SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “NORTRIPTYLINE”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Inhibition of cytochrome P4502D6 activity with paroxetine normalizes the ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype as measured by nortriptyline pharmacokinetics and the debrisoquin test.

BACKGROUND: The ultrarapid metabolizer phenotype of the cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) enzyme has been considered a relevant cause of nonresponse to antidepressant drug therapy. Prescribing high doses of antidepressants to such patients leads to high concentrations of potentially toxic metabolites and an increased risk for adverse reactions. Normalization of the metabolic status of ultrarapid metabolizers by inhibition of CYP2D6 activity could offer a clinically acceptable method to successfully treat such patients with antidepressants. METHODS: Five ultrarapid metabolizers with a CYP2D6 gene duplication or triplication were treated with 25 mg nortriptyline twice a day for 3 consecutive weeks, alone during the first week and concomitantly with the CYP2D6 inhibitor paroxetine 10 mg or 20 mg twice a day, respectively, during the second and third weeks. After the third week, nortriptyline was discontinued and the subjects were treated with paroxetine 20 mg twice a day during the fourth study week. At the end of each study week, the steady-state pharmacokinetic parameters of nortriptyline or paroxetine were determined within the dose interval. In addition, the CYP2D6 phenotype was determined by debrisoquin (INN, debrisoquine) test at baseline and at the end of each study phase. Treatment-related adverse events were recorded during drug administration and for 1 week thereafter. RESULTS: All 5 subjects had very low (subtherapeutic) nortriptyline concentrations after 7 days' treatment with nortriptyline only. Addition of paroxetine 10 mg twice a day to the nortriptyline regimen resulted in a change in all individuals to the "normal" extensive debrisoquine metabolizer phenotype, and therapeutic plasma nortriptyline concentrations were achieved in 4 of 5 subjects after a 3 times mean increase in nortriptyline trough concentration (P =.0011). Doubling the paroxetine dose caused a 15 times mean increase in paroxetine trough concentration (P <.001), indicating strong inhibition by paroxetine of its own metabolism. The high paroxetine concentrations in 2 subjects caused them to have the poor debrisoquine metabolizer phenotype and resulted in a further increase in plasma nortriptyline trough concentration (P =.0099). A strong correlation (rank correlation coefficient [r(s)] = 0.89; P <.0001) was observed between paroxetine and nortriptyline trough concentrations. Paroxetine also significantly decreased the fluctuation of nortriptyline concentrations within the dose interval. One subject discontinued the study after the second study week because of adverse effects; otherwise, the study drugs were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine, with a daily dosage from 20 to 40 mg, is an effective tool in normalizing the metabolic status of CYP2D6 ultrarapid metabolizers.

Adult↗

PubMed1995

Active hydroxymetabolites of antidepressants. Emphasis on E-10-hydroxy-nortriptyline.

