PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “LexA Repressor Protein”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1991

Repression of the E coli recA gene requires at least two LexA protein monomers.

To analyze the DNA binding domain of E coli LexA repressor and to test whether the repressor binds as a dimer to DNA, negative dominant lexA mutations affecting the binding domain have been isolated. A large number of amino acid substitutions between amino acid positions 39 and 46 were introduced using cassette mutagenesis. Mutants defective in DNA binding were identified and then examined for dominance to lexA+. A number of substitutions weakened repressor function partially, whereas other substitutions led to a repressor with no demonstrable activity and a defective dominant phenotype. Since the LexA binding site has dyad symmetry, we infer that this dominance results from interaction of monomers of wild-type LexA protein with mutant monomers and that an oligomeric form of repressor binds to operator. The binding of LexA protein to operator DNA was investigated further using a mutant protein, LexA408, which recognizes a symmetrically altered operator mutant but not wild-type operator. A mixture of mutant LexA408 and LexA+ proteins, but neither individual protein, bound to a hybrid recA operator consisting of mutant and wild-type operator half sites. These results suggest that at least 1 LexA protein monomer interacts with each operator half site. We discuss the role of LexA oligomer formation in binding of LexA to operator DNA.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1989

Amino acid similarities to other proteins offer insights into roles of UmuD and UmuC in mutagenesis.

The products of the umuD and umuC genes are required for most uv and chemical mutagenesis in Escherichia coli. The genes are organized in an operon that is repressed by LexA and regulated as part of the SOS response. The umuD protein shares homology with the carboxyl-terminal domain of LexA. Genetic evidence now indicates that RecA-mediated cleavage activates UmuD for its role in mutagenesis. The COOH-terminal fragment of UmuD is both necessary and sufficient for this role. Similarities of UmuD to gene 45 protein of bacteriophage T4 and of UmuC to gene 44 protein and gene 62 protein suggest possible roles for UmuD and UmuC in mutagenesis that are supported by preliminary evidence.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1983

Autoinduced synthesis of colicin E2.

Escherichia coli K-12 cells carrying the high copy number plasmid ColE2-P9 and a sfiA-lacZ gene fusion exhibit abnormally high levels of SOS-regulated phi sfiA-lacZ expression. Increased sfiA-lacZ expression is caused by the action of colicin E2, which is a DNase, rather than by the presence of multiple copies of a binding site for LexA protein, the repressor for the sfiA and colicin E2 genes. Expression of sfiA-lacZ was reduced to normal levels if the ColE2+ strain lacked the outer membrane colicin E2 receptor protein (BtuB) or if they carried an increased number of colicin E2 immunity genes. The results suggest that cultures of ColE2+ strains contain a small number of cells which produce colicin which can then enter other, non-producing cells in the culture and cause sufficient damage to the DNA to induce the SOS system. The levels of colicin E2 immunity in the producing cells is presumably sufficient to prevent extensive lethal effects of the colicin, but insufficient to prevent limited endonuclease activity. An important consequence of this phenomenon is that the DNase action of colicin E2 can stimulate its own production.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1985

Dual role for Escherichia coli RecA protein in SOS mutagenesis.

Induction of the Escherichia coli SOS system increases the ability of the cells to perform DNA repair and mutagenesis. Previous work has shown that this increased mutagenesis is the result of derepression of specific genes through a complex regulatory mechanism controlled by LexA and RecA proteins. One role of RecA protein in this process is to facilitate proteolytic cleavage of LexA protein (the repressor) in response to an inducing signal that reversibly activates RecA protein to perform this function. We show that activated RecA protein plays a second role in SOS mutagenesis, as revealed by analyzing repair of UV-damaged phage lambda in host mutants with alterations in the SOS regulatory system. First, phage mutagenesis was not expressed constitutively in a mutant that is derepressed through lack of functional LexA protein; activated RecA protein was still required. Second, phage mutagenesis was constitutively expressed in the presence of recA mutations that alter RecA protein so that it is activated in normally growing cells. There was also RecA-dependent constitutive expression of SOS mutagenesis in host mutants that lack functional LexA protein and carry plasmids. We discuss several possible biochemical mechanisms for this second role of activated RecA protein in SOS mutagenesis.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1982

Read-through transcription from a derepressed Tn3 promoter affects ColE1 functions on a ColE1::Tn3 composite plasmid.

