SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “INHALATION”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1998

Clinical efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation capsules inhaled by Cyclohaler compared with Becotide Rotacaps inhaled by Rotahaler.

The study was undertaken to compare the efficacy and safety of beclomethasone dipropionate inhalation powder inhaled by Rotahaler (Becotide Rotacaps, Glaxo Wellcome) and by Cyclohaler (Beclomethasone Cyclocaps, Pharmachemie). Both the Cyclohaler and the Rotahaler are single-dose dry powder inhalation devices for inhalation capsules. 182 asthma patients stabilized on inhaled beclomethasone dipropionate 800 micrograms daily, were randomly assigned to treatment with 800 micrograms beclomethasone dipropionate inhaled by Rotahaler (91 patients) or Cyclohaler (91 patients) in a double-blind manner, using the double-dummy method. It was shown that the asthma remained stable during the 16-week study period with both preparations. There were no statistically significant differences in the pulmonary parameters (morning PEF, evening PEF, FEV1). The test/reference ratio of the morning PEF (99.5%, CI 93.0% - 106.5%) was well within the equivalence interval, which had been set a priori from 85% to 117.6%. There were no marked differences between the Cyclocaps and Rotacaps group in symptom scores and adverse events. A total of 12 patients had an asthma exacerbation: 8 exacerbations occurred in the Rotahaler group and 4 in the Cyclohaler group. The difference was not statistically significant. The use of rescue medication was somewhat higher in the Rotahaler group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance. Significantly more patients (17 patients) withdrew from the study in the Rotahaler group than in the Cyclohaler group (5 patients). In conclusion, there was no difference in asthma control of patients treated with Beclomethasone Cyclocaps inhaled by Cyclohaler and Becotide Rotacaps inhaled by Rotahaler. Both preparations are therapeutically equivalent.

Adult↗

PubMed1994

Comparison of inhaled terbutaline administered by either the Turbuhaler dry powder inhaler or a metered-dose inhaler with spacer in preschool children with asthma.

We compared the bronchodilator response of terbutaline delivered either by a dry powder inhaler, the Turbuhaler, or by a metered-dose inhaler attached to a Nebuhaler inhaler in 10 children with stable asthma who were 3 to 6 years of age. The bronchodilator response did not differ between the two inhalational devices. The dry powder inhaler Turbuhaler is a suitable alternative to a metered-dose inhaler in the delivery of terbutaline to preschool children with stable asthma if adequate inhalational technique is used.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1993

Evaluation of fluticasone propionate (500 micrograms day-1) administered either as dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler or pressurized inhaler and compared with beclomethasone dipropionate (1000 micrograms day-1) administered by pressurized inhaler.

Five hundred and eighty-five patients with moderate asthma, currently receiving 400-1000 micrograms day-1 of an inhaled corticosteroid, were treated for 6 weeks in a double-blind, randomized, parallel group study with either 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate as a dry powder via a Diskhaler inhaler, 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate via a pressurized inhaler or 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate via a pressurized inhaler. For all three treatment groups, mean morning and evening peak expiratory flow rates (PEFRs) increased within 1 week of the start of treatment. There were also improvements in clinic lung function, daytime and night-time asthma symptoms and a reduction in daytime and night-time rescue bronchodilator medication in all three groups. There were no statistically significant differences between the two formulations of fluticasone propionate in any of the efficacy parameters. Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler was significantly more effective than beclomethasone dipropionate over the 6 week study period in reducing diurnal variation (mean difference--4 l min-1, 95% CI--8 to 0 l min-1: P = 0.03). Fluticasone propionate via the Diskhaler produced a statistically significant improvement in night-time symptoms when compared to beclomethasone dipropionate whereas, beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1 was statistically significantly more effective than both formulations of fluticasone propionate in improving daytime symptoms (P < 0.05). However, these statistical differences must be viewed together with the fact that very few patients recorded a score of 2 or more for both daytime or night-time symptoms. There was a similarly low incidence of adverse events with all three treatments with no evidence of hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA)-axis suppression. The results of the 6-week comparative study showed that 500 micrograms day-1 fluticasone propionate whether administered via pressurized inhaler or Diskhaler is as effective and as safe as 1000 micrograms day-1 beclomethasone dipropionate administered via a pressurized inhaler in the treatment of moderate asthma. Over 12 months fluticasone propionate 500 micrograms day-1 via a pressurized inhaler was at least as effective and as well tolerated as beclomethasone dipropionate 1000 micrograms day-1.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1997

Relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lung following inhalation via a novel dry powder inhaler and a standard metered dose inhaler.

AIMS: The number of dry powder inhaler (DPI) devices could increase because they are easier to use than a metered dose inhaler (MDI). Using urinary excretion, the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the lungs and the body for a prototype DPI has been compared with an MDI. METHODS: A randomized, double-blind, two way crossover study compared the amount of salbutamol in the urine 30 min following inhalation of 2 x 100 micrograms salbutamol from a prototype DPI (Innovata Biomed Ltd, UK) and a Ventolin (Allen and Hanburys Ltd, UK) MDI in 10 volunteers. The amount of salbutamol and its metabolite, the ester sulphate conjugate, renally excreted up to 24 h post inhalation was also determined to evaluate the relative bioavailability of salbutamol to the body. RESULTS: The mean (s.d.) 30 min post-treatment urinary excretion for the prototype DPI and MDI was 8.4 (2.6) and 5.0 (1.9) micrograms, respectively (P < 0.001). The total amount of salbutamol and its ester metabolite excreted in the urine over the 24 h period after inhalation was 187.9 (77.6) and 137.6 (40.0) micrograms (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The prototype DPI delivered more salbutamol to the body and the lungs than a conventional MDI. This finding supports further development of the prototype DPI. The urinary salbutamol method is able to discriminate between two different inhalation systems.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2003

Enhanced synergy between fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhaled from a single inhaler versus separate inhalers.

BACKGROUND: The coadministration of long-acting inhaled beta(2)-agonists and inhaled corticosteroids is the most effective treatment for persistent asthma. OBJECTIVE: This meta-analysis aimed to determine the efficacy of fluticasone propionate and salmeterol inhaled from a single inhaler (combination therapy) or from separate inhalers (concurrent therapy). METHODS: Four similarly designed double-blind studies individually confirmed equivalence between combination and concurrent therapy on the basis of the primary efficacy measure (morning peak expiratory flow [PEF]). Each study showed a consistent trend in favor of combination therapy. Individual patient data from these studies were combined to provide overall estimates of treatment effect for morning PEF and other efficacy measures. RESULTS: Fixed-effects meta-analysis showed a significant advantage for combination therapy compared with concurrent therapy in morning PEF (mean difference between groups in change from baseline over 12 weeks of 5.4 L/min; P =.006; 95% CI = 1.5-9.2). Logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of achieving a greater than 15 or greater than 30 L/min improvement with combination therapy were increased by approximately 40% compared with those after concurrent therapy (15 L/min: odds ratio = 1.42, P =.008, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8; 30 L/min: odds ratio = 1.40, P =.006, 95% CI = 1.1-1.8), representing an additional 7% to 9% and 5% to 14% more patients, respectively, on combination therapy responding compared with those on concurrent therapy. CONCLUSION: The meta-analysis indicates that the fluticasone propionate plus salmeterol combination offers the potential for increased clinical efficacy over concurrent use of the same doses of the same 2 drugs. After administration from a single inhaler, fluticasone propionate and salmeterol might codeposit in the airways. It is hypothesized that this codeposition offers an increased opportunity for synergistic interaction to occur.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1996

Effect of inhalation flow rate on the dosing characteristics of dry powder inhaler (DPI) and metered dose inhaler (MDI) products.

