SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “MEGESTROL”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMedDate not supplied

Deep vein thrombosis as a complication of megestrol acetate therapy among nursing home residents.

OBJECTIVES: To describe a cluster of cases of proximal deep vein thrombosis among nursing home residents treated with megestrol acetate, to identify other risk factors for deep vein thrombosis development among these patients, and to alert physicians to this potential complication of megestrol acetate therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective review. SETTING: A 129-bed Maryland nursing home. PARTICIPANTS: Nineteen residents prescribed megestrol acetate between November 1997 July 1998, identified by computerized pharmacy records. MEASUREMENTS: Demographic data (including identification of known risk factors for deep vein thrombosis development) were collected along with information on the indications for megestrol acetate therapy and its duration, diagnostic studies related to detection of deep vein thrombosis and their results, and patient outcomes following diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis. RESULTS: Megestrol acetate was prescribed for 18 nutritionally at-risk patients and one with uterine cancer. Six (32%) patients developed deep vein thrombosis signs and symptoms, and all diagnoses were confirmed as proximal deep vein thromboses with Doppler studies. (No diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis were made among any nursing home patients not being treated with megestrol acetate during the observation period.) All patients diagnosed with deep vein thrombosis were hospitalized and anticoagulated, but none were diagnosed with pulmonary embolus or died. The length [median (range)] of megestrol acetate treatment was similar regardless of whether deep vein thrombosis developed [117 (57-244) versus 143 (2-294) days, respectively, P = 0.83]. Stratification by length of treatment in 50-day increments revealed that most patients who developed deep vein thrombosis did so after 50 days of treatment (P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: A high incidence of deep vein thrombosis was identified among nursing home residents treated with megestrol acetate, even among ambulatory individuals with no other known risk factors. Because the efficacy of megestrol acetate treatment in nursing home residents with weight loss is unproven, the risk of deep vein thrombosis must be considered when prescribing megestrol acetate, and its use to treat nutritionally at-risk nursing home residents should be limited.

Journal Article↗

PubMed2003

Acute effects of megestrol on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

BACKGROUND: Clinical observations suggest that prolonged treatment with megestrol can lead to Cushing-like symptoms, while withdrawal of prolonged treatment with megestrol may result in adrenal insufficiency. However, only little is known about the acute effects of megestrol on the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis. As part of an endocrine study, we evaluated the acute effects of megestrol, hydrocortisone and placebo on morning cortisol and ACTH levels. METHOD: . Using a balanced double-blind design, ten healthy male subjects were treated at 11:00 p.m. and 8:00 a.m. with megestrol (total dose 320 mg), hydrocortisone (total dose 30 mg) or placebo. After 1 h of rest, blood was drawn at 10:00 a.m. and 10:30 a.m. for determination of cortisol and ACTH levels. RESULTS: . Compared to placebo, acute administration of megestrol resulted in a significant decrease in morning ACTH and cortisol levels. The suppression of ACTH after pretreatment with megestrol was less pronounced than after pretreatment with hydrocortisone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that megestrol exerts glucocorticoid-like effects and has an acute depressing effect on the HPA axis. Therefore alterations in the steroid system should be included in the differential diagnosis of all subjects under treatment with megestrol.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗

PubMed1997

A phase III trial comparing anastrozole (1 and 10 milligrams), a potent and selective aromatase inhibitor, with megestrol acetate in postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma. Arimidex Study Group.

