PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “GASTRIC LAVAGE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2000

Yield of gastric lavage and bronchial wash in pulmonary tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the yield of acid-fast bacilli (AFB) in gastric lavage and bronchial washing in adult patients clinically and radiologically suspected of pulmonary tuberculosis but who cannot produce sputum. METHODS: Selected adult patients were admitted to the ward; gastric lavage was done for 3 consecutive days after an overnight fast followed by bronchial wash. Specimens were immediately sent to laboratory for AFB direct smear and culture. RESULTS: The yield of AFB in gastric lavage on direct smear was 16/20 (80%) and 12/20 (60%) in the first and second samples, respectively. When combined, 18/20 (90%) were direct smear positive, while the third sample did not increase the yield. The yield of AFB culture in gastric lavage was 6/20 (30%) in both the first and second samples, while the combined results of the first and second samples were 8/20 (40%). The third sample did not increase the yield. In bronchial wash, AFB direct smear was positive in 18/20 (90%), while culture was positive in 14/20 (70%). CONCLUSION: Gastric lavage and bronchial washing are useful methods for the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in patients who cannot produce sputum. Two gastric lavage specimens are adequate. On comparison, bronchial wash is superior to gastric lavage in culture, but their yield on direct smear is equal.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1999

Is gastric lavage needed in neonates with meconium-stained amniotic fluid?

UNLABELLED: We compared the incidence of complications from meconium-containing gastric fluid in a group of neonates born with meconium-stained amniotic fluid (MSAF) who did not routinely have gastric lavage prior to feeds, versus a group who had elective gastric lavage before the first feed. In the first group, 275 neonates born with MSAF were fed without prior gastric lavage. While 13 developed feeding problems, the other 262 infants (95%) who did not undergo routine gastric lavage remained free of later feeding difficulties or secondary meconium aspiration. In the second group, all 227 neonates with MSAF had elective gastric lavage performed after birth. All remained free of later feeding difficulties or secondary meconium aspiration. CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that gastric lavage is not necessary in most neonates born with meconium-stained amniotic fluid, regardless of the thickness of the meconium-stained fluid, as no complications from meconium-containing gastric fluid were observed.

Amniotic Fluid↗
PubMed1993

Evaluation of gastric emptying using radionuclides: gastric lavage versus ipecac-induced emesis.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy of gastric lavage and ipecac-induced emesis by using a radionuclide marker in a simulated overdose and to determine the amount of material recoverable after lavage fluid appears clear. DESIGN: Case-control, prospective cross-over study. SETTING: Nuclear medicine department of Valley Medical Center, Fresno, California. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Fourteen male and five nonpregnant female adult volunteers with no pre-existing gastrointestinal disease and no medication use. INTERVENTIONS AND MEASUREMENTS: In phase 1, each volunteer ingested 30 capsules labeled with a measured amount of Tc99m with 75 mL H2O followed in five minutes by ipecac-induced emesis. In phase 2, two to four weeks later, each subject was lavaged after ingesting 30 labeled capsules. After lavage appeared clear, a 1,000-mL supplemental lavage was done and analyzed separately. All emesis or gastric lavage fluid was collected and measured for tracer activity. RESULTS: All subjects in the ipecac group vomited with an average time from ipecac to emesis of 19 minutes. Two subjects withdrew from the study, refusing to complete lavage due to discomfort. Based on retrieved material, ipecac-induced emesis returned significantly more tracer (mean +/- SD, 54.1 +/- 21.3%) than lavage until clear (mean +/- SD, 30.3 +/- 17.4%) (P = .0021). Supplemental lavage returned 12.9% of the total recovered marker (SD, 11.6%). The total of initial and supplemental returns from lavage was 35.5% (SD, 21.0%). This return was significantly less than that returned by ipecac-induced emesis (P = .016). CONCLUSION: In this study, ipecac-induced emesis was significantly more effective than gastric lavage in emptying the stomach after simulated overdose. Significant amounts of ingested material are recoverable in gastric lavage return after it appears clear.

