PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Clinical trial”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1979

Clobazam: uncontrolled and standard controlled clinical trials.

1 In an uncontrolled clinical trial, carried out in 11 psychiatric patients with the clinical diagnoses of anxiety neurosis and depressive neurosis, clobazam, a new benzodiazepine preparation, in the dosage range 10-60 mg daily produced statistically significant improvement in the total and both factor scores of the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A). The lowest mean total HAM-A scores occurred with a mean clobazam dosage of 48 mg daily. 2 Results of the uncontrolled clinical trial were further substantiated in a standard-controlled clinical study in which no statistically significant difference between the therapeutic effectiveness of clobazam and diazepam could be revealed. The lowest mean total HAM-A scores occurred with a mean clobazam dosage of 49 mg daily. There was a lower incidence of adverse effects reported in patients receiving clobazam than in those taking the control drug (diazepam).

Adjustment Disorders↗
PubMed1979

Gingival bleeding in an experimental clinical trial design.

An experimental clinical trial design is described in which the onset of gingival bleeding was used as an indicator of early gingivitis. Twenty-nine dental students participated in a double-blind crossover trial utilising chlorhexidine as a known plaque inhibitor. The onset of gingival bleeding was assessed in three ways, one of which yielded a statistically significant difference in favour of the active mouthrinse (P = 0.02). The method has a role in screening agents believed to be active against gingivitis.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Long-term treatment with sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Bactrim) and nitrofurantoin in chronic urinary tract infections. A controlled clinical trial.

In a controlled clinical trial based on 30 geriatric patients with recurrent urinary tract infection, 12 out of 17 patients fulfilled a 12-month treatment with sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim (Bactrim) with continuous sterile urine compared to 1 out of 13 patients treated with nitrofurantoin (p less than 0.05). There was a slight but statistically significant increase in serum creatinine during treatment for 12 months in the sulphamethoxazole/trimethoprim group, but this probably does not reflect any deterioration in kidney function. The remaining laboratory values showed no significant changes whatsoever.

Aged↗
PubMed1979

The psychological effects of differential treatment of a high risk sample in a randomized clinical trial.

A study was carried out using 616 participants in a randomized clinical trial at the Harvard MRFIT (Multiple Risk Factor Intervention Trial) Clinical Center, to test if there were differences in the psychological dimensions of anxiety, depression, and functional heart symptoms in groups given different levels of treatment in a CHD (Coronary Heart Disease) Intervention Program. A theoretical framework was given to justify a number of hypotheses as to the induction of adverse psychological effects. At the end of two years in the MRFIT Program there were no significant differences between the special intervention group (SI) and the usual care group (UC) in the selected psychological variables.

Anxiety↗
PubMed1977

The case for recording events in clinical trials.

The value of clinical trials in detecting unwanted effects of new medicines would be enhanced if doctors recorded all adverse events experienced by patients and not just those regarded as adverse reactions to drugs. All events should be reported to the centre co-ordinating the trial and analysed in treated patients and controls. This method might have revealed the ocular toxicity of practolol before the drug was marketed in 1970.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1978

[Penfluridol. Results of a year-long clinical trial].

During an open clinical trial, 51 schizophrenic patients were treated with Penfluirdol, 34 for 1 year and 17 for a shorter time. The mean dosage of Penfluirdol was 22 up to 28 mg per week. Assessments were made on days 0, 14, 28, 56, 90, 180, 270, and 365 using the AMP system and the EPRS scale of Simpson and Angus. The symptomatology was mainly reduced during the first 3 months of treatment and remained afterwards relative unchanged. Penfluridol showed a good antipsychotic effect on productive schizophrenic symptoms (thought disorders and paranoid symptoms, autism and schizophrenic affective disorders). The dosage used showed only a slight sedative effect and was well tolerated concerning autonomic and extrapyramidal side-effects.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Open trial and double-blind clinical trial of the antidepressant Ro 8-1998 in comparison with imipramine.

