PubMed Health⌕ Search

SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Prolactin--analysis”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources
PubMed1977

Pituitary autonomy in hyperprolactinemic secondary amenorrhea: results of hypothalamic-pituitary testing.

Twenty-seven women with secondary amenorrhea of greater than six months duration were subjected to multiple testing of hypothalamo-pituitary function. They were divided into normo-prolactinemic (Group 1 mean serum prolactin (PRL) 9.8 ng/ml; range 6.8 to 13.0 ng/ml; n=9) and hyperprolactinemic (Group 2 mean 37.5 ng/ml; range 19.2 to 93.7 ng/ml; n=18) groups on the basis of 4 weekly baseline determinations. Group 2 had significantly (P less than .05) lower serum LH and urinary pregnanediol levels than did Group 1; there was no statistical difference between the groups in serum FSH, T4, T3 or urinary estrogen measurements. Two women in Group 2 were found to have a pituitary chromophobe adenoma. Group 2 women showed no significant rises in serum PRL following stimulation tests with thyrotropin releasing hormone (TRH, 200 microng iv) and metoclopramide (10 mg orally), which caused significant responses in Group 1. The TSH response to TRH was, however, preserved in Group 2, while it was subnormal in Group 1 subjects. Both groups showed similar FSH and LH responses to luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone (LHRH, 25 microng iv). No significant suppression of serum PRL was seen in Group 2 patients given L-Dopa (500 mg orally),, which produced a significant response (P less than 0.05) in Group 1 subjects, while all patient showed marked reduction in serum PRL values following 2-bromo-alpha-ergocryptine (CB-154, 2.5 mg orally). When compared with other Group 2 members, the 2 cases with proven pituitary adenomata gave similar responses to the stimulation-inhibition tests and were not clearly distinguished on this basis. We conclude: 1. The pattern of PRL responses to dynamic tests, although of pathophysiological interest an autonomous pituitary lesions in patients with hyperprolactinemic secondary amenorrhea. 2. Such dynamic tests, although a pathophysiological interest, provide no clinical information additional to that provided by the mean basal serum PRL value. 3. In clinical practice, such dynamic tests should be confined to patients with mean serum PRL levels at around the upper limit of the normal range.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Changes in the prolactin response to thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) during the menstrual cycle of normal women.

Serum prolactin (PRL) and thyrotropin (TSH) levels were measured after iv administration of 200 microng of synthetic thyrotropin-releasing hormone (TRH) in 20 normal women ages 18 to 34. Ten women received TRH on days 7 to 8 of the menstrual cycle and 10 women received TRH on days 21-22. Although there was no difference in the dose of TRH relative to body weight in the two groups of women, the peak PRL level after TRH stimulation was greater in the women studied on day 21-22 (48.5+/-5.7 ng/ml, mean+/-SE) than on day 7-8 (35.2+/-4.2 ng/ml) of the cycle (P less than 0.05). In contrast, TSH rose to a greater degree in the preovulatory phase (13.8+/-1.8 micronU/ml) than the luteal phase (7.7+/-0.7 micronU/ml of the cycle (P less than .01). Studies of the PRL and TSH response after TRH administration should take the phase of the menstrual cycle into account.

Adult↗
PubMed1978

The relationship of changes in serum estradiol and progesterone during the menstrual cycle to the thyrotropin and prolactin responses to thyrotropin-releasing hormone.