Adult↗
PubMed2000

Gastric lavage for liquid poisons.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: This study was conducted to determine whether gastric lavage reduces the absorption of ingested liquids. METHODS: The study design was a randomized controlled human volunteer crossover study in 10 subjects. On 2 separate occasions 2 weeks apart, the volunteers ingested a solution of 4.0 g of acetaminophen in 60 mL of water. Eight blood specimens were obtained over the initial 8 hours for determination of serum acetaminophen concentrations, which were used to calculate routine pharmacokinetic parameters. One hour after 1 drug ingestion, gastric lavage was performed through a 34-F orogastric tube. Serum acetaminophen concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography and a 2-tailed t test was used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: The mean values for area under the concentration curve (+/-SD) for the control and gastric lavage groups were 195+/-31 and 154+/-52 mg/L.hour, respectively (P <.05). The mean reduction in acetaminophen bioavailability because of gastric lavage was 20%+/-28% (95% confidence interval 3 to 37). CONCLUSION: In this experimental model for the ingestion of liquids, gastric lavage at 1 hour resulted in a significant decrease in the mean serum bioavailability of acetaminophen. Nonetheless, this treatment effect is unlikely to be of clinical value because of its modest extent, unreliable performance, and the availability of a more effective, less risky alternative, activated charcoal.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1988

Ipecac-induced emesis and gastric lavage are equally unpleasant.

It has been widely held that gastric lavage is more unpleasant than ipecac-induced emesis. In fact, patients are occasionally threatened with large rubber tubes in order to persuade them to drink ipecac. To confirm that this assumption exists, we asked 41 emergency physicians and nurses who had never personally undergone either procedure to estimate the discomfort of each using a 10 cm unsegmented visual analog scale. This "naive" group thought that gastric lavage would be significantly more unpleasant than ipecac-induced emesis (mean scores: lavage = 6.46, emesis = 4.94; P less than .001, paired t-test). Using the same methods, we asked 16 health professionals who had undergone both procedures as part of another study to score the recalled unpleasantness of each procedure. Among these who had actually experienced both, there was no significant difference between the mean scores for lavage (4.09) and emesis (4.62) (P greater than 0.5, paired t-test). The mean score difference (lavage minus emesis) for the "naive" group was significantly greater than for the experimental group (1.52 vs -.53, P less than .001, unpaired t-test). Among normal volunteers, ipecac-induced emesis and gastric lavage are equally unpleasant gastric emptying procedures.

Gastric Lavage↗
PubMed2000

Role of gastric lavage and broncho-alveolar lavage in the bacteriological diagnosis of childhood pulmonary tuberculosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the mycobacteriological yield from gastric lavage (GL) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), in children with pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: 58 consecutive children with chest radiograph suggestive of tuberculosis and positive Mantoux test or a positive history of family contact with a case of tuberculosis were prospectively subjected to gastric lavage on three consecutive mornings and broncho-alveolar lavage on the last day. The samples were subjected to bacteriological isolation. RESULTS: Samples from 10 (17.2%) children grew Mycobaterium tuberculosis from gastric lavage and 12 children had their BAL positive for this bacteria(p>0.05). Overall mycobacterial isolation was possible in 20 patients (34.4%) as two children had grown Mycobacterim tuberculosis in GL as well as BAL. Addition of BAL to the diagnostic work up increased the mycobacteriological yield from 17.2% with gastric lavage alone to 34.4% when BAL was also performed (p=0.013). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in mycobacterial isolation rates from gastric lavage and BAL when studied in isolation. However, when both GL and BAL are used; these procedures complement each other to double the diagnostic yield.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2000

Indications for, techniques of, complications of, and efficacy of gastric lavage in the treatment of the poisoned child.

Gastrointestinal decontamination is central to the care of poisoned patients, and gastric lavage is one common method for gastrointestinal decontamination. Gastric lavage in pediatric patients should be limited to children who present shortly after a potentially life-threatening ingestion. The routine use of gastric lavage has recently been questioned because of limited outcome data and increased morbidity. If gastric lavage is deemed necessary, proper positioning of the patient and strict attention to appropriate technique are essential to avert complications.

Child↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Recovery of cyclic antidepressants with gastric lavage.

