SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “HBV”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1988

Detection of antibodies to proteins encoded by the X-region of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in sera of patients with chronic HBV infection: correlation with other HBV markers.

The genome of hepatitis B virus (HBV) contains a fourth open reading frame (ORF), designated X-region. It was the aim of our study to test sera of patients with chronic HBV infection for the presence of antibodies reactive with a 17 kd gene product of the X-ORF. For this purpose, a 35S-X-ORF-encoded protein, synthesized in vitro, was applied as antigen for the detection of antibodies to HBx proteins in sera of 86 individuals. Antibodies reacting with a gene product of the X-ORF were present in 10 out of 24 HBsAg-positive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (PLC) or liver cirrhosis and in one out of 8 HBsAg-carriers. In addition, the antibodies could also be detected in 6 out of 35 sera from patients with PLC or cirrhosis negative for HBsAg but positive for anti-HBc and anti-HBs. Antibodies to a gene product of the X-ORF can be detected in sera of patients with chronic HBV-related liver disease, independently of HBsAg and the HBeAg/anti-HBe system.

Genes, Viral↗

PubMed2004

Lamivudine prophylaxis of liver allograft HBV reinfection in HBV related cirrhotic patients after liver transplantation.

BACKGROUND: Liver allograft hepatitis B virus (HBV) reinfection and hepatitis B (HB) recurrence jeopardize the long-term survival of recipient and liver allograft. Lamivudine has been referred as a novel antiviral agent against HBV in HBV cirrhotic patients even in liver transplantation setting. We assessed the prophylatic effect of lamivudine on liver allograft HBV reinfection and clarified the dynamic changes of HBV markers in HBV related decompensated liver cirrhosis after liver transplantation. METHODS: Twenty-five recipients were divided into three groups: HBV active replication group (15 recipients), HBV inactive replication group (7), and control group (3). 100 mg/d lamivudine was administered preoperatively except in the control group. The HBV markers of serial sera and liver biopsy samples of the 25 recipients were evaluated regularly with enzyme-linked radioimmunoassay, HBV DNA fluorescent quantitative assay, immunohistochemical staining, labelled streptavidin biotin (LSAB) and digoxin labelled HBV DNA hybridization in situ. The dynamic alternation of HBV markers under lamivudine prophylaxis was observed. RESULTS: In the HBV active replication group who had received lamivudine 2 weeks before liver transplantation, serum HBV DNA positive converted to negative by 80%. HBsAg of all recipients disappeared after liver transplantation, but corresponding antibodies of HBV appeared within one week after the operation. HBsAb 9/15, HBcAb 13/15 and HBeAb 11/15 appeared and subsided gradually within 24 weeks. HBV DNA in sera was kept negative; HBsAg, HBcAg and HBV DNA hybridization in situ of liver biopsy samples remained negative after use of lamivudine. Ten of the 15 recipients showed clearance of HBV, and per se HBV markers were undetectable both in serum and liver biopsy samples between 12 to 44 weeks (24 weeks on average). The 1-, 2-year survival rates were 83% in this group. Two of the 15 recipients developed HBV allograft reinfection or recurrence of hepatitis 2 years after lamivudine monoprophylaxis (2/15, 13.3%). In the HBV inactive replication group, the outcome was similar to that of the HBV active group. The HBV antibody frequency was HBsAb 4/7, HBcAb 6/7, and HBeAb 2/7. Three of 7 recipients showed HBV clearance both in sera and liver biopsy samples, whereas in the control group all 3 recipients developed HBV allograft reinfection and recurrent hepatitis 8, 10, 12 months postoperatively; one of them died of fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis, and the remaining 2 recovered after additional lamivudine therapy. The overall allograft reinfection rate was 9.1% (2/22) and the overall 1-, 2-year survival rates were 87% in the lamivudine prophylaxis group. CONCLUSIONS: Lamivudine prophylaxis can prevent effectively liver allograft from HBV reinfection in patients with HBV-related decompensated liver cirrhosis even in HBV active replication recipient after liver transplantation. Its long-term outcome remains to be studied.

