PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Euthanasia, Active, Voluntary”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2001

UK geriatricians' attitudes to active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted death.

AIM: To describe the views of British geriatricians on active voluntary euthanasia and physician-assisted death. METHOD: Postal questionnaire to 742 consultant members of the British Geriatrics Society. RESULTS: 81% considered active voluntary euthanasia never to be justified ethically, although 23% supported legalization in some situations and 13% would be willing to administer active voluntary euthanasia in some situations. With regard to physician-assisted death, 68% opposed it on ethical grounds and 24% supported its legalization in some instances, with 12% stating they would be willing to provide such assistance in some situations. Free text comments frequently cited good palliative care as an important response to such issues in clinical practice.

Adult↗
PubMed1997

Active voluntary euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide?

OBJECTIVE: To find out why Dutch general practitioners (GPs) and nursing home physicians (NHPs), and patients (according to their physician) opt for active voluntary euthanasia rather than for physician-assisted suicide, or vice-versa. DEFINITIONS: The following definitions were used in the study: Euthanasia is the intentional termination of life, by someone other than the patient, at the patient's request; physician-assisted suicide is intentionally helping a patient to terminate his or her life at his or her request. DESIGN: Two descriptive, retrospective studies. SETTING: The Netherlands. METHOD: Data were collected by means of anonymous questionnaires sent to a random sample of 521 GPs from the province of North Holland, 521 GPs from the rest of the Netherlands, and all 713 NHPs who were members of the Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians. Data were collected over the period 1986-1989 (inclusive) for GPs and the period 1986-June 1990 (inclusive) for NHPs. RESULTS: Forty-eight percent of the Gps, 78% of the NHPs, and about half of the patients who opted for euthanasia did so because of the physical condition of the patient. The reason GPs, NHPs, and patients gave most often for opting for physician-assisted suicide was that they wanted 'as far as possible to let the patient bear the responsibility.' CONCLUSION: In 38% of all cases for GPs and 57% of all cases for NHPs, only active voluntary euthanasia could be performed because of the patient's condition. In the other cases, where there was a choice, most GPs performed euthanasia, while most NHPs assisted in suicide. Active voluntary euthanasia was chosen primarily for medico-technical reasons, whereas physician-assisted suicide was selected primarily for moral reasons.

Adult↗
PubMed1999

Conditions required for a law on active voluntary euthanasia: a survey of nurses' opinions in the Australian Capital Territory.

OBJECTIVES: To ascertain which conditions nurses believe should be in a law allowing active voluntary euthanasia (AVE). DESIGN: Survey questionnaire posted to registered nurses (RNs). SETTING: Australian Capital Territory (ACT) at the end of 1996, when active voluntary euthanasia was legal in the Northern Territory. SURVEY SAMPLE: A random sample of 2,000 RNs, representing 54 per cent of the RN population in the ACT. MAIN MEASURES: Two methods were used to look at nurses' opinions. The first involved four vignettes which varied in terms of critical characteristics of each patient who was requesting help to die. The respondents were asked if the law should be changed to allow any of these requests. There was also a checklist of conditions, most of which have commonly been included in Australian proposed laws on AVE. The respondents chose those which they believed should apply in a law on AVE. RESULTS: The response rate was 61%. Support for a change in the law to allow AVE was 38% for a young man with AIDS, 39% for an elderly man with early stage Alzheimer's disease, 44% for a young woman who had become quadriplegic and 71% for a middle-aged woman with metastases from breast cancer. The conditions most strongly supported in any future AVE law were: "second doctor's opinion", "cooling off period", "unbearable protracted suffering", "patient fully informed about illness and treatment" and "terminally ill". There was only minority support for "not suffering from treatable depression", "administer the fatal dose themselves" and "over a certain age". CONCLUSION: Given the lack of support for some conditions included in proposed AVE laws, there needs to be further debate about the conditions required in any future AVE bills.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗
PubMed1998

Nurses' attitudes to active voluntary euthanasia: a survey in the ACT.

National public opinion polls show a large majority of Australians are in favour of active voluntary euthanasia (AVE). However, most members of the public have had only limited direct experience with dying people. For this reason, surveys of the opinions of medical practitioners and nurses on this issue are of great interest. The present study involved a postal survey in late 1996 of 2,000 randomly selected registered nurses from the Australian Capital Territory (ACT). The ACT has had extensive public debate about this issue. The questionnaire included some questions asked in earlier Australian surveys of the general public and health practitioners. Responses were received from 1218 nurses (61%). A majority of nurses who responded supported AVE as 'sometimes right', be it homicide by request (72%) or physician-assisted suicide (71%). A slightly smaller majority believed the law should be changed to allow homicide by request (69%) and physician-assisted suicide (67%). If AVE were legal, 66% of the nurses indicated they were willing to be involved in the procedure. Only 30% were willing to assist patients to give themselves the lethal dose, while 14% were willing to administer the lethal dose to the patient. Comparing these results with previous surveys, it appears that nurses are less in favour of AVE than the public, but more in favour than medical practitioners.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