SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Histones”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1976

Histone dimers: a fundamental unit in histone assembly.

Histone interactions which occur, at moderate ionic strengths, when several types of purified, renatured histones are mixed at equimolar ratios have been studied. The four histones H2A,H2B,H3 and H4 complex and form dimers. Histone H1 does not interact with the other four histone types and does not form dimers. Mixing of single histone species with preformed histone pairs as well as mixing of two different types of histone pairs, leads to exchange of histones among the pairs and formation of dimers. No trimers are formed. The dimers are in equilibrium with high-molecular weight histone structures. The results indicate that histone dimers may serve as a stable intermediate in histone assembly. Because each histone type (except H1) can interact with itself as well as with each of the other three histone types we suggest that each histone type should be considered as an interchangeable subunit of a multichain protein in which the dimer species is the most stable structure.

Animals↗

PubMed1987

Autogenous regulation of histone mRNA decay by histone proteins in a cell-free system.

We tested the hypothesis that histone mRNA turnover is accelerated in the presence of free histone proteins. In an in vitro mRNA decay system, histone mRNA was degraded four- to sixfold faster in reaction mixtures containing core histones and a cytoplasmic S130 fraction than in reaction mixtures lacking these components. The decay rate did not change significantly when histones or S130 was added separately, suggesting either that the histones were modified and thereby activated by S130 or that additional factors besides histones were required. RecA, SSB (single-stranded binding), and histone proteins all formed complexes with histone mRNA, but only histones induced accelerated histone mRNA turnover. Therefore, the effect was not the result of random RNA-protein interactions. Moreover, histone proteins did not induce increased degradation of gamma globin mRNA, c-myc mRNA, or total poly(A)- or poly(A)+ polysomal mRNAs. This autoregulatory mechanism is consistent with the observed accumulation of cytoplasmic histone proteins in cells after DNA synthesis stops, and it can account, in part, for the rapid disappearance of histone mRNA at the end of S phase.

Cell-Free System↗

PubMed1975

Histone methylation. Its occurrence in different cell types and relation to histone H4 metabolism in developing trout testis.

Histone methylation in developing trout testis has been observed in the diploid stem cells and primary spermatocytes, which actively synthesize DNA and histones. In spermatids, histone methylation is minimal and so probably plays no role in the replacement of histones by protamine which is characteristic of this cell type. No turnover of histone methyl groups could be detected over several hours, so that unlike acetylation or phosphorylation of histones, methylation in this tissue appears to be a stable, irreversible modification. When histone H4, labeled with [14C]methyl groups, is separated on starch gels into acetylated and phosphorylated derivatives, [14C]methyl label does not appear in positions characteristic of newly synthesized histone H4, i.e. the highly acetylated (di-, tri-, and tetra-acetylated), unphosphorylated species. [14C]Methyl label appears rather in the unphosphorylated, and unacetylated or monoacetylated species, shifting with time to the monophosphorylated form of histone H4. These data suggest a temporal sequence of events for histone H4: synthesis, then acetylation and deacetylation, followed by methylation and phosphorylation. Occurring late after histone synthesis and assembly into chromatin, histone methylation might then be necessary for histone interactions with other molecules (e.g. histone phosphokinase) prior to mitosis.

Animals↗

PubMed1979

The use of DNA-cellulose for analyzing histone-DNA interactions. Discovery of nucleosome-like histone binding to single-stranded DNA.