Adult↗

PubMed1997

HCV and HBV coexist in HBsAg-negative patients with HCV viraemia: possibility of coinfection in these patients must be considered in HBV-high endemic area.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common cancers and is highly associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in Korea. The role of HBV and hepatitis C virus (HCV) in HCC patients who are negative for hepatitis B surface antigens (HBsAg) remains poorly defined. It has been suggested that HCV core protein may impair the polymerase activity of HBV in vitro, potentially lowering HBV titre in coinfected patients. Therefore, routine enzyme immunoassay may not detect HBV, in spite of the presence of HBV viraemia in low titres. The aim of this study was to confirm the coexistence of HBV viraemia in hepatitis C-infected patients with HCC who have apparent HBsAg seronegativity and to establish the need for clinical reinterpretation of enzyme immunoassay (EIA) serological tests of HBsAg in patients with HCV viraemia and HCC. The serological profiles of HBV and HCV in 616 patients with HCC were analysed and the coinfection rate of HCV and HBV investigated. Sera were obtained from 16 patients who were both anti-HCV and HCV-RNA positive but HBsAg negative, and tested for HBV by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Eleven non-A and non-B chronic hepatitis patients without HCC who had the same profiles of anti-HCV, HCV-RNA, and HBsAg were tested for HBV by PCR. As a control group, sera were obtained from 15 patients with HCC and 30 non-A and non-B chronic hepatitis patients without HCC; both were anti-HCV, HCV-RNA, and HBsAg negative and tested for HBV PCR. Of the 616 patients with HCC, 450 (73.1%) had current HBV infection, 48 (7.8%) had anti-HCV antibodies, and nine (1.5%) had viral markers of both HCV and HBV by serological profiles. Of the 27 patients with HCV viraemia and HBsAg seronegativity (16 with HCC; 11 with non-A non-B chronic hepatitis), 14 (51.9%) showed HBV viraemia by PCR. In contrast, of the 75 patients in the control group (45 with HCC; 30 with non-A and non-B chronic hepatitis) who were both HCV PCR negative and HBsAg negative, five (11.1%) showed HBV viraemia by PCR. The PCR for HBV revealed coexistent HBV viraemia in HCV viraemia patients, despite HBsAg negativity by EIA. In HBV-endemic areas, the possibility of coinfection of HBV in HBsAg-negative patients with HCV viraemia should be considered and molecular analysis for HBV-DNA performed.

Adult↗

PubMed2006

HBV vaccination of HCV-infected patients with occult HBV infection and anti-HBc-positive blood donors.

Anti-HBc positivity is a frequent cause of donation rejection at blood banks. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection may also occur in HBsAg-negative patients, a situation denoted occult infection. Similarly, very low levels of HBV-DNA have also been found in the sera of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, even in the absence of serum HBsAg. Initially we searched for HBV-DNA in serum of 100 blood donors and 50 HCV-infected patients who were HBsAg negative/anti-HBc positive by nested-PCR and by an HBV monitor commercial test for HBV-DNA. Anti-HBs seroconversion rates were measured in 100 blood donors and in 22 patients with chronic HCV infection after HBV vaccination to determine if the HBV vaccination could eliminate an occult HBV infection in these individuals. Occult HBV infection was detected in proportionally fewer blood donors (6/100 = 6%) than chronic hepatitis C patients (12/50 = 24%) (P < 0.05). We noted seroconversion in 6/6 (100%) HBV-DNA(+) and in 84/94 (89.4%) HBV-DNA(-) blood donors (P > 0.05). All subjects who were HBV-DNA(+) before the first dose of HBV vaccine (D1), became HBV-DNA(-) after D1, D2, and D3. Among 22 HCV-positive patients, 10 HBV-DNA(+) and 12 HBV-DNA(-), seroconversion was observed in 9/10 (90%) HBV-DNA(+) and in 9/12 (75%) HBV-DNA(-) subjects (P > 0.05). The disappearance of HBV-DNA in the majority of vaccinated patients suggests that residual HBV can be eliminated in patients with occult infection.