BACKGROUND: Anastrozole is a new oral aromatase inhibitor with highly potent and selective activity for the aromatase enzyme. In a Phase III trial, the efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole, given in doses of 1 and 10 mg orally once daily, and megestrol acetate, given in doses of 40 mg orally 4 times daily, were compared in 386 postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma who progressed after tamoxifen therapy. METHODS: The trial was randomized, double blind for anastrozole, open label for megestrol acetate, parallel group, and multicenter. Patients were randomly assigned to receive anastrozole, 1 mg (n = 128); anastrozole, 10 mg (n = 130); or megestrol acetate (n = 128). The primary efficacy measures were time to progression and tumor response; secondary measures were time to treatment failure, duration of response, quality of life, and time to death. RESULTS: With a median duration of follow-up of 6 months, there was no statistical evidence of a difference between either 1 or 10 mg doses of anastrozole and megestrol acetate for any efficacy endpoint. According to rigid response criteria, 10%, 6%, and 6% of patients in the anastrozole 1 mg, anastrozole 10 mg, and megestrol acetate groups, respectively, had an objective response (complete response or partial response) and 27%, 24%, and 30% of patients in the respective groups had stable disease for a duration of 24 weeks or longer. Quality-of-life assessments revealed that anastrozole in a 1-mg dose was associated with better physical scores and anastrozole in a 10-mg dose with better psychologic scores than megestrol acetate. Both anastrozole and megestrol acetate were generally well tolerated. Among anticipated adverse events, gastrointestinal disturbance was more common among patients in the anastrozole groups, whereas weight gain occurred more frequently among patients in the megestrol acetate groups. Weight increases of 5% or more and 10% or more were more common among megestrol acetate-treated patients; moreover, patients in this group continued to gain weight over time. CONCLUSIONS: Anastrozole, given in doses of 1 and 10 mg once daily, represents a well tolerated and effective therapeutic option for the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma who progress after tamoxifen treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Megestrol acetate in neoplastic anorexia/cachexia: clinical evaluation and comparison with cytokine levels in patients with head and neck carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

The aim of our study (clinical phase II open pilot study) was to evaluate the toxicity of megestrol acetate and its ability to increase appetite and body weight in patients with advanced-stage (III-IV) primary head and neck squamous cell carcinoma treated with neoadjuvant (primary) chemotherapy. Serum levels of interleukin-1 alpha and beta, interleukin-2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and the soluble receptor for interleukin-2 were evaluated before and after megestrol acetate treatment. The same cytokines and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were also measured in culture medium of peripheral blood lymphocytes from the same patients after stimulation with phytohemagglutinin. From April 1993 to February 1994, 11 male patients were enrolled in our study: their mean age was 57.8 years (range 43-69 years). Megestrol acetate was administered at a dose of 320 mg/day in the interval between chemotherapeutic cycles for a total of three consecutive cycles; 9 of the 11 patients could be evaluated (81.8%). Except for the performance status according to Karnofsky, all parameters were increased after megestrol acetate treatment. The average weight increased by 6.3 kg (13.2%), appetite by a score of 2.4 (38.6%) and the Spitzer's quality of life index by a score of 2.4 (36.2%). The performance status according to Karnofsky decreased in only 1 patient, remained the same in most patients, and in 2 patients was slightly improved. No significant side effects were observed during treatment. Serum levels of interleukin-1 alpha and beta, interleukin-2 and 6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha, and soluble interleukin-2 receptor were significantly higher than in normal subjects, prior to treatment with megestrol acetate. These levels dropped after megestrol acetate treatment with a statistically significant decrease for interleukin-1 alpha and beta and tumor necrosis factor-alpha. There were no significant differences in the production of cytokines by peripheral blood lymphocytes stimulated with phytohemagglutinin from patients before megestrol acetate treatment and normal subjects, with the exception of interleukin-6 (higher in patients) and of soluble interleukin-2 receptor (lower in patients). There was no significant difference in the cytokines and soluble interleukin-2 receptor produced in culture before and after megestrol acetate treatment, except for interleukin-6 which decreased after treatment.

Adult↗

PubMed1990

Controlled trial of megestrol acetate for the treatment of cancer anorexia and cachexia.

Preliminary information has suggested that megestrol acetate leads to appetite stimulation and nonfluid weight gain in patients with breast cancer, other cancers, and AIDS. Pursuant to this, we developed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of megestrol acetate in patients with cancer-associated anorexia and cachexia. We randomly assigned 133 eligible patients to receive 800 mg of megestrol acetate per day or a placebo. Patients assigned to megestrol acetate more frequently reported improved appetite (P = .003) and food intake (P = .009) when compared with patients receiving the placebo. A weight gain of 15 lb or more over baseline was seen in 11 of 67 (16%) patients receiving megestrol acetate compared with one of 66 (2%) given the placebo (P = .003). Patients receiving megestrol acetate reported significantly less nausea (13% vs. 38%; P = .001) and emesis (8% vs. 25%, P = .009). No clinically or statistically significant toxic reactions were ascribed to megestrol acetate, with the exception of mild edema. This study convincingly demonstrated that megestrol acetate can stimulate appetite and food intake in patients with anorexia and cachexia associated with cancer, leading to significant weight gain in a proportion of such patients.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial of cisplatin and etoposide plus megestrol acetate/placebo in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.

