SEARCH · PubMed Health

Results for “Rabeprazole”

Explore indexed PubMed citations for clinical trials, systematic reviews and public health research. Read source abstracts and follow each citation to its original PubMed record.

Quote a phrase for an exact phrase match. Source license links do not imply unrestricted reuse.

At least 37 records · Page 2Linked to original sources

PubMed2001

Rabeprazole: an update of its use in acid-related disorders.

UNLABELLED: Rabeprazole is an inhibitor of the gastric proton pump. It causes dose-dependent inhibition of acid secretion. In 8-week studies, among patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GORD), rabeprazole 20 mg/day or 10mg twice daily was as effective as omeprazole and superior to ranitidine in the healing of GORD. Symptom relief with rabeprazole was superior to that provided by placebo and ranitidine and similar to omeprazole. In long-term trials rabeprazole 10 mg/day was similar to omeprazole 20 mg/day in a 2-year study and superior to placebo in 1-year studies, in both the maintenance of healing and prevention of symptoms in patients with healed GORD. In nonerosive GORD, 4-week studies have shown rabeprazole to be more effective than placebo in relieving heartburn and various other gastrointestinal symptoms. Data among patients with Barrett's oesophagus suggest rabeprazole 20 mg/day may be more effective than placebo in maintaining healing of associated oesophagitis after 1 year of treatment. One-week triple Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy with rabeprazole plus clarithromycin and amoxicillin achieved eradication rates of > or =85%. Rabeprazole is as effective as omeprazole and lansoprazole when included as part of a triple-therapy regimen for the eradication of H. pylori. Eradication rates of >90% were achieved when rabeprazole 20 to 40 mg/day was included as part of a quadruple eradication regimen. As monotherapy for peptic ulcer healing and symptom relief, 4- to 8-week studies have shown rabeprazole 10 to 40 mg/day to be superior to placebo and ranitidine and have similar efficacy to omeprazole. Preliminary 1-year data among 16 patients with Zollinger-Ellison syndrome suggest rabeprazole 60 to 120 mg/day can resolve and prevent the recurrence of symptoms and endoscopic lesions associated with this condition. In clinical trials of up to 2 years' duration the tolerability of rabeprazole is similar to that of placebo, ranitidine and omeprazole. Common adverse events assigned to rabeprazole have been diarrhoea, headache, rhinitis, nausea, pharyngitis and abdominal pain. Histological changes and increases in serum gastrin levels were unremarkable and typical of proton pump inhibitors. No dosage adjustment is necessary in renal and mild to moderate hepatic impairment. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole is a well tolerated proton pump inhibitor. It has proven efficacy in healing, symptom relief and prevention of relapse of peptic ulcers and GORD and can form part of effective H. pylori eradication regimens. It is an important alternative to H(2) antagonists and an additional treatment option to other proton pump inhibitors in the management of acid-related disorders.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2003

Systematic review: Rabeprazole-based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication.

AIM: To perform a systematic review of the efficacy of rabeprazole-based therapies in Helicobacter pylori eradication, and to conduct a meta-analysis comparing the efficacy of rabeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors when co-prescribed with antibiotics. METHODS: Studies evaluating rabeprazole plus antibiotics were considered. Only randomized trials comparing rabeprazole and other proton pump inhibitors with antibiotics, and differing only in the proton pump inhibitor, were included in the meta-analysis. Electronic and manual bibliographic searches were conducted. The percentage (weighted mean) of successful eradication was calculated. Meta-analysis was performed by combining the odds ratios (OR) of the individual studies. RESULTS: The eradication rates were as follows: 14-day rabeprazole-amoxicillin, 73%; rabeprazole-amoxicillin-clarithromycin for 3, 5, 7 and 10 days, 44%, 72%, 78% and 75%, respectively; low-dose rabeprazole (20 mg/day), amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 7 days, 81%; high-dose rabeprazole (40 mg/day), amoxicillin and clarithromycin for 7 days, 75%; 7-day rabeprazole-clarithromycin-nitroimidazole, 85%. Twelve comparative studies were included in the meta-analysis. The eradication rate with rabeprazole plus antibiotics was 79%; it was 77% with other proton pump inhibitors (OR = 1.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.93-1.42). Sub-analysis comparing rabeprazole at low doses (10 mg b.d.) with other proton pump inhibitors at standard doses (omeprazole 20 mg b.d. or lansoprazole 30 mg b.d.) showed no differences. CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole achieves similar H. pylori eradication rates to omeprazole and lansoprazole when co-prescribed with antibiotics. Low doses of rabeprazole (10 mg b.d.), when administered with two antibiotics, may be sufficient to eradicate H. pylori infection.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2006

Enantioselective disposition of rabeprazole in relation to CYP2C19 genotypes.