Adult↗

PubMed2004

HBV cccDNA in patients' sera as an indicator for HBV reactivation and an early signal of liver damage.

AIM: To evaluate the covalently closed circle DNA (cccDNA) level of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients' liver and sera. METHODS: HBV DNA was isolated from patients' liver biopsies and sera. A sensitive real-time PCR method, which is capable of differentiation of HBV viral genomic DNA and cccDNA, was used to quantify the total HBV cccDNA. The total HBV viral DNA was quantitated by real-time PCR using a HBV diagnostic kit (PG Biotech, LTD, Shenzhen, China) described previously. RESULTS: For the first time, we measured the level of HBV DNA and cccDNA isolated from ten HBV patients' liver biopsies and sera. In the liver biopsies, cccDNA was detected from all the biopsy samples. The copy number of cccDNA ranged from from 0.03 to 173.1 per cell, the copy number of total HBV DNA ranged from 0.08 to 3 717 per cell. The ratio of total HBV DNA to cccDNA ranged from 1 to 3 406. In the sera, cccDNA was only detected from six samples whereas HBV viral DNA was detected from all ten samples. The ratio of cccDNA to total HBV DNA ranged from 0 to 1.77%. To further investigate the reason why cccDNA could only be detected in some patients' sera, we performed longitudinal studies. The cccDNA was detected from the patients' sera with HBV reactivation but not from the patients' sera without HBV reactivation. The level of cccDNA in the sera was correlated with ALT and viral load in the HBV reactivation patients. CONCLUSION: HBV cccDNA is actively transcribed and replicated in some patients' hepatocytes, which is reflected by a high ratio of HBV total DNA vs cccDNA. Detection of cccDNA in the liver biopsy will provide an end-point for the anti-HBV therapy. The occurrence of cccDNA in the sera is an early signal of liver damage, which may be another important clinical parameter.

Alanine Transaminase↗

PubMed2003

Dynamic alteration of HBV markers on active HBV replicative recipients after liver transplantation: a preliminary report.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the dynamic alternations of HBV markers of active HBV replication recipients receiving lamivudine prophylaxis after liver transplantation. METHODS: Serial liver biopsy samples and sera were obtained from 15 recipients and examined with enzyme-linked radioimmunoassay for HBsAg, HBeAg, HBsAb, HBcAb and HBeAb, and fluorescent quantitative assay for quantitation of HBV DNA in serum. Immunohistochemical staining of HBsAg, HBcAg and HBV DNA hybridization in situ were used to detect HBV markers in liver biopsy samples. RESULTS: 100 mg lamivudine taken orally every day for 2 weeks before transplantation enabled 12 (80%) of 15 active viral replication recipients (HBV DNA positive) to converse to HBV DNA negative. HBsAb, HBcAb and HBeAb in serum emerged in 1-2 weeks after liver transplantation, and disappeared gradually within 6 months; HBV DNA fluorescent quantitative assay showed constant negativity in serum. Immunohistochemical staining of HBsAg, HBcAg and HBV DNA hybridization in situ in liver biopsy samples showed negative results synchorously. Eight of the 15 HBV active replication recipients lost HBV markers thoroughly both in serology and tissue staining as well as HBV DNA hybridization in situ of serial liver biopsy samples from 12 to 44 weeks after liver transplantation. Should any of HBsAg, HBeAg in serology and HBsAg, HBcAg in immunohistochemical staining was positive, or HBV DNA detectable in serum, or HBV DNA hybridization in situ in liver tissue positive, allograft HBV reinfection or De novo liver allograft infection could be diagnosed. Furthermore, if associated with elevation of ALT and bilirubin, the diagnosis of HBV hepatitis recurrence could be established. CONCLUSION: Allograft HBV reinfection or De novo liver allograft infection in active viral replication recipients could be prevented with lamivudine regimen, and further clearance of HBV may be possible if proper measures are taken.

