PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Infection Control”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Job analysis 1996: Infection control professional. Certification Board in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc, 1996 Job Analysis Committee.

The Certification Board in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc, directed its Test and Administrative Subcommittees to compose a Job Analysis Committee in 1995. This 16-member Job Analysis Committee, in collaboration with Applied Measurement Professionals, Inc, conducted a job analysis survey of infection control professionals in the United States and Canada during 1996. The reassessment of the previous Certification Board in Infection Control and Epidemiology, Inc, task analysis, formation of a job-analysis survey tool, the actual job-analysis process, and its results are described in this article. The previous and newly revised test specification outlines are compared. The Revised Certification Examination for Infection Control offered beginning in 1997 will reflect the efforts of this endeavor.

Canada↗

Expanding the infection control team: development of the infection control liaison position for the neonatal intensive care unit.

Neonatal survival has risen progressively during the past 30 years. As the limits of viability continue to decline, the challenges of providing care to infants at the lowest extremes of gestational age and birth weight continually increase. Nosocomial infections in this very fragile population can be devastating. The complexity of care of these premature infants requires specialized knowledge of the neonate, infectious disease processes, and methods to reduce infection risks in the neonatal intensive care unit. The role of infection control liaison has been established in our institution as an adjunct to meeting this challenge by providing a line of communication between staff, neonatologists, and the infection control team. This article describes the role of the infection control liaison and its overall impact on the infection control program in an 87-bed level II, III, and IV neonatal intensive care unit from 1995 to 1999.

Cross Infection↗

Infection control in critically ill patients: effects of selective decontamination of the digestive tract.

The use of selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) to control infection in the intensive care unit (ICU) is reviewed. There are three basic patterns of infection in the ICU: primary endogenous, secondary endogenous, and exogenous. In exogenous infection, no microbial carriage precedes colonization and infection. In endogenous infection, infection is preceded by oropharyngeal or GI carriage. A primary endogenous infection is caused by an organism carried by the patient on admission to the ICU, whereas a secondary endogenous infection is caused by organisms acquired in the ICU. The traditional approach to infection control in the ICU has included frequent hand washing, limiting the use of agents for prophylaxis of stress-ulcer bleeding, and limiting the use of injectable antimicrobials to the treatment of infection in order to prevent resistance. The recognition that hand washing only partially reduces endogenous infection led to the use of nonabsorbable antimicrobials to abolish oropharyngeal and gastrointestinal carriage of potentially pathogenic microorganisms. In addition, the use of an injectable antimicrobial during the first four days in the ICU to control primary endogenous infection was considered not to lead to resistance as long as it was combined with nonabsorbable antimicrobials. Of 41 fully reported clinical trials of SDD, 33 showed a significant reduction of infectious morbidity among patients who received SDD. Of the 32 trials in which carriage of potential pathogens was a measured endpoint, 31 showed a reduction in carriage. Of the 24 studies in which resistance was an endpoint, 22 showed no increase in resistance associated with SDD. Only 10 of 35 trials that examined death showed a significant decrease in mortality. SDD, used in conjunction with traditional infection-control measures, diminishes microbial carriage and infectious morbidity in the ICU without increasing antimicrobial resistance.

Critical Care↗

The funding and organization of infection control in NHS hospital trusts: a study of infection control professionals' views.

The problems associated with hospital-acquired infection have been causing increasing concern in England in recent years. This paper reports the results of a nationwide survey of hospital infection control professionals' views concerning the organizational structures used to manage and obtain funding for control of infection. A complex picture with significant variation between hospitals emerges. Although government policy dictates that specific funding for hospital infection control is formally made available, it is not always the case that infection control professionals have adequate resources to undertake their roles. In some cases this reflects the failure of hospitals' infection control budgetary mechanisms; in others it reflects the effects of decentralizing budgets to directorate or ward level. Some use was made of informal mechanisms either to supplement or to substitute for the formal ones. But almost all infection control professionals still believed they were constrained in their ability to protect the hospital population from the risk of infectious disease. It is clear that recent government announcements that increased effort will be made to support local structures and thereby improve the control of hospital acquired infection are to be welcomed.

