SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Proctocolectomy, Restorative”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed1991

Comparison of restorative proctocolectomy with and without covering ileostomy in ulcerative colitis.

The experience of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is reported in 16 consecutive patients with no covering ileostomy (group 2) in comparison with 15 patients with a covering stoma (group 1); in each group a J pouch was constructed. All patients had pre- and postoperative clinical and manometric evaluations of the functional result up to 12 months. There were no deaths or permanent failures. The number of early complications was four in each group. Re-ileostomy was needed in one patient of group 1, and an ileostomy was constructed in three patients of group 2. At 1 year after operation the functional results did not differ between groups 1 and 2 in terms of daily frequency of defaecation (mean 5.6 and 5.4 in 24 h respectively), or in terms of anal basal or maximal squeeze pressures. There was a significant (P less than 0.01) saving in total hospital stay (median 11 days) and in operating theatre time (mean 41 min) in patients with no covering ileostomy. It is concluded that a covering ileostomy may be unnecessary in restorative proctocolectomy, at least in suitable cases with no technical difficulty at the time of operation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1988

Anal sensation after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

The hypothesis that anal sensation might be better after restorative proctocolectomy with end-to-end ileoanal anastomosis than after mucosal proctectomy with endo-anal anastomosis was tested in this study. Anal sensation was measured in 14 patients before operation, 16 patients after restorative proctocolectomy with end-to-end anastomosis (RP + EEA) and 13 patients after mucosal proctectomy with endo-anal anastomosis 1 cm above the dentate line (MP + EAA). Threshold electrosensitivity was measured in the upper, mid and lower anal canal by means of a bipolar constant current stimulator probe. The 'recto'-anal inhibitory reflex was tested, and the patients' ability to discriminate between flatus and faeces and to release flatus 'safely' was assessed by interview. In the upper anal canal, threshold sensitivity was significantly greater in patients who had undergone MP + EAA than in patients who had undergone RP + EEA (P less than 0.05). In the mid and lower anal canal, electrosensitivity in the three groups of patients did not differ significantly. Twelve patients (75 per cent) regained the 'recto'-anal reflex after RP + EEA, but after MP + EAA only three patients (23 per cent) did so (P less than 0.02). Thirteen patients after RP + EEA could release flatus safely without fear of faecal leakage, compared with only four after MP + EAA (P less than 0.02). The proportions of patients in these two groups who said they were able to discriminate flatus from faeces did not differ significantly. Anal sensation and discriminatory function are significantly better after end-to-end ileoanal anastomosis than after mucosal proctectomy with endo-anal anastomosis.

Adult↗

PubMed1992

Transitory elevation of serum amylase levels after restorative proctocolectomy.

The incidence of postoperative hyperamylasaemia was evaluated in 70 patients who underwent staged restorative proctocolectomy. On the 14th postoperative day, 27 of 70 patients after total colectomy showed hyperamylasaemia, and the serum amylase returned to normal on the 30th postoperative day. Three out of 37 after ileoanal anastomosis and 8 out of 70 after stoma closure showed elevation of serum amylase postoperatively. Total colectomy might have a possible role in the postoperative increase of serum amylase. None of these patients had any obvious clinical evidence of postoperative pancreatitis. In 7 patients showing significant elevation of serum amylase levels (over 1000 IU), this was due predominantly to the pancreatic isoenzyme. This transitory elevation of serum amylase did not seem to be altered by the administration of therapeutic agents for pancreatitis. These observations suggest that postoperative hyperamylasaemia without clinical evidence of pancreatitis is very common after total colectomy, and that postoperative hyperamylasaemia itself does not necessarily require treatment.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed1992

Carcinoma of the rectal pouch following restorative proctocolectomy. Report of a case.

A case of adenocarcinoma developing in the pouch following restorative proctocolectomy is presented. This seems to be the third reported in the literature. The carcinoma developed from the remnants of precancerous rectal mucosa left in the muscular rectal cuff. The patient had been suffering from ulcerative colitis for 17 years prior to the development of the malignancy. He presented with features of subacute intestinal obstruction. Diagnosis was by sigmoidoscopic examination of the pouch and biopsy. He was treated with abdominoperineal resection of the pouch and rectum, followed by chemotherapy.

Adenocarcinoma↗

PubMed1988

Prospective randomized trial to compare the stapled double lumen pouch and the sutured quadruple pouch for restorative proctocolectomy.

