PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA Repair”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

[Influence of acemetacin on DNA repair and DNA synthesis in vitro and in vivo (author's transl)].

The effects of [1-(p-chlorobenzoyl)-5-methoxy-2-methyl-indole-3-acetoxy]-acetic acid (acemetacin, TV 1322, Rantudil) on DNA repair (unscheduled DNA synthesis) and semiconservative DNA synthesis have been investigated in vitro in mouse spleen cells and in vivo in human leukocytes. Quantitative determination of DNA repair was made possible by a computer program and additional measurement of parameters of uptake kinetics. in vitro results showed no influence on DNA synthesis and therapeutically relevant concentrations had no influence on DNA repair. 6 female patients with diagnosticized rheumatoid arthritis received acemetacin 4 x 30 mg daily for three months. During the duration of treatment there was no significant change in DNA repair capacity or in semiconservative DNA synthesis in comparison to pre-treatment values.

Adult↗

The in vivo-in vitro hepatocyte assay for assessing DNA repair and DNA replication: studies in the CD-1 mouse.

The in vivo-in vitro hepatocyte assay, a short-term test that is useful for detecting potential rodent hepatocarcinogens, has been extended to the CD-1 mouse. Male CD-1 mice, 50-100 days old, were dosed orally with N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), trichloroethylene (TCE), 2-acetylaminofluorene (2-AAF), 4-acetylaminofluorene (4-AAF), phenobarbital (PB) or a vehicle. At 3, 16, 24 and 48 hr after dosing, hepatocytes were isolated by an in situ perfusion procedure, incubated in the presence of [3H]thymidine and fixed. Unscheduled as well as scheduled DNA synthesis was assessed by quantitative autoradiography. Unscheduled DNA synthesis represents DNA repair, while scheduled DNA synthesis (S phase) represents DNA replication. No mortality or morbidity was observed in the animals dosed in this study. The vehicles used, distilled water and corn oil, did not induce DNA repair or increase the percentage of hepatocytes in S phase at any of the time points examined. The higher dose of NDMA (10 mg/kg) induced DNA repair and increased S phase, whereas the lower dose (2 mg/kg) induced DNA repair but did not increase S phase. TCE (1000 mg/kg), PB (100 mg/kg) and 4-AAF (200 mg/kg) all markedly increased the percentage of hepatocytes in S phase (5-10 times the control) but all failed to induce DNA damage and repair. 2-AAF (200 mg/kg) caused a slight (twofold) increase in S phase but did not induce DNA repair. This assay appears useful for detecting potential CD-1 mouse hepatocarcinogens and, in addition, may provide information on the mode of action of known hepatocarcinogens.

2-Acetylaminofluorene↗

Drug resistance and DNA repair.

DNA repair confers resistance to anticancer drugs which kill cells by reacting with DNA. A review of our current information on the topic will be presented here. Our understanding of the molecular biology of repair of 0(6)-alkylguanine adducts in DNA has advanced as a result of the molecular cloning of the E. coli ada gene but the precise role of this lesion in the cytotoxic effects of alkylating agents in mammalian cells is not completely understood. Less progress has been made in understanding the enzymology and molecular biology of DNA cross-link repair even though such lesions are important for the cytotoxic effects of the widely used bifunctional alkylating agents and platinum compounds. It is evident that drug sensitive or resistant phenotypes are as highly complex as are the effects of DNA damage on cell metabolism and various aspects of these effects are discussed. Few clear correlations have been made between quantitative differences in DNA repair capacity and cellular sensitivity but assays which were developed to measure fidelity and intragenomic heterogeneity in DNA repair are beginning to be applied. Such studies may reveal subtle differences between sensitive and resistant cell lines. The molecular cloning of human DNA repair genes by transfection into drug sensitive rodent cells has been attempted. Some success has been achieved in this area but the functions of the cloned genes have yet to be identified.

Animals↗

Eukaryotic DNA polymerases in DNA replication and DNA repair.