AIM: Rabeprazole is metabolized to some extent by CYP2C19. The purpose of this study was to elucidate the pharmacokinetics of each rabeprazole enantiomer in three different CYP2C19 genotype groups. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects, of whom each each were homozygous extensive metabolizers (homEMs), heterozygous extensive metabolizers (hetEMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs) for CYP2C19, participated in our study. After a single oral dose of 20 mg of racemic rabeprazole, the plasma concentrations of the rabeprazole enantiomers were measured over the course of 24 h. RESULTS: The area under the plasma concentration-time curves (AUC) of (R)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1.8-, 2.2- and 2.4-fold, respectively, greater than those of (S)-rabeprazole; the relative AUC ratios of (R)- and (S)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1:1.1:2.1 and 1:0.9:1.5, respectively. The mean maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) of (R)-rabeprazole in homEMs, hetEMs and PMs were 1.7-, 1.9- and 1.8-fold higher, respectively, than those of the corresponding (S)-enantiomer (P<0.05). There was no difference between homEMs and PMs in the elimination half-life of (S)-rabeprazole, whereas the elimination half-life of (R)-rabeprazole was significantly longer in PMs than in homEMs [1.7 h (1.4, 2.0) (mean (95% confidence interval)]vs. 0.8 h (0.6, 1.0), respectively, P<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: (R)-Rabeprazole disposition was influenced to a greater degree by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms than was that of (S)-rabeprazole. The effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the stereoselective disposition of rabeprazole was less than those of lansoprazole and omeprazole.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2006

Mass balance study of [14C] rabeprazole following oral administration in healthy subjects.

The study was designed to determine the excretion balance of radiolabeled rabeprazole in urine and feces and to examine the metabolite profile in plasma, urine and feces after a single oral dose of [14C] rabeprazole, preceded by once daily dose of rabeprazole for 7 days. Six healthy subjects were enrolled in this study. The study was a single-center, open-label, multiple-dose, mass-balance study. Each subject received a single 20 mg dose of rabeprazole tablet for 7 days followed by the administration of 20 mg of [14C] rabeprazole as an oral solution after an overnight fast on Day 8. After oral dosing of [14C] rabeprazole, the mean Cmax of total radioactivity was 1,080 +/- 215 ng equivalent/ml with 0.33 +/- 0.13 hours of the mean tmax. The apparent elimination half-life of total [14C] radioactivity was 12.6 +/- 3.4 hours. The total [14C] recovery in urine and feces was 99.8 +/-0.7% by 168 hours after oral administration of [14C] rabeprazole, and mean cumulative [14C] radioactivity excreted in urine was 90.0 +/- 1.7% by 168 hours and 79.8 +/- 2.5% of the radioactivity was excreted in urine within 24 hours. Excretion via feces added to the total by 9.8%. The major radioactive component in the early plasma samples was rabeprazole, however the thioether and thioether carboxylic acid metabolites were the main radioactive components in the later plasma sample. These results support the previous finding that the substantial contribution of the non-enzymatic thioether pathway minimizes the effect of CYP2C19 polymorphism on the inter-individual variation ofplasma clearance of rabeprazole compared with other PPIs. Low levels of the sulfone metabolite were detected only in early plasma samples. No rabeprazole was detected in any urine and feces samples. The main radioactive components in urine were thioether carboxylic acid and mercapturic acid conjugate metabolites, and in the feces, the thioether carboxylic acid metabolite. The administration of [14C] rabeprazole was safe as evidenced by the lack of serious adverse events and the fact that all observed events were mild in intensity. [14C] rabeprazole was rapidly absorbed after oral administration and mostly excreted in urine.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed1999

The effects of oral rabeprazole on endocrine and gastric secretory function in healthy volunteers.