Thirty-three consecutive patients having restorative proctocolectomy since April 1986 were randomly allocated to reconstruction using a stapled J pouch (n = 18) or a sutured W pouch (n = 15). There were no deaths, but one patient required pouch excision for ischaemia (J). One patient developed a leak from the pouch necessitating loop ileostomy (J) and one patient had a low pouch vaginal fistula successfully treated by a seton (W). There were no other major complications. Median (range) operative time was 200 min (165-290) for J pouch and 255 min (220-330) for the W pouch (P less than 0.05). In 24 patients followed up for more than 4 months after restoring intestinal continuity, median frequency of defaecation over 24 h was 4 (3-6) for the J pouch and 4 (3-6) for the W pouch. There was no incontinence, urgency or soiling. These results indicate that the quicker J pouch provides identical functional results to the larger W pouch in this series of patients.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1989

Totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy.

A technique of totally stapled abdominal restorative proctocolectomy is reported in 20 consecutive patients using a 20 x 20 cm J pouch and a stapled ileoanal anastomosis. The stapled ileoanal anastomosis had to be abandoned in three patients because of attempted mucosectomy in one and megarectum in two. One patient receiving steroids had a covering ileostomy. The remaining 16 patients had a totally stapled procedure without a covering ileostomy. Three patients developed serious postoperative morbidity but they were the only patients receiving steroids at the time of the operation. Of the remaining 13 patients none developed serious complications, the median hospital stay was 14 days and the median operating time was 150 min. The operation may be a technical advance particularly in allowing pouch construction without ileostomy in fit patients who are not receiving steroids at the time of operation.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Constipation: another indication for restorative proctocolectomy.

We have extended our experience of restorative proctocolectomy and ileoanal anastomosis to include 13 patients with functional bowel disorders. Eight had recurrent constipation after colectomy for slow transit constipation and five had constipation and overflow incontinence associated with megarectum and megacolon. In all cases the only alternative was a permanent stoma. Despite a high complication rate, 11 patients (85 per cent) felt that the operation had been worthwhile with improvement of their symptoms and quality of life. The operation led to a mean frequency of defaecation of 4.8 times (range 2-8) during the day, and 1.2 times (range 0-4) during the night. There was no frank incontinence and, while only one patient experienced soiling during the day, six patients suffered from night-time soiling. Two patients have had the pouch converted to an ileostomy due to persistent complications and a poor functional result.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Closure of loop ileostomy after restorative proctocolectomy.

The outcome of loop ileostomy closure was evaluated in 40 patients who had previously undergone restorative proctocolectomy. A standard operative technique was used which incorporated a circumstomal incision, non-resectional reconstruction and primary skin closure. Thirty-six patients (90%) enjoyed an uncomplicated recovery. One patient (3%) developed a superficial wound infection. Enterocutaneous fistula was not encountered. Small bowel obstruction occurred in three patients (8%) two of whom required a further laparotomy, but subsequently made an uncomplicated recovery. No incisional hernias were identified at follow-up. We conclude that loop ileostomy closure can be achieved with a low morbidity which should not preclude the use of this stoma in restorative proctocolectomy.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1990

Factors affecting anal continence after restorative proctocolectomy.

The aim of this multicentre study was to define the incidence of disordered continence after restorative proctocolectomy and ileoanal reservoir with respect to some factors which may influence the postoperative soiling rate. Two hundred and seven patients underwent the operation, 156 had their ileostomy closed and were all available for a functional assessment. Minor leakage was observed in 26.9% of cases, whereas 1.9% complained of troublesome faecal soiling. None had gross faecal incontinence. Patients over 45 years had significantly more soiling than those younger (45% vs 24%, p less than 0.05). Soiling was more prevalent in those with ulcerative colitis than with other diseases (35% vs 18% p less than 0.05). The soiling rate decreased after the first postoperative year from 34% to 21% (p less than 0.05). A bowel frequency higher than 5 evacuations/24 hours increased soiling from 20% to 48% (p less than 0.01). Pouchitis doubled the soiling rate from 26% to 50% (p less than 0.05) without there being any difference in sphincter function. Soiling was not significantly related to staged procedure, J-pouch, perineal complications or a long rectal cuff. Careful preoperative evaluation of the anal sphincter should be performed in older patients operated on for colitis as they are likely to leak during the first year following restorative proctocolectomy, especially in cases with diarrhoea or pouchitis.

