[Epigenetics--cellular memories--affect disease development].
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Cell Differentiation↗
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Results for “Epigenetic memory”
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Handle with care: packaging the oocyte epigenome for the next generation.
During oocyte growth, substantial epigenetic programming occurs to establish a distinctive epigenome including appropriately patterned DNA methylation and histone modifications. Oocyte epigenetic programming must be tightly spatiotemporally regulated to ensure that a wide variety of epigenetic modifiers correctly establish their respective modifications to mediate precise control of gene expression. Furthermore, epigenetic modifications in oocytes include canonical and non-canonical genomic imprints, which are transmitted through meiosis to offspring. Significantly, disruptions in oocyte epigenetic programming can cause aberrant developmental outcomes in the next generation mediated by altered imprinting. Polycomb repressive complex 2 is an important epigenetic modifier that establishes histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation and non-canonical imprints during mouse oogenesis, which are important for normal offspring development. While it is widely recognised that altered oocyte epigenetic programming can disrupt offspring development, mechanisms controlling maternal epigenetic inheritance remain poorly understood. The possibility remains that non-canonical imprinting exists in humans, although this requires confirmation. This review discusses mouse and human oocyte epigenetic programming including interactions between various epigenetic modifiers and modifications that form the unique oocyte epigenome. Understanding how oocyte epigenetic programming is regulated will be crucial in discerning how changes to the oocyte epigenome can disrupt epigenetic memory and alter developmental outcomes in offspring.
Animals↗
Impact of the ECM on the Mechanical Memory of Cancer Cells.
Besides genomic and proteomic analyses of bulk and individual cancer cells, cancer research focuses on the mechanical analysis of cancers, such as cancer cells. Throughout the oncogenic evolution of cancer, mechanical inputs are stored as epigenetic memory, which ensures versatile coding of malignant characteristics and a quicker response to external environmental influences in comparison to solely mutation-based clonal evolutionary mechanisms. Cancer's mechanical memory is a proposed mechanism for how complex details such as metastatic phenotypes, treatment resistance, and the interaction of cancers with their environment could be stored at multiple levels. The mechanism appears to be similar to the formation of memories in the brain and immune system like epigenetic alterations in individual cells and scattered state changes in groups of cells. Carcinogenesis could therefore be the outcome of physiological multistage feedback mechanisms triggered by specific heritable oncogenic alterations, resulting in a tumor-specific disruption of the integration of the target site/tissue into the overall organism. This review highlights and discusses the impact of the ECM on cancer cells' mechanical memory during their metastatic spread. Additionally, it demonstrates how the emergence of a mechanical memory of cancer can give rise to new degrees of individuality within the host organism, and a connection to the cancer entity is established by discussing a connection to the metastasis cascade. The aim is to identify common mechanical memory mechanisms of different types of cancer. Finally, it is emphasized that efforts to identify the malignant potency of tumors should go way beyond sequencing approaches and include a functional diagnosis of cancer physiology and a dynamic mechanical assessment of cancer cells.
Humans↗
[Variations on the topic of the "histone code"].
Histones are the fundamental structural proteins intimately associated with eukaryotic DNA to form a highly ordered and condensed nucleoproteic complex termed chromatin. They are the targets of various posttranslational modifications including acetylation, methylation, phosphorylation and ubiquitination that modulate the structure/function of chromatin. The combinatorial nature of histone modifications is hypothesized to define a "histone code" that considerably extends the information potential of the genetic code, giving rise to epigenetic information. Moreover, most core histones consist of several nonallelic variants that can mark specific loci and could play an important role in establishment and maintenance of epigenetic memory. Here we will briefly present our current knowledge about histone posttranslational modifications and their implications in the regulation of epigenetic information. We will next describe core histone variants, insisting on their mode of incorporation into chromatin to discuss their epigenetic function and inheritance.
Histones↗
JmjC-domain-containing proteins and histone demethylation.
Histone methylation has important roles in regulating gene expression and forms part of the epigenetic memory system that regulates cell fate and identity. Enzymes that directly remove methyl marks from histones have recently been identified, revealing a new level of plasticity within this epigenetic modification system. Here we analyse the evolutionary relationship between Jumonji C (JmjC)-domain-containing proteins and discuss their cellular functions in relation to their potential enzymatic activities.