AIM: To evaluate the short-term effects of rabeprazole 20 mg on endocrine parameters, in particular serum testosterone and cortisol, and on 24 h intragastric pH, H+ activity and nocturnal gastric acid secretion. METHODS: In this double-blind, two-period crossover study, 12 healthy young male volunteers were randomly given oral rabeprazole 20 mg o.m. or placebo for 14 days. There was a washout period of at least 1 week between the two studies. The effects of rabeprazole and placebo on cortisol and testosterone (primary criteria), and on tri-iodothyronine, thyroxine, 17beta-oestradiol, thyroid-stimulating hormone, thyroxine-binding protein, parathyroid hormone, insulin, glucagon, rennin, aldosterone, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteotrophic hormone, prolactin, somatotrophic hormone, dehydroepiandrosterone, cortisol-binding globulin and urinary 6-beta hydroxycortisol were compared. Intragastric 24 h pH, 24 h H+ activity and nocturnal gastric acid secretion were determined by pH probe and gastric aspiration. RESULTS: Rabeprazole produced no clinically relevant effects on endocrine function as assessed by measurement of serum testosterone, circadian serum cortisol levels, ACTH-stimulated serum cortisol levels and 17 other endocrine function tests. Rabeprazole significantly increased the 24 h median pH values compared to placebo (on Days 7 and 14 median values ranged from 3.92 to 6.88 with rabeprazole and from 1.48 and 4.22 with placebo, P < 0.001) and significantly decreased the integrated 24 h H+ activity (AUC08--08) from 343 mmol/L/h with placebo to 44 mmol/L/h with rabeprazole (P < 0.001). Following cessation of dosing, intragastric pH levels decreased and H+ activity increased, but acid secretion did not recover completely during the next 72 h. The mean value for nocturnal gastric acid secretion on Days 7 and 8 was 36 mmol/6 h with placebo and 5.6 mmol/6 h with rabeprazole (P < 0.001). Rabeprazole was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Rabeprazole did not influence endocrine function in healthy young male volunteers during short-term dosing. Rabeprazole substantially increased intragastric pH over a 24 h period and significantly decreased intragastric acidity and nocturnal gastric acid secretion.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2006

Enantioselective disposition of lansoprazole and rabeprazole in human plasma.

Lansoprazole is extensively metabolized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4 in the liver, whereas rabeprazole is primarily converted non-enzymatically to rabeprazole-thioether, with only some being oxidized by CYP2C19 and CYP3A4. Lansoprazole and rabeprazole possess asymmetric sulfur in their chemical structure and have typically been used clinically as a racemic mixture. This article reviews the pharmacokinetic differences between enantiomers of lansoprazole and rabeprazole in relation to the CYP2C19 genotypes. In our studies in healthy Japanese subjects, the magnitude of contribution of each lansoprazole enantiomer for CYP2C19 was greater than that for CYP3A4. CYP2C19 influenced the disposition of (S)-lansoprazole to a greater extent than the (R)-enantiomer. The R/S ratios for the AUC of lansoprazole in CYP2C19 homEMs, hetEMs and PMs was 12.7, 8.5 and 5.8, respectively. On the other hand, (R)-rabeprazole disposition was influenced to a greater degree by CYP2C19 genetic polymorphisms than (S)-rabeprazole. However, the R/S ratios for the AUC of rabeprazole in CYP2C19 homEMs, hetEMs and PMs was only 1.8, 2.2 and 2.4, respectively, suggesting a lesser effect of CYP2C19 polymorphisms on the stereoselective disposition of rabeprazole compared to lansoprazole. Such a difference in the AUC between rabeprazole enantiomers is likely to be dependent on stereoselectivity in the CYP3A4-mediated metabolic conversion from rabeprazole-thioether to rabeprazole. Both enantiomers of these PPIs have been reported to possess equal potency. Therefore, particularly with lansoprazole, the use of (R)-lansoprazole alone would be highly desirable for use in clinical applications.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2004

Different dosage regimens of rabeprazole for nocturnal gastric acid inhibition in relation to cytochrome P450 2C19 genotype status.