PURPOSE: Megestrol acetate has been reported to improve appetite and quality of life and to decrease nausea and vomiting in patients with cancer anorexia/cachexia. The present trial was formulated to evaluate the impact of megestrol acetate on quality of life, toxicity, response, and survival in individuals with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer who received concomitant chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive megestrol acetate 800 mg/d orally or placebo. In addition, all patients were scheduled to receive a maximum of four cycles of cisplatin and etoposide chemotherapy. Quality of life was self-assessed at entry onto study, with every cycle of chemotherapy, and 4 months thereafter with a linear visual analog scale. Toxicity was evaluated by patient questionnaire and investigator reports. RESULTS: A total of 243 eligible patients were randomized. Those who received megestrol acetate had increased nonfluid weight gain (P = .004) and significantly less nausea (P = .0002) and vomiting (P = .02). Significant thromboembolic phenomena occurred more often in patients who received megestrol acetate versus placebo (9% v 2%, P = .01). Patients who received megestrol acetate had more edema (30% v 20%, P = .002), an inferior response rate to chemotherapy (68% v 80%, P = .03), and a trend for inferior survival duration (median, 8.2 v 10.0 months, P = .49). These findings may have been influenced by a poorer quality of life of the megestrol acetate group at study initiation. There were no significant changes in quality of life scores over time between either of the study arms. CONCLUSION: Megestrol acetate cannot be routinely recommended for all patients with small-cell lung cancer at the time of chemotherapy initiation. Rather, its therapeutic ratio may be more favorable for patients with problematic cancer anorexia/cachexia.

Anorexia↗

PubMed1994

Megestrol acetate in patients with AIDS and cachexia.

OBJECTIVE: To study the effects of a megestrol acetate liquid formulation (800 mg/d) on body weight, body composition, caloric intake, and mental outlook in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS) who had cachexia. DESIGN: Twelve-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. SETTING: Multiple clinical centers. PATIENTS: 100 patients with AIDS who had weight loss of 10% or more of ideal body weight were randomly assigned to placebo (n = 48) or megestrol acetate (n = 52). MEASUREMENTS: Caloric intake, body weight, body composition, and sense of well-being. RESULTS: Most patients receiving megestrol acetate had increased caloric intake resulting in body weight gain (mainly fat mass). From baseline to week 8, the megestrol acetate group increased their daily caloric intake by 608 calories, whereas the placebo group increased intake by 134 calories (difference, 474 calories; 95% CI, -68 to 880 calories). Body weight in the megestrol acetate group increased by 3.86 kg from baseline to week 8, although it decreased by 0.46 kg in the placebo group (difference, 4.32 kg; CI, 2.42 to 6.22 kg). At week 8 in the megestrol acetate group, patients gained 3.68 kg in fat mass and those in the placebo group lost 0.28 kg (difference, 3.96 kg; CI, 2.49 to 5.43 kg). Body water, lean mass, and patient survival were not statistically different between treatment groups. Patients treated with megestrol acetate had an increased sense of well-being when compared with patients who received placebo. CONCLUSIONS: This megestrol acetate liquid formulation is well tolerated, increases food intake, results in body weight gain, and improves the sense of well-being in cachectic patients with AIDS.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1990

Megestrol acetate for treatment of anorexia and cachexia associated with human immunodeficiency virus infection.

