PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “ICU”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed2006

Use of computerized ICU documentation to capture ICU core measures.

BACKGROUND: Intensive care unit (ICU) core measures that target the prevention of catheter-related bloodstream infections (CRBSIs) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) in ventilated ICU patients are underway across the United States. Implementation often requires additional personnel to educate providers and collect the data. We hypothesized that use of our current computerized ICU flowsheet could provide timely, accurate data on ICU core measures without additional personnel dedicated to data capture. METHODS: In a 10-bed, closed surgical ICU with existing protocols for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis, stress ulcer bleeding prophylaxis (SUP), ventilator weaning parameters, and glucose control, we created a reporting tool that would document daily weaning parameters, head of bed (HOB) at 30 degrees , glucose levels, DVT prophylaxis, and SUP. Our glucose protocol targeted <150 mg/dL, with all daily glucose values reported rather than just the morning value. The results from the previous 12 am to 11:59 pm were available to the rounding team at 7 am. We examined compliance at the start and after education of medical staff (March/April for HOB up, DVT, and SUP; May/June for glucose control). RESULTS: During 2005, compliance with all protocols improved. Percent compliance for DVT prophylaxis, SUP, and HOB up rose from as low as 32% at the start of the documentation process to consistently higher than the target level of 95%. Compliance for glucose control increased after intensive education of nursing and physicians with the mean glucose falling from 144 to 122 mg/dL. There was increased nursing workload for checking glucose levels in which the mean number of glucose checks rose from a low of 1.5 per patient to as high as 8.2 per patient per day. CRBSI and VAP rates did not decrease during this period compared with the prior year. Length of stay and mortality were unchanged. CONCLUSIONS: Reporting of ICU core measures to treating staff can be done accurately and promptly with a computerized system. Education was effective in improving compliance levels. No additional personnel were required to create reports, capture data, or improve compliance after initial development and testing. Although compliance with core measures met target levels at the end of the year, we did not observe improved outcomes in terms of CRBSI, VAP, mortality, or length of stay.

APACHE↗
PubMed1992

Comparison of APACHE II, TRISS, and a proposed 24-hour ICU point system for prediction of outcome in ICU trauma patients.

The APACHE II system for predicting outcomes in critically ill patients is now being used to evaluate quality of care for patients in surgical intensive care units, including trauma patients. The trauma data, however, on which the APACHE outcomes are based, were derived from only 364 ICU trauma patients. We compared the outcome predictions by APACHE II, TRISS, and a proposed 24-hour ICU point system in 1,000 ICU patients. [table: see text] p less than 0.025 by unpaired t test for predictive power of ICU point system versus APACHE II. Values of more than 15.5 represent poor agreement between the outcomes estimated from the model and the observed outcomes; a low value represents good agreement. The APACHE system significantly overestimated the risk of death in the lower ranges of predicted risk and underestimated the deaths in the higher ranges. Although TRISS was not developed for ICU trauma patients, it tended to perform better than APACHE II in our sample. The 24-hour ICU point system performed well, with accurate agreement between the outcomes estimated from the model and the observed outcomes.

False Positive Reactions↗
PubMed2006

Preoperative information for ICU patients to reduce anxiety during and after the ICU-stay: protocol of a randomized controlled trial [NCT00151554].

BACKGROUND: According to current evidence and psychological theorizing proper information giving seems to be a promising way to reduce patient anxiety. In the case of surgical patients, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) is strongly associated with uncertainty, unpredictability and anxiety for the patient. Thus, ICU specific information could have a high clinical impact. This study investigates the potential benefits of a specifically designed ICU-related information program for patients who undergo elective cardiac, abdominal or thoracic surgery and are scheduled for ICU stay. METHODS/DESIGN: The trial is designed as a prospective randomized controlled trial including an intervention and a control group. The control group receives the standard preparation currently conducted by surgeons and anesthetists. The intervention group additionally receives a standardized information program with specific procedural, sensory and coping information about the ICU.A measurable clinical relevant difference regarding anxiety will be expected after discharge from ICU. Power calculation (alpha = 0.05; beta = 0.20; Delta = 8.50 score points) resulted in a required sample size of N = 120 cardiac surgical patients (n = 60 vs. n = 60). Furthermore, N = 20 abdominal or thoracic surgical patients will be recruited (n = 10 vs. n = 10) to gain insight to a possible generalization to other patient groups. Additionally the moderating effect of specific patient attributes (need for cognition, high trait anxiety) will be investigated to identify certain patient groups which benefit most. DISCUSSION: The proposed study promises to strengthen evidence on effects of a specific, concise information program that addresses the information needs of patients scheduled for ICU stay.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1996

ICU scoring systems allow prediction of patient outcomes and comparison of ICU performance.

