Evaluation of severe insomnia in the general population--implications for the management of insomnia: the UK perspective.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
SEARCH · PubMed Health
Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.
Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
Explore the source record for details and available documents.
The level of agreement among objective, subjective, and collateral assessments of insomnia was examined in 56 recovering alcoholics. Participants underwent a multimodal sleep assessment protocol consisting of sleep logs, actigraph recordings, questionnaires, and collateral reports of insomnia severity. All sleep measures confirmed moderate to severe insomnia in the study sample. Over 1 week of simultaneous sleep log and actigraph recording, the average disagreement between methods ranged from 16 min for sleep onset latency to 1 hr for wake time after sleep onset. Interrater agreement for the severity of insomnia symptoms using the Sleep Impairment Index was poor for subject-clinician, subject-collateral, and collateral-clinician rating pairs (intraclass correlation coefficients < .35). In general, recovering alcoholics' self-reported sleep reflected a greater severity of insomnia symptoms than did the actigraph and collateral measures. Given that such high levels of disagreement can occur in individual participants, researchers are advised to use a combination of sleep measures to assess insomnia in this population.
Impairments in sleep quality, timing, or duration disrupt normal sleep patterns. This systematic review and meta-analysis investigated the effects of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) protocols on sleep outcomes. Thirteen randomized controlled trials with parallel or crossover designs that applied tVNS intervention and assessed sleep quality (Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index) and insomnia severity (Athens Insomnia Scale and Insomnia Severity Index) were included. Effect sizes were calculated by comparing changes between the active tVNS and control groups. Moderator analyses examined whether stimulation of different targeted regions influences sleep outcomes. Meta-regression analyses examined potential relationships between the effects of tVNS protocols on sleep quality and demographic characteristics and multiple tVNS parameters, respectively. The random-effects meta-analysis indicated that tVNS protocols influenced better sleep quality and lower insomnia severity. Moderator variable analysis revealed that tVNS targeting the concha region induced better sleep quality. Meta-regression analysis revealed that better sleep quality was associated with lower ages of participants. These findings suggest that tVNS protocols, particularly those targeting the concha, were associated with favorable changes in sleep quality and insomnia severity, with age potentially moderating the treatment response.
STUDY OBJECTIVES: To describe patterns and severities of the daytime and nighttime symptoms of chronic insomnia patients. DESIGN: Exploratory chart review from clinicians' evaluation summaries, a self-report screening instrument, the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Beck Depression Inventory, the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist-90 (HSCL90). SETTING: A regional sleep disorders referral clinic. PATIENTS OR PARTICIPANTS: 94 patients with chronic insomnia (DSM-IV code 307.42), classified into the subgroups "Primary Insomnia," "Depression-Related," "Anxiety-Related," and "Other". INTERVENTIONS: N/A. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: Frequent symptoms occurred not only in nocturnal domains (e.g., sleep disturbances, environmental sensitivity), but also in daytime domains (e.g., cognitive difficulties, sleepiness). Compared to primary insomnia patients, those with depression-related insomnia endorsed more severe symptoms. All subgroups endorsed a generally similar symptom profile when single symptoms were considered in isolation. When considered conjointly, severe symptoms typical of depression and generalized social alienation had a high negative predictive value for primary insomnia. The number of severe symptoms on the HSCL90 was related to fewer sleep hours in the nonprimary insomnia subgroup but not in the primary insomnia subgroup. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic insomnia report significant daytime as well as nighttime symptoms. Depression-related and primary insomnias were separable only by some highly characteristic symptoms of depression. Diagnostic subgroups of insomnia patients may vary in how their overall distress relates to diminished self-reported sleep. Nighttime and daytime symptoms need to be assessed together when measuring insomnia severity.
Insomnia in psychiatric patients is frequently underestimated in clinical practice. Usually drugs are prescribed for the treatment of this disorder but non-pharmacological intervention can be successfully used. The present study aimed at evaluating the efficacy of a two-session psychoeducational intervention in improving persistent non-organic insomnia and reducing the administration of PRN therapy in severely mentally ill patients. A pre-post study was performed on 36 psychiatric patients admitted to a residential psychiatric unit. The Nocturnal Sleep Onset Scale (NSOS) and Daytime Sleepiness Scale (DSS), the sleep onset latency, the time awake after sleep onset and the numbers of awakenings were gathered 2 weeks before the intervention (T0), immediately prior the intervention (T1), 2 weeks after the last session of the intervention (T2) and a 3-month follow-up (T3). The total number of administrations of PRN therapy from T0 to T1 and from T1 to T2 were also examined. A significant reduction was shown on the NSOS, the sleep onset latency and in the time awake after sleep onset from T1 to T2 and from T1 to T3, while no significant difference was found between T0 and T1. A significant decrease on the mean number of administrations of PRN therapy was also found between 15 days before the intervention (T0-T1) and 15 days after intervention (T1-T2). The initial results of this study seems to suggest the possible efficacy of a short-term psychoeducational intervention on improving persistent non-organic insomnia in severely mentally ill patients. Further control studies are necessary to confirm these findings.