In this report, we introduce the use of DNA-cellulose chromatography for evaluating the strength of binding of histones to DNA under a variety of conditions. We have found that histones added directly to DNA-cellulose at physiological salt concentrations bind relatively weakly, with all histones eluting together at about 0.5 M NaCl when a salt gradient is applied. However, much tighter binding of the four nucleosomal histones to DNA-cellulose is obtained if gradual histone-DNA reconstitution conditions are used. In this case, the binding of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4 to DNA-cellulose closely resembles their binding to native chromatin. The nativeness of the binding is indicated both by the distinctive sodium chloride elution profile of these histones from DNA-cellulose and by their relative resistance to trypsin digestion when DNA-bound. The binding to DNA-cellulose of histones H2A, H2B, H3, and H4, which have had the first 20 to 30 amino acid residues removed from their NH2 termini, is indistinguishable from the binding to DNA-cellulose of the same intact histones, as judged by their salt elution profile. Thus, even though the NH2 termini contain 40 to 50% of the positively charged amino acid residues (thought to interact with the DNA backbone), a major contribution to the DNA binding comes from the remainder of the histone molecule. Finally, we have discovered that histones can form a "nucleosome-like" complex on single-stranded DNA. The same complex does not appear to form on RNA. Histones H3 and H4 play a predominant role in organizing this histone complex on single-stranded DNA, as they do on double-stranded DNA in normal nucleosomes. We suggest that, in the cell nucleus, nucleosomal structures may form transiently on single strands of DNA, as DNA and RNA polymerases traverse DNA packaged by histones.

Animals↗

PubMed1991

Immunogenicity of free histones and of histones complexed with RNA.

Histone antibodies have been obtained by immunizing rabbits with histones H1, H2A, H2B, H3, H4 and triacetylated H4, uncomplexed to RNA. The reactivity of these antibodies was investigated by ELISA using as antigen isolated histones and chromatin as well as thirty-five different synthetic peptides covering the entire sequence of the four core histones, two peptides of H1 and two acetylated peptides of H4. The binding of these antibodies to histones was also measured in immunoblotting and in microcomplement fixation (MCF) tests. In parallel experiments using the same assays the various antigens were tested with antisera raised against histones complexed with RNA. Antibodies induced in the absence of RNA did not react with histones in MCF tests nor with chromatin in ELISA but reacted with the histones in ELISA, although the antibody titers were somewhat lower than in the case of antisera to histone-RNA complexes. Antibodies to RNA-histone complexes reacted with histones in both ELISA and MCF tests. When they were tested with peptide-coated microtiter plates in a direct binding ELISA format, antibodies induced with uncomplexed histones recognized very few fragments which were mainly located in the N- and C-terminal ends of the histones.

Acetylation↗

PubMed1976

Effect of histones and nonhistone chromosomal proteins on the transcription of histone genes from HeLaS3 cell DNA.

To elucidate the manner in which histones and nonhistone chromosomal proteins interact to render histone genes transcribable in HeLa S3 cells, we have examined transcription of histone mRNA sequences from DNA, as well as from several DNA-chromosomal protein complexes. Histone mRNA sequences were assayed by hybridization to a 3H-labeled single-stranded DNA complementary to histone mRNAs. Our results indicate that DNA is an effective template for transcription of histone mRNA sequences and that histones by themselves inhibit transcription from DNA, including transcription of histone genes, in a dose-dependent, nonspecific manner. When complexed with DNA alone, nonhistone chromosomal proteins do not affect the transcription of histone mRNA sequences. However, when associated with DNA in the presence of histones, nonhistone chromosomal proteins are capable of selectively rendering histone genes transcribable. These results suggest a possible role for nonhistone chromosomal proteins in mediating the interactions of histones with DNA to render histone genes transcribable.

Base Sequence↗

PubMed1974

Non-histone chromosomal proteins. Evidence for their role in mediating the binding of histones to deoxyribonucleic acid during the cell cycle.

By selective dissociation of histones with the ionic detergent sodium deoxycholate, we have demonstrated that these basic chromosomal polypeptides, which are effective inhibitors of transcription, are more tenaciously bound to DNA in mitotic than in S-phase chromatin. Evidence is presented which suggests that cell-cycle-stage-specific non-histone chromosomal proteins can account for such variations in the association of histones with DNA. When chromatin is reconstituted with DNA and histones are pooled from S-phase and mitotic cells and either S-phase or mitotic non-histone chromosomal proteins, a preferential extraction of histones with sodium deoxycholate from chromatin reconstituted with S-phase rather than mitotic non-histone chromosomal proteins is observed. In contrast, the extractability of histones with sodium deoxycholate from nucleohistone complexes reconstituted with DNA pooled from S-phase and mitotic cells and either S-phase or mitotic histones is identical. Since non-histone chromosomal proteins rather than histones are responsible for the differences in chromatin template activity during S-phase and mitosis, we propose that non-histone chromosomal proteins may modify gene expression during the cell cycle by mediating the binding of histones to DNA.