Amino Acid Motifs↗
Rapid and reversible epigenome editing by endogenous chromatin regulators.
Understanding the causal link between epigenetic marks and gene regulation remains a central question in chromatin biology. To edit the epigenome we developed the FIRE-Cas9 system for rapid and reversible recruitment of endogenous chromatin regulators to specific genomic loci. We enhanced the dCas9-MS2 anchor for genome targeting with Fkbp/Frb dimerizing fusion proteins to allow chemical-induced proximity of a desired chromatin regulator. We find that mSWI/SNF (BAF) complex recruitment is sufficient to oppose Polycomb within minutes, leading to activation of bivalent gene transcription in mouse embryonic stem cells. Furthermore, Hp1/Suv39h1 heterochromatin complex recruitment to active promoters deposits H3K9me3 domains, resulting in gene silencing that can be reversed upon washout of the chemical dimerizer. This inducible recruitment strategy provides precise kinetic information to model epigenetic memory and plasticity. It is broadly applicable to mechanistic studies of chromatin in mammalian cells and is particularly suited to the analysis of endogenous multi-subunit chromatin regulator complexes.Understanding the link between epigenetic marks and gene regulation requires the development of new tools to directly manipulate chromatin. Here the authors demonstrate a Cas9-based system to recruit chromatin remodelers to loci of interest, allowing rapid, reversible manipulation of epigenetic states.
CRISPR-Cas Systems↗
Histone H3 variants and their potential role in indexing mammalian genomes: the "H3 barcode hypothesis".
In the history of science, provocative but, at times, controversial ideas have been put forward to explain basic problems that confront and intrigue the scientific community. These hypotheses, although often not correct in every detail, lead to increased discussion that ultimately guides experimental tests of the principal concepts and produce valuable insights into long-standing questions. Here, we present a hypothesis, the "H3 barcode hypothesis." Hopefully, our ideas will evoke critical discussion and new experimental approaches that bear on general topics, such as nuclear architecture, epigenetic memory, and cell-fate choice. Our hypothesis rests on the central concept that mammalian histone H3 variants (H3.1, H3.2, and H3.3), although remarkably similar in amino acid sequence, exhibit distinct posttranslational "signatures" that create different chromosomal domains or territories, which, in turn, influence epigenetic states during cellular differentiation and development. Although we restrict our comments to H3 variants in mammals, we expect that the more general concepts presented here will apply to other histone variant families in organisms that employ them.
Amino Acid Sequence↗
Methylation of histones: playing memory with DNA.
Nucleosomal histones can be methylated in vivo at multiple residues and defined methylation patterns are related to distinct functional readouts of chromosomal DNA. Histone methylation has emerged as an important post-translational modification involved in transcriptional regulation and genome integrity. Recent progress in determining the cis and trans determinants of this process revealed multiple roles for histone methylation in epigenetic memory of active and silent states. The analysis of imprinted, X-linked and heterochromatic sequences disclosed mechanistic similarities for heritable transcriptional repression, pointing to a common mode of action. Moreover, the view of histone methylation as a stable modification has recently been challenged by studies revealing a number of pathways that are capable of removing histone methylation. Thus, in addition to having great in vivo complexity, this modification appears more dynamic then was previously thought.
Animals↗
[Decoding common mechanisms of cellular genetic-epigenetic control in eukaryotes].
The mechanism of genetic epigenetic operation at genomic and chromosomic levels within the limits of imitation model of eucaryotic cellular compartment is postulated, this compartment including left and right operators. Probable pattern of interactions during reproduction, determination and expression of genes as a manifestation of genetic, epigenetic memory and memory of water is shown. A specific character and rate of transformations of nucleotides and proteins are realized through different operation mechanisms over hierarchic processes directed on the preservation of DNA in the line of cellular generations and also determining dynamics of the genome with DNA variations. The mechanism of programmed provision of genetic-epigenetic interaction lies in the ways of control, regulation, adaptation and modulation of nucleotides and proteins transformations which occur on the basis of specific (complementary, kinetic and tunnel effects) choice of directions, place, time and aim of nucleotide-nucleotide, nucleotide-protein, protein-nucleotide and protein-protein interactions.
