PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Nerve Block”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMedDate not supplied

C2/C3 nerve blocks and greater occipital nerve block in cervicogenic headache treatment.

In the diagnosis of cervicogenic headache, greater occipital nerve (GON), cervical nerve, minor occipital nerve, and cervical facet joint blocks are used. In our study we compared the GON and C2/C3 nerve blocks in the diagnosis and treatment of cervicogenic headache. In both cases, repeated blocks proved to have a long-lasting effect in the treatment of this disorder, with both GON and C2/C3 blocks being found to be equally effective.

Anesthetics, Local↗
PubMed2004

Levobupivacaine versus ropivacaine in psoas compartment block and sciatic nerve block in orthopedic surgery of the lower extremity.

AIM: The aim of this study was to compare the clinical profiles of psoas block and sciatic nerve block performed with either 0.5% levobupivacaine or 0.75% ropivacaine. METHODS: With ethical committee approval and written informed consent 80 ASA physical status I-II patients, undergoing lower extremity surgery received intravenous premedication with midazolam (0.05 mg/kg) and atropine (0.01 mg/kg). Patients were randomly allocated to receive a lumbar plexus block with: Levobupivacaine Group (L) 30 ml of 0.5% levobupivacaine or Ropivacaine Group (R) 0.75% ropivacaine, and sciatic nerve block with: Group R 10 ml 0.75 ropivacaine or Group L 0.5% levobupivacaine. The onset time and duration of nerve block were evaluated. RESULTS: The motor onset time was shorter in Group L than in Group R. The motor offset time was similar in the 2 groups, the time being slightly greater for Group R. Group L presented a higher difference of resolution to motor-sensitive block compared to Group R. CONCLUSIONS: The differences between Groups L and R were characterised by: a faster motor onset time in Group L with a longer time between motor and sensitive resolution determining a lower demand for analgesic drugs postoperatively and greater support for motor control recovery.

Amides↗
PubMed1992

An evaluation of the incisive nerve block and combination inferior alveolar and incisive nerve blocks in mandibular anesthesia.

The purpose of this study was to measure the degree of anesthesia obtained with the incisive nerve block, the inferior alveolar nerve block and a combination of both injections in mandibular teeth. Using a repeated measures design, 40 subjects randomly received an incisive nerve block, a conventional inferior alveolar nerve block, or a combination inferior alveolar nerve block plus an incisive nerve block using either lidocaine or saline (control), at four successive appointments. The mandibular teeth and contralateral canine (+/- controls) were blindly tested with an Analytic Technology pulp tester at 4-min cycles for 60 min. An 80 reading indicated complete pulpal anesthesia. The incisive nerve block alone did not result in successful pulpal anesthesia in the central, lateral, first, and second molars. It was successful in the first and second premolars but the duration was approximately 30 min. The combination inferior alveolar nerve block plus incisive nerve block was successful in the first and second premolars, and enhanced anesthesia for the laterals and first molars.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

[Three-in-one block or femoral nerve block. What should be done and how?].

The "3 in 1" block and the femoral nerve block are widely used for lower limb surgery and postoperative analgesia. Whether these blocks are in fact a same regional block with two different names or represent definitively two different blocks remains controversial. A large number of anatomical as well as functional variations of the lumbar plexus have been described and complicate a rational analysis of the spread of local anaesthetics following these blocks. Anatomical, radiological and especially clinical data seem to confirm that these blocks are to be distinguished from one another. Femoral nerve block requires the use of a nerve stimulator and has a high success rate in the territory of the femoral nerve; a spread towards other lumbar nerves, especially the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, is sometimes observed. The "3 in 1" block is supported by the idea of diffusion within a space that is located after going through two fascial layers. Even in experienced hands, the success predictive value is not high. However, once the "3 in 1" block is well performed, a complete anaesthesia covering the territories of the femoral nerve, the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve, and the obturator nerve occurs. Specific indications of each technique are different: major knee surgery and postoperative analgesia for the "3-in-1" block and leg surgery for femoral nerve block. The best approach for knee arthroscopy remains open for discussion.

Arthroscopy↗
PubMed2004

Postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement: the effect of an obturator nerve block added to the femoral 3-in-1 nerve block.

Femoral nerve block (FNB) does not consistently produce anesthesia of the obturator nerve. In this single-blind, randomized, controlled study we added a selective obturator nerve block (ONB) to FNB to analyze its influence on postoperative analgesia after total knee replacement (TKR). Before general anesthesia, 90 patients undergoing TKR received FNB (Group 1), FNB and selective ONB (Group 2), or placebo FNB (Group 3). Postoperative analgesia was further provided by morphine IV via patient-controlled analgesia. Analgesic efficacy and side effects were recorded in the first 6 h after surgery. Adductor strength decreased by 18% +/- 9% in Group 1 and by 78% +/- 22% in Group 2 (P < 0.0001). Total morphine consumption was reduced in Group 2 compared with Groups 1 and 3 (P < or = 0.0001). Patients in Group 2 reported lower pain scores than those in Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.0003). The incidence of nausea was more frequent in Groups 1 and 3 (P = 0.01). We conclude that FNB does not produce complete anesthesia of the obturator nerve. Single-shot FNB does not provide additional benefits on pain at rest over opioids alone in the early postoperative period. The addition of an ONB to FNB improves postoperative analgesia after TKR.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

Evaluation of genitofemoral nerve block, in addition to ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric nerve block, during inguinal hernia repair in children.

