PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Insurance Coverage”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

Differences in private health insurance coverage for working male Hispanics.

In 1993, 33.8% of all nonelderly adult Hispanics living in the United States lacked health insurance coverage (either private or public), compared to 8.1% of the entire nonelderly population. Because Hispanics are more likely to be uninsured than any other ethnic group and because they are the fastest growing minority group in the United States, the increase in the Hispanic population is likely to increase the proportion of the population without health insurance. Particularly striking are differences in private health insurance coverage among the three major Hispanic groups--Cuban-Americans, Mexican-Americans, and Puerto Ricans. In this paper, regression-based decomposition analysis is used to explain the sources of differences in private health insurance coverage among working males in these three group. The results indicate that among the study population, Cuban-Americans have higher rates of private health insurance coverage than Mexican-Americans and Puerto Ricans, and that wage rates, levels of education, age, occupation, and marital status explain most of the difference.

Adult↗

Explaining trends in health insurance coverage between 1988 and 1991.

This paper uses regression-based decompositions to examine the downward trend in insurance coverage between 1988 and 1991. I find that falling family incomes account for much of the decline in overall insurance coverage, while a secular decline in insurance coverage across all industries, firm sizes, employment statuses, income levels, and demographic groups accounts for most of the decline in employer-sponsored insurance among workers. Rising unemployment and changing patterns of industrial employment explain little of the decline in coverage across the entire population. Taken together, these results suggest that fewer employers are offering health coverage, workers are finding it difficult to pay their share of the premiums, and those without access to employer-sponsored plans are finding it harder to purchase nongroup insurance. Thus, it appears that the rising cost of health insurance coupled with falling incomes and profits during the recession account for the fall in health insurance coverage between 1988 and 1991.

Family↗

The influence of outpatient insurance coverage on the microvascular complications of non-insulin-dependent diabetes in Mexican Americans.

Does poor health insurance coverage contribute to increased microvascular complications (nephropathy and retinopathy) in Mexican Americans with non-insulin-dependent diabetes? Mexican-American subjects with diabetes were identified in a population-based cardiovascular risk factor survey, the San Antonio Heart Study. Retinopathy, nephropathy, source of health care, and type and extent of health insurance coverage were assessed in a special diabetes complications exam. Among Mexican-American subjects with non-insulin-dependent diabetes diagnosed prior to their participation in the survey (n = 255), 26% (n = 67) lacked any type of health insurance, and 28% relied on county- or federal-funded clinics rather than private doctors as their primary source of care. Among those with health insurance (188 of 255), only 68% (127 of 188) or 24% of the total sample had private health insurance, and, of those with private insurance, 48% (35 of 73) received reimbursement for outpatient doctor visits and 57% for outpatient medications. Microvascular complications were more common among those who received their health care from a clinic versus a private doctor, and among those who lacked health insurance coverage for outpatient doctor visits and medications. Thus, poor health insurance coverage in the outpatient setting correlates with higher rates of microvascular complications among Mexican Americans with non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus.

Albuminuria↗

Supplemental health insurance coverage among aged Medicare beneficiaries.

The goal of the National Medical Care Utilization and Expenditure Survey (NMCUES) of 1980 was to improve the understanding of the ways in which Americans use and pay for health care. This report is one in a series of descriptive reports based on NMCUES data. Data concerning insurance coverage were collected from household respondents in NMCUES. These data included the kind of insurance in effect for each person, the services covered, and the amounts paid by each source. In addition, the administration of private insurance plans and the kinds of charges covered were identified. The purpose of this report is to provide descriptive information about supplemental insurance coverage among the aged Medicare population with special emphasis on private supplemental health insurance coverage. For this report, supplemental insurance is defined as coverage (i.e., Medicaid, private, or other) in addition to Medicare and is to be distinguished from the Supplementary Medical Insurance part of Medicare that is known as SMI or Part B of Medicare. The results presented are based on data collected about the civilian, noninstitutionalized persons in the NMCUES national household sample who at any time during the survey year of 1980: (1) were 65 years of age or over, and (2) reported having been covered by Medicare Hospital Insurance (HI), or Medicare Supplementary Medical Insurance (SMI), or both. This report uses time-adjusted estimates that assign a single individual to different categories of insurance coverage according to the proportion of the year that he or she was covered by each kind of insurance. Consequently, estimates are made for person-years of coverage although they are expressed as persons for convenience. Approximately 4 out of 5 aged Medicare beneficiaries reported having some kind of insurance coverage in addition to Medicare during 1980. Approximately 67 percent of the aged Medicare population are estimated to have had private insurance in addition to Medicare; an estimated 13 percent had Medicaid. (Both of these estimates include 2.5 percent who reported Medicaid and private insurance simultaneously.) About 21 percent of the aged Medicare beneficiaries reported that Medicare was their only source of third-party coverage. The percentage of the aged Medicare beneficiaries who reported Medicare as their only source of third-party coverage was consistently 20 percent regardless of health status. However, the distribution among insurance categories of the remaining 80 percent who reported supplemental coverage of some type varied by health status. Medicare beneficiaries who were in poor health were much more likely to have Medicaid than Medicare beneficiaries who reported being in excellent health.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Aged↗

Health insurance coverage and outcome following acute myocardial infarction. A community-wide perspective.