OBJECTIVE: For the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease, intragastric pH should be lower than 4.0 for no more than 4 hours a day (<16.7%). We aimed to develop optimal dosage regimens for rabeprazole to control nocturnal acidity in relation to cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C19 genotypes. METHODS: Fifteen Helicobacter pylori -negative volunteers, comprising 5 homozygous extensive metabolizers (EMs), 6 heterozygous EMs, and 4 poor metabolizers (PMs) of CYP2C19, took placebo and rabeprazole, at a dose of 20 or 40 mg once daily (at 10 pm ) for 8 days. Plasma rabeprazole concentrations and 24-hour intragastric pH were determined on days 7 and 8, respectively. Because the nocturnal intragastric pH was lower than 4.0 for more than 16.7% of the time with once-daily regimens in homozygous EMs and heterozygous EMs, they were administered 20 mg rabeprazole twice daily (8 am and 10 pm ) or 10 mg rabeprazole 4 times daily (8 am , 12:30 pm , 6 pm , and 10 pm ). RESULTS: With 40 mg rabeprazole once daily, the median percent time with nocturnal pH lower than 4.0 was less than 16.7% in PMs (9.5% [range, 3.0%-31.1%]) but not in homozygous EMs (45.3% [range, 29.0%-52.2%]) ( P = .043) and heterozygous EMs (41.3% [range, 33.0%-59.0%]) ( P = .043). The mean plasma rabeprazole concentrations differed among the different CYP2C19 genotype groups. With 20 mg rabeprazole twice daily and 10 mg rabeprazole 4 times daily, the median percent times with nocturnal pH lower than 4.0 were 5.0% (range, 0.0%-42.0%) and 1.0% (range, 5.0%-7.1%) in heterozygous EMs and 62.0% (range, 10.8%-68.3%) and 14.7% (range, 0.0%-41.7%) in homozygous EMs, respectively, and plasma concentrations were sustained longer than with the once-daily regimens. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that rabeprazole dosage regimens for sufficient acid inhibition are 20 mg once daily for PMs, 20 mg twice daily for heterozygous EMs, and 10 mg 4 times daily for homozygous EMs or heterozygous EMs.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2001

Decreasing oesophageal acid exposure in patients with GERD: a comparison of rabeprazole and omeprazole.

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole has been shown to be more potent and faster than other proton pump inhibitors in in vitro studies and highly effective in decreasing oesophageal acid exposure in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: This study was a multicentre, double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, parallel-group comparison of three active treatment regimens utilizing two different proton pump inhibitors, or placebo, administered over 7 days in patients with GERD. METHODS: Eighty-two patients with symptomatic GERD were given placebo, rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg o.m., or omeprazole 20 mg o.m. for 7 days. Twenty-four hour oesophageal pH monitoring was performed at baseline and repeated at the conclusion of the treatment period. RESULTS: At the end of study, the percentage time (mean +/- s.d.) with pH < 4 over a 24-h period was significantly decreased by the three active regimens but without significant difference between them (9.27 +/- 4.77; 2.53 +/- 4.27; 2.02 +/- 1.71 and 2.91 +/- 4.06 for placebo, rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., rabeprazole 20 mg o.m. and omeprazole 20 mg o.m., respectively). Acid exposure was normalized in 90% of patients treated with rabeprazole 10 mg b.d., 95% treated with rabeprazole 20 mg o.m., 78% treated with omeprazole 20 mg o.m., and only 9.5% of patients treated with placebo. Both rabeprazole and omeprazole were well-tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Although rabeprazole 20 mg o.m. showed greater activity numerically, this study demonstrates that rabeprazole 10 mg b.d. and 20 mg o.m. are equivalent to omeprazole 20 mg o.m. in decreasing oesophageal acid exposure.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2000

A comparison of rabeprazole, lansoprazole, and ranitidine for improving preoperative gastric fluid property in adults undergoing elective surgery.

