SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Falls”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1997

Falls, injuries due to falls, and the risk of admission to a nursing home.

BACKGROUND: Falls warrant investigation as a risk factor for nursing home admission because falls are common and are associated with functional disability and because they may be preventable. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of a probability sample of 1103 people over 71 years of age who were living in the community. Data on demographic and medical characteristics, use of health care, and cognitive, functional, psychological, and social functioning were obtained at base line and one year later during assessments in the participants' homes. The primary outcome studied was the number of days from the initial assessment to a first long-term admission to a skilled-nursing facility during three years of follow-up. Patients were assigned to four categories during follow-up: those who had no falls, those who had one fall without serious injury, those who had two or more falls without serious injury, and those who had at least one fall causing serious injury. RESULTS: A total of 133 participants (12.1 percent) had long-term admissions to nursing homes. In an unadjusted model, the risk of admission increased progressively, as compared with that for the patients with no falls, for those with a single noninjurious fall (relative risk, 4.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.2 to 7.5), those with multiple noninjurious falls (relative risk, 8.5; 95 percent confidence interval, 3.4 to 21.2), and those with at least one fall causing serious injury (relative risk, 19.9; 95 percent confidence interval, 12.2 to 32.6). Adjustment for other risk factors lowered these ratios to 3.1 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.9 to 4.9) for one noninjurious fall, 5.5 (95 percent confidence interval, 2.1 to 14.2) for two or more noninjurious falls, and 10.2 (95 percent confidence interval, 5.8 to 17.9) for at least one fall causing serious injury, but the association between falls and admission to a nursing home remained strong and significant. The population attributable risk of long-term admission to a nursing home for these three groups (the proportion of admissions directly attributable to the three categories of falls) was 13 percent, 3 percent, and 10 percent, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Among older people living in the community falls are a strong predictor of placement in a skilled-nursing facility; interventions that prevent falls and their sequelae may therefore delay or reduce the frequency of nursing home admissions.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1998

The effect of falls and fall injuries on functioning in community-dwelling older persons.

BACKGROUND: Several preventive strategies have proven effective at reducing the occurrence and rate of falling. It remains to be determined, however, whether, and to what extent, falls and/or fall injuries are independent determinants of adverse functional outcomes in older persons. METHODS: A probability sample of 1,103 community-dwelling persons over age 71 years was followed for 3 years. The 957 cohort members (87%) who participated in at least one follow-up interview while residing in the community were included in this study. Outcome measures included one and three year change in basic and instrumental activities of daily living (BADLs-IADLs), social activities, and physical activities. Based on daily calendars and hospital surveillance, participants were placed into one of four levels of fall status: no falls, one fall without serious injury, at least two falls without serious injury, and one or more falls with serious injury. Hierarchical linear regression models, sequentially adding six domains of covariates, were constructed to examine fall status as a risk factor for change in function. RESULTS: One noninjurious fall (beta = -.437; p < .01), at least two noninjurious falls (beta = -.877; p < .001); and at least one injurious fall (beta = -1.254; p < .001) were each associated with decline in BADL-IADL function over 3 years after adjusting for covariates (model R2 = .2617). Experiencing two or more noninjurious falls (beta = -.538; p < .05) was associated with decline in social activities (model R2 = .2779) while experiencing at least one injurious fall (beta = -.580; p < .01) was associated with decline in physical activity (model R2 = .4231). CONCLUSIONS: Falls and fall injuries appear to be independent determinants of functional decline in community-dwelling older persons. Falling is a health condition meeting all criteria for prevention: high frequency, evidence of preventability, and high burden of morbidity.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2003

The development of fear of falling among community-living older women: predisposing factors and subsequent fall events.

BACKGROUND: Fear of falling is a common and potentially modifiable health problem among older persons. However, relatively little is known about who develops fear of falling or why. METHODS: From a representative cohort of community-living persons aged 72 years or older, we evaluated 313 women who had no fear of falling. These participants underwent a comprehensive in-home assessment and were reassessed for fear of falling 1 year later. Fall events were ascertained monthly using a validated fall calendar. RESULTS: 84 (27%) participants developed fear of falling at 1 year and 77 (25%) participants experienced at least one fall event. The predisposing factors for developing fear of falling included age 80 years or older (adjusted relative risk 1.48; 95% confidence intervals 1.04-2.12), visual impairment (1.42; 1.01-2.00), a sedentary lifestyle (1.96; 1.35-2.84), and no available emotional support (2.64; 1.57-4.41). The occurrence of a subsequent fall event was also significantly associated with developing fear of falling (unadjusted relative risk 1.70; 1.18-2.45), although this effect was observed only among participants who had at least one predisposing factor. CONCLUSIONS: Among community-living older women, fear of falling develops due to a combination of predisposing factors and subsequent fall events. Since many of the predisposing factors are related to fall risk, preventive efforts to reduce fear of falling may also decrease the likelihood of falling.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2006

The association of balance capacity and falls self-efficacy with history of falling in community-dwelling people with chronic stroke.