DNA polymerases carry out a large variety of synthetic transactions during DNA replication, DNA recombination and DNA repair. Substrates for DNA polymerases vary from single nucleotide gaps to kilobase size gaps and from relatively simple gapped structures to complex replication forks in which two strands need to be replicated simultaneously. Consequently, one would expect the cell to have developed a well-defined set of DNA polymerases with each one uniquely adapted for a specific pathway. And to some degree this turns out to be the case. However, in addition we seem to find a large degree of cross-functionality of DNA polymerases in these different pathways. DNA polymerase alpha is almost exclusively required for the initiation of DNA replication and the priming of Okazaki fragments during elongation. In most organisms no specific repair role beyond that of checkpoint control has been assigned to this enzyme. DNA polymerase delta functions as a dimer and, therefore, may be responsible for both leading and lagging strand DNA replication. In addition, this enzyme is required for mismatch repair and, together with DNA polymerase zeta, for mutagenesis. The function of DNA polymerase epsilon in DNA replication may be restricted to that of Okazaki fragment maturation. In contrast, either polymerase delta or epsilon suffices for the repair of UV-induced damage. The role of DNA polymerase beta in base-excision repair is well established for mammalian systems, but in yeast, DNA polymerase delta appears to fulfill that function.

Animals↗

Managing DNA polymerases: coordinating DNA replication, DNA repair, and DNA recombination.

Two important and timely questions with respect to DNA replication, DNA recombination, and DNA repair are: (i) what controls which DNA polymerase gains access to a particular primer-terminus, and (ii) what determines whether a DNA polymerase hands off its DNA substrate to either a different DNA polymerase or to a different protein(s) for the completion of the specific biological process? These questions have taken on added importance in light of the fact that the number of known template-dependent DNA polymerases in both eukaryotes and in prokaryotes has grown tremendously in the past two years. Most notably, the current list now includes a completely new family of enzymes that are capable of replicating imperfect DNA templates. This UmuC-DinB-Rad30-Rev1 superfamily of DNA polymerases has members in all three kingdoms of life. Members of this family have recently received a great deal of attention due to the roles they play in translesion DNA synthesis (TLS), the potentially mutagenic replication over DNA lesions that act as potent blocks to continued replication catalyzed by replicative DNA polymerases. Here, we have attempted to summarize our current understanding of the regulation of action of DNA polymerases with respect to their roles in DNA replication, TLS, DNA repair, DNA recombination, and cell cycle progression. In particular, we discuss these issues in the context of the Gram-negative bacterium, Escherichia coli, that contains a DNA polymerase (Pol V) known to participate in most, if not all, of these processes.

Animals↗

Histone acetyl transferases: a role in DNA repair and DNA replication.

In eukaryotic cells DNA is associated with proteins to form a complex known as chromatin. The dominant proteins within this chromatin complex are the histones, which are subject to a wide variety of covalent and reversible posttranslational modifications such as acetylation. A specialized family of enzymes, the histone acetyl transferases, catalyzes the transfer of acetyl groups from their cosubstrate acetyl-coenzyme A to lysine residues of histones. Acetylation of histone N-terminal lysine residues induces chromosomal changes and results in the loss of chromosomal repression that allows the successful transcription of the underlying genes. Analogously, in DNA repair and also DNA replication the chromosomal repression is thought to be relieved by such mechanisms. Recently several publications have provided evidence that histone acetyl transferases also modify nonhistone proteins and thereby regulate their activities. This review discusses various aspects of histone acetyl transferases and summarizes recent findings which suggest a role for histone acetyl transferases in DNA repair and DNA replication.

Acetyltransferases↗

The Mfd protein of Bacillus subtilis 168 is involved in both transcription-coupled DNA repair and DNA recombination.

Inactivation of Bacillus subtilis orf1177 in an otherwise Rec+ strain reduced genetic exchange and DNA repair. When the mutation was transferred into a set of recombination-deficient and repair-deficient strains, the DNA repair and recombination ability of the double or triple mutant strains was drastically reduced. B. subtilis Orf1177 protein shares substantial homology with the Escherichia coli Mdf, RecG and UvrB proteins. In vivo analysis of UV-induced mutations suggests that Orf1177 is necessary for strand-specific DNA repair, as is the case for the E. coli MFD protein. Therefore, orf1177 and Orf1177 were termed mfd gene and Mfd protein, respectively. The purified Mfd protein has a native molecular mass of 140 kDa (expected molecular mass 133 kDa). The Mfd protein is a sequence-independent DNA binding protein with weak ATPase activity. The Mfd protein was able to displace in vitro B. subtilis or E. coli RNA polymerase stalled at a lesion. Therefore, Mfd protein appears to target the transcribed strand for repair by recognizing a stalled RNA polymerase and dissociating it from the DNA. In addition, the strong recombination-deficient phenotype of mfd- rec- strains suggest that Mfd protein is involved in homologous DNA recombination.

Amino Acid Sequence↗

Enzymatic mechanisms of DNA repair.