Adolescent↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Restorative proctocolectomy: the Irish experience. Irish Association of Coloproctology.

Between January 1982 and March 1990, 106 patients underwent restorative proctocolectomy in eight separate surgical departments. The indication for operation was ulcerative colitis in 86%, familial adenomatous polyposis in 12% and megacolon in 2%. The age at operation was 33 +/- 2 years (mean +/- sem) (range 15-55 years). There were no perioperative deaths. The principal causes of post-operative morbidity were intra-abdominal sepsis (15%), anastomotic stricture (10%) and intestinal obstruction (8%). Intestinal continuity has been restored in 99 patients. All were grossly continent, but 32% experienced occasional soiling. The mean stool frequency was 5/day and 1/night. The overall failure rate was 6%. Eighty-nine percent of patients were happy with the outcome. We conclude that restorative proctocolectomy is safe and provides acceptable functional results. It should be the operation of choice in most patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1989

Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir. Comparison of two-stage vs. three-stage procedures and analysis of factors that might affect outcome.

Restorative proctocolectomy and ileal reservoir, performed as a two-stage procedure, has the advantages of a shorter hospital stay, one less anesthetic, and a shorter time with a stoma when compared with the three-stage procedure. In a prospective, nonrandomized study of 152 consecutive patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (57 two-stage and 95 three-stage), the complication rates for the ileal reservoir phase and the functional results of the two- and three-stage operations were compared. The results suggest that there is no advantage to the three-stage procedure except in the following circumstances: when urgent surgery is required for the complications of ulcerative colitis, when malignancy or Crohn's disease cannot be ruled out, and when a patient with active colitis has a combination of a low hemoglobin value (male less than 13.5 g/dl, female less than 11.5 g/dl), a low serum albumin level (less than 40 g/l), and is taking oral steroids.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed1989

Experience of restorative proctocolectomy with ileal reservoir.

The experience gained with restorative proctocolectomy and ileal reservoir in 60 patients is presented. Fifty-two patients had W reservoirs and the operative technique of the procedure is described in detail. Forty patients had a defunctioning ileostomy and 20 had a single stage procedure. There was no perioperative mortality. The main complications were sepsis (28 per cent), intestinal obstruction (18 per cent) and reservoir ileitis (20 per cent). There was a significant improvement in sepsis rate (from 20 to 4 per cent) and hospital stay (from 31.8 to 15.6 days) with increased experience. The functional results of 48 patients with W reservoirs was assessed. The mean number of evacuations per 24 h (+/- s.d.) was 3.8 +/- 0.2. Sixty-five per cent of patients did not evacuate at all, or rarely, at night and none evacuated more than once at night. Forty-four per cent of patients took antidiarrhoeal agents. Continence was normal in 50 per cent of patients. Minor leakage occurred in 46 per cent of cases, frequent leakage in 4 per cent and incontinence in none. Sexual function in 29 men was normal. Ninety-four per cent of patients considered the results of their operation to be good or excellent.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed1990

Restorative proctocolectomy: a procedure for the district general hospital?

Restorative proctocolectomy is widely regarded as the surgical procedure of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis, the majority being carried out within specialised regional centres. The use of this procedure outside such centres has been investigated by reviewing the results from a District General Hospital (DGH) over the 8 year period 1981-1989. Seventeen patients (11 male and 6 female with a median age of 36 years) underwent total colectomy and ileoanal anastomosis with formation of a pelvic reservoir (TC-IA). Fourteen had ulcerative colitis (UC), 2 familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) and one a colonic and rectal cancer. Three pouch designs were used ("S" in 7, "J" in 8 and "W" in 2) with no operative or perioperative deaths. Further laparotomy was required in two patients for adhesions and pelvic sepsis. Functional results were assessed in 16 patients at a mean of 5 years after surgery. The median daily stool frequency was 5 (range 2-6). Twelve of the 16 patients defaecate spontaneously, 2 regularly self-catheterized and 2 do so occasionally. None of the patients is incontinent of formed or liquid stool but one has occasional soiling. These results suggest that TC-IA may be satisfactorily performed outside a specialised unit.

Adenomatous Polyposis Coli↗

PubMed1990

Videoproctographic assessment after restorative proctocolectomy.