The role of lavage fluid volume in recovery of cyclic antidepressant with gastric lavage was determined in 13 patients treated for moderate to severe cyclic antidepressant intoxication. An orogastric tube was placed, gastric contents aspirated, and gastric lavage performed with 60 to 180 mL aliquots of tap water or 0.9% NaCl for irrigation. A volume of 12.8 +/- 4.4 liters of lavage fluid was instilled, and 97.6 +/- 6.9% of this volume was recovered. The recovered aspirate and lavage fluid were inspected for the presence of particulate matter and saved in 4 to 5 liter collections. Determination of cyclic antidepressant and metabolite concentrations was performed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, and the amount of cyclic antidepressant recovered was calculated. The mean total amount recovered was 110 mg and ranged from 2.4 mg to 342 mg. Of the total amount recovered, 88% +/- 13% was recovered in the first 4 to 5 liters of lavage fluid. An estimate of the dose ingested was available in 7 patients, with 8.7% (0.4% to 21.7%) of the estimated dose recovered by lavage. There were no cases of significant drug recovery in clear lavage fluid. We conclude that if gastric lavage is undertaken in cyclic antidepressant intoxications, it should utilize 5 liters initially and then continue only if particulate matter is seen.

Adolescent↗
PubMed2004

[Evaluation of gastric lavage treatment for severe acute organophosphorus pesticides poisoning complicated by respiratory failure requiring mechanical ventilation].

OBJECTIVE: To discuss the measures of gastric lavage for severe acute organophosphorus pesticides poison (AOPP) patients complicated with respiratory failure and treated with mechanical ventilation. METHODS: 92 cases of respiratory failure due to severe AOPP treated with mechanical ventilation were treated for gastric lavage with nasal gastric tube or gastrotomy. Patients of each gastric lavage method were divided into fasting toxicosis group (fasting group) and post-meal toxicosis group (post-meal group). RESULTS: When treated for lavage with nasal gastric tube, the duration of coma, the time for reaching atropinization and the dosage of atropine needed, the total dosage of atropine used, the mechanical ventilation time, the time for restoring 50% of the normal value of choline esterase, the hospitalization time and charges, the relapse rate, the rate of atropine toxicosis and mortality were respectively: 13 (3 - 24) h, 180 (60 - 290) min, 150 (80 - 310) mg, 300 (90 - 870) mg, 17 (4 - 52) h, (5.0 +/- 2.3) d, 9 (7 - 18) d, (8080 +/- 2570) yuans, 0, 0, and 4.76% in the fasting groups; all the figures were superior to those of the post-meal group with the same treatment: 26 (4 - 55) h, 380 (110 - 690) min, 360 (90 - 730) mg, 3610 (1100 - 9070) mg, 36 (6 - 110) h, (7.8 +/- 3.6) d, 12 (9 - 35) d, (10 720 +/- 3350) yuans, 45%, 30%, and 30.00% (P < 0.01 or P < 0.05). There was no obvious difference between the fasting group and the post-meal group in curative effect, complication occurrence rate and mortality except for the charges when treated with gastrotomy. For the post-meal toxicosis patients gastrotomy showed a better effect than the nasal gastric tube and there was no difference in charges. CONCLUSIONS: It is suggested that severe AOPP patients complicated with respiratory failure and treated with mechanical ventilation should hare lavage with nasal gastric tube, if they were poisoned in fasting state, but they should be washed through gastrotomy if poisoned after meal.

Atropine↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Induced sputum versus gastric lavage for microbiological confirmation of pulmonary tuberculosis in infants and young children: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND: For microbiological confirmation of diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in young children, sequential gastric lavages are recommended; sputum induction has not been regarded as feasible or useful. We aimed to compare the yield of Mycobacterium tuberculosis from repeated induced sputum with that from gastric lavage in young children from an area with a high rate of HIV and tuberculosis. METHODS: We studied 250 children aged 1 month to 5 years who were admitted for suspected pulmonary tuberculosis in Cape Town, South Africa. Sputum induction and gastric lavage were done on three consecutive days according to a standard procedure. Specimens were stained for acid-fast bacilli; each sample was cultured singly for M tuberculosis. FINDINGS: Median age of children was 13 months (IQR 6-24). A positive smear or culture for M tuberculosis was obtained from 62 (25%) children; of these, 58 (94%) were positive by culture, whereas almost half (29 [47%]) were smear positive. Samples from induced sputum and gastric lavage were positive in 54 (87%) and 40 (65%) children, respectively (difference in yield 5.6% [1.4-9.8%], p=0.018). The yield from one sample from induced sputum was similar to that from three gastric lavages (p=1.0). Microbiological yield did not differ between HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected children (p=0.17, odds ratio 0.7 [95% CI 0.3-1.3]). All sputum induction procedures were well tolerated; minor side-effects were increased coughing, epistaxis, vomiting, or wheezing. INTERPRETATION: Sputum induction is safe and useful for microbiological confirmation of tuberculosis in young children. This technique is preferable to gastric lavage for diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis in both HIV-infected and HIV-uninfected infants and children.