UNLABELLED: Acid aspiration syndrome at the induction of anesthesia is still a potentially life-threatening complication. Its severity is affected by both pH and volume of the gastric juice that is aspirated. We compared the effects of rabeprazole (a new proton pump inhibitor), lansoprazole, and ranitidine on gastric fluid properties in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded fashion in 180 adult patients undergoing elective surgery. Patients were divided into six groups (n = 30 in each) according to their premedication. Patients in each group received placebo-rabeprazole (PLA-RAB), rabeprazole-placebo (RAB-PLA), rabeprazole-rabeprazole (RAB-RAB), lansoprazole-lansoprazole (LAN-LAN), placebo-ranitidine (PLA-RAN), or placebo-placebo (PLA-PLA) for the first-second medication. Each dose of the study drug was 20 mg for rabeprazole, 30 mg for lansoprazole, and 150 mg for ranitidine. The first medication was given orally at 9:00 PM on the day before surgery and the second at 5:30 AM on the day of surgery. Each patient fasted overnight and took the drug with 20 mL of water. After tracheal intubation, gastric fluid was aspirated via an orogastric tube, and the volume and pH of the aspirate was measured. Preoperative gastric fluid acidity and volume were improved by the study drugs in the following order: PLA-RAN (pH 5.3, volume 0.10 mL/kg), RAB-RAB, LAN-LAN, PLA-RAB, and RAB-PLA (pH 3.8, volume 0.22 mL/kg). The proportion of patients at risk of acid aspiration syndrome according to the traditional criteria (pH < 2.5 and volume > 0.4 mL/kg) was minimized in Groups RAB-RAB and PLA-RAN (0%). We concluded that a single morning dose of ranitidine rather than two doses (bedtime and morning) of rabeprazole was the most effective premedicant to control gastric fluid properties and to minimize the risk of aspiration pneumonitis. IMPLICATIONS: Acid aspiration syndrome at the induction of anesthesia is rare but still a potentially life-threatening complication. We compared rabeprazole, lansoprazole, and ranitidine for reduction of preoperative gastric fluid acidity and volume in elective surgery and found that a combination of bedtime and morning doses of rabeprazole, or a morning dose of ranitidine, similarly minimized the variables. In adult patients who are at risk of aspirating gastric contents, improvement of gastric fluid environment by rabeprazole can reasonably be anticipated to provide protection against pneumonitis should regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents occur.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2004

Effect of low-dose rabeprazole and omeprazole on gastric acidity: results of a double blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study in healthy subjects.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of acid-related symptoms requires rapid and consistent acid suppression, especially with on-demand regimens. AIM: To compare the antisecretory activity of low-dose rabeprazole and omeprazole in healthy, Helicobacter pylori-negative subjects. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, three-way crossover study, 27 volunteers were given rabeprazole 10 mg, omeprazole 10 mg, or placebo once daily for 7 days with a 10-14-day washout between treatments. Intragastric pH was monitored for 24-h on days 1 and 7 of each treatment. RESULTS: Median gastric pH was significantly higher with rabeprazole than with omeprazole or placebo: day 1: 2.3, 1.4 and 1.3, respectively (P = 0.0056, rabeprazole vs. omeprazole; P < 0.0001, rabeprazole vs. placebo); day 7: 3.7, 2.2 and 1.3, respectively (P = 0.0016 rabeprazole vs. omeprazole; P < 0.0001, rabeprazole vs. placebo). Time with gastric pH above 4 was significantly higher with rabeprazole than with omeprazole: day 1, 5.8 h vs. 3.7 h, respectively (P < 0.02); day 7, 10.5 h vs. 4.6 h, respectively (P = 0.0008). CONCLUSIONS: Rabeprazole 10 mg provides more rapid acid inhibition compared with omeprazole 10 mg. After 7 days, the time with pH above 4 is more than doubled with rabeprazole 10 mg vs. omeprazole 10 mg.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed1999

Rabeprazole: pharmacokinetics in patients with stable, compensated cirrhosis.

This single-center, open-label study was undertaken to compare the tolerability and pharmacokinetic profiles of rabeprazole, a new proton-pump inhibitor (PPI), in healthy volunteers and in subjects with chronic cirrhosis. Thirteen healthy men and 10 men with stable, compensated cirrhosis documented by biopsy or liver/spleen scan received a single 20-mg rabeprazole dose. Blood samples were drawn before and up to 24 hours after drug administration for the determination of plasma rabeprazole concentrations using high-performance liquid chromatography. Adverse events, vital signs, electrocardiograms, physical findings, and clinical laboratory test results were monitored before and during treatment to determine how rabeprazole was tolerated. Chronic liver disease substantially altered the pharmacokinetic profile of rabeprazole. The maximum rabeprazole concentration (+/- SD) in subjects with cirrhosis (635+/-199 ng/mL) was approximately 50% higher than that in the healthy volunteers (401+/-246 ng/mL), and both area under the curve and elimination half-life were increased by approximately 100%. Oral clearance in subjects with cirrhosis was 38% of that in the healthy volunteers. Rabeprazole was well tolerated by both groups. Three subjects reported a total of 5 clinical adverse events that were judged as definitely or possibly related to rabeprazole treatment. Some minor changes in laboratory values were judged to be clinically insignificant. In patients with mild-to-moderate liver dysfunction, clearance of this PPI, as with other members of the class, was markedly reduced and plasma levels were increased. Although caution is always warranted in patients with severe liver disease, drug accumulation is unlikely with rabeprazole 20 mg once daily, and dose adjustment does not appear to be indicated in patients with mild-to-moderate liver dysfunction.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2001

