PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “DNA damage response”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

A role for DNA primase in coupling DNA replication to DNA damage response.

The temperature-sensitive yeast DNA primase mutant pri1-M4 fails to execute an early step of DNA replication and exhibits a dominant, allele-specific sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. pri1-M4 is defective in slowing down the rate of S phase progression and partially delaying the G1-S transition in response to DNA damage. Conversely, the G2 DNA damage response and the S-M checkpoint coupling completion of DNA replication to mitosis are unaffected. The signal transduction pathway leading to Rad53p phosphorylation induced by DNA damage is proficient in pri1-M4, and cell cycle delay caused by Rad53p overexpression is counteracted by the pri1-M4 mutation. Altogether, our results suggest that DNA primase plays an essential role in a subset of the Rad53p-dependent checkpoint pathways controlling cell cycle progression in response to DNA damage.

Blotting, Western↗

Angiopoietin-like protein 8 directs DNA damage responses towards apoptosis by stabilizing PARP1-DNA condensates.

Upon genotoxic stresses, cells employ various DNA damage responses (DDRs), including DNA damage repair or apoptosis, to safeguard genome integrity. However, the determinants among different DDRs choices are largely unknown. Here, we report angiopoietin-like protein 8 (ANGPTL8), a secreted regulator of lipid metabolism, localizes to the nucleus and acts as a dynamic switch that directs DDRs towards apoptosis rather than DNA repair after genotoxin exposure. ANGPTL8 deficiency alleviates DNA damage and apoptosis in cells exposed to genotoxins, as well as in the liver or kidney of mice injured by hepatic ischemia/reperfusion or cisplatin treatment. Mechanistically, ANGPTL8 physically interacts with Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1), in a PARylation-independent manner, and reduces the fluidity of PARP1-DNA condensates, thereby enhancing the pro-apoptotic accumulation of PARP1 and PAR chains on DNA lesions. However, the transcription of ANGPTL8 is gradually decreased following genotoxin treatment, partly due to downregulation of CCAAT enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA), presumably to avoid further cytotoxicity. Together, we provide new insights by which genotoxic stress induced DDRs are channeled to suicidal apoptosis to safeguard genome integrity.

Animals↗

Role of Doa1 in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae DNA damage response.

The cellular response to DNA damage requires not only direct repair of the damage but also changes in the DNA replication machinery, chromatin, and transcription that facilitate survival. Here, we describe Saccharomyces cerevisiae Doa1, which helps to control the damage response by channeling ubiquitin from the proteosomal degradation pathway into pathways that mediate altered DNA replication and chromatin modification. DOA1 interacts with genes involved in PCNA ubiquitination, including RAD6, RAD18, RAD5, UBC13, and MMS2, as well as genes involved in histone H2B ubiquitination or deubiquitination, including RAD6, BRE1, LGE1, CDC73, UBP8, UBP10, and HTB2. In the absence of DOA1, damage-induced ubiquitination of PCNA does not occur. In addition, the level of ubiquitinated H2B is decreased under normal conditions and completely absent in the presence of DNA damage. In the case of PCNA, the defect associated with the doa1Delta mutant is alleviated by overexpression of ubiquitin, but in the case of H2B, it is not. The data suggest that Doa1 is the major source of ubiquitin for the DNA damage response and that Doa1 also plays an additional essential and more specific role in the monoubiquitination of histone H2B.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Oncogene-induced senescence is a DNA damage response triggered by DNA hyper-replication.

Early tumorigenesis is associated with the engagement of the DNA-damage checkpoint response (DDR). Cell proliferation and transformation induced by oncogene activation are restrained by cellular senescence. It is unclear whether DDR activation and oncogene-induced senescence (OIS) are causally linked. Here we show that senescence, triggered by the expression of an activated oncogene (H-RasV12) in normal human cells, is a consequence of the activation of a robust DDR. Experimental inactivation of DDR abrogates OIS and promotes cell transformation. DDR and OIS are established after a hyper-replicative phase occurring immediately after oncogene expression. Senescent cells arrest with partly replicated DNA and with DNA replication origins having fired multiple times. In vivo DNA labelling and molecular DNA combing reveal that oncogene activation leads to augmented numbers of active replicons and to alterations in DNA replication fork progression. We also show that oncogene expression does not trigger a DDR in the absence of DNA replication. Last, we show that oncogene activation is associated with DDR activation in a mouse model in vivo. We propose that OIS results from the enforcement of a DDR triggered by oncogene-induced DNA hyper-replication.