Adult↗

PubMed1998

Relationship between HBV viremia level of pregnant women and intrauterine infection:neated PCR for detection of HBV DNA.

AIM:To determine the incidence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in trauterine infection and to explore the relationship between HBV viremia level of pregnant women and HBV intrauterine infection.METHODS: Sixty-nine pregnant women were divided into three groups. Group A, 41 HBsAg positive patients, 14 of them were HBeAg positive (group A1), and 27 HBeAg negative (group A2); Group B, 12 HBsAg negative patients, but positive for anti-HBs and/or anti-HBe and/or anti-HBc; and Group C, 16 patients negative for all HBV markers. Blood samples of mothers were taken at delivery, samples of their infants were collected within 24 hours after birth (before injection of HBIG and HBV vaccine). All the serum samples were stored at -20°. HBV serum markers were tested by radioimmunoassay and HBV NDA were detected by nested polymerase chain reaction.RESULTS: In group C, all of 16 newborns were negative for HBsAg and HBV DNA. In group A, 7 infants were HBsAg positive (17.1%), and 17 (41.5%) were HBV DNA positive (P < 0.05). The incidence of intrauterine HBV infection was much higher in group A1 than that in group A2 (HBsAg 42.9% vs 3.7%, HBV DNA 92.9% vs 14.8%, P < 0.05). The incidence of HBV intrauterine infection was significantly different between high and low HBV viremia of mothers (93.3% vs 42.9%,P < 0.05).CONCLUSION: The incidence of HBV intrauterine infection is high when HBV DNA in newborns detected with nested PCR is used as a marker of HBV infection. It is related to HBV viremia level of mothers.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2006

[Intrauterine HBV infection: risk factors and impact of HBV DNA].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the risk factors of intrauterine hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection and the impact of HBV DNA on the infection. METHODS: The serum levels of HBsAg, HbsAb, HBeAg, HBeAb, HBcAb and HBV DNA were determined in blood samples from 230 HBsAg-positive pregnant women and their newborns by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and fluorescence quantitative PCR (FQ-PCR), respectively. The newborns acquiring HBV infection via intrauterine transmission were selected as the case group and others as the control group. The risk factors for intrauterine HBV infection were analyzed by non-conditional logistic regression model. RESULTS: Six infants were found to be HBsAg-positive, and 18 HBV DNA-positive, and 3 of them were positive for both HBsAg and HBV DNA. The rate of intrauterine HBV infection was 9.6% (22/230). The grade of HBV DNA level was identified as the only risk factor of intrauterine HBV infection by non-conditional logistic regression model, with odds ratio (OR) of 1.57 (95% confidence interval 1.12-2.21). Of the 119 pregnant women positive for HBV DNA, 18 were diagnosed as having intrauterine HBV infection, and the likeliness of the infection significantly increased for a maternal serum HBV DNA level > or =10(7) copies/ml (chi(2)=7.92, P<0.05). CONCLUSION: The grade of serum HBV DNA level is the predominant risk factor for intrauterine HBV infection in pregnant women, and for those with serum HBV DNA lever > or =10(7) copies/ml, the chance for intrauterine HBV infection can be significantly increased.

DNA, Viral↗

PubMed1998

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-transgenic mice as an investigative tool to study immunopathology during HBV infection.