Hydroxymetabolites of the antidepressants nortriptyline and desipramine, like the parent drugs, inhibit neuronal uptake of noradrenaline (norepinephrine). In both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), the concentrations of the 10-hydroxymetabolites of nortriptyline (10-OH-NT) are usually higher than those of the parent drugs, but there is a pronounced interindividual variation in the plasma concentrations. This shows that during treatment with nortriptyline, hydroxymetabolites exert, at least in some patients, major effects on brain noradrenaline neurons. Hydroxymetabolites of antidepressants are formed by the polymorphic cytochrome P450 enzyme CYP2D6. Nortriptyline is hydroxylated by this enzyme in a highly stereospecific way to the (-)-enantiomer of E-10-OH-NT. Among Caucasians, 7% are poor metabolisers of the CYP2D6 probe drug debrisoquine. These patients will form very little hydroxymetabolite. The affinity of E-10-OH-NT for muscarinic acetylcholine receptors in vitro was only one-eighteenth of the affinity of nortriptyline for these receptors. In healthy individuals, nortriptyline decreased saliva flow to a significantly greater extent than either E-10-OH-NT or placebo. In an ultrarapid hydroxylator of nortriptyline treated with very high doses of nortriptyline, the plasma concentration of unconjugated 10-OH-NT was very high without any sign of anticholinergic adverse effects. These results show that hydroxymetabolites of nortriptyline have much less anticholinergic effect than the parent drug. When racemic E-10-OH-NT per se was given to healthy individuals, the plasma concentration of the (-)-enantiomer was 5-fold higher than that of (+)-E-10-OH-NT. The 2 enantiomers were eliminated in parallel with an elimination half-life of 8 to 10 hours. A combined in vitro and in vivo investigation showed that a mean of 64% of (+)-E-10-OH-NT was glucuronidated in the liver and subsequently eliminated in urine. Of the administered (-)-enantiomer, a mean of 36% was eliminated as glucuronide formed in the intestine and 35% was actively secreted as unchanged form in urine. Plasma protein binding, determined by ultrafiltration, of the (+)- and (-)-enantiomers of E-10-OH-NT was 54 and 69%, respectively, which is less than that of nortriptyline (92%). The concentration of E-10-OH-NT in CSF was 50% of the concentration of unbound in plasma. There seems to be a stereoselective active transport of E-10-OH-NT from the CSF to blood. We administered racemic E-10-OH-NT to 5 patients during a major depressive episode.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Blood Proteins↗

PubMed1988

Electrocardiographic changes with nortriptyline and 10-hydroxynortriptyline in elderly depressed outpatients.

Pharmacokinetic factors may contribute to altered nortriptyline effects in the elderly. Plasma concentrations of nortriptyline's principal metabolite, E-10-hydroxynortriptyline, tend to be greater than nortriptyline, increase with age, and may contribute to cardiotoxicity. Electrocardiogram changes were evaluated in 21 ambulatory, elderly, depressed outpatients who were treated with therapeutic doses of nortriptyline. Resting electrocardiograms were obtained before and after 6 weeks of treatment. Plasma samples were assayed simultaneously for nortriptyline, E-, and Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline. Three subjects developed a first degree atrioventricular block and one developed a right bundle branch block during treatment. Mean daily nortriptyline dose and steady state plasma level in these subjects did not differ from those who did not develop conduction defects, but E-10-hydroxynortriptyline levels were significantly higher. Overall, there were significant correlations between changes in the PR interval and QRS duration with plasma concentrations of nortriptyline, E-10-hydroxynortriptyline, Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline, and the sum of nortriptyline and its 10-hydroxynortriptyline metabolites. Multiple regression analyses suggested that increases in PR interval were associated with increasing nortriptyline concentration, while increases in QRS duration and Q-Tc intervals were associated with increasing Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline concentration. E- and Z-10-hydroxynortriptyline may contribute substantially to the cardiac conduction effects of nortriptyline treatment and may be of particular importance in the elderly.

Aged↗

PubMed1999

Nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy as maintenance therapies for recurrent major depression: a randomized controlled trial in patients older than 59 years.

CONTEXT: Elderly patients with major depression are at high risk for recurrence, increased mortality, and chronic disability. OBJECTIVE: To determine the efficacy of maintenance nortriptyline hydrochloride and interpersonal psychotherapy (IPT) in preventing recurrence of major depressive episodes in patients older than 59 years. DESIGN: A 2 x 2 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial, stratified by therapist. SETTING: University-based psychiatric research clinic. PATIENTS: Of a total of 187 patients with recurrent nonpsychotic unipolar major depression (average age, 67 years; one third aged > or =70 years) recruited through clinical referral and media announcements, 107 were fully recovered after open acute and treatment continuation with nortriptyline and IPT. These patients were randomly assigned to 1 of 4 maintenance therapy conditions. INTERVENTIONS: Monthly medication clinic with nortriptyline hydrochloride (80-120 ng/mL steady-state levels) (n = 24); medication clinic with placebo (n = 29); monthly maintenance IPT with placebo (n = 21); and monthly maintenance IPT with nortriptyline (n = 22). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Recurrence of major depressive episode. RESULTS: The time to recurrence of a major depressive episode for all 3 active treatments was significantly better than for placebo. Recurrence rates over 3 years were as follows: nortriptyline and IPT, 20% (95% confidence interval [CI], 4%-36%); nortriptyline and medication clinic visits, 43 % (95% CI, 25%-61%); IPT and placebo, 64% (95% CI, 45%-83%); and placebo and medication clinic visits, 90% (95% CI, 79%-100%). Combined treatment with nortriptyline and IPT was superior to IPT and placebo and showed a trend to superior efficacy over nortriptyline monotherapy (Wald chi2 = 3.56; P = .06). Subjects aged 70 years and older had a higher and more rapid rate of recurrence than those aged 60 to 69 years. CONCLUSION: In geriatric patients with recurrent major depression, maintenance treatment with nortriptyline or IPT is superior to placebo in preventing or delaying recurrence. Combined treatment using both appears to be the optimal clinical strategy in preserving recovery.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