Cachexia is a common problem in persons infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Megestrol acetate, an agent used for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer, is associated with appetite stimulation and weight gain. To determine whether this drug might benefit HIV-positive patients, 22 such subjects (14 previously reported) were treated with oral megestrol acetate, beginning at a dose of 80 mg four times daily. All patients had lost at least 10% of their preillness weight prior to treatment; the median loss was 11.4 kg (range, 5.5 to 26.8). Preliminary data from patients observed during therapy from 2 to 72 weeks showed that 21 of the 22 patients gained weight; the average weight gain was 7.3 kg (range, -4.1 to 17.3). Three patients failed to gain weight on 320 mg per day of megestrol acetate; both appetite stimulation and weight gain were achieved with 460 mg per day in one and 640 mg per day in another. One patient continued to lose weight despite 480 mg per day megestrol acetate. The median time to peak weight during megestrol acetate treatment was 14 weeks. Seven patients returned to within 1 kg of their normal body weight. In three of the 22 patients treated, megestrol acetate and zidovudine were started simultaneously. For these three patients, weight gain was potentially due to the recognized weight gain associated with the initiation of zidovudine. For the remaining 18 patients, however, appetite stimulation and weight gain were a result of megestrol acetate. All patients tolerated the drug well. One patient developed a deep vein thrombosis. No patient developed peripheral edema or drug-related impotence. The appetite improvement and weight gain seen in this initial series are encouraging. The true effectiveness of megestrol acetate for HIV-related cachexia and the effects of treatment on quality of life are currently being assessed in a national prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.

Acquired Immunodeficiency Syndrome↗

PubMed1986

High-dose megestrol acetate therapy of ovarian carcinoma: a phase II study by the Northern California Oncology Group.

The activity of high-dose megestrol acetate was studied in 47 patients with epithelial ovarian cancers after failure of initial chemotherapy. The dose of megestrol acetate was 800 mg/d orally (PO) for 4 weeks and then 400 mg/d until tumor progression. Patients generally had far-advanced disease. Prior therapy included cisplatin, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (PAC) or other cisplatin-containing regimens in 37, other combinations in eight, and single agents in only two patients. Seventeen patients (36%) developed intestinal obstructions within the first 2 months on study. Tumor histology was serous in 37, endometrioid in six, and clear-cell in two. Two thirds of the tumors were histologic grade 3, and the others were grade 2. Complete remission was obtained in one patient, with time to progression of 4 months. There were three partial remissions, with times to progression of 4, 5, and 18 months. The overall response rate (complete and partial) was 8%. Three additional patients had minor remissions (3, 5, and 8 months), and five had stable disease, for 3, 4, 5, 6, and 9 months. There was no correlation of response with grade, histologic type, or site of disease, but responding patients had a longer survival from diagnosis to protocol entry and from protocol failure to death than did nonresponding patients. The major side effect of megestrol acetate was increased appetite, which caused one patient to withdraw from the study, and resulted in a 10- to 20-kg weight gain in five patients. Plasma levels of megestrol acetate averaged 600 ng/mL in the first month of therapy and decreased to approximately 400 ng/mL at 8 and 12 weeks, after the drug dosage had been reduced. Serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels were markedly lower during megestrol therapy compared with pretreatment values. Megestrol acetate at 1 microgram/mL in vitro inhibited soft agar colony formation from one of 17 specimens of ovarian carcinomas. We conclude that megestrol acetate in high doses has modest, but definite, palliative effects in some patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma in whom chemotherapy has failed. A controlled trial of megestrol plus combination chemotherapy as first-line treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma should be considered.

Adult↗

PubMed1996

Sensitization to doxorubicin resistance in breast cancer cell lines by tamoxifen and megestrol acetate.

Acquired drug resistance is a major factor in the failure of doxorubicin-based chemotherapy in breast cancer. We determined the ability of megestrol acetate and/or tamoxifen to reverse doxorubicin drug resistance in a doxorubicin-resistant breast cancer line (the human MCF-7/ADR). The cytotoxicity of doxorubicin, megestrol acetate, and/or tamoxifen was determined in the sensitive and resistant cell lines utilizing the sulphorhodamine B assay. Tamoxifen alone produced an IC50 (concentration resulting in 50% inhibition of control growth) of 10.6 microM, whereas megestrol acetate alone resulted in an IC50 of 48.7 microM in the MCF-7/ADR cell line. The IC50 of doxorubicin in MCF-7/ADR was 1.9 microM. Neither megestrol acetate alone nor tamoxifen alone at 1 or 5 microM altered the IC50 of doxorubicin. However, the combination of tamoxifen (1 or 5 microM) and megestrol acetate (1 or 5 microM) synergistically sensitized MCF-7/ADR cells. Additionally, megestrol acetate and tamoxifen inhibited iodoarylazidoprazosin binding to P-glycoprotein, and, in their presence, there was an increased doxorubicin accumulation in the MCF-7/ADR cells. Furthermore, the combination of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate had much less effect on the cytotoxicity of doxorubicin in MCF-7 wild-type cells. Clinically achievable concentrations of tamoxifen and megestrol acetate can largely sensitize MCF-7/ADR to doxorubicin. The combination of these three drugs in a clinical trial may be informative.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1999

A prospective randomized study of megestrol acetate and ibuprofen in gastrointestinal cancer patients with weight loss.