Too much time and effort are wasted in attempts to pass final judgment on whether systems for ICU prognostication are "good or bad" and whether they "do or do not" provide a simple answer to the complex and often unpredictable question of individual mortality in the ICU. A substantial amount of data supports the usefulness of general ICU prognostic systems in comparing ICU performance with respect to a wide variety of endpoints, including ICU and hospital mortality, duration of stay, and efficiency of resource use. Work in progress is analyzing both general resource use and specific therapeutic interventions. It also is time to fully acknowledge that statistics never can predict whether a patient will die with 100% accuracy. There always will be exceptions to the rule, and physicians frequently will have information that is not included in prognostic models. In addition, the values of both physicians and patients frequently lead to differences in how a probability in interpreted; for some, a 95% probability estimate means that death is near and, for others, this estimate represents a tangible 5% chance for survival. This means that physicians must learn how to integrate such estimates into their medical decisions. In doing so, it is our hope that prognostic systems are not viewed as oversimplifying or automating clinical decisions. Rather, such systems provide objective data on which physicians may ground a spectrum of decisions regarding either escalation or withdrawal of therapy in critically ill patients. These systems do not dehumanize our decision-making process but, rather, help eliminate physician reliance on emotional, heuristic, poorly calibrated, or overly pessimistic subjective estimates. No decision regarding patient care can be considered best if the facts upon which it is based on imprecise or biased. Future research will improve the accuracy of individual patient predictions but, even with the highest degree of precision, such predictions are useful only in support of, and not as a substitute for, good clinical judgment.

Bias↗
PubMed1995

Computerized ICU Orders Versus Handwritten ICU Orders: A Prospective, Pharmacy-Based Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare computerized ICU order writing with handwritten ICU physician orders. DESIGN: Prospective study. SETTING: Medical and surgical Intensive Care Units and pharmacy of a Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center. PATIENTS: Two hundred sixty-four individual sets of orders. INTERVENTIONS: A time study and problem analysis were performed in the pharmacy as orders were received and processed. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred sixty-four sets of orders were evaluated; MICU (handwritten; n = 133) and SICU (computerized; n = 131). Physician length of training are similar in both units. The patient age and number of major diagnoses per patient in the two ICU groups were similar. Significantly less time (min) (MICU 2.5 ± 0.3 versus SICU 1.84 ± 0.1, p < 0.05) is required to review SICU orders. The SICU had significantly fewer order problems (MICU 45 versus SICU 12, p < 0.05). Computerized SICU orders were corrected more rapidly. The majority of order problems in both groups were resolved by telephone. CONCLUSIONS: ICU orders by computer program are processed more rapidly, have fewer errors, and are corrected more rapidly than standard handwritten orders. We conclude that a dedicated ICU computerized order-writing system permits orders to be written with fewer errors and the pharmacy to process them more efficiently than handwritten orders.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2005

Recognition of delirium in ICU patients: a diagnostic study of the NEECHAM confusion scale in ICU patients.

BACKGROUND: A delirium, is a serious, high-frequency complication in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. The consequences of this complication range from high morbidity and mortality to greater need for nursing care. Despite these, delirium is often not recognized and there for not treated. In this study a nursing screening instrument, the NEECHAM confusion scale, was studied for early recognition of delirium ICU patients. This scale proved valid and reliable in several studies in the general hospital population. METHODS: In this study validity and reliability were tested in a prospective cohort of 105 patients. Gold standard for delirium was an independent DSM-IV diagnosis. User friendliness was tested by structured evaluation of nurses' experiences working with the scale. RESULTS: The NEECHAM confusion scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.88) and an interrater reliability of Cohen's Kappa 0.60. The concurrent validity with the DSM-IVcriteria showed a strong link (chi-square 67.52, p [less than or equal to] 0.001). Sensitivity was high, 97% and specificity was good 83%. ICU nurses completed the NEECHAM confusion rating in 3.69, +/- 1.21 minutes average. In general the nurses were positive about the NEECHAM confusion scale. They were able to collect data during regular care, but experienced problems in rating the scale in intubated patients. The items in themselves were clear, the content validity, measured by the language used was rated good. CONCLUSION: The psychometric characteristics of the NEECHAM confusion scale of this ICU study are generally consistent with validity research previously reported for the general hospital population. The psychometric characteristics and the ease of use of the NEECHAM confusion scale enables ICU nurses to early recognize delirium. Further study, especially in intubed patients is recommended.