Rabeprazole-based 3-day and 7-day triple therapy vs. omeprazole-based 7-day triple therapy for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor with more potent acid suppressive and anti-Helicobacter effects. AIM: To compare two different regimens of rabeprazole-based triple therapy vs. 7-day omeprazole-based triple therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori infection. METHOD: Patients with proven H. pylori infection were randomized to receive: (i) 7-day rabeprazole, 10 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg, all twice daily; (ii) 3-day rabeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg, all twice daily; or (iii) 7-day omeprazole, 20 mg, amoxicillin, 1000 mg, and clarithromycin, 500 mg, all twice daily. Endoscopy (CLO test, histology) was performed before randomization and 6 weeks after drug treatment. RESULTS: One hundred and seventy-three patients were randomized. H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat, n=173/per protocol, n=167) were 88%/91% for 7-day rabeprazole-based therapy, 72%/72% for 3-day rabeprazole-based therapy and 82%/89% for 7-day omeprazole-based therapy, respectively. The per protocol eradication rate was significantly better in the 7-day rabeprazole-based therapy and 7-day omeprazole-based therapy groups when compared to the 3-day rabeprazole-based therapy group (P=0.01 and P=0.04, respectively). Compliance was excellent and all three regimens were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of seven-day rabeprazole-based triple therapy is similar to 7-day omeprazole-based triple therapy for the eradication of H. pylori infection.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2002

Integrated acidity and rabeprazole pharmacology.

BACKGROUND: Integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity can be calculated from measurements of gastric and oesophageal pH and used to quantify gastric and oesophageal acidity over time. Rabeprazole is a new proton pump inhibitor that is effective in treating gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD). AIM: To use measurement of integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity to determine the onset, duration and overall effect of rabeprazole in subjects with GERD. METHODS: Subjects with GERD were required to have oesophageal pH less-than-or-equal 4 for at least 10% of a 24-h recording. Effects of 20 mg rabeprazole on 24-h gastric and oesophageal pH were measured on days 1 and 7 of dosing. Integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity were calculated from time-weighted average hydrogen ion concentrations at each second of the 24-h record. RESULTS: At steady-state, 20 mg rabeprazole inhibited gastric acidity by 89% and oesophageal acidity by 95%. The first dose of rabeprazole inhibited gastric and oesophageal acidity by at least 70% of the steady-state effect. Oesophageal acidity could be divided into monophasic and biphasic patterns, and rabeprazole had different effects on oesophageal and gastric acidity in these two GERD subpopulations. The onset of action of the first dose of rabeprazole on gastric acidity was 4 h and on oesophageal acidity was 4 h in monophasic subjects and 7 h in biphasic subjects. Integrated acidity was more sensitive than time pH less-than-or-equal 4 in measuring the inhibitory actions of rabeprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Integrated gastric and oesophageal acidity are quantitative measurements that provide useful and novel information regarding the pathophysiology of GERD as well as the impact of antisecretory agents such as rabeprazole.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2002

Effects of rabeprazole, 20 mg, or esomeprazole, 20 mg, on 24-h intragastric pH and serum gastrin in healthy subjects.