The use of megestrol acetate in the treatment of weight loss in gastrointestinal cancer patients has been disappointing. The aim of the present study was to compare the combination of megestrol acetate and placebo with megestrol acetate and ibuprofen in the treatment of weight loss in such patients. At baseline, 4-6 weeks and 12 weeks, patients underwent measurements of anthropometry, concentrations of albumin and C-reactive protein and assessment of appetite, performance status and quality of life using EuroQol-EQ-5D and EORTC QLQ-C30. Thirty-eight and 35 patients (median weight loss 18%) were randomized to megestrol acetate/placebo or megestrol acetate/ibuprofen, respectively, for 12 weeks. Forty-six (63%) of patients failed to complete the 12-week assessment. Of those evaluable at 12 weeks, there was a decrease in weight (median 2.8 kg) in the megestrol acetate/placebo group compared with an increase (median 2.3 kg) in the megestrol acetate/ibuprofen group (P<0.001). There was also an improvement in the EuroQol-EQ-5D quality of life scores of the latter group (P<0.05). The combination of megestrol acetate/ibuprofen appeared to reverse weight loss and appeared to improve quality of life in patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Further trials of this novel regimen in weight-losing patients with hormone-insensitive cancers are warranted.

Aged↗

PubMed1970

Investigations into the mechanism of the antifertility action of minimal doses of megestrol acetate in the rabbit.

1. Experiments have been performed to investigate the mechanism by which low doses of megestrol acetate have an antifertility action.2. It was found that the dose of megestrol acetate required to prevent pregnancy in nine of ten New Zealand White rabbits when given on 3 consecutive days, the last of which was the day of insemination, was 50 mug/kg daily.3. This treatment reduced the numbers of sperm recoverable from the uterus at various times after insemination, but egg transfer experiments showed that neither egg viability nor fertilization was affected on day 1 of pregnancy.4. Treatment with megestrol acetate for 3 days caused the fertilized eggs to enter the uterus approximately 48 h prematurely. Treatment with megestrol acetate for longer periods caused a similar but more marked increase in the rate of transport of eggs in the oviduct.5. Megestrol acetate did not modify oviduct opening pressure, but the volume of oviduct fluid secretion was reduced earlier and transport of fluid through the oviduct was accelerated compared with controls.6. Transfer of eggs on various days from the uteri of untreated rabbits to the uteri of treated rabbits indicated that the development of the endometrium which occurs in pregnancy may be advanced by megestrol administration. Histological examination of the endometrial proliferation induced by megestrol acetate confirmed that this was so.7. It is concluded that the antifertility action of megestrol acetate in doses that do not necessarily inhibit ovulation is due to a combination of accelerated egg transport and advanced endometrial development.

Animals↗

PubMed2002

Dronabinol versus megestrol acetate versus combination therapy for cancer-associated anorexia: a North Central Cancer Treatment Group study.

PURPOSE: To determine whether dronabinol administered alone or with megestrol acetate was more, less, or equal in efficacy to single-agent megestrol acetate for palliating cancer-associated anorexia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred sixty-nine assessable advanced cancer patients were randomized to (1) oral megestrol acetate 800 mg/d liquid suspension plus placebo, (2) oral dronabinol 2.5 mg twice a day plus placebo, or (3) both agents. Eligible patients acknowledged that loss of appetite or weight was a problem and reported the loss of 5 pounds or more during 2 months and/or a daily intake of less than 20 calories/kg of body weight. RESULTS: Groups were comparable at baseline in age, sex, tumor type, weight loss, and performance status. A greater percentage of megestrol acetate-treated patients reported appetite improvement and weight gain compared with dronabinol-treated patients: 75% versus 49% (P =.0001) for appetite and 11% versus 3% (P =.02) for > or = 10% baseline weight gain. Combination treatment resulted in no significant differences in appetite or weight compared with megestrol acetate alone. The Functional Assessment of Anorexia/Cachexia Therapy questionnaire, which emphasizes anorexia-related questions, demonstrated an improvement in quality of life (QOL) among megestrol acetate-treated and combination-treated patients. The single-item Uniscale, a global QOL instrument, found comparable scores. Toxicity was also comparable, with the exception of an increased incidence of impotence among men who received megestrol acetate. CONCLUSION: In the doses and schedules we studied, megestrol acetate provided superior anorexia palliation among advanced cancer patients compared with dronabinol alone. Combination therapy did not appear to confer additional benefit.