An overview is given regarding the use of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transgenic mice as an animal model of the HBV-carrier state. Initially, we show how HBV-transgenic mice have contributed insights into the immunopathobiological processes during HBV infection and later, we show how this new information from the experiments with HBV-transgenic mice could be used to develop new methods to combat HBV infection. By microinjecting the full or selected parts of the HBV-genome into the fertilized eggs of inbred mice, different laboratories have developed different lines of HBV-transgenic mice, which express products of the HBV genome and also show signs of HBV replication. Studies in HBV-transgenic mice have provided insights into the process of destruction of hepatocytes, the critical role of cytokines in controlling HBV replication and gene expression, mechanisms underlying the immune response defect in chronic HBV-carriers and the critical role of antigen presenting cells (APC), especially that of antigen presenting dendritic cells in persistent HBV infection. All this new information has given us a better understanding about HBV immunopathobiology, and has led to the development of new therapeutic approaches to combat HBV infection.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Transfusion-transmitted HBV infection in an endemic area: the necessity of more sensitive screening for HBV carriers.

BACKGROUND: By NAT, HBV DNA is occasionally detectable in blood donors with past HBV infection but negative for HBsAg. Whether or not these donors can cause transfusion-transmitted HBV infections is uncertain. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: To determine whether or not donors with past HBV infection but negative for HbsAg can cause HBV transfusion-transmitted infections, recipients followed for blood transfusion in a university medical center in Taiwan were studied. HBV DNA and serologic markers were tested in donors and recipients. RESULTS: Of 1,038 enrolled recipients, 910 completed the 6-month post-transfusion follow-up visit. Of these, only 39 patients (4.3%) tested negative on the pretransfusion sample for HBsAg, anti-HBs, anti-HBc, and HBV DNA by PCR. These 39 HBV-naive recipients had been transfused with blood from 147 donations for which stored samples were available for HBV DNA testing by PCR; 11 of these HBsAg-negative samples tested positive for HBV DNA and anti-HBc. Two of the 11 patients who received the HBV-DNA-positive donations (18%) became positive for HBV DNA, and one seroconverted to anti-HBc and finally to anti-HBs, with a mild transient elevation of serum ALT activities. Based on the one confirmed case of HBV transmission, a projection was made that approximately 200 post-transfusion HBV infections could occur in one million units of transfused blood in Taiwan. CONCLUSIONS: In HBV-endemic areas like Taiwan, where blood donors are screened for HBsAg only, the risk of transfusion-transmitted HBV appears to be substantial. Implementation of NAT for blood screening in these settings warrants consideration.

Antibodies, Viral↗

PubMed2003

The lack of effect of therapeutic vaccination with a pre-S2/S HBV vaccine in the immune tolerant phase of chronic HBV infection.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: Even if the results are controversial and preliminary, several reports suggest that the HBV vaccine might be effective in treating HBV infection. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of specific anti-HBV vaccination for the immune tolerance phase of chronic HBV infection in a randomized, controlled study. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The 47 subjects included patients that were treatment-naive with hepatitis B e antigen positivity, active hepatitis B virus replication as measured by hepatitis B virus DNA levels, persistently normal alanine transaminase levels, and with minimal or absent disease activity by liver biopsy. Thirty patients were given three intramuscular injections of 20 micro g of a pre-S2/S vaccine (GenHevac-B) on days 0, 30, and 60, and the remaining 17 patients were included in the control group. The efficacy of vaccination was evaluated by testing for loss of serum HBV DNA or decrease in its level and for HBeAg seroconversion. A significant decrease in HBV DNA levels was accepted as a decrease of >50% of initial values. The complete response was defined as loss of HBV DNA in serum with HBeAg seroconversion. Postvaccination follow-up lasted 12 months after the first dose. RESULTS: No significant effects were observed in the vaccination population in the reduction of HBV DNA to undetectable levels, or to <50% of prevaccination levels, in HBeAg/anti-HBe seroconversion, or in transaminase levels. There was an early clearance/decrease in HBV DNA levels in five vaccinated patients by 3 months, and none in controls (P = 0.143), and two of them had sustained responses later. At the end of follow-up, complete response is almost similar in study as well as control group (13% vs. 12%, P > 0.05). Disappearance of serum HBV DNA was more frequently observed in those patients who had pretreatment viremia of <100 pg/mL in both groups. The median levels of HBV DNA and alanine transaminase activity between baseline and 12 months did not differ significantly in both groups. All patients remained HBsAg positive and none developed anti-HBs. No serious adverse event was encountered in vaccinated patients, and the therapy was well tolerated. Follow-up lasted a median of 16 months (range 12-30 months) for the study group and 18 months (range 12-31months) for the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Immunotherapy with specific anti-HBV vaccine in the immune tolerance phase of chronic HBV infection did not offer additional benefit. New immunotherapeutic strategies to control HBV infection by specific HBV vaccines in chronically infected subjects are needed.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