Mutations in the repressor encoded by the transposon Tn3 tnpR gene lead to increased levels of expression of two gene products: the mutant repressor (TnpR-) and the Tn3 encoded transposase, TnpA (Heffron et al. 1978; Chou et al. 1979a). Derivatives of the ColE1::Tn3 composite plasmid, RSF2124, with mutant Tn3 repressor exhibited the expected elevated levels of transposition. Unexpectedly, hosts containing these tnpR- derivatives produced enhanced levels of the ColE1 encoded toxin, colicin E1. The gene for colicin E1 maps far (0.23-0.98 MU) from the Tn3 insertion point (0.73 MU) (Fig. 1). The colicin E1 overproduction phenotype, designated Eop-, was complemented in trans by wild type repressor gene product (TnpR+) to the wild type phenotype, Eop+. Hosts with RSF2124 derivatives which expressed high levels of both mutant repressor and mutant transposase (TnpR-, TnpA-) were Eop-. Hosts containing plasmids deleted for both tnpA and tnpR promoters were Eop+, while hosts with plasmids carrying a lac promoter substitution for the tnpA promoter were Eop-. These data support the idea that a cis-acting effect of increased transcription from the tnpA promoter into adjacent ColE1 DNA was the cause of colicin overproduction. Increased transcription activated a putative colicin augmentation function (caf) whose presence was required for the Eop- phenotype. Deletion mapping established that one boundary of the caf locus lies within 52 bases of the junction of the left end of Tn3 and ColE1 DNA. ColE1 DNA in this area contains an open reading frame which could encode either a 74 or a 63 residue protein (B. Polisky, unpublished DNA sequence data). The presence of increased levels of an mRNA transcript from this region and/or the increased expression of protein(s) from this transcript could result in an Eop- phenotype. Expression of the Eop- phenotype requires the presence of the host recE gene. Evidence is presented which suggests that the recA repressor, lexA protein, controls expression of the recE gene product, ExoVIII.

Cloning, Molecular↗
PubMed1986

Information content of binding sites on nucleotide sequences.

Repressors, polymerases, ribosomes and other macromolecules bind to specific nucleic acid sequences. They can find a binding site only if the sequence has a recognizable pattern. We define a measure of the information (R sequence) in the sequence patterns at binding sites. It allows one to investigate how information is distributed across the sites and to compare one site to another. One can also calculate the amount of information (R frequency) that would be required to locate the sites, given that they occur with some frequency in the genome. Several Escherichia coli binding sites were analyzed using these two independent empirical measurements. The two amounts of information are similar for most of the sites we analyzed. In contrast, bacteriophage T7 RNA polymerase binding sites contain about twice as much information as is necessary for recognition by the T7 polymerase, suggesting that a second protein may bind at T7 promoters. The extra information can be accounted for by a strong symmetry element found at the T7 promoters. This element may be an operator. If this model is correct, these promoters and operators do not share much information. The comparisons between R sequence and R frequency suggest that the information at binding sites is just sufficient for the sites to be distinguished from the rest of the genome.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1984

Regulation and SOS induction of division inhibition in Escherichia coli K12.