Administration, Oral↗

PubMed1996

[Supportive treatment with megestrol acetate during radio(chemo)therapy in patients with tumors in the head-neck area. A randomized study].

BACKGROUND: The value of megestrol acetate in treating tumor anorexia and cachexia of terminal patients is well known. However, the supportive effect of megestrol acetate during intensive radio-(chemo-)therapy was not investigated up to now. Therefore a randomized trial was performed including patients with advanced tumors in the head and neck region. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From June 1991 to December 1993 a total of 64 patients were admitted to a randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled study. During and up to 6 weeks following radiotherapy patients received 160 mg/d megestrol acetate or placebo. The nutritional status (anthropometric and laboratory parameters) and the quality-of-life index according to Padilla et al. [24] were determined prior to therapy, 1, 4, 6 weeks later during radiotherapy and 12, 18 weeks after completion. RESULTS: Sixty-one out of 64 patients were evaluable (control group: n = 30; megestrol acetate patients: n = 31). One patient refused further participation after randomization. One patient in each arm was excluded due to side effects (impotence, diarrhoea). Further side effects were not observed. In the control group the nutritional parameters (body weight, triceps skinfold) and the subjective feeling of the patients deteriorated during radiotherapy and did not restore following radiotherapy. By contrast, the patients of the megestrol acetate group were able to stabilize these parameters. This difference was most prominent in the orally nourished patients (weight loss during therapy: control group: -4.1 kg; megestrol acetate group: -0.8 kg; p = 0.004); but not in the patients fed by percutaneous endoscopically guided gastrostomy (weight loss control group: -2.4 kg; megestrol acetate group: -0.8 kg; p = 0.14). CONCLUSION: In patients on radiochemotherapy megestrol acetate prevents patients from further deterioration of the nutritional status and quality of life.

Anthropometry↗

PubMed1998

Long term use of megestrol acetate by cancer survivors for the treatment of hot flashes.

BACKGROUND: Hot flashes are often a troublesome symptom in breast carcinoma survivors and men with prostate carcinoma who have undergone androgen deprivation therapy. A previous clinical study demonstrated that, on a short term basis, low dose megestrol acetate markedly reduced hot flashes and was well tolerated. Little information has been available regarding the long term use of low dose megestrol acetate for hot flashes. METHODS: Patients previously enrolled on a randomized placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the short term use of megestrol acetate for hot flashes were contacted and interviewed by telephone. RESULTS: A total of 132 persons were contacted. Nine percent of the patients discontinued megestrol acetate after resolution of their hot flashes. Forty-five percent of the patients contacted were continuing to utilize megestrol acetate approximately 3 years beyond the conclusion of the 1992 study. Three-quarters of these patients were utilizing < or =20 mg of megestrol acetate per day. Potential toxicities attributed to megestrol acetate included episodes of chills, appetite stimulation/weight gain, vaginal bleeding, and carpal tunnel syndrome symptoms. CONCLUSIONS: A substantial proportion of patients continue to use megestrol acetate for periods of up to 3 years or longer with continued control of hot flashes. This treatment appears to be relatively well tolerated.

Breast Neoplasms↗

PubMed1998

Anastrozole versus megestrol acetate in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma: results of a survival update based on a combined analysis of data from two mature phase III trials. Arimidex Study Group.