OBJECTIVES: To describe the frequency of falls; to relate capacity-based and self-efficacy measures to fall history; and to determine to what extent capacity-based and self-efficacy measures are explained by subject characteristics and stroke impairments. DESIGN: Cross-sectional. SETTING: Community. PARTICIPANTS: Convenience sample of 50 people with chronic stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Fall history, Falls Efficacy Scale-Swedish Version, fear of falling, and the mood subscore of the Stroke Impact Scale. Balance, strength, and functional mobility were measured using the Berg Balance Scale, timed sit to stand, and Timed Up & Go, respectively. RESULTS: Falls were reported by 40% (n=20) of subjects; 22% (n=11) reported multiple falls. Subjects with fall history had more fear of falling (relative risk [RR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.1-4.9), had less falls-related self-efficacy (P=.04), and more depressive symptoms (P=.02) than nonfallers. Subjects with multiple fall history had poorer balance (P=.02), more fear of falling (RR=5.6; 95% CI, 1.3-23), and used a greater number of medications (P=.04) than non- and 1-time fallers. Strength partially explained balance, mobility, and falls-related self-efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: Balance and falls-related self-efficacy are associated with fall history and should be addressed in people with chronic stroke.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2001

The prevalence and risk factors of falling and fear of falling among lower extremity amputees.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate the falling experience and fear of falling status and to describe characteristics associated with falling and fear of falling. DESIGN: Population-based consecutive sample survey and chart review. SETTING: Two Canadian, regional, university-affiliated outpatient amputee clinics. PARTICIPANTS: The sample (n = 435; mean age, 62 +/- 15.7 yr) of community-living participants was mostly male (71%), had unilateral (below knee 73%; above knee 27%) amputations primarily for vascular (53% vs 47% nonvascular) reasons. INTERVENTION: Review patient charts and survey questionnaires to determine sociodemographic information (eg, social support), information about the amputation (eg, cause, level, problems), physical health and function (eg, pain, limitations, comorbidity), and psychologic state (depression, adaptation). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Occurrence of a fall in the past 12 months and presence of a fear of falling. RESULTS: Exactly 52.4% subjects reported falling in the past year, whereas 49.2% reported a fear of falling. Logistic regression analyses revealed falling was related to having an above knee amputation (odds ratio [OR] = 2.78; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.71-4.51), back (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.08-3.54) and joint (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 1.01-2.74) pain, and multiple stump and prosthesis problems (OR = 3.09; 95% CI = 1.58-6.04). Having had the amputation > or = 4 years in the past was protective (OR =.53; 95% CI =.29-.89). Factors related to an increase risk of fear of falling included having to concentrate on each step while walking (OR = 4.06; 95% CI = 2.46-6.71) and having a fall in the past 12 months (OR = 1.62; 95% CI = 1.04-2.54), whereas being male (OR = 0.35; 95% CI =.21-.57) and having good to excellent perceived health (OR =.35; 95% CI =.21-.58) were protective. CONCLUSIONS: Falling and fear of falling are pervasive among amputees. Comprehensive and ongoing intervention and education should be considered. Research is required to assess the consequences of falling and fear of falling.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2005

Patterns and predictors of inpatient falls and fall-related injuries in a large academic hospital.