When Escherichia coli is subjected to treatments that damage DNA or perturb DNA replication considerable cell filamentation occurs. It has been postulated that this phenomenon is associated with the presence of a division inhibitor induced coordinately with the SOS functions. The role of this induction would be to delay septation during DNA repair to prevent the formation of DNAless cells. In this communication, we present evidence for such a division inhibitor based on the properties of a division mutant which is hyperactive in the septation delay. Cells of this mutant filament extensively after a nutritional shift-up, have drastically reduced colony-forming abilities on a rich medium but not on a minimal medium following treatment with ultraviolet radiation and, are deficient in the lysogenization of phage lambda; phenotypes which are characteristic of but expressed to a much lower extent in another type of division mutant called Ion. Cells harboring the division mutation plus either one of the lexA mutant alleles, spr-51 or tsl-1, are filamentous suggesting that they are permanently derepressed for division inhibition. These results are in agreement with models that assign the regulation of cell division to a division inhibitor which is regulated by the lexA repressor protein.

Bacteriophage lambda↗
PubMed1985

Viability of Escherichia coli K-12 DNA adenine methylase (dam) mutants requires increased expression of specific genes in the SOS regulon.

We have examined the level of expression of the SOS regulon in cells lacking DNA adenine methylase activity (dam-). Mud (Ap, lac) fusions to several SOS operons (recA, lexA, uvrA, uvrB, uvrD, sulA, dinD and dinF) were found to express higher levels of beta-galactosidase in dam- strains than in isogenic dam+ strains. The attempted construction of dam- strains that were also mutant in one of several SOS genes indicated that the viability of methylase-deficient strains correlates with the inactivation of the SOS repressor (LexA protein). Consistent with this, the wild-type functions of two LexA-repressed genes (recA and ruv) appear to be required for dam- strain viability.

DNA Repair↗
PubMed1991

Self-cleaving proteases.

Research on the activity of self-cleaving proteases in bacterial, mammalian and virus-infected cells is reviewed, with an emphasis on the diversity of regulatory systems controlled by protein processing. Each of these three groups will be considered in turn by focusing on the following systems: the Rec A-dependent intramolecular cleavage of the Escherichia coli SOS response protein, LexA; the intramolecular activation of the mammalian aspartic acid protease, pepsinogen; and the autocatalytic cleavage of polyproteins synthesized by picornaviruses.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1989

Identification of the operator of the lux regulon from the Vibrio fischeri strain ATCC7744.

Escherichia coli that carry a recombinant plasmid bearing the Vibrio fischeri lux regulon express luminescence that mimics the luminescence of V. fischeri. The lux regulon consists of two divergently transcribed operons, the rightward operon (luxICDABE genes) and the leftward operon (luxR gene). The luxR and luxI genes and the control region separating the two operons supply the primary regulatory control over the lux regulon; the regulatory mechanisms result in a dramatic increase in the rate of luciferase synthesis after induction, apparently due to a unique autoregulatory positive feedback mechanism, and in an enormous difference (greater than 10(4] in levels of luminescence in cells before and after induction. The generally accepted model of primary regulation of bioluminescence in V. fischeri involves the interaction of the product of the luxR gene and N-(3-oxohexanoyl)homoserine lactone, the autoinducer produced by the enzyme encoded by luxI, the first gene of the rightward operon, with an operator sequence within the control region to stimulate transcription of the rightward operon in a positive feedback loop. We have used deletion mapping of a transcription reporter vector to determine the approximate location of the operator. By site-directed mutagenesis of the presumed operator, we have demonstrated that the 20-base-pair inverted repeat ACCTGTAGGA/TCGTA CAGGT (where the vertical line is the center of symmetry), which bears striking similarity to the recognition sequence for the pleiotropic repressor protein LexA, is the operator of the lux regulon. We also found that deletion of sequences upstream of the palindrome leads to increased transcription from the rightward promoter (PR), indicative of a cis-acting element that represses transcription in the absence of the LuxR-autoinducer complex. Modifications of the palindrome that eliminate stimulation by LuxR-autoinducer of transcription from PR have no effect on repression by the cis-acting mechanism(s), suggesting that the palindrome is not necessary for repression of the rightward operon. Thus, it appears that the large increase in transcription upon induction of the lux regulon is the result of at least two independent mechanisms, one positive and the other negative.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1980

Cleavage of the Escherichia coli lexA protein by the recA protease.