Binding Sites↗

PubMed1975

The histones of rainbow trout erythrocytes include an erythrocyte-specific histone.

The erythrocyte histones of rainbow trout were compared with those of goose by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. A band analogous to goose erythrocyte-specific histone V, but not identical in relative mobility or quantity, was found to be a component of trout erythrocyte histone. A similar component was also found in carp erythrocyte histone, but it was absent from trout liver histone. To reveal this band clearly, it was advantageous to displace the histone III monomer by oxidation. To verify the character of this protein, each of the main erythrocyte histones of trout were purified by chromatography on Amberlite CG-50, eluted with guanidinium chloride, and then further purified by exclusion chromatography on Bio-Gel P-60. Amino acid compositions of corresponding trout and goose histones, including that of the erythrocyte-specific histone, were sufficiently similar to establish their analogous identities. In general, the chromatographic and electrophoretic properties of histones I, IIb1, IIb2, and V from trout differed more from those of goose, than did their gross amino acid compositions. Comprehensive fractionation and characterization is necessary to extablish identities of corresponding histone fractions, An extensive quantitative variability was found among erythrocyte-specific histones of fish. This must be reconciled with hypothetical roles for this histone in erythropoiesis.

Amino Acids↗

PubMed1977

Non-histone chromosomal proteins: their role in the regulation of histone-gene expression.

Histone-gene expression was studied during the cell cycle of continuously dividing HeLa S3 cells and after stimulation of confluent monolayers of WI-38 human diploid fibroblasts to proliferate. The presence of histone-mRNA sequences was assayed by hybridization to a 3H-labelled single-stranded DNA complementary to histone-mRNA molecules. In HeLa S3 cells histone mRNA sequences were found in the nucleus and associated with polyribosomes during S-phase, but not during G1-phase. Transcripts of S-phase chromatin contained histone-mRNA sequences, but those of G1-phase chromatin did not. Similarly, in WI-38 cells association of histone-mRNA sequences with polyribosomes and transcription of histone-mRNA sequences from chromatin parallel DNA replication. Taken together these results suggest that the regulation of histone-gene expression resides, at least in part, at the transcriptional level. Chromatin-reconstitution studies provide evidence that non-histone chromosomal proteins play a key role in activation of histone-gene transcription during the period of the cell cycle when DNA is replicated. Phosphate groups associated with the S-phase non-histone chromosomal proteins appear to be functionally involved in the control of histone-gene readout.

Animals↗

PubMed1989

Nucleotide sequences of Caenorhabditis elegans core histone genes. Genes for different histone classes share common flanking sequence elements.

We have determined the nucleotide sequence of core histone genes and flanking regions from two of approximately 11 different genomic histone clusters of the nematode Caenorhabditis elegans. Four histone genes from one cluster (H3, H4, H2B, H2A) and two histone genes from another (H4 and H2A) were analyzed. The predicted amino acid sequences of the two H4 and H2A proteins from the two clusters are identical, whereas the nucleotide sequences of the genes have diverged 9% (H2A) and 12% (H4). Flanking sequences, which are mostly not similar, were compared to identify putative regulatory elements. A conserved sequence of 34 base-pairs is present 19 to 42 nucleotides 3' of the termination codon of all the genes. Within the conserved sequence is a 16-base dyad sequence homologous to the one typically found at the 3' end of histone genes from higher eukaryotes. The C. elegans core histone genes are organized as divergently transcribed pairs of H3-H4 and H2A-H2B and contain 5' conserved sequence elements in the shared spacer regions. One of the sequence elements, 5' CTCCNCCTNCCCACCNCANA 3', is located immediately upstream from the canonical TATA homology of each gene. Another sequence element, 5' CTGCGGGGACACATNT 3', is present in the spacer of each heterotypic pair. These two 5' conserved sequences are not present in the promoter region of histone genes from other organisms, where 5' conserved sequences are usually different for each histone class. They are also not found in non-histone genes of C. elegans. These putative regulatory sequences of C. elegans core histone genes are similar to the regulatory elements of both higher and lower eukaryotes. The coding regions of the genes and the 3' regulatory sequences are similar to those of higher eukaryotes, whereas the presence of common 5' sequence elements upstream from genes of different histone classes is similar to histone promoter elements in yeast.