The responses of serum TSH and PRL to TRH (500 microgram) were studied in normal young women in the early follicular, periovulatory, and midluteal phases of the menstrual cycle in order to examine the relationship of these responses to the levels of estradiol relationship of these responses to the levels of estradiol (E2) and progesterone. Each woman was studied twice in each phase in order to assess intraindividual variability. There was no significant difference in either the TSH or PRL responses among the phases of the menstrual cycle nor was either response affected by the periovulatory rise in E2 or by the luteal rise in both E2 and progesterone. Thus, the interpretation of the TSH and PRL responses to TRH in normal women is not affected by the menstrual cycle although both responses are greater in women that in men. Both the peak TSH and peak PRL after TRH were highly correlated with the basal levels of TSH (r = 0.85; P less than 0.01) and PRL (r = 0.67; P less than 0.01), respectively, indicating that the TSH and PRL responses to TRH in women are directly proportionate to the basal levels of the respective hormones, as previously shown for the TSH response in men. The mean intraindividual variability (coefficient of variation) of the TSH response to TRH was 18%, but ranged as high as 56%, while that of the PRL response was 16% and ranged up to 31%; variability was not affected by the phase of the menstrual cycle. The normal range of the peak TSH after TRH in women is 7-33 microU/ml (mean +/- 2 SD); however, because of the variability, a normal woman may sometimes have a peak TSH after TRH as low as 4 microU/ml. Repeating the test will result in a normal value if the woman is truly normal. Similarly, the normal peak PRL after TRH in women is 22-111 ng/ml (mean +/- 2 SD); usually, however, the lower limit is 30 ng/ml with lower values due to intraindividual variation. The data suggest that the higher average level of E2 in women compared to women, but that the cyclic changes in serum E2 or progesterone in women have little or no additional effect.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Influence of LH/FSH releasing hormone (LRH) on the basal secretion of gonadotrophins in relation to plasma levels of oestradiol, progesterone and prolactin during the post-partum period in lactating and in non-lactating women.

The pituitary responsiveness to LH/FSH releasing hormone (LRH) was studied in the puerperium in lactating and in non-lactating women. The response of both groups of patients to 25 mug LRH iv was tested 8-10 days, 15-17 days, and 29-32 days after a normal delivery at full term. The basal levels of FSH were low during the first 10 days after delivery. A rise was then observed, and about 4 weeks after delivery levels above or in the upper normal range of a normal follicular phase were recorded. The levels were significantly higher in the lactating group. When compared with the normal follicular phase, the relative increase in FSH basal levels was higher than the increase in LH basal levels in both groups of patients. The period of non-responsiveness of the pituitary to LRH was found to be of equal length in the two groups. In both groups the FSH response returned more rapidly than the LH response. About 2 weeks after delivery a reverse pattern of gonadotrophin response to LRH was seen with a FSH response that was greater than the LH response compared with what is generally observed in the various phases of the menstrual cycle in eumenorrhoeic women. This pattern was more pronounced in the lactating group about 4 weeks after delivery. Oestradiol levels were low and roughly equal on the three test occasions in each group, but in the non-lactating group there was a tendency to higher concentrations. Prolactin levels were highest about one week after delivery and then showed a tendency to decrease, and this was more pronounced in the non-lactating group. Progesterone levels were invariably low in both groups.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Hypogonadism, galactorrhoea and hyper-prolactinaemia: Evaluation of pituitary gonadotrophins reserve before and under bromocriptine.

Twenty patients with hypogonadism (19 women with amenorrhoea and 1 man with impotence and infertility), galactorrhoea and hyper-prolactinaemia (range: 36 to 344 ng/ml) were studied. The radiological study of the sella turcica, including in all cases hypocycloidal tomograms, allowed classification of the patients into 3 groups: group I (n = 4) had a grossly enlarged sella turcica, group II (n = 12) had localized alterations indicating the probable existence of a prolactin-secreting microadenoma ("microdeformation") while group III patients presented no radiological abnormality. Before treatment, all the patients were submitted to a complete evaluation of the function of their anterior pituitary, including the LH and FSH responses to iv administration of Gn-RH. All the group I patients had low basal LH levels and a blunted response to Gn-RH. The basal LH and in response to Gn-RH were normal in most of the group II patients and in all of the group III patients. An exaggerated FSH response to Gn-RH was observed in 6/12 patients with microdeformation (group II) but not in groups I and III patients. A low LH and a blunted LH response to Gn-RH is highly suggestive of the existence of a pituitary prolactin-secreting adenoma in case of amenorrhoea and hyper-prolactinaemia patients; a normal response does not however rule out such a diagnosis. The reasons for a exaggerated FSH response to Gn-RH in patients with suspected prolactin-secreting microadenoma remain to be investigated though this pattern can also occur in other cases of amenorrhoea. Hence the Gn-RH test might contribute to the assessment of the hypothalamo-pituitary axis of patients with hyper-prolactinaemia. Six patients treated for 4 months with bromocriptine (CB-154) were submitted to re-evaluation of their pituitary gonadotrophins reserve. All the women experienced restoration of menses with 39 days of treatment and the male patient regained potency. It was observed that bromocriptine treatment and subsequent normalized prolactin levels in the 4 group II women tested were associated with normalization of their previously exaggerated FSH response to Gn-RH; LH responses were also diminished in these cases. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that hyper-prolactinaemia per se could interfere with the endogenous secretion of Gn-RH at the hypothalamic level. In one patient with grossly enlarged sella turcica and a previous lack of an LH and FSH response to Gn-RH, bromocriptine treatment restored a normal gonadotrophins response, confirming that, in this case, the alteration of this response was indeed due to a prolonged lack of endogenous Gn-RH secretion.