Journal Article↗
PubMed2000

Clinical course, prognostic factors, and outcome prediction for HIV patients in the ICU. The PIP (Pulmonary complications, ICU support, and prognostic factors in hospitalized patients with HIV) study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical course and prognostic factors in patients with HIV admitted to the ICU. DESIGN: Prospective, observational. SETTING: A university-affiliated medical center. METHODS: : We included 169 consecutive ICU admissions, from April 1995 through March 1999, of 141 adults with HIV. Data collected included APACHE (acute physiology and chronic health evaluation) II score, CD4(+) lymphocyte count, serum albumin level, in-hospital mortality, and the development of organ failure, systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), and ARDS. RESULTS: The ICU admission rate of hospitalized patients with HIV infection was 12%. The most common reason for ICU admission was respiratory failure, occurring in 65 patient admissions. Mechanical ventilation was required in 91 admissions (54%), ARDS developed in 37 admissions (22%), Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia was diagnosed in 24 admissions (14%), and SIRS developed in 126 admissions (75%). One or more organ failures developed in 131 admissions (78%). The actual and predicted mortality rates were 29.6% and 45.2%, respectively, with a standardized mortality ratio of 0.65. The most frequent immediate cause of death was bacterial infection. The CD4(+) lymphocyte count (median, 27.5 cells/microL vs 59 cells/microL; p = 0.0310) and serum albumin level (median 2.2 g/dL vs 2.6 g/dL; p = 0.0355) of nonsurvivors were lower and the APACHE II score (median, 30 vs 21; p < 0.0001) was higher, compared to those of survivors. A higher APACHE II score (odds ratio [OR], 1.11; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.05 to 1.16) and a transfer from another hospital ward (OR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.20 to 7.68) were independently associated with increased mortality. The median number of organ failures that developed in survivors was one, compared to four in nonsurvivors (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: The outcome of HIV-infected patients admitted to the ICU has improved over the years. The CD4 count does not correlate with in-hospital mortality. Higher APACHE II scores and a transfer from another hospital ward are associated with a poor outcome.

APACHE↗
PubMed1991

Time oriented score system (TOSS): a method for direct and quantitative assessment of nursing workload for ICU patients. Italian Multicenter Group of ICU research (GIRTI).

A method for direct quantitation of nurses' workload required by ICU patients is described. Each nursing activity has been timed in 14 different ICUs participating in the multicentre study, and the results averaged. Nursing acts were grouped in different homology lists, complied according to operative similarities. Some lists include general nursing acts, which are common to all patients admitted to ICU, others include acts peculiar to different organ system abnormalities or acts ancillary to the general group, finally one list includes emergency or occasional acts which are not encountered in every patient. The TOSS is a simple and rapid method for ICU nurses' workload assessment, can be computed both at admission and during the stay in ICU, and can provide factual information on the nurse/patient ratio necessary in a specific environment. TOSS validation was conducted with a yearly prospective study collecting 2710 patients. TOSS values varied according to diagnosis, severity of illness (SAPS) and intensity of processes (TISS), and TOSS specificity was demonstrated by the possibility of selecting a wide combination of nurse/patient ratios from 1:4 to 1:1 not possible with TISS.

Adult↗
PubMed2005

Increased risk of bloodstream and urinary infections in intensive care unit (ICU) patients compared with patients fitting ICU admission criteria treated in regular wards.

Critically ill patients, eligible for admission into intensive care units (ICUs), are often hospitalized in other wards due to a lack of ICU beds. Differences in morbidity between patients managed in ICUs and elsewhere are unknown, specifically the morbidity related to hospital-acquired infection. Patients fitting ICU admission criteria were identified by screening five entire hospitals on four separate days. Hospital infections within a 30-day follow-up period were compared in ICU patients and in patients on other wards using Kaplan-Meier curves. Residual differences in the patients' case mix between ICUs and other wards were adjusted for utilizing multivariate Cox models. Of 13415 patients screened, 668 were critically ill. The overall infection rates (per 100 patient-days) were 1.2 for bloodstream infection (BSI) and 1.9 for urinary tract infection (UTI). The adjusted hazard ratios in ICU patients compared with patients on regular wards were 3.1 (P<0.001) for BSI and 2.5 (P<0.001) for UTI. This increased risk persisted even after adjusting for the disparity in the number of cultures sent from ICUs compared with ordinary wards. No interdepartmental differences were found in the rates of pneumonia, surgical wound infections and other infections. Minimizing the differences between characteristics of patients hospitalized in ICUs and in other wards, and controlling for the higher frequency of cultures sent from ICUs did not eliminate the increased risk of BSI and UTI associated with admission into ICUs.

Aged↗
PubMed1996

The validity of a nursing assessment and monitoring of signs and symptoms scale in ICU and non-ICU patients.

