were found between the two groups with regard to postoperative chest pain and hospital stay. No patients experienced a significant adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Avoiding the chest tube placement did not increase postoperative morbidity if carefully selected criteria are met.

Adolescent↗

The effects of early chest tube placement on empyema resolution.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to determine the impact of the timing of chest tube insertion on outcome for the treatment of empyema, using a new animal model of empyema. DESIGN: A prospective, controlled randomized, blinded design was used. SETTING: The study was conducted in an animal research laboratory. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: Sixty-six 2- to 3-kg rabbits were used in this study. INTERVENTIONS: After induction of empyema, the rabbits were divided into four groups. Fourteen rabbits had chest tubes placed at 24 h after empyema induction. Seventeen rabbits had chest tubes placed at 48 h and 14 rabbits had chest tubes placed at 72 h after empyema induction. Twenty-one rabbits served as control rabbits and had no chest tubes placed. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Ten days after induction of empyema, the rabbits were killed. The pleural spaces of each rabbit were examined and a gross score, pleural peel score, and a microscopic score were calculated for each rabbit. The median gross score, mean pleural peel score, and median microscopic scores were significantly higher in the rabbits that underwent late chest tube placement (72 h) relative to those that underwent early chest tube placement (24 or 48 h). CONCLUSIONS: This study supports previous expert opinion statements and conclusions from retrospective analyses that early chest tube placement (relative to delayed chest tube placement) is beneficial for the treatment of empyema.

Animals↗

Outcome analysis of cirrhotic patients undergoing chest tube placement.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with cirrhosis can acquire pulmonary conditions that may or may not be related to their illness. Although posing a greater risk for complications, chest tubes are sometimes placed as treatment for hepatic hydrothorax and other pulmonary conditions. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of chest tube placement in cirrhotic patients. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed of 59 adults with cirrhosis undergoing chest tube placement. Variables that were investigated included reason for chest tube placement, complications developing while having the tube in place, and outcome. RESULTS: The 59 subjects were classified as having Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) class A cirrhosis (n = 3), CTP class B cirrhosis (n = 31), and CTP class C cirrhosis (n = 25). Indications for having a chest tube placed were hepatic hydrothorax (n = 24), pneumothorax (n = 9), empyema (n = 8), video-assisted thoracoscopy (VAT) [n = 7], non-VAT (n = 5), and hemothorax (n = 3). The CTP class A subjects had their chest tubes removed without further complications early in the course, and were excluded from further statistical analysis. Twenty-five subjects (42%) had significant pleural effusions requiring chest tube placement. Among the CTP class B and class C subjects, the median duration with chest tube in place was 5.0 days (range, 1 to 53 days). Serum total bilirubin levels, presence of portosystemic encephalopathy, and CTP C classification were predictors of mortality. Mortalities were seen in 5 of 31 CTP class B subjects (16%), and 10 of 25 CTP class C subjects (40%). The tubes were successfully removed in a total of 39 subjects (66%) with no further procedure. Forty-seven subjects (80%) acquired one or more of the following complications: renal dysfunction, electrolyte imbalances, and infection. CONCLUSIONS: When placed for all indications, chest tubes may be successfully removed in the majority of cirrhotic patients. However, a third of all patients still die with the chest tube still in place. Failure to remove the chest tube increases mortality in patients with increasing severity of liver disease.

Chest Tubes↗

A review of "chest tubes" during donor care and after transplantation.

Thoracostomy tubes, also called chest tubes, are commonly present after transplantation or during donor care. The function of the thoracostomy tube is to provide a conduit for transporting fluid, gas, or blood from the pleural cavity to an attached drainage unit. Malfunction of the tube or parts of the unit assembly may lead to serious consequences and jeopardize transplant recipient recovery or donor organs. This review discusses the components of the thoracostomy tube and drainage unit assembly, normal operation, routine evaluation, and common problems that the organ procurement or transplantation coordinator may need to anticipate or treat.

Chest Tubes↗

Chest tube insertion: a prospective evaluation of pain management.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate pain associated with chest tube insertion in a group of patients with malignant pleural effusions. DESIGN: Prospective case series. SETTING: Acute care cancer center in an academic institution. PATIENTS: Fifty-two patients with symptomatic malignant pleural effusions. Twenty-six evaluated by conventional approach to chest tube insertion (group 1), 26 evaluated after institution of a new chest tube protocol (group 2). INTERVENTIONS: A new protocol was designed to improve pain control during chest tube insertion. The protocol included improved housestaff and nursing education, premedication, proper insertion techniques, and more liberal and precise delivery of local anesthetic. OUTCOME MEASURES: Both groups were evaluated by a verbal self-report scale (1-10) to assess pain and anxiety. RESULTS: The mean pain rating in group 1 was 6.2 (+/-0.76) compared with 3.7 (+/-5.6) in group 2 (p < 0.01). In group 1, pain or anxiety was 9 or 10 in 12 of 26 on a scale of 1 to 10, compared with 2 of 26 in group 2 (p < 0.001). Anxiety rating was 4.5 (+/-0.72) in group 1 compared with 1.5 (+/-0.54) in group 2 (p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Chest tube insertion was associated with an unacceptably high level of pain and anxiety in our hospital. A new protocol, including housestaff education and changes in nursing policies, technical aspects, local anesthetic dose and delivery, and pre-medication, allowed us to approach the goal of a painless chest tube insertion.

Anxiety↗

A test to detect chest tube kinking.

OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the Mac-technique test can detect kinking of the chest tube upon thoracostomy tube placement. METHODS: This was a prospective observational study that was conducted October 2000 through October 2001 in an urban Level 1 trauma center. There were 103 consecutive nonrandomized adult trauma patients who required immediate tube thoracostomy during their initial resuscitation who were entered into the study. The Mac-technique test was performed during standard tube thoracostomy insertion to the appropriate depth. The test involved grasping the external portion of the thoracostomy tube, turning it clockwise 180 degrees, and then releasing the tube. If the tube spontaneously spun back to its original position, the test was considered positive, and the tube was considered kinked. If the tube did not spontaneously spin back and stayed in position upon release, the test was considered negative. Regardless of the results of this test, the tube was secured, and a postprocedure chest radiograph was obtained. The criterion standard for determining a kinked chest tube was its appearance on this chest radiograph. RESULTS: A total of 103 chest tubes were placed by using the Mac-technique test. The test was positive in eight placements; four tubes were kinked on chest radiograph. The Mac-technique test was negative in 95 placements; four tubes were kinked on chest radiograph. The Mac technique had a sensitivity of 50% (95% confidence interval [CI] = 15.7% to 84.3%), a specificity of 95.8% (95% CI = 89.6% to 98.8%), a positive likelihood ratio of 11.9, a negative likelihood ratio of 0.52, and an odds ratio using Yates correction of 20.3 (95% CI = 4.1 to 102.1). CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study, a positive Mac-technique test is useful to detect chest tubes that are likely to be kinked after insertion and before securing.

Adult↗