OBJECTIVES: Most research on hospital falls has focused on predictors of falling, whereas less is known about predictors of serious fall-related injury. Our objectives were to characterize inpatients who fall and to determine predictors of serious fall-related injury. METHODS: We performed a retrospective observational study of 1,082 patients who fell (1,235 falls) during January 2001 to June 2002 at an urban academic hospital. Multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for serious fall-related injury (vs no or minor injury) included in the hospital's adverse event reporting database was conducted with logistic regression to calculate adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI95) RESULTS: The median age of patients who fell was 62 years (interquartile range, 49-77 years), 50% were women, and 20% were confused. The hospital fall rate was 3.1 falls per 1,000 patient-days, which varied by service from 0.86 (women and infants) to 6.36 (oncology). Some (6.1%) of the falls resulted in serious injury, ranging by service from 3.1% (women and infants) to 10.9% (psychiatry). The most common serious fall-related injuries were bleeding or laceration (53.6%), fracture or dislocation (15.9%), and hematoma or contusion (13%). Patients 75 years or older (aOR, 3.2; CI95, 1.3-8.1) and those on the geriatric psychiatry floor (aOR, 2.8; CI95, 1.3-6.0) were more likely to sustain serious fall-related injuries. CONCLUSIONS: There is considerable variation in fall rates and fall-related injury percentages by service. More detailed studies should be conducted by floor or service to identify predictors of serious fall-related injury so that targeted interventions can be developed to reduce them.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1998

Knowledge and perception of fall-related risk factors and fall-reduction techniques among community-dwelling elderly individuals.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Falls are a major cause of death and disability among older adults. Fall-related knowledge among community-dwelling elderly individuals, however, is unknown. The purposes of this study were to assess the perception of falling as a health problem, to determine the perceived importance of fall-related risk factors, and to identify personal characteristics and attitudes associated with perceived importance of fall-related risk factors among community-dwelling elderly people. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Resident council meeting attendees in 3 apartment buildings for elderly persons completed a self-administered survey (N=120). Items assessed factors influencing falls by the respondents (n=52) or falls among elderly persons (n=68). The data were analyzed by chi-square test, analysis of variance, and linear regression. RESULTS: Falling during the previous month was reported by 10.1% of the subjects. Eighty-six percent of the subjects considered falling to be a preventable health problem and viewed falling as a moderately important concern compared with other health concerns. Exterior environmental factors such as pavement conditions and handrails were perceived as most likely to cause falls. The perceived personal likelihood of falling due to these risk factors was markedly lower compared with the perceived risk for other elderly persons. CONCLUSION AND DISCUSSION: The community-dwelling elderly individuals studied considered falls to be preventable and understood the importance of fall-related risk factors, but they did not consider themselves to be susceptible to falling.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2006

Risk of falls after withdrawal of fall-risk-increasing drugs: a prospective cohort study.

AIMS: Falling in older persons is a frequent and serious clinical problem. Several drugs have been associated with increased fall risk. The objective of this study was to identify differences in the incidence of falls after withdrawal (discontinuation or dose reduction) of fall-risk-increasing drugs as a single intervention in older fallers. METHODS: In a prospective cohort study of geriatric outpatients, we included 139 patients presenting with one or more falls during the previous year. Fall-risk-increasing drugs were withdrawn, if possible. The incidence of falls was assessed within 2 months of follow-up after a set 1 month period of drug withdrawal. Multivariate adjustment for potential confounders was performed with a Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: In 67 patients, we were able to discontinue a fall-risk-increasing drug, and in eight patients to reduce its dose. The total number of fall incidents during follow-up was significantly lower in these 75 patients, than in those who continued treatment (mean number of falls: 0.3 vs. 3.6; P value 0.025). The hazard ratio of a fall during follow-up was 0.48 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.23, 0.99) for overall drug withdrawal, 0.35 (95% CI 0.15, 0.82) for cardiovascular drug withdrawal and 0.56 (95% CI 0.23, 1.38) for psychotropic drug withdrawal, after adjustment for age, gender, use of fall-risk-increasing drugs, baseline falls frequency, comorbidity, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and reason for referral. CONCLUSIONS: Withdrawal of fall-risk-increasing drugs appears to be effective as a single intervention for falls prevention in a geriatric outpatient setting. The effect was greatest for withdrawal of cardiovascular drugs.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2005