Animals↗

Genomic approaches for identifying DNA damage response pathways in S. cerevisiae.

DNA damage response pathways have been studied extensively in the budding yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, yet new genes with roles in the DNA damage response are still being identified. In this chapter we describe the use of functional genomic approaches in the identification of DNA damage response genes and pathways. These techniques take advantage of the S. cerevisiae gene deletion mutant collection, either as an ordered array or as a pool, and can be automated for high throughput.

Base Sequence↗

Involvement of the Arabidopsis SWI2/SNF2 chromatin remodeling gene family in DNA damage response and recombination.

The genome of plants, like that of other eukaryotes, is organized into chromatin, a compact structure that reduces the accessibility of DNA to machineries such as transcription, replication, and DNA recombination and repair. Plant genes, which contain the characteristic ATPase/helicase motifs of the chromatin remodeling Swi2/Snf2 family of proteins, have been thoroughly studied, but their role in homologous recombination or DNA repair has received limited attention. We have searched for homologs of the yeast RAD54 gene, whose role in recombination and repair and in chromatin remodeling is well established. Forty Arabidopsis SWI2/SNF2 genes were identified and the function of a selected group of 14 was analyzed. Mutant analysis and/or RNAi-mediated silencing showed that 11 of the 14 genes tested played a role in response to DNA damage. Two of the 14 genes were involved in homologous recombination between inverted repeats. The putative ortholog of RAD54 and close homologs of ERCC6/RAD26 were involved in DNA damage response, suggesting functional conservation across kingdoms. In addition, genes known for their role in development, such as PICKLE/GYMNOS and PIE1, or in silencing, such as DDM1, turned out to also be involved in DNA damage response. A comparison of ddm1 and met1 mutants suggests that DNA damage response is affected essentially by chromatin structure and that cytosine methylation is less critical. These results emphasize the broad involvement of the SWI2/SNF2 family, and thus of chromatin remodeling, in genome maintenance and the link between epigenetic and genetic processes.

Arabidopsis↗

The Aspergillus nidulans uvsB gene encodes an ATM-related kinase required for multiple facets of the DNA damage response.

In Aspergillus nidulans, uvsB and uvsD belong to the same epistasis group of DNA repair mutants. Recent observations suggest that these genes are likely to control cell cycle checkpoint responses to DNA damage and incomplete replication. Consistent with this notion, we show here that UVSB is a member of the conserved family of ATM-related kinases. Phenotypic characterization of uvsB mutants shows that they possess defects in additional aspects of the DNA damage response besides checkpoint control, including inhibition of septum formation, regulation of gene expression, and induced mutagenesis. The musN227 mutation partially suppresses the poor growth and DNA damage sensitivity of uvsB mutants. Although musN227 partially suppresses several uvsB defects, it does not restore checkpoint function to uvsB mutants. Notably, the failure of uvsB mutants to restrain septum formation in the presence of DNA damage is suppressed by the musN227 mutation. We propose that UVSB functions as the central regulator of the A. nidulans DNA damage response, whereas MUSN promotes recovery by modulating a subset of the response.

Aspergillus nidulans↗

Multifactorial contributions to an acute DNA damage response by BRCA1/BARD1-containing complexes.

The BRCA1 gene product and its stoichiometric binding partner, BARD1, play a vital role in the cellular response to DNA damage. However, how they acquire specific biochemical functions after DNA damage is poorly understood. Following exposure to genotoxic stress, DNA damage-specific interactions were observed between BRCA1/BARD1 and the DNA damage-response proteins, TopBP1 and Mre11/Rad50/NBS1. Two distinct DNA damage-dependent super complexes emerged; their activation was dependent, in part, on the actions of specific checkpoint kinases, and each super complex contributed to a distinctive aspect of the DNA damage response. The results support a new, multifactorial model that describes how genotoxic stress enables BRCA1 to execute a diverse set of DNA damage-response functions.