Based on the results of an open trial with Ro 8-1998 (chemic name: N,N-dimethyl-3-(1-methyl-5H-dibenzo(a,d)cycloheptene-5-ylidene)-propylamine N-oxide hydrochloride) in 11 endogenous depressed outpatients a double-blind trial with imipramine was proposed. Therapeutic efficacy and side effects of Ro 8-1998 and imipramine were compared in a double-blind trial with 30 patients who were newly hospitalized. Most of them suffered from endogenous depression. On days 0, 5, 10, 15 and 20 the patients were examined and the symptoms were documented with the AMP system, the Hamilton scale for depression, a behaviour rating and the "global depression rating Zurich". Ro 8-1998 caused a decrease of systolic blood pressure, an increase of heart frequency and urea. Twelve out of 15 patients showed a decrease of white blood cells. In four patients the number of white blood cells dropped below 4,000. Statistical analyses proved both substances to be potent antidepressants. The therapeutic efficacy of Ro 8-1998 was at least equal to that of imipramine. Further trials with bigger groups of patients are necessary to show whether the trend towards a better antidepressant efficacy of Ro 8-1998 can be reproduced.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

Treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage from ruptured intracranial aneurysm with tranexamic acid: a double-blind clinical trial.

A double-blind clinical trial of tranexamic acid was carried out on 39 patients with fresh subarachnoid hemorrhage from a ruptured aneurysm. Twenty patients received tranexamic acid, 6 gm daily for 14 to 21 days, while 19 patients received conventional therapy of bedrest and dexamethasone when cerebral edema developed, plus isotonic saline. Rebleeding and mortality were reduced by one-fourth and one-fifth, respectively (p less than 0.001). No side-effects were observed. Tranexamic acid is valuable in the treatment of subarachnoid hemorrhage caused by ruptured intracranial aneurysms.

Adult↗
PubMed1979

Zinc supplementation in alcoholic cirrhosis. A double-blind clinical trial.

A double-blind clinical trial with zinc sulfate, 0.2 g three times daily, and a placebo was performed in 30 patients with biopsy-proven alcoholic liver cirrhosis. The disease was in a stable phase, and none of the patients showed evidence of a decompensated liver function. Parameters of liver function, taste acuity, dark adaptation and of zinc and vitamin A metabolism were followed for six weeks. In the zinc-treated group of 16 patients, serum zinc rose from a normal mean value of 13.3 to 17.4 mumol/l, whereas the mean serum vitamin A level remained practically unaltered within the normal range, 1.89 at the entry and 1.83 mumol/l at the end of the study. Plasma prothrombin and serum alkaline phosphatase levels of the zinc group increased and serum bilirubin and serum carotene decreased significantly. The dark adaptation did not change, but the taste function was significantly improved during zinc treatment. The results indicate that zinc supplementation causes alleviation of certain abnormalities of cirrhotics, which deserves further attention.

Aged↗
PubMed1979

Clinical trials in cancer research.

This is a review paper which gives a discussion of various aspects of clinical trials in cancer research. Since the conduct of the first randomized controlled clinical trial in cancer patients in the mid-1950's, substantial progress has been made in the utilization of the clinical trial technique for the evaluation of therapeutic efficiacy. The important elements of a protocol are given with some discussion of items to be considered in designing a protocol. The types of clinical trial (phase I, II, III) are defined, and the place of each phase of study in the context of the search for new treatments is delineated. A comprehensive discussion is given of the elements in the comparative clinical trial (phase III), including objectives, consierations in planning (comparability of treatment groups stratification of patients, feasibility and size of study, and prospective versus retrospective studies). Brief descriptions are given of designs for comparative clinical trials and a trial in oat cell lung carcinoma is discussed in some detail. Finally, some comments and references are given concerning the analysis of clinical trials.

Carcinoma, Small Cell↗
PubMed1977

Combined therapy of oral cancer bleomycin and radiation: a clinical trial.