PubMed1977

Quantitative determination of amitriptyline and its principal metabolite, nortriptyline, by GLC-chemical ionization mass spectrometry.

A quantitative GLC-mass spectrometry assay was developed for the determination of the tricyclic antidepressant amitriptyline and its desmethyl metabolite (nortriptyline) in human plasma. The assay utilizes selective ion detection to monitor in a GLC effluent the MH+ molecular ions of amitriptyline and nortriptyline generated by isobutane chemical ionization. The procedure, which utilizes deuterated analogs of amitriptyline and nortriptyline as internal standards, requires 1 ml of plasma and can measure 1 ng/ml of amitriptyline and 0.5 ng/ml of nortriptyline. The curves relating the amounts of amitriptyline and nortriptyline added versus the amounts found over a 100-fold range of amitriptyline and nortriptyline concentrations are straight lines with intercepts of approximately zero and slopes of unity. Analyses of plasma samples from three subjects receiving 50 mg of amitriptyline orally, three times a day, gave an average plasma concentration of 115 +/- 42 ng/ml for amitriptyline and 109 +/- 20 ng/ml for nortriptyline. Similar analyses of the plasma of three subjects who had received a single 50-mg oral dose of amitriptyline showed an average maximum plasma concentration of 25 +/- 10 ng/ml for amitriptyline and 10 +/- 4 ng/ml for nortriptyline. Seventy-two hours after adminis-ration, the average plasma amitriptyline and nortriptyline levels were 3 +/- 2 ng/ml, respectively.

Adult↗

PubMed1982

Nortriptyline metabolism in chronic renal failure: metabolite elimination.

Single oral dose kinetics of nortriptyline and of tis two major metabolites, conjugated and unconjugated 20-hydroxynortriptyline, were studied in eight healthy subjects and 15 patients with chronic renal failure, five of whom were being treated with hemodialysis. Nortriptyline kinetics were unaltered, but the elimination of the metabolites was reduced in both groups of patients. In chronic renal failure the excretion of nortriptyline metabolites appeared to be the rate-limiting step in nortriptyline elimination. Three depressed hemodialysis patients were treated with nortriptyline (75 mg at night) for 6 wk. The ratios of the steady-state plasma concentrations of unconjugated 10-hydroxynortriptyline to nortriptyline (0.74 to 2.30) were in the same range as those in a control group of depressed patients with adequate renal function (0.53 to 4.08) who were also receiving nortriptyline. Conjugated 10-hydroxynortriptyline in renal failure patients was slow to reach steady-state concentrations and these were 10 to 20 times as high as those of the control depressed patients. Conjugated 10-hydroxynortriptyline in dialysis fluid during treatment showed that a mean 43 +/- 7% (SD) of the dose was removed by a 10-hr dialysis. Dialysis clearance of conjugated 10-hydroxynortriptyline was 58 +/- 8 (SD) ml min-1, but nortriptyline and unconjugated 10-hydroxynortriptyline were not appreciably removed by dialysis. Hemodialysis is not likely to be of value in the management of acute nortriptyline poisoning.