Twenty-five subjects suffering from severe chronic insomnia were treated for four weeks with 2 g of L-tryptophan in combination with a schedule of varying sleeping times which caused a sleep deficiency at the beginning of treatment. A second four-week period without L-tryptophan was used as a control. Nineteen subjects (76%) experienced a markedly improved sleeping pattern after four weeks; the sleeping behavior of ten of these subjects, however, deteriorated again after the control period. Daily self-rating protocols revealed that the subjects' sleep improved significantly between the 10th and 15th day after starting treatment. Further sleep-related items such as "activity", "mood", "nervous tension", "contentment", and "quality of the preceding day" were also evaluated. This treatment schedule can thus be recommended for the treatment of severe chronic insomnia.
INTRODUCTION AND METHODS: Cognitive deficits in insomnia have been already reported (5), however, a correlation between cognitive impairment and severity of insomnia was not as yet studied. Sixteen not medicated patients with primary insomnia according to DSM-IV (4), 7 men an 9 women, of mean age 40.8 year, were compared to 16 controls, matched according to age, sex and education. Standard polysomnographic data (PSG) were recorded. The next day all the subjects completed Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) (7), Hyperarousal Scale (HS) (6), Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D), Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Multiple Sleep Latency Test (MSLT) (3), Continuous Attention Test (CAT) with simple reaction time (RT) (8) and Selective Reminding Test (SRT) (2). RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: The psychophysiological differences between patients and controls are shown in Table I. HAM-D and BDI scores were elevated in patients, although none of the patients met clinical criteria of depression. Insomniacs did not differ in the immediate recall, but the number of repetitions necessary to learn all the items of SRT was greater in patients. Insomniacs usually complain of poor performance, however, learning impairment has not been documented in insomnia. Degree of the learning impairment correlated with insomnia score (Fig. 1). Cognitive deficit cannot be due to a daytime sleepiness because sleep latency in all MSLT sessions was not shorter in insomniacs. No correlations between results of SRT and standard PSG parameters were found, in accordance with the thesis that subjective feeling of nonrestorative sleep and other accompanying deficits are only symptoms of an underlying 24-hour disorder (1).
We studied sleep patterns for three nights in 10 subjects with moderate to severe progressive supranuclear palsy and correlated the findings with disease severity using quantitative measures of motor, cognitive, and eye movement impairment. All subjects had severe insomnia, spending 2 to 6 hours awake per night; the mean time awake per night for the group was more than 4 hours. Sleep latency became shorter and the number of awakenings increased with greater motor impairment, and total sleep time declined as dementia worsened. These findings indicate that in progressive supranuclear palsy insomnia is related to disease severity. Insomnia associated with progressive supranuclear palsy appears to be worse than the insomnia of Parkinson's disease or Alzheimer's disease and may be due to degenerative changes in brain structures responsible for sleep maintenance.
Poor sleep quality is closely associated with autonomic dysregulation and increased risks of cardiovascular, metabolic, and mental disorders. Foot reflexology is a widely used complementary therapy; however, its physiological mechanisms and comparative efficacy remain insufficiently explored. This study aimed to compare the effects of manual reflexology treatment (MRT) and foot massage equipment (FEM) on autonomic nervous system function, sleep quality, insomnia severity, and fatigue in adults with poor sleep quality. Using a randomized crossover design, 32 participants with poor sleep quality received MRT and FEM interventions for 6 weeks each (once weekly, 30-40 min/session). Heart rate (HR), blood pressure, and heart rate variability (HRV; time- and frequency-domain indices) were assessed at weeks 1 and 6 before and after each intervention. Subjective outcomes included the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), Insomnia Severity Index (ISI), and Fatigue Assessment Scale (FAS). Following MRT, participants demonstrated significantly greater reductions in global PSQI scores and all PSQI components compared with FEM. MRT also resulted in larger improvements in insomnia severity and both mental and physical fatigue. In contrast, FEM primarily improved physical fatigue. Physiologically, MRT induced an immediate decrease in HR and significant increases in HRV time-domain indices (SDNN, RMSSD, pNN50), which were sustained after 6 weeks. Frequency-domain analysis further revealed reduced LF, increased HF, and a lower LF/HF ratio, indicating enhanced parasympathetic activity and cumulative autonomic modulation. In conclusion, programmed manual reflexology, delivered according to the TIDieR framework, is more effective than mechanical foot massage in improving autonomic balance, sleep quality, insomnia severity, and fatigue in individuals with poor sleep quality. These findings support MRT as a feasible and evidence-based non-pharmacological complementary intervention for sleep health promotion. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov; NCT Number: NCT07402460; Registered 3 February 2026.
OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to determine if insomnia severity, dysfunctional beliefs about sleep, and depression predicted sleep-related safety behaviors. METHOD: Standard sleep-related measures (such as the Insomnia Severity Index; the Dysfunctional Beliefs About Sleep scale; the Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale; and the Sleep-Related Behaviors Questionnaire) were administered. Additionally, 14 days of sleep diary (Pittsburg Sleep Diary) data and actual use of sleep-related behaviors were collected. RESULTS: Regression analysis revealed that dysfunctional beliefs about sleep predicted sleep-related safety behaviors. Insomnia severity did not predict sleep-related safety behaviors. Depression accounted for the greatest amount of unique variance in the prediction of safety behaviors, followed by dysfunctional beliefs. Exploratory analysis revealed that participants with higher levels of depression used more sleep-related behaviors and reported greater dysfunctional beliefs about their sleep. CONCLUSION: The findings underlie the significant influence that dysfunctional beliefs have on individuals' behaviors. Moreover, the results suggest that depression may need to be considered as an explicit component of cognitive-behavioral models of insomnia.
BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic insomnia are more likely to develop affective disorders, cardiac morbidity, and other adverse health outcomes, yet many clinicians tend to trivialize the complaint of insomnia or to attribute it only to psychiatric causes. OBJECTIVES: To estimate the prevalence and longitudinal course of insomnia in patients with documented chronic medical illness and/or depression and to quantify the associations between specific chronic conditions and insomnia. METHODS: The presence of mild or severe insomnia was based on responses to a sleep questionnaire completed by 3445 patients with at least 1 of 5 physician-identified chronic conditions (hypertension, diabetes, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction, or depression) at baseline; a subsample of 1814 patients completed follow-up questionnaires at 2 years. Using multivariate techniques, we evaluated the relationship between chronic conditions, patient-reported comorbidities, and insomnia (complaints of initiating and maintaining sleep), adjusting for sociodemographics and health habits. RESULTS: Sixteen percent of study patients had severe and 34% had mild insomnia at baseline. At 2-year follow-up, 59% (95% confidence interval, 55%-63%) of patients with mild insomnia and 83% (95% confidence interval, 78%-88%) of patients with severe insomnia at baseline still had sleep problems. Odds ratios corresponding to mild and severe insomnia for key risk factors were as follows: current depressive disorder, 2.6 and 8.2; subthreshold depression, 2.2 and 3.4; congestive heart failure, 1.6 and 2.5; obstructive airway disease, 1.6 and 1.5; back problems, 1.4 and 1.5; hip impairment, 2.2 and 2.7; and prostate problems, 1.6 and 1.4. The majority of insomnia-comorbidity associations observed at baseline persisted at 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with insomnia require follow-up, as the majority continue to be bothered by difficulty initiating and maintaining sleep. In addition to detecting affective disorders in patients with insomnia, clinicians should focus on medical conditions that disturb sleep, especially cardiopulmonary disease, painful musculoskeletal conditions, and prostate problems.
OBJECTIVE: To assess an uncontrolled, open-label trial of sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) treatment on two different samples of chronic insomnia patients. METHOD: In Study 1 (Retrospective), data from one diagnostic and one continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration polysomnogram were compiled from 19 chronic insomnia patients with SDB. Objective polysomnogram indicators of sleep and arousal activity and self-reported sleep quality were measured. In Study 2 (Prospective), clinical outcomes were assessed after sequential cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) and SDB therapy (CPAP, oral appliances, or bilateral turbinectomy) were provided to 17 chronic insomnia patients with SDB. Repeat measures included the Insomnia Severity Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, and self-reported insomnia indices and CPAP use. RESULTS: In Study 1, seven objective measures of sleep and arousal demonstrated or approached significant improvement during one night of CPAP titration. Sixteen of 19 patients reported improvement in sleep quality. In Study 2, Insomnia Severity Index, Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire, and Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index improved markedly with CBT followed by SDB treatment and achieved an average outcome equivalent to curative status. Improvements were large for each treatment phase; however, of 17 patients, only 8 attained a nonclinical level of insomnia after CBT compared with 15 patients after SDB therapy was added. Self-reported insomnia indices also improved markedly, and self-reported SDB therapy compliance was high. CONCLUSIONS: In one small sample of chronic insomnia patients with SDB, objective measures of insomnia, arousal, and sleep improved during one night of CPAP titration. In a second small sample, validated measures of insomnia, sleep quality, and sleep impairment demonstrated clinical cures or near-cures after combined CBT and SDB therapies. These pilot results suggest a potential value in researching the pathophysiological relationships between SDB and chronic insomnia, which may be particularly relevant to patients with refractory insomnia.