Animals↗

PubMed1976

Histone genes of the sea urchin (S. purpuratus) cloned in E coli: order, polarity, and strandedness of the five histone-coding and spacer regions.

Sea urchin (S. purpuratus) histone DNA of constructed plasmid chimeras cloned in E. coli was cleaved with the restriction endonucleases Eco RI, Hind III, Sal I. Bam I, and Hha I. The resulting fragments were ordered and isolated directly from agarose gels or cloned into other plasmids. Each fragment hybridized to one or another of the five histone mRNAs and elucidated the order of the histone genes in each of the cloned fragments. Some DNA did not hybridize to histone mRNAs and was identified as spacer DNA located between coding regions. Total sea urchin DNA was cleaved with restriction endonucleases, fractionated on agarose gels, and hybridized to histone mRNAs or histone DNA. The results revealed the order of the five histone genes in the histone gene repeat unit and demonstrate that the histone spacer DNA have little sequence homology to other genes. ExonucleaseIII digestion of specific linear chimeric histone DNA plasmids followed by hybridization with mRNAs demonstrated the existence of all five histone genes on one strand of DNA and the 5'-3' polarity of that strand. These results, in conjunction with the data of Wu et al. (1976), allow us to construct a map of coding and spacer sequences in the transcribed strand of S. purpuratus histone gene repeat unit: (see article).

Animals↗

PubMed1985

Amino acid sequence of histone H1 at the ADP-ribose-accepting site and ADP-ribose X histone-H1 adduct as an inhibitor of cyclic-AMP-dependent phosphorylation.

The ADP-ribosylation site of histone H1 from calf thymus by purified hen liver nuclear ADP-ribosyltransferase was determined and effects of the ADP-ribose X histone-H1 adduct on cAMP-dependent phosphorylation of the histone H1 were investigated. ADP-ribosylated histone H1 was prepared by incubation of histone H1, 1 mM [adenylate-32P]NAD and the purified ADP-ribosyltransferase. N-Bromosuccinimide-directed bisection of ADP-ribosylated histone H1 showed that the NH2-terminal fragment (Mr = 6000) was modified and contained serine residue 38, the site of phosphorylation by cAMP-dependent protein kinase. Digestion of the NH2-terminal fragment with cathepsin D and trypsin, and purification of this fragment, using high-performance liquid chromatography, yielded a radiolabelled single peptide corresponding to residues 29-34 of histone H1, containing the arginine residue as the ADP-ribosylation site. These results indicate that ADP-ribosylation of histone H1 occurs at the arginine residue 34, sequenced at the NH2-terminal side of the phosphate-accepting serine residue 38. Phosphorylation of histone H1 from calf thymus by cAMP-dependent protein kinase was markedly reduced when histone H1 was ADP-ribosylated. Kinetic studies of phosphorylation revealed that ADP-ribosylated histone H1 was a linear competitive inhibitor of histone H1 and a linear non-competitive inhibitor of ATP.

Adenosine Diphosphate Ribose↗

PubMed1991

Histone acetylation in Zea mays. II. Biological significance of post-translational histone acetylation during embryo germination.