DNA repair proficiency in cells is expressed by various enzymes which can recognize damaged sites arising from exogenous agents or endogenous conditions. Either a damaged base is recognized by DNA glycosylases, partially removed by hemi-DNA glycosylases acting on diadduct damage, or direct incision of the phosphodiester bond near the damaged site. Incision at those apurinic or apyrimidinic sites arising from depurination-depyrimidination or glycosylase reactions is effected by apurinic or apyrimidinic endonucleases. Excision of damaged sites is catalyzed by unique exonucleases followed by DNA polymerase catalyzed reinsertion of nucleotides. The integrity of the strands is restored by polynucleotide ligase when a juxtaposed nucleotide is properly reinserted.

Animals↗

Gene silencing in phenomena related to DNA repair.

DNA methylation is essential for embryonic development and important for transcriptional repression, as observed in several biological phenomena. These include genomic imprinting, X-inactivation and carcinogenesis. The basic mechanism by which DNA methylation silences transcription is generally understood, but there is still much to be learned about how DNA methyltransferase is targeted to a specific region of the gene. Silencing by DNA methylation occurs at an early stage of carcinogenesis, when the DNA repair genes, MGMT and hMLH1, are frequently inactivated, resulting in mutations in key cancer-related genes in cells. Mice defective in Mgmt and/or Mlh1 gave clear evidence of the significant roles of these proteins in carcinogenesis. Recently, it has been demonstrated that DNA methylation is linked to histone methylation in fungi and plants, although it remains unknown whether this mechanism occurs in mammalian systems.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Dependence of cell survival on DNA repair in human mononuclear phagocytes.

Mononuclear phagocytes play a central role in the pathogenesis of chronic inflammatory diseases. It is therefore important to define chemotherapeutically exploitable metabolic pathways that distinguish monocytes from other cell types. Blood monocytes do not synthesize deoxynucleotides de novo, and their transformation to macrophages occurs without cell division. Whether or not monocytes can repair DNA damage, and whether or not DNA repair is necessary for their survival, is unknown. The present experiments demonstrate that normal human monocytes, unlike neutrophils, rapidly repair DNA strand breaks induced by gamma-irradiation. Monocyte extracts contain functional immunoreactive DNA polymerase-alpha. DNA repair synthesis in normal monocytes is blocked by aphidicolin, an inhibitor of DNA polymerase-alpha with respect to dCTP. Aphidicolin is also directly toxic to normal monocytes, but has no effect on nondividing lymphocytes or fibroblasts. Compared to most other cell types, monocytes and macrophages have very low dCTP pools, but abundant deoxycytidine kinase activity. This suggests that dCTP derived from salvage pathways is important for DNA repair in these cells. Consistent with this notion, exogenous deoxycytidine could partially protect monocytes from aphidicolin killing. The unexpected toxicity of aphidicolin toward normal human monocytes may be attributable to their high rate of spontaneous DNA strand break formation, to the importance of DNA polymerase-alpha for DNA repair in these cells, and to their minute dCTP pools.

2-Chloroadenosine↗

Cellular aspects of DNA repair.

DNA repair reactions are under cellular control. In bacteria, the reactions removing 0(6)-methylguanine and 3-methyladenine are inducible. It is not clear whether similar inducibility occurs in human lymphoblastoid cells. Nonetheless, the ability to manufacture the 0(6)-methylguanine acceptor protein does seem to be controlled by some chromosomal mechanism which is superimposed on the structural gene. This control system may affect reactions other than the removal of 0(6)-methylguanine. Insofar as this is so, transformed human lymphoblastoid cells have a system reminiscent of that found in bacteria.

Animals↗

Cyclosporin A inhibits Ca2+-mediated upregulation of the DNA repair enzyme DNA polymerase beta in human peripheral blood mononuclear cells.

Alterations in gene expression may represent an underlying cause of undesired side-effects mediated by the immunosuppressant cyclosporin A (CsA). We employed the method of differential display PCR to identify new genes whose expression is modulated by CsA. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs), or subpopulations thereof, were simultaneously stimulated with the phorbol ester 4beta-phorbol 12-myristate 13-acetate (PMA) and the calcium ionophore ionomycin, in the presence or absence of therapeutic concentrations of CsA. We identify the gene encoding the DNA repair enzyme DNA polymerase beta (Pol beta) as a novel CsA-sensitive transcription unit. Our data show that transcription of pol beta mRNA is induced by Ca2+ and that CsA significantly inhibits PMA/ionomycin- and ionomycin-mediated upregulation of both pol beta mRNA and Pol beta protein. The CsA-mediated inhibition of pol beta upregulation is maintained for at least 21 h after gene activation and is exerted via the phosphatase calcineurin. FK506, another immunosuppressant that targets calcineurin, also inhibits pol beta upregulation, while rapamycin competes with FK506 action. This work identifies Ca2+ as an inducer of pol beta gene activity in primary blood cells. The demonstrated CsA sensitivity of this process suggests a novel molecular mechanism that may contribute to the increased tumor incidence in patients receiving CsA treatment.