AIM: To compare the antisecretory effects of rabeprazole and esomeprazole in an open, randomized, two-way crossover, clinical pharmacology study. METHODS: Twenty-four healthy subjects (14 men, 10 women; mean age 26.8 years) received rabeprazole 20 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg daily on days 1-5, with a 14-day 'wash-out'. Intragastric pH was recorded continuously, and serum gastrin measured, on days 0, 1 and 5. RESULTS: On day 0, mean intragastric pH AUC was significantly higher before the esomeprazole than before the rabeprazole treatment in four of the five time intervals analysed. On days 1 and 5, mean intragastric pH AUC was higher after rabeprazole than esomeprazole during 5-11, 14-24 and 0-24 h after dosing. Mean pH AUC in the first 5 h after dosing on day 5 was higher after esomeprazole than rabeprazole (P=0.012). On day 1, mean per cent times pH > 3 and > 4 were significantly greater after rabeprazole than esomeprazole during 0-14, 14-24 and 0-24 h. On day 5, mean serum gastrin AUC0-4 was higher (P = 0.017) after rabeprazole than esomeprazole (335 vs. 316 pg/mL.h). CONCLUSION: In this clinical pharmacology study, rabeprazole 20 mg daily was more effective than esomeprazole 20 mg daily in increasing intragastric pH and maintaining pH > 3 and > 4. On day 5, mean pH AUC was higher after esomeprazole than rabeprazole.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2026

Randomized controlled trial comparing 7-day fexuprazan-based and 14-day rabeprazole-based triple therapies for Helicobacter pylori eradication.

BACKGROUND: Fexuprazan is a newly developed potassium-competitive acid blocker used for the treatment of acid-related gastrointestinal diseases; however, clinical data regarding its efficacy in Helicobacter pylori eradication are lacking. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of a 7-day fexuprazan-based triple therapy regimen compared with a 14-day rabeprazole-based triple therapy regimen for H. pylori infection in Korean patients. METHODS: A randomized controlled single-center study was conducted to compare the eradication rates between 7-day fexuprazan (40 mg)-based triple therapy (with 1 g amoxicillin and clarithromycin 500 mg administered twice daily) and 14-day rabeprazole (20 mg)-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. The primary endpoint was the success rate of H. pylori eradication, determined using the 13C-urea breath test. Safety outcomes were also evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 79 patients were randomly assigned to the fexuprazan and rabeprazole groups. In the full analysis set, eradication rates were 80.00% (32/40) in the fexuprazan group and 82.05% (32/39) in the rabeprazole group. In the per-protocol set, eradication rates were 83.78% (31/37) and 88.89% (32/36), respectively (P = 1.000 and P =.737). The overall incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 70.00% (28/40) in the fexuprazan group and 66.67% (26/39) in the rabeprazole group, with no significant difference between groups (P =.812); both regimens were well tolerated. Among patients with clarithromycin-susceptible strains in full analysis set, eradication rates were 93.10% (27/29) in the fexuprazan group and 87.09% (27/31) in the rabeprazole group (P =.672). In the per-protocol set, eradication rates for susceptible strains were 96.42% (27/28) in the fexuprazan group and 93.10% (27/29) in the rabeprazole group (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: Seven-day fexuprazan-based triple therapy demonstrated eradication efficacy comparable with that of 14-day rabeprazole-based therapy in treatment-naïve Korean patients with H. pylori infection. The fexuprazan-based regimen showed a similar safety profile and comparable incidence of adverse events with that of the rabeprazole-based regimen.

Humans↗

PubMed2000

Rabeprazole is superior to ranitidine in the management of active duodenal ulcer disease: results of a double-blind, randomized North American study.

OBJECTIVE: The primary purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of rabeprazole versus ranitidine in the treatment of patients with active duodenal ulcer disease. METHODS: This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, parallel-group study enrolled 376 patients. Patients were randomly assigned to receive rabeprazole 20 mg administered once daily in the morning (q.a.m.) with matching ranitidine placebo twice daily (b.i.d.) (n = 188), or ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. with matching rabeprazole placebo q.a.m. (n = 188). Three visits were scheduled: wk 0 (baseline; days -3 to -1), wk 2 (day 15+/-3 days), and wk 4 (day 29+/-3 days). The primary efficacy response variable was defined as complete regeneration of the mucosa at the site of all ulcers identified during the study. Secondary efficacy variables included patients' ratings of frequency and severity of ulcer pain, frequency of antacid use, and improvement of overall physical well-being. Tolerability was evaluated with analyses of adverse events, laboratory evaluations, fasting serum gastrin levels, vital signs, body weight, and electrocardiograms. RESULTS: Up to 4 wk of treatment with rabeprazole 20 mg q.a.m. produced significantly greater healing rates, compared to treatment with ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. (83% vs 73%; p = 0.017). Significant differences between treatment groups were also observed for secondary efficacy indices. At wk 2, rabeprazole was more likely than ranitidine to produce complete resolution of duodenal ulcer pain (39% vs 25%; p = 0.006), improvement in duodenal ulcer nighttime pain severity (76% vs 65%; p = 0.044), and improvement in overall well-being (55% vs 41%; p = 0.009). At wk 4, the proportion of patients with normalization of overall well-being was significantly higher in the rabeprazole group than in the ranitidine group (45% vs 29%; p = 0.003). Rabeprazole was safe and well tolerated in this study. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active duodenal ulcer disease, rabeprazole 20 mg q.a.m. is superior to ranitidine 150 mg b.i.d. in healing, resolving ulcer pain frequency, improving nighttime pain severity, and improving overall well-being. Rabeprazole is an effective and well-tolerated alternative treatment for patients with active duodenal ulcer disease.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed2002