The recA and lexA proteins of EScherichia coli are involved in a complex regulatory circuit that allows the expression of a diverse set of functions after DNA damage or inhibition of DNA replication. Exponentially growing cells contain a low level of recA protein, and genetic evidence suggests that lexA protein is involved in its regulation, perhaps as a simple repressor. Recent models for recA derepression after DNA damage have suggested that an early event in this process is the proteolytic cleavage of lexA protein, leading to high-level expression of recA. We present several lines of evidence that the specific protease activity of the recA protein, previously described with the lambda repressor as substrate, is capable of cleaving the wild-type lexA+ protein. First, lexA protein can be cleaved in vitro under the same conditions as prevously described for lambda repressor cleavage in a reaction requring both recA protease and ATP or an analogue, adenosine 5'-[lambda-thio]-triphosphate. Second, lexA protein can be observed in vivo as a physical entity after infection with lambda lexA+ transducing phage of host strains containing ittle or no active protease, but not in strains containing high levels of active protease. Finally, infection of host cells containing active protease with a lambda lexA+ transducing phage does not lead to repression of recA, but does so in cells lacking active protease. In all of these conditions the mutant lexA3 protein is largely resistant to inactivation or cleavage; this resistance can explain the dominant phenotype of lexA3 over lexA+. We discuss models for recA derepression and re-establishment of repression which propose that modulation of the protease activity of recA protein regulates both of these transitions.

Adenosine Triphosphatases↗
PubMed1985

Deletions within a hinge region of a specific DNA-binding protein.

Many proteins are organized as a set of compact functional domains connected by flexible, exposed segments of the polypeptide chain. To study one of these connector regions, we isolated a series of functional in-frame deletions in the central portion of a specific DNA-binding protein, the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli. These mutant proteins fell into two main classes: those with small deletions of two to eight amino acids functioned as repressor about as well as did wild type, while those with large deletions of 17-22 amino acids functioned well only at considerably higher concentrations. The mutant proteins were resistant to the specific cleavage reaction that triggers the SOS response. These data suggest that the conformation of the hinge region in LexA protein is important for cleavage. By contrast, the hinge plays a topological role in repressor function, connecting the two functional halves of the protein; in the SOS response, this function of the hinge is inactivated by cleavage, leading to inactivation of the repressor.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1986

In vitro study of the interaction of the LexA repressor and the UvrC protein with a uvrC regulatory region.

The in vitro interaction of the LexA repressor with a regulatory region of the uvrC gene has been studied by polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis. Although the uvrC promoter region shows some homology with the canonic LexA binding site, no specific binding of the repressor to this DNA sequence could be observed, but only a cooperative nonspecific binding. By the same technique we show that the UvrC protein does not bind specifically to this regulatory DNA sequence either, although the protein is able to bind nonspecifically and cooperatively to the double-stranded DNA fragment.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1991

MAT alpha 1 can mediate gene activation by a-mating factor.

In the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae, expression of alpha-specific genes is governed by the MAT alpha 1 and MCM1 gene products. MAT alpha 1 and MCM1 bind cooperatively to PQ elements upstream of alpha-specific genes. The PQ element not only directs alpha-specific expression but can also direct gene induction in response to treatment with a-mating pheromone. We have used gene fusions to investigate whether induction conferred by the PQ box is mediated through either MAT alpha 1 or MCM1, or a combination of both. When MCM1 is fused to the DNA-binding domain of the bacterial repressor LexA, this fusion protein is capable of trans-activating a lacZ reporter gene driven by a LexA operator. However, the transcriptional activity of the MCM1-LexA fusion is not further enhanced by treatment of cells with a-factor. A MAT alpha 1-LexA fusion protein is also capable of trans-activation through a LexA operator. Moreover, the activity of the MAT alpha 1-LexA fusion protein can be further induced by treatment with a-factor. When progressive deletions are made from the amino terminus of MAT alpha 1 in the fusion protein, the basal level of trans-activation progressively decreases, but the inducibility of the fusion protein increases. MAT alpha 1-LexA fusion proteins, which have greater than or equal to 57 amino acids deleted from the amino terminus of MAT alpha 1 are not capable of trans-activation. In addition, the activity of the MAT alpha 1-LexA fusion protein is dependent on the functions of the STE7, STE11, and STE12 genes that encode components of the pheromone response pathway.