Animals↗

Fidelity of uracil-initiated base excision DNA repair in DNA polymerase beta-proficient and -deficient mouse embryonic fibroblast cell extracts.

Uracil-initiated base excision DNA repair was conducted using homozygous mouse embryonic fibroblast DNA polymerase beta (+/+) and (-/-) cells to determine the error frequency and mutational specificity associated with the completed repair process. Form I DNA substrates were constructed with site-specific uracil residues at U.A, U.G, and U.T targets contained within the lacZalpha gene of M13mp2 DNA. Efficient repair was observed in both DNA polymerase beta (+/+) and (-/-) cell-free extracts. Repair was largely dependent on uracil-DNA glycosylase activity because addition of the PBS-2 uracil-DNA glycosylase inhibitor (Ugi) protein reduced ( approximately 88%) the initial rate of repair in both types of cell-free extracts. In each case, the DNA repair patch size was primarily distributed between 1 and 8 nucleotides in length with 1 nucleotide repair patch constituting approximately 20% of the repair events. Addition of p21 peptide or protein to DNA polymerase beta (+/+) cell-free extracts increased the frequency of short-patch (1 nucleotide) repair by approximately 2-fold. The base substitution reversion frequency associated with uracil-DNA repair of M13mp2op14 (U.T) DNA was determined to be 5.7-7.2 x 10(-4) when using DNA polymerase beta (+/+) and (-/-) cell-free extracts. In these two cases, the error frequency was very similar, but the mutational spectrum was noticeably different. The presence or absence of Ugi did not dramatically influence either the error rate or mutational specificity. In contrast, the combination of Ugi and p21 protein promoted an increase in the mutation frequency associated with repair of M13mp2 (U.G) DNA. Examination of the mutational spectra generated by a forward mutation assay revealed that errors in DNA repair synthesis occurred predominantly at the position of the U.G target and frequently involved a 1-base deletion or incorporation of dTMP.

Animals↗

Effect of caffeine on cell killing, mutation induction, DNA repair, and DNA synthesis after treatment with ethylnitrosourea.

The effect of caffeine on cell killing, mutation induction, DNA repair, and inhibition of DNA synthesis was investigated in a clonal derivative of M3-1 Chinese hamster cells after treatment with N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU). Caffeine enhanced cell killing but had no effect on the mutation frequency/viable cells for the two genetic markers, 6-thioguanine resistance and ouabain resistance. The removal of ethylated purine bases from DNA was as follows: most of the 3-ethyladenine was lost in 20 h (greater than 85%) and approximately 45% of the 7-ethylguanine was lost in 45 h, whereas 75--93% of the O6-ethylguanine was still present at this time. Caffeine did not seem to influence these rates significantly. The ENU-induced inhibition of DNA synthesis was reversed by caffeine. It is concluded that the potentiation of ENU-induced cell killing by caffeine is caused by the increased frequency of DNA replication past damaged sites in parental DNA.

Animals↗

Aberrant DNA repair and DNA replication due to an inherited enzymatic defect in human DNA ligase I.

Two missense mutations in different alleles of the DNA ligase I gene have been described in a patient (46BR) with immunodeficiencies and cellular hypersensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. One of the mutant alleles produces an inactive protein, while the other encodes an enzyme with some residual activity. A subline of identical phenotype that is homozygous (or hemizygous) for the mutant allele encoding this partially active enzyme has facilitated characterization of the enzymatic defect in 46BR. This subline retains only 3 to 5% of normal DNA ligase I activity. The intermediates in the ligation reaction, DNA ligase I-AMP and nicked DNA-AMP, accumulate in vitro and in vivo. The defect of the 46BR enzyme lies primarily in conversion of nicked DNA-AMP into the final ligated DNA product. Assays of DNA repair in 46BR cell extracts and of DNA replication in permeabilized cells have clarified functional roles of DNA ligase I. The initial rate of ligation of Okazaki fragments during DNA replication is apparently normal in 46BR cells, but 25 to 30% of the fragments remain in low-molecular-weight form for prolonged times. DNA base excision repair by 46BR cell extracts shows a delay in ligation and an anomalously long repair patch size that is reduced upon addition of purified normal DNA ligase I.