BACKGROUND: Ilioinguinal and iliohypogastric (IG-IH) nerve block has been widely used in children undergoing inguinal hernia repair. This technique may provide insufficient analgesia for intraoperative management as the inguinal region may receive sensory innervation from genitofemoral nerve. We proposed that addition of a genitofemoral nerve block might improve the quality of analgesia. METHODS: Ninety-eight children undergoing inguinal hernia repair were assigned randomly to receive either IG-IH nerve block (Group I) or IG-IH and genitofemoral nerve blocks (Group II). Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded before surgery (control), after skin incision, at sac traction and at the end of surgery. Postoperative analgesic requirements and incidence of complications were recorded until discharge. RESULTS: At sac traction, SAP and HR were significantly higher in Group I (P<0.05), and the incidence of episodes of increased HR was also significantly higher in Group II (29 vs 12%, respectively, P<0.05). There were no significant differences in SAP and HR at other time points, postoperative analgesic requirements or incidence of complications between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: The benefit of the additional genitofemoral nerve block to IG-IH nerve block was limited only to the time of sac traction without any postoperative effect. This suggests there is little clinical benefit in the addition of a genitofemoral nerve block.

Analgesics↗
PubMedDate not supplied

Comparison of ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, and topical anesthesia for neonatal circumcision: a randomized controlled trial.

CONTEXT: Beliefs about the safety and effectiveness of current anesthetics have resulted in many newborns being circumcised without the benefit of anesthesia. OBJECTIVE: To compare ring block, dorsal penile nerve block, a topical eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA), and topical placebo when used for neonatal circumcision. The placebo represented current practice, with no anesthetic for neonatal circumcision. DESIGN: A randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Antenatal units in 2 tertiary care hospitals in Edmonton, Alberta. PARTICIPANTS: A consecutive sample of 52 healthy, full-term, male newborns, aged 1 to 3 days. INTERVENTIONS: Physiological and behavioral monitoring occurred in a series of trials: baseline, drug application, preparation, circumcision, and postcircumcision. Surgical procedures defined the following 4 stages of the circumcision: cleansing, separation, clamp on, and clamp off. Methemoglobin level was assessed 6 hours after surgery. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Heart rate, cry, and methemoglobin level. RESULTS: Newborns in the untreated placebo group exhibited homogeneous responses that consisted of sustained elevation of heart rate and high-pitched cry throughout the circumcision and following. Two newborns in the placebo group became ill following circumcision (choking and apnea). The 3 treatment groups all had significantly less crying and lower heart rates during and following circumcision compared with the untreated group. The ring block was equally effective through all stages of the circumcision, whereas the dorsal penile nerve block and EMLA were not effective during foreskin separation and incision. Methemoglobin levels were highest in the EMLA group, although no newborn required treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The most effective anesthetic is the ring block; EMLA is the least effective. It is our recommendation that an anesthetic should be administered to newborns prior to undergoing circumcision.

Administration, Topical↗
PubMed1984

Neuropathy after bupivacaine (Marcaine) wrist and metacarpal nerve blocks.

A series of 49 wrist and metacarpal blocks were done with the use of 0.25% or 0.5% bupivacaine in 44 patients for surgical and therapeutic purposes. Seven patients developed hypesthesia in the blocked nerve distribution lasting from 1 week to 4 months. One patient had pain and a positive Tinel sign in a dorsal branch of a digital nerve lasting 2 1/2 months. Since no neuropathies were reported in large series of nerve blocks with bupivacaine in other anatomic areas, it is postulated that bupivacaine in anatomically confined areas can cause a transient neuropathy possibly caused by a large local dose of the drug.

Adult↗
PubMed1996

The effect of the high palmar nerve block and the ulnar nerve block on lameness provoked by a collagenase-induced tendonitis of the lateral branch of the suspensory ligament.

Controversy exists with respect to the innervation of the suspensory ligament (SL) in the fore limb of the horse. It is uncertain whether this structure is exclusively innervated by branches of the ulnar nerve or also to some extent by median nerve branches. Ground Reaction Forces (GRF) were determined in horses before and after the induction of a tendonitis in the lateral branch of the SL by the injection of collagenase, and before and after a high palmar and an ulnar block respectively. The high palmar block succeeded in bringing all GRF variables back to their original values which the ulnar block did not. It is concluded that the SL is innervated by branches of both the ulnar and the median nerves, with the median nerve being relatively more important for the distal part of the SL.

Animals↗
PubMed2004

Adding a selective obturator nerve block to the parasacral sciatic nerve block: an evaluation.