Adolescent↗
PubMed1977

Pituitary gonadotrophin secretion during the first weeks of pregnancy.

A longitudinal study of basal plasma LH and FSH and their responses to 25 microng LRH iv as well as basal levels of oestradiol, progesterone, prolatin and HCG was performed every week in 3 women, pregnant after heterologous insemination, from conception until the 6th week of gestation. A comparative study was carried out in 7 women in cycles in which no conception occurred after insemination. All hormones were assayed with radioimmunoassay. LH was measured with a specific assay for native HL, which did not cross-react with HCG. A decrease in basal levels of LH and FSH as well as decreasing responses to LRH was found during the first 2 weeks of gestation. These changes did not differ from what was observed during the luteal phase in the non-conception cycles. One week later the basal FSH levels and the FSH response in the pregnant women showed a further decrease, while in the non-pregnant women, now reaching the early follicular phase, a rise in FSH basal levels occurred. The basal levels of LH and the LH response, however, did not differ from that found in the non-pregnant woment at this time. FSH basal levels remained below the lower normal limit in eumenorrhoic women from the 3rd week of gestation. By this time the FSH response was almost completely inhibited. The LH basal levels, however, remained above the lower normal limit in eumenorrhoic women, but the LH response to LRH progressively decrease and was completely inhibited by the 5th week of gestation. In the non-conception cycles the LH response varied with the levels of oestradiol in plasma. This was not found in the pregnant women as the decrease in gonadotrophin response occurred while oestradiol remained at mid-cycle levels during the first 4 weeks of gestation. Rather it seems that the increasing and continuously elevated level of progesterone, in the presence of appropriate levels of oestradiol, might be the main go nadal steroid responsible for the diminishing pituitary secretion. The contribution of HCG to the further decrease in gonadotrophin secretion after the 2nd week of pregnancy cannot be answered by the present studies. Prolactin remained at non-pregnant levels until the 6th week of gestation, and appeared to have no influence on the secretion of gonadotrophins during early pregnancy.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

Steroid sex hormones and prolactin in postmenopausal women with generalized mammary carcinoma during prolonged dexamethasone treatment.

The endocrine response to prolonged dexamethasone treatment was investigated in six postmenopausal women with generalized mammary carcinoma. Plasma cortisol levels decreased rapidly and became undetectable whereas significant concentrations of plasma dehydroepiandrosterone and androstenedione persisted throughout the study, even in two ovariectomized patients, indicating a certain degree of autonomy or a greater resistance of adrenal 'androgens' to the inhibition of ACTH secretion. Except in the ovariectomized patients, plasma testosterone did not fall significantly whereas the plasma oestrogens tended progressively towards undetectable concentrations. A similar response was found in six normal postmenopausal women although the disappearance of their oestrogens was relatively rapid. This indicates that much of the testosterone present after the menopause could still be produced by the ovaries whereas the ovarian production of oestrogens becomes negligible. The delayed disappearance of oestrogens in the patients with mammary carcinoma indicates that the persisting adrenal 'androgens' remained efficient precursors of oestrogen synthesis within the peripheral tissues and presumably within the mammary tumour itself. Plasma dihydrotestosterone behaved like the plasma oestrogens. Despite the fall in plasma oestrogens, plasma gonadotrophins did not increase further but plasma prolactin rose progressively. The persistance of steroid sex hormones and the rise of plasma prolactin might explain the poor response to dexamethasone treatment in mammary carcinoma.