A concurrent randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate a combination of Bleomycin and radiation as against radiation only in the treatment of advanced oral cancer has been conducted at the Cancer Institute, Madras, since 1971. All T3 and T4 previously untreated oral squamous cell carcinomas with N0, N1 and N2 regional nodes, or N3 nodes confined to the submandibular region, without systemic metastases or gross infiltration of the temporal and infratemporal fossa producing total trismus, and in decent general health were eligible for the trial. Patients with gross active pulmonary tuberculosis were excluded, as were recurrent carcinomas. Age, external fungation of growth or radiological bone invasion were no bar. Randomisation was done by the sealed envelope technique. The study group received concurrent fractionated cobalt 60 teletherapy using two opposing fields and 10-15 mg of Intra-arterial or Intravenous Bleomycin. The controls received fractionated cobalt teletherapy and i.v. or i.m. distilled water on the same protocol as the Bleomycin cases. All cases were evaluated double blind 8 weeks after the end of radiation therapy, and were classified as 'favourable response' or 'failure'. The criterion of 'favourable response' was 'total clinical healing of the tumour within the volume of irradiation with no subsequent recurrence within that volume, whatever the length of follow up'. Anything else was reported as a failure. A long term follow up of 3 years is also available. 136 cases have completed the trial. The favourable response in the study group was 77% as against 20.9% in the control group. The differential response is statistically significant. The present study is the fourth in the series of combined therapeutic trials conducted in advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma since 1958. (Krishnamurthi and Shanta, 1963, 1965, 1967 and 1971). A concurrent randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate the combination of Bleomycin and radiation as against radiation only in treatment of advanced oral cancer has been conducted at the Cancer Institute, Madras since 1971.

Bleomycin↗
PubMed1979

Problems of university-based scientists associated with clinical trials.

University faculty members who participate in clinical trials face a number of difficulties in connection with this association. Publication opportunities are often limited, and individual scholarship is difficult to express and evaluate within the context of a cooperative trial. Merit increases, promotion, and the award of tenure will usually require evidence of scholarly achievement outside the trial setting. For this reason, it seems inadvisable to recommend that a young investigator devote a major portion of his scholarly and research time to such an activity. A possible exception may be a full-time appointment for 1 to 2 years. Nonetheless, cooperative clinical trials are an important investigative tool and they should continue to be associated with academic centers. If appropriate administrative arrangements can be made, it should be possible to solve the academic problems of the young investigator associated with such trials.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗
PubMed1979

Clinical trial design in cancer.

The design of clinical trials in cancer is a subject which features reasonably often among FRCR (Part 1) examination questions, and as such should be of more than passing interest to oncologists. It is also a subject which is gaining in relevance since the number of trials is increasing annually due in part to the many chemotherapeutic regimes which are being proposed. This paper which is based on a lecture given in Cambridge at the Hospital Physicists' Association Annual Conference in September 1978, is intended to act as an introduction to clinical trial design. References for further reading are given and, in particular, the extensive report on randomised clinical trials to the Medical Research Council's Leukaemia Steering Committee (Peto et al., 1977, 1978) is recommended.

Double-Blind Method↗
PubMed1976

Controlled clinical trial comparing the effect of betahistine hydrochloride and prochlorperazine maleate on patients with Meniére's disease.

Therapeutic effects of prochlorperazine and betahistine on patients with confirmed Meniere's disease (range of duration 1-11 years) were compared in a double-blind cross-over trial. The two active treatment periods lasted 4 montsh each, separated by a single blind "wash-out" period of 1 month's duration. Out of 30 patients 23 completed the trial. The clinical status of the patients was followed by the investigator by regular control visits during the trial period. Upon completion of the study preference for the first or the second period was assessed. The therapeutic effect of betahistine was found to be superior to that of prochlorperazine (sign test a = 0.05). The number of vertigo attacks was calculated in 17 patients and on this basis the two drugs were of equal value (Pratt's test 2 a = 0.05). No side effects were observed.

Adult↗
PubMed1975

A clinical trial with nomifensin, a new antidepressant drug.

An uncontrolled clinical trial with 10 depressed patients was conducted to identify the psychopathological symptoms which may be affected by nomifensin administration, and to reveal the possible adverse effects of the drug. Consistent statistically significant improvement was noted in the course of the clinical trial on all of the assessment instruments used, and - with the exception of one patient - all improved while receiving nomifensin. Most of the therapeutic changes were seen within the first three weeks of treatment, and they included improvements of depression, as well as of hostility, a symptom which usually remains unaffeCTED BY TRICYclic antidepressant drugs. To verify the favorable therapeutic effects of nomifensin in depressed psychiatric patients, a standard-controlled clinical trial is in progress; and to verify the action mechanism of nomifensin, a study employing the probenecid technique and the measurement of spinal homovanillic acid (HVA) and 5-hydroxyindole acetic acid (5hiaa) concentration is planned.