Both the dose delivered from the device and the particle size of the medication are important parameters for inhalation products because they influence the amount of drug that is delivered to the patient's lung. The inspiratory flow rate may vary from dose to dose in a given patient and between patients. The Marple-Miller Cascade Impactor, a new multistage inertial impactor that operates at two flow rates (30 and 60 liters/min) with comparable particle size cut-offs, provides a means to study the effect of inhalation flow rate on the particle size distributions of inhalation products. The medication delivery, mass median aerodynamic diameter (MMAD), and fine particle mass were determined, in a randomized fashion, for albuterol, beclomethasone, budesonide, and terbutaline in both metered dose inhaler (MDI) and dry powder inhaler (DPI) products as a function of flow rate. In all cases, independent of drug or device used, the MDI products had a more reproducible respirable dose than the breath-actuated DPI products tested as a function of inhalation flow rate.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed1995

Inhaled nitric oxide versus inhaled prostacyclin and intravenous versus inhaled prostacyclin in acute respiratory failure with pulmonary hypertension in piglets.

This study was a prospective, randomized design to compare oxygenation and pulmonary hemodynamics between inhaled nitric oxide (NO) and inhaled prostacyclin (PGI2), and between inhaled and i.v. PGI2 in acute respiratory failure with pulmonary hypertension. Acute respiratory failure with pulmonary hypertension was induced in 12 piglets weighing 9-12 kg by repeated lung lavages and a continuous infusion of the stable endoperoxane analogue of thromboxane. Thereafter the animals were randomly assigned either for NO or PGI2 application. All animals were treated with different concentrations of NO or different doses of PGI2 applied i.v. and inhaled in random order. Continuous monitoring included ECG, central venous pressure (CVP), mean pulmonary artery pressure (MPAP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2), and mixed venous oxygen saturation (SvO2) measurements. NO inhalation of 10 ppm resulted in a significant increase in PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) from 7.8 +/- 1.34 kPa to 46.1 +/- 9.7 kPa. MPAP decreased significantly from 5.1 +/- 0.26 kPa to 3.7 +/- 0.26 kPa during inhaled NO of 40 ppm; i.v. infusion of PGI2 slightly increased oxygenation parameters. A significant increase in PaO2/FiO2 up to 32.4 +/- 3.1 kPa was observed during PGI2 aerosol delivery (p < 0.01); i.v. PGI2 decreased MAP from 11.5 +/- 0.39 kPa to 9.8 +/- 0.66 kPa (p < 0.05) and MPAP from 5.8 +/- 0.53 kPa to 4.5 +/- 0.66 kPa, respectively (p < 0.05). PGI2 aerosol delivery significantly decreased the MPAP to 3.7 +/- 0.53 kPa (p < 0.05) without influencing the MAP.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Acute Disease↗

PubMed1998

The bronchoprotective efficacy of salbutamol inhaled from a new metered-dose powder inhaler compared with a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler connected to a spacer.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from a new metered-dose powder inhaler (MDPI, Leiras Taifun, Finland) with that of a same dose of salbutamol inhaled from a conventional pressurized metered-dose inhaler with a large volume spacer (pMDI + S) in protecting against methacholine (Mch) induced bronchoconstriction. This was a 3 day, randomized, cross-over, partly blinded, placebo-controlled multicentre study where the pMDI + S was used as an open control. Twenty-six asthmatic outpatients with a baseline FEV1 > or = 60% of predicted and with bronchial hyperreactivity (PD20 FEV1 < or = 890 micrograms of Mch) were studied. On each study day the patients underwent an Mch provocation 30 min after inhaling placebo from the MDPI or a dose of 100 micrograms of salbutamol from the MDPI and from the pMDI + S. PD20 FEV1 and dose-response slope [DRS; maximal change in FEV1 (%)/dose of Mch (mumol)] were used to evaluate efficacy. The median values of PD20 FEV1 were 250, 622 and 1737 micrograms after placebo MDPI, salbutamol pMDI + S and salbutamol MDPI, respectively. The corresponding DRS values were -11.0%, -4.5% and -2.0% mumol-1. With both parameters, all differences were statistically significant (P < 0.05). In conclusion, 100 micrograms of salbutamol inhaled from Leiras Taifun MDPI offers better protection against Mch-induced bronchoconstriction than 100 micrograms of salbutamol from a pMDI connected to a large volume spacer device.