Adolescent↗

PubMed2002

Effect of nortriptyline and paroxetine on CYP2D6 activity in depressed elderly patients.

This study was performed in elderly patients (1) to assess the degree to which CYP2D6 mediated metabolism of debrisoquine at baseline determines plasma concentration to dose quotients for nortriptyline or paroxetine after 4 weeks of treatment, and (2) to compare the effects of nortriptyline and paroxetine on debrisoquine metabolism after 6 weeks of treatment. CYP2D6 activity was estimated in 66 subjects (71.4 +/- 7.2 years) before initiating treatment and again after 6 weeks of treatment with either nortriptyline or paroxetine under randomized, double-blind conditions according to a standard protocol. CYP2D6 activity was estimated by the debrisoquine recovery ratio in a 6- to 8-hour urine sample collected after oral administration of 10 mg debrisoquine sulfate. Nortriptyline and paroxetine plasma concentrations were obtained weekly. Baseline debrisoquine recovery ratio values were significantly correlated with the plasma concentration to dose quotient at 4 weeks for both nortriptyline ( = -0.75, = 0.0001, N = 29) and paroxetine ( = -0.50, = 0.003, N = 33). Treatment with either nortriptyline or paroxetine was associated with a significant decrease in the median debrisoquine recovery ratio, reflecting inhibition of CYP2D6 metabolism. The percent decrease associated with nortriptyline was significantly smaller than that with paroxetine ( < 0.0001). None of the patients treated with nortriptyline but 19 of the 32 extensive metabolizers treated with paroxetine were converted to phenotypic poor metabolic status. Our observations of CYP2D6 inhibition are consistent with data and results obtained in younger healthy volunteers. The significant correlations between baseline debrisoquine recovery ratio and the plasma concentrations to dose quotients at 4 weeks for both nortriptyline and paroxetine are consistent with CYP2D6 playing a major role in the metabolism of both drugs. CYP2D6 inhibition by paroxetine, which effectively converted 59% of patients to phenotypic PMs, may be especially relevant for elderly patients given their generally higher concentration of paroxetine.

Adrenergic Agents↗

PubMed1986

Effects of smoking on nortriptyline plasma concentrations in depressed patients.

The pharmacokinetic parameters of half-life, volume of distribution, and steady-state nortriptyline plasma concentration normalized to a 100-mg/day maintenance dose were calculated in nine smokers and 15 nonsmokers. The mean normalized total nortriptyline concentration for the smokers of 118 +/- 33 ng/ml was significantly lower than the nonsmokers' mean value of 158 +/- 35 ng/ml. The mean normalized free plasma concentrations for the smokers of 11.4 +/- 3.5 ng/ml was not different from the nonsmokers' mean concentrations of 11.5 +/- 2.6 ng/ml. The smokers had a slightly higher percentage free drug values of 10.2 +/- 4.0% (p = 0.08) as contrasted to 7.4 +/- 1.5% free nortriptyline for the nonsmokers. The nortriptyline half-life figures for both the free and total drug concentrations did not differ. Multiple linear regression analysis utilizing age, smoking status, sex, liver function, and the presence or absence of enzyme-inducing or -inhibiting drugs as the potential independent variables and percentage free nortriptyline or total nortriptyline concentration as the dependent variable, found that smoking status explained 21% of the variation in the percentage free nortriptyline in the patients and 26% of the variation in the total nortriptyline concentrations. These preliminary data suggest that smokers ideally should be dosed at the lower end of the nortriptyline therapeutic range, whereas nonsmokers should be dosed at the upper end to maximize the antidepressant effect and minimize adverse effects.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1999

Treatment of bereavement-related major depressive episodes in later life: a controlled study of acute and continuation treatment with nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy.