DNA↗
The epigenetic magic of histone lysine methylation.
Epigenetic mechanisms control eukaryotic development beyond DNA-stored information. There are several pathways, including histone tail modifications, histone variant incorporation, nucleosome remodelling, DNA methylation and noncoding RNAs that together all contribute to the dynamic 'make-up' of chromatin under distinct developmental options. The histone tail modifications are most variable and over 50 marks have by now been mapped. While the majority of these modifications are transient, histone lysine methylation and, in particular, a histone lysine tri-methyl state has been regarded as a more robust signal, consistent with proposed roles to impart long-term epigenetic memory. Based on the paradigm of SET-domain histone lysine methyltransferases (HMTases) and chromo-domain adaptor proteins, and in conjunction with the Sir Hans Krebs Medal 2005, I describe here my personal view on the discovery of the first HMTase in 2000, and the subsequent advances on the biology of histone lysine methylation. This discovery has changed my scientific career and significantly contributed to a better understanding of epigenetic control, with important implications for heterochromatin formation, X inactivation, Polycomb group silencing and novel insights into stem cell research, nuclear reprogramming and cancer.
Animals↗
Initiation of epigenetic reprogramming of the X chromosome in somatic nuclei transplanted to a mouse oocyte.
The active and inactive X chromosomes have distinct epigenetic marks in somatic nuclei, which undergo reprogramming after transplantation into oocytes. We show that, despite the disappearance of Xist RNA coating in 30 min, the epigenetic memory of the inactive X persists with the precocious appearance of histone H3 trimethylation of lysine 27 (H3-3meK27), without the expected colocalization with Eed/Ezh2. Subsequently, Xist re-appears on the original inactive X, and the silent Xist on the active X undergoes re-activation, resulting in unusual biallelic Xist RNA domains. Despite this abnormal Xist expression pattern, colocalization of H3-3meK27 and Eed is thereafter confined to a single Xist domain, which is presumably on the original inactive X. These epigenetic events differ markedly from the kinetics of preferential paternal X inactivation in normal embryos. All the epigenetic marks on the X are apparently erased in the epiblast, suggesting that the oocyte and epiblast may have distinct properties for stepwise programming of the genome.
Alleles↗
Promoter-restricted H3 Lys 4 di-methylation is an epigenetic mark for monoallelic expression.
Methylation of histone tails has been implicated in long-term epigenetic memory. Methylated H3 Lys 4 (K4) is a generally conserved mark for euchromatic, transcriptionally active regions, although the effect of this modification is likely also to depend on its distribution both within the euchromatic region and more specifically within a given gene. Here we describe a profile of H3K4 di-methylation that is specific for monoallelically expressed genes. Both X-linked genes subject to X-inactivation and autosomal imprinted genes have di-methylated H3K4 restricted to their promoter regions. In contrast, high levels of H3K4 di-methylation are found in both promoters and exonic parts of autosomal genes and of X-linked genes that escape X-inactivation. We suggest that this pattern of promoter restricted H3 Lys 4 di-methylation, already present in totipotent cells, is causally related to the long-term programming of allelic expression and provides an epigenetic mark for monoallelically expressed genes.
Alleles↗
Transgenerational continuity: Persistence as a dimension of inheritance and evolution.
Transgenerational continuity (TC) describes the persistence of inherited molecular architectures across generations. Progress in identity-by-descent (IBD) detection, recombination dynamics, and epigenetic research highlights the growing need for a more comprehensive model of inheritance. This theoretical framework synthesizes evidence from genomics, population studies, and epigenetics to outline how inherited molecular architectures, which are transmitted through IBD, together with heritable epigenetic modifications, can preserve ancestral information across generations. IBD captures genomic continuity across three nested scales, where recent familial segments link close relatives, population-level haplotypes are shared across cohorts, and archaic fragments from Neanderthal and Denisovan admixture persist as molecular fossils of ancient lineages. Although recombination and selection reshape these regions, their persistence across time scales highlights the evolutionary durability of genomic continuity. Epigenetic memory reflects regulatory persistence, whereby molecular modifications can preserve functional states across cell divisions and sometimes across generations. Together with familial and population-level IBD persistence and the long-term retention of introgressed haplotypes, these findings demonstrate that inherited molecular architectures can persist across multiple timescales. Evolutionary processes shape this persistence. Purifying selection preferentially removes deleterious inherited variants, whereas positive selection can favor the persistence of functionally relevant genomic architectures. From this perspective, evolutionary dynamics arise not only from the generation of variation, but also from the differential persistence of inherited molecular architectures through selection. Transgenerational continuity therefore provides a conceptual framework in which persistence serves as an explanatory dimension of inheritance and evolution that complements variation and explains the persistence of biological identity across generations and evolutionary time.