Aged↗
PubMed1977

Steroid and prostaglandin concentrations in the plasma of pregnant ewes during infusion of adrenocorticotrophin or dexamethasone to intact or hypophysectomized foetuses.

Catheters were implanted into 16 ewes and their foetuses between days 110 and 124 of gestation. Hypophysectomy was attempted in eight of these foetuses. Continuous infusion of synthetic ACTH (10 microgram/h) or dexamethasone (1mg/24 h) into the foetus, starting between days 124 and 129, induced premature parturition. The concentration of progesterone in the maternal peripheral plasma decreased before parturition in all animals while the level of oestradiol increased in ewes with intact foetuses or in those in which hypophysectomy was incomplete. When hypophysectomy was complete, no increase in the maternal level of oestradiol occurred before delivery. The concentration of 13,14-dihydro-15-oxo-prostaglandin F2alpha increased in the peripheral plasma of ewes with intact or hypophysectomized foetuses infused with ACTH. It is suggested that an intact foetal pituitary gland is required for the rise in the level of oestrogen prepartum, but that this rise is not essential for increased prostaglandin production of parturition.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1977

Prolactin responsiveness to TRH in amenorrheic women with and without galactorrhea.

Sixty women were given intravenous injection of 200 microgram TRH to assess its diagnostic potential as a stimulus to PRL release. Following the administration of TRH, there was a prompt increase in serum PRL to 614.6%, to 296%, to 282.1%, and 34% in normal women, amenorrheic patients, non tumoral galactorrheic cases, and patients with pituitary tumors respectively. The TRH response above baseline of PRL levels was statistically significant in all groups, but the women with pituitary tumors which showed a blunted response. The per cent of increment of PRL levels after TRH was similar in amenorrheic women regardless the presence or not of galactorrhea; this increase was significantly greater than in patients with pituitary tumors (p less than 0.01). The per cent of increment above baseline of PRL was significantly greater in menstruating women than in amenorrheic patients (p less than 0.001). In basis of present data: 1) there is a diminished PRL secretion after TRH in amenorrheic women regardless the presence of galactorrhea or hyperprolactinemia; 2) a blunted response to TRH in hyperprolactinemic women may be indicative of a pituitary tumor.

Amenorrhea↗
PubMed1976

Induction of lactogenic receptors. II. Studies on the liver of hypophysectomized male rats and on rats bearing a growth hormone secreting tumor.

The role of growth hormone (GH), as well as prolactin and ACTH, in the induction of the PRL receptor was investigated both in hypophysectomized male rat livers and in the livers of male rats bearing a GH secreting tumor. After 7 days of s.c. injections, specific binding (% SB) of PRL in controls and rats treated with oPRL, hGH, ACTH, hCG, estradiol (E2), or testosterone (T) was approximately 1%. Treatment with oPRL plus ACTH increased SB to 4%; adding E2 to this combination produced a further increase to 8%, whereas the addition of T decreased hepatic binding to 1%. Combination of hGH with ACTH was most effective, giving a SB of 33%, which is similar to that observed in the liver of rats bearing a GH secreting tumor (36%). These studies suggest that GH acts synergistically with PRL and/or ACTH to increase lactogenic binding sites in the male rat liver and that sex steroids have a modulating effect on this action.

Adrenocorticotropic Hormone↗
PubMed1977

Prolactin binding in ovariectomy-responsive and ovariectomy-nonresponsive rat mammary carcinoma.

Growth of the transplantable mammary tumor, MTW9, in W/Fu rats is greatly enhanced by elevated serum prolactin concentrations. This report compares the prolactin binding to tumor membranes in two mammary tumor strains derived from MTW9. Maximum binding to membranes of both tumors occurred at pH 7.6 after incubation for 30 hr at 4 degrees. The binding was inhibited only by polypeptide hormones that possess lactogenic activity. MTW9-P, an ovariectomy-responsive tumor developed in rats maintained on daily perphenazine injections, had 4-fold-higher prolactin binding than had MTW9MtT, an ovariectomy-nonresponsive tumor developed in rats bearing the mammosomatotropic pituitary tumor, MtTW10. Withdrawal of perphenazine from rats bearing MTW9-P caused a fall to normal of plasma prolactin, no tumor regression, and no significant change in prolactin binding. In contrast, resection of MtT resulted in tumor regression, a fall to normal of serum prolactin, and a nearly 3-fold increase in prolactin binding. Scatchard plots of prolactin binding data yield an apparent affinity constant, Ka, of 1.2 X 109 liters/mole for both tumors. The 4-fold-higher prolactin binding in the ovariectomy responsive variant suggests a positive correlation between ovariectomy response and the number of membrane prolactin-binding sites. No correlation between prolactin sensitivity and prolacting binding is apparent.