Acid Anhydride Hydrolases↗

SQ/TQ cluster domains: concentrated ATM/ATR kinase phosphorylation site regions in DNA-damage-response proteins.

ATM/ATR-like protein kinases play central roles in the maintenance of genome stability and phosphorylate numerous substrates in response to DNA damage, preferentially on SQ or TQ motifs. ATM/ATR substrates often contain several closely spaced SQ/TQ motifs in regions that have been termed SQ/TQ cluster domains (SCDs). SCDs are now considered a structural hallmark of DNA-damage-response proteins. Mutational analyses of a number of SCD-containing proteins indicate that multisite phosphorylation of SQ/TQ motifs is required for normal DNA-damage responses, most commonly by mediating protein-protein interactions in the formation of DNA-damage-induced complexes. SCD sequences are highly diverse and these domains may be largely unfolded in their native state rather than adopting a common three-dimensional fold. Structural disorder of SCDs could be advantageous for efficient phosphorylation by ATM/ATR kinases and also enable them to be molded into distinct conformations to facilitate flexible interactions with multiple binding partners.

Amino Acid Motifs↗

Aspergillus nidulans as a model system to characterize the DNA damage response in eukaryotes.

Interest in DNA repair in Aspergillus nidulans had mainly grown out of studies of three different biological processes, namely mitotic recombination, inducible responses to detrimental environmental changes, and genetic control of the cell cycle. Ron Morris started the investigation of the genetic control of the cell cycle by screening hundreds of cell cycle temperature sensitive Aspergillus mutants. The sequencing and innovative analysis of these genes revealed not only several components of the cell cycle machinery that are directly involved in checkpoint response, but also components required for DNA replication and DNA damage response machinery. Here, we will provide an overview about currently known aspects of the DNA damage response in A. nidulans. Emphasis is put on analyzed mutants that are available and review epistatic relationships and other interactions among them. Furthermore, a comprehensive list of A. nidulans genes involved in different processes of the DNA damage response, as identified by homology of genome sequences with well-characterized human and yeast DNA repair genes, is shown.

Aspergillus nidulans↗

NFBD1, a novel nuclear protein with signature motifs of FHA and BRCT, and an internal 41-amino acid repeat sequence, is an early participant in DNA damage response.

Efficient repair of DNA double-strand breaks depends on the intact signaling cascade, comprising molecules involved in DNA damage signal pathways and checkpoints. Budding yeast Rad9 (scRad9) is required for activation of scRad53 (mammalian homolog Chk2) and transduction of the signal further downstream in this pathway. In the search for a mammalian homolog, three proteins in the human data base, including BRCA1, 53BP1, and nuclear factor with BRCT domains protein 1 (NFBD1), were found to share significant homology with the BRCT motifs of scRad9. Because BRCA1 and 53BP1 are involved in DNA damage responses, a similar role for NFBD1 was tested. We show that NFBD1 is a 250-kDa nuclear protein containing a forkhead-associated motif at its N terminus, two BRCT motifs at its C terminus, and 13 internal repetitions of a 41-amino acid sequence. Five minutes after gamma-irradiation, NFBD1 formed nuclear foci that colocalized with the phosphorylated form of H2AX and Chk2, two phosphorylation events known to be involved in early DNA damage response. NFBD1 foci are also detected in response to camptothecin, etoposide, and methylmethanesulfonate treatments. Deletion of the forkhead-associated motif or the internal repeats of NFBD1 has no effect on DNA damage-induced NFBD1 foci formation. Conversely, deletion of the BRCT motifs abrogates damage-induced NFBD1 foci. Ectopic expression of the BRCT motifs reduced damage-induced NFBD1 foci and compromised phosphorylated Chk2- and phosphorylated H2AX-containing foci. These results suggest that NFBD1, like BRCA1 and 53BP1, participates in the early response to DNA damage.

Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing↗

Adozelesin triggers DNA damage response pathways and arrests SV40 DNA replication through replication protein A inactivation.