Multiple forms of histone acetyltransferases and histone deacetylases, which have been separated and characterized in the accompanying manuscript (López-Rodas, G., Georgieva, E. I., Sendra, R., and Loidl, P. (1991) J. Biol. Chem. 266, 18745-18750), together with in vivo acetate incorporation, were studied during the germination of Zea mays embryos. Total histone acetyltransferase activity increases during germination with two maxima at 40 and 72 h after start of germination. This fluctuation is mainly due to the cytoplasmic B-enzyme which predominantly acetylates histone H4 up to the diacetylated form. The nuclear histone acetyltransferase A2, specific for H3, is low throughout germination, except at 24 h, when it transiently becomes the main activity. Both enzymes are also present in the dry embryo, whereas the second nuclear enzyme A1, specific for H3 and H4, is absent in the initial stage of differentiation. The two histone deacetylases, HD1 and HD2, exhibit entirely different patterns. Whereas HD1 activity is low in the dry embryo and increases during germination, HD2 is the predominant enzyme at the start of differentiation, but almost disappears at later stages. Analysis of the in vivo acetate incorporation reveals that H4 is present in up to tetraacetylated subspecies. The pattern of acetate incorporation into core histones closely resembles the fluctuations of histone acetyltransferase B. Based on the analysis of thymidine kinase activity a close correlation was established between histone acetyltransferase B and DNA replication, whereas the A2 enzyme is associated with transcriptional activity. Histone deacetylase HD1 obviously serves a specific function in the dry embryo and could be a prerequisite for DNA repair processes. The study confirms the idea of DNA repair processes. The study confirms the idea of multiple functions of histone acetylation and assigns distinct enzymes, involved in this modification, to certain nuclear processes.

Acetylation↗

PubMed1976

A study of histone-histone interactions by affinity chromatography.

Homologous whole histone from calf thymus was adsorbed on Sepharose 4B columns with covalently coupled histone fractions H2a, H2b, H3 or H4 in 0.01 M phosphate buffer, pH 6.7 - 1 M NaCl. The adsorbed histones were eluted from the columns with 5 M urea in the same buffer. Electrophoretic analysis has shown that the different columns exhibit selective affinity to the histone fractions: the H2b column to histone H2b and H2a (with only weak affinity to histones H3 and H4), the H2a column to histones H2b and H3 (moderate affinity to histone H2b), and the H4 column to histone H3, H4 and H2b (weak affinity to histone H2a). Histone H1 displayed no fixation by either of the columns tested.

Chemical Phenomena↗

PubMed1985

Separation of histones by reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography: analysis of the binding of carcinogens to histones.

Reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) has been examined as an approach to the rapid analysis of carcinogen-modified histones. H1 and core histone fractions were prepared by differential acid extraction of 0.35 M NaCl-extracted rat liver nuclei previously exposed to [3H]-7r,8t-dihydroxy-9t, 10t-oxy-7,8,9, 10-tetrahydrobenzo(a)pyrene [( 3H]BPDE-I). Using a sodium perchlorate-phosphate (PCP)/acetonitrile solvent system, the H1 histone fraction was eluted from an Aquapore RP-300 column in five peaks (P1-P5). The core histone fraction was resolved into eight peaks (C1-C8) using a PCP/acetonitrile-methanol solvent system. The histones of each peak were identified by sodium dodecyl sulfate and Triton/acid/urea gel electrophoresis or amino acid analysis as follows: P1, H1 degrees; P2-P5, four different H1 variant fractions; C1, H4 + A24; C2, H2B; C3, H2A X 2 + to one H2A variant; C4, H2A.1; C5, H2A.1 + two H2A variants; C6, H3.2; C7, H3.3; C8, H3.1. The bulk of radioactivity was covalently bound to histone H2A, which had higher specific activities of BPDE-I than other histones. Significant amounts of radioactivity were observed in histones H3 and H1, but not in histones H2B and H4. These RP-HPLC systems have the advantages of an analysis time within 60 min, the identification of H1, H2A, and H3 variants, and the quantitative analysis of radioactive histones. These results indicate that these RP-HPLC systems are very useful to analyze the binding of carcinogens to histones.

7,8-Dihydro-7,8-dihydroxybenzo(a)pyrene 9,10-oxide↗

PubMed1987

Changes in the histone H2A variant H2A.Z and polyubiquitinated histone species in developing trout testis.