Our aim was to objectively evaluate the efficacy of obturator nerve anesthesia after a parasacral block. Patients scheduled for knee surgery had a baseline adductor strength evaluation. After a parasacral block with 30 mL 0.75% ropivacaine, sensory deficit in the sciatic distribution (temperature discrimination) and adductor strength were assessed at 5-min intervals. Patients with an incomplete sensory block (defined as a temperature discrimination score of less than 2 in the 3 cutaneous distributions of the sciatic nerve tested) 30 min after the parasacral block were excluded from the study. Subsequently, a selective obturator block was performed with 7 mL 0.75% ropivacaine and adductor strength was reassessed at 5 min intervals for 15 min. Finally, a femoral block was performed using 10 mL 0.75% ropivacaine. Patient discomfort level during each block was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Thirty-one patients completed the study. Five patients were excluded as a result of inadequate sensory block in the sciatic distribution 30 min after the parasacral block (success rate of 89%). Thirty min after the parasacral block, adductor strength decreased by 11.3% +/- 7% compared with baseline (85 +/- 24 versus 97 +/- 28 mm Hg, P = 0.002). Fifteen min after the obturator nerve block, adductor muscle strength decreased by an additional 69% +/- 7% (16.6 +/- 15 versus 85 +/- 24 mm Hg, P < 0.0001). VAS scores were similar for all blocks (26 +/- 19, 28 +/- 24, and 27 +/- 19 mm for parasacral, obturator, and femoral respectively). Four parasacral blocks were simulated in 2 fresh cadavers using 30 mL of colored latex solution. The spread of the die in relation to the obturator nerve was assessed. Injection of 30 mL colored latex into cadavers resulted in spread of the injectate restricted to the sacral plexus. These findings demonstrate the unreliability of parasacral block to achieve anesthesia of the obturator nerve. A selective obturator block should be considered in the clinical setting when this is desirable.

Aged↗
PubMed2004

A novel technique for pudendal nerve block.

Pudendal nerve block is performed to confirm the diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia. Many physicians and patients are hesitant to pursue diagnostic nerve blocks to confirm the diagnosis of pudendal neuralgia secondary to significant patient discomfort, the need for special equipment, and the risk in the traditionally described approach. OBJECTIVE: To describe a novel technique for pudendal nerve block with minimal risk and decreased patient discomfort. DESCRIPTION OF THE TECHNIQUE: With the patient in the prone position, the C-arm is projected in the anteroposterior position until the pelvic inlet is visualized. Subsequently, the ischial spine is highlighted by 5 to 15 degree ipsilateral oblique angulation of the fluoroscope. A 25-gauge 3.5 cm needle is advanced to the tip of the ischial spine where the pudendal nerve transiently leaves the pelvis. The pudendal nerve block is performed at this level. CONCLUSION: We described a new and novel technique to block pudendal nerve under fluoroscopic visualization safely with increased patient comfort.

Journal Article↗
PubMed1995

Comparison of an extraconal block with a retrobulbar-facial block combination for ocular surgery. A safe alternative technique to the combination of retrobulbar block and facial nerve block.

Four hundred and eight consecutive patients scheduled for cataract surgery under local anaesthesia were randomly allocated to one of two types of regional anaesthesia. One group was given the standard retrobulbar block combined with a facial nerve block of the O'Brien type, and the second group was given a modified peribulbar block. Results indicate that it is possible to achieve a high degree of reliability, within a relatively short time, from the modified peribulbar block without the major complications associated with retrobulbar block.

Anesthesia, Local↗
PubMed1995

Electromyographic comparison of obturator nerve block to three-in-one block.

Obturator nerve block during spinal, epidural, or general anesthesia without muscle relaxants has been recommended for transurethral surgery to prevent thigh adductor muscle contractions during operative electrocautery. We investigated the effectiveness of direct obturator and 3-in-1 nerve motor blocks in 44 patients undergoing transurethral surgery during spinal anesthesia with isobaric bupivacaine. Patients were randomly assigned to receive 3-in-1 block with 40 mL (n = 13) or 50 mL (n = 11) of 1.5% lidocaine plus epinephrine, or direct obturator nerve block with 10 mL of 2% lidocaine plus epinephrine (n = 20). After both direct obturator and 3-in-1 blocks, compound muscle action potential (CMAP) testing of the obturator nerve was performed at 1-10-s intervals for 10 min. In patients given direct obturator nerve block (n = 20), CMAP amplitude decreased by 88.8 +/- 21% (mean +/- SD) from baseline. In contrast, 3-in-1 block reduced the evoked CMAP amplitude by 7.4 +/- 19% (P < 0.05). Peak lidocaine plasma levels of 1.6 +/- 0.2 micrograms/mL (range 1.0-2.8 micrograms/mL) were reached 60-90 min after the block in those patients receiving 50 mL of local anesthetic. The 3-in-1 technique fails to predictably result in effective motor block of the obturator nerve and thus may not prevent inadvertent thigh adductor muscle contractions during transurethral surgery. A direct approach to the obturator nerve is significantly more effective in producing motor block, and even when given in larger than recommended dosages it results in subtoxic peak plasma lidocaine concentrations.

Action Potentials↗