Quantification of intrahepatic hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA in patients with chronic HBV infection.

No data are available about the amount of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genomes in liver of patients with chronic HBV infection. The aim of this study was to quantify the intrahepatic HBV DNA in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-positive patients with either active or suppressed viral replication and in HBsAg-negative subjects with occult HBV infection. We optimized the Roche "Amplicor HBV Monitor" kit for quantifying liver HBV DNA and analyzed hepatic DNA extracts and serum samples from 19 HBs-Ag-positive and 43 HBsAg-negative individuals. Eight of the HBsAg carriers had active HBV replication, and for 3 of them we analyzed samples obtained before and at the end of 1 year of lamivudine treatment. Five hepatitis Delta virus (HDV) coinfected patients and 6 healthy HBsAg carriers had inhibited HBV activity. Among the HBsAg-negative subjects 21 had occult HBV infection and 22 had no evidence of HBV infection. The median of HBV genomes per microgram of liver DNA milliliter of serum was 34,500 to 2,620,000 in patients with active viral replication, 20,000 to 3,900, 000 before and 10,000 to 2,800 at the end of therapy in lamivudine-treated individuals, 9,800 to 600 in HDV-infected individuals, and 7,450 to 17,400 in healthy HBsAg carriers. These data indicate that cases with suppressed HBV activity, despite the very low levels of viremia, maintain a relatively high amount of intrahepatic viral genomes. This virus reservoir is likely involved in HBV reactivation, which is usually observed after stopping lamivudine treatment. Finally, the analysis of cases with occult HBV infection showed that the assay we used was able to specifically detect and quantify as few as 100 copies of viral genomes per microgram of liver DNA.

Adult↗

PubMed2005

Impaired functional capacities of liver dendritic cells from murine hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers: relevance to low HBV-specific immune responses.

The chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carrier exhibits ongoing replication of HBV and expresses abundant amounts of HBV-related antigens in the liver. However, HBV-specific immune responses are either absent or narrowly focused in these subjects. With the postulation that impaired functional abilities of liver dendritic cells (DCs) might be responsible for this, we assessed the functions of liver DCs in HBV transgenic mice (HBV-TM), an animal model of the HBV carrier state. Liver DCs were isolated from normal C57BL/6 mice and HBV-TM without the use of cytokines or growth factors. Lymphoproliferative assays were conducted to evaluate the ability of liver DCs to induce the proliferation of allogenic T lymphocytes and hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-enriched T lymphocytes. Liver DCs were stimulated with viral and bacterial products to assess their cytokine-producing capacities. In comparison to liver DCs from normal C57BL/6 mice, liver DCs from HBV-TM exhibited significantly decreased T cell proliferation-inducing capacities in allogenic mixed leucocyte reaction (P <0.05) and HBsAg-enriched T lymphocytes proliferation assays (P <0.05). Liver DCs from HBV-TM produced significantly lower levels of interleukin-12p70, tumour necrosis factor-alpha, interferon-gamma, and interleukin-6 (P <0.05) compared to liver DCs from normal C57BL/6 mice. This study provides evidence that liver DCs from HBV-TM had impaired ability to induce both innate and adaptive immune responses. This might account for a weak and almost undetectable HBV-specific immune response in chronic HBV carriers. This inspires hope that up-regulation of the functions of liver DCs in situ may have therapeutic implications in chronic HBV carriers.