The cyclopropylpyrroloindole anti-cancer drug, adozelesin, binds to and alkylates DNA. Treatment of human cells with low levels of adozelesin results in potent inhibition of both cellular and simian virus 40 (SV40) DNA replication. Extracts were prepared from adozelesin-treated cells and shown to be deficient in their ability to support SV40 DNA replication in vitro. This effect on in vitro DNA replication was dependent on both the concentration of adozelesin used and the time of treatment but was not due to the presence of adozelesin in the in vitro assay. Adozelesin treatment of cells was shown to result in the following: induction of p53 protein levels, hyperphosphorylation of replication protein A (RPA), and disruption of the p53-RPA complex (but not disruption of the RPA-cdc2 complex), indicating that adozelesin treatment triggers cellular DNA damage response pathways. Interestingly, in vitro DNA replication could be rescued in extracts from adozelesin-treated cells by the addition of exogenous RPA. Therefore, whereas adozelesin and other anti-cancer therapeutics trigger common DNA damage response markers, adozelesin causes DNA replication arrest through a unique mechanism. The S phase checkpoint response triggered by adozelesin acts by inactivating RPA in some function essential for SV40 DNA replication.

Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating↗

Reconstitution and molecular analysis of the hRad9-hHus1-hRad1 (9-1-1) DNA damage responsive checkpoint complex.

DNA damage activates cell cycle checkpoint signaling pathways that coordinate cell cycle arrest and DNA repair. Three of the proteins involved in checkpoint signaling, Rad1, Hus1, and Rad9, have been shown to interact by immunoprecipitation and yeast two-hybrid studies. However, it is not known how these proteins interact and assemble into a complex. In the present study we demonstrated that in human cells all the hRad9 and hHus1 and approximately one-half of the cellular pool of hRad1 interacted as a stable, biochemically discrete complex, with an apparent molecular mass of 160 kDa. This complex was reconstituted by co-expression of all three recombinant proteins in a heterologous system, and the reconstituted complex exhibited identical chromatographic behavior as the endogenous complex. Interaction studies using differentially tagged proteins demonstrated that the proteins did not self-multimerize. Rather, each protein had a binding site for the other two partners, with the N terminus of hRad9 interacting with hRad1, the N terminus of hRad1 interacting with hHus1, and the N terminus of hHus1 interacting with the C terminus of hRad9's predicted PCNA-like region. Collectively, these analyses suggest a model of how these three proteins assemble to form a functional checkpoint complex, which we dubbed the 9-1-1 complex.

Cell Cycle↗

p53 Binding protein 53BP1 is required for DNA damage responses and tumor suppression in mice.

53BP1 is a p53 binding protein of unknown function that binds to the central DNA-binding domain of p53. It relocates to the sites of DNA strand breaks in response to DNA damage and is a putative substrate of the ataxia telangiectasia-mutated (ATM) kinase. To study the biological role of 53BP1, we disrupted the 53BP1 gene in the mouse. We show that, similar to ATM(-/-) mice, 53BP1-deficient mice were growth retarded, immune deficient, radiation sensitive, and cancer prone. 53BP1(-/-) cells show a slight S-phase checkpoint defect and prolonged G(2)/M arrest after treatment with ionizing radiation. Moreover, 53BP1(-/-) cells feature a defective DNA damage response with impaired Chk2 activation. These data indicate that 53BP1 acts downstream of ATM and upstream of Chk2 in the DNA damage response pathway and is involved in tumor suppression.

Animals↗

Dual role of Nbs1 in the ataxia telangiectasia mutated-dependent DNA damage response.

The Nbs1 protein associates with Mre11 and Rad50 proteins to form the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex, which plays an important role in the intracellular signaling pathway activated in response to DNA damage. Mutations in the genes for each of these three components of the Mre11-Rad50-Nbs1 complex result in human diseases characterized by genomic instability. Insight into the functions of Nbs1 in the DNA damage response mediated by the protein kinase, ataxia telangiectasia mutated, has been provided by recent studies. Nbs1 acts both as a downstream target of ataxia telangiectasia mutated in the S-phase checkpoint of the cell cycle as well as an upstream modulator or activator of ataxia telangiectasia mutated in the DNA damage response.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗

The DNA repair genes RAD54 and UNG1 are cell cycle regulated in budding yeast but MCB promoter elements have no essential role in the DNA damage response.