Adjustment Disorders↗
PubMed2026

A novel neoadjuvant immunotherapy confers improved overall survival in oral cancer patients with low tumor PD-L1 expression The IT-MATTERS Clinical trial - Prognostic role of tumor PD-L1 expression.

OBJECTIVE: Five-year overall survival (OS) remains&#xa0;<&#xa0;50% for patients with resectable, locally advanced (LA) primary oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and soft palate, receiving current standard of care (SOC). The aim of our study was to examine neoadjuvant Leukocyte Interleukin Injection (LI) with CIZ (intravenous low dose cyclophosphamide, indomethacin and zinc multivitamins) effect on OS, in low-risk (LR) OSCC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a randomized, controlled Phase 3 trial, treatment-na&#xef;ve locally advanced patients, with stage III/IVa OSCC and soft-palate cancer, had surgical tumor samples assessed for pre-defined thresholds of PD-L1 tumor proportion score (TPS). OS was analyzed using proportional hazard models for LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC vs SOC, in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. RESULTS: OS was superior in low risk (LR) patients receiving LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC compared to SOC; OS advantage hazard ratio (HR) 0.64, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0569 (without selecting for N0, PD-L1 TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10%), and the Kaplan-Meier (K-M) lifetable achieved significance (log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0340) favoring LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC vs SOC. Applying the selection criteria (cN0 and TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10%) to ITT, OS reached HR 0.34p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0012, Kaplan-Meier log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0015. The ITT LR cohort (cN0 and TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10%) achieved a HR 0.26 (p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0023), Kaplan-Meier log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0013, supported by progression free survival (PFS) HR 0.43, p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0178, Kaplan-Meier log rank p&#xa0;=&#xa0;0.0431, with 32% absolute survival advantage over control at 60&#xa0;months. CONCLUSIONS: Significant OS prolongation was observed in ITT population for LI&#xa0;+&#xa0;CIZ&#xa0;+&#xa0;SOC vs SOC, in LR and in ITT LR cN0, PD-L1TPS&#xa0;<&#xa0;10% cohort having locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma tumors in oral cavity/soft-palate. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01265849; EudraCT (Identifier: 2010-019952-35).

Humans↗
PubMed1976

Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. I. Introduction and design.

The Medical Research Council has for some years encouraged collaborative clinical trials in leukaemia and other cancers, reporting the results in the medical literature. One unreported result which deserves such publication is the development of the expertise to design and analyse such trials. This report was prepared by a group of British and American statisticians, but it is intended for people without any statistical expertise. Part I, which appears in this issue, discusses the design of such trials; Part II, which will appear separately in the January 1977 issue of the Journal, gives full instructions for the statistical analysis of such trials by means of life tables and the logrank test, including a worked example, and discusses the interpretation of trial results, including brief reports of 2 particular trials. Both parts of this report are relevant to all clinical trials which study time to death, and wound be equally relevant to clinical trials which study time to other particular classes of untoward event: first stroke, perhaps, or first relapse, metastasis, disease recurrence, thrombosis, transplant rejection, or death from a particular cause. Part I, in this issue, collects together ideas that have mostly already appeared in the medical literature, but Part II, next month, is the first simple account yet published for non-statistical physicians of how to analyse efficiently data from clinical trials of survival duration. Such trials include the majority of all clinical trials of cancer therapy; in cancer trials,however, it may be preferable to use these statistical methods to study time to local recurrence of tumour, or to study time to detectable metastatic spread, in addition to studying total survival. Solid tumours can be staged at diagnosis; if this, or any other available information in some other disease is an important determinant of outcome, it can be used to make the overall logrank test for the whole heterogeneous trial population more sensitive, and more intuitively satisfactory, for it will then only be necessary to compare like with like, and not, by chance, Stage I with Stage III.

Clinical Trials as Topic↗