Amino Acid Sequence↗
PubMed1991

The role of electrostatic interactions in the mechanism of peptide bond hydrolysis by a Ser-Lys catalytic dyad.

General-base catalysis in the active site of serine proteases is carried out by the imidazole side chain of a histidine. During formation of the transition state, an adjacent carboxylic acid group stabilizes the positive charge that forms on the general-base catalyst and as a result contributes several orders of magnitude to the catalytic efficiency of these enzymes. In the recently discovered family of self-cleaving proteins exemplified by the LexA repressor of Escherichia coli, instead of the imidazole of a histidine, the active-site general-base catalyst was found to be the epsilon-amino of a lysine. The considerably higher capacity of the lysine side chain for proton acceptance raises interesting questions concerning the role of electrostatic interactions in the mechanism of proton transfer by this highly basic group. The negative charge elimination studies described here and their effects on the kmax and pK of LexA self-cleavage are consistent with a model in which electrostatic interactions between an acidic side chain and the general-base catalyst form a barrier to proton transfer. The implications are that the epsilon-amino group, unlike the imidazole group, is capable of effecting proton transfer without the intervention of a countercharge.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1986

In vitro binding of LexA repressor to DNA: evidence for the involvement of the amino-terminal domain.

Both the amino-terminal and the carboxy-terminal domain of the LexA repressor have been purified using the LexA protein autodigestion reaction at alkaline pH, which leads to the same specific products as the physiological RecA-catalyzed proteolysis of repressor. We show by circular dichroism (c.d) that, upon non-specific binding to DNA, the purified amino-terminal domain induces a very similar if not identical conformational change of the DNA as does the entire repressor. The positive c.d. signal increases approximately 3-fold if the DNA lattice is fully saturated with protein. Further, the amino-terminal domain of the LexA protein binds specifically to the operator of the recA gene, producing qualitatively the same effects on the methylation pattern of the guanine bases by dimethylsulfate as the entire repressor, consisting of a methylation inhibition effect at four distal operator guanines and a slight enhancement at the central bases. The spacing between these contacts suggests that LexA does not bind to the operator along the same face of the DNA helix. As shown by c.d. studies the amino-terminal domain harbours a substantial amount of residues in alpha-helical conformation, a prerequisite for DNA recognition via a helix--turn--helix structural motif as proposed for many other regulatory proteins.

Bacterial Proteins↗
PubMed1992

Genetic identification of the DNA binding domain of Escherichia coli LexA protein.

Two genetic approaches were taken to define the DNA binding domain of LexA protein, the repressor of the Escherichia coli SOS regulon. First, several dominant negative lexA mutants defective in DNA binding were isolated. The mutations altered amino acids in a region similar to the helix-turn-helix, a DNA binding domain of other repressors and DNA binding proteins. Second, the region encoding the predicted DNA recognition helix was subjected to oligonucleotide-directed mutagenesis and mutant LexA proteins with altered or relaxed specificity for several recA operator positions were isolated. By examining the effects of a series of amino acid substitutions on repressor specificity, it was shown that a glutamic acid residue at position 45 in LexA protein is important for recognition of the first base pair (G.C) in the recA operator.

Amino Acid Sequence↗