The trout histone H2A variant H2A.Z has been identified by its electrophoretic mobility on two-dimensional polyacrylamide gels and its N-terminal amino acid sequence. Similar to bovine H2A.Z and chicken H2A.F (also called H2A.Z and M1), the trout H2A.Z had a two-residue extension when aligned with trout H2A and a 67% sequence homology with the N-terminal portion of trout H2A. The first 29 amino acids of trout H2A.Z were identical with those of chicken H2A.F and differed from those of bovine H2A.Z at only one position. Thus, the N-terminal part of histone H2A.Z appears to be highly conserved. The levels of histone H2A.Z and ubiquitinated species of the histones H2A, H2A.Z, and H2B, which were detected with an anti-ubiquitin antibody, were studied at various stages of trout testis development. At the final stages of spermatogenesis in trout, histones are replaced by protamines. Ubiquitinated and diubiquitinated histone H2A remained at similar levels in early and late stage testis nucleohistone. In the late stage testis chromatin (nucleohistone), ubiquitinated histone H2A.Z was not detected, the level of ubiquitinated histone H2B was reduced, and the amount of diubiquitinated histone H2B increased. There was also a marked reduction in the level of histone H2A.Z. This observation suggests nucleosomes with this histone variant were selectively disassembled during the transition from nucleohistone to nucleoprotamine, indicating that protamine deposition is not a random process in rainbow trout.

Aging↗

PubMed1987

Regulation of human histone gene expression: transcriptional and posttranscriptional control in the coupling of histone messenger RNA stability with DNA replication.

The extent to which transcriptional and posttranscriptional regulation contributes to the coupling of histone gene expression and DNA replication was examined during the cell cycle in synchronized HeLa S3 cells. Rates of transcription were determined in vitro in isolated nuclei. A 3-5-fold increase in cell cycle dependent histone gene transcription was observed in early S phase, prior to the peak of DNA synthesis. This result is consistent with a previous determination of histone mRNA synthesis in intact cells [Plumb, M., Stein, J., & Stein, G. (1983) Nucleic Acids Res. 11, 2391]. The transcription of these genes did not change appreciably after inhibition of DNA replication by hydroxyurea treatment, although Northern blot analysis indicated that cellular levels of histone mRNA decreased rapidly in the presence of the drug. Total cellular levels of histone mRNA closely parallel the rate of DNA synthesis as a function of cell cycle progression, reaching a maximal 20-fold increase as compared with non S phase levels. This DNA synthesis dependent accumulation of histone mRNA occurs predominantly in the cytoplasm and appears to be mediated primarily by control of histone mRNA stability. Changes in nuclear histone mRNA levels were less pronounced. These combined observations suggest that both transcriptional regulation and posttranscriptional regulation contribute toward control of the cell cycle dependent accumulation of histone mRNA during S phase, while the stability of histone mRNA throughout S phase and the selective turnover of histone mRNAs, either at the natural termination of S phase or following inhibition of DNA synthesis, are posttranscriptionally regulated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cell Nucleus↗

PubMed1988

Kinetics of accumulation and depletion of soluble newly synthesized histone in the reciprocal regulation of histone and DNA synthesis.

Procedures are presented which permit the identification and analysis of cellular histone that is not bound to chromatin. This histone, called soluble histone, could be distinguished from that bound to chromatin by the state of H4 modification and the lack of H2A ubiquitination. Changes in the levels of newly synthesized soluble histone were analyzed with respect to the balance between histone and DNA synthesis in hamster ovary cells. Pulse-chase protocols suggested that the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction into chromatin may have two kinetic components with half-depletion times of about 1 and 40 min. When protein synthesis was inhibited, the pulse-chase kinetics of newly synthesized histone from the solubl fraction into chromatin were not significantly altered from those of the control. However, in contrast to the control, when protein synthesis was inhibited, DNA synthesis was also inhibited with kinetics similar to those of the chase of newly synthesized histone from the soluble fraction. There was a rapid decrease in the rate of DNA synthesis with a half-deceleration time of 1 min down to about 30% of the control rate, followed by a slower decrease with an approximate half-deceleration time of 40 min. When DNA synthesis was inhibited, newly synthesized histone accumulated in the soluble fraction, but H2A and H2B continued to complex with chromatin at a significant rate. Soluble histone in G1 cells showed the same differential partitioning of H4/H3 and H2A/H2B between the soluble and chromatin-bound fractions as was found in cycling cells with inhibited DNA synthesis. These results support a unified model of reciprocal regulatory mechanisms between histone and DNA synthesis in the assembly of chromatin.

Animals↗