OBJECTIVE: The authors tested the hypothesis that nortriptyline and interpersonal psychotherapy, alone and in combination, are superior to placebo in achieving remission of bereavement-related major depressive episodes. METHOD: Eighty subjects, aged 50 years and older, with major depressive episodes that began within 6 months before or 12 months after the loss of a spouse or significant other were randomly assigned to a 16-week doubleblind trial of one of four treatment conditions: nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy (N = 16), nortriptyline alone in a medication clinic (N = 25), placebo plus interpersonal psychotherapy (N = 17), or placebo alone in a medication clinic (N = 22). The protocol required that the acute-phase double-blind treatment be ended after 8 weeks if Hamilton depression scale ratings had not improved by 50%. Remission was defined as a 17-item Hamilton scale score of 7 or lower for 3 consecutive weeks. RESULTS: The rate of remission for nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy was 69% (N = 11); for medication clinic, nortriptyline, 56% (N = 14); for placebo plus interpersonal psychotherapy, 29% (N = 5); and for medication clinic, placebo, 45% (N = 10). In a generalized logit model, there was a significant effect of nortriptyline over placebo but no interpersonal psychotherapy effect and no nortriptyline-by-interpersonal psychotherapy interaction. Rates of all-cause attrition were lowest in the nortriptyline plus interpersonal psychotherapy group. CONCLUSIONS: Nortriptyline was superior to placebo in achieving remission of bereavement-related major depressive episodes. The combination of medication and psychotherapy was associated with the highest rate of treatment completion. These results support the use of pharmacologic treatment of major depressive episodes in the wake of a serious life stressor such as bereavement.

Aged↗

PubMed1996

Pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and nortriptyline.

OBJECTIVE: Case report of a pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and nortriptyline. METHODS: Determination of plasma nortriptyline concentrations by HPLC. Calculation of nortriptyline clearances and half-life by formulae used routinely in therapeutic drug monitoring. RESULTS: The average plasma concentration of nortriptyline at steady state (Css) divided by the amount of nortriptyline administered per time rose significantly in a patient with concomitant administration of diltiazem, suggesting increased bioavailability and/or decreased clearance of nortriptyline. CONCLUSIONS: There is a significant pharmacokinetic interaction between diltiazem and nortriptyline, which is probably due to a reduction in the first pass clearance of nortriptyline, leading to an increase in its bioavailability.

Antidepressive Agents, Tricyclic↗

PubMed2006

A controlled trial of nortriptyline, sustained-release bupropion and placebo for smoking cessation: preliminary results.

PURPOSE AND METHODS: Cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) constitutes the basis of smoking cessation programs. Quitting rates are usually increased by the concomitant use of CBT and pharmacotherapy. There are studies showing the efficacy of bupropion and nortriptyline compared to placebo, but there is just one published comparison between these drugs, unfortunately with low power to detect significant differences. This study was designed to compare the efficacy of bupropion, nortriptyline and placebo in a group of smokers who also received intensive counseling therapy. We conducted a double blind, double-dummy, placebo-controlled trial for smoking cessation that lasted 9 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive nortriptyline 75 mg/day (52 subjects), bupropion 300 mg/day (53 subjects) or placebo (51 subjects). All smokers also received the same intensive cognitive behavior therapy. The target day for quitting smoking was usually day 10. Intensive counseling was provided at baseline, weekly during treatment, and at 10, 13, 16, 20 and 26 weeks. Abstinence was defined as continuous when the subject was not smoking since the target-quitting day (self-report) and had an expired carbon monoxide concentration of 10 ppm or less. RESULTS: The sustained abstinence rates at 6 months were 21.6% in the placebo group, 30.8% in the nortriptyline group (p = 0.40), and 41.5% in the bupropion group (p = 0.05). The odds ratio was not statistically different for smokers using nortriptyline or bupropion (OR 1.60; 95% CI 0.66-3.86; p = 0.35). The most common adverse events were dry mouth and drowsiness in the nortriptyline group and dry mouth and insomnia in the bupropion group. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with CBT + bupropion resulted in a better 6-month rate of smoking cessation compared to CBT+nortriptyline or CBT + placebo. Abstinence rate in the nortriptyline group was not statistically different from patients in the bupropion or placebo group.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

PubMed2001

CYP2D6 genotyping with oligonucleotide microarrays and nortriptyline concentrations in geriatric depression.