Adult↗

PubMed2000

Comparison of high dose inhaled steroids, low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline, and low dose inhaled steroids alone in chronic asthma in general practice.

BACKGROUND: Theophylline is widely used in the treatment of asthma, and there is evidence that theophylline has anti-inflammatory or immunomodulatory effects. A study was undertaken to determine whether theophylline added to low dose inhaled steroids would be as efficacious as high dose inhaled steroids in asthma. METHODS: In a study in general practice of 155 recruited asthmatic patients with continuing symptomatic asthma while on 400 microgram beclomethasone dipropionate (BDP) daily and inhaled beta(2) agonist as required, the effect of (1) continuing low dose inhaled steroids alone (LDS, 200 microgram BDP twice daily), (2) low dose inhaled steroids plus low dose theophylline (LDT, 400 mg daily), or (3) high dose inhaled steroids (HDS, 500 microgram BDP) over a six month period was examined. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty patients completed the study. Between group comparison using analysis of variance showed no overall differences in peak flow measurements, diurnal variation, and symptom scores. Changes in evening peak flows approached significance at the 5% level (p=0.077). The mean improvement in evening peak flow in the LDT compared with the LDS group was 20.6 l/min (95% confidence interval (CI) -2.5 to 38.8). In the LDT group there was an increase in evening peak flows at the end of the study compared with entry values (22.5 l/min), while in the LDS and HDS groups evening peak flows increased by 1.9 and 8.3 l/min, respectively. There was no significant difference in exacerbations or in side effects. CONCLUSION: There were no overall significant differences between the low dose steroid, low dose steroid with theophylline, and the high dose steroid groups. The greatest within-group improvement in evening peak flows was found after theophylline. A larger study may be necessary to show significant effects.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Adrenal suppression in asthmatic children receiving low-dose inhaled budesonide: comparison between dry powder inhaler and pressurized metered-dose inhaler attached to a spacer.

BACKGROUND: Dry powder inhalers (DPI) have in recent years become a common mode for administration of inhaled corticosteroids for preventive therapy of asthma. Inhaled steroids delivered by DPI achieve increased lung deposition compared with pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDI), which is associated with increased therapeutic effect. This may be associated with increased systemic absorption. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the prevalence of adrenal suppression in children using low-dose budesonide given by DPI, as compared with pMDI attached to a large-volume spacer device (pMDI + spacer). METHODS: In an open-labeled crossover study, 15 asthmatic children aged 5 to 15 years received 200 microg of inhaled budesonide twice daily by DPI (Turbuhaler, Astra, Draco AB, Lund, Sweden) and by pMDI + spacer, 1 month each, in a randomized order. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were performed at baseline and at the end of each of the 2 months of the study period, and urinary cortisol and creatinine were measured. RESULTS: Baseline urinary cortisol:creatinine was 0.038 +/- 0.012 microg/mg, similar in both groups. After 1 month of DPI therapy, urinary cortisol:creatinine was reduced by 27 +/- 16% to 0.028 +/- 0.012 microg/mg (P = 0.018). Urinary cortisol:creatinine after 1 month of pMDI + spacer therapy was similar to baseline 0.037 +/- 0.019 microg/mg (P = 0.78). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of asthmatic children with budesonide 400 microg daily given via a DPI for 1 month was associated with hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis suppression. This effect was not observed with the same dose of budesonide administered via pMDI + spacer. This indicates that systemic absorption might be reduced with pMDI + spacer therapy.