The relationship of intrinsic fall risk factors to a recent history of falling in older women with osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional descriptive analysis investigating intrinsic fall risk factors in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To examine the relationships between history of recent falls and balance, pain, quality of life, function, posture, strength, and mobility. BACKGROUND: Women with osteoporosis who fall are at a high risk of fracture due to decreased bone strength. Identifying fall risk factors for older women with osteoporosis is a crucial step in decreasing the incidence of falls and fracture. METHOD AND MEASURES: Seventy-three women over 60 years of age with established osteoporosis participated in comprehensive testing of fall history, physical function, and quality of life. RESULTS: Significant correlations were found between a recent history of falls and degree of kyphosis (r = 0.29), fear of falls/emotional status (r = -0.27), and balance (r = -0.27). Degree of kyphosis and fear of falls/emotional status explained 20% of the variance of recent fall history using binary logistic regression. Women with an increased kyphosis were more likely to have had a recent fall (odds ratio [OR], 1.17; 95% CI, 1.03-1.34) and those with better emotional status and less fear of falling were less likely to have had a recent fall (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97). CONCLUSION: Increased thoracic kyphosis and fear of falling are 2 intrinsic factors associated with recent falls in women with osteoporosis. To design more effective interventions to decrease fall risk in this population, future prospective, longitudinal studies should monitor kyphosis, fear of falling, balance reactions, and other potential risk factors not identified in this study.

Absorptiometry, Photon↗

PubMed2006

[Fall incident reports in theory and practice: recommendations for developing of practice-oriented fall incident reports in nursing homes].

Nursing home residents are known to be subject to a special risk for falls and fall-related injuries. The collection and analysis of root-causes and conditions of a fall in fall incident reports represent a vital instrument for secondary prevention and quality management. Preceding falls are proven to be one of the most important risk factors for repeated falls. Therefore it is recommended to report and evaluate the situation, in which the fall happened, in order to develop strategies for preventing repeated falls and for minimising the consequences of a fall. The question arises, how a fall incident report should look like, to meet both the scientific requirements and the expectations of the user in practice. To answer this question, six fall incident reports selected from theoretical and practical sources were described and analysed. After systematic analysis of the related German-language literature and conduction of some partly-structured interviews with different user groups the goals and requirements for fall incident reports were identified. Based on these targets and requirements as well as on the recommendations of national experts and scientific literature, criteria for evaluating fall incident reports were developed. None of the selected reports meets all the criteria. Finally, based on the theoretical and practical recommendations, components for fall incident reports were developed which meet both the criteria found. These components are guidelines for healthcare action based on the care process and, if followed properly, an important tool for fall prevention and for protecting nursing homes against liability claims.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2003

Predicting falls in residential care by a risk assessment tool, staff judgement, and history of falls.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is of great importance to consider whether a tool's predictive value is generalizable to similar samples in other locations. Numerous fall prediction systems have been developed, but very few are evaluated over a different time period in a different location. The purpose of this study was to validate the predictive accuracy of the Mobility Interaction Fall (MIF) chart, and to compare it to staff judgement of fall risk and history of falls. METHODS: The MIF chart, staff judgement, and fall history were used to classify the risk of falling in 208 residents (mean age 83.2 +/- 6.8 years) living in four residential care facilities in northern Sweden. The MIF chart includes an observation of the ability to walk and simultaneously interact with a person or an object, a vision test, and a concentration rating. Staff rated each resident's risk as high or low and reported the resident's history of falls during the past 6 months. Falls were followed up for 6 months. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 104 residents (50%) fell at least once indoors. Many of the factors commonly associated with falls did not differ significantly between residents who fell at least once and residents who did not fall. In this validating sample the predictive accuracy of the MIF chart was notably lower than in the developmental sample. A combination of any two of the MIF chart, staff judgement, and history of falls was more accurate than any approach alone; more than half of the residents classified as 'high risk' by two approaches sustained a fall within 3 months. CONCLUSIONS: Residents classified as 'high risk' by any two of the MIF chart, staff judgement, and history of falls should be regarded as particularly prone to falling and in urgent need of preventive measures.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2006

Educational intervention to reduce falls and fear of falling in patients after fragility fracture: results of a controlled pilot study.

OBJECTIVES: Falls and fear of falling are a major health problem. We sought to determine the effectiveness of an educational intervention in reducing fear of falling and preventing recurrent falls in community-dwelling patients after a fragility fracture. METHODS: One hundred two community-dwelling patients aged 50 years or older who fell and sustained a wrist fracture and were treated at Emergency Departments in Edmonton, Alberta, Canada (2001-2002) were allocated to either standardized educational leaflets and post-discharge telephone counseling regarding fall prevention strategies ("intervention") or attention-controls ("controls"). Main outcomes were fear of falling and recurrent falls 3 months after fracture. RESULTS: Mean age was 67 years and most patients were female (80%). The majority of falls (76%) leading to fracture occurred outdoors. Three months post-fracture, almost half of patients (48%) reported increased fear of falling and 11 of 102 (11%) reported falling again. The intervention did not reduce the fear of falling (43% had increased fear vs. 53% of controls, adjusted P value=0.55) or decrease recurrent falls (17% fell vs. 5% of controls, adjusted P value=0.059) within 3 months of fracture. CONCLUSIONS: An educational intervention undertaken in the Emergency Department was no more effective than usual care in reducing fear of falling or recurrent falls in community-dwelling patients. Future strategies must address a number of dimensions beyond simple education.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2001

Fall-risk screening test: a prospective study on predictors for falls in community-dwelling elderly.