BACKGROUND: Several studies have suggested that type of medical insurance coverage is associated with hospital utilization rates and receipt of selected diagnostic or treatment approaches. To our knowledge no studies, however, have examined the relation between medical insurance coverage and short-term outcomes following acute myocardial infarction (AMI) from a multihospital, community-wide perspective. OBJECTIVE: To examine the association between medical insurance coverage and in-hospital case-fatality rates as well as length of hospital stay following AMI. METHODS: The study sample consisted of 3735 residents of the Worcester, Mass, metropolitan area hospitalized with validated AMI during 1986, 1988, 1990, 1991, and 1993 at all metropolitan Worcester hospitals. Data were obtained from the review of medical records. Patients were stratified into 5 medical insurance groups for purposes of analysis: private or commercial (n = 711), Medicaid (n = 101), Medicare (n = 1991), health maintenance organization (n = 741), and self-pay or other (n = 191). Crude and multivariable-adjusted analyses were used to examine the relation between medical insurance coverage and length of hospital stay and in-hospital case-fatality rates following AMI. RESULTS: In-hospital case-fatality rates during the period under study were 7.7%, 11.9%, 21.4%, 9.3%, and 10.0% in the 5 medical insurance groups, respectively. After adjusting for several factors that may affect in-hospital mortality, relative to the referent group of private or commercial insurance patients (odds ratio, 1.0), the multivariable-adjusted odds for dying during the acute hospitalization were 0.87 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56-1.36) for health maintenance organization patients, 1.22 (95% CI, 0.55-2.68) for Medical patients, 1.25 (95% CI, 0.85-1.84) for Medicare patients, and 1.21 (95% CI, 0.60-2.44) for self-pay or other patients. The mean length of hospitalization after excluding patients with a prolonged hospitalization was 10.1 days for private or commercial insurance patients, 9.4 days for health maintenance organization patients, 10.9 days for Medicaid patients, 11.1 days for Medicare patients, and 9.8 days for self-pay or other patients. No significant differences in the average duration of hospitalization were seen between the medical insurance groups after controlling for potential confounding variables. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this population-based study suggest that patient insurance status is not significantly associated with either length of hospital stay or short-term mortality following AMI. Other demographic and clinical prognostic factors appear to be more important predictors of short-term outcome in this patient population.

Adult↗

Health insurance coverage after welfare.

This DataWatch examines the health insurance coverage of former welfare recipients who left welfare between January 1995 and mid-1997, using data from the 1997 National Survey of America's Families. Although the majority of women who left welfare were working, only 33 percent of these women obtained health coverage through their jobs. Rates of uninsurance increase with the number of months since leaving welfare and with declines in Medicaid coverage. A year or more after leaving welfare, 49 percent of women and 30 percent of children were uninsured.

Adult↗

Health insurance coverage of the children of immigrants in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: This study assesses the health insurance coverage of children of immigrants in the United States and variations among immigrant groups. METHOD: The study uses data from the March supplements of the 1994 and 1996 Current Population Survey to compare health insurance coverage of children who report foreign parentage. Separate logistic regressions are conducted to estimate the likelihood of being covered by any insurance, public insurance, and private insurance. RESULTS: 27.3% of all children of immigrants are without health insurance, 34.1% are on public insurance, and 44.3% have private insurance. Foreign-born children who have not yet become U.S. citizens are the most likely to be without health insurance (38.0%). Many of these children are not covered because their parents are unable to find jobs that provide coverage and Medicaid fails to enroll as many of them as possible. Overall, the children's chances of being covered by any health insurance vary little according to when their parents came to this country. However, children of recent immigrants are more likely to rely on public health insurance (40.1% vs. 24.8%) and less likely to be covered through private sources (36.8% vs. 60.6%) than those of established immigrants. Among immigrant groups, children of Haitian (48.4%) and Korean (45.3%) immigrants are at the highest risks of being uninsured. Both children of the Dominican Republic (65.9%) and Laos (83.3%) report high rates of public insurance coverage. CONCLUSIONS: Greater disparity in health insurance coverage among children of immigrants is expected once the new welfare reform bills take effect. In particular, noncitizen children, children of recent immigrants, illegal immigrants, and Dominican Republican immigrants will be affected most. Efforts aimed at reducing the harm should target these vulnerable groups.