Animals↗

PubMed2005

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA screening of blood donations in minipools with the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test.

BACKGROUND: The risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission by blood transfusion (estimated at 1 in 63,000-1 in 205,000 units in the United States) exceeds that of hepatitis C virus (HCV) or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Reduction of window-period HBV transmissions through detection of HBV DNA-positive units by minipool nucleic acid testing (MP NAT) would be expected to decrease this risk. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A large multicenter study of the COBAS AmpliScreen HBV test (Roche Molecular Systems) was conducted on minipools of 24 blood donation specimens. The yield of HBV DNA-positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative window-period donations was determined relative to current and newly licensed HBsAg assays. Donors with selected HBV DNA, HBsAg, and anti-hepatitis B core antigen (HBc) results were further evaluated. RESULTS: The detection rate of window-period units was 1 in 352,451 (95% confidence interval, 1 in 2,941,176-1 in 97,561). Assay specificity was high (99.9964%). HBV DNA was detected in 84 percent of HBsAg-positive, anti-HBc-positive donations by MP NAT and in 94 percent when individual-donation (ID) NAT was added. HBV DNA was detected in 0.03 percent of HBsAg-negative, anti-HBc-positive donations by MP NAT and in 0.41 percent when ID NAT was added. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of HBV MP NAT will provide an increment in safety relative to HBV serologic screening, similar to that for HCV and in excess of that for HIV. Our data indicate that the implementation of HBV MP NAT would likely interdict 39 HBV window-period units and prevent 56 cases of transfusion-transmitted HBV infection annually. The current data indicate that HBV MP NAT should not lead to discontinuation of anti-HBc testing but that discontinuation of HBsAg testing with retention of anti-HBc testing may be possible.

Blood Donors↗

PubMed1992

Correlation between the prevalence of serum HBV DNA and immunoserologic HBV markers in the subjects with or without hepatitis.

The prevalence of serum HBV DNA, detected by polymerase chain reaction, and that of immunoserologic HBV markers (HBsAg, HBeAg, anti-HBs, and anti-HBc), determined by immunoassays, were compared among three groups of subjects: (A) chronic active hepatitis B patients, (B) chronic asymptomatic HBV carriers, and (C) normal individuals. Except five of the normal individuals, all of the subjects are positive for anti-HBc while some of them were also positive for other immunoserologic HBV markers, such as anti-HBs, HBsAg, and HBeAg. Serum HBV DNA were detected in 81% in group A, 52% in group B, and 20% in group C. In both group A and B, serum HBV DNA were detected in all the subjects with anti-HBc+/HBsAg+/HBeAg+. However, the percentage of seropositive HBV DNA in the subjects with anti-HBc+/HBsAg+ in Group A was much higher than that in Group B. Interestingly, the percent of serum HBV DNA+ in the individuals with anti-HBc+ only was markedly higher than that in the subjects with anti-HBc+/anti-HBs+ in both Group A and C, suggesting that anti-HBs may play a role in the inhibition of HBV replication and clearance of HBV virion from blood. Above serological profiles will provide important information concerning the significance of serum HBV DNA detection in judgement of HBV replication in the individuals with or without HBV infection. Cautions should be taken to clarify those so called normal individuals who have no symptoms of hepatitis B, no HBsAg in the sera and normal transaminase, but have HBV replication in their bodies.