The DNA repair genes RAD54 and UNG1 have MCB elements in their promoters and are shown to be cell cycle regulated. Their transcripts are coordinately expressed with RNR1, ribonucleotide reductase, a MCB-regulated gene known to be expressed in late G1. However, no evidence was obtained for a direct role of MCB elements in DNA repair. Of the proteins that bind and activate MCB elements, only mutations in SWI6 have a defect in DNA repair, showing significant sensitivity to methyl methane sulphonate. Furthermore, analysis of the CDC9 promoter indicates that MCB elements are not required for the induction of the gene by ultraviolet light irradiation. These promoter elements may not respond directly to DNA damage but may have a role in enhancing the induction response.

Cell Cycle↗

Cdk inhibition in human cells compromises chk1 function and activates a DNA damage response.

Cyclin-dependent kinases (Cdk) promote cell proliferation, are often deregulated in human cancers, and are targets of ongoing cancer chemotherapy trials. We show here that Cdk activity is also required in human cells to maintain function of the Chk1 pathway, a key component of the response to DNA damage or stalled replication. Chk1 expression was markedly reduced in primary fibroblasts and U2OS osteogenic sarcoma cells by treatment with small molecule Cdk inhibitors or induction of a dominant-negative mutant of Cdk2. The findings of decreased Chk1 activity and accumulation of Cdc25A, a protein targeted for degradation by Chk1, confirmed that Chk1 function was impaired. Furthermore, Cdk inhibition triggered a DNA damage response, characterized by the accumulation of activated forms of ATM and Chk2 as well as nuclear foci containing phosphorylated substrates of ATM/ATR, including histone H2AX (gammaH2AX). Time course experiments showed that the bulk of ATM activation followed Chk1 down-regulation. Chk1 RNA interference combined with partial inhibition of DNA replication was sufficient to evoke the DNA damage response. Conversely, ectopic expression of Chk1 blunted induction of gammaH2AX foci by Cdk inhibitors, indicating that Chk1 down-regulation was necessary to elicit the full phenotype. Finally, both Cdk and Chk1 inhibitors enhanced the cytotoxity of etoposide, a DNA-damaging agent. These results define a pathway through which Cdk inhibition can mediate DNA damage and potentially enhance the efficacy of extant cancer chemotherapies.

Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins↗

Pathogenesis of mantle-cell lymphoma: all oncogenic roads lead to dysregulation of cell cycle and DNA damage response pathways.

Mantle-cell lymphoma (MCL) is a well-defined subtype of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphomas (B-NHL), accounts for approximately 6% of all lymphoid neoplasms, and has a median survival of 3 to 4 years. The genetic hallmark of MCL is the chromosomal translocation t(11;14)(q13;q32) that leads to deregulation and upregulation of Cyclin D1, an important regulator of the G1 phase of the cell cycle. This genetic event is present in virtually all cases of MCL, whereas additional genetic alterations that occur in subsets of MCL have been described. Most of these alterations appear to disturb the cell cycle machinery/interfere with the cellular response to DNA damage, thus making MCL a paradigm for cell cycle and DNA damage response dysregulation in cancer in general. In particular, Cyclin D1 upregulation, genomic amplification of the cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) -4, deletions of the CDK inhibitor p16(INK4a) and overexpression of BMI-1, a transcriptional repressor of the p16(INK4a) locus, are associated with dysregulation of the cell cycle machinery in MCL. The DNA damage response pathway is affected by frequent alterations of the ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) kinase as well as occasional inactivation of checkpoint kinase (CHK)-1 and CHK2 that are kinases that act downstream of ATM in response to detection of DNA damage. Moreover, p53 is frequently targeted by alterations in MCL. A recent gene expression profiling study defined the proliferation signature, a quantitative measure of gene expression of proliferation-associated genes as the strongest survival predictor available to date allowing the definition of prognostic MCL subgroups that differ in median survival by more than 5 years.

Cell Cycle↗