Animals↗

Insurance coverage for prescription drugs: effects on use and expenditures in the Medicare population.

BACKGROUND: Although most of the elderly are covered by Medicare, they potentially face large out-of-pocket costs for their health care because of excluded services. Aside from nursing home care, the exclusion of prescription drugs is one of the most significant. Several earlier policy initiatives have proposed adding prescription drug coverage to the Medicare program. To determine the effects of such an expansion, one must account for the potential increase in the demand for prescription drugs from providing insurance coverage. METHODS: The study uses a new data source, the RAND Elderly Health Supplement to the 1990 Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID). The endogenity of insurance coverage is tested using instruments that exploit the longitudinal nature of the data. Equations are estimated on 910 persons (> or = 66 years) using a two-part model. RESULTS: Insurance coverage for prescription drugs significantly increases the probability of use, but not of total expenditures, among those who use prescription drugs. However, insurance coverage significantly lowers out-of-pocket expenditures, thereby decreasing the financial burden on elderly households associated with prescription drug use. Medicaid coverage has effects that are smaller than those for private insurance, but the magnitude is less precisely estimated. These findings imply that if prescription drug coverage were added to Medicare, expected expenditures on drugs would rise by on average $83 for each elderly Medicare beneficiary (in 1990 dollars), although this increase is significant only at the 90% level. If the benefit had been included under Medicare, expected spending on prescription drugs by the elderly would have risen by approximately 20%, or $2.6 billion in 1990.

Aged↗

Health care access among Mexican Americans with different health insurance coverage.

This study describes the rates of health care access among Mexican Americans with different health insurance coverage. An interview questionnaire was used to collect information regarding sociodemographics, perceived health status, health insurance coverage, and sources of health care from a random sample of 501 Mexican Americans from San Antonio, Texas. Health care access was determined more by having health insurance coverage than by health care needs. Poor Mexican Americans with health insurance had higher health care access rates than did poor Mexican Americans without health insurance. Health care access may improve health care outcomes, but more comprehensive community-based campaigns to promote health and better use of health services in underprivileged populations should be developed.

Adult↗

Gender impacts on health insurance coverage: findings for unmarried full-time employees.

Probit regression is applied to a sample of fully employed unmarried respondents from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey to determine the likelihood of private health insurance vs. no insurance coverage. Gender-related employment segregation is a strong indicator for insurance coverage, since those in male-dominated industries are more likely to have coverage. The strong impact of unions and number of plans offered on insurance coverage suggests that insurance purchasing cooperatives and managed competition may increase availability of affordable coverage, thus alleviating some of the financial barriers to health care.

Adult↗

Children's health insurance coverage and family structure, 1977-1996.

Using data from a series of nationally representative medical expenditure surveys, the authors document changes in children's health insurance coverage in a period of two decades. Overall, it is found that the proportion of children with private coverage declined, while the proportions publicly insured and uninsured increased. However, when the authors account for differences in family structure, they find striking disparities in children's insurance experiences. Contrary to overall trends, children in single-parent households made significant gains in private health insurance coverage after 1997 and experienced reductions in public insurance. Coincident with Medicaid expansions in the late 1980s, children in two-parent households experienced significant increases in public health insurance. It is found that the rise in the proportion of children who were uninsured in this period was largely a single-parent family phenomenon, and that parents' marital status, employment status, and family income are crucial factors associated with children's insurance status.

Child↗

A critical review of the arguments for insurance coverage for smoking-cessation therapies.

This article elucidates the reasons most insurance companies do not cover smoking-cessation therapies despite their obvious benefits. It critically reviews the arguments for and against using a universal mandate as a strategy to increase use of smoking-cessation programs to realize the associated health benefits and cost-savings. While convincing arguments exist to mandate insurance coverage for self-destructive health behaviors, their merit is tempered by several valid counter arguments. For example, insurance coverage for small, routine, and predictable events, such as smoking-cessation treatment, violates the "first principles" of what ought to be covered when considered from the traditional insurance perspective. An insurance solution to risky behaviors may be to make undesirable behaviors more undesirable to individuals by raising premiums rather than to make them less undesirable with subsidies.