Biological identity↗
Polycomb complexes and silencing mechanisms.
Advances in the past couple of years have brought important new knowledge on the mechanisms by which Polycomb-group proteins regulate gene expression and on the consequences of their actions. The discovery of histone methylation imprints specific for Polycomb and Trithorax complexes has provided mechanistic insight on how this ancient epigenetic memory system acts to repress and indicates that it may share mechanistic aspects with other silencing and genome-protective processes, such as RNA interference.
Animals↗
MSI1-like proteins: an escort service for chromatin assembly and remodeling complexes.
MSI1-like WD40 repeat proteins are subunits of many protein complexes controlling chromatin dynamics. These proteins do not have any catalytic activity, but several recent studies using loss-of-function mutants established specific functions during development. Here, we review the current knowledge of MSI1-like proteins, including their phylogenetic history, expression patterns, biochemical interactions and mutant phenotypes. MSI1-like proteins, which are often targets or partners of tumor-suppressor proteins, are required during cell proliferation and differentiation in flies, nematodes and plants. We discuss the possibility that MSI1-like proteins could function to maintain epigenetic memory during development by targeting silencing complexes to chromatin during nucleosome assembly.
Animals↗
Gene bookmarking: keeping the pages open.
'Gene bookmarking' is a mechanism of epigenetic memory that functions to transmit through mitosis the pattern of active genes and/or genes that can be activated to daughter cells. It is thought that, at a point before mitosis, genes that exist in an open, transcriptionally competent state are bound by proteins or marked by some kind of modification event. This is thought to facilitate the assembly of transcription complexes on the promoters in early G1, thereby ensuring that daughter cells have the same pattern of gene expression as the cell from which they derived. Little is known, however, about these 'bookmarking factors' and modifications or the mechanisms by which they mediate the transmission of transcriptional competence after mitosis is complete. Recent findings have provided new insights into the mechanisms, regulation and biological importance of gene bookmarking in eukaryotic cell function.
Animals↗
Ordered recruitment of transcription and chromatin remodeling factors to a cell cycle- and developmentally regulated promoter.
Gene activation in eukaryotes requires chromatin remodeling complexes like Swi/Snf and histone acetylases like SAGA. How these factors are recruited to promoters is not yet understood. Using CHIP, we measured recruitment of Swi/Snf, SAGA, the repressor Ash1p, and transcription factors Swi5p and SBF to the HO endonuclease promoter as cells progress through the yeast cell cycle. Swi5p's entry into nuclei at the end of anaphase recruits Swi/Snf, which then recruits SAGA. These two factors then facilitate SBF's binding. Ash1p, which only accumulates in daughter cell nuclei, binds to HO soon after Swi5p and aborts recruitment of Swi/Snf, SAGA, and SBF. Swi5p remains at HO for only 5 min. Swi/Snf's and SAGA's subsequent persistence at HO is self sustaining and constitutes an "epigenetic memory" of HO's transient interaction with Swi5p.
Acetyltransferases↗
Chromatin remodeling in development and differentiation.
During development and differentiation, early inductive processes that influence cell fate at a later stage leave marks at distinct gene loci that are maintained through several rounds of mitosis. The structure of chromatin is part of this epigenetic memory that restricts or permits differential expression of genes in descendant cells. Establishing a cell-type-specific chromatin pattern thus predestines future cell differentiation and deters cell-lineage infidelity, as it often occurs during neoplastic transformation. As such, understanding the dynamics and mechanisms underlying chromatin remodeling has been a major focus of recent molecular genetic research that holds great promise for biomedical discoveries.
Animals↗