PubMed1991
Previous studies allow the construction of three distinct models of the binding of G and arginine within the active site of the Tetrahymena self-splicing preribosomal precursor RNA. These models (base triple, axial I and axial II) are now distinguished by measurements on the specificity of RNAs with nucleotide substitutions at positions spanning the site. Because the semi-conserved unpaired nucleotide 263 has no effect on substrate or inhibitor selection by the Tetrahymena RNA we conclude that the axial I model is improbable. In contrast, data with substituted RNAs and nucleoside analogs suggest that nucleotide 265 makes a hydrogen bond with the substrate. Accordingly the active site appears axial because substrate contacts exist at more than one nucleotide on the 5' side of the P7 helix. The effects of this hydrogen bond are observable in cases where the donor or acceptor is on the RNA, whether nucleotide 265 is a purine or pyrimidine, or whether nucleotide 265 is mispaired, wobble paired or normally paired. This pattern is consistent with the axial II model. Molecular dynamics and energy minimization calculations lead to the same conclusions as these site-directed substitutions; the base triple and axial I models are unstable dynamically. Under thermal agitation, the third model site (axial II) is transformed to a related, but more stable structure, axial III. The axial III active site is characterized by the extrusion of the conserved bulged base 263 from the P7 helix, a semi-pocket for G base formed by stacking of nucleotide 262, and formation of all bonds to the G base originally proposed for both the base triple and axial II sites. Because of these hydrogen bonds the axial III site is also consistent with data on enzymatic specificity. The axial III model indicates an unforeseen capacity for pocket formation within the groove of an RNA helix, suggests that the site may be unusually flexible, and bears on a hypothesis concerning the origin of the genetic code.