Animals↗
PubMed1977

Prolactin binding to R3230AC mammary carcinoma and liver in hormone-treated and diabetic rats.

Specific 125I-labeled prolactin binding was measured in membrane particles prepared from R3230AC mammary carcinoma and liver of tumor-bearing Fischer rats after either prolactin, estrogen, or lergotrile mesylate treatment, or after the induction of diabetes by streptozotocin. Hormone binding to tumors was decreased by treatment with prolactin (0.5 or 1 mg/day) or estradiol valerate (7.5 mg/kg/week). In contrast, prolactin treatment did not affect prolactin binding to liver membrane particles, but estradiol valerate treatment resulted in a four-fold increase in prolactin binding to this tissue. Lergotrile mesylate, which lowers plasma prolactin levels, did not affect tumor growth or prolactin binding to either tumor or liver. Prolactin binding to both tumor and liver was significantly reduced in diabetic rats, suggesting that insulin may play an important role in controlling tissue sensitivity to prolactin. Specific binding of 125I-labeled prolactin to enzymatically dissociated cells from R3230AC tumors was demonstrated in vitro. The binding capacity of the cells was found to be of the same order of magnitude as the binding capacity in membrane preparations when appropriate corrections were applied for yields of cells and membranes. R3230AC tumor, which is responsive to prolactin appears therefore to be a useful model system for further study aimed at elucidation of growth and metabolic response to the hormone prolactin in breast cancer.

Acetonitriles↗
PubMed1977

[Antigonadotropic actions of prolactin. Study of 10 cases of women with hyperprolactinemia].

In order to determine the pituitary or ovarian site of the anti-gonadotrophic action of prolactin (PRL), ten women with hyperprolactinaemia were studied in the following way: 1) Repeated estimations of PRL, gonadotrophins (LH and FSH), plasma estradiol and progesterone during six weeks of treatment with bromocriptine. 2) Verification of the effects of estradiol benzoate on LH and FSH levels before and after normalisation of prolactin. 3) Exploration of the ovarian response to the administration of human menopausal gonadotrophin. Without it being possible to exclude any direct effect of prolactin on the ovary, it may be affirmed that the hormone decreases the sensitivity of the gonadotrophic cells to the positive feedback mechanism exerted by plasma estradiol.

Adult↗
PubMed1977

[The effect of several sexual steroids, 2-bromo-ergokryptin and lisurid-hydrogenmaleate an the postpartum concentration of serum prolactin and lactation (author's transl)].

The effect of Ablacton, Estrovis 4000, 2 Brom-alpha-ergokryptin (Cb 154) and of Lisurid-hydrogenmaleate (LHM) on lactation and the serum concentration of prolactin postpartum was studied. 10 normal nursing postpartum patients served as control. LHM was tested in a double blind study compared to placebo. The serum prolactin (PRL) was determined daily for the first 10 postpartum days by radioimmunoassay. Inhibition of lactation was consistent with Cb 154 (89% of the cases). Within two to three days after the onset of treatment with Cb 154 the changes of pregnancy in the breasts had completely subsided. The sexual steroids resulted in inhibition of lactation in 60% of the postpartum patients but mastodynia continued. LHM showed no difference from group taking placebo. The serum prolactin levels postpartum remained as high as a nursing mother's or rose with the administration of steroids. The administration of Cb 154 resulted in a drop of the serum prolactin to non-pregnant levels with in 2 days. The serum prolactin levels under treatment with LHM were not different from the group slowly. In nursing mothers, the stimulus of suckling maintain the pituitary secretion of prolactin as showed by higher serum prolactin levels and a slower decreased to normals than in the non-nursing mothers.

Bromocriptine↗