This large prospective cohort study was undertaken to construct a fall-risk model for elderly. The emphasis of the study rests on easily measurable predictors for any falls and recurrent falls. The occurrence of falls among 1285 community-dwelling elderly aged 65 years and over was followed during 1 year by means of a "fall calendar." Physical, cognitive, emotional and social functioning preceding the registration of falls were studied as potential predictors of fall-risk. Previous falls, visual impairment, urinary incontinence and use of benzodiazepines were the strongest predictors identified in the risk profile model for any falls (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.65), whereas previous falls, visual impairment, urinary incontinence and functional limitations proved to be the strongest predictors in the model for recurrent falls (AUC = 0.71). The probability of recurrent falls for subsequent scores of the screening test ranged from 4.7% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 4.0-5.4%) to 46.8% (95% CI: 43.0-50.6%). Our study provides a fall-risk screening test based on four easily measurable predictors that can be used for fall-risk stratification in community-dwelling elderly.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2002

Fear of falling, falls efficacy, and health outcomes in older people following hip fracture.

PURPOSE: This study sought to determine whether fear of falling and falls efficacy independently contribute to the prediction of health outcomes after a fall, controlling for length of stay in hospital, prefall activity problems, and history of falls. METHOD: Eighty-two older people (> or = 65 years) admitted to hospital as a result of a fall, with proximal femoral fracture, were interviewed to assess variables of interest. At two months after initial interview, participants (n = 57) were re-interviewed in their own home, and their functional limitation and further fall events were assessed. Regression analyses were carried out to determine the ability of the variables assessed in hospital to predict functional limitation and further falls post discharge. RESULTS: Perceived risk of falling and falls efficacy did not explain variance in functional limitation when added to a model containing biomedical factors. In the prediction of further falls, addition of falls efficacy and worry over further falls to a model containing biomedical factors resulted in a statistically reliable improvement, although falls efficacy was not independently associated with outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Assessing worry over further falls in hospital may help to identify older people with hip fracture at risk of poor health outcomes.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed1999

Risk factors for falls and for serious injuries on falling among older Japanese women in Hawaii.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate if similar constellations of factors underlie the risks of falls and injuries on falling for Japanese women as reported for predominately white populations. DESIGN: A prospective cohort study SETTING: The island of Oahu PARTICIPANTS: The older Japanese women who participated in the Hawaii Osteoporosis Study (mean age = 74 +/- 5 (SD) years). MEASUREMENTS: As outcomes: falls and serious injuries on falling. As predictors: anthropometric measurements, measurements of neuromuscular performance, activities of daily living (ADLs), past falls, and other suspected risk factors for falls and serious injuries. RESULTS: In multivariable models, four subject characteristics were positively associated with having a fall (having a fall in the past year (RR = 2.0 (95% CI, 1.5-2.8)), slow chair stands (RR = 1.4 (95% CI, 1.0-1.9), a short height (RR = 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-2.1)), difficulties with five or more ADLs (RR = 1.5 (95% CI, 1.1-2.1))). Two subject characteristics were negatively associated with having a fall (ability to perform a full tandem balance with eyes closed (RR = .7 (95% CI, .5-1.0)) and having a long functional reach (RR = .7 (95% CI, .5-1.0))). The RRs represent as nearly as possible comparisons of the upper (or lower) quartile and the remaining quartiles. In multivariable models, long times for chair stands (odds ratio (OR) = 3.0 (95% CI, 1.5-6.1)) and a low BMI (OR = 3.1 (95% CI, 1.5-6.4)) were positively associated with having a serious injury among women who had a fall. Among the same women, taking part in an activity they did frequently (OR = .3 (95% CI, .1-.8)) and slow foot reaction times (OR = .3 (95% CI, .1-.8)) were associated negatively with having a serious injury. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this Japanese cohort support the conclusion that women at high risk of falling and serious fall injuries can be identified using a questionnaire and simple, performance-based tests of neuromuscular function. The risk factors for falling overlapped, but were distinct from, those for suffering a serious injury once a fall had occurred.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2000