Absorption↗

PubMed1984

Inhalation pharmacokinetics: evaluating systemic extraction, total in vivo metabolism, and the time course of enzyme induction for inhaled styrene in rats based on arterial blood:inhaled air concentration ratios.

A method is described for evaluating systemic extraction of soluble vapors during inhalation exposures. The physiological basis of the method is the inability to achieve complete equilibrium of vapor between arterial blood and inhaled air whenever there is substantial extraction of the soluble vapor during a single pass through the systemic circulation. The technique was applied to estimate styrene extraction ratios at the end of 6-hr exposures in male rats exposed to various concentrations of inhaled styrene. From extraction ratios and several physiological constants, metabolic constants were evaluated for styrene metabolism in vivo. In naive rats, the maximum velocity of metabolism was 10.0 mg/kg/hr, and Km was of the order of 0.2 mg/liter. Pretreatment with pyrazole (320 mg/kg, 1/2 hr before exposure) essentially abolished in vivo styrene metabolism, while pretreatment with phenobarbital (80 mg/kg/day for the 4 days before styrene exposure) increased Vmax about sixfold. Prior exposure to styrene (1000 ppm for 6 hr/day on each of 4 days before experimentation) increased Vmax by a factor of 2. Significant induction of styrene metabolism in vivo was observed in 24-hr continuous exposure to 400, 600, or 1200 ppm. A curve fitting routine was employed with a physiological model of styrene inhalation kinetics to estimate the dynamics of the induction process in the 24-hr exposures. At 400 ppm, induction began after a lag of 15.5 hr, had a half-life of 3.5 hr, and reached 2.7 times the Vmax in naive rats. At 600 ppm, it began after 10.6 hr, proceeded with a half-life of 2.2 hr, and increased Vmax by 3.4 times. At 1200 ppm, induction began earlier, 4.6 hr, and reached a greater value, 4.4 times Vmax, but had a half-life similar to that at 600 ppm. No induction occurred in 48-hr exposure to 200 ppm. Induction complicates kinetic modeling of continuous inhalation with soluble, well-metabolized vapors because it is time and concentration dependent. These methods should prove useful for studying the in vivo metabolism of other soluble, well-metabolized vapors and for examining the time course of induction of the metabolizing enzymes for these chemicals.

Air↗

PubMed1995

Comparison of Diskus inhaler, a new multidose powder inhaler, with Diskhaler inhaler for the delivery of salmeterol to asthmatic patients. Canadian Study Group.

Administration of the long-acting beta 2-adrenoceptor agonist salmeterol from a new, easy-to-operate, multidose powder inhaler (Diskus) containing 60 sealed doses in a foil strip has been compared with administration from a Diskhaler inhaler in a multicenter, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group study. Asthmatic patients taking anti-inflammatory treatment, with baseline FEV1 > or = 60% and < or = 90% predicted were treated for 4 weeks with salmeterol 50 micrograms twice daily from either the Diskus or Diskhaler inhaler. The two treatments were equivalent (90% CLs for the difference in mean morning PEFR: -2.2, 8.7 L/min). The Diskus inhaler was rated easier to use and was preferred by more patients than the Diskhaler inhaler (73% vs. 15%).

Adolescent↗

PubMed2000

A study comparing the clinical pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of triamcinolone acetonide HFA-134a metered-dose inhaler and budesonide dry-powder inhaler following inhalation administration.