BACKGROUND: This report presents the results of a survival update based on the combined data from two studies that compared the efficacy and tolerability of anastrozole (1 or 10 mg once daily), a selective, nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitor administered orally, and megestrol acetate (40 mg 4 times daily) in the treatment of postmenopausal women with advanced breast carcinoma whose disease had progressed after treatment with tamoxifen. METHODS: Two randomized, parallel-group, multicenter trials were conducted, involving a total of 764 patients. The two trials were identical in design; both were double blind for anastrozole and open label for megestrol acetate. Overview analyses were conducted with the intent of strengthening the interpretation of results from each trial. The median follow-up duration for this survival update was 31 months. RESULTS: At the clinical dose of 1 mg daily, anastrozole demonstrated a statistically significant survival advantage over megestrol acetate, with a hazard ratio of 0.78 (P < 0.025)(0.60 < 97.5% confidence interval [CI] <1.0). The 1 mg anastrozole group also had a longer median time to death (26.7 months) compared with 22.5 months for the megestrol acetate group. The 10 mg anastrozole group also had a survival benefit over the megestrol acetate group, with a hazard ratio of 0.83 (P=0.09, not significant)(0.64 < 97.5% CI < 1.1). Higher 2-year survival rates were observed for both anastrozole treatment groups than for the megestrol acetate group (56.1%, 54.6%, and 46.3% for the groups given 1 mg anastrozole, 10 mg anastrozole, and megestrol acetate, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This combined analysis of two trials of postmenopausal patients with advanced breast carcinoma has clearly demonstrated that, after disease progression with tamoxifen, treatment with anastrozole 1 mg once daily results in a statistically and clinically significant advantage over a standard treatment, megestrol acetate. This important benefit, in addition to the good tolerability profile of anastrozole, supports the use of this drug as a valuable new treatment option for this patient population.

Aged↗

PubMed2004

Osteoporosis associated with megestrol acetate.

Megestrol acetate is a progestational agent for treatment of metastatic breast cancer and endometrial cancer. Megestrol has also been used as an appetite stimulant for patients with human immunodeficiency virus and malignancy who experience cachexia and wasting; also, megestrol can be beneficial in relieving hot flashes in women and men. Megestrol has been shown to have a glucocorticoidlike effect and has been associated with substantial suppression of plasma estradiol levels. We describe 2 patients who recently presented to our Metabolic Bone Disease Clinic with severe osteoporosis complicated by multiple vertebral fractures experienced while the patients were receiving high-dose megestrol therapy. The patients had evidence of adrenal axis suppression but recovered fully after megestrol was discontinued. We speculate that megestrol was an important factor in the development of osteoporosis and subsequent fractures. Further study is warranted to clarify the relationship between megestrol and its potential for adversely affecting the skeleton.

Aged↗

PubMed1985

Comparison of the actions of RU 38486 and megestrol acetate in the model of a transplantable adrenocorticotropin- and prolactin-secreting rat pituitary tumor.

The effects of the progesterone antagonist RU 38486 and the progesterone agonist megestrol acetate on the growth of the estrogen-progesterone receptor-positive transplantable adrenocorticotropin (ACTH)/prolactin-secreting rat pituitary tumor 7315a were examined. RU 38486 (2.5 mg/kg/day) for 30 days significantly inhibited tumor size, tumor weight, and the plasma prolactin and ACTH concentrations, while the same dose of megestrol acetate only inhibited pituitary tumor weight. Megestrol acetate inhibited both the release and total ACTH content of the anterior pituitary gland, while RU 38486 increased both the release and the total ACTH content. Studies with ACTH secretion by cultured normal rat pituitary cells showed that megestrol acetate (1 microM) did not affect corticotropin-releasing factor (CRF)-stimulated ACTH release after 4-hr exposure, but inhibited CRF-stimulated ACTH release by 50% after 24-hr preincubation. The glucocorticoid-like effect of 1 microM megestrol acetate in this model is similar to that exerted by 10 nM dexamethasone. Acute exposure or preincubation of rat pituitary cells with RU 38486 (1 microM) did not influence CRF-stimulated ACTH release, while preincubation for 24 hr revealed a dose-dependent reversing effect of RU 38486 on dexamethasone-induced inhibition of CRF-stimulated ACTH release. In this model, 1 microM RU 38486 completely overcame the effect of 10 nM dexamethasone. Megestrol acetate and RU 38486 have inhibitory effects on the growth of the 7315a tumor. They differ both with regard to their effects on the progesterone and the glucocorticoid receptor, with megestrol acetate exerting an agonistic and RU 38486 an antagonistic action.

Adenocarcinoma↗