Videoproctography was performed in 40 patients after restorative proctocolectomy to evaluate pouch emptying, anopouch angle, and pelvic floor movement in relationship to functional outcome. Results were compared between the two different pouch designs tested and a control group of 26 patients who had an intact rectum. There was no difference in emptying between the two pouch designs or compared with the control subjects. Emptying did not influence either the frequency of defecation or patient soiling rate. The presence of an anal stricture was associated with poor emptying in each case in the pouch group. Anorectal angle was no different between the different pouch designs or compared with the control group at rest, during pelvic floor contraction, or attempted defecation. A similar finding was obtained with anorectal angle position and movement during pelvic floor contraction and attempted defecation in both pouch design groups and when compared with normal rectum. This study shows that the only factor that is consistently associated with poor pouch emptying is the presence of an anal stricture.

Adult↗

PubMed1991

[(Procto)colectomy with permanent ileostomy versus restorative proctocolectomy in ulcerative colitis; the past as background for the present].

In the University Hospital of Utrecht, in order to assess the value of 'restorative' proctocolectomy, the early and late complications after 'classical' (procto)colectomy with establishment of a permanent ileal stoma were evaluated retrospectively over the period 1969-1988. The inclusion criteria were: having undergone a (procto)colectomy with establishment of an ileal stoma because of pathologico-anatomically confirmed ulcerative colitis, with follow-up in the clinic mentioned. Data on the preoperative period, on the operation and on the early and late complications were collected of 101 patients. Immediately postoperative complications were encountered in 50% of the patients. Mortality was 2% in the group as a whole and 5% after emergency surgery. Late complications occurred in 62% of the patients, and in 45% of the patients they necessitated one or several reoperations. Sources of late complications included: the rectal stump left in situ, the perineal wound area, the stoma and the formation of abdominal adhesions. Classical (procto)colectomy with establishment of a permanent ileal stoma entails a large proportion of early and late postoperative complications. It is asserted that the complications at present observed after restorative proctocolectomy must not prompt a return to classical proctocolectomy as the standard surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis.

Adolescent↗

PubMed1991

Ulcerative colitis in the anal canal of patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy.

The development of stapling instruments has obviated the need to perform anal mucosectomy for ulcerative colitis, but the potential exists for continued inflammation and, perhaps, malignant change. We reviewed the pathology specimens of patients who had had restorative proctocolectomy, to determine the incidence and severity of inflammation in the anal mucosa.

Anal Canal↗

PubMedDate not supplied

Pouch ileitis in excluded reservoir: an unusual complication of restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis.

One case of pouch ileitis after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis is described. Diagnosis was made by endoscopy, histology and electron microscopy. The most prominent feature was intense inflammation of the mucosa and submucosa, with atrophy of the villi, and colonic metaplasia, occurring before closure of the loop ileostomy. The patient improved after a course of metronidazole therapy, but ileostomy closure was postponed. It appears that the ileum mucosa of patients with ulcerative colitis is highly prone to the development of inflammation and careful, regular follow-up is recommended.

Adult↗

PubMed1989

The clinical and functional outcome after restorative proctocolectomy. A prospective study in 100 patients.

One hundred consecutive patients treated by restorative proctocolectomy with construction of an ileo-anal anastomosis and a J-shaped (n = 90) or an S-shaped ileal reservoir were studied prospectively to evaluate postoperative complications and functional outcome and to search for factors that might influence results. There were no deaths. Postoperative complications requiring surgery were pelvic sepsis (3 patients), pouch-related fistula (2), peritonitis following ileostomy closure (3) and small bowel obstruction (6), with an overall relaparotomy rate of 14%. The cumulative risk of pouchitis was 30% at 2 years. The average stool frequency decreased gradually, stabilizing at about five evacuations/24 h after 1 year. At that time 9% of patients still had greater than or equal to 7 day-time evacuations and 40% had night evacuations (greater than 1/week). These parameters did not improve further with time. Mucous soiling, a frequent problem initially, also diminished with time, occurring in 30% of patients at 1 year. At 2 years, however, this mucous leak occurred in only 20%, suggesting that improvement of continence can be expected to occur even beyond one year. Despite defects in function patient satisfaction was generally excellent. So far only three patients have preferred conversion to an ileostomy. To establish which factors might influence the functional results a specially designed scoring system, combining all functional variables, was used. It was shown that results deteriorated with increasing age and that elderly women tended to have a poorer result than elderly men. Sex, previous parity or postoperative complications appeared not to affect the functional outcome. Male sexual disturbances occurred in 8%.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Adult↗