The impending phaseout of chlorofluorocarbons as propellants in pressurized metered-dose inhalers used in the treatment of asthma has resulted in the development of alternative devices to deliver drug to the pulmonary airways. These alternative devices include metered-dose inhalers using environmentally friendly hydroflurocarbon propellants and breath-actuated dry-powder inhalers. The purpose of this study was to compare the single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and tolerability of a newly developed hydroflurocarbon formulation of triamcinolone acetonide (Azmacort HFA 225 mcg Inhalation Aerosol) to that of the dry-powder formulation of budesonide (Pulmicort Turbuhaler 200 mcg). This three-way crossover study used 18 normal healthy subjects each receiving a 675 mcg dose of triamcinolone acetonide, 600 mcg dose of budesonide, or placebo twice a day for 5 days. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and last dose of test medication for pharmacokinetic analysis. Pharmacodynamics were assessed by changes in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis function as measured by 8 a.m. serum cortisol, 24-hour overnight serum cortisol AUC(0-24), and 24-hour urinary-free cortisol after the last evening dose of test drug. Tolerability was assessed through physical examinations, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, routine clinical labs, and adverse events recording. Both compounds were systemically absorbed. However, no significant drug accumulation was noted with chronic dosing. Chronic dosing did result in a statistically significant 20% reduction in basal 24-hour serum cortisol AUC(0-24) for both compounds. There were no clinically significant abnormalities in physical examination, vital signs, 12-lead ECG, or routine clinical labs noted during the study. Overall, the study drugs were well tolerated, with adverse events characterized as mild to moderate in severity.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2002

Absorption and metabolic effect of inhaled insulin: intrapatient variability after inhalation via the Aerodose insulin inhaler in patients with type 2 diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the intrapatient variability of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic responses to inhaled regular insulin (INH) delivered via the Aerodose Insulin Inhaler with that of subcutaneously injected regular insulin (SC) in patients with type 2 diabetes. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 15 patients with type 2 diabetes (nonsmokers, 10 men, aged 47-77 years) received two 240-unit doses of INH, delivered via a clinical Aerodose Insulin Inhaler and two 24-unit doses of SC under euglycemic clamp conditions on four separate study days. Glucose infusion rates (GIRs) and serum insulin concentrations were monitored over the following 8 h. Comparisons of intrapatient coefficients of variation (CV) were used to assess the reproducibility of INH versus SC. RESULTS: INH showed a bioavailability (0-8 h postdosing) of 16% and biopotency of 13% relative to SC. Comparison of the CVs (%) for area under the curve for serum insulin and GIR between INH and SC showed no significant differences between the treatments during 0-3 h (19% for INH versus 23% for SC) or 0-8 h (22% for INH versus 16% for SC). INH exhibited a shorter time to peak insulin concentration (T(max) [mean +/- SD] 76 +/- 51 vs. 193 +/- 66 min) and shorter time to peak metabolic effect (T(GIRmax) 170 +/- 53 vs. 244 +/- 75 min) compared with SC (P < 0.001). No adverse events were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Comparable dosing reproducibility and shorter time to peak action of INH compared with SC suggest that INH delivered via the Aerodose Insulin Inhaler can provide reliable preprandial dosing of insulin in patients with type 2 diabetes.

Absorption↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pressurised metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) versus dry powder inhalers devices (DPIs) to rapid-acting inhaled b2-agonists for asthma in children.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of pressurized metered-dose inhalers (MDIs) with that of dry powder inhalers (DPIs) in delivering short-acting b2-agonists in children with asthma. METHODS: Searches were performed in Medline (1997-March 2002), the Cochrane Library Database and the Embase reference lists of review articles and clinical trials. In addition, the international headquarters of b2-agonist manufacturers were contacted. We performed a review of randomized controlled trials. RESULTS: Ten randomized controlled trials were included. No differences in clinical effectiveness were found between MDIs and PDIs. Two studies reported that fewer adverse events occurred when the Turbuhaler was used. Two long-term studies in children found that children preferred the MDI to the Rotohaler. CONCLUSIONS: 1) In stable asthma, short-acting b2 bronchodilators in standard MDIs are as effective as dry powder inhalers. 2) Pooling of results was limited by the small number of studies and therefore no overall conclusions could be drawn. 3) From the limited data available, we found little or no evidence for an additional clinical benefit of DPI devices over standard MDIs in children with asthma.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗

PubMed2004

Efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide plus fenoterol inhaled via Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler vs. a conventional metered dose inhaler plus spacer in children with asthma.

The objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of ipratropium bromide/fenoterol hydrobromide (IB/FEN; Berodual) delivered from the novel propellant-free Respimat Soft Mist Inhaler (SMI) with that from a chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) metered-dose inhaler (MDI) plus spacer in children with asthma. The study followed a multicenter, randomized, double-blind (within Respimat SMI), parallel-group design. During the 2-week run-in period, patients received two actuations of CFC-MDI tid (IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg per actuation) via a spacer (Aerochamber) (MDI 40/100). Patients (n=535) were then randomized to: Respimat SMI containing IB 10 microg/FEN 25 microg (Respimat SMI 10/25), IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg (Respimat SMI 20/50), one actuation tid or CFC-MDI containing IB 20 microg/FEN 50 microg per actuation (in total 1B 40 microg/FEN 100 microg), or two actuations tid via Aerochamber (MDI 40/100), for 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change in forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) during the first 60 min after dosing (area under the curve from 0-1 h [AUC(0-1 h)]) on day 29. Analysis of the primary endpoint demonstrated that the efficacy of Respimat SMI 10/25 and 20/50 was equivalent to or greater than that of MDI 40/100. Similar results indicating that Respimat SMI 10/25 and 20/50 were not inferior to MDI 40/100 were also found on days 1 and 15. Analyses of other secondary endpoints supported these results. The safety profile of Respimat SMI was comparable to that of the CFC-MDI plus spacer. In conclusion, IB/FEN delivered via Respimat SMI is at least as effective as, and is as safe as, when delivered via CFC-MDI plus Aerochamber in children with asthma. Use of Respimat SMI thus enables a 2-4-fold reduction in the nominal dose of IB/FEN, and obviates the need for a spacer.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMed2005

Inhalation therapy with metered-dose inhalers and dry powder inhalers in mechanically ventilated patients.

Pressurized metered-dose inhalers (pMDIs) are commonly employed for administering bronchodilator aerosols to mechanically ventilated patients. Although it is feasible to employ dry powder inhalers in ventilator circuits, the presence of humidity in the ventilator circuit could reduce their efficiency. A complex array of factors influence drug delivery from pMDIs during mechanical ventilation, and subtle differences in the method of administration can markedly alter aerosol deposition in the lower respiratory tract. However, when the technique of administration is optimized, the efficiency of drug delivery from pMDIs in mechanically ventilated patients is comparable to that in ambulatory patients. Significant bronchodilator effects are observed with as few as 4 puffs from a pMDI and cylindrical spacer. In mechanically ventilated patients, pMDIs are a cost-effective, convenient, and safe method for delivering bronchodilator aerosols.

Administration, Inhalation↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pharmacodynamic study of procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler: evaluation of pharmacodynamic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler in asthma patients in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner.

Therapeutic equivalence between procaterol hydrochloride dry powder inhaler (Meptin DPI) and procaterol hydrochloride metered-dose inhaler (Meptin MDI), the currently marketed formulation, was assessed in 16 patients with bronchial asthma. The study was conducted in a randomized, double-dummy, double-blind crossover manner, using forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) as an index of bronchodilatory effect. In Period I, the patients received 20 mcg of either Meptin DPI or Meptin MDI, and then crossed over in Period II after a washout interval of 3--28 days. Pharmacodynamic equivalence was accessed using AUC (FEV1)/h and peak FEV1 as indices, and the data were analyzed by analysis of variance (ANOVA). Factors used for the analysis were the treatment group and/or carryover effect, patients within each group, period, and treatment. The 90% confidence intervals for the differences between the two treatments were --0.0995 to --0.0204 (L) for mean AUC (FEV1)/h and --0.102 to --0.022 (L) for mean peak FEV1, both within the acceptance criteria of --0.15 to 0.15 (L). Meptin DPI was therefore assessed as being equivalent to the current Meptin MDI.

Adrenergic beta-Agonists↗