China↗

PubMed2001

[Clinical study on the relationships between HBV C gene promotor gene mutation and immunological marker, HBV DNA concentration].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationships between HBV infected patients immunological marker, HBV DNA concentration, and clinical symptoms. METHODS: PCR-microplate nucleotide acid hybridization-ELISA and FQ-PCR methods were applied in the analysis of HBV BCP gene mutation and HBV DNA concentration in 246 HBV infected patients. RESULTS: In patients with HBsAg+/HBeAg+/anti-HBc+, HBsAg+/anti-HBeAb+/anti-HBcAb+, and HBsAg+/anti-HBc+, the HBV DNA positive rate were 97.9% (48/49), 22.9% (25/109), 31.1% (14/45) respectively, with the overall positive rate 42.85% (98/203). And the HBV BCP gene mutation rate were 59.1% (29/49), 11% (12/109), 13.3% (6/45) respectively, with the overall mutation rate 23.15% (47/203). In HBV BCP gene mutation group HBV DNA concentration of each specimen was more than 10(6) cps/ml, which are significantly higher than other groups(P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Re-evaluation of HBV infected patients with HBsAg+/anti-HBe+/anti-HBc+ and HBV BCP gene mutation is necessary. The immunological turnover of HBeAg indicates the immune clearance and rest of HBV only in part of HBV infected patients. The immunological marker should not be the sole factor upon which the HBV replication status, the diagnosis and prognosis of patients are determined.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2004

[Investigation on the alteration of hepatitis B virus (HBV) markers in liver allograft of HBV related recipients in perioperative period].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the alteration of HBV markers in liver allograft of HBV related recipients pre and post liver transplantation under Lamivudine or combination of Lamivudine with HBIG prophylaxis and explore the mechanism of HBV de nova infection in liver allograft after orthotopic liver transplantation, as well as seek to establish a optimal prophylactic protocol. METHODS: The serial liver biopsy specimens of 90 liver allograft and sera of 78 liver transplant recipients during operation and after 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, 24 months post transplantation have been collected and detected for HBV markers with enzyme-linked radioimmunoassay, fluorescent quantitative assay for HBV-DNA in serology and with immunohistochemistry stain, HBV-DNA in situ hybridization in histology for detection of HBV markers in liver allograft samples. RESULTS: Whether recipients with active replicative or inactive replicative HBV preoperatively, none of positive HBV-DNA, HBsAg and HBcAg in 100% liver biopsy specimens with HBV-DNA hybridization in situ and immunohistochemistry stains in histology within 2 hours after reperfusion. CONCLUSION: Whatever HBV replicative status the recipients have before surgery, no evidence of HBV particles direct invasion to the liver allograft from HBV related cirrhotics during operation under current prophylactic measures. However, the further supposed mechanism and its significance in HBV de nova infection of liver allograft remained to be disclosed further.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2005

Re-analysis of a human hepatitis B virus (HBV) isolate from an East African wild born Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii: evidence for interspecies recombination between HBV infecting chimpanzee and human.

According to current estimates, hepatitis B virus (HBV) has infected 2 billion people worldwide and among them, 360 million suffer from chronic HBV infection. Except humans, HBV or HBV-like viruses have also been isolated from different species of apes and mammals. Although recombination has been described to occur extensively between different genotypes within the human HBV lineage, no recombination event has ever been reported between human and non-human primate HBV sequences. It was our objective to perform an exhaustive search for recombination between human and non-human primate HBV strains among all available full-length human and non-human primate HBV sequences, using bootscanning and phylogenetic analyses. Intriguingly, we found that an HBV sequence isolated from a wild born Pan troglodytes schweinfurthii in East Africa-FG-is a recombinant consisting of HBV infecting chimpanzee (ChHBV) and human genotype C. More specifically, in a fragment of approximately 500 nt (positions 551-1050 spanning half of the RT domain of pol, which overlaps with half of the coding region of the small surface protein), FG grouped with HBV genotype C, while in the rest of the genome it grouped with ChHBV sequences. Phylogenetic analyses showed that in the latter region FG was more closely related to the Pan troglodytes troglodytes subspecies, forming an outlier to this group. Moreover, we show evidence that the recombination event occurred after the initial dispersion of HBV genotype C in humans. Finally, our findings point out that although rare recombination between HBV viruses infecting different species occurs.

Africa, Eastern↗