Adenosine Monophosphate↗

Exonuclease X of Escherichia coli. A novel 3'-5' DNase and Dnaq superfamily member involved in DNA repair.

DNA exonucleases are critical for DNA replication, repair, and recombination. In the bacterium Escherichia coli there are 14 DNA exonucleases including exonucleases I-IX (including the two DNA polymerase I exonucleases), RecJ exonuclease, SbcCD exonuclease, RNase T, and the exonuclease domains of DNA polymerase II and III. Here we report the discovery and characterization of a new E. coli exonuclease, exonuclease X. Exonuclease X is a member of a superfamily of proteins that have homology to the 3'-5' exonuclease proofreading subunit (DnaQ) of E. coli DNA polymerase III. We have engineered and purified a (His)(6)-exonuclease X fusion protein and characterized its activity. Exonuclease X is a potent distributive exonuclease, capable of degrading both single-stranded and duplex DNA with 3'-5' polarity. Its high affinity for single-strand DNA and its rapid catalytic rate are similar to the processive exonucleases RecJ and exonuclease I. Deletion of the exoX gene exacerbated the UV sensitivity of a strain lacking RecJ, exonuclease I, and exonuclease VII. When overexpressed, exonuclease X is capable of substituting for exonuclease I in UV repair. As we have proposed for the other single-strand DNA exonucleases, exonuclease X may facilitate recombinational repair by pre-synaptic and/or post-synaptic DNA degradation.

Base Sequence↗

DNA repair replication, DNA breaks and sister-chromatid exchange in human cells treated with adriamycin in vitro.

The effects of adriamycin (AM) on DNA repair replication, the frequency of sister-chromatid exchange (SCE), the rate of cell proliferation and the frequency of DNA strand breaks were studied in human cells in vitro. No repair replication was observed in lymphocytes exposed to AM in concentrations up to 10(-3) moles/l. DNA repair replication induced by UV and alkylating agents was not affected by a concentration of AM that completely inhibited cell proliferation (10(-6) moles/l). Fibroblasts exposed to AM at 10(-4) moles/l in the presence of hydroxyurea showed an increase of strand breaks and cross-links in DNA. When AM was added to UV-irradiated fibroblasts, there was an increase of DNA strand breaks in addition to the breaks caused by UV alone. Similar effects were observed in lymphocytes. A dose-dependent increase of SCE was observed in lymphocytes exposed to low concentrations of AM (less than 10(-7) moles/l). At higher concentrations the increase of SCE levelled off, and cell proliferation became severely inhibited. There was no evidence of removal of SCE-inducing damage in cells exposed to AM during G0 or G1. The level of SCE induced in the third cell cycle after treatment with AM was not different from that induced during the first two cell cycles. These results suggest that the various genotoxic and cytotoxic effects of AM are caused by different types of cellular damage. Moreover, AM-induced DNA damage persists for several cell cycles in human cells in vitro and seems to be resistant to repair activity.

Cell Cycle↗

Arabidopsis RPA2: a genetic link among transcriptional gene silencing, DNA repair, and DNA replication.

Transcriptional gene silencing (TGS) controls the expression of transposable elements and of endogenous genes containing promoter repeats, and it is associated with increased DNA methylation. TGS-deficient mutants impaired in siRNA accumulation and/or chromatin modification (ago4, bru1, cmt3, dcl3, ddm1, drd1, drm2, fas1, fas2, hda6, hog1, met1, mom1, nrpd1a, nrpd1b, nrpd2a, rdr2, suvh2, and suvh4) have been identified, but not all mutations affect the same subset of targets. Here, we identify Arabidopsis RPA2, a conserved protein with DNA replication and DNA repair motifs, as a novel TGS component that is dispensable for endogenous small RNA accumulation. bru1, cmt3, ddm1, fas1, fas2, hda6, hog1, met1, mom1, and rpa2 mutants are impaired in TGS of dispersed Athila/TSI retrotransposons and of the transgene repeat locus L5, but unlike bru1, cmt3, ddm1, fas1, fas2, hda6, hog1, and met1, the rpa2 and mom1 mutants do not affect the accumulation of 5S-derived siRNAs. Like BRU1, FAS1, FAS2, and MOM1, RPA2 is dispensable for DNA methylation, and rpa2, bru1, fas1, and fas2, but not mom1, mutants are hypersensitive to the DNA damage agent MMS. These results suggest a coordination of the TGS machinery with DNA replication, repair, or recombination machinery at some loci, and they emphasize the diversification of the TGS pathway.

Arabidopsis↗