Recent advances in oligonucleotide microarray technology ("gene chips") permit rapid screening for DNA sequence variation. The CYP2D6 gene encodes debrisoquine hydroxylase, which metabolizes the antidepressant nortriptyline and other psychotropic medications. Nortriptyline plasma concentrations were obtained after at least three weeks of treatment in 36 geriatric patients with major depression who were taking a mean of 8.6 other medications besides nortriptyline. Oligonucleotide microarrays were used to detect 16 CYP2D6 alleles that affect debrisoquine hydroxylase activity. Subjects carrying alleles encoding impaired debrisoquine hydroxylase activity had significantly greater nortriptyline concentrations and lower nortriptyline doses than did other subjects. Significant correlations were found between the numbers of alleles encoding decreased metabolism and nortriptyline plasma concentration, nortriptyline dose, and nortriptyline plasma concentration standardized for dose, indicating a gene dosage effect. These results demonstrate that CYP2D6 genotyping on a microarray platform can be used to predict plasma antidepressant concentrations despite advanced patient age and numerous concurrent medications.

Aged↗

PubMed2002

Major depression with ischemic heart disease: effects of paroxetine and nortriptyline on measures of nonlinearity and chaos of heart rate.

Depression is associated with increased cardiovascular mortality in patients with preexisting cardiac illness. A decrease in cardiac vagal function as suggested by a decrease in heart rate variability (HRV) or heart period variability has been linked to sudden death in patients with cardiac disease as well as in normal controls. Recent studies have shown decreased vagal function in cardiac patients with depression as well as in depressed patients without cardiac illness. In this study, we compared 20 h awake and sleep heart period nonlinear measures using quantification of nonlinearity and chaos in two groups of patients with major depression and ischemic heart disease (mean age 59-60 years) before and after 6 weeks of treatment with paroxetine or nortriptyline. Patients received paroxetine, 20-30 mg/day or nortriptyline targeted to 190-570 nmol/l for 6 weeks. For HRV analysis, 24 patients were included in the paroxetine treatment study and 20 patients in the nortriptyline study who had at least 20000 s of awake data. The ages of these groups were 60.4 +/- 10.5 years for paroxetine and 60.8 +/- 13.4 years for nortriptyline. There was a significant decrease in the largest Lyapunov exponent (LLE) after treatment with nortriptyline but not paroxetine. There were also significant decreases in nonlinearity scores on S(netPR) and S(netGS) after nortriptyline, which may be due to a decrease in cardiac vagal modulation of HRV. S(netGS) and awake LLE were the most significant variables that contributed to the discrimination of postparoxetine and postnortriptyline groups even with the inclusion of time and frequency domain measures. These findings suggest that nortriptyline decreases the measures of chaos probably through its stronger vagolytic effects on cardiac autonomic function compared with paroxetine, which is in agreement with previous clinical and preclinical reports. Nortriptyline was also associated with a significant decrease in nonlinearity scores, which may be due to anticholinergic and/or sympatholytic effects. As depression is associated with a strong risk factor for cardiovascular mortality, one should be careful about using any drug that adversely affects cardiac vagal function.

Aged↗

PubMed1997

Effect of sertraline on plasma nortriptyline levels in depressed elderly.