AIDS-Related Opportunistic Infections↗
PubMed2003

Does gastric lavage really push poisons beyond the pylorus? A systematic review of the evidence.

Classically, treatment of acute self-poisoning involves resuscitation and supportive care, followed by gastric emptying, administration of activated charcoal, and use of specific antidotes. Recently, however, the practice of gastric emptying has fallen out of favor in the West because physicians have recognized its complications and the lack of evidence for clinical benefit from its practice. Authoritative position statements have stated that forced emesis should not be used and that gastric lavage should be used in restricted settings. One commonly cited complication of gastric lavage is propulsion of poison beyond the pyloric sphincter into the small bowel. We have carried out a systematic search for studies addressing this issue and found only 2. The first, a randomized controlled trial of patients presenting to an emergency department, reported propulsion of poison into the small bowel and has been widely cited as showing evidence for such a complication. However, analysis of the data presented in this article shows no significant difference in the number of radio-opaque marker pellets present in the small bowel after gastric lavage, ipecac-induced forced emesis, or no intervention. The second, an observational study using human volunteers, showed significantly less poison in the small bowel after gastric lavage than after no intervention. In conclusion, it seems that no published data support the statement that gastric lavage forces poison into the small bowel.

Gastric Lavage↗
PubMed2000

Efficacy of activated charcoal versus gastric lavage half an hour after ingestion of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of activated charcoal and gastric lavage in preventing the absorption of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil 30 min after drug ingestion. METHODS: In this randomized cross-over study with three phases, nine healthy volunteers received a single oral dose of 150 mg moclobemide, 10 mg temazepam, and 80 mg verapamil after an overnight fast. Thirty minutes later, they were assigned to one of the following treatments: 25 g activated charcoal as a suspension in 200 ml water, gastric lavage (10x200 ml), or 200 ml water (control). Plasma concentrations of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil were determined up to 24 h. RESULTS: Activated charcoal reduced the area under the plasma concentration time curve from 0 h to 24 h (AUC0-24 h) of moclobemide and temazepam by 55% (P<0.05) and by 45% (P<0.05), respectively. The AUC0-24 h of verapamil was not significantly reduced by charcoal. Gastric lavage decreased the AUC0-24 h of moclobemide by 44% (P<0.05), but had no significant effect on that of temazepam or verapamil. The peak plasma concentration (Cmax) of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil was reduced by 40%, 29% (P<0.05), and 16%, respectively, by activated charcoal. Gastric lavage did not significantly decrease the Cmax of any of these drugs. CONCLUSION: The absorption of moclobemide, temazepam, and verapamil can be moderately reduced by activated charcoal given 30 min after drug ingestion, while gastric lavage seems to be less effective.

Administration, Oral↗
PubMedDate not supplied

A randomized controlled trial of gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.

GOALS: We hypothesized that large volume gastric lavage prior to endoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding would improve the quality of endoscopic examination. BACKGROUND: Blood retained in the stomach can impair visualization during esophagogastroduodenoscopy. Patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding and a retained gastric fundic pool during endoscopy may have worse outcomes than patients without a retained fundic pool. No trials to date have evaluated if large volume gastric lavage prior to endoscopy improves visualization during acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding. STUDY METHODS: Patients with acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding were randomized to esophagogastroduodenoscopy alone or large volume tap water gastric lavage prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy. The quality of endoscopic visualization was assessed using a 5-point scale. Clinical outcomes were compared for lavaged and nonlavaged patients. RESULTS: A total of 39 patients were randomized. In 1 patient, lavage was unsuccessful. The quality of visualization was not significantly different between groups for the esophagus, gastric antrum, or duodenum but was significantly better for the gastric fundus for patients randomized to lavage (P = 0.02). There was no significant difference between groups for ability to define a bleeding source, achieve hemostasis, recurrent bleeding, need for repeat endoscopy, and length of stay or death. There were no complications. CONCLUSIONS: Large volume gastric lavage prior to esophagogastroduodenoscopy for acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding is safe and provides better visualization of the gastric fundus.