Attitude of Health Personnel↗

Practical risk-adjusted quality control charts for infection control.

BACKGROUND: Control chart methodology has been widely touted for monitoring and improving quality in the health care setting. P charts and U charts are frequently recommended for rate and ratio statistics, but their practical value in infection control may be limited because they (1) are not risk-adjusted, and (2) perform poorly with small denominators. The Standardized Infection Ratio is a statistic that overcomes both these obstacles. It is risk-adjusted, and it effectively increases denominators by combining data from multiple risk strata into a single value. SETTING: The AICE National Database Initiative is a voluntary consortium of US hospitals ranging in size from 50 to 900 beds. The infection control professional submits monthly risk-stratified data for surgical site infections, ventilator-associated pneumonia, and central line-associated bacteremia. METHODS: Run charts were constructed for 51 hospitals submitting data between 1996 and 1998. Traditional hypothesis tests (P values <.05) flagged 128 suspicious points, and participating infection control professionals investigated and categorized each flag as a "real problem" or "background variation." This gold standard was used to compare the performance of 5 unadjusted and 11 risk-adjusted control charts. RESULTS: Unadjusted control charts (C, P, and U charts) performed poorly. Flags based on traditional 3-sigma limits suffered from sensitivity <50%, whereas 2-sigma limits suffered from specificity <50%. Risk-adjusted charts based on the Standardized Infection Ratio performed much better. The most consistent and useful control chart was the mXmR chart. Under optimal conditions, this chart achieved a sensitivity and specificity >80%, and a receiver operating characteristic area of 0. 84 (P <.00001). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest a specific statistic (the Standardized Infection Ratio) and specific techniques that could make control charts valuable and practical tools for infection control.

Bacteremia↗

Clean construction. Advice on controlling infection risks during building projects.

When it comes to infection control, an ounce of prevention is, indeed, worth a pound of cure. This is especially true during construction projects. While the logistics and planning details required for an effective construction-generated infection control program may be daunting, they are nothing compared to the problems that could arise later if a program is not carried out.

Cross Infection↗

Psychological aspects of infection control and the care of the patient with HIV in dentistry.

HIV presents a number of challenges to the dentist. There is a need to control infection risks and, in spite of all the information available, a minority of dentists still have incomplete infection control procedures. The reasons for this and the implications for dental education are explored. There is also a need to ensure that the patient is optimally managed by the dentist and the importance of linkages to other services and the likely demands of patients on the dentist are reviewed. Finally the impact of treating the patient with HIV disease on the dentist and ways of minimising stress associated with the work are considered.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

Building new hospitals: a UK infection control perspective.

Infection control input is vital throughout the planning, design and building stages of a new hospital project, and must continue through the commissioning (and decommissioning) process, evaluation and putting the facility into full clinical service. Many hospitals continue to experience problems months or years after occupying the new premises; some of these could have been avoided by infection control involvement earlier in the project. The importance of infection control must be recognized by the chief executive of the hospital trust and project teams overseeing the development. Clinical user groups and contractors must also be made aware of infection control issues. It is vital that good working relationships are built up between the infection control team (ICT) and all these parties. ICTs need the authority to influence the process. This may require their specific recognition by the Private Finance Initiative National Unit, the Department of Health or other relevant authorities. ICTs need training in how to read design plans, how to write effective specifications, and in other areas with which they may be unfamiliar. The importance of documentation and record keeping is paramount. External or independent validation of processes should be available, particularly in commissioning processes. Building design in relation to infection control needs stricter national regulations, allowing ICTs to focus on more local usage issues. Further research is needed to provide evidence regarding the relationship between building design and the prevalence of infection.

Cross Infection↗