BACKGROUND: Several serotonin selective reuptake inhibitors have been reported to be inhibitors of the cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6). Thus, they may increase the plasma level of secondary amine tricyclic antidepressants, which are predominantly metabolized through this enzyme. Except for a few case reports, no clinical data document the degree of this drug-drug interaction in elderly depressed patients. METHOD: We systematically examined this interaction by determining the change in plasma nortriptyline levels in 14 elderly depressed patients in whom sertraline was added to nortriptyline. RESULTS: After addition of 50 mg/day of sertraline, the median increase in plasma nortriptyline level over baseline was 2% (range, -26% to 117%; p = .30). In 2 patients (14%), there was an increase of 50% or more. For patients taking higher sertraline doses (N = 7; 100 or 150 mg/day), the median increase in plasma nortriptyline level over baseline was 40% (range, -12% to 239%; p = .08). CONCLUSION: Overall, a modest effect of sertraline was observed on nortriptyline metabolism in these elderly depressed patients. This is consistent with prior reports of a weak inhibition of CYP2D6 by sertraline in vitro and in young healthy volunteers. However, some patients showed a change in plasma nortriptyline level that would be considered clinically significant. Thus, careful monitoring of plasma nortriptyline levels is recommended in all patients treated with a combination of nortriptyline and sertraline.

1-Naphthylamine↗

PubMed1998

A randomized trial of nortriptyline for smoking cessation.

BACKGROUND: Smoking cessation rates with current therapy are suboptimal. One class of drugs that may improve cessation is the tricyclics. OBJECTIVE: To add nortriptyline hydrochloride to a behavioral smoking cessation program to enhance cessation rates and reduce withdrawal symptoms. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We conducted a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial at an affiliated Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center and an Army Medical Center. Subjects were aged 18 through 70 years, smoked 10 or more cigarettes per day, and were without current major depression. Nortriptyline hydrochloride or matched placebo was started at 25 mg before bed 10 days prior to quit day and titrated to 75 mg/d or to the maximal tolerated dose. The behavioral intervention consisted of 2 group sessions and 12 individual follow-up visits. Withdrawal symptoms were measured using a daily diary, and smoking cessation was defined as self-reported abstinence, expired carbon monoxide of 9 ppm or less, and a 6-month urine cotinine level of less than 50 ng/mL. RESULTS: A total of 214 patients were randomized (108 to nortriptyline and 106 to placebo). There was a significant reduction in several withdrawal symptoms including anxious/tense, anger/irritability, difficulty concentrating, restlessness, and impatience by day 8 after quit day in the nortriptyline group. The cessation rate at 6 months was 15 (14%) of 108 and 3 (3%) of 106, respectively (P = .003; absolute difference, 11%; 95% confidence interval, -18% to -4%). Nortriptyline caused frequent adverse effects, including dry mouth (64%) and dysgeusia (20%). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that nortriptyline led to an increased short-term cessation rate compared with placebo. In addition, there were significant, but relatively small, reductions in withdrawal symptoms. Nortriptyline may represent a new therapeutic approach to smoking cessation.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

PubMed2005

Efficacy of bupropion and nortriptyline for smoking cessation among people at risk for or with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: The observations that smokers with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of depression and that nicotine may have antidepressant effects and regulate mood provide a rationale for the use of antidepressant drugs for smoking cessation in patients with COPD. No clinical trial has studied the efficacy of bupropion hydrochloride and nortriptyline hydrochloride for smoking cessation in this patient population, to our knowledge. METHODS: In a placebo-controlled double-dummy randomized trial, 255 adults at risk for COPD or with COPD were prescribed sustained-release bupropion (bupropion SR) (150 mg twice daily) or nortriptyline (75 mg once daily) for 12 weeks. All patients received smoking cessation counseling. The main outcome measure was prolonged abstinence from smoking from week 4 to week 26 after the target quit date. RESULTS: The use of bupropion SR and nortriptyline resulted in higher prolonged abstinence rates compared with placebo, although only the difference between bupropion SR and placebo was statistically significant (differences with placebo, 13.1% [95% confidence interval, 1.2%-25.1%] for bupropion SR and 10.2% [95% confidence interval, -1.7% to 22.2%] for nortriptyline). In patients with COPD, bupropion SR and nortriptyline seem efficacious in achieving prolonged abstinence (differences with placebo, 18.9% [95% confidence interval, 3.6%-34.2%] for bupropion SR and 12.9% [95% confidence interval, -0.8% to 26.4%] for nortriptyline). In participants at risk for COPD, no statistically significant differences with placebo in prolonged abstinence rates were found. CONCLUSIONS: Bupropion SR treatment is an efficacious aid to smoking cessation in patients with COPD. Nortriptyline treatment seems to be a useful alternative.