Acute Disease↗
PubMed1986

Ipecac-induced emesis versus gastric lavage: a controlled study in normal adults.

Ipecac-induced emesis and gastric lavage are the two procedures most widely used to evacuate the stomachs of patients who have ingested poisons. To resolve a long-standing controversy over the relative efficacy of these two methods, the authors carried out a controlled study in which they administered 25 100-micrograms tablets of cyanocobalamin (vitamin B12) to 18 fasting normal adult volunteers on two separate days. On one day, each subject had emesis induced with 30 ml of ipecac syrup followed by 1,000 ml of tap water; on another day, each underwent gastric aspiration and lavage with a 1.1-cm orogastric tube using 3 l of fluid. Both procedures were begun 10 minutes after the ingestion. The recovered vomitus or gastric washings from each procedure were then analyzed for elemental cobalt using atomic absorption spectrophotometry. The mean rate of recovery of the ingested tracer with ipecac-induced emesis was only 28%, whereas gastric lavage resulted in retrieval of 45% (paired t-test, P less than 0.005). In this study, carefully performed gastric lavage was the more effective method of gastric evacuation of tablets in the adult subject.

Adult↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Is there excessive use of gastric lavage in the treatment of self-poisoning?

An attempt to identify those factors which influenced the decision to perform gastric lavage in 236 cases of deliberate self-poisoning seen over 6 months showed that 87% of patients seen within 4 hours of ingestion of the poison had a lavage, irrespective of the number of tablets and nature of drug taken. Overall, 77% had a gastric lavage. Most of the late lavages were carried out for salicylate ingestion. The changing pattern of drugs used for attempted selfpoisoning suggests that at least 50% of patients are being unnecessarily subjected to gastric lavage.

Acetaminophen↗
PubMed1999

Effect of activated charcoal alone or given after gastric lavage in reducing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram.

AIMS: The efficacy of activated charcoal alone, and gastric lavage followed by charcoal in reducing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram was studied in healthy volunteers. METHODS: In a randomized cross-over study with three phases, nine healthy volunteers were administered single oral doses of 5 mg diazepam, 400 mg ibuprofen and 20 mg citalopram, taken simultaneously after an overnight fast. Thirty minutes later, the subjects were assigned to one of the following treatments: 200 ml water (control), 25 g activated charcoal as a suspension in 200 ml water or gastric lavage followed by 25 g charcoal in suspension given through the lavage tube. Plasma concentrations of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram were determined up to 10 h. RESULTS: The AUC(0,10 h) of diazepam was reduced by 27% (P<0.05) by both charcoal alone and charcoal combined with lavage. The increase in plasma diazepam concentration from 0.5 h onwards was prevented by both interventions (P</=0.05), whereas the Cmax of diazepam was not significantly affected by either treatment. The AUC(0, 10 h) of ibuprofen was reduced by 49% (P<0.05) after the combination treatment and by 30% (P<0.05) after charcoal alone, but there was no significant difference between these two treatments. Both charcoal alone and the combination treatment were equally effective in preventing the increase in plasma ibuprofen from 0.5 h onwards (P<0.01). The Cmax of ibuprofen was reduced by 45% (P<0.05) and by 21% (P=NS), respectively. The AUC(0,10 h) of citalopram was reduced by 51% (P<0.05) after both charcoal alone and charcoal combined with lavage, and the Cmax by 52% (P<0.05) and 54% (P<0.05), respectively. The increase in plasma citalopram concentration from 0.5 h onwards was reduced by about 50% (P<0.01) by both interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Activated charcoal alone and charcoal combined with lavage showed similar efficacy in preventing the absorption of diazepam, ibuprofen and citalopram. These results suggest that gastric lavage needs not be routinely performed before administration of charcoal.

Adult↗
PubMed1985

Automated gastric lavage and a comparison of 0.9% normal saline solution and tap water irrigant.

Gastric lavage is used frequently in the emergency treatment of upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage, toxin ingestion, drug overdose, and other cases requiring repetitive gastric irrigation. An effective automatic method of gastric lavage is described and evaluated. The use of tap water versus 0.9% normal saline solution also is compared. There is no difference in prelavage and postlavage blood cell concentrations or electrolyte profile with either irrigant. The advantages of tap water lavage fluid are discussed.

Adolescent↗