SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Generalization, Stimulus”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2000

(+)Amphetamine-stimulus generalization to an herbal ephedrine product.

We have previously demonstrated that a (+)amphetamine stimulus generalizes both to (-)ephedrine and caffeine. Using rats trained to discriminate intraperitoneal (IP) administration of 1.0 mg/kg of (+)amphetamine (ED(50) = 0.4 mg/kg) from saline vehicle in a standard two-lever drug discrimination procedure, the present investigation shows that the (+)amphetamine stimulus generalizes to (+)amphetamine (ED(50) = 1.0 mg/kg) when administered via the intragastric (IG) route, and that (+)amphetamine appears about 2. 5-fold less potent when administered via the IG route compared to the IP route. Likewise, (-)ephedrine (ED(50) = 10.8 mg/kg) and caffeine (ED(50) = 32.9 mg/kg) are also 2.5-fold less potent when administered via the IG route compared to their potency when administered via the IP route. The (+)amphetamine stimulus also generalizes to an IG-administered herbal preparation (i.e., Herbal XTC; the herbal preparation possesses an approximate potency roughly comparable to what might have been expected on the basis of its reported ephedrine and/or caffeine content. These results demonstrate, for the first time, that an ephedrine-containing herbal preparation can produce a (+)amphetamine-like effect in animals.

Animals↗

PubMed1975

Stimulus generalization following extra-dimensional training in educationally subnormal (severely) children.

The use of discrimination learning paradigms in the study of attentional transfer is discussed. The technique of go/no-go discrimination learning followed by stimulus generalization testing is contrasted with the more familiar simultaneous learning paradigm followed by a shift in the relevant cues. In the former paradigm the effect of training a discrimination on one dimension on the slope of the stimulus generalization gradient on an independent gradient dimension (extra-dimensional training) is assessed. A steepening of the gradient relative to appropriate control procedures is taken as evidence of positive attentional transfer. The relevance of the technique to the detailed study of attentional transfer in educationally subnormal (severely) (ESN(S)) children is considered. In Expt. I nine ESN(S) children were trained in a go/no-go discrimination involving stimuli differing in orientation, and were generalization tested on a dimension that was orthogonal, namely hue. Of the six subjects who learnt the discrimination five showed clear decremental gradients on the hue dimension. In contrast a Pseudo-Discrimination group (PD) of eight subjects matched to those in the TD group showed no gradients. These subjects were not trained in the orientation discrimination, but were reinforced for responding on 50 per cent of each of the S+ and S- stimulus presentations. They thus received equal exposure to, but no differential training on, the orientation dimension. An S+ only group of four subjects who received no exposure to the orientation stimuli showed no gradients when stimulus generalization testing on the hue continuum was carried out. The result is discussed in terms of transfer deriving from stimulus control by relational aspects of the stimuli; in terms of control by constant irrelevant stimuli; and in terms of the study of stimulus control in ESN(S) children. In Expt. II the influence of the codability of the colours on the location of the peak of the stimulus generalization gradients in the TD group is investigated.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1985

The quantal nature of controlling stimulus-response relations as measured in tests of stimulus generalization.

This paper is a selective review of research that addresses the validity of two interpretations of stimulus generalization. One interpretation, referred to as the descriptive stimulus-control interpretation, proposes that during stimulus generalization a continuous relation exists between stimulus and response dimensions. The other interpretation, referred to as the quantal interpretation, proposes that a stimulus-response relation functions as a unit that may or may not occur. From the latter viewpoint, the continuity typically obtained during generalization tests is deemed to be artifactual and to result from averaging across multiple controlling stimulus-response relations. Studies examining the contribution of these multiple relations to generalization gradients are reviewed. With few exceptions, the quantal interpretation appears to better characterize the results of these studies. Implications for peak shift, selection of analytical level, and identification of the behavioral unit are discussed, as well as factors that may determine the acceptability of the quantal interpretation.

Animals↗

PubMed1963