Antidepressive Agents, Second-Generation↗

PubMed1998

Comparison of paroxetine and nortriptyline in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease.

CONTEXT: Depression and ischemic heart disease often are comorbid conditions and, in patients who have had a myocardial infarction, the presence of depression is associated with increased mortality. Patients with heart disease need a safe and effective treatment for depression. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, cardiovascular effects, and safety of a specific serotonin reuptake inhibitor, paroxetine, with a tricyclic antidepressant, nortriptyline hydrochloride, in depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. DESIGN: Two-week placebo lead-in followed by a double-blind randomized 6-week medication trial. SETTING: Research clinics in 4 university centers. PATIENTS: Eighty-one outpatients meeting Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder and with documented ischemic heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with either paroxetine, 20 to 30 mg/d, or nortriptyline targeted to a therapeutic plasma level, 190 to 570 nmol/L (50-150 ng/mL), for 6 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: For effectiveness of treatment, a decline in the score of the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression by 50% and final score of 8 or less; for cardiovascular safety, heart rate and rhythm, supine and standing systolic and diastolic blood pressures, electrocardiogram conduction intervals, indexes of heart rate variability, and rate of adverse events. RESULTS: By intent-to-treat analysis, 25 (61%) of 41 patients improved during treatment with paroxetine and 22 (55%) of 40 improved with nortriptyline. Neither drug significantly affected blood pressure or conduction intervals. Paroxetine had no sustained effects on heart rate or rhythm or indexes of heart rate variability, whereas patients treated with nortriptyline had a sustained 11% increase in heart rate from a mean of 75 to 83 beats per minute (P<.001) and a reduction in heart rate variability, as measured by the SD of all normal R-R intervals over a 24-hour period, from 112 to 96 (P<.01). Adverse cardiac events occurred in 1 (2%) of 41 patients treated with paroxetine and 7 (18%) of 40 patients treated with nortriptyline (P<.03). CONCLUSIONS: Paroxetine and nortriptyline are effective treatments for depressed patients with ischemic heart disease. Nortriptyline treatment was associated with a significantly higher rate of serious adverse cardiac events compared with paroxetine.

Adrenergic Uptake Inhibitors↗

PubMed1985

Effect of imipramine and nortriptyline on left ventricular function and blood pressure in patients treated for arrhythmias.

The effect of imipramine or nortriptyline on left ventricular function and orthostatic blood pressure was evaluated in 20 nondepressed cardiac patients treated for ventricular premature depolarizations (VPDs). Drug was administered by mouth and dose ranging used, 1 mg/kg/day (imipramine) or 0.5 mg/kg/day (nortriptyline), was increased after four doses (imipramine) or six doses (nortriptyline) until greater than 80% suppression of VPDs or adverse effects occurred or until a maximum dose of 5 mg/kg/day (imipramine) or 3.5 mg/kg/day (nortriptyline) was given. Fourteen (70%) had greater than 80% VPD suppression, five had less than 80% improvement (range 25% to 77%), and one had a VPD frequency increase of 6%. Mean daily imipramine dose was 210 +/- 103 mg and mean nortriptyline dose was 100 +/- 29 mg. Neither drug significantly changed mean ejection fraction or peak systolic pressure end-systolic volume ratio by radionuclide angiogram. Both reduced standing systolic blood pressure: mean change after imipramine was 26 mm Hg (NS), and after nortriptyline, 14 mm Hg (p less than 0.05). Drug was discontinued in two patients because of symptomatic orthostatic blood pressure change greater than 30 mm Hg. There was not a significant relationship between dose, drug concentration, or functional class and orthostatic change in systolic blood pressure but there was for age (p less than 0.05). These observations suggest that even cardiac patients with impaired systolic function may take imipramine or nortriptyline for VPDs; however, frequent blood pressure measurement is advised, particularly in older patients.

Adult↗