Exercise in preventing falls and fall related injuries in older people: a review of randomised controlled trials.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of exercise programmes in preventing falls (and/or lowering the risk of falls and fall related injuries) in older people. DESIGN: A review of controlled clinical trials designed with the aim of lowering the risk of falling and/or fall injuries through an exercise only intervention or an intervention that included an exercise component. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Falls, fall related injuries, time between falls, costs, cost effectiveness. SUBJECTS: A total of 4933 men and women aged 60 years and older. RESULTS: Eleven trials meeting the criteria for inclusion were reviewed. Eight of these trials had separate exercise interventions, and three used interventions with an exercise programme component. Five trials showed a significant reduction in the rate of falls or the risk of falling in the intervention group. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise is effective in lowering falls risk in selected groups and should form part of falls prevention programmes. Lowering fall related injuries will reduce health care costs but there is little available information on the costs associated with programme replication or the cost effectiveness of exercise programmes aimed at preventing falls in older people.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2006

Community-dwelling seniors who present to the emergency department with a fall do not receive Guideline care and their fall risk profile worsens significantly: a 6-month prospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Fall risk is a major contributor to fracture risk; implementing fall reduction programmes remains a challenge for health professionals and policy-makers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We aimed to (1) ascertain whether the care received by 54 older adults after an emergency department (ED) fall presentation met internationally recommended 'Guideline Care', and (2) prospectively evaluate this cohort's 6-month change in fall risk profile. Participants were men and women aged 70 years or older who were discharged back into the community after presenting to an urban university tertiary-care hospital emergency department with a fall-related complaint. American Geriatric Society (AGS) guideline care was documented by post-presentation emergency department chart examination, daily patient diary of falls submitted monthly, patient interview and physician reconciliation where needed. Both at study entry and at a 6-month followup, we measured participants physiological characteristics by Lord's Physiological Profile Assessment (PPA), functional status, balance confidence, depression, physical activity and other factors. RESULTS: We found that only 2 of 54 (3.7%) of the fallers who presented to the ED received care consistent with AGS Guidelines. Baseline physiological fall risk scores classified the study population at a 1.7 SD higher risk than a 65-year-old comparison group, and during the 6-month followup period the mean fall-risk score increased significantly (i.e. greater risk of falls) (1.7+/-1.6 versus 2.2+/-1.6, p=0.000; 29.5% greater risk of falls). Also, functional ability [100 (15) versus 95 (25), p=0.002], balance confidence [82.5 (44.4) versus 71.3 (58.7), p=0.000] and depression [0 (2) versus 0 (3), p=0.000] all worsened over 6 months. Within 6 months of the index ED visit, five participants had suffered six fall-related fractures. DISCUSSION: We conclude that this group of community-dwelling fallers, who presented for ED care with a clinical profile suggesting a high risk of further falls and fracture, did not receive Guideline care and worsened in their fall risk profile by 29.5%. This gap in care, at least in one centre, suggests further investigation into alternative approaches to delivering Guideline standard health service.

Accidental Falls↗

PubMed2004

Influence of fall height and impact surface on biomechanics of feet-first free falls in children.

OBJECTIVE: The objectives of our study were to assess biomechanics associated with feet-first free falls in 3-year-old children and to investigate the influence of impact surface type and fall height on key biomechanical measures associated with injury risk. METHODS: Repeatable feet-first free fall experiments were conducted in a laboratory mock-up environment using an instrumented Hybrid II 3-year-old test dummy. Impact surface type and fall height were varied to examine their influence on biomechanical measures. RESULTS: Feet-first falls from short distances (27 in.) (0.69 m) were found to have a low risk of contact-type head injury, regardless of impact surface type. When comparing different types of impact surfaces in a 27 in. (0.69 m) fall, head acceleration associated with falls onto playground foam was significantly less than that associated with falls onto wood, linoleum or padded carpet. For falls onto playground foam, femoral compressive loads and bending moments were found to significantly increase as fall height increased. CONCLUSIONS: Impact surface type and fall height were found to influence biomechanics associated with injury risk in feet-first free falls as assessed through experimental mock-ups using an instrumented child test dummy. Feet-first falls from short distances (27 in.) (0.69 m) were associated with a low risk of contact-type head injury as assessed using HIC, irrespective of impact surface type.

Acceleration↗