Cost Savings↗

Racial and ethnic differences in health insurance coverage for adults with diabetes.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the extent and types of health insurance coverage in a representative sample of adults with diabetes in the U.S. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: The Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey included national samples of non-Hispanic whites, non-Hispanic blacks, and Mexican-Americans aged > or = 20 years. Information on medical history and treatment of diabetes was obtained to determine subjects who had been diagnosed with diabetes by a physician before the survey (n = 1,503) and subjects without diagnosed diabetes (n = 17,319). Information on health insurance coverage was obtained via a structured questionnaire for 96% of participants. RESULTS: A total of 93% of all adults with diabetes had some form of health insurance. Of these subjects, 73% had private insurance, 48% had Medicare coverage, 15% had Medicaid coverage, and 5% had Champus/Veterans Affairs coverage. Approximately 52% of adults with diabetes had multiple types of health insurance, and 54% had health care coverage through one or more government-sponsored programs. A greater proportion of non-Hispanic whites (91%) and non-Hispanic blacks (89%) than Mexican-Americans (66%) had health insurance among subjects aged 20-64 years. For those aged > or = 65 years, coverage was virtually 100% for all racial and ethnic groups. Non-Hispanic whites had the highest rate of coverage through private insurance (81%), with non-Hispanic blacks having an intermediate rate (56%) and Mexican-Americans having the lowest rate (45%). Rates of coverage were similar for adults with and without diabetes in each racial and ethnic group for any type of insurance and for private insurance. CONCLUSIONS: There are marked racial and ethnic differences in health insurance coverage for adults with diabetes, although these differences are similar to those for adults without diabetes. Whether these racial and ethnic disparities influence access to care, quality of care, or health outcomes for people with diabetes remains to be determined.

Adult↗

Differences in hospital resource allocation among sick newborns according to insurance coverage.

OBJECTIVE: To assess whether newborns' insurance coverage was associated with differences in the allocation of hospital services. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of computerized hospital discharge data, comparing resource allocation among newborns according to insurance status, controlling for race/ethnicity, diagnoses, hospital characteristics (ownership, teaching status, nursery level), and disposition. SETTING: All California civilian acute-care hospitals. PATIENTS: Population-based sample, excluding out-of-hospital and military hospital births. Resource allocation was studied among all newborns discharged in 1987 with evidence of serious problems (N = 29,751). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Length of stay, total charges, and charges per day. RESULTS: Sick newborns without insurance received fewer inpatient services than comparable privately insured newborns with either indemnity or prepaid coverage. This pattern was observed across all hospital ownership types. Mean stay was 15.7 days for all privately insured newborns (15.6 days for those with indemnity and 15.7 days for those with prepaid coverage), 14.8 days for Medicaid-covered newborns, and 13.2 days for uninsured newborns (P less than .001). Length of stay, total charges, and charges per day were 16%, 28%, and 10% less, respectively, for the uninsured than for all privately insured newborns (P less than .001). Resources for newborns covered by Medicaid were generally greater than for the uninsured and less than for the privately insured. Both uninsured and Medicaid-covered newborns were found to have more severe medical problems than the privately insured. CONCLUSIONS: The findings cannot be explained by differences in medical need or by differences in non-medically indicated services; they constitute prima facie evidence of inequities that need to be addressed by policy changes.

California↗

Changing patterns of health insurance coverage: special concerns for women.

Health care expenditures and utilization have increased dramatically in recent years, but gaps in health insurance coverage restrict access to care for a growing portion of the population. Women are especially vulnerable given the structure of insurance coverage and demographic factors. The erosion of insurance coverage can be attributed to several trends, particularly employer cost containment strategies, restricted public program eligibility and changes in the characteristics of the work force. Numerous measures have been adopted at the federal and state levels to maintain or expand coverage on an incremental basis. As broader segments of the population suffer reduction or loss of coverage, a comprehensive approach will be necessary to ensure universal access to health care.

Adolescent↗

Health insurance coverage of the unemployed: COBRA and the potential effects of Kassebaum-Kennedy.

We use the April 1993 Current Population Survey to examine the health insurance coverage decisions of the unemployed and to simulate the potential effects of the new Kassebaum-Kennedy legislation. After controlling for demographic characteristics, COBRA eligibility raises the probability of health insurance coverage by 0.095, while eligibility for spouse employer insurance increases the likelihood of coverage by 0.318, and eligibility for both increases the likelihood of coverage by 0.341. In our simulations, we find that had Kassebaum-Kennedy been in effect in April 1993, 9.0 percent of the unemployed would be eligible to take up coverage, and the coverage rate of the unemployed would have been increased by 0.85 percent to 1.5 percent from 41.6 percent. Our estimates of the effect of Kassebaum-Kennedy on health insurance coverage are much lower than those reported by the Government Accounting Office prior to the passage of the legislation.

Eligibility Determination↗