PURPOSE: This study examined the validity of medical-record-based nursing assessment and monitoring of signs and symptoms (nursing surveillance) in predicting patients who were admitted to ICUs and those admitted to non-ICUs. The association of this assessment and monitoring with differences in an intermediate patient outcome, instability at discharge, was also explored. Patients admitted to either setting with a diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, congestive heart failure, or pneumonia, were included in the study. METHOD: A secondary analysis was carried out using a subset of data originally collected for a quality-of-care study. Data from the medical records of 11,246 patients (52% female, 48% male) with a mean age of 76.4 years were used in the present study. RESULTS: ICU patients (n = 3969) were found to have a longer length of stay and to be sicker on admission than non-ICU patients (n = 7277). Overall, patients in the ICU received significantly higher nursing assessment and monitoring of signs and symptoms scores than non-ICU patients. Nursing assessment and monitoring of signs and symptoms scores were lower for patients discharged with greater instability for three of the four diseases (cerebrovascular accidents, congestive heart failure, and pneumonia).

Aged↗
PubMed2006

Control of an outbreak of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus colonization and infection in an intensive care unit (ICU) without closing the ICU or placing patients in isolation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the control of multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii-calcoaceticus (MDRABC) colonization and infection in an intensive care unit (ICU). SETTING: An 18-bed ICU in a large tertiary care teaching hospital in London. INTERVENTIONS: After recognition of the outbreak, a range of infection control measures were introduced over several months that were primarily aimed at reducing environmental contamination with the outbreak strain. Strategies included use of a closed tracheal suction system for all patients receiving mechanical ventilation, use of nebulized colistin for patients with evidence of mild to moderate ventilator-associated pneumonia, improved availability of alcohol for hand decontamination, and clearer designation of responsibilities and strategies for cleaning equipment and the environment in the proximity of patients colonized or infected with MDRABC. RESULTS: The outbreak lasted from June 2001 through November 2002 and involved 136 new cases of MDRABC infection or colonization. The number of newly diagnosed cases per month reached a maximum of 15 in February 2002, and the number of new cases slowly decreased over the next 9 months. CONCLUSION: This outbreak was controlled by emphasizing the control of environmental reservoirs and did not require recourse to ward closure or placement of affected patients in isolation.

Acinetobacter Infections↗
PubMed2006

[ICU performance: results of a French study involving 80,000 ICU stays].

OBJECTIVE: The Standard Mortality Ratio (SMR), comparing the observed in-hospital mortality to the predicted, may measure the intensive care units (ICU) performance. STUDY DESIGN: Multicentric retrospective national study. METHODS: A probability model using a severity score such SAPS II calculated the predicted mortality rate. A national French study has been undertaken to compare the SMR of ICUs and looked for explanation. RESULTS: One hundred six units, 34 were medical (32%), 18 surgical (17%) and 57 medical/surgical (51%) participated to the study. Forty-six ICUs (43%) were located in teaching hospitals. The SMR of the 87,099 stays was 0.84 (0.82-0.85). The SMR of ICUs varied from 0.41 to 1.55. Ten units had a SMR>0.85, which suggested a low performance. They had more stays for cardiovascular failures, as compared with others. The best units (SMR<0.82) had more stays for drug overdose. The SMR increased with the number of organ failures, from 0.47 with zero failure to 1.11 with 4 or more organ failures. The stays with cardiovascular failure, either unique or associated, had a higher SMR. The 7935 stays with a drug overdose had a SMR of 0.12 (0.10-0.14), which suggested a bad calibration of the model in theses cases. CONCLUSION: The case mix must be taken in account when comparing the ICUs performance by the mean of SMR, particularly when the units admitted a lot of drug overdoses.

Cardiovascular Diseases↗
PubMed1996

ICU scoring systems do not allow prediction of patient outcomes or comparison of ICU performance.

Recent revisions of the major ICU scoring systems have broadened their database markedly and increased their statistical accuracy. For a specific patient, however, the systems cannot be accurate enough to direct management decisions. Significant questions remain about the reliability of these systems for comparing different ICUs and different patient populations, especially in surgical and trauma patients. Current scoring systems, therefore, cannot be used reliably in either the management of the individual patient or in the making of quality comparisons between ICUs.

Critical Care↗
PubMed2005

Simplifying the complexity surrounding ICU work processes--identifying the scope for information management in ICU settings.

A multi-site study, conducted in two English and two Danish intensive care units, investigates the complexity of work processes in intensive care, and the implications of this complexity for information management with regards to clinical information systems. Data were collected via observations, shadowing of clinical staff, interviews and questionnaires. The construction of role activity diagrams enabled the capture of critical care work processes. Upon analysing these diagrams, it was found that intensive care work processes consist of 'simplified-complexity', these processes are changed with the introduction of information systems for the everyday use and management of all clinical information. The prevailing notion of complexity surrounding critical care clinical work processes was refuted and found to be misleading; in reality, it is not the work processes that cause the complexity, the complexity is rooted in the way in which clinical information is used and managed. This study emphasises that the potential for clinical information systems that consider integrating all clinical information requirements is not only immense but also very plausible.

Denmark↗