Eradication therapy with rabeprazole versus omeprazole in the treatment of active duodenal ulcer.

BACKGROUND: Rabeprazole has been demonstrated to be a potent antisecretory agent and has been shown to be clinically effective in the treatment of acid-related diseases. AIMS: It was to determine the efficacy of rabeprazole at 20 and 40 mg in addition to amoxicillin and clarithromycin in the treatment of active Helicobacter pylori-positive duodenal ulcers compared with omeprazole 40 mg. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and twenty-seven patients were randomised into three treatment groups: 40 patients were treated with rabeprazole 40 mg daily, 42 patients with rabeprazole 20 mg daily and 45 patients with omeprazole 40 mg daily for 10 days. All patients received amoxicillin 1 g twice a day and clarithromycin 500 mg twice a day for 5 days. All patients were re-assessed at least 4 weeks after the end of the treatment. RESULTS: According to the intention-to-treat (ITT) protocol, ulcer healing was observed in 90% of patients in the rabeprazole 40 group, in 85.7% in the rabeprazole 20 group and in 93.3% in the omeprazole 40 group. We observed H. pylori eradication in 90% ITT in the rabeprazole 40 group, in 80.9% ITT in the rabeprazole 20 group and in 88.8% ITT in the omeprazole 40 group. Statistical analysis did not show significant differences among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: A 10-day rabeprazole 20 mg regimen represents an efficacious and safe regimen for H. pylori eradication and ulcer healing.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗

PubMed1999

Rabeprazole: pharmacokinetics and tolerability in patients with stable, end-stage renal failure.

The authors compare the pharmacokinetic profiles, safety, and tolerability of rabeprazole, a new proton pump inhibitor (PPI), in healthy volunteers and in subjects with stable, end-stage renal failure. This single-center, open-label trial included two groups of subjects: 10 healthy males with 24-hour creatinine clearance > or = 90 mL/min/m2 and 10 males with renal failure (24-hour creatinine clearance < or = 5 mL/min/m2) receiving hemodialytic therapy. Normal subjects received a single, oral 20 mg rabeprazole dose. Those with renal failure received a 20 mg dose of rabeprazole on the day after hemodialysis and a second dose after a 2-week washout period during dialysis. Blood samples were drawn before and up to 24 hours after rabeprazole administration for determination of plasma rabeprazole concentrations by high-performance liquid chromatography. Safety and tolerability of rabeprazole were determined by reporting adverse events and comparing vital signs, ECG, physical examinations, and clinical laboratory tests before and during treatment. Comparison of pharmacokinetic results from healthy volunteers with those from subjects with renal failure indicated no clinically significant differences between groups. In addition, there were no statistically significant differences between any pharmacokinetic parameters recorded during or after hemodialysis. Rabeprazole was well tolerated by both groups. Only two drug-related adverse events were reported, and there were no significant treatment-emergent changes in vital signs or ECG. Treatment-emergent changes in hematologic and clinical chemistry parameters were observed for a few subjects in each group and generally represented only slight deviations from the normal range. These results indicate that no dosage adjustment of rabeprazole is required in patients with renal dysfunction. These findings and the well-documented clinical efficacy of this new PPI in patients with gastric ulcers, duodenal ulcers, or gastroesophageal reflux disease support rabeprazole's use in the treatment of patients with acid peptic disorders.

2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles↗